New Ruthenium(II) Complexes Functionalized with Coumarin Derivatives: Synthesis,Energy‐Transfer‐Based Sensing of Esterase,Cytotoxicity, and Imaging Studies

Two new bichromophoric ruthenium(II) complexes, [Ru(bpy)₂(bpy‐CM)](PF₆)₂ and [Ru(bpy)₂(bpy‐CM343)](PF₆)₂ (bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine, CM=coumarin) with appended coumarin ligands have been designed and synthesized. The energy‐transfer‐based sensing of esterase by the complexes has been studied by using UV/Vis and luminescence spectroscopic methods. The cytotoxicity and the cellular uptake of one of the complexes have also been investigated.     

Application of a Structure/Oxidation‐State Correlation to Complexes of Bridging Azo Ligands

Based on data from more than 40 crystal structures of metal complexes with azo‐based bridging ligands (2,2′‐azobispyridine, 2,2′‐azobis(5‐chloropyrimidine), azodicarbonyl derivatives), a correlation between the N? N bond lengths (d_NN) and the oxidation state of the ligand (neutral, neutral/back‐donating, radical‐anionic, dianionic) was derived. This correlation was applied to the analysis of four ruthenium compounds of 2,2′‐azobispyridine (abpy), that is, the new asymmetrical rac‐[(acac)₂Ru1(μ‐abpy)Ru2(bpy)₂](ClO₄)₂ ([ 1 ](ClO₄)₂), [Ru(acac)₂(abpy)] ( 2 ), [Ru(bpy)₂(abpy)](ClO₄)₂ ([ 3 ](ClO₄)₂), and meso‐[(bpy)₂Ru(μ‐abpy)Ru(bpy)₂](ClO₄)₃ ([ 4 ](ClO₄)₃; acac^?=2,4‐pentanedionato, bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine). In agreement with DFT calculations, both mononuclear species 2 and 3 ²⁺ can be described as ruthenium(II) complexes of unreduced abpy⁰, with 1.295(5)<d_NN<1.320(3) Å, thereby exhibiting effects from π back‐donation. However, the abpy ligand in both the asymmetrical diamagnetic compound 1 ²⁺ (d_NN=1.374(6) Å) and the symmetrical compound 4 ³⁺ (d_NN=1.360(7), 1.368(8) Å) must be formulated as abpy^.?. Remarkably, the addition of [Ru^II(bpy)₂]²⁺ to mononuclear [Ru^II(acac)₂(abpy⁰)] induces intracomplex electron‐transfer under participation of the noninnocent abpy bridge to yield rac‐[(acac)₂Ru1^III(μ‐abpy^.?)Ru2^II(bpy)₂]²⁺ ( 1 ²⁺) with strong antiferromagnetic coupling between abpy^.? and Ru^III (DFT (B3LYP/LANL2DZ/6‐31G*)‐calculated triplet–singlet energy separation E_S=1?E_S=0=11739 cm^?1). Stepwise one‐electron transfer was studied for compound 1 ⁿ, n=1?, 0, 1+, 2+, 3+, by UV/Vis/NIR spectroelectrochemistry, EPR spectroscopy, and by DFT calculations. Whereas the first oxidation of compound 1 ²⁺ was found to mainly involve the central ligand to produce an (abpy⁰)‐bridged Class I mixed‐valent Ru1^IIIRu2^II species, the first reduction of compound 1 ²⁺ affected both the bridge and Ru1 atom to form a radical complex ( 1 ⁺), with considerable metal participation in the spin‐distribution. Further reduction moves the spin towards the {Ru2(bpy)₂} entity.     

DNA-Targeting RuII-Polypyridyl Complex with a Long-Lived Intraligand Excited State as a Potential Photodynamic Therapy Agent

Subtle ligand modifications on Ru^II-polypyridyl complexes may result in different excited-state characteristics, which provides the opportunity to tune their photo-physicochemical properties and subsequently change their biological functions. Here, a DNA-targeting Ru^II-polypyridyl complex (named Ru1 ) with highly photosensitizing ³IL (intraligand) excited state was designed based on a classical DNA-intercalator [Ru(bpy)₂(dppz)] ⋅ 2 PF₆ by incorporation of the dppz (dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine) ligand tethered with a pyrenyl group, which has four orders of magnitude higher potency than the model complex [Ru(bpy)₂(dppz)] ⋅ 2 PF₆ upon light irradiation. This study provides a facile strategy for the design of organelle-targeting Ru^II-polypyridyl complexes with dramatically improved photobiological activity.     

Density Functional Theory Calculations on Oxidative CC Bond Cleavage and NO Bond Formation of [RuII(bpy)2(diamine)]2+ via Reactive Ruthenium Imide Intermediates

DFT calculations are performed on [Ru^II(bpy)₂(tmen)]²⁺ ( M1 , tmen=2,3‐dimethyl‐2,3‐butanediamine) and [Ru^II(bpy)₂(heda)]²⁺ ( M2 , heda=2,5‐dimethyl‐2,5‐hexanediamine), and on the oxidation reactions of M1 to give the C?C bond cleavage product [Ru^II(bpy)₂(NH=CMe₂)₂]²⁺ ( M3 ) and the N?O bond formation product [Ru^II(bpy)₂(ONCMe₂CMe₂NO)]²⁺ ( M4 ). The calculated geometrical parameters and oxidation potentials are in good agreement with the experimental data. As revealed by the DFT calculations, [Ru^II(bpy)₂(tmen)]²⁺ ( M1 ) can undergo oxidative deprotonation to generate Ru‐bis(imide) [Ru(bpy)₂(tmen‐4 H)]⁺ ( A ) or Ru‐imide/amide [Ru(bpy)₂(tmen‐3 H)]²⁺ ( A′ ) intermediates. Both A and A′ are prone to C?C bond cleavage, with low reaction barriers (ΔG^≠) of 6.8 and 2.9 kcal mol^?1 for their doublet spin states ² A and ² A′ , respectively. The calculated reaction barrier for the nucleophilic attack of water molecules on ² A′ is relatively high (14.2 kcal mol^?1). These calculation results are in agreement with the formation of the Ru^II‐bis(imine) complex M3 from the electrochemical oxidation of M1 in aqueous solution. The oxidation of M1 with Ce^IV in aqueous solution to afford the Ru^II‐dinitrosoalkane complex M4 is proposed to proceed by attack of the cerium oxidant on the ruthenium imide intermediate. The findings of ESI‐MS experiments are consistent with the generation of a ruthenium imide intermediate in the course of the oxidation.     

Redox processes of ruthenium (II) polypyridine complexes induced by fast-atom bombardment mass spectrometry

Fast-atom bombardment (FAB) mass spectrometry in the negative ionization mode enables the sputtering into the gas phase of the ruthenium complexes [Ru(2,2′-bipyridine[bpy])₂(2,5-bis) (pyrydil)pyrazine[dpp])](PF₆)₂; [Ru(bpy)₂,(2,3dpp)](PF₆)₂;[Ru(bpy)₂,(2,3-dpp-Me)]( PF₆)₃; and [Ru(bpy)₂(?-2,3-dpp)]₂ RuCl₂(PF₆)₄ as intact radical anions. These data, combined with those avaiiable from the positive FAB spectra allow a full characterization of the analytes.     

系列含4，5-二氮杂-9，9’-螺二芴配体的钌配合物的合成及其性能研究

本文合成了3个新钌（Ⅱ）配合物,[Ru（bpy）₂（SB）]（PF₆）₂、[Ru（bpy）（SB）₂]（PF₆）₂和[Ru（SB）₃]（PF₆）₂（bpy=2,2’-bipyridine,SB=4,5-diaza-9,9’-spirobifluorene）,通过核磁和元素分析对配合物的结构进行了确定。[Ru（bpy）₂（SB）]（PF₆）₂通过X射线单晶衍射确认了结构。研究了配合物的光物理性能。结果表明[Ru（bpy）₂（SB）]（PF₆）₂在乙腈中的发桔红光,波长为606nm,量子产率约为0.0012。在同样条件下[Ru（bpy）（SB）₂]（PF₆）₂和[Ru（SB）₃]（PF₆）₂的发光非常微弱甚至几乎没有发光。还研究了这些配合物的电致化学发光性能。随着配体中SB含量的增加,发光的峰电压从1.36V增加到1.58V,相对发光强度从731降低到52。     

系列含4,5-二氮杂-9,9′-螺二芴配体的钌配合物的合成及其性能研究(英文)

合成了3个钌髤配合物,[Ru(bpy)2(SB)](PF6)2、[Ru(bpy)(SB)2](PF6)2和[Ru(SB)3](PF6)2(bpy=2,2′-bipyridine,SB=4,5-diaza-9,9′-spirobifluorene),通过核磁和元素分析对配合物的结构进行了确定。[Ru(bpy)2(SB)](PF6)2通过X射线单晶衍射确认了结构。研究了配合物的光物理性能。结果表明[Ru(bpy)2(SB)](PF6)2在乙腈中的发桔红光,波长为606 nm,量子产率约为0.001 2。在同样条件下[Ru(bpy)(SB)2](PF6)2和[Ru(SB)3](PF6)2的发光非常微弱甚至几乎没有发光。还研究了这些配合物的电致化学发光性能。随着配体中SB含量的增加,发光的峰电压从1.36 V增加到1.58 V,相对发光强度从731降低到52。     

A New Luminescent Ruthenium(II) Polypyridine‐derived Dipicolylamine Complex as a Sensor for Cu2+ Ions

A chemo‐sensor [Ru(bpy)₂(bpy‐DPF)](PF₆)₂ ( 1 ) (bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine, bpy‐DPF=2,2′‐bipyridyl‐4,4′‐bis(N,N‐di(2‐picolyl))formylamide) for Cu²⁺ using di(2‐picolyl)amine (DPA) as the recognition group and a ruthenium(II) complex as the reporting group was synthesized and characterized successfully. It demonstrates a high selectivity and efficient signaling behavior only for Cu²⁺ with obvious red‐shifted MLCT (metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer transitions) absorptions and dramatic fluorescence quenching compared with Zn²⁺ and other metal ions.     

Experimental and DFT Evidence for the Fractional Non‐Innocence of a β‐Diketonate Ligand

New compounds [Ru(pap)₂(L)](ClO₄), [Ru(pap)(L)₂], and [Ru(acac)₂(L)] (pap=2‐phenylazopyridine, L^?=9‐oxidophenalenone, acac^?=2,4‐pentanedionate) have been prepared and studied regarding their electron‐transfer behavior, both experimentally and by using DFT calculations. [Ru(pap)₂(L)](ClO₄) and [Ru(acac)₂(L)] were characterized by crystal‐structure analysis. Spectroelectrochemistry (EPR, UV/Vis/NIR), in conjunction with cyclic voltammetry, showed a wide range of about 2 V for the potential of the Ru^III/II couple, which was in agreement with the very different characteristics of the strongly π‐accepting pap ligand and the σ‐donating acac^? ligand. At the rather high potential of +1.35 V versus SCE, the oxidation of L^? into L^. could be deduced from the near‐IR absorption of [Ru^III(pap)(L^.)(L^?)]²⁺. Other intense long‐wavelength transitions, including LMCT (L^?→Ru^III) and LL/CT (pap^.?→L^?) processes, were confirmed by TD‐DFT results. DFT calculations and EPR data for the paramagnetic intermediates allowed us to assess the spin densities, which revealed two cases with considerable contributions from L‐radical‐involving forms, that is, [Ru^III(pap⁰)₂(L^?)]²⁺?[Ru^II(pap⁰)₂(L^.)]²⁺ and [Ru^III(pap⁰)(L^?)₂]⁺?[Ru^II(pap⁰)(L^?)(L^?)]⁺. Calculations of electrogenerated complex [Ru^II(pap^.?)(pap⁰)(L^?)] displayed considerable negative spin density (?0.188) at the bridging metal.     

Metal‐catalyzed reversible conversion between chemical and electrical energy designed towards a sustainable society

Proton dissociation of an aqua‐Ru‐quinone complex, [Ru(trpy)(q)(OH₂)]²⁺ (trpy = 2,2′ : 6′,2″‐terpyridine, q = 3,5‐di‐t‐butylquinone) proceeded in two steps (pK_a = 5.5 and ca. 10.5). The first step simply produced [Ru(trpy)(q)(OH)]⁺, while the second one gave an unusual oxyl radical complex, [Ru(trpy)(sq)(O^?.)]⁰ (sq = 3,5‐di‐t‐butylsemiquinone), owing to an intramolecular electron transfer from the resultant O^2? to q. A dinuclear Ru complex bridged by an anthracene framework, [Ru₂(btpyan)(q)₂(OH)₂]²⁺ (btpyan = 1,8‐bis(2,2′‐terpyridyl)anthracene), was prepared to place two Ru(trpy)(q)(OH) groups at a close distance. Deprotonation of the two hydroxy protons of [Ru₂(btpyan)(q)₂(OH)₂]²⁺ generated two oxyl radical Ru‐O^?. groups, which worked as a precursor for O₂ evolution in the oxidation of water. The [Ru₂(btpyan)(q)₂(OH)₂](SbF₆)₂ modified ITO electrode effectively catalyzed four‐electron oxidation of water to evolve O₂ (TON = 33500) under electrolysis at +1.70 V in H₂O (pH 4.0). Various physical measurements and DFT calculations indicated that a radical coupling between two Ru(sq)(O^?.) groups forms a (cat)Ru‐O‐O‐Ru(sq) (cat = 3,5‐di‐t‐butylcathechol) framework with a μ‐superoxo bond. Successive removal of four electrons from the cat, sq, and superoxo groups of [Ru₂(btpyan)(cat)(sq)(μ‐O₂^?)]⁰ assisted with an attack of two water (or OH^?) to Ru centers, which causes smooth O₂ evolution with regeneration of [Ru₂(btpyan)(q)₂(OH)₂]²⁺. Deprotonation of an Ru‐quinone‐ammonia complex also gave the corresponding Ru‐semiquinone‐aminyl radical. The oxidized form of the latter showed a high catalytic activity towards the oxidation of methanol in the presence of base. Three complexes, [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)₂]²⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(C(O)OH)]⁺, and [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(CO₂)]⁰ exist as an equilibrium mixture in water. Treatment of [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)₂]²⁺ with BH₄^? gave [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(C(O)H)]⁺, [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(CH₂OH)]⁺, and [Ru(bpy)₂(CO)(OH₂)]²⁺ with generation of CH₃OH in aqueous conditions. Based on these results, a reasonable catalytic pathway from CO₂ to CH₃OH in electro‐ and photochemical CO₂ reduction is proposed. A new pbn (pbn = 2‐pyridylbenzo[b]‐1,5‐naphthyridine) ligand was designed as a renewable hydride donor for the six‐electron reduction of CO₂. A series of [Ru(bpy)_3‐n(pbn)_n]²⁺ (n = 1, 2, 3) complexes undergoes photochemical two‐ (n = 1), four‐ (n = 2), and six‐electron reductions (n = 3) under irradiation of visible light in the presence of N(CH₂CH₂OH)₃. © 2009 The Japan Chemical Journal Forum and Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Chem Rec 9: 169–186; 2009: Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ) DOI 10.1002/tcr.200800039     

Three Distinct Redox States of an Oxo‐Bridged Dinuclear Ruthenium Complex

A series of [{(terpy)(bpy)Ru}(μ‐O){Ru(bpy)(terpy)}]ⁿ⁺ ( [RuORu]ⁿ⁺ , terpy=2,2′;6′,2′′‐terpyridine, bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine) was systematically synthesized and characterized in three distinct redox states (n=3, 4, and 5 for Ru^II,III₂ , Ru^III,III₂ , and Ru^III,IV₂ , respectively). The crystal structures of [RuORu]ⁿ⁺ (n=3, 4, 5) in all three redox states were successfully determined. X‐ray crystallography showed that the Ru? O distances and the Ru‐O‐Ru angles are mainly regulated by the oxidation states of the ruthenium centers. X‐ray crystallography and ESR spectra clearly revealed the detailed electronic structures of two mixed‐valence complexes, [Ru^IIIORu^IV]⁵⁺ and [Ru^IIORu^III]³⁺ , in which each unpaired electron is completely delocalized across the oxo‐bridged dinuclear core. These findings allow us to understand the systematic changes in structure and electronic state that accompany the changes in the redox state.     

Preparation, photophysical, and electrochemical properties of two polynuclear Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes containing imidazole-based ligands

A tripodal ligand L¹ and dipodal ligand L² containing imidazole rings have been synthesized by the reaction of 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione with 2,2??-bipyridine-4,4??-dicarbaldehyde and 4-methyl-2,2??-bipyridine-4??-carbaldehyde, respectively, in the presence of ammonium acetate. Both ligands have two kinds of nonequivalent coordinating sites: one involving the phenanthroline moiety and the other involving the 2,2??-bipyridine moiety. The Ru(II) complexes, [(bpy)₆Ru₃(L¹)](PF₆)₆ and [(bpy)₄Ru₂(L²)](PF₆)₄ (bpy?=?2,2??-bipyridine), have been obtained by refluxing Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂·2H₂O with each ligand in solution. The two complexes display MLCT absorptions at 465 and 480?nm, respectively, and emission at 665 and 675?nm, respectively, in CH₃CN solution. Electrochemical studies of both complexes show one Ru(II)-centered oxidation at around 1.29?V and three ligand-centered reductions.     

Synthesis,luminescence, and cyclic voltammetric studies of novel binuclear ruthenium(II) complexes prepared from β-diketonate derivatives

Two bis-(β-diketonate) ligands [H₂L¹ = 3,6-bis-(4,4,4-trifluorobutane-1,3-dione)-9-butyl-carbazole and H₂L² = 3,6-bis-(4,4,4-trifluorobutane-1,3-dione)-9-hexyl-carbazole] were synthesized, and their corresponding dinuclear ruthenium(II) complexes [Ru₂(bpy)₄(L¹)](PF₆)₂ (1) and [Ru₂(bpy)₄(L²)](PF₆)₂ (2) (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine)] were prepared by the reaction of Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂ · 2H₂O with H₂L¹ and H₂L² in ethanol, respectively. The structure of the ligand H₂L² was determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The spectral properties of the ligands and their complexes have been studied. The absorption spectra of the complexes exhibit intense ligand-centered bands in the UV region and metal-to-ligand charge-transfer bands in the visible region. The two-photon absorption (TPA) coefficient β and TPA cross-section σ were determined by the Z-scan technique, which revealed that the two complexes exhibit strong TPA due to electronic extensive delocalization. The complexes undergo a reversible or quasi-reversible one-electron metal-centered redox process at E _1/2 = +0.93 V and E _1/2 = +0.92 V, respectively.     

Synthesis, crystal structures, electrochemical and spectroscopic properties of ruthenium(II) complexes containing diamino-1,3,5-triazine derivatives

Three Ru(II) complexes [Ru(bpy)₂(1-IQTNH)](ClO₄)₂ (1), [Ru(bpy)₂(2-QTNH)](ClO₄)₂ (2) and [Ru(bpy)₂(3-IQTNH)](ClO₄)₂ (3) (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, 1-IQTNH = 6-(isoquinolin-1-yl)-1,3,5-triazine- 2,4-diamine, 2-QTNH = 6-(quinolin-2-yl)-1,3,5-triazine- 2,4-diamine, 3-IQTNH = 6-(isoquinolin-3-yl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine) have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, ¹H NMR spectroscopy, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and X-ray crystallography. The electrochemical and spectroscopic properties of the complexes differ from those of [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ owing to the structural differences between the ligands and their complexes.     

The Tunable Luminescence of Ruthenium(II) Complexes Containing Different Tetrazolate Ligands

Three luminescent mononuclear Ru^II compounds, [Ru^II(bpy)₂( L¹ )](BF₄) ( 1 ), [Ru^II(bpy)₂( L² )](BF₄) ( 2 ), and the neutral compound [Ru^II(bpy)₂( L³ )] ( 3 ), were obtained, by treatment of [Ru^II(bpy)₂Cl₂] with the tetrazolate (tz)-containing ligands L¹ – L³ . All the compounds were well characterized by IR, UV/Vis, and ¹H NMR and their redox properties were also investigated by cyclic voltammogram. The crystal structure of 3 was determined by X-ray crystallography and it clearly shows that the Ru^II ion is octahedrally coordinated by two bpy ligands and a deprotonated L³ ligand. After introduction of these tz ligands, 1 – 3 are more sensitive towards the change of micro-environment of solvents as compared with that of [Ru^II(bpy)₃]²⁺. This effect is most obvious in 3 , since it contains a 2^– ligand L³ . The slight modification of diimine ligand make these complexes have potential applications as sensors.     

Synthesis of a Ruthenium(II) Compound based on 5‐(2‐Pyrimidyl)‐1H‐tetrazole for Photodynamic Therapy

Ru^II compounds have been universally investigated due to their unique physical and chemical properties. In this paper, a new Ru^II compound based on 2,2′‐bipy and Hpmtz [2,2′‐bipy = 2,2′‐bipyridine, Hpmtz = 5‐(2‐pyrimidyl)‐1H‐tetrazole], namely [Ru(2,2′‐bipy)₂(pmtz)][PF₆] · 0.5H₂O was prepared and characterized by elemental analysis, IR and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. [Ru(2,2′‐bipy)₂(pmtz)][PF₆] · 0.5H₂O shows a mononuclear structure and forms a three‐dimensional network by non‐classic hydrogen bonds. The ability of generation of ROS (reactive oxygen species) makes it has a low phototoxicity IC₅₀ (half‐maximal inhibitory concentration) after Xenon lamp irradiation on Hela cells in vitro. The results demonstrate that [Ru(2,2′‐bipy)₂(pmtz)][PF₆] · 0.5H₂O with high light toxicity and low dark toxicity may be a potential candidate for photodynamic therapy.     

5,5′-Bi-5H-cyclopenta[2,1-b;3,4-b′]dipridinylidene,a New Bridging Ligand for Metal Complexes. Preliminary Communication

5,5′-Bi-5H-cyclopenta[2,1-b;3,4-b′]dipyridinylidene( 1 ) was synthesized in three steps from 9,10-phenanthroline and characterized by UV/VIS and NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and cyclic voltammetry. Its ability to act as a bridging ligand is demonstrated by the synthesis of the complexes [Ru(bpy)₂( 1 )](PF₆)₂ ( 6 ) and [{Ru(bpy)₂}₂( 1 )](PF₆)₄ ( 7 ) (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine).     

Near‐IR Absorbing Ruthenium Complexes of Non‐Innocent 6,12‐Di(pyridin‐2‐yl)indolo[3,2‐b]carbazole: Variation as a Function of Co‐Ligands

This article deals with the hitherto unexplored metal complexes of deprotonated 6,12‐di(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐5,11‐dihydroindolo[3,2‐b]carbazole (H₂L). The synthesis and structural, optical, electrochemical characterization of dimeric [{Ru^III(acac)₂}₂(μ‐L^.?)]ClO₄ ([ 1 ]ClO₄, S=1/2), [{Ru^II(bpy)₂}₂(μ‐L^.?)](ClO₄)₃ ([ 2 ](ClO₄)₃, S=1/2), [{Ru^II(pap)₂}₂(μ‐L^2?)](ClO₄)₂ ([ 4 ](ClO₄)₂, S=0), and monomeric [(bpy)₂Ru^II(HL^?)]ClO₄ ([ 3 ]ClO₄, S=0), [(pap)₂Ru^II(HL^?)]ClO₄ ([ 5 ]ClO₄, S=0) (acac=σ‐donating acetylacetonate, bpy=moderately π‐accepting 2,2’‐bipyridine, pap=strongly π‐accepting 2‐phenylazopyridine) are reported. The radical and dianionic states of deprotonated L in isolated dimeric 1 ⁺/ 2 ³⁺ and 4 ²⁺, respectively, could be attributed to the varying electronic features of the ancillary (acac, bpy, and pap) ligands, as was reflected in their redox potentials. Perturbation of the energy level of the deprotonated L or HL upon coordination with {Ru(acac)₂}, {Ru(bpy)₂}, or {Ru(pap)₂} led to the smaller energy gap in the frontier molecular orbitals (FMO), resulting in bathochromically shifted NIR absorption bands (800–2000 nm) in the accessible redox states of the complexes, which varied to some extent as a function of the ancillary ligands. Spectroelectrochemical (UV/Vis/NIR, EPR) studies along with DFT/TD‐DFT calculations revealed (i) involvement of deprotonated L or HL in the oxidation processes owing to its redox non‐innocent potential and (ii) metal (Ru^III/Ru^II) or bpy/pap dominated reduction processes in 1 ⁺ or 2 ²⁺/ 3 ⁺/ 4 ²⁺/ 5 ⁺, respectively.     

Synthesis and characterization of some new mononuclear ruthenium complexes containing 4-(un)substituted dipyridylpyrazole ligands

A mononuclear ruthenium complex [Ru(bpy)₂(bpp)](PF₆) (1) and its halogenated and nitro derivatives [Ru(bpy)₂(Xbpp)](PF₆) (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine; bpp = 3,5-bis(2-pyridyl)pyrazole; X = Cl, 2; X = Br, 3; X = I, 4; X = NO₂, 5) have been synthesized and characterized by ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, HRMS, elemental analysis. Complexes 2–5 have been further confirmed by X-ray diffraction. Their UV–Vis and emission spectroscopies, electrochemical measurements and acid–base properties are described. The results presented here reveal that the introduction of Cl, Br, I and NO₂ groups to the coordinated bpp⁻ ligand makes the absorption and emission maxima of the parent complex 1 blue-shifted, the oxidation potential of the Ru^II/Ru^III couple increased and the pK_a value decreased obviously. In addition, significant quenching of the emission by these groups is also observed.     

A New Heteroleptic Ruthenium(II) Polypyridyl Complex with Long‐Wavelength Absorption and High Singlet‐Oxygen Quantum Yield

Ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes with long‐wavelength absorption and high singlet‐oxygen quantum yield exhibit attractive potential in photodynamic therapy. A new heteroleptic Ru^II polypyridyl complex, [Ru(bpy)(dpb)(dppn)]²⁺ (bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine, dpb=2,3‐bis(2‐pyridyl)benzoquinoxaline, dppn=4,5,9,16‐tetraaza‐dibenzo[a,c]naphthacene), is reported, which exhibits a ¹MLCT (MLCT: metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer) maximum as long as 548 nm and a singlet‐oxygen quantum yield as high as 0.43. Steady/transient absorption/emission spectra indicate that the lowest‐energy MLCT state localizes on the dpb ligand, whereas the high singlet‐oxygen quantum yield results from the relatively long ³MLCT(Ru→dpb) lifetime, which in turn is the result of the equilibrium between nearly isoenergetic excited states of ³MLCT(Ru→dpb) and ³ππ*(dppn). The dppn ligand also ensures a high binding affinity of the complex towards DNA. Thus, the combination of dpb and dppn gives the complex promising photodynamic activity, fully demonstrating the modularity and versatility of heteroleptic Ru^II complexes. In contrast, [Ru(bpy)₂(dpb)]²⁺ shows a long‐wavelength ¹MLCT maximum (551 nm) but a very low singlet‐oxygen quantum yield (0.22), and [Ru(bpy)₂(dppn)]²⁺ shows a high singlet‐oxygen quantum yield (0.79) but a very short wavelength ¹MLCT maximum (442 nm).