Bipartite rainbow numbers of matchings

Given two graphs G and H, let f(G,H) denote the maximum number c for which there is a way to color the edges of G with c colors such that every subgraph H of G has at least two edges of the same color. Equivalently, any edge-coloring of G with at least rb(G,H)=f(G,H)+1 colors contains a rainbow copy of H, where a rainbow subgraph of an edge-colored graph is such that no two edges of it have the same color. The number rb(G,H) is called the rainbow number ofHwith respect toG, and simply called the bipartite rainbow number ofH if G is the complete bipartite graph K_m,n. Erd?s, Simonovits and Sós showed that rb(K_n,K₃)=n. In 2004, Schiermeyer determined the rainbow numbers rb(K_n,K_k) for all n≥k≥4, and the rainbow numbers rb(K_n,kK₂) for all k≥2 and n≥3k+3. In this paper we will determine the rainbow numbers rb(K_m,n,kK₂) for all k≥1.     

The equivariant topology of stable Kneser graphs

The stable Kneser graph SG_n,k, n?1, k?0, introduced by Schrijver (1978) [19], is a vertex critical graph with chromatic number k+2, its vertices are certain subsets of a set of cardinality m=2n+k. Björner and de Longueville (2003) [5] have shown that its box complex is homotopy equivalent to a sphere, Hom(K₂,SG_n,k)?Sk. The dihedral group D2m acts canonically on SG_n,k, the group C₂ with 2 elements acts on K₂. We almost determine the (C₂×D2m)-homotopy type of Hom(K₂,SG_n,k) and use this to prove the following results.The graphs SG_2s,4 are homotopy test graphs, i.e. for every graph H and r?0 such that Hom(SG_2s,4,H) is (r−1)-connected, the chromatic number χ(H) is at least r+6.If k∉{0,1,2,4,8} and n?N(k) then SG_n,k is not a homotopy test graph, i.e. there are a graph G and an r?1 such that Hom(SG_n,k,G) is (r−1)-connected and χ(G)<r+k+2.     

On weights of induced paths and cycles in claw‐free and K1,r‐free graphs

Let G be a K_1,r ‐free graph (r ≥ 3) on n vertices. We prove that, for any induced path or induced cycle on k vertices in G (k ≥ 2r − 1 or k ≥ 2r, respectively), the degree sum of its vertices is at most (2r − 2)(n − α) where α is the independence number of G. As a corollary we obtain an upper bound on the length of a longest induced path and a longest induced cycle in a K_1,r ‐free graph. Stronger bounds are given in the special case of claw‐free graphs (i.e., r = 3). Sharpness examples are also presented. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 36: 131–143, 2001     

Generalised Ramsey numbers for small graphs

The generalised Ramsey number R(G₁, G₂,..., G_k) is defined as the smallest integer n such that, if the edges of K_n, the complete graph on n vertices, are coloured using k colours C₁, C₂,..., C_k, then for some i(1≤i≤k) there is a subgraph G_i of K_n with all of its edges colour C_i. When G₁=G₂=...,G_k=G, we use the more compact notation R_k(G).The generalised Ramsey numbers R_k(G) are investigated for all graphs G having at most four vertices (and no isolates). This extends the work of Chvátal and Harary, who made this investigation in the case k=2.     

A Degree Sequence Variant of Graph Ramsey Numbers

A (finite) sequence of nonnegative integers is graphic if it is the degree sequence of some simple graph G. Given graphs G ₁ and G ₂, we consider the smallest integer k such that for every k-term graphic sequence π, there is some graph G with degree sequence π with \({G_1 \subseteq G}\) or with \({G_2 \subseteq \overline{G}}\) . When the phrase “some graph” in the prior sentence is replaced with “all graphs”, the smallest such integer k is the classical Ramsey number r(G ₁, G ₂). Thus we call this parameter for degree sequences the potential-Ramsey number and denote it r _pot (G ₁, G ₂). In this paper, we give exact values for r _pot (K _n , K _t ), r _pot (C _n , K _t ), and r _pot (P _n ,K _t ) and consider situations where r _pot (G ₁,G ₂) =  r(G ₁,G ₂).     

On three zero-sum Ramsey-type problems

For a graph G whose number of edges is divisible by k, let R(G,Z_k) denote the minimum integer r such that for every function f: E(K_r) ? Z_k there is a copy G¹ of G in K_r so that Σe∈E(G¹) f(e) = 0 (in Z_k). We prove that for every integer k₁ R(K_n, Z_k) ≤ n + O(k³ log k) provided n is sufficiently large as a function of k and k divides (). If, in addition, k is an odd prime-power then R(K_n, Z_k) ≤ n + 2k - 2 and this is tight if k is a prime that divides n. A related result is obtained for hypergraphs. It is further shown that for every graph G on n vertices with an even number of edges R(G,Z₂) ≤ n + 2. This estimate is sharp. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

On extremal k-outconnected graphs

Let G be a minimally k-connected graph with n nodes and m edges. Mader proved that if n?3k-2 then m?k(n-k), and for n?3k-1 an equality is possible if, and only if, G is the complete bipartite graph K_k,n-k. Cai proved that if n?3k-2 then m?⌊(n+k)²/8⌋, and listed the cases when this bound is tight.In this paper we prove a more general theorem, which implies similar results for minimally k-outconnected graphs; a graph is called k-outconnected from r if it contains k internally disjoint paths from r to every other node.     

Star-critical Ramsey numbers

The graph Ramsey numberR(G,H) is the smallest integer r such that every 2-coloring of the edges of K_r contains either a red copy of G or a blue copy of H. We find the largest star that can be removed from K_r such that the underlying graph is still forced to have a red G or a blue H. Thus, we introduce the star-critical Ramsey numberr_∗(G,H) as the smallest integer k such that every 2-coloring of the edges of K_r−K_1,r−1−k contains either a red copy of G or a blue copy of H. We find the star-critical Ramsey number for trees versus complete graphs, multiple copies of K₂ and K₃, and paths versus a 4-cycle. In addition to finding the star-critical Ramsey numbers, the critical graphs are classified for R(T_n,K_m), R(nK₂,mK₂) and R(P_n,C₄).     

Partitioning complete multipartite graphs by monochromatic trees

The tree partition number of an r‐edge‐colored graph G, denoted by t_r(G), is the minimum number k such that whenever the edges of G are colored with r colors, the vertices of G can be covered by at most k vertex‐disjoint monochromatic trees. We determine t₂(K(n₁, n₂,…, n_k)) of the complete k‐partite graph K(n₁, n₂,…, n_k). In particular, we prove that t₂(K(n, m)) = ? (m‐2)/2ⁿ? + 2, where 1 ≤ n ≤ m. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 48: 133–141, 2005     

Some remarks on the odd hadwiger’s conjecture

We say that H has an odd complete minor of order at least l if there are l vertex disjoint trees in H such that every two of them are joined by an edge, and in addition, all the vertices of trees are two-colored in such a way that the edges within the trees are bichromatic, but the edges between trees are monochromatic. Gerards and Seymour conjectured that if a graph has no odd complete minor of order l, then it is (l ? 1)-colorable. This is substantially stronger than the well-known conjecture of Hadwiger. Recently, Geelen et al. proved that there exists a constant c such that any graph with no odd K _k -minor is ck√logk-colorable. However, it is not known if there exists an absolute constant c such that any graph with no odd K _k -minor is ck-colorable. Motivated by these facts, in this paper, we shall first prove that, for any k, there exists a constant f(k) such that every (496k + 13)-connected graph with at least f(k) vertices has either an odd complete minor of size at least k or a vertex set X of order at most 8k such that G–X is bipartite. Since any bipartite graph does not contain an odd complete minor of size at least three, the second condition is necessary. This is an analogous result of Böhme et al. We also prove that every graph G on n vertices has an odd complete minor of size at least n/2α(G) ? 1, where α(G) denotes the independence number of G. This is an analogous result of Duchet and Meyniel. We obtain a better result for the case α(G)= 3.     

Connected Resolvability of Graphs

For an ordered set W = {w ₁, w ₂,..., w _k} of vertices and a vertex v in a connected graph G, the representation of v with respect to W is the k-vector r(v|W) = (d(v, w ₁), d(v, w ₂),... d(v, w _k)), where d(x, y) represents the distance between the vertices x and y. The set W is a resolving set for G if distinct vertices of G have distinct representations with respect to W. A resolving set for G containing a minimum number of vertices is a basis for G. The dimension dim(G) is the number of vertices in a basis for G. A resolving set W of G is connected if the subgraph 〈W〉 induced by W is a nontrivial connected subgraph of G. The minimum cardinality of a connected resolving set in a graph G is its connected resolving number cr(G). Thus 1 ≤ dim(G) ≤ cr(G) ≤ n?1 for every connected graph G of order n ≥ 3. The connected resolving numbers of some well-known graphs are determined. It is shown that if G is a connected graph of order n ≥ 3, then cr(G) = n?1 if and only if G = K _n or G = K _1,n?1. It is also shown that for positive integers a, b with a ≤ b, there exists a connected graph G with dim(G) = a and cr(G) = b if and only if $\left( {a,b} \right) \notin \left\{ {\left( {1,k} \right):k = 1\;{\text{or}}\;k \geqslant 3} \right\}$ Several other realization results are present. The connected resolving numbers of the Cartesian products G × K ₂ for connected graphs G are studied.     

Properties of connected graphs having minimum degree distance

The degree distance of a connected graph, introduced by Dobrynin, Kochetova and Gutman, has been studied in mathematical chemistry. In this paper some properties of graphs having minimum degree distance in the class of connected graphs of order n and size m≥n−1 are deduced. It is shown that any such graph G has no induced subgraph isomorphic to P₄, contains a vertex z of degree n−1 such that G−z has at most one connected component C such that |C|≥2 and C has properties similar to those of G.For any fixed k such that k=0,1 or k≥3, if m=n+k and n≥k+3 then the extremal graph is unique and it is isomorphic to K₁+(K_1,k+1∪(n−k−3)K₁).     

Posets and planar graphs

A k-decomposition (G₁,…,G_k) of a graph G is a partition of its edge set to form k spanning subgraphs G₁,…,G_k. The classical theorem of Nordhaus and Gaddum bounds χ(G₁) + χ(G₂) and χ(G₁)χ(G₂) over all 2-decompositions of K_n. For a graph parameter p, let p(k;G) denote the maximum of over all k-decompositions of the graph G. The clique number ω, chromatic number χ, list chromatic number χℓ, and Szekeres–Wilf number σ satisfy ω(2;K_n) = χ(2;K_n) = χℓ(2;K_n) = σ(2;K_n) = n + 1. We obtain lower and upper bounds for ω(k;K_n), χ(k;K_n), χℓ(k;K_n), and σ(k;K_n). The last three behave differently for large k. We also obtain lower and upper bounds for the maximum of χ(k;G) over all graphs embedded on a given surface. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

Connected matroids with the smallest whitney numbers

In “The Slimmest Geometric Lattices” (Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.). Dowling and Wilson showed that if G is a combinatorial geometry of rank r(G) = n, and if _X(G) = Σμ(0, x)λ^{r ? r(x)} = Σ (?1)^{r ? k}W_kλ^k is the characteristic polynomial of G, then

$\text{w}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{?}\text{r}\text{k}\text{+n}\text{r?1}\text{k}$

Thus γ(G) ? 2^{r ? 1} (n+2), where γ(G) = Σw_k. In this paper we sharpen these lower bounds for connected geometries: If G is connected, r(G) ? 3, and n(G) ? 2 ((r, n) ≠ (4,3)), then

$\text{w}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{r}\text{i}\text{+ n}\text{r}\text{i+1}\text{for i>1; w}{}_1\text{?r+n}\text{r}\text{2}\text{? 1;}$

|μ| ? (r? 1)n; and γ ? (2^{r ? 1} ? 1)(2n + 2). These bounds are all achieved for the parallel connection of an r-point circuit and an (n + 1)point line. If G is any series-parallel network, $\text{r(G) = r(}\text{G}\text{?}\text{) = 4}$, and $\text{n(G) = n(}\text{G}\text{?}\text{) = 3}$ then $\text{(w}{}_1\text{(G))}{}^4{}_{\mathrm{t-G}}\text{? (w}{}_1\text{(}\text{G}\text{?}\text{)) = (8, 20, 18, 7, 1)}$. Further, if β is the Crapo invariant,

$\text{β(G)=}\text{d}{}_{\mathrm{X}}\text{(G)}\text{dλ}\text{(1)}\text{,}$

then β(G) ? max(1, n ? r + 2). This lower bound is achieved by the parallel connection of a line and a maximal size series-parallel network.     

Nonorientable genus of nearly complete bipartite graphs

LetG(m, n, k), m, n≥3,k≤min(m, n), be the graph obtained from the complete bipartite graphK _m,n by deleting an arbitrary set ofk independent edges, and let $$f(m,n,k) = [(m - 2)(n - 2) - k]/2.$$ It is shown that the nonorientable genus \(\tilde \gamma \) (G(m, n, k)) of the graphG(m, n, k) is equal to the upper integer part off(m, n, k), except in trivial cases wheref(m, n, k)≤0 and possibly in some extreme cases, the graphsG(k, k, k) andG(k + 1,k, k). These cases are also discussed, obtaining some positive and some negative results. In particular, it is shown thatG(5, 4, 4) andG(5, 5, 5) have no nonorientable quadrilateral embedding.     

On the odd harmonious graphs with applications

The necessary conditions for the existence of odd harmonious labelling of graph are obtained. A cycle C _n is odd harmonious if and only if n≡0 (mod 4). A complete graph K _n is odd harmonious if and only if n=2. A complete k-partite graph K(n ₁,n ₂,…,n _k ) is odd harmonious if and only if k=2. A windmill graph K _n ^t is odd harmonious if and only if n=2. The construction ways of odd harmonious graph are given. We prove that the graph ∨ _i=1 ⁿ G _i , the graph G(+r ₁,+r ₂,…,+r _p ), the graph $\bar{K_{m}}+_{0}P_{n}+_{e}\bar{K_{t}}$ , the graph G∪(X+∪ _k=1 ⁿ Y _k ), some trees and the product graph P _m ×P _n etc. are odd harmonious. The odd harmoniousness of graph can be used to solve undetermined equation.     

Spectral bounds for the clique and independence numbers of graphs

We obtain a sequence k₁(G) ≤ k₂(G) ≤ … ≤ k_n(G) of lower bounds for the clique number (size of the largest clique) of a graph G of n vertices. The bounds involve the spectrum of the adjacency matrix of G. The bound k₁(G) is explicit and improves earlier known theorems. The bound k₂(G) is also explicit, and is shown to improve on the bound from Brooks' theorem even for regular graphs. The bounds k₃,…, k_r are polynomial-time computable, where r is the number of positive eigenvalues of G.     

Characterizations of n-connected and n-line connected graphs

The following two theorems are proved: (1) A graph G with at least n + 1 points, n ≥ 2, is n-connected if and only if for each set S of n distinct points of G and for each two point subset T of S there is a cycle of G that contains the points of T and avoids the points of S ? T. (2) A graph G with at least n + 1 lines, n ≥ 2, with no isolated points is n-line connected if and only if for each set S of n distinct lines of G and for each two line subset T of S there is a circuit of G that contains the lines of T and avoids the lines of S ? T.     

The number of Hamiltonian circuits

G = 〈V(G), E(G)〉 denotes a directed graph without loops and multiple arrows. $\text{K}$(G) denotes the set of all Hamiltonian circuits of G. Put H(n, r) = max{|E(G)|, |V(G)| = n, 1 ≤ |$\text{K}$(G)| ≤ r}. Theorem: $\text{H(n, 1) = (}\text{n}{}^2\text{2}\text{) + (}\text{n}\text{2}\text{) ?1}$. Further, H(n, 2),…, H(n, 5) are given.