Pilot study on railway noise attenuation by belts of trees

Sound levels from passing trains were recorded. Both maximum A-weighted sound pressure levels L_{A, max} and equivalent levels L_Aeq over 60 second time periods containing each pass-by were measured. Recordings of 15 pass-bys were made at each of two different sites. At each site attenuation over level, grass-covered ground and through shelter belts was measured 1.5 m above ground. Attenuation differences at each site were due to both minor variations in terrain configuration (track above/below adjacent terrain) and to attenuation in vegetation. The latter cannot be separated. L_Aeq attenuations were smaller than L_A,max attenuations, as should be expected. Noise reduction by shelter belts—i.e., the approximate difference between attenuation over grass-covered ground and thouugh vegetation, respectively—was nearly the same, expressed in L_{A, max} and L_Aeq values. Shelter belts selected for this investigation were carefully maintained. Their overall structure, therefore, was very uniform. Behind a dense, 15 year old shelter belt, 50 m wide, consisting of beeches and various conifers planted between older birches and elms, noise levels were 8 to 9 dB lower than in level grass-covered country. Behind a dense, 10 to 20 year old shelter belt, 25 m wide, consisting of oaks, hornbeams, poplars, silver firs and various sorts of bushes, noise levels were 6 or 7 dB lower than in level grass-covered country. The attenuations measured seemed to be of such an order of magnitude that similar belts of trees and bushes could be a means of practical noise reduction. Further investigations, therefore, seem to be worthwhile.     

Annoyance and self-reported sleep disturbances due to structurally radiated noise from railway tunnels

In Norway, the requirement for structure borne noise from tunnels is L_pAFmax = 32 dB inside dwellings. According to the Norwegian Standard 8175 it is expected that up to 20% of the exposed population are disturbed by the noise at this level. However, the scientific basis for this noise limit is poor. The aim of this study was to determine the degree of annoyance and self-reported sleep disturbances as a function of L_pAFmax. In the present study, 521 dwellings exposed to structural sound from railway rock-tunnels were identified. A questionnaire was sent to one randomly selected person above 18 years of age from each dwelling. The results showed that both noise induced annoyance and reported sleep disturbances were significantly related to L_pAFmax. Other factors that increased the annoyance were high pass-by frequency of freight trains per day, and degree of sound insulation of the windows. At L_pAFmax = 32 dB, 20% were slightly or more than slightly annoyed, and 4% were moderately or more than moderately annoyed. According to the pre-existing assumption that up to 20% of the exposed population are disturbed by the noise at this level, the present results give support to the Norwegian noise limit L_pAFmax = 32 dB inside dwellings of structure borne noise from railway tunnels.     

Urban ambient outdoor and indoor noise exposure at home: A population-based study on schoolchildren

To investigate residential exposure to environmental noise among children in an urban area, a noise measurement campaign was performed at the residences of 44 schoolchildren. Outdoor and indoor noise levels were simultaneously recorded during one week inside and outside each child’s bedroom and in the other room where each child spent most of his or her time, called “the main room”. Associations between equivalent noise levels and familial or environmental characteristics were explored.The recorded equivalent continuous sound levels (L_Aeq) were prone to large variability between dwellings regardless of the measurement location and time of day. Factors linked to outdoor noise level differed from those associated with indoor noise level. Indoor noise levels were associated with the number of children present and noise sources present in the dwelling, whereas outdoor L_Aeq depended significantly on the socio-economic status (SES) of the household. An association was found between the type of view from the window and outdoor L_Aeq, but no significant association was observed between view from the window and indoor L_Aeq. These results support a complex link between noise exposure and the characteristics of the dwelling and of the family, and highlight the contribution of the indoor noise sources to the ambient noise level.Considering the observed acoustic levels and their variability, the sensitivity of children to noise, and the length of time they spend at home, research efforts are needed to better quantify noise exposure at home if the actual burden of noise on child health is to be identified.     

Estimation of the long term average sound level from hourly average sound levels

It is shown how to estimate the long-term average sound level, L_AeqLT (for free flowing road traffic) from measurements of the hourly A-weighted equivalent sound level, L_Aeq1h. To estimate the parameters of the model which describe noise emission and attenuation, concurrent measurements of L_Aeq1h at two distances from the considered road are needed. A semi-empirical formula is derived for L_AeqLT approximation. Also the uncertainty of this approximation is given as a function the distance from the road and receiver height.     

The response to railway noise in residential areas in Great Britain

The effects of railway noise on residents have been measured with a combined social survey (1453 respondents) and noise measurement survey (over 2000 noise measurements) at 403 locations in 75 study areas in Great Britain. In the analysis of the data methods have been used which take into account many typical noise survey problems including noise measurement errors, unique locality effects and the weakness of the noise annoyance relationship. Railway noise bothers 2% of the nation's population. Approximately 170 000 people live where railway noise levels are above 65 dB(A) 24 hour L_eq. Annoyance increases steadily with noise level; thus there is no particular “acceptable” noise level. Railway noise is less annoying than aircraft or road traffic noise of equivalent noise level, at least above 50 to 65L_eq. Noise is rated as the most serious environmental nuisance caused by railways. Maintenance noise is rated as a bigger problem than passing train noise. Vibration is the most important non-noise problem. Reactions to vibrations are related to distance from route, train speed and number of trains. The railway survey's highly stratified, probability sample design with many study areas makes it possible to evaluate the effects of area characteristics on reactions. The 24 h L_eq dB(A) noise index is more closely related to annoyance than are other accepted noise indices examined. There is no support for ambient noise level or night-time corrections. Thirteen railway operation characteristics were examined. One, the type of traction, has a strong effect on reactions after controlling for L_eq (overhead electrified routes are the equivalent of about 10 dB less annoying at high noise levels). Three indicators of railway ancillary noises and non-noise environmental nuisances affect annoyance but most operational characteristics have no effect. The effects of over 35 demographic, attitudinal and neighbourhood characteristics on annoyance are examined. Though most objective characteristics of neighbourhoods and respondents are not correlated with annoyance, three do decrease annoyance (older dwellings, older respondents, and life-time residence). The attitudes which affect annoyance with railway noise are not general ones about railways as transportation sources, but rather ones which are specific to the neighbourhood setting or to railways as environmental intrusions in the neighbourhood. Such attitudes often have less effect on annoyance at low noise levels. In such cases it is the reactions of the more annoyed types of people which are most closely related to noise level.     

Estimating traffic noise for inclined roads with freely flowing traffic

Traffic noise measurements on the kerbs of 19 independent inclined trunk roads with freely flowing traffic within the residential areas of Hong Kong are carried out in the present investigation. The performance of the existing noise prediction models in predicting traffic noise from inclined roads is evaluated. By regression analysis and simple physical consideration of the traffic noise production mechanisms, formulae for the prediction of the L_A10, L_A50, L_A90 and L_Aeq are developed or re-calibrated. Results suggest tyre noise has the major contribution to the overall noise environment when the source is an inclined trunk road. Also, the road gradient is found to have a higher contribution to the traffic noise than assumed in the existing models, but becomes unimportant when the background noise level L_A90 is concerned.     

Investigation of the dose-response relationship for road traffic noise in Assiut, Egypt

A field study has been carried out in urban Assiut city, Egypt. The goals of this study are: (1) to carry out measurements to evaluate road traffic noise levels, (2) to determine if these levels exceeds permissible levels, (3) to examine people’s attitudes towards road traffic noise, (4) to ascertain the relationship between road traffic noise levels and degree of annoyance. The measurements indicate that traffic noise noise levels are higher than those set by Egyptian noise standards and policy to protect public health and welfare in residential areas: equivalent continuous A - weighted sound pressure levels (L_A eq) = 80 dB and higher were recorded, while maximum permissible level is 65 dB. There is a strong relationship between road traffic noise levels and percentage of highly annoyed respondents. Higher road traffic noise levels mean that the percentage of respondents who feel highly annoyed is also increased.     

A rail noise prediction model for the Tehran-Karaj commuter train

Rail noise prediction models enable consideration of different scenarios for the optimal management of noise prevention and mitigation. This project is aimed at developing an equation that enables computation of L_A,max for the Tehran-Karaj commuter train, a type of Diesel-Electric Locomotive. The form of the proposed model is derived from equations for predicting L_A,max for a single locomotive pass-by, proposed in the manual prepared by Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc. for the US Federal Transit Administration, and in the French rail noise prediction model. The algorithm for predicting L_A,max for the Tehran-Karaj commuter train has been developed on the basis of the 50 measurements from 5 locations at distances of 25 m, 35 m, 45 m, 55 m, and 65 m from the centre of the track and at a height of 1.5 m. In the field measurements, the reference distance and the reference vehicle speed have respectively been set equal to 25 m and 80 km per hour. The reference L_A,max, length and the speed correction coefficients have been estimated from the field measurements and have been found to be 86.2 dB(A), 11.3, and 18.4 respectively. The fitness test (Kolmogorov-Smirnov) and regression analysis indicate satisfactory results.     

Road traffic noise levels, restrictions and annoyance in Greater Cairo, Egypt

This study concerns road traffic noise in Greater Cairo, the capital and the largest city in Egypt and the eleventh biggest city in the world. Extensive measurements were carried out in 21 sites in Greater Cairo. Restrictions were introduced to improve environmental conditions including: (i) a ban on horns, (ii) a ban on horns and trucks, (iii) a ban on horns, trucks and noisy buses. Equivalent noise levels (L_Aeq) were measured before and after these restrictions. The equivalent noise level was considerably reduced by the bans. This shows that the town planner can use various strategies to change the traffic composition in order to achieve quieter city environments. The degree of annoyance was measured by means of questionnaire. The results showed that there was a strong relationship between road traffic noise levels and the percentage of highly annoyed respondents.     

Nocturnal road traffic noise assessment and sleep research: The usefulness of different timeframes and in- and outdoor noise measurements

In this paper, we investigated the procedure of noise assessment in the study of nocturnal noise exposure during sleep in the home situation. The use of two different timeframes (fixed from 11 PM to 07 AM versus personal “Time in Bed” period) was explored as well as the relation between indoor and outdoor noise levels and between the actual and estimated noise levels. Noise recordings were performed inside and outside the bedroom of 24 subjects living in high density road traffic noise areas in the Brussels’ Capital Region during seven consecutive days. Indoor and outdoor noise indicators L_Aeq, L_Amax and individual noise events were analysed. Subjects completed a daily sleep log in which the Time in Bed period was assessed. The results indicate that, for outdoor noise assessment, the use of an average L_Aeq might not be sufficient to reflect well the noise levels during the sleep period. For indoor measurements, significant differences were found in the comparison between both timeframes (L_Aeq: T = 16; p < .001). Considering the relation between indoor and outdoor measurements, low correlations (r = .49; p < .001) were found even when the location of the bedroom as a mediating factor was accounted for (street side; r = .52; p < .001). Therefore, from our study, caution is needed when relying on outdoor noise measurements for the evaluation of sleep disturbances. Furthermore, one needs to be aware of the weak correspondence between indoor and outdoor noise levels in the discussion of what a harmonized noise indicator for the evaluation of noise exposure and sleep disturbances should consist of.     

Road traffic noise attenuation by belts of trees

Measurements were made at a number of sites of road traffic noise propagating through belts of trees and bushes and above grass-covered ground, respectively. The belt widths were between 3 and 25 m. The distance from the road to the front of the belts also varied from site to site. The microphones were placed 1·5 m above the ground. A comparison between attenuations obtained, expressed as differences in equivalent constant A-weighted sound pressure levels, L_Aeq, showed no significantly higher attenuation values for propagation through belts of trees than for propagation above grass-covered ground. Only in the frequency range above 2 kHz were attenuations significantly higher through the belts of trees and bushes. The belts of trees selected consisted mainly of deciduous trees and bushes between 5 and 10 years of age. Such types and widths are representative of what could often be used in normal urban situations in an attempt to provide practical noise reduction. According to the results of this investigation, however, these do not significantly reduce L_Aeq 1·5 m above the ground. Planting of belts of trees and bushes between roads and dwellings might influence the environmental quality of residential areas due to nonacoustic factors or reduce nuisance due to spectral changes not affecting L_Aeq. This has not been investigated.     

Assessment criterion for indoor noise disturbance in the presence of low frequency sources

Several studies have presented the effects of environmental noise in and around buildings and communities in which people live and work. In particular, the noise introduced into a building is mostly evaluated using the A weighted sound pressure level (L_Aeq) as the only parameter to determine the perceived disturbance. Nevertheless, if noise is produced by activities or sources characterised by a low frequency contribution, the measurement of L_Aeq underestimates the real disturbance, in particular during sleeping time.     

Characteristics of train noise in above-ground and underground stations with side and island platforms

Railway stations can be principally classified by their locations, i.e., above-ground or underground stations, and by their platform styles, i.e., side or island platforms. However, the effect of the architectural elements on the train noise in stations is not well understood. The aim of the present study is to determine the different acoustical characteristics of the train noise for each station style. The train noise was evaluated by (1) the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level (L_Aeq), (2) the amplitude of the maximum peak of the interaural cross-correlation function (IACC), (3) the delay time (τ₁) and amplitude (?₁) of the first maximum peak of the autocorrelation function. The IACC, τ₁ and ?₁ are related to the subjective diffuseness, pitch and pitch strength, respectively. Regarding the locations, the L_Aeq in the underground stations was 6.4 dB higher than that in the above-ground stations, and the pitch in the underground stations was higher and stronger. Regarding the platform styles, the L_Aeq on the side platforms was 3.3 dB higher than on the island platforms of the above-ground stations. For the underground stations, the L_Aeq on the island platforms was 3.3 dB higher than that on the side platforms when a train entered the station. The IACC on the island platforms of the above-ground stations was higher than that in the other stations.     

DIFFERENT EFFECTS OF ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE AND FROGS' CROAKING ON NIGHT SLEEP

This study was designed to assess the effects of road traffic noise and frogs' croaking on the objective and subjective quality of sleep in a laboratory. The subjects were seven male students aged 19-21 years. They were exposed to recorded road traffic noise and frogs' croaking, with 49·6 and 49·5 dB(A)L_Aeq , and 71·2 and 56·1 dB(A) L_Amax, respectively. The background noise in the experimental room was 31·0 dB(A) L_Aeq. The sleep EEG was recorded according to standard methods. The sleep polygraphic parameters examined were the percentage of sleep stage relative to the total sleep time (%S1, %S2, %S(3+4), %SREM, %MT), total sleep time, sleep onset latency, and awakening during sleep in minutes and sleep efficiency. A structured sleep rating questionnaire (OSA), was administered to the subjects after they awakened. The %S2 increased and the %SREM decreased during exposure to road traffic noise. However, no significant effect of exposure to frogs' croaking was observed on any of the polygraphic sleep parameters. The subjective quality of sleep was degraded more by exposure to road traffic noise than that to frogs' croaking.     

Annoyance due to railway noise before and after the opening of the Kyushu Shinkansen Line

The development of the Shinkansen railway network in Japan has continued since 1964; however, associated noise and vibration have seriously affected communities located beside the lines. The Kyushu Shinkansen Line (KSL) was opened in 2011 and a second temporary conventional railway line (STL) was operated in 2012. The purpose of this study was to compare community responses to railway noise and vibration before and after the opening of these two lines. Socio-acoustic surveys were performed in Kumamoto from 2009 to 2012, where the conventional and Shinkansen lines are adjacent. The noise and vibration exposures were increased slightly after the opening of the KSL but decreased slightly after the opening of the STL. When multiple logistic regression analysis was applied using highly annoyed/annoyed as the dependent variable and using day–evening–night sound level (L_den) and a dummy variable of before or after the opening of the KSL as independent variables, high annoyance was not changed significantly but moderate annoyance decreased significantly following the opening. There was no significant difference in either high or moderate annoyance between the periods before and after the opening of the STL.     

Estimating the model-specific uncertainty of aircraft noise calculations

Aircraft noise contours are estimated with model calculations. Due to their impact, e.g., on land use planning, calculations need to be highly accurate, but their uncertainty usually remains unaccounted for. The objective of this study was therefore to quantify the uncertainty of calculated average equivalent continuous sound levels (L_Aeq) of complex scenarios such as yearly air operations, and to establish uncertainty maps. The methodology was developed for the simulation program FLULA2. In a first step, the partial uncertainties of modelling the aircraft as a sound source and of modelling sound propagation were quantified as a function of aircraft type and distance between aircraft and receiver. Then, these uncertainties were combined for individual flights to obtain the uncertainty of the single event level (L_AE) at a specified receiver grid. The average L_Aeq of a scenario results from the combination of the L_AE of many single flights, each of which has its individual uncertainties. In a last step, the uncertainties of all L_AE were therefore combined to the uncertainty of the L_Aeq, accounting also for uncertainties of the number of movements and of prognoses. Uncertainty estimations of FLULA2 calculations for Zurich and Geneva airports revealed that the standard uncertainty of the L_Aeq ranges from 0.5 dB (day) to 1.0 dB (night) for past-time scenarios when using radar data as input, and from 1.0 dB (day) to 1.3 dB (night) for future scenarios, in areas where L_Aeq ⩾ 53 dB (day) and L_Aeq ⩾ 43 dB (night), respectively. Different uncertainty values may result for other models and/or airports, depending on the model sophistication, traffic input data, available sound source data, and airport peculiarities such as the specific aircraft fleet or prevailing departure and arrival procedures. The methodology, while established for FLULA2 on Zurich and Geneva airports, may be applied to other models and/or airports, but the partial uncertainties have to be specifically re-established to account for individual models and underlying sound source data.     

A theory of patterns of passby noise

Some people say they are annoyed by traffic noise. There is rather a lot of evidence to show that where traffic noise is louder, more people say they are annoyed by it. On the basis of this sort of evidence, there is a consensus that road traffic noise causes annoyance, but some studies have detected unexplained peaks of annoyance in quieter places, or a plateau of annoyance in high noise. Such anomalies may especially affect those sensitive to noise. The pattern of alternation of passby noise and background traffic noise explains the positioning in soundspace of anomalies variously reported at 60 dB(A) L_eq, 4000 NV and 1800 NHV. Such anomalies occur where there are regular or rapidly alternating patterns of passby noise.     

Sleep disturbance caused by meaningful sounds and the effect of background noise

To study noise-induced sleep disturbance, a new procedure called “noise interrupted method”has been developed. The experiment is conducted in the bedroom of the house of each subject. The sounds are reproduced with a mini-disk player which has an automatic reverse function. If the sound is disturbing and subjects cannot sleep, they are allowed to switch off the sound 1 h after they start to try to sleep. This switch off (noise interrupted behavior) is an important index of sleep disturbance. Next morning they fill in a questionnaire in which quality of sleep, disturbance of sounds, the time when they switched off the sound, etc. are asked. The results showed a good relationship between L_Aeq and the percentages of the subjects who could not sleep in an hour and between L_Aeq and the disturbance reported in the questionnaire. This suggests that this method is a useful tool to measure the sleep disturbance caused by noise under well-controlled conditions.     

Transportation noise annoyance: Testing of a probabilistic model

This analysis extends the development and testing of a probabilistic model of noise annoyance proposed in an earlier paper [1]. In the model, noise, measured as the level and number of specific events, leads to annoyance through its interference with activities. Testing of the model is based on noise and survey data collected at 56 sites around Toronto International Airport. Logit analysis is used to estimate equations to predict the probabilities of activity interference and annoyance due to road traffic noise and aircraft noise at each site. From these equations, probabilities of high annoyance are predicted and are compared with the proportion of respondents at each site reporting being highly annoyed. For this comparison, the sites are grouped on the basis of having the same 24 hour L_eq. Both predicted and reported annoyance values are consistently higher for aircraft noise than for road traffic noise at the same 24 hour L_eq. The results support the underlying argument of the model that previously reported source differences in dose-response relationships can be explained by using a model based on single event rather than daily average noise measures.     

Community responses to road traffic noise in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City

Vietnam is a developing country in southeast Asia, and its environment has been seriously affected by industrialization and urbanization. In large cities like Hanoi (northern Vietnam) and Ho Chi Minh City (southern Vietnam), noise emission from road traffic has been found to be a serious concern among general public. In 2005 and 2007, two large-scale socio-acoustic surveys of community response to road traffic noise were conducted to investigate human reactions to road traffic noise in these cities; the sample sizes were 1503 people in Hanoi and 1471 in Ho Chi Minh City. The noise exposure levels (L_den) were 70–83 dB in Hanoi and 75–83 dB in Ho Chi Minh City. Noise annoyance was estimated using standardized annoyance scales. For both cities, dose–response relationships were established between L_den and the percentage of highly annoyed respondents. Compared to annoyance responses of European people, Vietnamese were less annoyed by road traffic noise by about 5 dB. Hanoi respondents seemed to be more annoyed by noise than Ho Chi Minh City respondents. Conversation and sleep disturbances were not as serious as expected in either city. Furthermore, window orientation in the home was found to affect activity disturbances.