New insight into the crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/clay nanocomposites

Crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/clay nanocomposites has been investigated in terms of differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) analysis, polarizing optical microscopy (POM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation. The nanocomposites for investigation were prepared via in situ polycondensation. Crystalline morphologies were observed through POM and SEM. The nonisothermal and isothermal crystallization rates of different samples were determined for comparison based on DSC data. Secondary nucleation analysis was also performed based on bulk crystallization data derived from DSC analysis. The results revealed that nucleating abilities of montmorillonites (MMT) depended on the dispersion state of clay in matrix, the surface modification status, and the metallic derivatives released from MMT during in situ synthesis. The quantities of metallic elements released were measured by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis. The results showed that the release of these metallic derivatives was also affected by surfactant molecules anchored on the surface of MMT. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 46: 2380–2394, 2008     

Isothermal crystallization kinetics and melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/barite nanocomposites

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/Barite nanocomposites were prepared by direct melt compounding. The effects of PET‐Barite interfacial interaction on the dynamic mechanical properties and crystallization were investigated by DMA and DSC. The results showed that Barite can act as a nucleating agent and the nucleation activity can be increased when the Barite was surface‐modified (SABarite). SABarite nanoparticles induced preferential lamellae orientation because of the strong interfacial interaction between PET chains and SABarite nanoparticles, which was not the case in Barite filled PET as determined by WAXD. For PET/Barite nanocomposites, the Avrami exponent n increased with increasing crystallization temperature. Although at the same crystallization temperature, the n value will decrease with increasing SABarite content, indicating of the enhancement of the nucleation activity. Avrami analyses suggest that the nucleation mechanism is different. The activation energy determined from Arrhenius equation reduced dramatically for PET/SABarite nanocomposite, confirming the strong interfacial interaction between PET chains and SABarite nanoparticles can reduce the crystallization free energy barrier for nucleus formation. In the DSC scan after isothermal crystallization process, double melting behavior was found. And the double endotherms could be attributed to the melting of recrystallized less perfect crystallites or the secondary lamellae produced during different crystallization processes. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 47: 655–668, 2009     

Synthesis and non‐isothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate)‐co‐poly(propylene glycol) copolymers

Poly(ethylene terephthalate)‐co‐poly(propylene glycol) (PET‐co‐PPG) copolymers with PPG ratio ranging from 0 to 0.90 mol% were synthesized by the melt copolycondensation. The intrinsic viscosity, structure, non‐isothermal crystallization behavior, nucleation and spherulitic growth of the copolymers were investigated by Ubbelohde viscometer, Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (¹H‐NMR), differential scanning calorimetry, and polarized optical microscopy, respectively. The non‐isothermal crystallization process of the copolymers was analyzed by Avrami, Ozawa, Mo's, Kissinger, and Dobreva methods, respectively. The results showed that the crystallizability of PET was apparently enhanced with incorporating a small amount of PPG, which first rose and then reduced with increasing amount of PPG in the copolymers at a given cooling rate. The crystallization mechanism was a three‐dimensional growth with both instantaneous and sporadic nucleation. Particularly, PET‐co‐PPG containing 0.60 mol% PPG exhibited the highest crystallizability among all the copolymers. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Fast crystallization of poly(ethylene terephthalate)

The crystallization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was studied in the presence of nucleating agents and promoters. The effect of both by themselves and in concert was investigated using differential scanning calorimetry. The aim of this work is to find conditions of fast crystallization of PET. Sodium benzoate(SB) and Surlyn® (S) substantially increase the crystallization rate of PET at higher temperature owing to a reduction in the energy barrier towards primary nucleation, but they accelerate crystallization even more at lower temperature with an additional improvement of the molecular mobility of PET chains. Chain scission of PET caused by the reaction with the nucleating agents was proven by determination of molecular weight. The addition of S alone led to a lower reduction in molecular weight. A series of N-alkyl-p-toluenesulfonamides (ATSAs) were shown to effectively promote molecular motion of the PET chains, leading to an increase in crsytallization rate at lower temperature. A remarkable acceleration of crystallization of PET was attained at lower temperature when S and ATSA were added together. When the content of ATSA is low, S has the dominant influence due to its dual effect of decreasing energy barrier towards nucleation and promoting molecular motion of PET chains. A further increase of crystallization rate of PET was found only after an addition of ATSA of above 5 wt.%.Dedicated to Professor Bernhard Wunderlich on the occasion of his 65th birthdayThis work was supported by State Science and Technology Commission, and partially by National Science Foundation.     

Nonisothermal crystallization behavior of poly(butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate)/clay nano‐biocomposites

The study of the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of layered silicates micro‐ and nano‐biocomposites based on poly(butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate) (PBAT), a biodegradable copolyester, has been carried out with different theoretical models. They were applied and developed with the aim to describe and better understand the influence of the layered silicates dispersion on crystallization. The nucleation efficiency of the layered silicates has been demonstrated with the use of the “Modified Avrami model,” thanks to the higher crystallization rate parameter, Z_c, and of the lower crystallization half‐time, t_1/2, compared to the neat matrix. The crystallization activation energies, E_a, calculated from “Kissinger's model” have shown that layered silicates have a negative effect on the crystallite growth process. Thus, these analyses have shown that layered silicates have a double effect on the crystallization process. These two opposites' phenomena depend on the dispersion quality and are more pronounced for the intercalated nano‐biocomposites. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 45: 1503–1510, 2007     

Synthesis and characterization of poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether endcapped poly(ethylene terephthalate)

Linear and branched poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) copolymers with polyethylene glycol) (PEG) methyl ether (700 or 2000 g/mol) end groups were synthesized using conventional melt polymerization. DSC analysis demonstrated that low levels of PEG end groups accelerated PET crystallization. The incorporated PEG end groups also decreased the crystallization temperature of PET dramatically, and copolymers with a high content of PEG (>17.6 wt%) were able to crystallize at room temperature. Rheological analysis demonstrated that the presence of PEG end groups effectively decreased the melt viscosities and facilitated melt processing. XPS and ATR-FTIR revealed that the PEG end groups tended to aggregate on the surface, and the surface of compression molded films containing 34.0 wt% PEG were PEG rich (85 wt% PEG). PEG end-capped PET (34.0 wt% PEG) and PET films were immersed into a fibrinogen solution (0.7 mg/mL BSA) for 72 h to investigate the propensity for protein adhesion. XPS demonstrated that the concentration of nitrogen (1.05%) on the surface of PEG endcapped PET film was statistically lower than PET (7.67%). SEM analysis was consistent with XPS results, and revealed the presence of adsorbed protein on the surface of PET films.     

New insight into melting and crystallization behavior in semicrystalline poly(ethylene terephthalate)

After isothermal crystallization, poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) showed double endothermic behavior in the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) heating scan. During the heating scans of semicrystalline PET, a metastable melt which comes from melting thinner lamellar crystal populations formed between the low and the upper endothermic temperatures. The metastable melt can recrystallize immediately just above the low melting temperature and form thicker lamellae than the original ones. The thickness and perfection depends on the crystallization time and crystallization temperature. The crystallization kinetics of this metastable melt can be determined by means of DSC. The kinetics analysis showed that the isothermal crystallization of the metastable PET melt proceeds with an Avrami exponent of n = 1.0 ∼ 1.2, probably reflecting one‐dimensional or irregular line growth of the crystal occurring between the existing main lamellae with heterogeneous nucleation. This is in agreement with the hypothesis that the melting peaks are associated with two distinct crystal populations with different thicknesses. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 53–60, 2000     

The effect of annealing on the crystallization of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polycarbonate blends

The effect of annealing on the morphology and subsequent crystallization kinetics of poly (ethylene terephthalate)/polycarbonate blends have been investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), polarized light microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). During annealing transesterification and phase coarsening occurred, and the final properties were compromizes between these two competing effects. Initially, the effect of phase separation dominated and the rate of cold crystallization of PET increased. Transesterification, however, became increasingly important and the rate of crystallization decreased progressively until finally the blend completely lost the ability to crystallize. At this stage in the reaction a single glass transition was observed and uniform glassy material observed in the SEM. The maximum crystallinity of the blend achieved on heating showed the same trend in first increasing and then decreasing with annealing time. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 2129–2136, 2004     

Thermally stable exfoliated poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) nanocomposites as prepared by selective removal of organic modifiers of layered silicate

Exfoliated poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) nanocomposite excluding organic modifier (M-P_etLSN_eom) was successfully prepared by the melt processing via solution method with solvent-nonsolvent system. PET nanocomposites including organic modifier (M-P_etLSN_iom and D-P_etLSN) as counterpart of M-P_etLSN_eom were prepared by using the melt processing via solution method without solvent-nonsolvent system and the only conventional direct melt mixing process, respectively. From elemental analysis (EA) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), organic modifier in M-P_etLSN_eom was confirmed to be well removed by solution method with solvent-nonsolvent system. Then, it was found that M-P_etLSN_eom and M-P_etLSN_iom had exfoliated structure by wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM), whereas no expansion of gallery height was observed for D-P_etLSN. To elucidate the effect of organic modifier on the physical properties of PET nanocomposites, the crystallization behavior, optical transparency, thermal stability, and mechanical properties of M-P_etLSN_eom, M-P_etLSN_iom, D-P_etLSN, and neat PET were evaluated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), UV-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy, TGA, and universal testing machine (UTM). All of the PET nanocomposites exhibited faster crystallization kinetics and better thermal and mechanical properties compared to neat PET due to the presence of silicate layer in PET. However, M-P_etLSN_iom and D-P_etLSN including organic modifier showed lower crystallization constant rates, longer crystallization half times, and poorer optical, thermal, and mechanical properties than M-P_etLSN_eom. These results were ascribed to the thermal decomposition of the organic modifiers presented in M-P_etLSN_iom and D-P_etLSN during the melt processing.     

Melt‐crystallization mechanism of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/multi‐walled carbon nanotubes prepared by in situ polymerization

A series of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/multi‐walled carbon nanotubes (PET/MWCNTs) nanocomposites were prepared by in situ polymerization using different amounts of multi‐walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). The polymerization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was carried out by the two‐stage melt polycondensation method. The intrinsic viscosity (IV) of the composites is ranged between 0.31 and 0.63 dL/g depending on the concentration of the MWCNTs. A decrease of IV was found by increasing MWCNTs content. This is due to the reactions taking place between the two components leading to branched and crosslinked macromolecules. These reactions are, mainly, responsible for thermal behavior of nanocomposites. The melting point of the nanocomposites was shifted to slightly higher temperatures by the addition till 0.55 wt % of MWCNTs while for higher concentration was reduced. The degree of crystallinity in all nanocomposites was, also, reduced by increasing MWCNTs amount. However, from crystallization temperature, it was found that MWCNTs till 1 wt % can enhance the crystallization rate of PET, whereas at higher content (2 wt %), the trend is the opposite due to the formation of crosslinked macromolecules. From the extended crystallization analysis, it was proved that MWCNTs act as nucleating agents for PET crystallization. Additionally, the crystallization mechanism due to the existence of MWCNT becomes more complicated because two mechanisms with different activation energies are taking place in the different degrees of crystallization, depending on the percentage of MWCNT. The effect of molecular weight also plays an important role. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 47: 1452–1466, 2009     

Conformation of the ground-state dimer in poly(ethylene terephthalate)

Absorbance, excitation, and emission measurements have been performed with methyl benzoate and five model compounds, C₆H₅COO (CH₂)_xOOCC₆H₅, x = 2–6. Under appropriate conditions, three of the model compounds (those with x = 3, 4, 5) show evidence for the formation of intramolecular ground-state dimers. The model compound with x = 5 can form two types of dimers which emit with different energies. The model compound with x = 3 forms one of these dimers, and the model compound with x = 4 prefers the other ground-state dimer. Molecular modeling of the dimers suggests that the two conformations of the ground-state dimers differ in the orientation of the two C?O bonds. In the one dimer these two bonds are nearly parallel, but in the other they make an angle of about 120°. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Morphology development and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/phenoxy blend

The morphological development and crystallization behavior of a poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(hydroxyl ether of bisphenol A) (phenoxy) blend were studied with time‐resolved light scattering, optical microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS). During annealing at 280 °C, liquid–liquid phase separation via spinodal decomposition proceeded in the melt‐extruded specimen. After the formation of a domain structure, the blend slowly underwent phase homogenization by the interchange reactions between the two polymers. Specimens annealed for various times (t_s) at 280 °C were subjected to a temperature drop and the effects of liquid‐phase changes on crystallization were then investigated. The shifts in the position of the cold‐crystallization peaks indicated that the crystallization rate is associated with the composition change of the separated phases as well as the change of the sequence distribution in polymer chains during annealing. The morphological parameters at the lamellar level were determined by a correlation function analysis on the SAXS data. The crystal thickness (l_c) increased with t_s, whereas the amorphous layer thickness (l_a) showed little dependence on t_s. Observation of a constant l_a value revealed that a large number of noncrystallizable species formed by the interchange reactions between the two polymers were excluded from the lamellar stacks and resided in the interfibrillar regions, interspherulitic regions, or both. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 46: 223–232, 2008     

Nonisothermal crystallization behavior and crystalline structure of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate)/layered double hydroxide nanocomposites

X‐ray diffraction method and differential scanning calorimetry analysis have been used to investigate the nonisothermal crystallization of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB)/poly(ethylene glycol) phosphonates (PEOPAs)‐modified layered double hydroxide (PMLDH) nanocomposites. Effects of cooling rates and PMLDH contents on the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of PHB were explored. These results show that the addition of 2 wt % PMLDH into PHB caused heterogeneous nucleation increasing the crystallization rate and reducing the activation energy. By adding PMLDH into the PHB probably hinder the transport ability of the molecule chains and result in a decreasing crystallity of PHB, thus increasing the activation energy. The correlation among melting behavior, apparent crystallite size, and paracrystalline distortion of PHB/PMLDH nanocomposites has been also discussed. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 45: 995–1002, 2007     

Nonisothermal cold‐crystallization kinetics of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)

The nonisothermal cold‐crystallization kinetics and subsequent melting behavior of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry. The Avrami, Tobin, and Ozawa equations were applied to describe the kinetics of the crystallization process. Both the Avrami and Tobin crystallization rate parameters increased with the heating rate. The Ozawa crystallization rate increased with the temperature. The ability of PTT to crystallize from the glassy state at a unit heating rate was determined with Ziabicki's kinetic crystallizability index, which was found to be about 0.89. The effective energy barrier describing the nonisothermal cold‐crystallization process of PTT was estimated by the differential isoconversional method of Friedman and was found to range between about 114.5 and 158.8 kJ mol^?1. In its subsequent melting, PTT exhibited double‐melting behavior for heating rates lower than or equal to 10 °C min^?1 and single‐melting behavior for heating rates greater than or equal to 12.5 °C min^?1. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 4151–4163, 2004     

Relaxation behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene naphthalene 2,6‐dicarboxylate) blends prepared by cryogenic blending

A method including cryogenic grinding, melt pressing from the molten state, and quenching was used to prepare blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene naphthalene 2,6‐dicarboxylate) (PEN) in which the two phases were highly dispersed. The effect of melt‐pressing times on the thermal properties and relaxation behavior of PET/PEN films were characterized with differential scanning calorimetry and dielectric spectroscopy. For short melt‐pressing times, two glass‐transition, two crystallization, and two melting peaks were observed, indicating the presence of PET‐rich and PEN‐rich phases in these blends. Longer melt‐pressing times revealed a single glass transition and a single α‐relaxation process, showing that PET–PEN block copolymers were likely to be formed during the melt pressing. The experimental findings were examined in terms of the transesterification reactions between the blend components, as revealed by ¹H NMR measurements. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 40: 2570–2578, 2002     

Lamellar‐level morphology induced by combined crystallization and liquid–liquid demixing in a poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) blend

The lamellar‐level morphology of an extruded poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) (PEN) blend was investigated with small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS). Measurements were made as a function of the annealing time in the melt and the crystallization temperature. The characteristic morphological parameters at the lamellar level were determined by correlation function analysis of the SAXS data. At a low crystallization temperature of 120 °C, the increased amorphous layer thickness was identified in the blend, indicating that some PEN was incorporated into the interlamellar regions of PET during crystallization. The blend also showed a larger lamellar thickness than pure PET. A reason for the increase in the lamellar thickness might be that the formation of thinner lamellar stacks by secondary crystallization was significantly restricted because of the increased glass‐transition temperature. At high crystallization temperatures above 200 °C, the diffusion rates of noncrystallizable components were faster than the growth rates of crystals, with most of the noncrystallizable components escaping from the lamellar stacks. As a result, the blend showed an interfibrillar or interspherulitic morphology. © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 40: 317–324, 2002     

Physical transitions and crystallization phenomena in poly(ethylene terephthalate) studied by microhardness

The crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate) both with and without sodium montanate, a crystal nucleating agent, has been studied using the microhardness technique. The kinetics of crystallization from the glassy state were investigated in real time by measuring the microhardness H at different crystallization temperatures. Results are discussed in terms of the Avrami equation. Values of the Avrami exponent n of about 3 are observed for samples irrespective of nucleating agent. For samples with nucleant two crystallization ranges are observed: a first range which corresponds to a fast crystallization from nucleating agent particles and a second range which is associated with a slow self-crystallization mode. New transitions evidenced by the presence of a small maximum in H as a function of annealing time and temperature are detected at temperatures above T_g for physically aged samples. The kinetics of this transition have also been examined. It is further shown that the presence of nucleating agent induces a hardening at room temperature which is similar to the effect produced by the physical aging of the samples below T_g. Finally, it is found that aging reduces the rate of creep of the material under the indenter. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Heterogeneous nucleation on the crystallization poly(ethylene terephthalate)

The crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) with disodium terephthalate (DST) as nucleating agent was investigated. A detailed analysis of the crystallization course from the melt was made with the Avrami expression. The results demonstrated that DST additive can promote the PET crystallization rate in its entire crystallizable temperature range, and the acceleration degree of DST decreases with increasing temperature after a temperature higher than 180 °C. The values of the Avrami exponent indicated that the crystallization mode in Avrami theory is not suitable for the crystallization of these polymers, and the mechanism of the heterogeneous nucleation on PET crystallization is discussed. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 41: 2135–2144, 2003     

High‐pressure DTA of poly(butylene terephthalate), poly(hexamethylene terephthalate), and poly(ethylene terephthalate)

Pressure effect on the melting behavior of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and poly(hexamethylene terephthalate) (PHT) was studied by high‐pressure DTA (HP‐DTA) up to 320 and 530 MPa, respectively. Cooling rate dependence on the DSC melting curves of the samples cooled from the melt was shown at atmospheric pressure. Stable and metastable samples were prepared by cooling from the melt at low and normal cooling rates, respectively. DTA melting curves for the stable samples showed a single peak, and the peak profile did not change up to high pressure. Phase diagrams for PBT and PHT were newly determined. Fitting curves of melting temperature (T_m) versus pressure expressed by quadratic equation were obtained. Pressure coefficients of T_m at atmospheric pressure, dT_m/dp, of PBT and PHT were 37 and 33 K/100 MPa, respectively. HP‐DTA curves of the metastable PBT showed double melting peaks up to about 70 MPa. In contrast, PHT showed them over the whole pressure region. HP‐DTA of stable poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was also carried out up to 200 MPa, and the phase diagram for PET was determined. dT_m/dp for PET was 49 K/100 MPa. dT_m/dp increased linearly with reciprocal number of ethylene unit. The decrease of dT_m/dp for poly(alkylene terephthalate) with increasing a segmental fraction of an alkyl group in a whole molecule is explained by the increase of entropy of fusion. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 262–272, 2000     

Nonisothermal crystallization behavior of poly(m‐xylene adipamide)/montmorillonite nanocomposites

This article reports the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of MXD6 and its clay nanocomposite system (MXD6/MMT) using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The DSC experimental data were analyzed by theoretical modeling of the crystallization kinetics using the Avrami, Ozawa, Jeziorny, and the combined Avrami–Ozawa semiempirical models. It has been determined that these models adequately described the crystallization behavior of the MXD6 nanocomposite at cooling rates below 20 °C/min, but there was a deviation from linear dependence at higher cooling rates. This was attributed to changes of both the free energy and the cooling crystallization function K(T) over the entire crystallization process, as well as possible relaxation effects leading to structural rearrangements. In addition, the activation energy determined using the differential isoconversional method of Friedman was also found to vary, indicating changes in both the free energy and crystallization mechanism. Despite the lack of a reliable theoretical model, the heterogeneous nucleating activity of the MMT nanoparticles was demonstrated and quantified using Dobreva's method (? = 0.71), and the crystallization rate for the nanocomposite system was found to be greater than pure MXD6 by up to 79% at 40 °C/min. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 47: 1300–1312, 2009