Synthesis and Asymmetric Enantioselective Addition of Chiral Polybinaphthyl and Polybinaphthol I.igands

Four chiral polymers P-1, P-2, P-3 and P-4 were synthesized by the polymerization of （S）-2,2＇-dioctoxy-1,1＇- binaphthyl-6,6＇-boronic acid （S-M-3） with （S）-6,6＇-dibromo-1,1＇-binaphthol （S-M-1）, （R）-6,6＇-dibromo-1,1＇- binaphthol （R-M-1）, （S）-3,3＇-diiodo-1,1＇-binaphthol （S-M-2） and （R）-3,3＇-diiodo-1,1＇-binaphthol （R-M-2） under Pd-catalyzed Suzuki reaction, respectively. All four polymers can show good solubility in some common solvents due to the nonplanarity of the polymers in the main chain backbone and flexible alkyl groups in the side chain. The analysis results indicate that specific rotation and circular dichroism （CD） spectral signals of the alternative S-S chiral polymers P-1 and P-3 are larger than those of S-R chiral polymers P-2 and P-4, but their UV-Vis and fluorescence spectra are almost similar. The results of asymmetric enantioselectivity of four polymers for diethylzinc addition to benzaldehyde indicate that catalytically active center is （R） or （S）-1, 1＇-binaphthol moieties.     

Non‐iterative Asymmetric Synthesis of C15 Polyketide Spiroketals

The 2,2′‐methylenebis[furan] ( 1 ) was converted to 1‐{(4R,6S))‐6‐[(2R)‐2,4‐dihydroxybutyl]‐2,2‐dimethyl‐1,3‐dioxan‐4‐yl}‐3‐[(2R,4R)‐tetrahydro‐4,6‐dihydroxy‐2H‐pyran‐2‐yl)propan‐2‐one ((+)‐ 18 ) and its (4S)‐epimer (?)‐ 19 with high stereo‐ and enantioselectivity (Schemes 1–3). Under acidic methanolysis, (+)‐ 18 yielded a single spiroketal, (3R)‐4‐{(1R,3S,4′R,5R,6′S,7R)‐3′,4′,5′,6′‐tetrahydro‐4′‐hydroxy‐7‐methoxyspiro[2,6‐dioxabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane‐3,2′‐[2H]pyran]‐6′‐yl}butane‐1,3‐diol ((?)‐ 20 ), in which both O‐atoms at the spiro center reside in equatorial positions, this being due to the tricyclic nature of (?)‐ 20 (methyl pyranoside formation). Compound (?)‐ 19 was converted similarly into the (4′S)‐epimeric tricyclic spiroketal (?)‐ 21 that also adopts a similar (3S)‐configuration and conformation. Spiroketals (?)‐ 20 , (?)‐ 21 and analog (?)‐ 23 , i.e., (1R,3S,4′R,5R,6′R)‐3′,4′,5′,6′‐tetrahydro‐6′‐[(2S)‐2‐hydroxybut‐3‐enyl]‐7‐methoxyspiro[2,6‐dioxabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane‐3,2′‐[2H]pyran]‐4′‐ol, derived from (?)‐ 20 , were assayed for their cytotoxicity toward murine P388 lymphocytic leukemia and six human cancer cell lines. Only racemic (±)‐ 21 showed evidence of cancer‐cell‐growth inhibition (P388, ED₅₀: 6.9 μg/ml).     

Chloro(η6‐p‐cymene)(phosphoramidite)ruthenium(II), a 16‐Electron Fragment Stabilized by an η2‐Aryl–Metal Interaction,and Its Use in Asymmetric Cyclopropanation

Chloride abstraction from the half‐sandwich complexes [RuCl₂(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(P*‐κP)] ( 2a : P* = (S_a,R,R)‐ 1a = (1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl bis[(1R)‐1‐phenylethyl)]phosphoramidite; 2b : P* = (S_a,R,R)‐ 1b = (1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl bis[(1R)‐(1‐(1‐naphthalen‐1‐yl)ethyl]phosphoramidite) with (Et₃O)[PF₆] or Tl[PF₆] gives the cationic, 18‐electron complexes dichloro(η⁶‐p‐cymene){(1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl {(1R)‐1‐[(1,2‐η)‐phenyl]ethyl}[(1R)‐1‐phenylethyl]phosphoramidite‐κP}ruthenium(II) hexafluorophosphate ( 3a ) and [Ru(S)]‐dichloro(η⁶‐p‐cymene){(1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl {(1R)‐1‐[(1,2‐η)‐naphthalen‐1‐yl]ethyl}[(1R)‐1‐(naphthalen‐1‐yl)ethyl]phosphoramidite‐κP)ruthenium(II) hexafluorophosphate ( 3b ), which feature the η²‐coordination of one aryl substituent of the phosphoramidite ligand, as indicated by ¹H‐, ¹³C‐, and ³¹P‐NMR spectroscopy and confirmed by an X‐ray study of 3b . Additionally, the dissociation of p‐cymene from 2a and 3a gives dichloro{(1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl [(1R)‐(1‐(η⁶‐phenyl)ethyl][(1R)‐1‐phenylethyl]phosphoramidite‐κP)ruthenium(II) ( 4a ) and di‐μ‐chlorobis{(1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl [(1R)‐1‐(η⁶‐phenyl)ethyl][(1R)‐1‐phenylethyl]phosphoramidite‐κP}diruthenium(II) bis(hexafluorophosphate) ( 5a ), respectively, in which one phenyl group of the N‐substituents is η⁶‐coordinated to the Ru‐center. Complexes 3a and 3b catalyze the asymmetric cyclopropanation of α‐methylstyrene with ethyl diazoacetate with up to 86 and 87% ee for the cis‐ and the trans‐isomers, respectively.     

Reduction of Capsorubin and Cryptocapsin

(6′S)‐ and (6′R)‐‘Capsorubol‐6‐one' (=(3S,3′S,5R,5′R,6′S)‐ and (3S,3′S,5R,5′R,6′R)‐3,3′,6′‐trihydroxy‐κ,κ‐caroten‐6‐one; 8 and 9 , resp.), (6S,6′R)‐ and (6R,6′R)‐capsorubol (=3S,3′S,5R,5′R,6S,6′R)‐ and (3S,3′S,5R,5′R,6R,6′R)‐κ,κ‐carotene‐3,3′,6,6′‐tetrol; 11 and 12 , resp.) and (6′S)‐ and (6′R)‐cryptocapsol (=(3′S,5′R,6′S)‐ and (3′S,5′R,6′R)‐β,κ‐carotene‐3′,6′‐diol; 5 and 6 , resp.) were prepared in crystalline from by the reduction of capsorubin (=(3S,3′S,5R,5′R)‐3,3′‐dihydroxy‐κ,κ‐carotene‐6,6′‐dione; 7 ) and cryptocapsin (=(3′S,5′R)‐3′‐hydroxy‐β,κ‐caroten‐6′‐one; 4 ) and characterized by their UV/VIS, CD, ¹H‐NMR, and mass spectra.     

Determination of Absolute Configuration of Decipinone,a Diterpenoid Ester with a Myrsinane‐Type Carbon Skeleton,by NMR Spectroscopy

The absolute configuration of decipinone ( 2 ), a myrsinane‐type diterpene ester previously isolated from Euphorbia decipiens, has been determined by NMR study of its axially chiral derivatives (aR)‐ and (aS)‐N‐hydroxy‐2′‐methoxy‐1,1′‐binaphthalene‐2‐carboximidoyl chloride ((aR)‐MBCC ( 3a ) and (aS)‐MBCC ( 3b )). The absolute configurations at C(7) and C(13) of 2 determined were (R) and (S), respectively. Therefore, considering the relative configuration of 2 , the absolute configuration determined was (2S,3S,4R,5R,6R,7R,11S,12R,13S,15R).     

1,3‐Oxathiolanes from the Reaction of Aromatic and Enolized Thioketones with Monosubstituted Oxiranes

The reactions of 4,4′‐dimethoxythiobenzophenone ( 1 ) with (S)‐2‐methyloxirane ((S)‐ 2 ) and (R)‐2‐phenyloxirane ((R)‐ 6 ) in the presence of a Lewis acid such as BF₃?Et₂O, ZnCl₂, or SiO₂ in dry CH₂Cl₂ led to the corresponding 1 : 1 adducts, i.e., 1,3‐oxathiolanes (S)‐ 3 with Me at C(5), and (S)‐ 7 and (R)‐ 8 with Ph at C(4) and C(5), respectively. A 1 : 2 adduct, 1,3,6‐dioxathiocane (4S,8S)‐ 4 and 1,3‐dioxolane (S)‐ 9 , respectively, were formed as minor products (Schemes 3 and 5, Tables 1 and 2). Treatment of the 1 : 1 adduct (S)‐ 3 with (S)‐ 2 and BF₃?Et₂O gave the 1 : 2 adduct (4S,8S)‐ 4 (Scheme 4). In the case of the enolized thioketone 1,3‐diphenylprop‐1‐ene‐2‐thiol ( 10 ) with (S)‐ 2 and (R)‐ 6 in the presence of SiO₂, the enesulfanyl alcohols (1′Z,2S)‐ 11 and (1′E,2S)‐ 11 , and (1′Z,2S)‐ 13 , (1′E,2S)‐ 13 , (1′Z,1R)‐ 15 , and (1′E,1R)‐ 15 , respectively, as well as a 1,3‐oxathiolane (S)‐ 14 were formed (Schemes 6 and 8). In the presence of HCl, the enesulfanyl alcohols (1′Z,2S)‐ 11 , (1′Z,2S)‐ 13 , (1′E,2S)‐ 13 , (1′Z,1R)‐ 15 , and (1′E,1R)‐ 15 cyclize to give the corresponding 1,3‐oxathiolanes (S)‐ 12 , (S)‐ 14 , and (R)‐ 16 , respectively (Schemes 7, 9, and 10). The structures of (1′E,2S)‐ 11 , (S)‐ 12 , and (S)‐ 14 were confirmed by X‐ray crystallography (Figs. 1–3). These results show that 1,3‐oxathiolanes can be prepared directly via the Lewis acid‐catalyzed reactions of oxiranes with non‐enolizable thioketones, and also in two steps with enolized thioketones. The nucleophilic attack of the thiocarbonyl or enesulfanyl S‐atom at the Lewis acid‐complexed oxirane ring proceeds with high regio‐ and stereoselectivity via an S_n 2‐type mechanism.     

Secondary Interactions or Ligand Scrambling? Subtle Steric Effects Govern the Iridium(I) Coordination Chemistry of Phosphoramidite Ligands

The like and unlike isomers of phosphoramidite (P*) ligands are found to react differently with iridium(I), which is a key to explaining the apparently inconsistent results obtained by us and other research groups in a variety of catalytic reactions. Thus, the unlike diastereoisomer (aR,S,S)‐[IrCl(cod)( 1 a )] ( 2 a ; cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene, 1 a =(aR,S,S)‐(1,1′‐binaphthalene)‐2,2′‐diyl bis(1‐phenylethyl)phosphoramidite) forms, upon chloride abstraction, the monosubstituted complex (aR,S,S)‐[Ir(cod)(1,2‐η‐ 1 a ,κP)]⁺ ( 3 a ), which contains a chelating P* ligand that features an η² interaction between a dangling phenyl group and iridium. Under analogous conditions, the like analogue (aR,R,R)‐ 1 a′ gives the disubstituted species (aR,R,R)‐[Ir(cod)( 1 a′ ,κP)₂]⁺ ( 4 a′ ) with monodentate P* ligands. The structure of 3 a was assessed by a combination of X‐ray and NMR spectroscopic studies, which indicate that it is the configuration of the binaphthol moiety (and not that of the dangling benzyl N groups) that determines the configuration of the complex. The effect of the relative configuration of the P* ligand on its iridium(I) coordination chemistry is discussed in the context of our preliminary catalytic results and of apparently random results obtained by other groups in the iridium(I)‐catalyzed asymmetric allylic alkylation of allylic acetates and in rhodium(I)‐catalyzed asymmetric cycloaddition reactions. Further studies with the unlike ligand (aS,R,R)‐(1,1′‐binaphthalene)‐2,2′‐diyl bis{[1‐(1‐naphthalene‐1‐yl)ethyl]phosphoramidite} ( 1 b ) showed a yet different coordination mode, that is, the η⁴‐arene–metal interaction in (aS,R,R)‐[Ir(cod)(1,2,3,4‐η‐ 1 b ,κP)]⁺ ( 3 b ).     

Synthesis of New MeO-BIPHEP-type Chiral Diphosphines by an Improved Way

In this paper,a series of new optically active MeO-BIPHEP-type ligands,(S)-6,6'-dimethoxy-2,2'-bis(di-p-alkoxyphenyl-phosphine)-1,1'-biphenyl[(S)-5b—(S)-5e]were prepared and characterized.Starting from thecommercially available triethyl phosphorite and m-bromoanisole,an optically active(S)-6,6'-dimethoxybiphenyl-2,2'-diyl-bis(phosphonic acid diester)was prepared by an improved way and converted to the corresponding dichlo-rides,which was used as a key intermediate to react with p-alkoxybenzenemagnesium bromide or p-alkoxyphenyllithium to directly give the enantiomerically pure diphosphines 5.     

Stereoselective Reduction of `Capsanthol‐3′‐ones' (=3,6′‐Dihydroxy‐β,κ‐caroten‐3′‐ones) by Complex Hydrides

The (3R,5′R,6′R)‐ and (3R,5′R,6′S)‐capsanthol‐3′‐one (=3,6′‐dihydroxy‐β,κ‐caroten‐3′‐one; 4 and 5 , resp.) were reduced by different complex metal hydrides containing organic ligands. The ratio of the thus obtained diastereoisomeric (3′S)‐capsanthols 2 and 3 or (3′R)‐capsanthols 6 and 7 , respectively, was investigated. Four complex hydrides showed remarkable stereoselectivity and produced the (3′R,6′S)‐capsanthol ( 6 ) in 80 – 100% (see Table 1). The starting materials and the products were characterized by UV/VIS, CD, ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐NMR, and mass spectra.     

Optically Active Cyclophane Receptors for Mono‐ and Disaccharides: The Role of Bidentate Ionic Hydrogen Bonding in Carbohydrate Recognition

A new family of optically active cyclophane receptors for the complexation of mono‐ and disaccharides in competitive protic solvent mixtures is described. Macrocycles (−)‐(R,R,R,R)‐ 1 – 4 feature preorganized binding cavities formed by four 1,1′‐binaphthalene‐2,2′‐diyl phosphate moieties bridged in the 3,3′‐positions by acetylenic or phenylacetylenic spacers. The four phosphodiester groups converge towards the binding cavity and provide efficient bidentate ionic H‐bond acceptor sites (Fig. 2). Benzyloxy groups in the 7,7′‐positions of the 1,1′‐binaphthalene moieties ensure solubility of the nanometer‐sized receptors and prevent undesirable aggregation. The construction of the macrocyclic framework of the four cyclophanes takes advantage of Pd⁰‐catalyzed aryl—acetylene cross‐coupling by the Sonogashira protocol, and oxidative acetylenic homo‐coupling methodology (Schemes 2 and 8 – 10). Several cleft‐type receptors featuring one 1,1′‐binaphthalene‐2,2′‐diyl phosphate moiety were also prepared (Schemes 1, 6, and 7). An undesired side reaction encountered during the synthesis of the target compounds was the formation of naptho[b]furan rings from 3‐ethynylnaphthalene‐2‐ol derivatives, proceeding via 5‐endo‐dig cyclization (Schemes 3 – 5). Computer‐assisted molecular modeling indicated that the macrocycles prefer nonplanar puckered, cyclobutane‐type conformations (Figs. 7 and 8). According to these calculations, receptor (−)‐(R,R,R,R)‐ 1 has, on average, a square binding site, which is complementary in size to one monosaccharide. The three other cyclophanes (−)‐(R,R,R,R)‐ 2 – 4 feature, on average, wider rectangular cavities, providing a good fit to one disaccharide, while being too large for the complexation of one monosaccharide. This substrate selectivity was fully confirmed in ¹H‐NMR binding titrations. The chiroptical properties of the cyclophanes and their nonmacrocyclic precursors were investigated by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. The CD spectra of the acyclic precursors showed a large dependence from the number of 1,1′‐binaphthalene moieties (Fig. 9), and those of the cyclophanes were remarkably influenced by the nature of the functional groups lining the macrocyclic cavity (Fig. 11). Profound differences were also observed between the CD spectra of linear and macrocyclic tetrakis(1,1′‐binaphthalene) scaffolds, which feature very different molecular shapes (Fig. 10). In ¹H‐NMR binding titrations with mono‐ and disaccharides (Fig. 13), concentration ranges were chosen to favor 1 : 1 host−guest binding. This stoichiometry was experimentally established by the curve‐fitting analysis of the titration data and by Job plots. The titration data demonstrate conclusively that the strength of carbohydrate recognition is enhanced with an increasing number of bidentate ionic host−guest H‐bonds (Table 1) in the complex formed. As a result of the formation of these highly stable H‐bonds, carbohydrate complexation in competitive protic solvent mixtures becomes more favorable. Thus, cleft‐type receptors (−)‐(R)‐ 7 and (−)‐(R)‐ 38 with one phosphodiester moiety form weak 1 : 1 complexes only in CD₃CN. In contrast, macrocycle (−)‐(R,R,R,R)‐ 1 with four phosphodiester groups undergoes stable inclusion complexation with monosaccharides in CD₃CN containing 2% CD₃OD. With their larger number of H‐bonding sites, disaccharide substrates bind even more strongly to the four phosphodiester groups lining the cavity of (−)‐(R,R,R,R)‐ 2 and complexation becomes efficient in CD₃CN containing 12% CD₃OD. Finally, the introduction of two additional methyl ester residues further enhances the receptor capacity of (−)‐(R,R,R,R)‐ 3 , and efficient disaccharide complexation occurs already in CD₃CN containing 20% CD₃OD.     

Synthesis of dendronized,chiral conjugated polymers with appendant Fréchet‐type dendrons

New chiral binaphthyl‐based polyarylenes [(S)‐ 3a and (S)‐ 3b ] with appendant Fréchet‐type poly(aryl ether) dendrons (first generation and second generation) were synthesized with Suzuki polycondensation from chiral (S)‐6,6′‐dibromo‐2,2′‐didendron‐substituted 1,1′‐binaphthyl derivatives and p‐phenylene diboronic acid. The polymers were studied with circular dichroism, fluorescence, and ultraviolet–visible spectra. Laser light scattering measurements of (S)‐ 3a and (S)‐ 3b showed that their weight‐average molecular weights were 2.39 × 10⁵ and 1.09 × 10⁴, respectively. The specific optical rotation [α]_D was ?59.6 for (S)‐ 3a and ?62.7 for (S)‐ 3b . These dendronized conjugated polymers exhibited good thermal stability. The glass‐transition temperatures and the initial decomposition temperatures were 187.5 and 265.3 °C for (S)‐ 3a and 173.8 and 308.9 °C for (S)‐ 3b , respectively. (S)‐ 3a and (S)‐ 3b had high fluorescence quantum efficiencies, 87 and 91%, respectively, in tetrahydrofuran. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 1167–1172, 2002     

Functionalized 3,3′,5,5′‐Tetraaryl‐1,1′‐Biphenyls: Novel Platforms for Molecular Receptors

This paper describes the development of novel aromatic platforms for supramolecular construction. By the Suzuki cross‐coupling protocol, a variety of functionalized m‐terphenyl derivatives were prepared (Schemes 1–4). Macrolactamization of bis(ammonium salt) (S,S)‐ 6 with bis(acyl halide) 7 afforded the macrocyclic receptor (S,S)‐ 2 (Scheme 1), which was shown by ¹H‐NMR titration studies to form ‘nesting' complexes of moderate stability (K_a between 130 and 290 M ^?1, 300 K) with octyl glucosides 13 – 15 (Fig. 2) in the noncompetitive solvent CDCl₃. Suzuki cross‐coupling starting from 3,3′,5,5′‐tetrabromo‐1,1′‐biphenyl provided access to a novel series of extended aromatic platforms (Scheme 5) for cleft‐type (Fig. 1) and macrotricyclic receptors such as (S,S,S,S)‐ 1 . Although mass‐spectral evidence for the formation of (S,S,S,S)‐ 1 by macrolactamization between the two functionalized 3,3′,5,5′‐tetraaryl‐1,1′‐biphenyl derivatives (S,S)‐ 33 and 36 was obtained, the ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐NMR spectra of purified material remained rather inconclusive with respect to both purity and constitution. The versatile access to the novel, differentially functionalized 3,3′,5,5′‐tetrabromo‐1,1′‐biphenyl platforms should ensure their wide use in future supramolecular construction.     

New 3,3′[2,2′‐oxy‐bis‐(oxazaborolidine)]‐ethylenes. Structural studies by NMR,X‐ray,and quantum chemistry methods

3,3′‐[2,2′‐Oxy‐bis‐(4S‐methyl, 5R‐phenyl‐1,3,2‐oxazaborolidine)]ethylene ( 4a ) and 3,3′‐[2, 2′‐oxy‐(4S‐methyl‐5R‐phenyl‐1,3,2‐oxazaborolidine)‐ (1,3,2‐benzoxazaborolidine)]ethylene ( 4b ) were synthesized by the reaction of N,N′‐bis‐[(1R,2S)‐norephedrine]oxalyl ( 3a ) or N,N′‐[((1R,2S)‐norephedrine, o‐hydroxyphenylamine]oxalyl ( 3b ) with BH₃‐THF. The molecular structure of these compounds was established by NMR and infrared spectroscopy. The molecular geometry for 4 was studied by means of theoretical methods, resulting in structures that were in total agreement with those obtained by spectroscopy data and X‐ray diffraction. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 16:513–519, 2005; Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ). DOI 10.1002/hc.20151     

Preparation and (E/Z)‐Isomerization of the Diastereoisomers of Violaxanthin

Violaxanthin A (=(all‐E,3S,5S,6R,3′S,5′S,6′R)‐5,6 : 5′,6′‐diepoxy‐5,6,5′,6′‐tetrahydro‐β,β‐carotene‐3,3′‐diol =syn,syn‐violaxanthin; 5 ) and violaxanthin B (=(all‐E,3S,5S,6R,3′S,5′R,6′S)‐5,6 : 5′,6′‐diepoxy‐5,6,5′,6′‐tetrahydro‐β,β‐carotene‐3,3′‐diol=syn,anti‐violaxanthin; 6 ) were prepared by epoxidation of zeaxanthin diacetate ( 1 ) with monoperphthalic acid. Violaxanthins 5 and 6 were submitted to thermal isomerization and I₂‐catalyzed photoisomerization. The structure of the main products, i.e., (9Z)‐ 5 , (13Z)‐ 5 , (9Z)‐ 6 , (9′Z)‐ 6 , (13Z)‐ 6 , and (13′Z)‐ 6 , was determined by their UV/VIS, CD, ¹H‐NMR, ¹³C‐NMR, and mass spectra.     

Cyclobutanoid Amides from Piper arborescens

Two new cyclobutanoid amides, piperarborenine A (=1,1′‐{[(1α,2α,3β,4β)‐2,4‐bis(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)cyclobutane‐1,3‐diyl]dicarbonyl}bis[5,6‐dihydropyridin‐2(1H)‐one]; 1 ) and piperarborenine B (=1,1′‐{[(1α,2α,3β,4β)‐2‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐4‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl)cyclobutane‐1,3‐diyl]dicarbonyl}bis[5,6‐dihydropyridin‐2(1H)‐one]; 2 ) were isolated from the stem of Piper arborescens, besides two known cyclobutanoid amides, piperarboresine (=1,1′‐{[(1α,2α,3β,4β)‐2‐(7‐methoxy‐1,3‐benzodioxol‐5‐yl)‐4‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl)cyclobutane‐1,3‐diyl]dicarbonyl}bis[5,6‐dihydropyridin‐2(1H)‐one]; 3 ) and piplartine‐dimer A (=1,1′‐{[(1α,2α,3β,4β)‐2,4‐bis(3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl)cyclobutane‐1,3‐diyl]dicarbonyl}bis[5,6‐dihydropyridin‐2(1H)‐one]; 4 ). The structures of the two new compounds were determined by spectral analyses.     

Synthesis of Optically Active P‐Chiral and Optically Inactive Oligophosphines

A series of optically active P‐chiral oligophosphines (S,R,R,S)‐ 2 , (S,R,S,S,R,S)‐ 3 , (S,R,S,R,R,S,R,S)‐ 4 , and (S,R,S,R,S,R,R,S,R,S,R,S)‐ 5 with four, six, eight, and 12 chiral phosphorus atoms, respectively, were successfully synthesized by a step‐by‐step oxidative‐coupling reaction from (S,S)‐ 1 . The corresponding optically inactive oligophosphines 1′ – 5′ were also prepared. Their properties were characterized by DSC, XRD, and optical‐rotation analyses. While optically active bisphosphine (S,S)‐ 1 and tetraphosphine (S,R,R,S)‐ 2 behaved as small molecules, octaphosphine (S,R,S,R,R,S,R,S)‐ 4 and dodecaphosphine (S,R,S,R,S,R,R,S,R,S,R,S)‐ 5 exhibited the features of a polymer. Furthermore, DSC and XRD analyses showed that hexaphosphine (S,R,S,S,R,S)‐ 3 is an intermediate between a small molecule and a polymer. Comparison of optically active oligophosphines 1 – 5 with the corresponding optically inactive oligophosphines 1′ – 5′ revealed that the optically active phosphines have higher crystallinity than the optically inactive counterparts. It is considered that the properties of oligophosphines depend on the enantiomeric purity as well as the oligomer chain length.     

Helical Poly(α,β‐unsaturated ketone) with Bulky Pendant of Binaphthyl from Anionic Polymerization of ((−)‐Menthyl (S)‐6′‐Acrylyl‐2′‐methyloxy‐1,1′‐binaphthalene‐2‐carboxylate

((?)‐Menthyl (S)‐6′‐acrylyl‐2′‐methyloxy‐1,1′‐binaphthalene‐2‐carboxylate ( 3 ) was synthesized and anionically polymerized using n‐BuLi as an initiator in toluene. The monomer 3 was levorotatory and had an [α]_D²⁵ value of ?72.4, but its corresponding polymer poly‐ 3 was dextrorotatory and showed an [α]_D²⁵ value of +162.0. Poly‐ 3 was confirmed to exist in the form of one‐handed helical structure in solution by means of comparing the specific optical rotation and the CD spectra with that of 3 and the model compounds such as (?)‐menthyl (S)‐6′‐propionyl‐2′‐methyloxy‐1,1′‐binaphthalene‐2‐carboxylate 2b and (?)‐menthyl (S)‐6′‐heptanoyl‐2′‐methyloxy‐1,1′‐binaphthalene‐2‐carboxylate 2c . This conclusion was also confirmed by the fact that the g‐value of poly‐ 3 is about 11 times of that of monomer 3 .     

Diastereoselective Electrophilic Amination of Chiral 1‐Benzoyl‐2,3,5,6‐tetrahydro‐3‐methyl‐2‐(1‐methylethyl)pyrimidin‐4(1H)‐one for the Asymmetric Syntheses of α‐Substituted α,β‐Diaminopropanoic Acids

The chiral compounds (R)‐ and (S)‐1‐benzoyl‐2,3,5,6‐tetrahydro‐3‐methyl‐2‐(1‐methylethyl)pyrimidin‐4(1H)‐one ((R)‐ and (S)‐ 1 ), derived from (R)‐ and (S)‐asparagine, respectively, were used as convenient starting materials for the preparation of the enantiomerically pure α‐alkylated (alkyl=Me, Et, Bn) α,β‐diamino acids (R)‐ and (S)‐ 11 – 13 . The chiral lithium enolates of (R)‐ and (S)‐ 1 were first alkylated, and the resulting diasteroisomeric products 5 – 7 were aminated with ‘di(tert‐butyl) azodicarboxylate’ (DBAD), giving rise to the diastereoisomerically pure (≥98%) compounds 8 – 10 . The target compounds (R)‐ and (S)‐ 11 – 13 could then be obtained in good yields and high purities by a hydrolysis/hydrogenolysis/hydrolysis sequence.     

New Nonhydrolyzable Mimetics of Sialyl Lewis X and Their Binding Affinity to P‐Selectin

Wittig olefination of (2S,3R,5S,6R)‐5‐(acetyloxy)‐tetrahydro‐6‐[(methoxymethoxy)methyl]‐3‐(phenylthio)‐ 2H‐pyran‐2‐acetaldehyde ((+)‐ 10 ) with {2‐[(2S,3R,4R,5R,6S)‐tetrahydro‐3,4,5‐tris(methoxymethoxy)‐6‐methyl‐ 2H‐pyran‐2‐yl]ethyl}triphenylphosphonium iodide ((?)‐ 11 ) gave a (Z)‐alkene derivative (+)‐ 12 that was converted into (αR,2R,3S,4R,5R,6S)‐tetrahydro‐α,3‐dihydroxy‐2‐(hydroxymethyl)‐5‐(phenylthio)‐6‐{(2Z)‐4‐[(2S,3S,4R,5S,6S)‐tetrahydro‐3,4,5‐trihydroxy‐6‐methyl‐2H‐pyran‐2‐yl]but‐2‐enyl}2H‐pyran‐4‐acetic acid ( 8 ), (αR,2R,3S,4R,6S)‐tetrahydro‐α,3‐dihydroxy‐2‐(hydroxymethyl)‐6‐{4‐[(2S,3S,4R,5S,6S)‐tetrahydro‐3,4,5‐trihydroxy‐6‐methyl‐2H‐pyran‐2‐yl]butyl}‐2H‐pyran‐4‐acetic acid ( 9 ), and simpler analogues without the hydroxyacetic side chain such as (2S,3S,4R,5S,6S)‐tetrahydro‐6‐methyl‐2‐{(2Z)‐4‐[(2S,3R,5S,6R)‐tetrahydro‐5‐hydroxy‐6‐(hydroxymethyl)‐3‐(phenylthio)‐2H‐pyran‐2‐yl]but‐2‐enyl}‐2H‐pyran‐3,4,5‐triol ( 30 ), (2S,3S,4R,5S,6S)‐tetrahydro‐6‐methyl‐2‐{[(2S,5S,6R)‐tetrahydro‐5‐hydroxy‐6‐(hydroxymethyl)‐2H‐pyran‐2‐yl]butyl}‐2H‐pyran‐3,4,5‐ triol ((?)‐ 41 ) and (2S,3S,4R,5S,6S)‐tetrahydro‐6‐methyl‐2‐{(2Z/E))‐4‐[(2R,5S,6R)‐tetrahydro‐5‐hydroxy‐6‐(hydroxymethyl)‐2H‐pyran‐2‐yl]but‐2‐enyl}‐2H‐pyran‐3,4,5‐triol ( 43 ). The key intermediates (+)‐ 10 and (?)‐ 11 were derived from isolevoglucosenone and from L ‐fucose, respectively. The following IC₅₀ values were measured in a ELISA test for the affinities of sialyl Lewis x tetrasaccharide, 8, 9, 30 , (?)‐ 41 , and 43 toward P‐selectin: 0.7, 2.5–2.8, 7.3–8.0, 5.3–5.9, 5.0–5.2, and 3.4–4.1 mM , respectively.     

The Control of the Stereochemistry in the Palladium‐Catalyzed Alternating Styrene/Carbon Monoxide Copolymerization: Effect of the Chirality of the Ligand and of the Ligand‐to‐Palladium Ratio,Preliminary Communication

Diaquapalladium(2+) trifluoromethanesulfonates modified with (4R,4′S)‐ or (4S,4′S)‐2,2′‐bis(4‐benzyl‐4,5‐dihydrooxazole) (C_s‐ and C₂‐ligands) produce isotactic poly(1‐oxo‐2‐phenylpropane‐1,3‐diyl) through copolymerization of styrene with carbon monoxide. However, the same meso‐catalyst in the presence of the free ligand leads to prevailingly syndiotactic growth of the copolymer, whereas the optically active catalyst, when used in the presence of the free enantiomeric ligand, gives an atactic copolymer.