Strukturen von polaren Magnesiumorganylen: Synthese und Struktur von Basen‐Addukten des Magnesiumindenids

An improved X‐ray structure determination of magnesium indenide Mg(C₉H₇)₂ ( 1 ) at low temperature was carried out. Four donor‐acceptor complexes of Mg(C₉H₇)₂ ( 1 ) with O‐ and N‐donor Lewis bases were synthesized and characterized by X‐ray structure analysis. With dioxane and tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA) two simple monomeric complexes, [Mg(C₉H₇)₂(dioxane)₂]·1.5dioxane ( 2a ) and [Mg(C₉H₇)₂(TMEDA)] ( 3 ), were formed. With the O‐donors tetrahydrofuran (THF) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) two ionic magnesium compounds 4 and 5 could be synthesized which have a [MgL₆]²⁺ cation [L = THF and DMSO] and two uncoordinated indenide anions.     

Platinum Complexes of a Borane‐Appended Analogue of 1,1′‐Bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene: Flexible Borane Coordination Modes and in situ Vinylborane Formation

A bis(phosphine)borane ambiphilic ligand, [Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄PPh₂)(η⁵‐C₅H₄PtBu{C₆H₄(BPh₂)‐ortho})] (FcPPB), in which the borane occupies a terminal position, was prepared. Reaction of FcPPB with tris(norbornene)platinum(0) provided [Pt(FcPPB)] ( 1 ) in which the arylborane is η³BCC‐coordinated. Subsequent reaction with CO and CNXyl (Xyl=2,6‐dimethylphenyl) afforded [PtL(FcPPB)] {L=CO ( 2 ) and CNXyl ( 3 )} featuring η²BC‐ and η¹B‐arylborane coordination modes, respectively. Reaction of 1 or 2 with H₂ yielded [PtH(μ‐H)(FcPPB)] in which the borane is bound to a hydride ligand on platinum. Addition of PhC₂H to [Pt(FcPPB)] afforded [Pt(C₂Ph)(μ‐H)(FcPPB)] ( 5 ), which rapidly converted to [Pt(FcPPB′)] ( 6 ; FcPPB′=[Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄PPh₂)(η⁵‐C₅H₄PtBu{C₆H₄(BPh‐CPh=CHPh‐Z)‐ortho}]) in which the newly formed vinylborane is η³BCC‐coordinated. Unlike arylborane complex 1 , vinylborane complex 6 does not react with CO, CNXyl, H₂ or HC₂Ph at room temperature.     

Komplexe der Alkalimetalltetraphenylborate mit makrocyclischen Kronenethern

Complexes of the Alkali Metal Tetraphenylborates with Macrocyclic Crown Ethers Alkali metal tetraphenylborates, MB(C₆H₅)₄ (M = Li to Cs), react in tetrahydrofuran with macrocyclic crown ethers to give complexes of the general formula MB(C₆H₅)₄(crown)_m(THF)_n. Suitable single crystals for X‐ray structure analysis were grown from a solvent mixture of tetrahydrofuran and n‐hexane. The salt like complexes [Li(12‐crown‐4)(thf)][B(C₆H₅)₄] ( 1 ), [Na(15‐crown‐5)(thf)][B(C₆H₅)₄] ( 2 ), and [Cs(18‐crown‐6)₂][B(C₆H₅)₄] · THF ( 6 ), the mononuclear molecular complexes [KB(C₆H₅)₄(18‐crown‐6)(thf)] ( 3 ), [RbB(C₆H₅)₄(18‐crown‐6)] ( 4 ), and [CsB(C₆H₅)₄(18‐crown‐6)] · THF ( 5 ), and the compound [CsB(C₆H₅)₄(18‐crown‐6)]₂[Cs(18‐crown‐6)₂][B(C₆H₅)₄] ( 7 ), which contains a binuclear molecule ([CsB(C₆H₅)₄(18‐crown‐6)]₂) beside a [Cs(18‐crown‐6)₂]⁺ cation and a [B(C₆H₅)₄]^? anion, are described. All compounds are charactarized by infrared spectra, elemental analysis, NMR‐spectroscopy, and X‐ray single crystal structure analysis.     

[η6‐1‐Chloro‐2‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)benzene](η5‐cyclopentadienyl)iron(II) hexafluoridophosphate and (η5‐cyclopentadienyl){2‐[η6‐2‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)phenyl]phenol}iron(II) hexafluoridophosphate

In the complex salt [η⁶‐1‐chloro‐2‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)benzene](η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl)iron(II) hexafluoridophosphate, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₀H₁₂ClN)]PF₆, (I), the complexed cyclopentadienyl and benzene rings are almost parallel, with a dihedral angle between their planes of 2.3 (3)°. In a related complex salt, (η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl){2‐[η⁶‐2‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)phenyl]phenol}iron(II) hexafluoridophosphate, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₆H₁₇NO)]PF₆, (II), the analogous angle is 5.4 (1)°. In both complexes, the aromatic C atom bound to the pyrrolidine N atom is located out of the plane defined by the remaining five ring C atoms. The dihedral angles between the plane of these five ring atoms and a plane defined by the N‐bound aromatic C atom and two neighboring C atoms are 9.7 (8) and 5.6 (2)° for (I) and (II), respectively.     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von η3‐1,2‐Diphosphaallylkomplexen sowie von [{(η5‐C5H5)(CO)2W–Co(CO)3}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe3)2}(μ‐CO)]

Syntheses, Structure and Reactivity of η³‐1,2‐Diphosphaallyl Complexes and [{(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] Reaction of ClP=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂ ( 3 ) with Na[Mo(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] afforded the phosphavinylidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo=P=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 4 ) which in situ was converted into the η¹‐1,2‐diphosphaallyl complex [η⁵‐(C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 6 ) by treatment with the phosphaalkene tBuP=C(NMe₂)₂. The chloroarsanyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₃M–As(Cl)CH(SiMe₃)₂] [where M = Mo ( 9 ); M = W ( 10 )] resulted from the reaction of Na[M(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] (M = Mo, W) with Cl₂AsCH(SiMe₃)₂. The tungsten derivative 10 and Na[Co(CO)₄] underwent reaction to give the dinuclear μ‐arsinidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] ( 11 ). Treatment of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₃)₂}] ( 1 ) with an equimolar amount of ethereal HBF₄ gave rise to a 85/15 mixture of the saline complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η²‐tBu(H)P–P(F)CH(SiMe₃)₂}]BF₄ ( 18 ) and [Cp(CO)₂Mo{F₂PCH(SiMe₃)₂}(tBuPH₂)]BF₄ ( 19 ) by HF‐addition to the PC bond of the η³‐diphosphaallyl ligand and subsequent protonation ( 18 ) and/or scission of the PP bond by the acid ( 19 ). Consistently 19 was the sole product when 1 was allowed to react with an excess of ethereal HBF₄. The products 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 18 and 19 were characterized by means of spectroscopy (IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C{¹H}‐, ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR, MS). Moreover, the molecular structures of 6 , 11 and 18 were determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Aqua(n‐hexyl)[3,3′‐(propane‐1,3‐diyldinitrilo)­bis­(butan‐2‐one) dioximato‐­κ4N]cobalt(III) perchlorate

The title compound, [Co(C₆H₁₃)(C₁₁H₁₉N₄O₂)(H₂O)]ClO₄, is in the general class of coenzyme B₁₂ models which contain a ClO₄ anion and a [Co(C₆H₁₃)(C₁₁H₁₉N₄O₂)(H₂O)]⁺ cation. In the cation, the Co atom has a distorted octahedral coordination, with the n‐hexyl and H₂O ligands in axial positions. The crystal data reveal some degree of flexibility in the Costa‐type system, which is similar to the coenzyme B₁₂.     

Propane‐1,3‐diaminium tetrachloridozincate(II) 18‐crown‐6 clathrate

The reaction of propane‐1,3‐diamine hydrochloride, 18‐crown‐6 and zinc(II) chloride in methanol solution yields the title complex salt [systematic name: propane‐1,3‐diaminium tetrachloridozincate(II)–1,4,7,10,13,16‐hexaoxacyclooctadecane (1/1)], (C₃H₁₂N₂)[ZnCl₄]·C₁₂H₂₄O₆, with an unusual supramolecular structure. The diprotonated propane‐1,3‐diaminium cation forms an unexpected 1:1 supramolecular rotator–stator complex with the crown ether, viz. [C₃H₁₂N₂(18‐crown‐6)]²⁺, in which one of the –NH₃⁺ substituents nests in the crown and interacts through N—H...O hydrogen bonding. The other –NH₃⁺ group interacts with the [ZnCl₄]²⁻ anion via N—H...Cl hydrogen bonding, forming cation–crown–anion ribbons parallel to [010].     

Photochemische Reaktionen von Cyclopentadienylbis(ethen)rhodium mit Benzolderivaten

Photochemical Reactions of Cyclopentadienylbis(ethene)rhodium with Benzene Derivatives During UV irradiation of [CpRh(C₂H₄)₂] ( 1 ) (Cp = η⁵‐C₅H₅) in hexane in the presence of hexamethylbenzene the di‐ and trinuclear arene bridged complexes [(CpRh)₂(μ‐η³ : η³‐C₆Me₆)] ( 3 ) and [(CpRh)₃(μ₃‐η² : η² : η²‐C₆Me₆)] ( 4 ) are formed besides known [CpRh(η⁴‐C₆Me₆)] ( 2 ). It was shown by a separate experiment that 3 besides small amounts of 4 is formed by attack of photochemically from 1 arising CpRh fragments at the free double bond of the η⁴‐bonded benzene ring in 2 . Irradiation of 1 in the presence of diphenyl (C₁₂H₁₀) affords the compounds [(CpRh)₂(μ‐η³ : η³‐C₁₂H₁₀)] ( 5 ) and [(CpRh)₃(μ₃‐η² : η² : η²‐C₁₂H₁₀)] ( 6 ) as analogues of 3 and 4 , in the presence of triptycene (C₂₀H₁₄) only [(CpRh)₂(μ‐η³ : η³‐C₂₀H₁₄)] ( 7 ) is obtained; the bridging in 5 , 6 , and 7 always occurs via the same six‐membered ring of the corresponding ligand system. During the photochemical reaction of 1 in the presence of styrene (C₈H₈) substitution of the ethene ligands by the vinyl groups with formation of [CpRh(C₂H₄)(η²‐C₈H₈)] ( 8 ) and known [CpRh(η²‐C₈H₈)₂] ( 9 ) is observed exclusively. The new complexes were characterized analytically and spectroscopically, in the case of 3 also by X‐ray structure analysis.     

Selective,Cytotoxic Organoruthenium(II) Full‐Sandwich Complexes: A Structural,Computational and In Vitro Biological Study

A structurally diverse range of lipophilic, cationic η⁶‐arene η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl (η⁵‐Cp*) full‐sandwich complexes of ruthenium(II) have been prepared and structurally characterized by Fourier‐transform IR and NMR spectroscopy, electrospray mass spectrometry, and elemental microanalyses. Computational experiments incorporating the Hartree–Fock theory and the second‐order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory predict each complex to possess a uniform δ+ electrostatic potential, with the cationic charge of the [RuCp*]⁺ moiety completely delocalizing throughout the molecular structure of each metallocene. In vitro cytotoxicity studies demonstrate these delocalized lipophilic cations to be potent growth inhibitors of eleven unique tumorigenic cell lines, while exhibiting significantly lower levels of toxicity towards both a normal human fibroblast and a mouse macrophage cell line. Single‐crystal X‐ray structural determinations are additionally reported for five complexes, [Ru(η⁶‐C₆H₅(CH₂)₂CH₃)(η⁵‐C₅(CH₃)₅)]BPh₄, [Ru(η⁶‐C₆H₅CO₂CH₂CH₃)(η⁵‐C₅(CH₃)₅)]BF₄, [Ru(η⁶‐C₁₀H₈)(η⁵‐C₅(CH₃)₅)]BPh₄, [Ru(η⁶‐C₁₄H₁₀)(η⁵‐C₅(CH₃)₅)]BPh₄, and [Ru(η⁶‐C₁₆H₁₀)(η⁵‐C₅(CH₃)₅)]BPh₄.     

Ethyl and isopropyl 4‐ferrocenylbenzoate

The title compounds, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₄H₁₃O₂)] and [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₅H₁₅O₂)], respectively, contain the ferrocenyl η⁵(C₅H₄) and phenyl­ene –C₆H₄– rings in a nearly coplanar arrangement, with interplanar angles of 6.88 (12) and 10.5 (2)°, respectively. Molecules of the ethyl ester form dimers through η⁵(C₅H₅)C—H⋯O=C hydrogen bonds, with graph set R(20), and, together with Csp³—H⋯π(C₅H₅) interactions, generate a one‐dimensional column (irregular ladder). Molecules of the iso­propyl ester aggregate through η⁵(C₅H₅)C—H⋯π(C₆H₄) interactions.     

[{Cp2(tBuSe)Nb}2E] (E = O and Se) with bridging oxide or selenide ligands

The title compounds, μ‐oxido‐bis[(tert‐butylselenolato)bis(η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl)niobium(IV)] toluene solvate, [Nb₂(C₅H₅)₄(C₄H₉Se)₂O]·C₇H₈, and μ‐selenido‐bis[(tert‐butylselenolato)bis(η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl)niobium(IV)], [Nb₂(C₅H₅)₄(C₄H₉Se)₂Se], consist of niobium(IV) centres each bonded to two η⁵‐coordinated cyclopentadienyl groups and one tert‐butylselenolate ligand and are the first organometallic niobium selenolates to be structurally characterized. A bridging oxide or selenide completes the niobium coordination spheres of the discrete dinuclear molecules. In the oxide, the O atom lies on an inversion centre, resulting in a linear Nb—O—Nb linkage, whereas the selenide has a bent bridging group [Nb—Se—Nb = 139.76 (2)°]. The difference is attributable to strong π bonding in the oxide case, although the effects on the Nb—C and Nb—Se^tBu bond lengths are small.     

Insertions‐ und Substitutionsreaktion von Ameisensäuremethylester mit [Cp′2ZrCl(PHTipp)] – Molekülstruktur von meso‐trans‐[Cp′2ZrCl{OCH(PHTipp)2}] (Cp′ = η5‐C5MeH4, Tipp = 2,4,6‐Pri3C6H2)

Insertion and Substitution Reaction of Methyl Formate with [Cp′₂ZrCl(PHTipp)] – Molecular Structure of meso‐trans ‐[Cp′₂ZrCl{OCH(PHTipp)₂}] (Cp′ = η⁵‐C₅MeH₄, Tipp = 2,4,6‐Prⁱ₃C₆H₂) [Cp′₂ZrCl(PHTipp)] ( 1 ) (Cp′ = η⁵‐C₅MeH₄, Tipp = 2,4,6‐Prⁱ₃C₆H₂) reacts with methyl formate with insertion and substitution to give [Cp′₂ZrCl{OCH(PHTipp)₂}] ( 2 ). 2 was characterized spectroscopically (¹H, ³¹P NMR, IR, MS) and by X‐ray structure determination. Only the meso‐trans isomer is present in the solid state.     

Structural Analysis of Zincocenes with Substituted Cyclopentadienyl Rings

New zincocenes [ZnCp′₂] ( 2 – 5 ) with substituted cyclopentadienyl ligands C₅Me₄H, C₅Me₄tBu, C₅Me₄SiMe₂tBu and C₅Me₄SiMe₃, respectively, have been prepared by the reaction of ZnCl₂ with the appropriate Cp′‐transfer reagent. For a comparative structural study, the known [Zn(C₅H₄SiMe₃)₂] ( 1 ), has also been investigated, along with the mixed‐ring zincocenes [Zn(C₅Me₅)(C₅Me₄SiMe₃)] ( 6 ) and [Zn(C₅Me₅)(C₅H₄SiMe₃)] ( 7 ), the last two obtained by conproportionation of [Zn(C₅Me₅)₂] with 5 or 1 , as appropriate. All new compounds were characterised by NMR spectroscopy, and by X‐ray methods, with the exception of 7 , which yields a side‐product ( C ) upon attempted crystallisation. Compounds 5 and 6 were also investigated by ¹³C CPMAS NMR spectroscopy. Zincocenes 1 and 2 have infinite chain structures with bridging Cp′ ligands, while 3 and 4 exhibit slipped‐sandwich geometries. Compounds 5 and 6 have rigid, η⁵/η¹(σ) structures, in which the monohapto C₅Me₄SiMe₃ ligand is bound to zinc through the silyl‐bearing carbon atom, forming a Zn? C bond of comparable strength to the Zn? Me bond in ZnMe₂. Zincocene 5 has dynamic behaviour in solution, but a rigid η⁵/η¹(σ) structure in the solid state, as revealed by ¹³C CPMAS NMR studies, whereas for 6 the different nature of the Cp′ ligands and of the ring substituents of the η¹‐Cp′ group (Me and SiMe₃) have permitted observation for the first time of the rigid η⁵/η¹ solution structure. Iminoacyl compounds of composition [Zn(η⁵‐C₅Me₄R)(η¹‐C(NXyl)C₅Me₄R)] resulting from the reactions of some of the above zincocenes and CNXyl (Xyl=2,6‐dimethylphenylisocyanide) have also been obtained and characterised.     

Bis(η5‐isopropyltetramethylcyclo­pentadienyl)(tetrahydroborato‐κ3H,H′,H′′)(tetrahydrofuran‐O)‐samarium(III): a lanthanidocene complex with a tridentate tetrahydroborato ligand

The lanthanidocene complex [Sm(BH₄)(C₁₂H₁₉)₂(C₄H₈O)], (I), shows a distorted tetrahedral arrangement around the central Sm^III atom. It consists of two η⁵‐isopropyltetramethylcyclopentadienyl ligands, one tetrahydroborato (BH₄^?) ligand bridging via H atoms to the lanthanide atom and one coordinating tetrahydrofuran (thf) molecule. The BH₄^? unit of (I) coordinates as a tridentate ligand with three bridging H atoms and one terminal H atom [Sm—B—H4 176 (2)°]. The η⁵‐isopropyl­tetra­methylcyclopentadienyl ligands of this bent‐sandwich complex [Cp1—Sm—Cp2 133.53 (1)° where Cp denotes the centroid of the cyclopentadienyl ring] adopt staggered conformations.     

Scandium complexes with the tetraphenylethylene and anthracene dianions

The structural study of Sc complexes containing dianions of anthracene and tetraphenylethylene should shed some light on the nature of rare‐earth metal–carbon bonding. The crystal structures of (18‐crown‐6)bis(tetrahydrofuran‐κO)sodium bis(η⁶‐1,1,2,2‐tetraphenylethenediyl)scandium(III) tetrahydrofuran disolvate, [Na(C₄H₈O)₂(C₁₂H₂₄O₆)][Sc(C₂₆H₂₀)₂]·2C₄H₈O or [Na(18‐crown‐6)(THF)₂][Sc(η⁶‐C₂Ph₄)₂]·2(THF), ( 1b ), (η⁵‐1,3‐diphenylcyclopentadienyl)(tetrahydrofuran‐κO)(η⁶‐1,1,2,2‐tetraphenylethenediyl)scandium(III) toluene hemisolvate, [Sc(C₁₇H₁₃)(C₂₆H₂₀)(C₄H₈O)]·0.5C₇H₈ or [(η⁵‐1,3‐Ph₂C₅H₃)Sc(η⁶‐C₂Ph₄)(THF)]·0.5(toluene), ( 5b ), poly[[(μ₂‐η³:η³‐anthracenediyl)bis(η⁶‐anthracenediyl)bis(η⁵‐1,3‐diphenylcyclopentadienyl)tetrakis(tetrahydrofuran)dipotassiumdiscandium(III)] tetrahydrofuran monosolvate], {[K₂Sc₂(C₁₄H₁₀)₃(C₁₇H₁₃)₂(C₄H₈O)₄]·C₄H₈O}_n or [K(THF)₂]₂[(1,3‐Ph₂C₅H₃)₂Sc₂(C₁₄H₁₀)₃]·THF, ( 6 ), and 1,4‐diphenylcyclopenta‐1,3‐diene, C₁₇H₁₄, ( 3a ), have been established. The [Sc(η⁶‐C₂Ph₄)₂]⁻ complex anion in ( 1b ) contains the tetraphenylethylene dianion in a symmetrical bis‐η³‐allyl coordination mode. The complex homoleptic [Sc(η⁶‐C₂Ph₄)₂]⁻ anion retains its structure in THF solution, displaying hindered rotation of the coordinated phenyl rings. The 1D ¹H and ¹³C{¹H}, and 2D COSY ¹H–¹H and ¹³C–¹H NMR data are presented for M[Sc(Ph₄C₂)₂]·xTHF [M = Na and x = 4 for ( 1a ); M = K and x = 3.5 for ( 2a )] in THF‐d₈ media. Complex ( 5b ) exhibits an unsymmetrical bis‐η³‐allyl coordination mode of the dianion, but this changes to a η⁴ coordination mode for (1,3‐Ph₂C₅H₃)Sc(Ph₄C₂)(THF)₂, ( 5a ), in THF‐d₈ solution. A ⁴⁵Sc NMR study of ( 2a ) and UV–Vis studies of ( 1a ), ( 2a ) and ( 5a ) indicate a significant covalent contribution to the Sc—Ph₄C₂ bond character. The unique Sc ate complex, ( 6 ), contains three anthracenide dianions demonstrating both a η⁶‐coordination mode for two bent ligands and a μ₂‐η³:η³‐bridging mode of a flat ligand. Each [(1,3‐Ph₂C₅H₃)₂Sc₂(C₁₄H₁₀)₃]²⁻ dianionic unit is connected to four neighbouring units via short contacts with [K(THF)₂]⁺ cations, forming a two‐dimensional coordination polymer framework parallel to (001).     

4‐Carboxypyridinium perchlorate 18‐crown‐6 dihydrate clathrate and 4‐carboxypyridinium tetrafluoroborate 18‐crown‐6 dihydrate clathrate

Mixtures of 4‐carboxypyridinium perchlorate or 4‐carboxypyridinium tetrafluoroborate and 18‐crown‐6 (1,4,7,10,13,16‐hexaoxacyclooctadecane) in ethanol and water solution yielded the title supramolecular salts, C₆H₆NO₂⁺·ClO₄⁻·C₁₂H₂₄O₆·2H₂O and C₆H₆NO₂⁺·BF₄⁻·C₁₂H₂₄O₆·2H₂O. Based on their similar crystal symmetries, unit cells and supramolecular assemblies, the salts are essentially isostructural. The asymmetric unit in each structure includes one protonated isonicotinic acid cation and one crown ether molecule, which together give a [(C₆H₆NO₂)(18‐crown‐6)]⁺ supramolecular cation. N—H...O hydrogen bonds between the protonated N atoms and a single O atom of each crown ether result in the 4‐carboxypyridinium cations `perching' on the 18‐crown‐6 molecules. Further hydrogen‐bonding interactions involving the supramolecular cation and both water molecules form a one‐dimensional zigzag chain that propagates along the crystallographic c direction. O—H...O or O—H...F hydrogen bonds between one of the water molecules and the anions fix the anion positions as pendant upon this chain, without further increasing the dimensionality of the supramolecular network.     

[(8a,9,9a‐η)‐9‐(η5‐Cyclopentadienyl)‐9‐nickelafluorenyl](η5‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)nickel(II)

The title compound, [Ni₂(C₅H₅)(C₁₀H₁₅)(C₁₂H₈)] or [Ni(C₁₀H₁₅){Ni(C₅H₅)(C₁₂H₈)}], is a rare example (and the first obtained from nickelafluorenyllithium) of an analogue of nickelocene in which the central Ni atom is coordinated to one pentamethylcyclopentadienyl ring and one nickelafluorenyl ring. Both rings lie almost parallel to one another: the dihedral angle between the planes which include these rings is 4.4 (1)°. Slip parameter analysis indicates that the bonding mode of the central Ni atom to the nickelacyclic ring is between η³ and η⁵. Two‐dimensional layers of molecules are formed by C—H...π interactions.     

The first example of a two‐coordinated AuI atom bonded to an FeII atom and an N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligand

The aurophilicity exhibited by Au^I complexes depends strongly on the nature of the supporting ligands present and the length of the Au–element (Au—E) bond may be used as a measure of the donor–acceptor properties of the coordinated ligands. A binuclear iron–gold complex, [1,3‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)imidazol‐2‐ylidene‐2κC²]dicarbonyl‐1κ²C‐(1η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl)gold(I)iron(II)(Au—Fe) benzene trisolvate, [AuFe(C₅H₅)(C₂₇H₃₆N₂)(CO)₂]·3C₆H₆, was prepared by reaction of K[CpFe(CO)₂] (Cp is cyclopentadienyl) with (NHC)AuCl [NHC = 1,3‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)imidazol‐2‐ylidene]. In addition to the binuclear complex, the asymmetric unit contains three benzene solvent molecules. This is the first example of a two‐coordinated Au atom bonded to an Fe and a C atom of an N‐heterocyclic carbene.     

Group 2 metal salts of pyromellitic acid: [Mg(H2O)6](C10H4O8) and [Ba(C10H4O8)(H2O)5]

Structural determinations of the magnesium(II) and barium(II) salts of pyromellitic acid (benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetra­carboxyl­ic acid) are presented. Hexa­aqua­magnesium(II) benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetra­carboxyl­ate(2−), [Mg(H₂O)₆](C₁₀H₄O₈), (I), and penta­aqua­[benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetra­carboxyl­ato(2−)]­barium(II), [Ba(C₁₀H₄O₈)(H₂O)₅], (II), are both centrosymmetric and both possess a 1:1 metal–ligand ratio, but the two structures are found to differ in that the magnesium salt contains a hexaaqua cation and possesses only hydrogen‐bonding interactions between cations and anions, while the barium salt exhibits coordination of the carboxyl­ate ligand to the nine‐coordinate metal centre. In (I), both ions sit on a 2/m site symmetry, and in (II), the cation and anion are located on m and i site symmetries, respectively.     

Synthese,Struktur und Photochemie von Olefiniridium(I)‐Komplexen mit Acetylacetonatoliganden

Synthesis, Structure, and Photochemical Behavior of Olefine Iridium(I) Complexes with Acetylacetonato Ligands The bis(ethene) complex [Ir(κ²‐acac)(C₂H₄)₂] ( 1 ) reacts with tertiary phosphanes to give the monosubstitution products [Ir(κ²‐acac)(C₂H₄)(PR₃)] ( 2 – 5 ). While 2 (R = iPr) is inert toward PiPr₃, the reaction of 2 with diphenylacetylene affords the π‐alkyne complex [Ir(κ²‐acac)(C₂Ph₂)(PiPr₃)] ( 6 ). Treatment of [IrCl(C₂H₄)₄] with C‐functionalized acetylacetonates yields the compounds [Ir(κ²‐acacR^1,2)(C₂H₄)₂] ( 8 , 9 ), which react with PiPr₃ to give [Ir(κ²‐acacR^1,2)(C₂H₄)(PiPr₃)] ( 10 , 11 ) by displacement of one ethene ligand. UV irradiation of 5 (PR₃ = iPr₂PCH₂CO₂Me) and 11 (R² = (CH₂)₃CO₂Me) leads, after addition of PiPr₃, to the formation of the hydrido(vinyl)iridium(III) complexes 7 and 12 . The reaction of 2 with the ethene derivatives CH₂=CHR (R = CN, OC(O)Me, C(O)Me) affords the compounds [Ir(κ²‐acac)(CH₂=CHR)(PiPr₃)] ( 13 – 15 ), which on photolysis in the presence of PiPr₃ also undergo an intramolecular C–H activation. In contrast, the analogous complexes [Ir(κ²‐acac)(olefin)(PiPr₃)] (olefin = (E)‐C₂H₂(CO₂Me)₂ 16 , (Z)‐C₂H₂(CO₂Me)₂ 17 ) are photochemically inert.