Vaulted trans‐Bis(salicylaldiminato)platinum(II) Crystals: Heat‐Resistant,Chromatically Sensitive Platforms for Solid‐State Phosphorescence at Ambient Temperature

The synthesis, structure, and solid‐state emission of vaulted trans‐bis(salicylaldiminato)platinum(II) complexes are described. A series of polymethylene ( 1 : n=8; 2 : n=9; 3 : n=10; 4 : n=11; 5 : n=12; 6 : n=13) and polyoxyethylene ( 7 : m=2; 8 : m=3; 9 : m=4) vaulted complexes (R=H ( a ), 3‐MeO ( b ), 4‐MeO ( c ), 5‐MeO ( d ), 6‐MeO ( e ), 4‐CF₃O ( f ), 5‐CF₃O ( g )) was prepared by treating [PtCl₂(CH₃CN)₂] with the corresponding N,N′‐bis(salicylidene)‐1,ω‐alkanediamines. The trans coordination, vaulted structures, and the crystal packing of 1 – 9 have been unequivocally established from X‐ray diffraction studies. Unpredictable, structure‐dependent phosphorescent emission has been observed for crystals of the complexes under UV excitation at ambient temperature, whereas these complexes are entirely nonemissive in the solution state under the same conditions. The long‐linked complex crystals 4 – 6 , 8 , and 9 exhibit intense emission (Φ_77K=0.22–0.88) at 77 K, whereas short‐linked complexes 1 – 3 and 7 are non‐ or slightly emissive at the same temperature (Φ_77K<0.01–0.18). At 298 K, some of the long‐linked crystals, 4 a , 4 b , 5 c , 5 e , 6 c , 6 e , and 9 b , completely lose their high‐emission properties with elevation of the temperature (Φ_298K<0.01–0.02), whereas the other long‐linked crystals, 5 a , 6 a , 9 a , and 9 d , exhibit high heat resistance towards emission decay with increasing temperature (Φ_298K=0.21–0.38). Chromogenic control of solid‐state emission over the range of 98 nm can be performed simply by introducing MeO groups at different positions on the aromatic rings. Orange, yellow‐green, red, and yellow emissions are observed in the glass and crystalline state upon 3‐, 4‐, 5‐, and 6‐MeO substitution, respectively, whereas those with CF₃O substituents have orange emission, irrespective of the substitution position. DFT calculations (B3LYP/6‐31G*, LanL2DZ) showed that such chromatic variation is ascribed to the position‐specific influence of the substituents on the highest‐occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest‐unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) levels of the trans‐bis(salicylaldiminato)platinum(II) platform. The solid‐state emission and its heat resistance have been discussed on the basis of X‐ray diffraction studies. The planarity of the trans‐coordination sites is strongly correlated to the solid‐state emission intensities of crystals 1 – 9 at lower temperatures. The specific heat‐resistance properties shown exclusively by the 5 a , 6 a , 9 a , and 9 d crystals are due to their strong three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding interactions and/or Pt???Pt contacts, whereas heat‐quenchable crystals 4 a , 4 b , 5 c , 5 e , 6 c , 6 e , and 9 b are poorly bound with limited interactions, such as non‐, one‐, or two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding networks. These results lead to the conclusion that Pt???Pt contacts are an important factor in the heat resistance of solid‐state phosphorescence at ambient temperature, although the role of Pt???Pt contacts can be substituted by only higher‐ordered hydrogen‐bonding fixation.     

Binuclear trans‐Bis(β‐iminoaryloxy)palladium(II) Complexes Doubly Linked with Pentamethylene Spacers: Structure‐Dependent Flapping Motion and Heterochiral Association Behavior of the Clothespin‐Shaped Molecules

The synthesis, structure, and solution‐state behavior of clothespin‐shaped binuclear trans‐bis(β‐iminoaryloxy)palladium(II) complexes doubly linked with pentamethylene spacers are described. Achiral syn and racemic anti isomers of complexes 1 – 3 were prepared by treating Pd(OAc)₂ with the corresponding N,N′‐bis(β‐hydroxyarylmethylene)‐1,5‐pentanediamine and then subjecting the mixture to chromatographic separation. Optically pure (100 % ee) complexes, (+)‐anti‐ 1 , (+)‐anti‐ 2 , and (+)‐anti‐ 3 , were obtained from the racemic mixture by employing a preparative HPLC system with a chiral column. The trans coordination and clothespin‐shaped structures with syn and anti conformations of these complexes have been unequivocally established by X‐ray diffraction studies. ¹H NMR analysis showed that (±)‐anti‐ 1 , (±)‐anti‐ 2 , syn‐ 2 , and (±)‐anti‐ 3 display a flapping motion by consecutive stacking association/dissociation between cofacial coordination planes in [D₈]toluene, whereas syn‐ 1 and syn‐ 3 are static under the same conditions. The activation parameters for the flapping motion (ΔH^≠ and ΔS^≠) were determined from variable‐temperature NMR analyses as 50.4 kJ mol^?1 and 60.1 J mol^?1 K^?1 for (±)‐anti‐ 1 , 31.0 kJ mol^?1 and ?22.7 J mol^?1 K^?1 for (±)‐anti‐ 2 , 29.6 kJ mol^?1 and ?57.7 J mol^?1 K^?1 for syn‐ 2 , and 35.0 kJ mol^?1 and 0.5 J mol^?1 K^?1 for (±)‐anti‐ 3 , respectively. The molecular structure and kinetic parameters demonstrate that all of the anti complexes flap with a twisting motion in [D₈]toluene, although (±)‐anti‐ 1 bearing dilated Z‐shaped blades moves more dynamically than I‐shaped (±)‐anti‐ 2 or the smaller (±)‐anti‐ 3 . Highly symmetrical syn‐ 2 displays a much more static flapping motion, that is, in a see‐saw‐like manner. In CDCl₃, (±)‐anti‐ 1 exhibits an extraordinary upfield shift of the ¹H NMR signals with increasing concentration, whereas solutions of (+)‐anti‐ 1 and the other syn/anti analogues 2 and 3 exhibit negligible or slight changes in the chemical shifts under the same conditions, which indicates that anti‐ 1 undergoes a specific heterochiral association in the solution state. Equilibrium constants for the dimerizations of (±)‐ and (+)‐anti‐ 1 in CDCl₃ at 293 K were estimated by curve‐fitting analysis of the ¹H NMR chemical shift dependences on concentration as 26 M ^?1 [K_D(racemic)] and 3.2 M ^?1 [K_D(homo)], respectively. The heterochiral association constant [K_D(hetero)] was estimated as 98 M ^?1, based on the relationship K_D(racemic)=1/2 K_D(homo)+1/4 K_D(hetero). An inward stacking motif of interpenetrative dimer association is postulated as the mechanistic rationale for this rare case of heterochiral association.     

Supramolecular Polymers Self‐Assembled from trans‐Bis(pyridine) Dichloropalladium(II) and Platinum(II) Complexes

Two structurally similar trans‐bis(pyridine) dichloropalladium(II)‐ and platinum(II)‐type complexes were synthesized and characterized. They both self‐assemble in n‐hexane to form viscous fluids at lower concentrations, but form metallogels at sufficient concentrations. The viscous solutions were studied by capillary viscosity measurements and UV/Vis absorption spectra monitored during the disassembly process indicated that a metallophilic interaction was involved in the supramolecular polymerization process. For the two supramolecular assemblies, uncommon continuous porous networks were observed by using SEM and TEM revealed that they were built from nanofibers that fused and crosslinked with the increase of concentration. The xerogels of the palladium and platinum complexes were carefully studied by using synchrotron radiation WAXD and EXAFS. The WAXD data show close stacking distances driven by π–π and metal–metal interactions and an evident dimer structure for the platinum complex was found. The coordination bond lengths were extracted from fitting of the EXAFS data. Moreover, close Pt^II–Pt^II (Pd^II–Pd^II) and Pt?Cl (Pd?Cl) interactions proposed from DFT calculations in the reported oligo(phenylene ethynylene) (OPE)‐based palladium(II) pyridyl supramolecular polymers were also confirmed by using EXAFS. The Pt^II–Pt^II interaction is more feasible for supramolecular interaction than the Pd^II–Pd^II interaction in our simple case.     

Engineering Stacks of V‐Shaped Polyaromatic Compounds with Alkyl Chains for Enhanced Emission in the Solid State

A V‐shaped bisanthracene derivative with three butyl groups formed two types of emissive solids that display bluish green and blue fluorescence (Φ_F=72 and 32 %, respectively), depending on the preparation conditions. The crystal and powder X‐ray analyses reveal that the highly emissive solid adopts a head‐to‐head arrangement with discrete stacks of the anthracene moieties, whereas the moderately emissive solid adopts a head‐to‐tail arrangement without the stacks. The obtained molecular arrangements are transformed by thermal stimuli accompanying the change in fluorescence. Furthermore, large enhancements of dye emissions (12–45‐fold) through highly efficient host–guest energy transfer were achieved in the solid state by adding minute amounts of various fluorescent dyes (e.g. rubrene and Nile red) to the V‐shaped compound.     

Complexes of nickel(II) and copper(II) with 1,2,4‐triazole‐3‐carboxylic acid and of cobalt(III) with 3‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazole‐5‐carboxylic acid

Because of their versatile coordination modes and strong coordination ability for metals, triazole ligands can provide a wide range of possibilities for the construction of metal–organic frameworks. Three transition‐metal complexes, namely bis(μ‐1,2,4‐triazol‐4‐ide‐3‐carboxylato)‐κ³N ²,O :N ¹;κ³N ¹:N ²,O‐bis[triamminenickel(II)] tetrahydrate, [Ni₂(C₃HN₃O₂)₂(NH₃)₆]·4H₂O, (I), catena‐poly[[[diamminediaquacopper(II)]‐μ‐1,2,4‐triazol‐4‐ide‐3‐carboxylato‐κ³N ¹:N ⁴,O‐[diamminecopper(II)]‐μ‐1,2,4‐triazol‐4‐ide‐3‐carboxylato‐κ³N ⁴,O :N ¹] dihydrate], {[Cu₂(C₃HN₃O₂)₂(NH₃)₄(H₂O)₂]·2H₂O}_n , (II), (μ‐5‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐ide‐3‐carboxylato‐κ²N ¹:N ²)di‐μ‐hydroxido‐κ⁴O :O‐bis[triamminecobalt(III)] nitrate hydroxide trihydrate, [Co₂(C₃H₂N₄O₂)(OH)₂(NH₃)₆](NO₃)(OH)·3H₂O, (III), with different structural forms have been prepared by the reaction of transition metal salts, i.e. NiCl₂, CuCl₂ and Co(NO₃)₂, with 1,2,4‐triazole‐3‐carboxylic acid or 3‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazole‐5‐carboxylic acid hemihydrate in aqueous ammonia at room temperature. Compound (I) is a dinuclear complex. Extensive O—H…O, O—H…N and N—H…O hydrogen bonds and π–π stacking interactions between the centroids of the triazole rings contribute to the formation of the three‐dimensional supramolecular structure. Compound (II) exhibits a one‐dimensional chain structure, with O—H…O hydrogen bonds and weak O—H…N, N—H…O and C—H…O hydrogen bonds linking anions and lattice water molecules into the three‐dimensional supramolecular structure. Compared with compound (I), compound (III) is a structurally different dinuclear complex. Extensive N—H…O, N—H…N, O—H…N and O—H…O hydrogen bonding occurs in the structure, leading to the formation of the three‐dimensional supramolecular structure.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of the Tris‐bidentate Carbonatobis‐(1,10‐phenanthroline‐N,N′)nickel(II), [Ni(C12H8N2)2(CO3)]

The tris‐bidentate complex [Ni(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂(CO₃)] was synthesized by the reaction of Na₂CO₃, 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen = C₁₂H₈N₂) and NiSO₄ · 6 H₂O in the presence of succinic acid in a CH₃OH–H₂O solution. The compound crystallizes as heptahydrate. The crystal structure (monoclinic, P2₁/c (no. 14), a = 9.897(1), b = 26.384(2), c = 10.582(1) Å, β = 105.87(1)°, Z = 4, R = 0.0505, wR² = 0.1029 for 3166 observed reflections (F ≥ 2σ(F ) out of 6100 unique reflections) consists of hydrogen bonded water molecules and [Ni(phen)₂(CO₃)] complex molecules. The Ni atoms are sixfold octahedrally coordinated by the four N atoms of two bidentate chelating phen ligands and by two O atoms of the bidentate chelating carbonate group with d(Ni–N) = 2.092–2.100 Å, d(Ni–O) = 2.051, 2.079 Å. The complex molecules are stacked into 2D corrugated layers parallel to (010) via two types of intermolecular π‐π stacking interactions. One occurs between two quinoline rings of neighboring phen ligands at the distance of 3.63 Å in [010] direction and the other results from 1D π‐π stacking interactions through partially covered phen rings at alternative distances of 3.26 Å and 3.33 Å in [001] direction. The water molecules are sandwiched between 2D layers.     

CO2‐Induced Spin‐State Switching at Room Temperature in a Monomeric Cobalt(II) Complex with the Porous Nature

CO₂‐responsive spin‐state conversion between high‐spin (HS) and low‐spin (LS) states at room temperature was achieved in a monomeric cobalt(II) complex. A neutral cobalt(II) complex, [Co^II(COO‐terpy)₂]?4 H₂O ( 1?4 H₂O ), stably formed cavities generated via π–π stacking motifs and hydrogen bond networks, resulting in the accommodation of four water molecules. Crystalline 1?4 H₂O transformed to solvent‐free 1 without loss of porosity by heating to 420 K. Compound 1 exhibited a selective CO₂ adsorption via a gate‐open type of the structural modification. Furthermore, the HS/LS transition temperature (T_1/2) was able to be tuned by the CO₂ pressure over a wide temperature range. Unlike 1 exhibits the HS state at 290 K, the CO₂‐accomodated form 1?CO₂ (P =110 kPa) was stabilized in the LS state at 290 K, probably caused by a chemical pressure effect by CO₂ accommodation, which provides reversible spin‐state conversion by introducing/evacuating CO₂ gas into/from 1 .     

Three zinc(II) and cadmium(II) complexes containing 4‐amino‐3,5‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole and polynitrile ligands: synthesis,molecular and supramolecular structures,and photoluminescence properties

Three photoluminescent complexes containing either Zn^II or Cd^II have been synthesized and their structures determined. Bis[4‐amino‐3,5‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole‐κ²N ¹,N ⁵]bis(dicyanamido‐κN ¹)zinc(II), [Zn(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)₂(C₂N₃)₂], (I), bis[4‐amino‐3,5‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole‐κ²N ¹,N ⁵]bis(dicyanamido‐κN ¹)cadmium(II), [Cd(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)₂(C₂N₃)₂], (II), and bis[4‐amino‐3,5‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole‐κ²N ¹,N ⁵]bis(tricyanomethanido‐κN ¹)cadmium(II), [Cd(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)₂(C₄N₃)₂], (III), all crystallize in the space group P , with the metal centres lying on centres of inversion, but neither analogues (I) and (II) nor Cd^II complexes (II) and (III) are isomorphous. A combination of N—H…N and C—H…N hydrogen bonds and π–π stacking interactions generates three‐dimensional framework structures in (I) and (II), and a sheet structure in (III). The photoluminescence spectra of (I)–(III) indicate that the energies of the π–π* transitions in the coordinated triazole ligand are modified by minor changes of the ligand geometry associated with coordination to the metal centres.     

Crystallographic report: Bis[tris(2‐pyridyl)amine]cadmium(II)‐di‐µ‐chloro‐dichloro‐cadmium(II), [(C5H4N)3N]2CdCl2CdCl2

In the dinuclear molecule of [(C₅H₄N)₃N]₂CdCl₂CdCl₂, one cadmium is octahedrally coordinated by a Cl₂N₄ donor set and the other cadmium is tetrahedrally coordinated by four chlorine atoms. The dinuclear units are connected by π–π interactions to give a two‐dimensional network. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Molecular and Crystal Structure of an Organoplatinum(II) Complex with Dipyrido[3,2-a : 2′,3′-c]phenazine (dppz)

The dimesitylplatinum(II) complex PtMes₂(dppz) (Mes = mesityl = 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl) crystallizes with one equivalent of toluene (C₄₃H₄₀N₄Pt, monoclinic, P2₁/c, Z = 4, a = 14.3551(14) Å, b = 15.8319(14) Å, c = 15.369(2) Å, β = 96.784(6)°). The (dppz)Pt(C1_Mes)₂ part of the molecule was found to be planar, the mesityl substituents adopting dihedral angles of 70.3° and 85.5° with that plane. The photoemissive and reversibly reducible and oxidizable complex molecules form pairs in the crystal with the planar phenazine π “tails” overlapping in graphite-like fashion at 3.427 Å distance. The results are discussed in comparision with a recently reported structure of PtCl₂(dppz).     

Synthesis,crystal structures and luminescence properties of seven mononuclear zinc(II), cadmium(II), cobalt(II) and nickel(II) complexes with 5‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazole

Due to their versatile coordination modes and metal‐binding conformations, triazolyl ligands can provide a wide range of possibilities for the construction of supramolecular structures. Seven mononuclear transition metal complexes with different structural forms, namely aquabis[3‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazolato‐κ²N ¹,N ⁵]zinc(II), [Zn(C₁₄H₁₁N₄)₂(H₂O)], (I), bis[5‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazole‐κ²N ³,N ⁴]bis(nitrato‐κO )zinc(II), [Zn(NO₃)₂(C₁₄H₁₂N₄)₂], (II), bis(methanol‐κO )bis[3‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazolato‐κ²N ¹,N ⁵]zinc(II), [Zn(C₁₄H₁₁N₄)₂(CH₄O)₂], (III), diiodidobis[5‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazole‐κ²N ³,N ⁴]cadmium(II), [CdI₂(C₁₄H₁₂N₄)₂], (IV), bis[5‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazole‐κ²N ³,N ⁴]bis(nitrato‐κO )cadmium(II), [Cd(NO₃)₂(C₁₄H₁₂N₄)₂], (V), aquabis[3‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazolato‐κ²N ¹,N ⁵]cobalt(II), [Co(C₁₄H₁₁N₄)₂(H₂O)], (VI), and diaquabis[3‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazolato‐κ²N ¹,N ⁵]nickel(II), [Ni(C₁₄H₁₁N₄)₂(H₂O)₂], (VII), have been prepared by the reaction of transition metal salts (Zn^II, Cd^II, Co^II and Ni^II) with 3‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazole (pymphtzH) under either ambient or hydrothermal conditions. These compounds have been characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. All the complexes form three‐dimensional supramolecular structures through hydrogen bonds or through π–π stacking interactions between the centroids of the pyridyl or arene rings. The pymphtzH and pymphtz⁻ entities act as bidentate coordinating ligands in each structure. Moreover, all the pyridyl N atoms are coordinated to metal atoms (Zn, Cd, Co or Ni). The N atom in the 4‐position of the triazole group is coordinated to the Zn and Cd atoms in the crystal structures of (II), (IV) and (V), while the N atom in the 1‐position of the triazolate group is coordinated to the Zn, Co and Ni atoms in (I), (III), (VI) and (VII).     

Pentafluorobenzoato‐dimolybdenum(II) Solvate and Co‐crystal Complexes with Benzene and Naphthalin

The quadruply bonded Mo₂⁴⁺ complex Mo₂(DAniF)₃(OOCC₆F₅) ( 1 ) [DAniF = N,N′‐bis(4‐methoxyphenyl)formamidinate] was synthesized. The solvate Mo₂(DAniF)₃(OOCC₆F₅) · (C₆H₆) ( 2 ) and co‐crystal Mo₂(DAniF)₃(OOCC₆F₅) · (C₁₀H₈) ( 3 ) complexes were obtained by self‐assembly of crystals of 1 with benzene and naphthalin, respectively. Compounds 1 , 2 , and 3 were structurally characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In monomer 1 , the Mo–Mo bond length of 2.0874(6) Å is typical for dimolybdenum quadruple bonds. The solvate complex 2 was stabilized by weak π–π stacking interactions between the benzene molecule and the pentafluorophenyl ring (as indicated by a center‐to‐center distance of 3.838(10) Å and a center‐to‐plane distance of 3.712(4) Å between phenyl and pentafluorophenyl ring) and intermolecular C–H ··· F–C interactions (the shortest F ··· H distance is 2.560(2) Å). In complex 3 , a one‐dimensional chain was formed by C–H ··· F–C interactions between the hydrogen atoms in naphthalin and the fluorine atoms in the monomer (H ··· F distances of 2.582(2) Å). Information on the structures in solution of the three crystals was obtained by ¹H NMR spectroscopy.     

Assembly of Three 2D Metal‐Organic Frameworks (MOFs) Derived from Flexible Ligands, 1,4‐bis(3‐pyridyl)‐2,3‐diaza‐1,3‐butadiene (3‐bpd) and/or 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethane (dpe)

Three coordination polymers, {[Cd(3‐bpd)₂(NCS)₂]×C₂H₅OH}_n ( 1 ), {[Cd(3‐bpd)(dpe)(NO₃)₂]×(3‐bpd)}₂ ( 2 ), {[Cd(dpe)₂(NCS)₂]×3‐bpd×2H₂O}_n ( 3 ) (3‐bpd = 1,4‐bis(3‐pyridyl)‐2,3‐diaza‐1,3‐butadiene; dpe = 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethane), were prepared and structurally characterized by a single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction method. In compound 1 , each Cd(II) ion is six‐coordinate bonded to six nitrogen atoms from four 3‐bpd and two NCS^? ligands. The 3‐bpd acts as a bridging ligand connecting the Cd(II) ion to generate a 2D layered metal‐organic framework (MOF) by using a rhomboidal‐grid as the basic building units with the 4⁴ topology. In compound 2 , the Cd(II) ion is also six‐coordinate bonded to four nitrogen atoms of two 3‐bpd, two dpe and two oxygen atoms of two NO₃^? ligands. The 3‐bpd and dpe ligands both adopt bis‐monodentate coordination mode connecting the Cd(II) ions to generate a 2D layered MOF by using a rectangle‐grid as the basic building units with the 4⁴ topology. In compound 3 , two crystallographically independent Cd(II) ions are both coordinated by four nitrogen atoms of dpe ligands in the basal plane and two nitrogen atom of NCS^? in the axial sites. The dpe acts as a bridging ligand to connect the Cd(II) ions forming a 2D interpenetrating MOFs by using a square‐grid as the basic unit with the 4⁴ topology. All of their 2D layered MOFs in compounds 1 ‐ 3 are then arranged in a parallel non‐interpenetrating ABAB—packing manner in 1 and 2 , and mutually interpenetrating manner in 3 , respectively, to extend their 3D supramolecular architectures with their 1D pores intercalated with solvent (ethanol in 1 or H₂O in 3 ) or free 3‐bpd molecules in 2 and 3 , respectively. The photoluminescence measurements of 1 ‐ 3 reveal that the emission is tentatively assigned to originate from π‐π* transition for 1 and 2 and probably due to ligand‐center luminescence for compounds 3 , respectively.     

An Azelaato‐bridged Dinuclear Copper(II) Complex, [Cu2(phen)2(C9H14O4)2] · 6 H2O (phen = 1,10‐phenanthroline)

The title compound [Cu₂(phen)₂(C₉H₁₄O₄)₂] · 6 H₂O was prepared by the reaction of CuCl₂ · 2 H₂O, 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen), azelaic acid and Na₂CO₃ in a CH₃OH/H₂O solution. The crystal structure (monoclinic, C2/c (no. 15), a = 22.346(3), b = 11.862(1), c = 17.989(3) Å, β = 91.71(1)°, Z = 4, R = 0.0473, wR² = 0.1344 for 4279 observed reflections) consists of centrosymmetric dinuclear [Cu₂(phen)₂(C₉H₁₄O₄)₂] complexes and hydrogen bonded H₂O molecules. The Cu atom is square‐planar coordinated by the two N atoms of the chelating phen ligand and two O atoms of different bidentate bridging azelaate groups with d(Cu–N) = 2.053, 2.122(2) Å and d(Cu–O) = 1.948(2), 2.031(2) Å. Two azelaate anions bridge two common Cu atoms via the terminal O atoms (d(C–O) = 1.29(2) Å; d(C–C) = 1.550(4)–1.583(4) Å). Phen ligands of adjacent complexes cover each other at distances of about 3.62 Å, indicating π‐π stacking interaction, by which the complexes are linked to 1 D bands.     

σ–π Continuum in Indole–Palladium(II) Complexes

The intrinsic features of (hetero‐arene)–metal interactions have been elusive mainly because the systematic structure analysis of non‐anchored hetero‐arene–metal complexes has been hampered by their labile nature. We report successful isolation and systematic structure analysis of a series of non‐anchored indole–palladium(II) complexes. It was revealed that there is a σ–π continuum for the indole–metal interaction, while it has been thought that the dominant coordination mode of indole to a metal center is the Wheland‐intermediate‐type σ‐mode in light of the seemingly strong electron‐donating ability of indole. Several factors which affect the σ‐ or π‐character of indole–metal interactions are discussed.     

Syntheses,Structures and Luminescent Properties of Metal Halide Complexes Containing 2,3‐Diphenylquinoxaline

The reaction of CuI with 2,3‐diphenylquinoxaline ( L ) in 1:1 mole proportion in CH₃CN/THF afforded the dinuclear complex [CuI( L )]₂, 1 , whereas the reactions of MX₂ (M = Cu; Hg) with L in 1:2 mole proportion in CH₃OH gave the mononuclear complexes CuX₂( L )₂ (X = Cl, 2 ; Br, 3 ) and HgX₂( L )₂ (X = Cl, 4 ; Br, 5 ). Formulations of all the complexes were determined on the basis of X‐ray crystallography, elemental, IR‐ and emission spectroscopy. X‐ray examination revealed that complex 1 forms the μ,μ‐iodobridged dimer with distorted trigonal planar geometry through coordination of L ligand by one nitrogen atom to the Cu(I) center. The metal centers of complexes 2 and 3 form distorted square planar geometry while those of complexes 4 and 5 form linear geometry. The molecules of these complexes are interlinked through C‐H—π and/or π‐π stacking and anion—π interactions that form the packed structure. All the complexes exhibit emissions which may be tentatively assigned as intraligand (IL) π r? π* transitions.     

A New Polymer of Mixed‐Anions Complex [Pb(phen)(O2CCH3)(O2NO)]n (phen = 1,10‐phenanthroline)

The single crystal X‐ray data of a mixed anions complex of Pb^II with 1,10‐Phenantroline, [Pb(phen)(O₂CCH₃)‐ (O₂NO)], shows the complex to be polymeric as a result of acetate ligand bridging. The Pb atom has an asymmetrical eightfold coordination of two nitrogen atoms of the 1,10‐phenanthroline ligand and six oxygen atoms of the nitrate and acetate anions. The arrangement of the 1,10‐phenantroline ligand, acetate and nitrate anions suggest a gap in the coordination around the Pb^II ion, occupied possibly by a stereoactive lone pair of electrons on lead(II) where the coordination around the lead atoms is hemidirected. There is a π‐π stacking interaction between the parallel aromatic rings of an adjacent chain in the compound which might help to increase the ‘gap' in the coordination around the Pb^II ion.     

Solid‐State Structures and Solution Analyses of a Phenylpropylpyridine N‐Oxide and an N‐Methyl Phenylpropylpyridine

The crystal structures of phenylpropylpyridine‐N‐oxide and N‐methyl‐phenylpropylpyridinium iodide are compared, revealing that hydrogen bonding with the solvent molecule plays an important role in the N‐oxide compound, whilst electrostatic interactions are predominant in controlling the solid‐state orientation of the N‐methylated compound. Fluorescence spectroscopy and NOESY indicate that in contrast to the previously reported pyridinium iodide, the N‐oxide is not subject to intramolecular π‐stacking, as judged by excimer emission and a lack of corresponding cross peaks, respectively.     

Structural and Solution Studies of two Mercury(II) Complexes with [1,3‐Bis(2‐ethoxy)benzene]triazene

The reaction of [1,3‐bis(2‐ethoxy)benzene]triazene, [ HL ], with Hg(SCN)₂ and Hg(CH₃COO)₂, resulted in the formation of the complexes [Hg L (SCN)] ( 1 ) and [Hg L ₂] · CH₃OH ( 2 ). They were characterized by means of X‐ray crystallography, CHN analysis, FT‐IR, ¹H NMR, and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The structure of compound 1 consists of two independent complexes in which the Hg^II atoms are stacked along the crystallographic a axis to form infinite chains. Each Hg^II atom is chelated by one L ligand and one SCN ligand, whereas in compound 2 , the Hg^II atom is surrounded by two L ligands. In addition, 1D chains formed by metal–π interactions are connected to each other by C–H ··· π stacking interactions in the structure of 1 , which results in a 2D architecture. An interesting feature of compound 2 is the presence of C–H ··· π edge‐to‐face interactions.