Ligand‐Controlled Formation of a Low‐Valent Pincer Rhodium(I)–Dioxygen Adduct Bearing a Very Short O?O Bond

Treatment of [{Me₂C₆H(CH₂P^tBu₂)₂}Rh(η¹‐N₂)] ( 1a ) with molecular oxygen (O₂) resulted in almost quantitative formation of the dioxygen adduct [{Me₂C₆H(CH₂P^tBu₂)₂}Rh(η²‐O₂)] ( 2a ). An X‐ray diffraction study of 2a revealed the shortest O? O bond reported for Rh? O₂ complexes, indicating the formation of a Rh^I? O₂ adduct, rather than a cyclic Rh^III η²‐peroxo complex. The coordination of the O₂ ligand in 2a was shown to be reversible. Treatment of 2a with CO gas yielded almost quantitatively the corresponding carbonyl complex [{Me₂C₆H(CH₂P^tBu₂)₂}Rh(CO)] ( 3a ). Surprisingly, treatment of the structurally very similar pincer complex [{C₆H₃(CH₂PⁱPr₂)₂)}Rh(η¹‐N₂)] ( 1b ) with O₂ led to partial decomposition, with no dioxygen adduct being observed.     

Cerium‐Complex‐Catalyzed Oxidation of Arylmethanols under Atmospheric Pressure of Dioxygen and Its Mechanism through a Side‐On μ‐Peroxo Dicerium(IV) Complex

A new Ce^IV complex [Ce{NH(CH₂CH₂N=CHC₆H₂‐3,5‐(tBu)₂‐2‐O)₂}(NO₃)₂] ( 1 ), bearing a dianionic pentadentate ligand with an N₃O₂ donor set, has been prepared by treating (NH₄)₂Ce(NO₃)₆ with the sodium salt of ligand L1 . Complex 1 in the presence of TEMPO and 4 Å molecular sieves (MS4 A) has been found to serve as a catalyst for the oxidation of arylmethanols using dioxygen as an oxidant. We propose an oxidation mechanism based on the isolation and reactivity study of a trivalent cerium complex [Ce{NH(CH₂CH₂N=CHC₆H₂‐3,5‐(tBu)₂‐2‐O)₂}(NO₃)(THF)] ( 2 ), its side‐on μ‐O₂ adduct [Ce{NH(CH₂CH₂N=CHC₆H₂‐3,5‐(tBu)₂‐2‐O)₂}(NO₃)]₂(μ‐η²:η²‐O₂) ( 3 ), and the hydroxo‐bridged Ce^IV complex [Ce{NH(CH₂CH₂N=CHC₆H₂‐3,5‐(tBu)₂‐2‐O)₂}(NO₃)]₂(μ‐OH)₂ ( 4 ) as key intermediates during the catalytic cycle. Complex 2 was synthesized by reduction of 1 with 2,5‐dimethyl‐1,4‐bis(trimethylsilyl)‐1,4‐diazacyclohexadiene. Bubbling O₂ into a solution of 2 resulted in formation of the peroxo complex 3 . This provides the first direct evidence for cerium‐catalyzed oxidation of alcohols under an O₂ atmosphere.     

Effective Encapsulation of Europium(3+) by a Heptadentate Schiff‐Base Ligand

The bright yellow Schiff‐base complex Eu(TRENDSAL) ( 1 ) (TRENDSAL = N[CH₂CH₂N=CH(2‐OH‐3,5‐tBu₂C₆H₂)]₃) was prepared in 71 % yield by treatment of EuCl₃·6H₂O simultaneously with 3,5‐di‐tert‐butylsalicylicaldehyde and tris(2‐aminoethyl)amine in the presence of triethylamine. X‐ray crystal structure analyses of the solvates 1 ·DME (DME = 1,2‐dimethoxyethane) and 1 ·MeCN demonstrated the tight encapsulation of the Eu³⁺ ion, allowing not even the “slim” acetonitrile to enter the coordination sphere of europium.     

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) synthesis catalysed by chelated Sn,Zn and Mg complexes

A series of four C,N‐chelated diorganotin(IV) compounds, namely (L^CN)₂Sn(OCH₂CH₂O) ( 1 ), [L^CNBuSn(OCH₂CH₂O)]₂ ( 2 ), (L^CN)₂Sn(1,2‐(O)₂‐3,5‐tBu₂C₆H₂) ( 3 ) and [L^CNBuSn(1,2‐(O)₂‐3,5‐tBu₂C₆H₂)]₂ ( 4 ) (L^CN = 2‐(Me₂NCH₂)C₆H₄), one zinc species, namely L^NOZnEt ( 5 ) (L^NO = [2‐(MeO)C₆H₄]NC(Me)?C(H)C(Me)?O), and one magnesium complex, namely [L^NNMg]₆ ( 6 ), (L^NN = [2‐(Me₂NCH₂)C₆H₄]N), were used as catalysts for the synthesis of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) from dimethyl terephthalate and ethylene glycol. Prepared PET samples were primarily characterized using the size exclusion chromatography technique. The highest number‐average molar mass of prepared PET samples reached 10.7 kg mol^?1. Novel dimeric compound 2 was structurally characterized using both multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and X‐ray diffraction analysis. In addition, an alternative synthesis of 1 is described. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Formation and Reactivity of an Aluminabenzene Ligand at Pentadienyl‐Supported Rare‐Earth Metals

The half‐open rare‐earth‐metal aluminabenzene complexes [(1‐Me‐3,5‐tBu₂‐C₅H₃Al)(μ‐Me)Ln(2,4‐dtbp)] (Ln=Y, Lu) are accessible via a salt metathesis reaction employing Ln(AlMe₄)₃ and K(2,4‐dtbp). Treatment of the yttrium complex with B(C₆F₅)₃ and tBuCCH gives access to the pentafluorophenylalane complex [{1‐(C₆F₅)‐3,5‐tBu₂‐C₅H₃Al}{μ‐C₆F₅}Y{2,4‐dtbp}] and the mixed vinyl acetylide complex [(2,4‐dtbp)Y(μ‐η¹:η³‐2,4‐tBu₂‐C₅H₄)(μ‐CCtBu)AlMe₂], respectively.     

Reaktionen von tBu2P–P=P(Me)tBu2 mit (Et3P)2NiCl2 und [{η2‐C2H4}Ni(PEt3)2]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XXIII. Reactions of ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ with (Et₃P)₂NiCl₂ and [{η²‐C₂H₄}Ni(PEt₃)₂] ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ ( 1 ) forms with (Et₃P)₂NiCl₂ ( 2 ) and Na(Nph) the [μ‐(1,3 : 2,3‐η‐^tBu₂P₄^tBu₂){Ni(PEt₃)Cl}₂] ( 3 ) as main product. Using Na/Hg instead as reducing agent the Ni⁰ compounds [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Ni(PEt₃)₂] ( 4 ), [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P=P–P^tBu₂}Ni(PEt₃)₂] ( 5 ) and [(Et₃P)Ni(μ‐P^tBu₂)]₂ ( 6 ) with four‐membered Ni₂P₂ ring result. [{η²‐C₂H₄}Ni(PEt₃)₂] yields with 1 also 4 . The compounds were characterized by ¹H and ³¹P{¹H} NMR investigations and 3 also by a single crystal X‐ray analysis. It crystallizes triclinic in the space group P 1 with a = 1129.4(2), b = 1256.8(3), c = 1569.5(3) pm, α = 72.44(3)°, β = 70.52(3)° and γ = 74.20(3)°.     

Nitric Oxide Insertion Reactivity with the Bismuth–Carbon Bond: Formation of the Oximate Anion, [ON(C6H2tBu2O)]−, from the Oxyaryl Dianion, (C6H2tBu2O)2−

The first example of NO insertion into a Bi?C bond has been found in the direct reaction of NO with a Bi³⁺ complex of the unusual (C₆H₂tBu₂‐3,5‐O‐4)^2? oxyaryl dianionic ligand, namely, Ar′Bi(C₆H₂tBu₂‐3,5‐O‐4) [Ar′=2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃] ( 1 ). The oximate complexes [Ar′Bi(ONC₆H₂‐3,5‐tBu₂‐4‐O)]₂(μ‐O) ( 3 ) and Ar′Bi(ONC₆H₂‐3,5‐tBu₂‐4‐O)₂ ( 4 ) were formed as a mixture, but can be isolated in pure form by reaction of NO with a Bi³⁺ complex of the [O₂C(C₆H₂tBu₂‐3‐5‐O‐4]^2? oxyarylcarboxy dianion, namely, Ar′Bi[O₂C(C₆H₂tBu₂‐3‐5‐O‐4)‐κ²O,O’]. Reaction of 1 with Ph₃CSNO gave an oximate product with (Ph₃CS)^1? as an ancillary ligand, (Ph₃CS)(Ar′)Bi(ONC₆H₂‐3,5‐tBu₂‐4‐O) ( 5 ).     

Synthetic and Structural Studies on the Cyclic Bis(amino)stannylenes Sn[(NR)2C10H6‐1, 8] and their Reactions with SnCl2 or Si[(NCH2But)2C6H4‐1, 2] (R = SiMe3 or CH2But)

Treatment of {HNR}₂C₁₀H₆‐1, 8 [R = SiMe₃ ( 1 ), CH₂Bu^t ( 2 )] with Sn[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ afforded the cyclic stannylene Sn[{NR}₂C₁₀H₆‐1, 8] [R = SiMe₃ ( 3 ), CH₂Bu^t ( 4 )]. From 3 and SnCl₂ in THF and crystallisation from toluene, the product was the crystalline tetracyclic compound ( 5 ) as the (toluene)_0.5‐solvate. Reaction of 4 with the silylene Si[(NCH₂Bu^t)₂C₆H₄‐1, 2] ( 6 ) [abbreviated as Si(NN)] in benzene and crystallisation in presence of Et₂O furnished the crystalline tricyclic complex Sn[{Si(NCH₂Bu^t)₂C₆H₄‐1′, 2′}₂‐{(NCH₂Bu^t)₂C₁₀H₆‐1, 8}] ( 7 ) as the Et₂O‐solvate. Complex 5 slowly dissociated into its factors 3 and SnCl₂ in toluene, but rapidly in THF. Solutions of 7 in C₆D₆, C₇D₈ or THF‐d₈, studied by multinuclear, variable temperature NMR spectroscopy, revealed the presence of an equilibrium between 8 (an isomer of 7 , in which the skeletal atoms of the eight‐membered ring were , rather than the of 7 ) and 4 + 2 Si(NN), with 8 dominant in PhMe but not in THF; additionally 8 was shown to be fluxional and solutions of 8 in C₆D₆ or C₇D₈ decomposed to give the silane Si(NN)[(NCH₂Bu^t)₂C₁₀H₆‐1, 8], 6 and Sn metal. The X‐ray structures of 3 , 5 and 7 are presented.     

Intramolecularly Coordinated Gallium Sulfides: Suitable Single Source Precursors for GaS Thin Films

Our studies have been focused on the synthesis of N→Ga coordinated organogallium sulfides [L¹Ga(μ‐S)]₃ ( 1 ) and [L²Ga(μ‐S)]₂ ( 2 ) containing either N,C,N‐ or C,N‐chelating ligands L¹ or L² (L¹ is {2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃}^? and L² is {2‐(Et₂NCH₂)‐4,6‐tBu₂‐C₆H₂}^?). As the result of the different ligands, compounds 1 and 2 differ mutually in their structure. To change the Ga/S ratio, unusually N→Ga coordinated organogallium tetrasulfide L¹Ga(κ²‐S₄) ( 3 ) was prepared and the unprecedented complex [{2‐[CH{(CH₂)₃CH₃}(μ‐OH)]‐6‐CH₂NMe₂}C₆H₃]GaS ( 4 ) was also isolated as the minor by‐product of the reaction. Compounds 1 – 3 were further studied as potential single‐source precursors for amorphous GaS thin film deposition by spin‐coating.     

Polypropylene and poly(ethylene‐co‐1‐octene) effective synthesis with diamine‐bis(phenolate) complexes: Effect of complex structure on catalyst activity and product microstructure

A series of group 4 metal complexes bearing amine‐bis(phenolate) ligands with the amino side‐arm donor: (μ‐O)[Me₂N(CH₂)₂N(CH₂‐2‐O‐3,5‐tBu₂‐C₆H₂)₂ZrCl]₂ ( 1a ), R₂N(CH₂)₂N(CH₂‐2‐O‐3‐R¹‐5‐R²‐C₆H₂)₂TiCl₂ (R = Me, R¹, R² = tBu ( 2a ), R = iPr, R¹, R² = tBu ( 2b ), R = iPr, R¹ = tBu, R² = OMe ( 2c )), and Me₂N(CH₂)₂N(CH₂‐2‐O‐3,5‐tBu₂‐C₆H₂)(CH₂‐2‐O‐C₆H₄)TiCl₂ ( 2d ) are used in ethylene and propylene homopolymerization, and ethylene/1‐octene copolymerization. All complexes, upon their activation with Al(iBu)₃/Ph₃CB(C₆F₅)₄, exhibit reasonable catalytic activity for ethylene homo‐ and copolymerization giving linear polyethylene with high to ultra‐high molecular weight (600·× 10³–3600·× 10³ g/mol). The activity of 1a /Al(iBu)₃/Ph₃CB(C₆F₅)₄ shows a positive comonomer effect, leading to over 400% increase of the polymer yield, while the addition of 1‐octene causes a slight reduction of the activity of the complexes 2a‐2d . The complexes with the NMe₂ donor group ( 2a , 2d , 1a ) display a high ability to incorporate a comonomer (up to 9–22 mol%), and the use of a bulkier donor group, N(iPr)₂ ( 2b , 2c ), results in a lower 1‐octene incorporation. All the produced copolymers reveal a broad chemical composition distribution. In addition, the investigated complexes polymerized propylene with the moderate ( 1a , 2a ) to low ( 2b‐2d ) activity, giving polymers with different microstructures, from purely atactic to isotactically enriched (mmmm = 28%). © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017 , 55, 2467–2476     

Zum Einfluß der PR3‐Liganden auf Bildung und Eigenschaften der Phosphinophosphiniden‐Komplexe [{η2‐tBu2P–P}Pt(PR3)2] und [{η2‐tBu2P1–P2}Pt(P3R3)(P4R′3)]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes XXI The Influence of the PR₃ Ligands on Formation and Properties of the Phosphinophosphinidene Complexes [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PR₃)₂] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³R₃)(P⁴R′₃)] (R₃P)₂PtCl₂ and C₂H₄ yield the compounds [{η²‐C₂H₄}Pt(PR₃)₂] (PR₃ = PMe₃, PEt₃, PPhEt₂, PPh₂Et, PPh₂Me, PPh₂ⁱPr, PPh₂^tBu and P(p‐Tol)₃); which react with ^tBu₂P–P=PMe^tBu₂ to give the phosphinophosphinidene complexes [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PMe₃)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PEt₃)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPhEt₂)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂Et)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂Me)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂ⁱPr], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂^tBu)₂] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(P(p‐Tol)₃)₂]. [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₃)₂] reacts with PMe₃ and PEt₃ as well as with ^tBu₂PMe, PⁱPr₃ and P(c‐Hex)₃ by substituting one PPh₃ ligand to give [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me₃)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Ph₃)(P⁴Me₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Et₃)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me^tBu₂)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³ⁱPr₃)(P⁴Ph₃)] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³(c‐Hex)₃)(P⁴Ph₃)]. With ^tBu₂PMe, [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(P(p‐Tol)₃)₂] forms [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me^tBu₂)(P⁴(p‐Tol)₃)]. The NMR data of the compounds are given and discussed with respect to the influence of the PR₃ ligands.     

Crystalline Diuranium Phosphinidiide and μ‐Phosphido Complexes with Symmetric and Asymmetric UPU Cores

Reaction of [U(Tren^TIPS)(PH₂)] ( 1 , Tren^TIPS=N(CH₂CH₂NSiPrⁱ₃)₃) with C₆H₅CH₂K and [U(Tren^TIPS)(THF)][BPh₄] ( 2 ) afforded a rare diuranium parent phosphinidiide complex [{U(Tren^TIPS)}₂(μ‐PH)] ( 3 ). Treatment of 3 with C₆H₅CH₂K and two equivalents of benzo‐15‐crown‐5 ether (B15C5) gave the diuranium μ‐phosphido complex [{U(Tren^TIPS)}₂(μ‐P)][K(B15C5)₂] ( 4 ). Alternatively, reaction of [U(Tren^TIPS)(PH)][Na(12C4)₂] ( 5 , 12C4=12‐crown‐4 ether) with [U{N(CH₂CH₂NSiMe₂Bu^t)₂CH₂CH₂NSi(Me)(CH₂)(Bu^t)}] ( 6 ) produced the diuranium μ‐phosphido complex [{U(Tren^TIPS)}(μ‐P){U(Tren^DMBS)}][Na(12C4)₂] [ 7 , Tren^DMBS=N(CH₂CH₂NSiMe₂Bu^t)₃]. Compounds 4 and 7 are unprecedented examples of uranium phosphido complexes outside of matrix isolation studies, and they rapidly decompose in solution underscoring the paucity of uranium phosphido complexes. Interestingly, 4 and 7 feature symmetric and asymmetric UPU cores, respectively, reflecting their differing steric profiles.     

Bildung und Strukturen von [{η2‐tBu2P–P=P–PtBu2}Pt(PR3)2]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XVIII. Syntheses and Structures of [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P=P–P^tBu₂}Pt(PR₃)₂] ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ reacts with [{η²‐C₂H₄} · Pt(PR₃)₂] as well as with [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PR₃)₂] yielding [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P=P–P^tBu₂}Pt(PR₃)₂]; PR₃ = PMe₃ 3 a , PEtPh₂ 3 b , 1/2 dppe 3 c , PPh₃ 3 d , P(p‐Tol)₃ 3 e . All compounds are characterized by ¹H and ³¹P NMR spectra, for 3 b and 3 d also crystal structure determinations were performed. 3 b crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 (No. 2) with a = 1212.58(7), b = 1430.74(8), c = 1629.34(11) pm, α = 77.321(6), β = 70.469(5), γ = 87.312(6)°. 3 d crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 (No. 2) with a = 1122.60(9), b = 1355.88(11), c = 2025.11(14) pm, α = 83.824(9), β = 82.498(9), γ = 67.214(8)°.     

Bildung und Struktur des [{η2‐tBu2P–P}Pt(PHtBu2)(PPh3)]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XX Formation and Structure of [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PH^tBu₂)(PPh₃)] [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Ph₃)(P⁴Ph₃)] ( 2 ) reacts with ^tBu₂PH exchanging only the P³Ph₃ group to give [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³H^tBu₂)(P⁴Ph₃)] ( 1 ). The crystal stucture determination of 1 together with its ³¹P{¹H} NMR data allow for an unequivocal assignment of the coupling constants in related Pt complexes. 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 (no. 2) with a = 1030.33(15), b = 1244.46(19), c = 1604.1(3) pm, α = 86.565(17)°, β = 80.344(18)°, γ = 74.729(17)°.     

Pincer‐Type Heck Catalysts and Mechanisms Based on PdIV Intermediates: A Computational Study

Pincer‐type palladium complexes are among the most active Heck catalysts. Due to their exceptionally high thermal stability and the fact that they contain Pd^II centers, controversial Pd^II/Pd^IV cycles have been often proposed as potential catalytic mechanisms. However, pincer‐type Pd^IV intermediates have never been experimentally observed, and computational studies to support the proposed Pd^II/Pd^IV mechanisms with pincer‐type catalysts have never been carried out. In this computational study the feasibility of potential catalytic cycles involving Pd^IV intermediates was explored. Density functional calculations were performed on experimentally applied aminophosphine‐, phosphine‐, and phosphite‐based pincer‐type Heck catalysts with styrene and phenyl bromide as substrates and (E)‐stilbene as coupling product. The potential‐energy surfaces were calculated in dimethylformamide (DMF) as solvent and demonstrate that Pd^II/Pd^IV mechanisms are thermally accessible and thus a true alternative to formation of palladium nanoparticles. Initial reaction steps of the lowest energy path of the catalytic cycle of the Heck reaction include dissociation of the chloride ligands from the neutral pincer complexes [{2,6‐C₆H₃(XPR₂)₂}Pd(Cl)] [X=NH, R=piperidinyl ( 1 a ); X=O, R=piperidinyl ( 1 b ); X=O, R=iPr ( 1 c ); X=CH₂, R=iPr ( 1 d )] to yield cationic, three‐coordinate, T‐shaped 14e^? palladium intermediates of type [{2,6‐C₆H₃(XPR₂)₂}Pd]⁺ ( 2 ). An alternative reaction path to generate complexes of type 2 (relevant for electron‐poor pincer complexes) includes initial coordination of styrene to 1 to yield styrene adducts [{2,6‐C₆H₃(XPR₂)₂}Pd(Cl)(CH₂?CHPh)] ( 4 ) and consecutive dissociation of the chloride ligand to yield cationic square‐planar styrene complexes [{2,6‐C₆H₃(XPR₂)₂}Pd(CH₂?CHPh)]⁺ ( 6 ) and styrene. Cationic styrene adducts of type 6 were additionally found to be the resting states of the catalytic reaction. However, oxidative addition of phenyl bromide to 2 result in pentacoordinate Pd^IV complexes of type [{2,6‐C₆H₃(XPR₂)₂}Pd(Br)(C₆H₅)]⁺ ( 11 ), which subsequently coordinate styrene (in trans position relative to the phenyl unit of the pincer cores) to yield hexacoordinate phenyl styrene complexes [{2,6‐C₆H₃(XPR₂)₂}Pd(Br)(C₆H₅)(CH₂?CHPh)]⁺ ( 12 ). Migration of the phenyl ligand to the olefinic bond gives cationic, pentacoordinate phenylethenyl complexes [{2,6‐C₆H₃(XPR₂)₂}Pd(Br)(CHPhCH₂Ph)]⁺ ( 13 ). Subsequent β‐hydride elimination induces direct HBr liberation to yield cationic, square‐planar (E)‐stilbene complexes with general formula [{2,6‐C₆H₃(XPR₂)₂}Pd(CHPh?CHPh)]⁺ ( 14 ). Subsequent liberation of (E)‐stilbene closes the catalytic cycle.     

Electronically Strongly Coupled Divinylheterocyclic‐Bridged Diruthenium Complexes

Complexes [{Ru(CO)Cl(PiPr₃)₂}₂(μ‐2,5‐(CH?CH)₂‐^cC₄H₂E] (E=NR; R=C₆H₄‐4‐NMe₂ ( 10 a ), C₆H₄‐4‐OMe ( 10 b ), C₆H₄‐4‐Me ( 10 c ), C₆H₅ ( 10 d ), C₆H₄‐4‐CO₂Et ( 10 e ), C₆H₄‐4‐NO₂ ( 10 f ), C₆H₃‐3,5‐(CF₃)₂ ( 10 g ), CH₃ ( 11 ); E=O ( 12 ), S ( 13 )) are discussed. The solid state structures of four alkynes and two complexes are reported. (Spectro)electrochemical studies show a moderate influence of the nature of the heteroatom and the electron‐donating or ‐withdrawing substituents R in 10 a – g on the electrochemical and spectroscopic properties. The CVs display two consecutive one‐electron redox events with ΔE°′=350–495 mV. A linear relationship between ΔE°′ and the σ_p Hammett constant for 10 a–f was found. IR, UV/Vis/NIR and EPR studies for 10 ⁺– 13 ⁺ confirm full charge delocalization over the {Ru}CH?CH‐heterocycle‐CH?CH{Ru} backbone, classifying them as Class III systems according to the Robin and Day classification. DFT‐optimized structures of the neutral complexes agree well with the experimental ones and provide insight into the structural consequences of stepwise oxidations.     

Heterobimetallic Nickel(II) Complexes of Ferrocenyldithiophosphonates. Molecular Structures of [{FcP(OR)S2}2Ni] [Fc = Fe(η5‐C5H4)(η5‐C5H5), R = Et,Pri, Bus,Bui]

The reaction of 2,4‐diferrocenyl‐1,3‐dithiadiphosphetane 2,4‐disulfide [FcPS(μ‐S)]₂ [Fc = Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] with alcohols ROH gave the corresponding ferrocenyldithiophosphonic acids [FcPS(OR)(SH)], which were treated in situ with Ni(CH₃COO)₂·4H₂O in acetic acid to yield the square‐planar heterobimetallic trinuclear complexes [{FcP(OR)S₂}₂Ni] (R = Me ( 1 ), Et ( 2 ), Prⁱ ( 3 ), Bu^s ( 4 ) and Buⁱ ( 5 )). Compounds 1‐5 were characterized by elemental analysis, MS, NMR (¹H, ¹³C and ³¹P), IR spectroscopy, and 2‐5 also by X‐ray crystallography. Cyclovoltammetric studies on the heterobimetallic nickel(II) complexes 1‐5 showed irreversible reduction to unstable nickel(I) complexes and an irreversible two‐electron oxidation of the sulfur‐containing nickel fragments, followed by a reversible one‐electron oxidation of the two ferrocenyl groups.     

Zur Chemie des Dimesityleisens. X. Mesityleisenkomplexe [FeMes(X)]2 mit zentraler {Fe2(μ-Mes)2}-Einheit (Mes = C6H2-2,4,6-(CH3)3)

Chemistry of Dimesityl Iron. X. Mesityl Iron Complexes [FeMes(X)]₂ with a Central {Fe₂(μ-Mes)₂} Unit (Mes = C₆H₂-2,4,6-(CH₃)₃) Dimeric complexes [{MesFe(OAryl)}₂] with coordination number (CN) of 3 are obtained from Fe₂Mes₄ 1 by partial acidolyses with 2,6-di-tert-butyl-substituted phenols (HOAryl). 1 reacts with 1,3-diketones in a molar ratio of 1:2 to [{MesFe(diketonate)}₂] with CN 4. A central {Fe₂(μ-Mes)₂}-unit with short Fe—Fe distances of 2.56 to 2.63 Å ( 1: 2.615 Å) is found in both types of complexes. The mixed ligand complexes react with an excess of phenol or diketone to {Fe(OAryl)₂} or {Fe(diketonate)₂}, respectively. 1 reacts with HOAryl in the molar ratio of 1:1 to [Fe₂(μ-Mes)₂Mes(OAryl)]. The structures of [Fe₂(μ-Mes)₂(OC₆H₂-2,6-tBu₂-4-CH₃)₂] ( 3 ), [Fe₂(μ-Mes)₂Mes(OC₆H₂-2,4,6-tBu₃)] ( 5 ) and [Fe₂(μ-Mes)₂{(tBuCO)₂CH}₂] ( 9 ) are presented.     

[Co(g5‐Me5C5)(g3‐tBu2PPCH–CH3)] aus [Co(g5‐Me5C5)(g2‐C2H4)2] und tBu2P–P=P(Me)tBu2

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XVII [1] [Co(g⁵‐Me₅C₅)(g³‐^tBu₂PPCH–CH₃)] from [Co(g⁵‐Me₅C₅)(g²‐C₂H₄)₂] and ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ [Co(η⁵‐Me₅C₅)(η³‐^tBu₂PPCH–CH₃)] 1 is formed in the reaction of [Co(η⁵‐Me₅C₅)(η²‐C₂H₄)₂] 2 with ^tBu₂P–P 4 (generated from ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ 3 ) by elimination of one C₂H₄ ligand and coupling of the phosphinophosphinidene with the second one. The structure of 1 is proven by ³¹P, ¹³C, ¹H NMR spectra and the X‐ray structure analysis. Within the ligand ^tBu₂P¹P²C¹H–CH₃ in 1 , the angle P1–P2–C1 amounts to 90°. The Co, P1, P2, C1 atoms in 1 look like a „butterfly”︁. The reaction of 2 with a mixture of ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ 3 and ^tBu–C?P 5 yields [Co(η⁵‐Me₅C₅){η⁴‐(^tBuCP)₂}] 6 and 1 . While 6 is spontaneously formed, 1 appears only after complete consumption of 5 .     

2J(P,C) and 3J(P,C) Coupling Constants in Some New Phosphoramidates. Crystal Structures of CF3C(O)N(H)P(O)[N(CH3)(CH2C6H5)]2 and 4‐NO2‐C6H4N(H)P(O)[4‐CH3‐NC5H9]2

Some new phosphoramidates were synthesized and characterized by ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR, IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The structures of CF₃C(O)N(H)P(O)[N(CH₃)(CH₂C₆H₅)]₂ ( 1 ) and 4‐NO₂‐C₆H₄N(H)P(O)[4‐CH₃‐NC₅H₉]₂ ( 6 ) were confirmed by X‐ray single crystal determination. Compound 1 forms a centrosymmetric dimer and compound 6 forms a polymeric zigzag chain, both via ‐N‐H…O=P‐ intermolecular hydrogen bonds. Also, weak C‐H…F and C‐H…O hydrogen bonds were observed in compounds 1 and 6 , respectively. ¹³C NMR spectra were used for study of ²J(P,C) and ³J(P,C) coupling constants that were showed in the molecules containing N(C₂H₅)₂ and N(C₂H₅)(CH₂C₆H₅) moieties, ²J(P,C)>³J(P,C). A contrast result was obtained for the compounds involving a five‐membered ring aliphatic amine group, NC₄H₈. ²J(P,C) for N(C₂H₅)₂ moiety and in NC₄H₈ are nearly the same, but ³J(P, C) values are larger than those in molecules with a pyrrolidinyl ring. This comparison was done for compounds with six and seven‐membered ring amine groups. In compounds with formula XP(O)[N(CH₂R)(CH₂C₆H₅)]₂, ²J(P,CH₂)_benzylic>²J(P,CH₂)_aliphatic, in an agreement with our previous study.