Structural,Magnetic, and Computational Correlations of Some Imidazolo‐Fused 1,2,4‐Benzotriazinyl Radicals

1,3,7,8‐Tetraphenyl‐4,8‐dihydro‐1H‐imidazolo[4,5g][1,2,4]benzotriazin‐4‐yl ( 5 ), 8‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐1,3,7‐triphenyl‐4,8‐dihydro‐1H‐imidazolo[4,5g][1,2,4]benzotriazin‐4‐yl ( 6 ), and 8‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐1,3,7‐triphenyl‐4,8‐dihydro‐1H‐imidazolo[4,5g][1,2,4]benzotriazin‐4‐yl ( 7 ) were characterized by using X‐ray diffraction crystallography, variable‐temperature magnetic susceptibility studies, and DFT calculations. Radicals 5 – 7 pack in 1 D π stacks made of radical pairs with alternate short and long interplanar distances. The magnetic susceptibility (χ vs. T) of radicals 5 and 6 exhibit broad maxima at (50±2) and (50±4) K, respectively, and are interpreted in terms of an alternating antiferromagnetic Heisenberg linear chain model with average exchange‐interaction values of J=?31.3 and ?35.4 cm^?1 (g_solid=2.0030 and 2.0028) and an alternation parameter a=0.15 and 0.38 for 5 and 6 , respectively. However, radical 7 forms 1 D columns of radical pairs with alternating distances; one of the interplanar distances is significantly longer than the other, which decreases the magnetic dimensionality and leads to discrete dimers with a ferromagnetic exchange interaction between the radicals (2J=23.6 cm^?1, 2zJ′=?2.8 cm^?1, g_solid=2.0028). Magnetic exchange‐coupling interactions in 1,2,4‐benzotriazinyl radicals are sensitive to the degree of slippage and inter‐radical separation, and such subtle changes in structure alter the fine balance between ferro‐ and antiferromagnetic interactions.     

Ferromagnetic Interactions in a 1D Alternating Linear Chain of π‐Stacked 1,3‐Diphenyl‐7‐(thien‐2‐yl)‐1,4‐dihydro‐1,2,4‐benzotriazin‐4‐yl Radicals

X‐ray studies show that 1,3‐diphenyl‐7‐(thien‐2‐yl)‐1,4‐dihydro‐1,2,4‐benzotriazin‐4‐yl ( 6 ) adopts a distorted, slipped π‐stacked structure of centrosymmetric dimers with alternate short and long interplanar distances (3.48 and 3.52 Å). Cyclic voltammograms of 7‐(thien‐2‐yl)benzotriazin‐4‐yl 6 show two fully reversible waves that correspond to the ?1/0 and 0/+1 processes. EPR and DFT studies on radical 6 indicate that the spin density is mainly delocalized over the triazinyl fragment. Magnetic susceptibility measurements show that radical 6 obeys Curie–Weiss behavior in the 5–300 K region with C=0.378 emu K mol^?1 and θ=+4.72 K, which is consistent with ferromagnetic interactions between S=1/2 radicals. Fitting the magnetic susceptibility revealed the behavior is consistent with an alternating ferromagnetic chain (g=2.0071, J₁=+7.12 cm^?1, J₂=+1.28 cm^?1).     

Magnetic Properties of Two New Fe4 Single‐Molecule Magnets in the Solid State and in Frozen Solution

Two novel tetranuclear, star‐shaped iron(III) clusters, [Fe₄(acac)₆(Br‐mp)₂] and [Fe^III₄(acac)₆(tmp)₂], are described. Both have S=5 ground states resulting from antiferromagnetic nearest‐neighbour superexchange interactions, with J=?8.2 cm^?1 and J=?8.5 cm^?1 for 1 and 2 , respectively. Energy barriers for the relaxation of the magnetisation of approximately 12 cm^?1 were derived from AC susceptibility measurements. Magnetic resonance measurements revealed a zero‐field splitting parameter D=?0.34 cm^?1 for both complexes. AC susceptibility measurements in solution demonstrated that the complexes are reasonably stable in solution. Interestingly, the magnetisation relaxation slows down significantly in frozen solution, in contrast to what is generally observed for single‐molecule magnets. This was shown to result from a large increase in τ₀, the prefactor in the Arrhenius equation, with the energy barrier remaining unchanged.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and Magnetic Property of New Trispin Ln(III)‐Nitronyl Nitroxide Complexes

Four Ln(III) complexes based on a new nitronyl nitroxide radical have been synthesized and structurally characterized: {Ln(hfac)₃[NITPh(MeO)₂]₂} (Ln = Eu( 1 ), Gd( 2 ), Tb( 3 ), Dy( 4 ); NITPh(MeO)₂ = 2‐(3′,4′‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐4,4,5,5‐tetramethylimidazoline‐1‐oxyl‐3‐oxide; hfac = hexafluoroacetylacetonate). The single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis shows that these complexes have similar mononuclear trispin structures, in which central Ln(III) ion is eight‐coordinated by two O‐atoms from two nitroxide groups and six O‐atoms from three hfac anions. The variable temperature magnetic susceptibility study reveals that there exist ferromagnetic interactions between Gd(III) and the radicals, and antiferromagnetic interactions between two radicals (J_Gd‐Rad = 3.40 cm^?1, J_Rad‐Rad = ?9.99 cm^?1) in complex 2 . Meanwhile, antiferromagnetic interactions are estimated between Eu(III) (or Dy(III)) and radicals in complexes 1 and 4 , and ferromagnetic interaction between Tb(III) and radicals in complex 3 , respectively.     

Magnetic Properties of a Single‐Molecule Lanthanide–Transition‐Metal Compound Containing 52 Gadolinium and 56 Nickel Atoms

Monodisperse metal clusters provide a unique platform for investigating magnetic exchange within molecular magnets. Herein, the core–shell structure of the monodisperse molecule magnet of [Gd₅₂Ni₅₆(IDA)₄₈(OH)₁₅₄(H₂O)₃₈]@SiO₂ ( 1 a @SiO₂) was prepared by encapsulating one high‐nuclearity lanthanide–transition‐metal compound of [Gd₅₂Ni₅₆(IDA)₄₈(OH)₁₅₄(H₂O)₃₈]?(NO₃)₁₈?164 H₂O ( 1 ) (IDA=iminodiacetate) into one silica nanosphere through a facile one‐pot microemulsion method. 1 a @SiO₂ was characterized using transmission electron microscopy, N₂ adsorption–desorption isotherms, and inductively coupled plasma‐atomic emission spectrometry. Magnetic investigation of 1 and 1 a revealed J₁=0.25 cm^?1, J₂=?0.060 cm^?1, J₃=?0.22 cm^?1, J₄=?8.63 cm^?1, g=1.95, and z J=?2.0×10^?3 cm^?1 for 1 , and J₁=0.26 cm^?1, J₂=?0.065 cm^?1, J₃=?0.23 cm^?1, J₄=?8.40 cm^?1 g=1.99, and z J=0.000 cm^?1 for 1 a @SiO₂. The z J=0 in 1 a @SiO₂ suggests that weak antiferromagnetic coupling between the compounds is shielded by silica nanospheres.     

Seeking Hidden Magnetic Phenomena by Theoretical Means in a Thiooxoverdazyl Adduct

The oxidation of 1,5‐dimethyl‐3‐(2′‐pyridyl)‐6‐thiooxotetrazane (SvdH₃py) by benzoquinone leads to a 1:1 adduct of 1,5‐dimethyl‐3‐(2′‐pyridyl)‐6‐thiooxoverdazyl radical (Svdpy) with hydroquinone (hq). The single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction of this adduct at room temperature (RT) shows that the radicals exhibit a slight curvature that leads to the formation of alternating head‐to‐tail (antiparallel) stacked 1D chains. Moreover, temperature‐dependent X‐ray measurements at 100, 200, and 303 K reveal that the lateral slippages between the radicals of the stacks |δ₁| and |δ₂| vary from 0.64 to 0.78 Å and 0.54 to 0.40 Å between 100 and 303 K. Despite the alternation of the inter‐radical distances and lateral slippages, the magnetic susceptibility data can be fitted with excellent agreement using a regular one‐dimensional antiferromagnetic chain model with J=?5.9 cm^?1. Wavefunction‐based calculations indicate an alternation of the magnetic interaction parameters correlated with the structural analysis at RT. Moreover, they demonstrate that the thermal slippage of the radicals induces a switching of the physical behavior, since the exchange interaction changes from antiferromagnetic (?0.9 cm^?1) at 100 K to ferromagnetic (1.4 cm^?1) at 303 K. The theoretical approach thus reveals a much richer magnetic behavior than the analysis of the magnetic susceptibility data and ultimately questions the relevance of a spin‐coupled picture based on temperature‐independent parameters.     

Magnetic Coupling Constants of Self‐Assembled CuII [3×3] Grids: Alternative Spin Model from Theoretical Calculations

This paper reports a theoretical analysis of the electronic structure and magnetic properties of a ferromagnetic Cu^II [3×3] grid. A two‐step strategy, combining calculations on the whole grid and on binuclear fragments, has been employed to evaluate all the magnetic interactions in the grid. The calculations confirm an S=7/2 ground state, which is in accordance with the magnetisation versus field curve and the thermal dependence of the magnetic moment data. Only the first‐neighbour coupling terms present non‐negligible amplitudes, all of them in agreement with the structure and arrangement of the Cu 3d magnetic orbitals. The results indicate that the dominant interaction in the system is the antiferromagnetic coupling between the ring and the central Cu sites (J₃=J₄≈?31 cm^?1). In the ring two different interactions can be distinguished, J₁=4.6 cm^?1 and J₂=?0.1 cm^?1, in contrast to the single J model employed in the magnetic data fit. The calculated J values have been used to determine the energy level distribution of the Heisenberg magnetic states. The effective magnetic moment versus temperature plot resulting from this ab initio energy profile is in good agreement with the experimental curve and the fitting obtained with the simplified spin model, despite the differences between these two spin models. This study underlines the role that the theoretical evaluations of the coupling constants can play on the rationalisation of the magnetic properties of these complex polynuclear systems.     

Hydroxo‐Bridged Dimers of Oxo‐Centered Ruthenium(III) Triangle: Synthesis and Spectroscopic and Theoretical Investigations

The homometallic hexameric ruthenium cluster of the formula [Ru^III₆(μ₃‐O)₂(μ‐OH)₂((CH₃)₃CCO₂)₁₂(py)₂] ( 1 ) (py=pyridine) is solved by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. Magnetic susceptibility measurements performed on 1 suggest that the antiferromagnetic interaction between the Ru^III centers is dominant, and this is supported by theoretical studies. Theoretical calculations based on density functional methods yield eight different exchange interaction values for 1 : J₁=?737.6, J₂=+63.4, J₃=?187.6, J₄=+124.4, J₅=?376.4, J₆=?601.2, J₇=?657.0, and J₈=?800.6 cm^?1. Among all the computed J values, six are found to be antiferromagnetic. Four exchange values (J₁, J₆, J₇ and J₈) are computed to be extremely strong, with J₈, mediated through one μ‐hydroxo and a carboxylate bridge, being by far the largest exchange obtained for any transition‐metal cluster. The origin of these strong interactions is the orientation of the magnetic orbitals in the Ru^III centers, and the computed J values are rationalized by using molecular orbital and natural bond order analysis. Detailed NMR studies (¹H, ¹³C, HSQC, NOESY, and TOCSY) of 1 (in CDCl₃) confirm the existence of the solid‐state structure in solution. The observation of sharp NMR peaks and spin‐lattice time relaxation (T1 relaxation) experiments support the existence of strong intramolecular antiferromagnetic exchange interactions between the metal centers. A broad absorption peak around 600–1000 nm in the visible to near‐IR region is a characteristic signature of an intracluster charge‐transfer transition. Cyclic voltammetry experiments show that there are three reversible one‐electron redox couples at ?0.865, +0.186, and +1.159 V with respect to the Ag/AgCl reference electrode, which corresponds to two metal‐based one‐electron oxidations and one reduction process.     

Studying the Origin of the Antiferromagnetic to Spin‐Canting Transition in the β‐p‐NCC6F4CNSSN. Molecular Magnet

The crystal structure of the spin‐canted antiferromagnet β‐p‐NCC₆F₄CNSSN^. at 12 K (reported in this work) was found to adopt the same orthorhombic space group as that previously determined at 160 K. The change in the magnetic properties of these two crystal structures has been rigorously studied by applying a first‐principles bottom‐up procedure above and below the magnetic transition temperature (36 K). Calculations of the magnetic exchange pathways on the 160 K structure reveal only one significant exchange coupling (J(d1)=?33.8 cm^?1), which generates a three‐dimensional diamond‐like magnetic topology within the crystal. The computed magnetic susceptibility, χ(T), which was determined by using this magnetic topology, quantitatively reproduces the experimental features observed above 36 K. Owing to the anisotropic contraction of the crystal lattice, both the geometry of the intermolecular contacts at 12 K and the microscopic J_AB radical–radical magnetic interactions change: the J(d1) radical–radical interaction becomes even more antiferromagnetic (?43.2 cm^?1) and two additional ferromagnetic interactions appear (+7.6 and +7.3 cm^?1). Consequently, the magnetic topologies of the 12 and 160 K structures differ: the 12 K magnetic topology exhibits two ferromagnetic sublattices that are antiferromagnetically coupled. The χ(T) curve, computed below 36 K at the limit of zero magnetic field by using the 12 K magnetic topology, reproduces the shape of the residual magnetic susceptibility (having subtracted the contribution to the magnetization arising from spin canting). The evolution of these two ferromagnetic J_AB contributions explains the change in the slope of the residual magnetic susceptibility in the low‐temperature region.     

One‐Dimensional Ferromagnetically Coupled Bimetallic Chains Constructed with trans‐[Ru(acac)2(CN)2]−: Syntheses,Structures, Magnetic Properties,and Density Functional Theoretical Study

Four cyano‐bridged 1D bimetallic polymers have been prepared by using the paramagnetic building block trans‐[Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂]^? (Hacac=acetylacetone): {[{Ni(tren)}{Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂}][ClO₄]?CH₃OH}_n ( 1 ) (tren=tris(2‐aminoethyl)amine), {[{Ni(cyclen)}{Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂}][ClO₄]? CH₃OH}_n ( 2 ) (cyclen=1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane), {[{Fe(salen)}{Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂}]}_n ( 3 ) (salen^2?=N,N′‐bis(salicylidene)‐o‐ethyldiamine dianion) and [{Mn(5,5′‐Me₂salen)}₂{Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂}][Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂]? 2 CH₃OH ( 4 ) (5,5′‐Me₂salen=N,N′‐bis(5,5′‐dimethylsalicylidene)‐o‐ethylenediimine). Compounds 1 and 2 are 1D, zigzagged NiRu chains that exhibit ferromagnetic coupling between Ni^II and Ru^III ions through cyano bridges with J=+1.92 cm^?1, z J′=?1.37 cm^?1, g=2.20 for 1 and J=+0.85 cm^?1, z J′=?0.16 cm^?1, g=2.24 for 2 . Compound 3 has a 1D linear chain structure that exhibits intrachain ferromagnetic coupling (J=+0.62 cm^?1, z J′=?0.09 cm^?1, g=2.08), but antiferromagnetic coupling occurs between FeRu chains, leading to metamagnetic behavior with T_N=2.6 K. In compound 4 , two Mn^III ions are coordinated to trans‐[Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂]^? to form trinuclear Mn₂Ru units, which are linked together by π–π stacking and weak Mn???O* interactions to form a 1D chain. Compound 4 shows slow magnetic relaxation below 3.0 K with ?=0.25, characteristic of superparamagnetic behavior. The Mn^III???Ru^III coupling constant (through cyano bridges) and the Mn^III???Mn^III coupling constant (between the trimers) are +0.87 and +0.24 cm^?1, respectively. Compound 4 is a novel single‐chain magnet built from Mn₂Ru trimers through noncovalent interactions. Density functional theory (DFT) combined with the broken symmetry state method was used to calculate the molecular magnetic orbitals and the magnetic exchange interactions between Ru^III and M (M=Ni^II, Fe^III, and Mn^III) ions. To explain the somewhat unexpected ferromagnetic coupling between low‐spin Ru^III and high‐spin Fe^III and Mn^III ions in compounds 3 and 4 , respectively, it is proposed that apart from the relative symmetries, the relative energies of the magnetic orbitals may also be important in determining the overall magnetic coupling in these bimetallic assemblies.     

S=1/2 One‐Dimensional Random‐Exchange Ferromagnetic Zigzag Ladder,Which Exhibits Competing Interactions in a Critical Regime

The synthesis, crystal structure, and magnetic properties (from a combined experimental and First‐Principles Bottom‐Up theoretical study) of the new compound catena‐dichloro(2‐Cl‐3Mpy)copper(II), 1 , [2‐Cl‐3Mpy=2‐chloro‐3‐methylpyridine] are described and rationalized. Crystals of 1 present well isolated magnetic 1D chains (no 3D order was experimentally observed down to 1.8 K) and magnetic frustration stemming from competing ferromagnetic nearest‐neighbor (J_NN) interactions and antiferromagnetic next‐nearest neighbor (J_NNN) interactions, in which α=J_NNN/J_NN <?0.25. These magnetic interactions give rise to a unique magnetic topology: a two‐leg zigzag ladder composed of edge‐sharing up‐down triangles with antiferromagnetic interactions along the rails and ferromagnetic interactions along the zigzag chain that connects the rails. Crystals of 1 also present a random distribution of the 2‐Cl‐3Mpy groups, which are arranged in two different orientations, each with a 50 % occupancy. This translates into a random static structural disorder within each chain by virtue of which the value of the J_NN magnetic interactions can randomly take one of the following three values: 53, 36, and 16 cm^?1. The structural disorder does not affect the J_NNN value, which in all cases is approximately ?9 cm^?1. A proper statistical treatment of this disorder provides a computed magnetic susceptibility curve that reproduces the main features of the experimental data.     

Syntheses,crystal structures,and magnetic properties of 1-D coordination polymers

Three coordination polymers of Robson-type macrocycles, {[Cu₄L¹(4,4′-bipy)₂]·4ClO₄·H₂O}_∞ (1), {[Cu₄L²(4,4′-bipy)₄]·2CH₃CN·4ClO₄·2H₂O}_∞ (2), and {[Zn₂L²(4,4′-bipy)₂]·(ClO₄)₂}_∞ (3) (where H₂L¹ and H₂L² are the [2?+?2] condensation products of 1,3-diaminopropane with 2,6-diformyl-4-methylphenol and 2,6-diformyl-4-fluorophenol, respectively), have been synthesized and characterized. Magnetic susceptibility was measured for 1 and 2 from 2 to 300?K. The optimized magnetic data were J?=?–368.5?cm^?1, J′?=?40.5?cm^?1 with R?=?1.69?×?10^?6 for 1 and J?=?–291.22?cm^?1, J′?=?83.74?cm^?1, ρ = 0.00168 with R?=?1.8?×?10^?11 for 2, respectively. The data reveal strong antiferromagnetic interactions between two Cu(II) ions in the macrocyclic unit and ferromagnetic interaction between the Cu(II) ions in two adjacent macrocyclic units for 1 and 2.     

Observation of Slow Relaxation and Single‐Molecule Toroidal Behavior in a Family of Butterfly‐Shaped Ln4 Complexes

A family of five isostructural butterfly complexes with a tetranuclear [Ln₄] core of the general formula [Ln₄(LH)₂(μ₂‐η¹η¹Piv)(η²‐Piv)(μ₃‐OH)₂]?x H₂O?y MeOH?z CHCl₃ ( 1 : Ln=Dy^III, x=2, y=2, z=0; 2 : Ln=Tb^III, x=0, y=0, z=6; 3 : Ln=Er^III, x=2, y=2, z=0; 4 : Ln=Ho^III, x=2, y=2, z=0; 5 : Ln=Yb^III, x=2, y=2, z=0; LH₄=6‐{[bis(2‐hydroxyethyl)amino]methyl}‐N′‐(2‐hydroxy‐3‐methoxybenzylidene)picolinohydrazide; PivH=pivalic acid) was isolated and characterized both structurally and magnetically. Complexes 1 – 5 were probed by direct and alternating current (dc and ac) magnetic susceptibility measurements and, except for 1 , they did not display single‐molecule magnetism (SMM) behavior. The ac magnetic susceptibility measurements show frequency‐dependent out‐of‐phase signals with one relaxation process for complex 1 and the estimated effective energy barrier for the relaxation process was found to be 49 K. We have carried out extensive ab initio (CASSCF+RASSI‐SO+SINGLE_ANISO+POLY_ANISO) calculations on all the five complexes to gain deeper insights into the nature of magnetic anisotropy and the presence and absence of slow relaxation in these complexes. Our calculations yield three different exchange coupling for these Ln₄ complexes and all the extracted J values are found to be weakly ferro/antiferromagentic in nature (J₁=+2.35, J₂=?0.58, and J₃=?0.29 cm^?1 for 1 ; J₁=+0.45, J₂=?0.68, and J₃=?0.29 cm^?1 for 2 ; J₁=+0.03, J₂=?0.98, and J₃=?0.19 cm^?1 for 3 ; J₁=+4.15, J₂=?0.23, and J₃=?0.54 cm^?1 for 4 and J₁=+0.15, J₂=?0.28, and J₃=?1.18 cm^?1 for 5 ). Our calculations reveal the presence of very large mixed toroidal moment in complex 1 and this is essentially due to the specific exchange topology present in this cluster. Our calculations also suggest presence of single‐molecule toroics (SMTs) in complex 2 . For complexes 3 – 5 on the other hand, the transverse anisotropy was computed to be large, leading to the absence of slow relaxation of magnetization. As the magnetic field produced by SMTs decays faster than the normal spin moments, the concept of SMTs can be exploited to build qubits in which less interference and dense packing are possible. Our systematic study on these series of Ln₄ complexes suggest how the ligand design can help to bring forth such SMT characteristics in lanthanide complexes.     

Effect of Inter‐Porphyrin Distance on Spin‐State in Diiron(III) μ‐Hydroxo Bisporphyrins

The synthesis, structure, and properties of bischloro, μ‐oxo, and a family of μ‐hydroxo complexes (with BF₄^?, SbF₆^?, and PF₆^? counteranions) of diethylpyrrole‐bridged diiron(III) bisporphyrins are reported. Spectroscopic characterization has revealed that the iron centers of the bischloro and μ‐oxo complexes are in the high‐spin state (S=⁵/₂). However, the two iron centers in the diiron(III) μ‐hydroxo complexes are equivalent with high spin (S=⁵/₂) in the solid state and an intermediate‐spin state (S=³/₂) in solution. The molecules have been compared with previously known diiron(III) μ‐hydroxo complexes of ethane‐bridged bisporphyrin, in which two different spin states of iron were stabilized under the influence of counteranions. The dimanganese(III) analogues were also synthesized and spectroscopically characterized. A comparison of the X‐ray structural parameters between diethylpyrrole and ethane‐bridged μ‐hydroxo bisporphyrins suggest an increased separation, and hence, less interactions between the two heme units of the former. As a result, unlike the ethane‐bridged μ‐hydroxo complex, both iron centers become equivalent in the diethylpyrrole‐bridged complex and their spin state remains unresponsive to the change in counteranion. The iron(III) centers of the diethylpyrrole‐bridged diiron(III) μ‐oxo bisporphyrin undergo very strong antiferromagnetic interactions (J=?137.7 cm^?1), although the coupling constant is reduced to only a weak value in the μ‐hydroxo complexes (J=?42.2, ?44.1, and ?42.4 cm^?1 for the BF₄, SbF₆, and PF₆ complexes, respectively).     

Synthesis and characterization of μ-oxamido copper(Ⅱ)-iron(Ⅱ) heterobinuclear complexes with an antiferromagnetic exchange interaction

Four new u-oxamido heterobinuclear complexes have been synthesized and identified as [Cu(oxap)Fe(L)2]SO4, where oxap denotes the N, N'-bis(2-aminopropyl)oxamido dianion and L represents diaminoethane (en); 1,3-diaminopropane (pn); 1,2-diaminopropane (ap) and 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline (Me2-phen). Based on the elemental analyses, spectroscopic studies, magnetic moments (at room temperature) and molar conductivity measurements, extended oxamido-bridged structures consisting of a copper(Ⅱ) and an iron(Ⅱ) ions, which have a square planar environment and an octahedral environment, respectively, are proposed for these complexes. Complexes [Cu(oxap)Fe(en)2]SO4 (1) and [Cu(oxap)Fe(pn)2]SO4 (2) have been characterized by variable temperature magnetic susceptibility (4.2~300 K) and the observed data were least-squares fitted to the susceptibility equation derived from the spin Hamiltonian including single-ion zero-field interaction for the iron(Ⅱ) ion, H=-2JS1.S2-DSzl2, giving the exchange integrals J=-2     

一种新型顺式异三核金属[Cu-Mn-Cu]配合物合成、晶体结构和磁性

合成了一种新型不对称Schiff碱铜前体配合物KCuL和一种化学组成为[(CuL)2Mn (H2O)2]·0.5CH3OH·0.5CH3OH的顺式异三核配合物,并通过元素分析、IR谱的方法对其进行了表征（其中H3L = N-(2-{[(1E)-(5-氯-2-羟基苯基)亚甲基]胺基}乙基)-2-羟基苯甲酰胺）。利用X-射线单晶衍射方法对三核配合物的晶体结构进行了测定。该三核配合物的每一晶胞单元含有一个顺式中性异三核分子和两个无序的甲醇分子。中心锰离子Mn2+处于O6形成的变形八面体几何构型,而两个配阴离子[CuL]-在Mn2+周围呈顺式排布。磁性表明该三核配合物不仅具有分子内反铁磁作用,而且三核单元之间具有弱的铁磁交换作用,磁参数分别为J = -12.1 cm-1, g = 2.20 and zj¢ = 1.37 cm-1.     

Elucidating the 2D Magnetic Topology of the ‘Metal–Radical’ TTTA⋅Cu(hfac)2 System

The TTTA ? Cu(hfac)₂ polymer ( 1 ; in which TTTA=1,3,5‐trithia‐2,4,6‐triazapentalenyl, and hfac=(1,1,1,5,5,5)‐hexafluoroacetylacetonate) is one of the most prominent examples of the rational use of the ‘metal–radical’ synthetic approach to achieve ferromagnetic interactions. Experimentally, the magnetic topology of 1 could not be fully deciphered. Herein, the first‐principles bottom‐up procedure was applied to elucidate the nature and strength of the magnetic J_AB exchange interactions present in 1 . The computed J_AB values give rise to a 2D magnetic topology of ferromagnetic dimers (+11.9 cm^?1) coupled through weaker antiferromagnetic interactions (?3.0 and ?3.2 cm^?1) in two different spatial directions. The hitherto unknown origin of the antiferromagnetic interdimer interactions is thus unveiled. By using the 2D magnetic topology, the agreement between calculated and experimental χT(T) data is extraordinary. In the metal–radical TTTA ? Cu(hfac)₂ compound, the computational model transcends the local dimer cluster model owing to strong interactions between metal centers and organic radicals, thereby creating a de facto biradical. In addition, it is shown that the magnetic topology cannot be inferred from the polymeric [TTTA ??? Cu(hfac)₂]_n crystal motif, that is, from its chemical coordination pattern. Instead, one should think in terms of magnetic building blocks, namely, the de facto biradicals.     

Synthesis and Characterization of Copper(II) and Zinc(II) Tricyanomethanide (tcm) Complexes with Di(2‐pyridyl)amine (dpyam) as Co‐ligands: [Cu(dpyam)(tcm)2], [Cu(dpyam)(tcm)(OAc)] and Zn(dpyam)2(tcm)2

Three new transition metal tricyanomethanide complexes [Cu(dpyam)(tcm)₂] ( 1 ), [Cu(dpyam)(tcm)(OAc)] ( 2 ) and Zn(dpyam)₂(tcm)₂ ( 3 ) were synthesized and characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. In 1 each copper(II) atom is coordinated to three tcm anions and one dpyam molecule to form a square pyramide geometry. In 2 the coordination geometry around the central metal is also square pyramidal, and each copper atom is surrounded by two tcm anions, one dpyam ligand and one OAc. Both 1 and 2 display a µ_1,5‐tcm bridged infinite chain structure. In 3 each zinc(II) atom is coordinated by two tcm anions and two dpyam molecules to form a distorted octahedral geometry. Different from the former two complexes, 3 shows a mononuclear structure. Magnetic susceptibility measurement in the range 2–300 K indicates that there are weak antiferromagnetic couplings between adjacent copper(II) ions in 1 (J=?0.03 cm^?1) and 2 (J=?0.11 cm^?1) respectively.     

Hydrogen‐Bond‐Based Magnetic Exchange Between μ‐Diethylnicotinamide(aqua)bis(X‐salicylato)copper(II) Polymeric Chains

Polymeric salicylatocopper(II) complexes of unusual composition [C u(X‐ sal)₂( μ‐denia)(H₂O)]_n [denia = diethylnicotinamide, and X‐sal = 5‐methylsalicylate ( 1 ), 3‐methylsalicylate ( 2 ), 4‐methoxysalicylate ( 3 ), 3,5‐dichlorosalicylate ( 4 ) and 3,5‐dibromosalicylate ( 5 )] were synthesized and characterized. Magnetic measurements were performed in the temperature range 1.8–300 K. The structural unit of all complexes consists of a Cu^II atom, which is monodentately coordinated by the pair of X‐salicylate anions in trans positions. Water and the diethylnicotinamide ligand occupy the other two basal plane positions of the tetragonal pyramid. The axial positions are occupied by a diethylnicotinamide oxygen atom of neighboring structural units, thus forming a spiral polymeric structure parallel to b axis. Magnetic measurements showed that all complexes 1 – 5 exhibit a susceptibility maximum at about 6–8 K. The obtained data fit to Bleaney–Bowers equation gave singlet‐triplet energy gaps 2J = –8.60 cm^–1 for 1 , 2J = –6.57 cm^–1 for 2 , 2J = –8.57 cm^–1 for 3 , 2J = –6.82 cm^–1 for 4 , and 2J = –6.45 cm^–1 for 5 . The supramolecular structure based on hydrogen bonds [described by supramolecular synthons R₂²(10) and R₂²(12)] is the pathway for antiferromagnetic interactions of the magnetically coupled pairs of copper atoms of neighboring chains within the 2D supramolecular layers. The results of the magnetic measurements suggest involvement of the COO groups in the magnetic interaction pathway for all five complexes.     

Muconato‐bridged Manganese Coordination Polymer exhibiting rare Distorted‐trigonal Prismatic Coordination Arrangement

Novel poly[Mn(H₂O)(dmb)(muco)] ( 1 ) (H₂muco = trans,trans‐muconic acid; dmb = 5,5′‐dimethyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine) was obtained by self‐assembly, one‐pot, solution reaction. 1 crystallizes in a monoclinic system with P2₁ space group and forms an infinite one‐dimensional (1D) polymer. Remarkably, the six‐coordinate Mn^II display a rare distorted trigonal prismatic configuration. This unusual coordination arrangement appears to be acquired due to the supramolecular interactions of the polymeric structure of 1 , mainly throughout hydrogen bonding, giving rise to a 2D framework. Magnetic properties measurements reveal that 1 possesses weak antiferromagnetic interactions with θ_(C–W) = –1.0 K and J = 458 cm^–1.