Synthesis and Characterization of a Metal‐Organic Coordination Polymer

A novel energetic microporous metal‐organic coordination polymer {[Ni(tnbpdc)(bpy)(H₂O)₂] · 1.5(DMF)}_n ( 1 ) (tnbpdc = 2, 2′,6, 6′‐tetranitro‐4, 4′‐biphenyl dicarboxylate, bpy = 4, 4′‐bipyridine) was prepared solvothermally and characterized by elemental, IR spectroscopic, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses. The X‐ray crystal structure of 1 revealed a rectangular‐shaped grid constructed with tnbpdc linkers and bpy linkers, with the free tunnel size estimated as 11 × 15 Ų. The thermal stability of the compound was evaluated by differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis. Such complexes may find application as novel heat‐resistant energetic materials.     

A Mononuclear Uranium(IV) Single‐Molecule Magnet with an Azobenzene Radical Ligand

A tetravalent uranium compound with a radical azobenzene ligand, namely, [{(SiMe₂NPh)₃‐tacn}U^IV(η²‐N₂Ph₂^.)] ( 2 ), was obtained by one‐electron reduction of azobenzene by the trivalent uranium compound [U^III{(SiMe₂NPh)₃‐tacn}] ( 1 ). Compound 2 was characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and ¹H NMR, IR, and UV/Vis/NIR spectroscopy. The magnetic properties of 2 and precursor 1 were studied by static magnetization and ac susceptibility measurements, which for the former revealed single‐molecule magnet behaviour for the first time in a mononuclear U^IV compound, whereas trivalent uranium compound 1 does not exhibit slow relaxation of the magnetization at low temperatures. A first approximation to the magnetic behaviour of these compounds was attempted by combining an effective electrostatic model with a phenomenological approach using the full single‐ion Hamiltonian.     

Cation‐Mediated Conversion of the State of Charge in Uranium Arene Inverted‐Sandwich Complexes

Two new arene inverted‐sandwich complexes of uranium supported by siloxide ancillary ligands [K{U(OSi(OtBu)₃)₃}₂(μ‐η⁶:η⁶‐C₇H₈)] ( 3 ) and [K₂{U(OSi(OtBu)₃)₃}₂(μ‐η⁶:η⁶‐C₇H₈)] ( 4 ) were synthesized by the reduction of the parent arene‐bridged complex [{U(OSi(OtBu)₃)₃}₂(μ‐η⁶:η⁶‐C₇H₈)] ( 2 ) with stoichiometric amounts of KC₈ yielding a rare family of inverted‐sandwich complexes in three states of charge. The structural data and computational studies of the electronic structure are in agreement with the presence of high‐valent uranium centers bridged by a reduced tetra‐anionic toluene with the best formulation being U^V–(arene^4?)–U^V, KU^IV–(arene^4?)–U^V, and K₂U^IV–(arene^4?)–U^IV for complexes 2 , 3 , and 4 respectively. The potassium cations in complexes 3 and 4 are coordinated to the siloxide ligands both in the solid state and in solution. The addition of KOTf (OTf=triflate) to the neutral compound 2 promotes its disproportionation to yield complexes 3 and 4 (depending on the stoichiometry) and the U^IV mononuclear complex [U(OSi(OtBu)₃)₃(OTf)(thf)₂] ( 5 ). This unprecedented reactivity demonstrates the key role of potassium for the stability of these complexes.     

Two ZnII mononuclear coordination compounds with pyridinedicarboxylate and auxiliary N‐(pyridin‐4‐ylmethylidene)hydroxylamine ligands

Two new mononuclear coordination compounds, bis{4‐[(hydroxyimino)methyl]pyridinium} diaquabis(pyridine‐2,5‐dicarboxylato‐κ²N,O²)zincate(II), (C₆H₇N₂O)₂[Zn(C₇H₃NO₄)₂(H₂O)₂], (1), and (pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylato‐κ³O²,N,O⁶)bis[N‐(pyridin‐4‐ylmethylidene‐κN)hydroxylamine]zinc(II), [Zn(C₇H₃NO₄)(C₆H₆N₂O)₂], (2), have been synthesized and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffractometry. The centrosymmetric Zn^II cation in (1) is octahedrally coordinated by two chelating pyridine‐2,5‐dicarboxylate ligands and by two water molecules in a distorted octahedral geometry. In (2), the Zn^II cation is coordinated by a tridentate pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylate dianion and by two N‐(pyridin‐4‐ylmethylidene)hydroxylamine molecules in a distorted C₂‐symmetric trigonal bipyramidal coordination geometry.     

Syntheses,Structures, and Luminescence of Metal(II) Coordination Polymers based on Flexible 1,1′‐(1,4‐Butanediyl)bis(imidazole) and Tetrachlorobenzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylate Ligands

The coordination polymers, {[Co(bbim)₂(H₂O)₂](tcbdc) · 2H₂O}_n ( 1 ), {[Ni(tcbdc)(bbim)(H₂O)₂] · 2DMF}_n ( 2 ), and {[Cu₂(tcbdc)₂(bbim)₄] · 4H₂O}_n ( 3 ) [bbim = 1,1′‐(1,4‐butanediyl)bis(imidazole) and tcbdc^2– = tetrachlorobenzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylate] were synthesized and characterized by IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, thermogravimetric analysis, luminescence, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. Complex 1 has a double‐stranded chain structure through doubly bridged [Co(bbim)₂] units. Complex 2 exhibits two‐dimensional square grid, whereas complex 3 has a three‐dimensional porous network structure with an unprecedented 4⁴ · 6¹¹ topological structure through interpenetrating square grid. The water molecules in complex 3 occupy the vacancy through three kinds of hydrogen bond interactions. Upon excitation at 370 nm, complexes 1 – 3 present solid‐state luminescence at room temperature.     

Syntheses,Structures, and Electrochemical Properties of Two Bis‐triazole‐bis‐amide‐based Copper(II) Pyridine‐2,3‐dicarboxylate Coordination Polymers

Abstract. Two bis‐triazole‐bis‐amide‐based copper(II) pyridine‐2,3‐dicarboxylate coordination polymers (CPs), [Cu(2,3‐pydc)(dtb)_0.5(DMF)] · 2H₂O ( 1 ) and [Cu(2,3‐pydc)(dth)_0.5(DMF)] · 2H₂O ( 2 ) (2,3‐H₂pydc = pyridine‐2,3‐dicarboxylic acid, dtb = N,N′‐bis(4H‐1,2,4‐triazole)butanamide, and dth = N,N′‐bis(4H‐1,2,4‐triazole)hexanamide), were synthesized under solvothermal conditions. CPs 1 and 2 show similar two‐dimensional (2D) structures. In 1 , the 2,3‐pydc anions bridge the Cu^II ions into a one‐dimensional (1D) chain. Such 1D chains are linked by the dtb ligands to form a 2D layer. The adjacent 2D layers are extended into a three‐dimensional (3D) supramolecular architecture by hydrogen‐bonding interactions. The electrochemical properties of 1 and 2 were investigated.     

Single‐Crystal to Single‐Crystal Linker Substitution,Linker Place Exchange,and Transmetalation Reactions in Interpenetrated Pillared–Bilayer Zinc(II) Metal–Organic Frameworks

A twofold interpenetrated pillared–bilayer framework, {[Zn₃( L )₂( L₂ )(DMF)] ? (18DMF)(6H₂O)}_n ( 1 ), has been synthesized from the ligands tris(4′‐carboxybiphenyl)amine ( H₃L ) and 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethylene ( L₂ ). The structure contains [Zn₃(COO)₆] secondary building units (SBUs), in which three Zn^II ions are almost linear with carboxylate bridging. This framework undergoes reversible pillar linker substitution reactions at the terminal Zn^II centers with three different dipyridyl linkers of different lengths to afford three daughter frameworks, 2 – 4 . Frameworks 2 – 4 are interconvertible through reversible linker substitution reactions. Also, competitive linker‐exchange experiments show preferential incorporation of linker L₃ in the parent framework 1 . The larger linker L₅ does not undergo such substitution reactions and framework 5 , which contains this linker, can be synthesized solvothermally as a twofold interpenetrated structure. Interestingly, when framework 5 is dipped in a solution of L₃ in DMF, linker substitution takes place as before, but linker L₅ now moves and diagonally binds two Zn^II centers to afford 6 as a nonpenetrated single framework. This linker place exchange reaction is unprecedented. All of these reactions take place in a single‐crystal to single‐crystal (SC‐SC) manner, and have been observed directly through X‐ray crystallography. In addition, each 3D framework undergoes complete copper(II) transmetalation.     

Structural analysis of interpenetrated methyl‐modified MOF‐5 and its gas‐adsorption properties

The first example of an interpenetrated methyl‐modified MOF‐5 with the formula Zn₄O(DMBDC)₃(DMF)₂, where DMBDC^2? is 2,5‐dimethylbenzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylate and DMF is N,N‐dimethylformamide (henceforth denoted as Me₂MOF‐5‐int ), namely, poly[tris(μ₄‐2,5‐dimethylbenzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylato)bis(N,N‐dimethylformamide)‐μ₄‐oxido‐tetrazinc(II)], [Zn₄(C₁₀H₈O₄)₃O(C₃H₇NO)₂]_n, has been obtained from a solvothermal synthesis of 2,5‐dimethylbenzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylic acid and Zn(NO₃)₂·6H₂O in DMF. A systematic study revealed that the choice of solvent is of critical importance for the synthesis of phase‐pure Me₂MOF‐5‐int , which was thoroughly characterized by single‐crystal and powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD), as well as by gas‐adsorption analyses. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area of Me₂MOF‐5‐int (660 m² g^?1), determined by N₂ adsorption, is much lower than that of nonpenetrated Me₂MOF‐5 (2420 m² g^?1). However, Me₂MOF‐5‐int displays an H₂ uptake capacity of 1.26 wt% at 77 K and 1.0 bar, which is comparable to that of non‐interpenetrated Me₂MOF‐5 (1.51 wt%).     

A CdII‐Based Metal‐Organic Framework with pcu Topology as Turn‐On Fluorescent Sensor for Al3+

A new metal‐organic framework (MOF) {[Cd₂(bbib)₂(ndc)₂]?2DMF}_n ( JXUST‐1 ) (bbib=1,3‐bis(benzimidazolyl)benzene, H₂ndc=1,4‐naphthalenedicarboxylic acid, DMF=N,N‐dimethylformamide) has been solvothermally synthesized and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, PXRD, TGA, IR and elemental analysis. JXUST‐1 exhibits a three‐dimensional 6‐connected pcu topology with a Schläfli symbol {4¹².6³} constructed by [Cd₂(CO₂)₃] secondary building units. Fluorescence studies show that this MOF can sensitively and selectively recognize Al³⁺ via a fluorescence enhancement effect, and the detection limit is 0.048 ppm. Furthermore, JXUST‐1 displays relatively good thermal and chemical stabilities as well as reusability. All these results suggest JXUST‐1 to be a highly selective and recyclable luminescent sensing material for the detection of Al³⁺.     

Synthesis,Characterization, and Properties of Four Metal Complexes with Mulitdentate N‐Acyl‐Salicylhydrazide Ligands

The reactions of the new nitrilotriacetic acid N′,N′,N′‐tri(salicyloyl)trihydrazide (Ntash) with the corresponding metal salts gave four new complexes [Pb₄(bshz)₂] · 2DMF ( 1 ), [Co₂(bshz)(C₅H₅N)₆] · 2ClO₄ · (C₅H₅N) · 2H₂O ( 2 ), [Cu₃(fshz)₂(C₅H₅N)₂] ( 3 ), and [Zn₃(fshz)₂(C₅H₅N)₃]_n · 2DMF ( 4 ), in which two multidentate ligands, namely N,N′‐disalicyloylhydrazine (H₄bshz) and N‐formylsalicylhydrazide (H₃fshz) were generated in situ from Ntash. The structures of these complexes were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. Complex 1 presents a novel tetranuclear lead(II) cluster structure with the four lead(II) cations in “hemidirected” coordination spheres. The neighboring tetranuclear clusters of 1 are connected by DMF molecules through weak Pb–O bonds, forming one‐dimensional ribbons. Complexes 2 and 3 show dinuclear and linear trinuclear structures with the corresponding Co^III and Cu^II ions in distorted octahedral and square‐planar coordination environments, respectively. Complex 4 exhibits a one‐dimensional zigzag chain structure. The magnetic properties of 3 and the photoluminescent properties of 4 were also investigated.     

Exchange of Coordinated Solvent During Crystallization of a Metal–Organic Framework Observed by In Situ High‐Energy X‐ray Diffraction

Using time‐resolved monochromatic high energy X‐ray diffraction, we present an in situ study of the solvothermal crystallisation of a new MOF [Yb₂(BDC)₃(DMF)₂]?H₂O (BDC=benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylate and DMF=N,N‐dimethylformamide) under solvothermal conditions, from mixed water/DMF solvent. Analysis of high resolution powder patterns obtained reveals an evolution of lattice parameters and electron density during the crystallisation process and Rietveld analysis shows that this is due to a gradual topochemical replacement of coordinated solvent molecules. The water initially coordinated to Yb³⁺ is replaced by DMF as the reaction progresses.     

Syntheses,Structures and Characterization of Four Metal‐Organic Frameworks constructed by 2,2′,6,6′‐Tetramethoxy‐4,4′‐biphenyldicarboxylic Acid

Four metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs), {[Mn_3.5L(OH)(HCOO)₄(DMF)] · H₂O} ( 1 ), {[In_2.5L₂O(OH)_1.5(H₂O)₂] · DMF · CH₃CN · 2H₂O} ( 2 ), {[Pb₄L₃O(DMA)] · CH₃CN} ( 3 ), and {[LaL(NO₃)(DMF)₂] · 2H₂O} ( 4 ) were synthesized by utilizing the ligand 2,2′,6,6′‐tetramethoxy‐4,4′‐biphenyldicarboxylic acid (H₂L) via solvothermal methods. All MOFs were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, powder X‐ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, and infrared spectroscopy. In 1 , the Mn²⁺ ions are interconnected by formic groups in situ produced via DMF decomposition to form a rare 2D macrocyclic plane, which is further linked by L^2– to construct the final 3D network. In 2 , 1D zip‐like infinite chain is formed and then interconnected to build the 3D framework. In 3 , a [Pb₆(μ₄‐O)₂(O₂C)₁₀(DMA)₂] cluster with a centrosymmetric [Pb₆(μ₄‐O)₂]⁸⁺ octahedral core is formed in the 3D structure. In 4 , the La³⁺ ions are connected with each other through carboxylate groups of L^2– to generate 1D zigzag chain, which is further linked by L^2– to construct a 3D network with sra topology. Solid photoluminescence properties of 3 and 4 were also investigated.     

Insights into the Mechanism of Extraction of Uranium (VI) from Nitric Acid Solution into an Ionic Liquid by using Tri‐n‐butyl phosphate

We present new results on the liquid–liquid extraction of uranium (VI) from a nitric acid aqueous phase into a tri‐n‐butyl phosphate/1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (TBP/[C₄mim][Tf₂N]) phase. The individual solubilities of the ionic‐liquid ions in the upper part of the biphasic system are measured over the whole acidic range and as a function of the TBP concentration. New insights into the extraction mechanism are obtained through the in situ characterization of the extracted uranyl complexes by coupling UV/Vis and extended X‐ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy. We propose a chemical model to explain uranium (VI) extraction that describes the data through a fit of the uranyl distribution ratio D_U. In this model, at low acid concentrations uranium (VI) is extracted as the cationic complex [UO₂(TBP)₂]²⁺, by an exchange with one proton and one C₄mim⁺. At high acid concentrations, the extraction proceeds through a cationic exchange between [UO₂(NO₃)(HNO₃)(TBP)₂]⁺ and one C₄mim⁺. As a consequence of this mechanism, the variation of D_U as a function of TBP concentration depends on the C₄mim⁺ concentration in the aqueous phase. This explains why noninteger values are often derived by analysis of D_U versus [TBP] plots to determine the number of TBP molecules involved in the extraction of uranyl in an ionic‐liquid phase.     

In‐ and Out‐of‐Cavity Interactions by Modulating the Size of Ruthenium Metallarectangles

Cationic (arene)ruthenium‐based tetranuclear complexes of the general formula [Ru₄(η⁶‐p‐cymene)₄(μ‐N∩N)₂(μ‐OO∩OO)₂]⁴⁺ were obtained from the dinuclear (arene)ruthenium complexes [Ru₂(η⁶‐p‐cymene)₂(μ‐OO∩OO)₂Cl₂] (p‐cymene=1‐methyl‐4‐(1‐methylethyl)benzene, OO∩OO=5,8‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐naphthoquinonato(2?), 9,10‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐anthraquinonato(2?), or 6,11‐dihydroxynaphthacene‐5,12‐dionato(2?)) by reaction with pyrazine or bipyridine linkers (N∩N=pyrazine, 4,4′‐bipyridine, 4,4′‐[(1E)‐ethene‐1,2‐diyl]bis[pyridine]) in the presence of silver trifluoromethanesulfonate (CF₃SO₃Ag) (Scheme). All complexes 4 – 12 were isolated in good yield as CF₃SO salts, and characterized by NMR and IR spectroscopy. The host–guest properties of the metallarectangles incorporating 4,4′‐bipyridine and (4,4′‐[(1E)‐ethene‐1,2‐diyl]bis[pyridine] linkers were studied in solution by means of multiple NMR experiments (1D, ROESY, and DOSY). The largest metallarectangles 10 – 12 incorporating (4,4′‐[(1E)‐ethene‐1,2‐diyl]bis[pyridine] linkers are able to host an anthracene, pyrene, perylene, or coronene molecule in their cavity, while the medium‐size metallarectangles 7 – 9 incorporating 4,4′‐bipyridine linkers are only able to encapsulate anthracene. However, out‐of‐cavity interactions are observed between these 4,4′‐bipyridine‐containing rectangles and pyrene, perylene, or coronene. In contrast, the small pyrazine‐containing metallarectangles 4 – 6 show no interaction in solution with this series of planar aromatic molecules.     

Poly[(μ4‐adamantane‐1,3‐dicarboxylato‐κ5O1:O1′:O3,O3′:O3′)(μ3‐adamantane‐1,3‐dicarboxylato‐κ5O1,O1′:O3,O3′:O3′)dimagnesium]: a layered coordination polymer

The title compound, [Mg₂(C₁₂H₁₄O₄)₂]_n, is the first example of an s‐block metal adamantanedicarboxylate coordination polymer. The asymmetric unit comprises two crystallographically unique Mg^II centers and two adamantane‐1,3‐dicarboxylate ligands. The compound is constructed from a combination of chains of corner‐sharing magnesium‐centered polyhedra, parallel to the a axis, connected by organic linkers to form a layered polymer. The two Mg^II centers are present in distorted tetrahedral and octahedral coordination environments derived from carboxylate O atoms. Tetrahedrally coordinated Mg^II centers have been reported in organometallic compounds, but this is the first time that such coordination has been observed in a magnesium‐based coordination polymer. The bond valance sums of the two Mg^II centers are 2.05 and 2.11 valence units, matching well with the expected value of 2.     

Structural Diversity in Luminescent MOFs Containing a Bent Electron‐rich Dicarboxylate Linker and a Flexible Capping Ligand: Selective Detection of 4‐Nitroaniline in Water

A combination of a bent bis(naphthalene) and hydroxy‐based dicarboxylate linker and a flexible bis(tridentate)polypyridyl ligand has been employed to self‐assemble with two different d¹⁰ metal centers, Zn^II and Cd^II, to form structurally diversified luminescent metal–organic frameworks, [Zn₂(tpbn)(mbhna)₂(H₂O)₂]?4 H₂O?1.5DMF ( 1 ) and {[Cd₂(tpbn)(mbhna)₂]?2DMF}_n ( 2 ), respectively (where, tpbn=N,N′,N′′,N′′′‐tetrakis(pyridine‐2‐ylmethyl)butane‐1,4‐diamine and H₂mbhna=4,4′‐methylene‐bis[3‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthalene carboxylic acid]). Both 1 and 2 are characterized and analyzed by various analytical techniques including single‐crystal X‐ray diffractometry. Their excellent emissive nature is studied in different solvents and further utilized to selectively detect aromatic amines, particularly 4‐nitroaniline in water with detection limits at sub‐ppm level. The difference in sensing activity of 1 and 2 toward 4‐NA is corroborated well with their structures. The mechanism of action has been established through Stern–Volmer plot, spectral overlap, time‐resolved lifetime studies and HOMO–LUMO energy calculations. In addition, 1 and 2 are found to be recyclable and display good stability after sensing experiments.     

Four‐, five‐ and six‐coordinated transition metal complexes based on naphthalimide Schiff base ligands: Synthesis,crystal structure and properties

Two bidentate Schiff base ligands (HL¹ = N‐n‐butyl‐4‐[(E)‐2‐(((2‐aminoethyl)imino)methyl)phenol]‐1,8‐naphthalimide; and HL² = N‐n‐butyl‐4‐[(E)‐2‐(((2‐aminoethyl)imino)methyl)‐6‐methoxyphenol]‐1,8‐naphthalimide) with their metal complexes [Cu(L¹)₂] ( 1 ), [Zn(L¹)₂(Py)]₂?H₂O ( 2 ) and [Ni(L²)₂(DMF)₂] ( 3 ) have been synthesized and characterized. Single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis reveals that complex 1 has a four‐coordinated square geometry, while complex 2 is a five‐coordinated square pyramidal structure and complex 3 is a distorted six‐coordinated octahedral structure. Cyclic voltammograms of 1 indicate an irreversible Cu²⁺/Cu⁺ couple. In vitro antioxidant activity assay demonstrates that the ligands and the two complexes 1 and 3 display high scavenging activity against hydroxyl (HO^?) and superoxide (O₂^??) radicals. Moreover, the fluorescence properties of the ligands and complexes 1 – 3 were studied in the solid state. Metal‐mediated enhancement is observed in 2 , whereas metal‐mediated fluorescence quenching occurs with 1 and 3 .     

Syntheses,Crystal Structures,and Properties of Lead(II), ­Zinc(II), and Manganese(II) Complexes Constructed from 2, 3, 5, 6‐Tetraiodo‐1, 4‐benzenedicarboxylic Acid

Three new coordination compounds, [Pb(HBDC‐I₄)₂(DMF)₄]( 1 ) and [M(BDC‐I₄)(MeOH)₂(DMF)₂]_n (M = Zn^II for 2 and Mn^II for ( 3 ) (H₂BDC‐I₄ = 2, 3, 5, 6‐tetraiodo‐1, 4‐benzenedicarboxylic acid), were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy, thermogravimetric (TG) analysis, and X‐ray single crystal structure analysis. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction reveals that 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c and has a discrete mononuclear structure, which is further assembled to form a two‐dimensional (2D) layer through intermolecular O–H ··· O and C–H ··· O hydrogen bonding interactions. The isostructural compounds 2 and 3 crystallize in the space group P2₁/c and have similar one‐dimensional (1D) chain structures that are extended into three‐dimensional (3D) supramolecular networks by interchain C–H ··· π interactions. The Pb^II and Zn^II complexes 1 and 2 display similar emissions at 472 nm in the solid state, which essentially are intraligand transitions.     

Post‐Synthetic Reversible Incorporation of Organic Linkers into Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks through Single‐Crystal‐to‐Single‐Crystal Transformations and Modification of Gas‐Sorption Properties

The porous metal–organic framework (MOF) {[Zn₂(TCPBDA)(H₂O)₂]?30 DMF?6 H₂O}_n ( SNU‐30 ; DMF=N,N‐dimethylformamide) has been prepared by the solvothermal reaction of N,N,N′,N′‐tetrakis(4‐carboxyphenyl)biphenyl‐4,4′‐diamine (H₄TCPBDA) and Zn(NO₃)₂?6 H₂O in DMF/tBuOH. The post‐synthetic modification of SNU‐30 by the insertion of 3,6‐di(4‐pyridyl)‐1,2,4,5‐tetrazine (bpta) affords single‐crystalline {[Zn₂(TCPBDA)(bpta)]?23 DMF?4 H₂O}_n ( SNU‐31 SC ), in which channels are divided by the bpta linkers. Interestingly, unlike its pristine form, the bridging bpta ligand in the MOF is bent due to steric constraints. SNU‐31 can be also prepared through a one‐pot solvothermal synthesis from Zn^II, TCPBDA^4?, and bpta. The bpta linker can be liberated from this MOF by immersion in N,N‐diethylformamide (DEF) to afford the single‐crystalline SNU‐30 SC , which is structurally similar to SNU‐30 . This phenomenon of reversible insertion and removal of the bridging ligand while preserving the single crystallinity is unprecedented in MOFs. Desolvated solid SNU‐30′ adsorbs N₂, O₂, H₂, CO₂, and CH₄ gases, whereas desolvated SNU‐31′ exhibits selective adsorption of CO₂ over N₂, O₂, H₂, and CH₄, thus demonstrating that the gas adsorption properties of MOF can be modified by post‐synthetic insertion/removal of a bridging ligand.     

Ex‐Situ Kinetic Investigations of the Formation of the Poly‐Oxo Cluster U38

The ex‐situ qualitative study of the kinetic formation of the poly‐oxo cluster U₃₈, has been investigated after the solvothermal reaction. The resulting products have been characterized by means of powder XRD and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for the solid phase and UV/Vis, X‐ray absorption near edge structure (XANES), extended X‐ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS), and NMR spectroscopies for the supernatant liquid phase. The analysis of the different synthesis batches, stopped at different reaction times, revealed the formation of spherical crystallites of UO₂ from t=3 h, after the formation of unknown solid phases at an early stage. The crystallization of U₃₈ occurred from t=4 h at the expense of UO₂, and is completed after t=8 h. Starting from pure uranium(IV) species in solution (t=0–1 h), oxidation reactions are observed with a U^IV/U^VI ratio of 70:30 for t=1–3 h. Then, the ratio is inversed with a U^IV/U^VI ratio of 25/75, when the precipitation of UO₂ occurs. Thorough SEM observations of the U₃₈ crystallites showed that the UO₂ aggregates are embedded within. This may indicate that UO₂ acts as reservoir of uranium(IV), for the formation of U₃₈, stabilized by benzoate and THF ligands. During the early stages of the U₃₈ crystallization, a transient crystallized phase appeared at t=4 h. Its crystal structure revealed a new dodecanuclear moiety (U₁₂), based on the inner hexanuclear core of {U₆O₈} type, decorated by three additional pairs of dinuclear U₂ units. The U₁₂ motif is stabilized by benzoate, oxalates, and glycolate ligands.