The three-channel model of sound localization mechanisms: interaural level differences

The current understanding of mammalian sound localization is that azimuthal (horizontal) position assignments are dependent upon the relative activation of two populations of broadly-tuned hemifield neurons with overlapping medial borders. Recent psychophysical work has provided evidence for a third channel of low-frequency interaural time difference (ITD)-sensitive neurons tuned to the azimuthal midline. However, the neurophysiological data on free-field azimuth receptive fields, especially of cortical neurons, has primarily studied high-frequency cells whose receptive fields are more likely to have been shaped by interaural level differences (ILDs) than ITDs. In four experiments, a selective adaptation paradigm was used to probe for the existence of a midline channel in the domain of ILDs. If no midline channel exists, symmetrical adaptation of the lateral channels should not result in a shift in the perceived intracranial location of subsequent test tones away from the adaptors because the relative activation of the two channels will remain unchanged. Instead, results indicate a shift in perceived test tone location away from the adaptors, which supports the existence of a midline channel in the domain of ILDs. Interestingly, this shift occurs not only at high frequencies, traditionally associated with ILDs in natural settings, but at low frequencies as well.     

Enhancement of interaural level differences improves sound localization in bimodal hearing

Users of a cochlear implant together with a contralateral hearing aid-so-called bimodal listeners-have difficulties with localizing sound sources. This is mainly due to the distortion of interaural time and level difference cues (ITD and ILD), and limited ITD sensitivity. An algorithm is presented that enhances ILD cues. Horizontal plane sound-source localization performance of six bimodal listeners was evaluated in (1) a real sound field with their clinical devices, (2) in a virtual sound field, under direct computer control, and (3) in a virtual sound field with ILD enhancement. The results in the real sound field did not differ significantly from the results in the virtual field, and ILD enhancement improved localization performance by 4°-10° absolute error, relative to a mean absolute error of 28° in the condition without ILD enhancement.     

The role of head-induced interaural time and level differences in the speech reception threshold for multiple interfering sound sources

Three experiments investigated the roles of interaural time differences (ITDs) and level differences (ILDs) in spatial unmasking in multi-source environments. In experiment 1, speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured in virtual-acoustic simulations of an anechoic environment with three interfering sound sources of either speech or noise. The target source lay directly ahead, while three interfering sources were (1) all at the target's location (0 degrees,0 degrees,0 degrees), (2) at locations distributed across both hemifields (-30 degrees,60 degrees,90 degrees), (3) at locations in the same hemifield (30 degrees,60 degrees,90 degrees), or (4) co-located in one hemifield (90 degrees,90 degrees,90 degrees). Sounds were convolved with head-related impulse responses (HRIRs) that were manipulated to remove individual binaural cues. Three conditions used HRIRs with (1) both ILDs and ITDs, (2) only ILDs, and (3) only ITDs. The ITD-only condition produced the same pattern of results across spatial configurations as the combined cues, but with smaller differences between spatial configurations. The ILD-only condition yielded similar SRTs for the (-30 degrees,60 degrees,90 degrees) and (0 degrees,0 degrees,0 degrees) configurations, as expected for best-ear listening. In experiment 2, pure-tone BMLDs were measured at third-octave frequencies against the ITD-only, speech-shaped noise interferers of experiment 1. These BMLDs were 4-8 dB at low frequencies for all spatial configurations. In experiment 3, SRTs were measured for speech in diotic, speech-shaped noise. Noises were filtered to reduce the spectrum level at each frequency according to the BMLDs measured in experiment 2. SRTs were as low or lower than those of the corresponding ITD-only conditions from experiment 1. Thus, an explanation of speech understanding in complex listening environments based on the combination of best-ear listening and binaural unmasking (without involving sound-localization) cannot be excluded.     

The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization.

Two experiments are described in which listeners judge the apparent directions of virtual sound sources-headphone-presented sounds that are processed in order to simulate free-field sounds. Previous results suggest that when the cues to sound direction are preserved by the simulation, the apparent directions of virtual sources are nearly the same as the apparent directions of real free-field sources. In the experiments reported here, the interaural phase relations in the processing algorithms are manipulated in order to produce stimuli in which the interaural time difference cues signal one direction and interaural intensity and pinna cues signal another direction. The apparent directions of these conflicting cue stimuli almost always follow the interaural time cue, as long as the wideband stimuli include low frequencies. With low frequencies removed from the stimuli, the dominance of interaural time difference disappears, and apparent direction is determined primarily by interaural intensity difference and pinna cues.     

Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences

To clarify the role of spatial cues in sound segregation, this study explored whether interaural time differences (ITDs) are sufficient to allow listeners to identify a novel sound source from a mixture of sources. Listeners heard mixtures of two synthetic sounds, a target and distractor, each of which possessed naturalistic spectrotemporal correlations but otherwise lacked strong grouping cues, and which contained either the same or different ITDs. When the task was to judge whether a probe sound matched a source in the preceding mixture, performance improved greatly when the same target was presented repeatedly across distinct distractors, consistent with previous results. In contrast, performance improved only slightly with ITD separation of target and distractor, even when spectrotemporal overlap between target and distractor was reduced. However, when subjects localized, rather than identified, the sources in the mixture, sources with different ITDs were reported as two sources at distinct and accurately identified locations. ITDs alone thus enable listeners to perceptually segregate mixtures of sources, but the perceived content of these sources is inaccurate when other segregation cues, such as harmonicity and common onsets and offsets, do not also promote proper source separation.     

Perception of across-frequency interaural level differences

The interaural level difference (ILD) is an important cue for the localization of sound sources. Just noticeable differences (JND) in ILD were measured in 12 normal hearing subjects for uncorrelated noise bands with a bandwidth of 13 octave and a different center frequency in both ears. In one ear the center frequency was either 250, 500, 1000, or 4000 Hz. In the other ear, a frequency shift of 0, 16, 13, or 1 octave was introduced. JNDs in ILD for unshifted, uncorrelated noise bands of 13 octave width were 2.6, 2.6, 2.5, and 1.4 dB for 250, 500, 1000, and 4000 Hz, respectively. Averaged over all shifts, JNDs decreased significantly with increasing frequency. For the shifted conditions, JNDs increased significantly with increasing shift. Performance on average worsened by 0.5, 0.9, and 1.5 dB for shifts of 16, 13, and 1 octave. Though performance decreases, the just noticeable ILDs for the shifted conditions were still in a range usable for lateralization. This has implications for signal processing algorithms for bilateral bimodal hearing instruments and the fitting of bilateral cochlear implants.     

The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise

A study was made of the effect of interaural time delay (ITD) and acoustic headshadow on binaural speech intelligibility in noise. A free-field condition was simulated by presenting recordings, made with a KEMAR manikin in an anechoic room, through earphones. Recordings were made of speech, reproduced in front of the manikin, and of noise, emanating from seven angles in the azimuthal plane, ranging from 0 degree (frontal) to 180 degrees in steps of 30 degrees. From this noise, two signals were derived, one containing only ITD, the other containing only interaural level differences (ILD) due to headshadow. Using this material, speech reception thresholds (SRT) for sentences in noise were determined for a group of normal-hearing subjects. Results show that (1) for noise azimuths between 30 degrees and 150 degrees, the gain due to ITD lies between 3.9 and 5.1 dB, while the gain due to ILD ranges from 3.5 to 7.8 dB, and (2) ILD decreases the effectiveness of binaural unmasking due to ITD (on the average, the threshold shift drops from 4.6 to 2.6 dB). In a second experiment, also conducted with normal-hearing subjects, similar stimuli were used, but now presented monaurally or with an overall 20-dB attenuation in one channel, in order to simulate hearing loss. In addition, SRTs were determined for noise with fixed ITDs, for comparison with the results obtained with head-induced (frequency dependent) ITDs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Binaural processing of modulated interaural level differences

Two experiments are presented that measure the acuity of binaural processing of modulated interaural level differences (ILDs) using psychoacoustic methods. In both experiments, dynamic ILDs were created by imposing an interaurally antiphasic sinusoidal amplitude modulation (AM) signal on high-frequency carriers, which were presented over headphones. In the first experiment, the sensitivity to dynamic ILDs was measured as a function of the modulation frequency using puretone, and interaurally correlated and uncorrelated narrow-band noise carriers. The intrinsic interaural level fluctuations of the uncorrelated noise carriers raised the ILD modulation detection thresholds with respect to the pure-tone carriers. The diotic fluctuations of the correlated noise carriers also caused a small increase in the thresholds over the pure-tone carriers, particularly with low ILD modulation frequencies. The second experiment investigated the modulation frequency selectivity in dynamic ILD processing by imposing an interaurally uncorrelated bandpass noise AM masker in series with the interaurally antiphasic AM signal on a pure-tone carrier. By varying the masker center frequencies relative to the signal modulation frequency, broadly tuned, bandpass-shaped patterns were obtained. Simulations with an existing binaural model show that a low-pass filter to limit the binaural temporal resolution is not sufficient to predict the results of the experiments.     

Localization of sound in rooms. V. Binaural coherence and human sensitivity to interaural time differences in noise

Binaural recordings of noise in rooms were used to determine the relationship between binaural coherence and the effectiveness of the interaural time difference (ITD) as a cue for human sound localization. Experiments showed a strong, monotonic relationship between the coherence and a listener's ability to discriminate values of ITD. The relationship was found to be independent of other, widely varying acoustical properties of the rooms. However, the relationship varied dramatically with noise band center frequency. The ability to discriminate small ITD changes was greatest for a mid-frequency band. To achieve sensitivity comparable to mid-band, the binaural coherence had to be much larger at high frequency, where waveform ITD cues are imperceptible, and also at low frequency, where the binaural coherence in a room is necessarily large. Rivalry experiments with opposing interaural level differences (ILDs) found that the trading ratio between ITD and ILD increasingly favored the ILD as coherence decreased, suggesting that the perceptual weight of the ITD is decreased by increased reflections in rooms.     

Interaural spectral asymmetry and sensitivity to interaural time differences

Listeners' ability to discriminate interaural time difference (ITD) changes in low-frequency noise was determined as a function of differences in the noise spectra delivered to each ear. An ITD was applied to Gaussian noise, which was bandpass filtered using identical high-pass, but different low-pass cutoff frequencies across ears. Thus, one frequency region was dichotic, and a higher-frequency region monotic. ITD thresholds increased as bandwidth to one ear (i.e., monotic bandwidth) increased, despite the fact that the region of interaural spectral overlap remained constant. Results suggest that listeners can process ITD differences when the spectra at two ears are moderately different.     

Sequential streaming due to manipulation of interaural time differences

The effect of apparent spatial location on sequential streaming was investigated by manipulating interaural time differences (ITDs). The degree of obligatory stream segregation was inferred indirectly from the threshold for detecting a rhythmic irregularity in an otherwise isochronous sequence of interleaved "A" and "B" tones. Stimuli were bandpass-filtered harmonic complexes with a 100-Hz fundamental. The A and B tones had equal but opposite ITDs of 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, or 2 ms and had the same or different passbands. The passband ranges were 1250-2500 Hz and 1768-3536 Hz in experiment 1, and 353-707 Hz and 500-1000 Hz in experiment 2. In both experiments, increases in ITD led to increases in threshold, mainly when the passbands of A and B were the same. The effects were largest for ITDs above 0.5 ms, for which rhythmic irregularities in the timing of the A or B tones alone may have disrupted performance. It is concluded that the differences in apparent spatial location produced by ITD have only weak effects on obligatory streaming.     

Buildup and breakdown of echo suppression for stimuli presented over headphones-the effects of interaural time and level differences

The current study investigates buildup and breakdown of echo suppression for stimuli presented over headphones. The stimuli consisted of pairs of 120-micros clicks. The leading click (lead) and the lagging click (lag) in each pair were lateralized on opposite sides of the midline by means of interaural level differences (ILDs) of +/-10 dB or interaural time differences (ITDs) of +/-300 micros. Echo threshold was measured with an adaptive one-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice procedure with a subjective decision criterion, in which listeners had to report whether they heard a single, fused auditory event on one side of the midline, or two separate events on both sides. In the control conditions, referred to as the "single" conditions, echo threshold was measured for a single click pair, the test pair, presented in isolation. In addition to the control conditions, two kinds of test conditions were investigated, in which the test pair was preceded by 12 identical conditioning pairs: in the "same" conditions, the interaural configuration (ILDs or ITDs) of the conditioning pairs was identical to that of the test pair; in the "switch" conditions, the interaural configuration of lead and lag was reversed between the conditioning pairs and the test pair, in order to produce a switch in the lateralizations of the stimuli between the conditioning train and the test pair. No matter whether the lateralization of the clicks was produced by ILDs or by ITDs, most listeners experienced a buildup of echo suppression in the "same" conditions, manifested by a prolongation of echo threshold relative to the respective "single" conditions. However, the breakdown of echo suppression was much stronger in the ILD-switch than in the ITD-switch conditions. In five out of six listeners, the ITD switch had hardly any effect on echo threshold, although the ITDs (+/-300 micros) produced roughly the same degree of lateral displacement as the ILDs (+/-10 dB). These results suggest that the dynamic processes in echo suppression operate differentially in pathways responsible for the processing of interaural time and level differences.     

Discrimination of interaural differences of time in the envelopes of high-frequency signals: integration times

Listeners detected interaural differences of time in trains of high-frequency clicks. The manipulated variables were the number of clicks in the train and the period between clicks. Thresholds were compared to an optimal integrator, where the binaural information accrued from each click in the stimulus train is equivalent. In agreement with data reported in the past, integration is optimal only when the period between clicks exceeds approximately 10 ms and when the duration of the entire stimulus train is less than about 250 ms. The first constraint represents a limitation due to a form of "binaural adaptation" and the second is due to a limited "integration period."     

Detection of simultaneous modulation of interaural time and level differences: effects of modulation rate and relative phase (L)

The binaural system is known to be sluggish, i.e., unable to track modulations in interaural parameters even at a relatively slow rate. The present study evaluated the binaural system's sensitivity to modulation phase rather than to modulation magnitude. The detectability of simultaneous modulations in interaural time and level differences with various relative phases were measured. It was found that for modulation rates up to 10-20 Hz, the detectability varied with the relative phase. This indicates that information about higher rates is lost at or below the level of cue integration.     

双耳幅值差确定声源方向的神经信息处理机理研究

神经信息系统实质上是定量系统, 应引起足够重视. 关于神经系统的定量研究方面的报道比较少见. 这一问题将会影响进一步的研究, 如双耳声音定向. 双耳定向是定量测量, 用定性分析的方法无法满足要求. 已有的生理实验发现声音输入信号强度与听觉神经的输出频率存在单调递增关系, 所以本文中声音强度的变化被简化成神经脉冲频率的变化. 本文基于圆映射和符号动力学原理, 建立了神经回路定量模型, 模型中对同侧输入回路采用兴奋性耦合, 对侧输入回路采用抑制性耦合, 并考虑神经元间突触连接的量子释放特征, 采用化学耦合模型实现连接, 用耦合系数表示神经元间的耦合程度. 采用Hodgkin-Huxley模型仿真研究听觉神经回路的输入/输出脉冲序列关系. 在已经仿真过的参数范围, 模型在输入信号变化与输出脉冲频率变化间存在单调递增/递减的关系. 对于单输入单输出的神经元, 采用符号动力学方法进行符号化; 对于多输入单输出的神经元, 采用分析各输出脉冲的产生时间, 判断其变化位置, 从神经脉冲序列中得到对应的两耳声音幅值差变化, 以此定位声源. 随着输出脉冲数的增加, 符号序列的长度增加, 符号序列对输入信号变化敏感, 能够得到较高的测量精度. 仿真结果表明这个模型是定量的, 神经脉冲序列能够区分信号的大小.     

The comparative effects of signal sensation level and sound-pressure level on interaural time discrimination

A series of experiments was performed to examine the extent to which precision of interaural time discrimination depends on the sound-pressure level (SPL) and/or sensation level (SL) of the signal. All experiments used a tone burst signal and a continuous white noise masker, which was either diotic or interaurally phase reversed. Results of the first experiment indicate that (1) at equal signal SLs, interaural time and intensity discrimination is more precise when measured with the added diotic noise, and (2) addition of the phase reversed noise, previously shown to cause less precise interaural time discrimination, has a similar effect on interaural intensity discrimination. In the second experiment, interaural time JNDs for a signal of constant SPL were measured as a function of noise level. Results show that a low-level diotic noise can benefit interaural time discrimination, particularly at 500 Hz. The third and fourth experiments were performed to measure interaural time discrimination as a function of increasing signal SPL but constant signal-to-noise ratio. The data show the JND decreasing with increasing signal SPL at nearly the same rate with or without the added noise, indicating that an increase in signal-to-noise ratio is not necessary for improved discrimination.     

Discrimination of interaural differences of level as a function of frequency

Discrimination of interaural differences of level (IDLs) was measured for pure tones as a function of frequency and as a function of the interaural difference of phase or level of a standard. Varying the interaural difference of the standard was assumed to change the lateral position of its intracranial image. Threshold IDLs were approximately constant over a frequency range from 200-5000 Hz, except in a region near 1000 Hz where they were slightly elevated. Thresholds increased as the value of the standard interaural differences of phase or level increased, implying that interaural resolution declines as the lateral image moves away from midline. The results are generally consistent with the predictions of current models of lateralization, but additions to these models are required in order for them to account for the slight frequency dependence of threshold IDLs.