Decomposition of technical and scale efficiencies in two-stage production systems

Conventional data envelopment analysis (DEA) models are used to measure the technical and scale efficiencies of a system when it is considered as a whole unit. This paper extends the efficiency measurement to two-stage systems where each stage has one process and all the outputs from the first process become the inputs of the second. An input-oriented DEA model for the first process is developed to separate the process efficiency into the input technical and scale efficiencies, and an output-oriented model is developed for the second process to separate the process efficiency into the output technical and scale efficiencies. Combining the two models, the system efficiency is expressed as the product of the overall technical and scale efficiencies, where the overall technical and scale efficiencies are the products of the corresponding efficiencies of the two processes, respectively. The detailed decomposition allows the sources of inefficiency to be identified.     

Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA

Kao and Hwang (2008) [Kao, C., Hwang, S.-N., 2008. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research 185 (1), 418–429] develop a data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach for measuring efficiency of decision processes which can be divided into two stages. The first stage uses inputs to generate outputs which become the inputs to the second stage. The first stage outputs are referred to as intermediate measures. The second stage then uses these intermediate measures to produce outputs. Kao and Huang represent the efficiency of the overall process as the product of the efficiencies of the two stages. A major limitation of this model is its applicability to only constant returns to scale (CRS) situations. The current paper develops an additive efficiency decomposition approach wherein the overall efficiency is expressed as a (weighted) sum of the efficiencies of the individual stages. This approach can be applied under both CRS and variable returns to scale (VRS) assumptions. The case of Taiwanese non-life insurance companies is revisited using this newly developed approach.     

外源投入型两阶段制造系统网络DEA效率分析研究

制造过程评价是改善制造系统效率的重要一环,传统的评价方法将每个制造系统决策单元视为黑箱来研究整体效率,忽略了中间产品转化信息及投入要素在各子过程中的配置信息。针对两阶段(第二阶段有外源性新投入)制造系统的效率评估问题,分别在固定规模报酬和可变规模报酬假设下,充分利用制造系统中间产品的转化及外源投入要素的配置信息,建立了制造系统网络DEA效率测度及分解模型,建模方法遵循客观评价原则,无需事先主观确定子效率和系统效率之间的组合关系。并将其应用于钢铁制造系统效率测度与分解,研究结果表明该方法能够挖掘决策单元内部子单元的效率情况,帮助决策者发现复杂制造过程非有效的根源,为复杂制造过程的整体效率测度及分解提供了有效的分析方法。     

Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition

In conventional DEA analysis, DMUs are generally treated as a black-box in the sense that internal structures are ignored, and the performance of a DMU is assumed to be a function of a set of chosen inputs and outputs. A significant body of work has been directed at problem settings where the DMU is characterized by a multistage process; supply chains and many manufacturing processes take this form. Recent DEA literature on serial processes has tended to concentrate on closed systems, that is, where the outputs from one stage become the inputs to the next stage, and where no other inputs enter the process at any intermediate stage. The current paper examines the more general problem of an open multistage process. Here, some outputs from a given stage may leave the system while others become inputs to the next stage. As well, new inputs can enter at any stage. We then extend the methodology to examine general network structures. We represent the overall efficiency of such a structure as an additive weighted average of the efficiencies of the individual components or stages that make up that structure. The model therefore allows one to evaluate not only the overall performance of the network, but as well represent how that performance decomposes into measures for the individual components of the network. We illustrate the model using two data sets.     

The effects of exogenous variables in efficiency measurement—A monte carlo study

A Monte Carlo study is conducted to compare the stochastic frontier method and the data envelopment analysis (DEA) method in measuring efficiency in situations where firms are subject to the effects of factors which are beyond managerial control. In making efficiency measurements and comparisons, one must separate the effects of the environment (the exogenous factors) and the effects of the productive efficiency. There are two basic approaches to account for the effects of exogenous variables: (1) an one-step procedure which includes the exogenous variables directly in estimating the efficiency measures, and (2) a two-step procedure which first estimates the relative ‘gross’ efficiencies using inputs and outputs, then analyzes the effects of the exogenous variables on the ‘gross’ efficiency. The results show that the magnitude of exogenous variables does not appear to have any significant effect on the performance of the one-step stochastic frontier method as long as the exogenous variables are correctly identified and accounted for. However, the effects of exogenous variables are significant for the two-step approach, especially for the DEA methods.     

Equivalence in two-stage DEA approaches

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a linear programming problem approach for evaluating the relative efficiency of peer decision making units (DMUs) that have multiple inputs and outputs. DMUs can have a two-stage structure where all the outputs from the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage, in addition to the inputs to the first stage and the outputs from the second stage. The outputs from the first stage to the second stage are called intermediate measures. This paper examines relations and equivalence between two existing DEA approaches that address measuring the performance of two-stage processes.     

DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has proved to be an excellent approach for measuring performance of decision making units (DMUs) that use multiple inputs to generate multiple outputs. In many real world scenarios, DMUs have a two-stage network process with shared input resources used in both stages of operations. For example, in hospital operations, some of the input resources such as equipment, personnel, and information technology are used in the first stage to generate medical record to track treatments, tests, drug dosages, and costs. The same set of resources used by first stage activities are used to generate the second-stage patient services. Patient services also use the services generated by the first stage operations of housekeeping, medical records, and laundry. These DMUs have not only inputs and outputs, but also intermediate measures that exist in-between the two-stage operations. The distinguishing characteristic is that some of the inputs to the first stage are shared by both the first and second stage, but some of the shared inputs cannot be conveniently split up and allocated to the operations of the two stages. Recognizing this distinction is critical for these types of DEA applications because measuring the efficiency of the production for first-stage outputs can be misleading and can understate the efficiency if DEA fails to consider that some of the inputs generate other second-stage outputs. The current paper develops a set of DEA models for measuring the performance of two-stage network processes with non splittable shared inputs. An additive efficiency decomposition for the two-stage network process is presented. The models are developed under the assumption of variable returns to scale (VRS), but can be readily applied under the assumption of constant returns to scale (CRS). An application is provided.     

Identifying the efficiency status in network DEA

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is commonly employed to evaluate the efficiency performance of a decision making unit (DMU) that transforms exogenous inputs into final outputs. In such a black-box DEA approach, details of an internal production process of the DMU are typically ignored and hence the locations of inefficiency are not adequately provided. In view of this, DEA researchers have recently developed various network approaches by looking into the black box, where the inputs that enter the box and the outputs that come out of it are only considered. However, most of these network approaches evaluate divisional efficiency by using an optimal solution of their respective optimization problem. If such an optimal solution is used in the case when there are multiple optima, then managerial guidance based on this solution alone may be inappropriate because more appropriate targets from the viewpoint of management may be ignored. Taking this fact into account, therefore, we propose a network approach for identifying the efficiency status of each DMU and its divisions. This approach provides a practical computational procedure.     

An inverse optimization model for imprecise data envelopment analysis

Inverse data envelopment analysis (InDEA) is a well-known approach for short-term forecasting of a given decision-making unit (DMU). The conventional InDEA models use the production possibility set (PPS) that is composed of an evaluated DMU with current inputs and outputs. In this paper, we replace the fluctuated DMU with a modified DMU involving renewal inputs and outputs in the PPS since the DMU with current data cannot be allowed to establish the new PPS. Besides, the classical DEA models such as InDEA are assumed to consider perfect knowledge of the input and output values but in numerous situations, this assumption may not be realistic. The observed values of the data in these situations can sometimes be defined as interval numbers instead of crisp numbers. Here, we extend the InDEA model to interval data for evaluating the relative efficiency of DMUs. The proposed models determine the lower and upper bounds of the inputs of a given DMU separately when its interval outputs are changed in the performance analysis process. We aim to remain the current interval efficiency of a considered DMU and the interval efficiencies of the remaining DMUs fixed or even improve compared with the current interval efficiencies.     

Evaluating the performances of decision-making units based on interval efficiencies

Efficiency could be not only the ratio of weighted sum of outputs to that of inputs but also that of weighted sum of inputs to that of outputs. When the previous efficiency measures the best relative efficiency within the range of no more than one, the decision-making units (DMUs) who get the optimum value of one perform best among all the DMUs. If the previous efficiency is measured within the range of no less than one, the DMUs who get the optimum value of one perform worst among all the DMUs. When the later efficiency is measured within the range of no more than one, the DMUs who get the optimum value of one perform worst among all the DMUs. If the later efficiency is measured within the range of no less than one, the DMUs who get the optimum value of one perform best among all the DMUs. This paper mainly studies an interval DEA model with later efficiency, in which efficiency is measured within the range of an interval, whose upper bound is set to one and the lower bound is determined by introducing a virtual ideal DMU, whose performance is definitely superior to any DMUs. The efficiencies, obtained from interval DEA model, turn out to be all intervals and are referred to as interval efficiencies, which combine the best and the worst relative efficiency in a reasonable manner to give an overall assessment of performances for all DMUs. Assessor's preference information on input and output weights is also incorporated into interval DEA model reasonably and conveniently. Through an example, some differences are found from the ranking results obtained from interval DEA model and bounded DEA model using the Hurwicz criterion approach to rank the interval efficiencies.     

A modified slacks-based measure model for data envelopment analysis with ‘natural’ negative outputs and inputs

This paper is primarily concerned with data envelopment analysis (DEA) of systems where negative outputs and negative inputs arise naturally. Examples of situations in which both negative inputs and negative outputs occur are given. More attention has been paid, in the literature, to the former type of problem. Most available DEA software does not solve this type of problem or copes with negative outputs and possibly negative inputs by assigning zero weights to them. A modified slacks-based measure (MSBM) model is presented, in which both negative outputs and negative inputs occur. The MSBM model overcomes the lack of translation invariance in the slacks-based measure model by drawing on the ideas from the range directional model (RDM). The MSBM model takes into account individual input and output slacks, which provides more precise evaluation of inefficient decision-making units (DMUs). It therefore, generally leads to lower efficiencies for inefficient DMUs than the RDM.     

Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for measuring the efficiency of peer decision making units (DMUs). Recently DEA has been extended to examine the efficiency of two-stage processes, where all the outputs from the first stage are intermediate measures that make up the inputs to the second stage. The resulting two-stage DEA model provides not only an overall efficiency score for the entire process, but as well yields an efficiency score for each of the individual stages. Due to the existence of intermediate measures, the usual procedure of adjusting the inputs or outputs by the efficiency scores, as in the standard DEA approach, does not necessarily yield a frontier projection. The current paper develops an approach for determining the frontier points for inefficient DMUs within the framework of two-stage DEA.     

Supply chain performance evaluation using fuzzy network data envelopment analysis: a case study in automotive industry

Supply chain performance evaluation problems are evaluated using data envelopment analysis. This paper proposes a fuzzy network epsilon-based data envelopment analysis for supply chain performance evaluation. In the common data envelopment analysis models which are used for evaluation of decision-maker units efficiency, there are several inputs and outputs. One of the bugs of such models is that the intermediate products and linking activities are overlooked. Considering these intermediate activities and products, the current study evaluates the performance of decision-maker units in an automotive supply chain. There are ten decision-maker units in the supply chain in which there are three suppliers, two manufacturers, two distributors, and four customers. Moreover, the overall efficiency of input-oriented (input-based) model and input-oriented divisional efficiency are calculated. In order to improve the efficiencies, the projections onto the frontiers are obtained by using the outputs of the solved model and Lingo software. In order to show the applicability of the proposed model, it is applied on automotive industry, as a case study, to evaluate supply chain performance. Then, the overall efficiencies of DMUs and each sections (divisions) of DMUs were calculated separately. Therefore, every organization can apply this evaluation method for improving the performance of alternative factors.

     

Two-stage network DEA: when intermediate measures can be treated as outputs from the second stage

This paper investigates efficiency measurement in a two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) setting. Since 1978, DEA literature has witnessed the expansion of the original concept to encompass a wide range of theoretical and applied research areas. One such area is network DEA, and in particular two-stage DEA. In the conventional closed serial system, the only role played by the outputs from Stage 1 is to behave as inputs to Stage 2. The current paper examines a variation of that system. In particular, we consider settings where the set of final outputs comprises not only those that result from Stage 2, but can include, in addition, certain outputs from the previous (first) stage. The difficulty that this situation creates is that such outputs are attempting to play both an input and output role in the same stage. We develop a DEA-based methodology that is designed to handle what we term ‘time-staged outputs’. We then examine an application of this concept where the DMUs are schools of business.     

Resolving a strange case of efficiency

In a recent paper in the Journal of the Operational Research Society, Tone proposes an alternative to the Farrell cost efficiency index to avoid the ‘strange case’ problem in which firms with identical inputs and outputs but with input prices differing by some factor (eg, one has input prices twice another) will have the same Farrell cost efficiency. We provide an alternative cost efficiency indicator that avoids this problem, allows for decomposition into technical and allocative efficiency, and is easily estimated using DEA type models.     

Are economically advanced countries more efficient in basic and applied research?

Research and development (R&D) of countries play a major role in a long-term development of the economy. We measure the R&D efficiency of all 28 member countries of the European Union in the years 2008–2014. Super-efficient data envelopment analysis (DEA) based on robustness of classification into efficient and inefficient units is adopted. We use the number of citations as output of basic research, the number of patents as output of applied research and R&D expenditures with manpower as inputs. To meet DEA assumptions and to capture R&D characteristics, we analyze a homogeneous sample of countries, adjust prices using purchasing power parity and consider time lag between inputs and outputs. We find that the efficiency of general R&D is higher for countries with higher GDP per capita. This relation also holds for specialized efficiencies of basic and applied research. However, it is much stronger for applied research suggesting its outputs are more easily distinguished and captured. Our findings are important in the evaluation of research and policy making.     

Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model

Traditional studies in data envelopment analysis (DEA) view systems as a whole when measuring the efficiency, ignoring the operation of individual processes within a system. This paper builds a relational network DEA model, taking into account the interrelationship of the processes within the system, to measure the efficiency of the system and those of the processes at the same time. The system efficiency thus measured more properly represents the aggregate performance of the component processes. By introducing dummy processes, the original network system can be transformed into a series system where each stage in the series is of a parallel structure. Based on these series and parallel structures, the efficiency of the system is decomposed into the product of the efficiencies of the stages in the series and the inefficiency slack of each stage into the sum of the inefficiency slacks of its component processes connected in parallel. With efficiency decomposition, the process which causes the inefficient operation of the system can be identified for future improvement. An example of the non-life insurance industry in Taiwan illustrates the whole idea.     

Finding strong defining hyperplanes of Production Possibility Set

Production Possibility Set (PPS) is defined as the set of all inputs and outputs of a system in which inputs can produce outputs. Data Envelopment Analysis models implicitly use PPS to evaluate relative efficiency of Decision Making Units (DMUs). Although DEA models can determine the efficiency of a DMU, they cannot present efficient frontiers of PPS. In this paper, we propose a method for finding all Strong Defining Hyperplanes of PPS (SDHP). They are equations that form efficient surfaces. These equations are useful in Sensitivity and Stability Analysis, the status of Returns to Scale of a DMU, incorporating performance information into the efficient frontier analysis and so on.     

Determining sources of relative inefficiency in heterogeneous samples: Methodology using Cluster Analysis,DEA and Neural Networks

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a powerful data analytic tool that is widely used by researchers and practitioners alike to assess relative performance of Decision Making Units (DMU). Commonly, the difference in the scores of relative performance of DMUs in the sample is considered to reflect their differences in the efficiency of conversion of inputs into outputs. In the presence of scale heterogeneity, however, the source of the difference in scores becomes less clear, for it is also possible that the difference in scores is caused by heterogeneity of the levels of inputs and outputs of DMUs in the sample. By augmenting DEA with Cluster Analysis (CA) and Neural Networks (NN), we propose a five-step methodology allowing an investigator to determine whether the difference in the scores of scale heterogeneous DMUs is due to the heterogeneity of the levels of inputs and outputs, or whether it is caused by their efficiency of conversion of inputs into outputs. An illustrative example demonstrates the application of the proposed methodology in action.     

Two-stage cooperation model with input freely distributed among the stages

Shared flow has been widely used in production scenarios where inputs and outputs are shared among various activities. In DEA literature, shared flow represents situations that DMUs are divided into different components that require common resources or produce goods or services obtained through collaboration among them. The objective of this paper is to offer an approach for studying shared flow in a two-stage production process in series, where shared inputs can be freely allocated among different stages. A product-form cooperative efficiency model is proposed to illustrate the overall efficiency of the DMU, and the relationship between the stages. First, we use a game-theory framework to decide the upper and lower bounds of the efficiencies of the stages in a non-cooperative context. A heuristic is suggested to transform the non-linear model into a parametric linear one, which is then used to solve the cooperative model. The model is justified by a numerical evaluation of bank performances.