The Intermolecular S?H⋅⋅⋅Y (Y=S,O) Hydrogen Bond in the H2S Dimer and the H2S–MeOH Complex

The nature of the S? H???S hydrogen‐bonding interaction in the H₂S dimer and its structure has been the focus of several theoretical studies. This is partly due to its structural similarity and close relationship with the well‐studied water dimer and partly because it represents the simplest prototypical example of hydrogen bonding involving a sulfur atom. Although there is some IR data on the H₂S dimer and higher homomers from cold matrix experiments, there are no IR spectroscopic reports on S? H???S hydrogen bonding in the gas phase to‐date. We present experimental evidence using VUV ionization‐detected IR‐predissociation spectroscopy (VUV‐ID‐IRPDS) for this weak hydrogen‐bonding interaction in the H₂S dimer. The proton‐donating S? H bond is found to be red‐shifted by 31 cm^?1. We were also able to observe and assign the symmetric (ν₁) stretch of the acceptor and an unresolved feature owing to the free S? H of the donor and the antisymmetric (ν₃) SH stretch of the acceptor. In addition we show that the heteromolecular H₂S–MeOH complex, for which both S? H???O and O? H???S interactions are possible, is S‐H???O bound.     

Crystallographic characterization of the first reported crystalline form of the potent hallucinogen (R)‐2‐amino‐1‐(8‐bromobenzo[1,2‐b;5,4‐b′]difuran‐4‐yl)propane or `bromodragonfly': the 1:1 anhydrous proton‐transfer compound with 3,5‐dinitrosalicylic acid

The 1:1 proton‐transfer compound of the potent substituted amphetamine hallucinogen (R)‐2‐amino‐1‐(8‐bromobenzo[1,2‐b;5,4‐b′]difuran‐4‐yl)propane (common trivial name `bromodragonfly') with 3,5‐dinitrosalicylic acid, namely 1‐(8‐bromobenzo[1,2‐b;5,4‐b′]difuran‐4‐yl)propan‐2‐aminium 2‐carboxy‐4,6‐dinitrophenolate, C₁₃H₁₃BrNO₂⁺·C₇H₃N₂O₇⁻, forms hydrogen‐bonded cation–anion chain substructures comprising undulating head‐to‐tail anion chains formed through C(8) carboxyl–nitro O—H...O associations and incorporating the aminium groups of the cations. The intrachain cation–anion hydrogen‐bonding associations feature proximal cyclic R₃³(8) interactions involving both an N⁺—H...O_phenolate and the carboxyl–nitro O—H...O associations and aromatic π–π ring interactions [minimum ring centroid separation = 3.566 (2) Å]. A lateral hydrogen‐bonding interaction between the third aminium H atom and a carboxyl O‐atom acceptor links the chain substructures, giving a two‐dimensional sheet structure. This determination represents the first of any form of this compound and is in the (R) absolute configuration. The atypical crystal stability is attributed both to the hydrogen‐bonded chain substructures provided by the anions, which accommodate the aminium proton‐donor groups of the cations and give crosslinking, and to the presence of the cation–anion aromatic ring π–π interactions.     

Mixed dicationic and monocationic benzidine species in the proton‐transfer compound of benzidine with 3,5‐dinitro­salicylic acid

The crystal structure of the proton‐transfer compound of 1,1′‐biphenyl‐4,4′‐diamine (benzidine) with 3,5‐dinitro­salicylic acid, viz. 1,1′‐biphenyl‐4,4′‐diaminium bis­(4′‐amino‐1,1′‐bi­phenyl‐4‐aminium) tetra­kis(2‐carb­oxy‐4,6‐dinitro­phenol­ate) ethanol disolvate, C₁₂H₁₄N₂²⁺·2C₁₂H₁₃N₂⁺·4C₇H₃N₂O₇⁻·2C₂H₆O, shows the presence of both diprotonated and monoprotonated benzidine cations. The diprotonated species lie across crystallographic inversion centres in the unit cell, while the monoprotonated species occupy general sites. All amine H atoms participate in hydrogen bonding with carboxyl, phenolate and nitro O‐atom acceptors of the salicylate anions, which also participate in hydrogen bonding with the disordered ethanol solvent mol­ecules. Significant inter‐ring anion–anion and anion–monocation π–π inter­actions are also present, giving a three‐dimensional framework structure.     

Proton transfer versus nontransfer in compounds of the diazo‐dye precursor 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline (aniline yellow) with strong organic acids: the 5‐sulfosalicylate and the dichroic benzenesulfonate salts,and the 1:2 adduct with 3,5‐dinitrobenzoic acid

The structures of two 1:1 proton‐transfer red–black dye compounds formed by reaction of aniline yellow [4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline] with 5‐sulfosalicylic acid and benzenesulfonic acid, and a 1:2 nontransfer adduct compound with 3,5‐dinitrobenzoic acid have been determined at either 130 or 200 K. The compounds are 2‐(4‐aminophenyl)‐1‐phenylhydrazin‐1‐ium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate methanol solvate, C₁₂H₁₂N₃⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·CH₃OH, (I), 2‐(4‐aminophenyl)‐1‐phenylhydrazin‐1‐ium 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium bis(benzenesulfonate), 2C₁₂H₁₂N₃⁺·2C₆H₅O₃S⁻, (II), and 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline–3,5‐dinitrobenzoic acid (1/2), C₁₂H₁₁N₃·2C₇H₄N₂O₆, (III). In compound (I), the diazenyl rather than the aniline group of aniline yellow is protonated, and this group subsequently takes part in a primary hydrogen‐bonding interaction with a sulfonate O‐atom acceptor, producing overall a three‐dimensional framework structure. A feature of the hydrogen bonding in (I) is a peripheral edge‐on cation–anion association also involving aromatic C—H...O hydrogen bonds, giving a conjoint R¹₂(6)R¹₂(7)R²₁(4) motif. In the dichroic crystals of (II), one of the two aniline yellow species in the asymmetric unit is diazenyl‐group protonated, while in the other the aniline group is protonated. Both of these groups form hydrogen bonds with sulfonate O‐atom acceptors and these, together with other associations, give a one‐dimensional chain structure. In compound (III), rather than proton transfer, there is preferential formation of a classic R²₂(8) cyclic head‐to‐head hydrogen‐bonded carboxylic acid homodimer between the two 3,5‐dinitrobenzoic acid molecules, which, in association with the aniline yellow molecule that is disordered across a crystallographic inversion centre, results in an overall two‐dimensional ribbon structure. This work has shown the correlation between structure and observed colour in crystalline aniline yellow compounds, illustrated graphically in the dichroic benzenesulfonate compound.     

The proton‐transfer compounds of strychnine with achiral salicylic acids: strychninium 3,5‐dinitro­salicylate and the strychninium 5‐nitro­salicylate bis­(5‐nitro­salicylic acid) adduct

In the crystal structures of the proton‐transfer compounds of strychnine with 3,5‐dinitro­salicylic acid, namely strychninium 3,5‐dinitro­salicylate, C₂₁H₂₃N₂O₂⁺·C₇H₃N₂O₇⁻, (I), and 5‐nitro­salicylic acid, namely strychninium–5‐nitro­salicylate–5‐nitro­salicylic acid (1/1/2), C₂₁H₂₃N₂O₂⁺·C₇H₄NO₅⁻·2C₇H₅NO₅, (II), protonation of one of the N atoms of the strychnine mol­ecule occurs and this group is subsequently involved in inter­molecular hydrogen‐bonding inter­actions. In (I), this is four‐centred, the primary being with an adjacent strychninium carbonyl O‐atom acceptor in a side‐to‐side inter­action giving linear chains. Other inter­actions are with the phenolate and nitro O‐atom acceptors of the anionic species, resulting in a one‐dimensional polymer structure. In (II), the N⁺—H inter­action is three‐centred, the hydrogen bonding involving carboxyl O‐atom acceptors of the anion and both acid adduct species, giving unique discrete hetero‐tetramer units. The structure of (II) also features π‐bonding inter­actions between the two acid adduct mol­ecules.     

Protonation of Pyridyl‐Substituted TTF Derivatives: Substituent Effects in Solution and in the Proton–Electron Correlated Charge‐Transfer Complexes

Protonated pyridyl‐substituted tetrathiafulvalene electron‐donor molecules (PyH⁺‐TTF) showed significant changes in the electron‐donating ability and HOMO–LUMO energy gap compared to the neutral analogues and gave a unique N⁺?H???N hydrogen‐bonded (H‐bonded) dimer unit in the proton–electron correlated charge‐transfer (CT) complex crystals. We have evaluated these features from the viewpoint of the molecular structure of the PyH⁺‐TTF derivatives, that is, the substitution position of the Py group and/or the presence or absence of the ethylenedithio (EDT) group. Among 2‐PyH⁺‐TTF ( 1 o H⁺ ), 3‐PyH⁺‐TTF ( 1 m H⁺ ), 4‐PyH⁺‐TTF ( 1 p H⁺ ), and 4‐PyH⁺‐EDT‐TTF ( 2 p H⁺ ) systems, the para‐pyridyl‐substituted donors 1 p H⁺ and 2 p H⁺ exhibit more marked changes upon protonation in solution; a larger redshift in the intramolecular CT absorption band and a larger decrease in the electron‐donating ability. Furthermore, the EDT system 2 p H⁺ has the smallest intramolecular Coulombic repulsion energy. These differences are reasonably interpreted by considering the energy levels and distributions of the HOMO and LUMO obtained by quantum chemical calculations. Such substituent effects related to protonation were also examined by comparing the structure and properties of a new H‐bonded CT complex crystal based on 2 p H⁺ with those of its 1 p H⁺ analogue recently prepared by us: Both of them form a similar type of H‐bonded dimer unit, however, its charge distribution as well as the overall molecular arrangement, electronic structure, and conductivity were significantly modulated by the introduction of the EDT group. These results provide a new insight into the structural and electronic features of the PyH⁺‐TTF‐based proton–electron correlated molecular conductors.     

Chiral Transformation in Protonated and Deprotonated Adipic Acids through Multistep Internal Proton Transfer

Protonated and deprotonated adipic acids (PAA: HOOC? (CH₂)₄? COOH₂⁺ and DAA: HOOC? (CH₂)₄? COO^?) have a charged hydrogen bond under the influence of steric constraint due to the molecular skeleton of a circular ring. Despite the similarity between PAA and DAA, it is surprising that the lowest energy structure of PAA is predicted to have (H₂O???H???OH₂)⁺ Zundel‐like symmetric hydrogen bonding, whereas that of DAA has H₃O⁺ Eigen‐like asymmetric hydrogen bonding. The energy profiles show that direct proton transfer between mirror image structures is unfavorable. Instead, the chiral transformation is possible by subsequent backbone twistings through stepwise proton transfer along multistep intermediate structures, which are Zundel‐like ions for PAA and Eigen‐like ions for DAA. This type of chiral transformation by multistep intramolecular proton transfers is unprecedented. Several prominent OH???O short hydrogen‐bond stretching peaks are predicted in the range of 1000–1700 cm^?1 in the Car–Parrinello molecular dynamics (CPMD) simulations, which show distinctive signatures different from ordinary hydrogen‐bond peaks. The O? H? O stretching peaks in the range of 1800–2700 cm^?1 become insignificant above around 150 K and are almost washed out at about 300 K.     

UV‐Light‐Induced Hydrogen Transfer in Guanosine–Guanosine Aggregates

Aggregates of a lipophilic guanine (G) derivative have been studied in n‐hexane by femtosecond‐to‐microsecond UV‐visible broadband transient absorption, stationary infrared and UV‐visible spectroscopy and by quantum chemical calculations. We report the first time‐resolved spectroscopic detection of hydrogen transfer in GG aggregates, which leads to (G?H) ^. radicals by means of G⁺G^? charge transfer followed by proton transfer. These radicals show a characteristic electronic spectrum in the range 300–550 nm. The calculated superimposed spectrum of the species that result from NH???N proton transfer agrees best with the experimental spectrum.     

N−H‐Type Excited‐State Proton Transfer in Compounds Possessing a Seven‐Membered‐Ring Intramolecular Hydrogen Bond

A series of compounds containing 5‐(2‐aminobenzylidene)‐2,3‐dimethyl‐3,5‐dihydro‐4H‐imidazol‐4‐one ( o ‐ABDI ) as the core chromophore with a seven‐membered‐ring N?H‐type intramolecular hydrogen bond have been synthesized and characterized. The acidity of the N?H proton and thus the hydrogen‐bond strength can be fine‐tuned by replacing one of the amino hydrogen atoms by a substituent R, the acidity increasing with increasing electron‐withdrawing strength of R, that is, in the order H<COCH₃<COPh<Tosyl<COCF₃. The tosyl and trifluoroacetyl derivatives undergo ultrafast, irreversible excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) that results in proton‐transfer emission solely in the red region. Reversible ESIPT, and hence dual emission, involving the normal and proton‐transfer tautomers was resolved for the acetyl‐ and benzyl‐substituted counterparts. For o ‐ABDI , which has the weakest acidity, ESIPT is prohibited due to its highly endergonic reaction. The results clearly demonstrate the harnessing of ESIPT by modifying the proton acidity and hydrogen‐bonding strength in a seven‐membered‐ring intramolecular hydrogen‐bonding system. For all the compounds studied, the emission quantum yields are weak (ca. 10^?3) in dichloromethane, but strong in the solid form, ranging from 3.2 to 47.4 %.     

Using (FH)2 and (FH)3 to Bridge the σ‐Hole and the Lone Pair at P in Complexes with H2XP,for X=CH3, OH,H, CCH,F, Cl,NC, and CN

Ab initio MP2/aug′‐cc‐pVTZ calculations are used to investigate the binary complexes H₂XP:HF, the ternary complexes H₂XP:(FH)₂, and the quaternary complexes H₂XP:(FH)₃, for X=CH₃, OH, H, CCH, F, Cl, NC, and CN. Hydrogen‐bonded (HB) binary complexes are formed between all H₂XP molecules and FH, but only H₂FP, H₂ClP, and H₂(NC)P form pnicogen‐bonded (ZB) complexes with FH. Ternary complexes with (FH)₂ are stabilized by F?H???P and F?H???F hydrogen bonds and F???P pnicogen bonds, except for H₂(CH₃)P:(FH)₂ and H₃P:(FH)₂, which do not have pnicogen bonds. All quaternary complexes H₂XP:(FH)₃ are stabilized by both F?H???P and F?H???F hydrogen bonds and P???F pnicogen bonds. Thus, (FH)₂ with two exceptions, and (FH)₃ can bridge the σ‐hole and the lone pair at P in these complexes. The binding energies of H₂XP:(FH)₃ complexes are significantly greater than the binding energies of H₂XP:(FH)₂ complexes, and nonadditivities are synergistic in both series. Charge transfer occurs across all intermolecular bonds from the lone‐pair donor atom to an antibonding σ* orbital of the acceptor molecule, and stabilizes these complexes. Charge‐transfer energies across the pnicogen bond correlate with the intermolecular P?F distance, while charge‐transfer energies across F?H???P and F?H???F hydrogen bonds correlate with the distance between the lone‐pair donor atom and the hydrogen‐bonded H atom. In binary and quaternary complexes, charge transfer energies also correlate with the distance between the electron‐donor atom and the hydrogen‐bonded F atom. EOM‐CCSD spin‐spin coupling constants ^2hJ(F–P) across F?H???P hydrogen bonds, and ^1pJ(P–F) across pnicogen bonds in binary, ternary, and quaternary complexes exhibit strong correlations with the corresponding intermolecular distances. Hydrogen bonds are better transmitters of F–P coupling data than pnicogen bonds, despite the longer F???P distances in F?H???P hydrogen bonds compared to P???F pnicogen bonds. There is a correlation between the two bond coupling constants ^2hJ(F–F) in the quaternary complexes and the corresponding intermolecular distances, but not in the ternary complexes, a reflection of the distorted geometries of the bridging dimers in ternary complexes.     

A Crystallographic Charge Density Study of the Partial Covalent Nature of Strong N⋅⋅⋅Br Halogen Bonds

The covalent nature of strong N?Br???N halogen bonds in a cocrystal ( 2 ) of N‐bromosuccinimide ( NBS ) with 3,5‐dimethylpyridine ( lut ) was determined from X‐ray charge density studies and compared to a weak N?Br???O halogen bond in pure crystalline NBS ( 1 ) and a covalent bond in bis(3‐methylpyridine)bromonium cation (in its perchlorate salt ( 3 ). In 2 , the donor N?Br bond is elongated by 0.0954 Å, while the Br???acceptor distance of 2.3194(4) is 1.08 Å shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii. A maximum electron density of 0.38 e Å^?3 along the Br???N halogen bond indicates a considerable covalent contribution to the total interaction. This value is intermediate to 0.067 e Å^?3 for the Br???O contact in 1 , and approximately 0.7 e Å^?3 in both N?Br bonds of the bromonium cation in 3 . A calculation of the natural bond order charges of the contact atoms, and the σ*(N1?Br) population of NBS as a function of distance between NBS and lut , have shown that charge transfer becomes significant at a Br???N distance below about 3 Å.     

Solvent‐mediated pseudo‐quadruple hydrogen‐bond motifs in three lamotrigine–carboxylic acid complexes

Lamotrigine, an antiepileptic drug, has been complexed with three aromatic carboxylic acids. All three compounds crystallize with the inclusion of N,N‐dimethylformamide (DMF) solvent, viz. lamotriginium [3,5‐diamino‐6‐(2,3‐dichlorophenyl)‐1,2,4‐triazin‐2‐ium] 4‐iodobenzoate N,N‐dimethylformamide monosolvate, C₉H₈Cl₂N₅⁺·C₇H₄IO₂⁻·C₃H₇NO, (I), lamotriginium 4‐methylbenzoate N,N‐dimethylformamide monosolvate, C₉H₇Cl₂N₅⁺·C₈H₈O₂⁻·C₃H₇NO, (II), and lamotriginium 3,5‐dinitro‐2‐hydroxybenzoate N,N‐dimethylformamide monosolvate, C₉H₈Cl₂N₅⁺·C₇H₃N₂O₇⁻·C₃H₇NO, (III). In all three structures, proton transfer takes place from the acid to the lamotrigine molecule. However, in (I) and (II), the acidic H atom is disordered over two sites and there is only partial transfer of the H atom from O to N. In (III), the corresponding H atom is ordered and complete proton transfer has occurred. Lamotrigine–lamotrigine, lamotrigine–acid and lamotrigine–solvent interactions are observed in all three structures and they thereby exhibit isostructurality. The DMF solvent extends the lamotrigine–lamotrigine dimers into a pseudo‐quadruple hydrogen‐bonding motif.     

Multiple hydrogen bonds in cytosinium zoledronate trihydrate

The asymmetric unit of the title compound [systematic name: 4‐amino‐2‐oxo‐2,3‐dihydropyrimidin‐1‐ium 1‐hydroxy‐2‐(1H,3H‐imidazol‐3‐ium‐1‐yl)ethylidenediphosphonate trihydrate], C₄H₆N₃O⁺·C₅H₉N₂O₇P₂⁻·3H₂O, contains one cytosinium cation, one zoledronate anion and three water molecules. The zoledronate anion has a zwitterionic character, in which each phosphonate group is singly deprotonated and an imidazole N atom is protonated. Furthermore, proton transfer takes place from one of the phosphonic acid groups of the zoledronate anion to one of the N atoms of the cytosinium cation. The cytosinium cation forms a C(6) chain, while the zoledronate anion forms a rectangular‐shaped centrosymmetric dimer through N—H...O hydrogen bonds. The cations and anions are held together by N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds to form a one‐dimensional polymeric tape. The three water molecules play a crucial role in hydrogen bonding, resulting in a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded network.     

A Two-coordinate Copper(I) Complex Constructed from Cyanuric acid and 4,4′-bipyridyl: Synthesis, Structure and Photoluminescence

A two-coordinate copper（Ⅰ） complex, Cu2（bipy）（H2L）2 （1） （H3L=cyanuric acid, bipy=4,4＇-bipyridyl）, which exhibits strong photoluminescence, has been synthesized under hydrothermal conditions and structurally characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction. The compound crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/n, with cell parameters： Mr= 539.42, a= 13.4806（5）A↑°, b=4.5234（2） A↑°, c= 15.4952（8）A↑°,β = 105.526（3）°, V=910.39（7）A↑°^3, Z=2 and μ=3.52 mm^ -1. In the structure the two Cu（Ⅰ） ions are bridged by bipy to form a two-coordinate copper（Ⅰ） dimer. The adjacent dimer units are connected by hydrogen bonding interactions, resulting in 1D zigzag chains along the c axis. 1 emits intense yellow light when excited with UV light.     

The 1:1 adduct of Kemp's triacid with 2‐aminopyridine

The crystal structure determination of the molecular proton‐transfer adduct of Kemp's triacid (cis‐cis‐1,3,5‐tri­methyl­cyclo­hexane‐1,3,5‐tri­carboxylic acid, KTA) with 2‐amino­pyridine (2‐APY), namely 2‐amino­pyridinium 3,5‐di­carboxy‐1,3,5‐tri­methyl­cyclo­hexane­carboxyl­ate, 2‐APY⁺·KTA^? or C₅H₇N₂⁺·C₁₂H₁₇O₆^?, has revealed a centrosymmetric hydrogen‐bonded cyclic KTA homodimer repeating unit [O?O 2.524 (4) Å] linked into a polymer structure through the pyridinium and amino groups of the 2‐APY mol­ecule [O?N 2.736 (4), 2.989 (4) and 2.999 (4) Å].     

In situ synthesis of mononuclear copper(II) complexes of the new tridentate ligand bis[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl]amine

Two mononuclear copper complexes, {bis[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl‐κN²)methyl]amine‐κN}(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐κN²)(perchlorato‐κO)copper(II) perchlorate, [Cu(ClO₄)(C₅H₈N₂)(C₁₂H₁₉N₅)]ClO₄, (I), and {bis[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl‐κN²)methyl]amine‐κN}bis(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐κN²)copper(II) bis(hexafluoridophosphate), [Cu(C₅H₈N₂)₂(C₁₂H₁₉N₅)](PF₆)₂, (II), have been synthesized by the reactions of different copper salts with the tripodal ligand tris[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl]amine (TDPA) in acetone–water solutions at room temperature. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis revealed that they contain the new tridentate ligand bis[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl]amine (BDPA), which cannot be obtained by normal organic reactions and has thus been captured in the solid state by in situ synthesis. The coordination of the Cu^II ion is distorted square pyramidal in (I) and distorted trigonal bipyramidal in (II). The new in situ generated tridentate BDPA ligand can act as a meridional or facial ligand during the process of coordination. The crystal structures of these two compounds are stabilized by classical hydrogen bonding as well as intricate nonclassical hydrogen‐bond interactions.     

Haloperoxidase‐like Compounds: Synthesis,Structure and Properties of Two New Oxidovanadium‐Poly(pyrazolyl)borate‐Carboxylate Complexes

Two new oxidovanadium (IV) complexes: TpVO(L₁) ( 1 ) and Tp*VO(pzH*)(L₂) ( 2 ) [Tp = hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate, HL₁ = 5‐methyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐3‐carboxylic acid, Tp* = hydrotris(3,5‐dimethylpyrazolyl)borate, pzH* = 3,5‐dimethylpyrazole, HL₂ = 5‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐3‐carboxylic acid] have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis and IR spectroscopy. The single‐crystal structures of the complexes shows that the vanadium ion is in a distorted octahedral environment with a N₄O₂ donor set in each complex. Additionally, hydrogen bonding interaction exits in both complexes. Interestingly, the molecules of 1 are held together to form a 1D hydrogen bonded polymer along the b axis, whereas complex 2 is a hydrogen bonded dimer. In addition, the catalytic activities of complexes 1 and 2 in bromination reactions in phosphate buffer with phenol red as a trap were evaluated primary by UV/Vis spectroscopy. Furthermore, ab initio calculations of complexes 1 and 2 were performed.     

Three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures in the hydrated proton‐transfer salts of isonipecotamide with the dicarboxylic oxalic and adipic acid homologues

The structures of the 1:1 hydrated proton‐transfer compounds of isonipecotamide (piperidine‐4‐carboxamide) with oxalic acid, 4‐carbamoylpiperidinium hydrogen oxalate dihydrate, C₆H₁₃N₂O⁺·C₂HO₄⁻·2H₂O, (I), and with adipic acid, bis(4‐carbamoylpiperidinium) adipate dihydrate, 2C₆H₁₃N₂O⁺·C₆H₈O₄²⁻·2H₂O, (II), are three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded constructs involving several different types of enlarged water‐bridged cyclic associations. In the structure of (I), the oxalate monoanions give head‐to‐tail carboxylic acid O—H...O_carboxyl hydrogen‐bonding interactions, forming C(5) chain substructures which extend along a. The isonipecotamide cations also give parallel chain substructures through amide N—H...O hydrogen bonds, the chains being linked across b and down c by alternating water bridges involving both carboxyl and amide O‐atom acceptors and amide and piperidinium N—H...O_carboxyl hydrogen bonds, generating cyclic R₄³(10) and R₃²(11) motifs. In the structure of (II), the asymmetric unit comprises a piperidinium cation, half an adipate dianion, which lies across a crystallographic inversion centre, and a solvent water molecule. In the crystal structure, the two inversion‐related cations are interlinked through the two water molecules, which act as acceptors in dual amide N—H...O_water hydrogen bonds, to give a cyclic R₄²(8) association which is conjoined with an R₄⁴(12) motif. Further N—H...O_water, water O—H...O_amide and piperidinium N—H...O_carboxyl hydrogen bonds give the overall three‐dimensional structure. The structures reported here further demonstrate the utility of the isonipecotamide cation as a synthon for the generation of stable hydrogen‐bonded structures. The presence of solvent water molecules in these structures is largely responsible for the non‐occurrence of the common hydrogen‐bonded amide–amide dimer, promoting instead various expanded cyclic hydrogen‐bonding motifs.     

Contributions of Various Noncovalent Bonds to the Interaction between an Amide and S‐Containing Molecules

N‐Methylacetamide, a model of the peptide unit in proteins, is allowed to interact with CH₃SH, CH₃SCH₃, and CH₃SSCH₃ as models of S‐containing amino acid residues. All of the minima are located on the ab initio potential energy surface of each heterodimer. Analysis of the forces holding each complex together identifies a variety of different attractive forces, including SH???O, NH???S, CH???O, CH???S, SH???π, and CH???π H‐bonds. Other contributing noncovalent bonds involve charge transfer into σ* and π* antibonds. Whereas some of the H‐bonds are strong enough that they represent the sole attractive force in several dimers, albeit not usually in the global minimum, charge‐transfer‐type noncovalent bonds play only a supporting role. The majority of dimers are bound by a collection of several of these attractive interactions. The SH???O and NH???S H‐bonds are of comparable strength, followed by CH???O and CH???S.     

Solid‐State Form Screen of Cardiosulfa and Its Analogues

Cardiosulfa is a biologically active sulfonamide molecule that was recently shown to induce abnormal heart development in zebrafish embryos through activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). The present report is a systematic study of solid‐state forms of cardiosulfa and its biologically active analogues that belong to the N‐(9‐ethyl‐9H‐carbazol‐3‐yl)benzene sulfonamide skeleton. Cardiosulfa (molecule 1 ; R¹=NO₂, R²=H, R³=CF₃), molecule 2 (H, H, CF₃), molecule 3 (CF₃, H, H), molecule 4 (NO₂, H, H), molecule 5 (H, CF₃, H), and molecule 6 (H, H, H) were synthesized and subjected to a polymorph search and solid‐state form characterization by X‐ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), variable‐temperature powder X‐ray diffraction (VT‐PXRD), FTIR, and solid‐state (ss) NMR spectroscopy. Molecule 1 was obtained in a single‐crystalline modification that is sustained by N? H???π and C? H???O interactions but devoid of strong intermolecular N? H???O hydrogen bonds. Molecule 2 displayed a N? H???O catemer C(4) chain in form I, whereas a second polymorph was characterized by PXRD. The dimorphs of molecule 3 contain N? H???π and C? H???O interactions but no N? H???O bonds. Molecule 4 is trimorphic with N? H???O catemer in form I, and N? H???π and C? H???O interactions in form II, and a third polymorph was characterized by PXRD. Both polymorphs of molecule 5 contain the N? H???O catemer C(4) chain, whereas the sulfonamide N? H???O dimer synthon R₂²(8) was observed in polymorphs of 6 . Differences in the strong and weak hydrogen‐bond motifs were correlated with the substituent groups, and the solubility and dissolution rates were correlated with the conformation in the crystal structure of 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 . Higher solubility compounds, such as 2 (10.5 mg mL^?1) and 5 (4.4 mg mL^?1), adopt a twisted confirmation, whereas less‐soluble 1 (0.9 mg mL^?1) is nearly planar. This study provides practical guides for functional‐group modification of drug lead compounds for solubility optimization.