Confluences of agendas: Emigrant mathematicians in transit in Denmark, 1933–1945

The present paper analyses the confluence of agendas held by Danish mathematicians and German refugees from Nazi oppression as they unfolded and shaped the mathematical milieu in Copenhagen during the 1930s. It does so by outlining the initiatives to aid emigrant intellectuals in Denmark and contextualises the few mathematicians who would be aided. For most of those, Denmark would be only a transit on the route to more permanent immigration, mainly in the US. Thus, their time in Copenhagen would exert only temporary influence over Danish mathematics; but as it will be argued, the impacts of their transit would be more durable both for the emigrants and for the Danish mathematical milieu. It is thus argued that the influx of emigrant mathematicians helped develop the institutional conditions of mathematics in Copenhagen in important ways that simultaneously bolstered the international outlook of Danish mathematicians. These confluences of agendas became particularly important for Danish mathematics after the war, when the networks developed during the 1930s could be drawn upon.     

Metaphoric and metonymic signification in mathematics

This paper explores the roles of metaphor and metonymy in making sense of the ambiguities inherent in representation of mathematical constructs. Using the metaphors of “chains of signification” and “descent into meaning” for metonymies and metaphors respectively, these literary figures are discussed with regard to their use in mathematics. Synonymy, homonymy and polysemy are viewed as explanatory constructs in an analysis of ways in which metaphor and metonymy aid learners and mathematicians alike in making sense of mathematical ideas and resolving ambiguities.     

Experienced engineers becoming mathematics teachers: preliminary perceptions of mathematics teaching

Engineers who choose to change careers and become mathematics teachers are a specific group as far as their mathematics learning in the context of engineering and their previous work experience are concerned. Regarding mathematics, they mainly engaged in applied mathematics associated with engineering, which is a highly practical field. This research explores experienced engineers’ perceptions of mathematics teaching-related topics, before starting their studies in a pre-service mathematics teacher preparation programme. This research explores their perceptions of mathematics as a discipline, mathematics teaching and mathematical understanding. The qualitative research involves three mechanical engineers, two industrial management engineers, and an electrical engineer. Semi-structured interviews were conducted before the beginning of the programme, and analysed qualitatively. The participants view engineering as an applied and changing discipline while perceiving mathematics as closed, rigorous, accurate, systematic, theoretical and as a tool for engineering. They mostly address general features of mathematics teaching while expressing a more multifaceted view of mathematical understanding. Due to the specific characteristics of the participants, this study may contribute to planning mathematics teacher preparation programmes for engineers.     

Images of mathematicians: a new perspective on the shortage of women in mathematical careers

Though women earn nearly half of the mathematics baccalaureate degrees in the United States, they make up a much smaller percentage of those pursuing advanced degrees in mathematics and those entering mathematics-related careers. Through semi-structured interviews, this study took a qualitative look at the beliefs held by five undergraduate women mathematics students about themselves and about mathematicians. The findings of this study suggest that these women held stereotypical beliefs about mathematicians, describing them to be exceptionally intelligent, obsessed with mathematics, and socially inept. Furthermore, each of these women held the firm belief that they do not exhibit at least one of these traits, the first one being unattainable and the latter two being undesirable. The results of this study suggest that although many women are earning undergraduate degrees in mathematics, their beliefs about mathematicians may be preventing them from identifying as one and choosing to pursue mathematical careers.     

Reading mathematics for understanding—From novice to expert

As students progress through the college mathematics curriculum, enter graduate school and eventually become practicing mathematicians, reading mathematics textbooks and journal articles appears to become easier and leads to increased proficiency and understanding. This study was designed to begin to understand how mathematically more advanced readers read for understanding in mathematical exposition as it appears in textbooks compared to first-year undergraduate students. Three faculty members and three graduate students participated in this study and read from a first-year graduate textbook in an area of mathematics unfamiliar to each of them. The observed reading strategies of these more mathematically advanced readers are compared to observed reading strategies of first-year undergraduate students from an earlier study. The reading methods of the faculty level mathematicians were all quite similar and were markedly different from those that have been identified for undergraduate students, as well as from those used by the graduate students in this study. A Mathematics Reading Framework is proposed based on this study and previous research documenting the strategies that first-year undergraduate students use for reading exposition in their mathematics textbooks.     

Distinguishing Features of Mechanical and Human Problem-Solving

Over the years, research in mathematical problem-solving has examined expert/novice problem-solving performance on various types of problems and subjects. In particular, DeFranco examined two groups of Ph.D. mathematicians as they solved four mathematics problems and found that although all were content experts, only one group were problem-solving experts. Based on this study, this article posits the notion that one distinguishing feature between experts and novices is that experts tend to look for special features of a problem and use algorithms only as a “fail-safe” system while novices act like “machines” relying on algorithms to solve the problems. Why? The article explores the idea that novice problem solvers learned to solve problems the way they learned proof, that is, in a formal, abstract and mechanizable way. Beliefs about proof and the culture in which it is practiced help frame a mathematician's view of the discipline and ultimately impacts classroom practice. The authors believe that current classroom instruction tends to create a culture that fosters algorithmic proficiency and a “machine-like” approach to the learning of mathematics and problem-solving. Further, they argue that mathematicians need to be aware of the distinction between knowing a proof is true and explaining why it is true. When these distinctions are appreciated and practiced during classroom instruction, then and only then will students begin to acquire the mathematical knowledge to become better problem solvers.     

The hidden mathematics of the mars exploration rover mission

Conclusions  A lot of the mathematics of MER is hidden and not only from the public but even from the applied scientists working on the mission. As briefly sketched above, for the scientists, this could be disastrous in a worst-case scenario. The hiding of mathematics, both in our everyday life and within science itself, is a matter not often discussed in public —which in itself is a disaster, taking into account the consequences the hiding of mathematics might have for the public. We like to think that this article may help let in some light. Another question raised by our work is that of beliefs in mathematics. Only occasionally are the beliefs of mathematicians discussed. We found repeatedly that mathematical elements of MER are not actually considered to be mathematics among the applied scientists themselves, not on first hand anyway. Is this due to the fundamentally different views of what mathematics is between applied scientists (including engineers) and pure scientists of the 20th century? We do not know. Finally, we comment on the nature of the mathematics involved in MER. Because of the extreme nature of a Mars mission, one might expect “extreme” mathematics, mathematics developed for the sole purpose of this mission.     

A characterization of dynamic reasoning: Reasoning with time as parameter

Students incorporate and use the implicit and explicit parameter time to support their mathematical reasoning and deepen their understandings as they participate in a differential equations class during instruction on solutions to systems of differential equations. Therefore, dynamic reasoning is defined as developing and using conceptualizations about time as a parameter that implicitly or explicitly coordinates with other quantities to understand and solve problems. Students participate in the following types of mathematical activity related to dynamic reasoning: making time an explicit quantity, using the metaphor of time as “unidimensional space”, using time to reason both quantitatively and qualitatively, using three-dimensional visualization of time related functions, fusing context and representation of time related functions, and using the fictive motion metaphor for function. The purpose of this article is to present a characterization of dynamic reasoning and promote more explicit attention to this type of reasoning by teachers in K-16 mathematics in order to improve student understanding in time related areas of mathematics.     

The relationship between mathematicians’ pedagogical goals,orientations, and common teaching practices in advanced mathematics

Despite mathematics educators’ research into more effective modes of teaching, lecture is still the dominant mode of instruction in undergraduate mathematics courses. Surveys suggest this is because most mathematicians believe this is the best way to teach. This paper answers a call by mathematics education researchers to explore mathematicians’ needs and goals concerning teaching. We interviewed eight mathematicians about findings in the mathematics education research literature concerning common pedagogical practices of instructors of advanced mathematics classes: “chalk talk,” the presentation of formal and informal content, and teacher questioning. We then analyzed the responses for resources, orientations, and goals that might influence the participants to engage in these practices. We describe how participants believed common lecturing practices allowed them to achieve their goals and aligned with their orientations. We discuss these findings in depth and consider what implications they may have for researchers that aim to change mathematicians’ teaching practices.     

Olga Taussky,a torchbearer for mathematics and teacher of mathematicians

Olga Taussky-Todd's mathematical and personal life (1906-1995), her achievements and obstacles, her scientific reasoning and teaching all have served as inspiration to many mathematicians. We describe her role in the mathematics world of the previous century as a torchbearer for mathematics and mathematicians, bearing the “torch of scientific truth” that burns inside of mathematics and its applications. Besides her many deep math contributions – too many to elaborate – she excelled at distilling and presenting mathematical concepts and ideas in her work and gave us many visionary papers and math talks. By sharing her mathematical vision freely she has inspired many of us. (© 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

The Experimental Mathematician: the Pleasure of Discovery and the Role of Proof

The emergence of powerful mathematical computing environments, the growing availability of correspondingly powerful (multi-processor) computers and the pervasive presence of the internet allow for mathematicians, students and teachers, to proceed heuristically and ‘quasi-inductively’. We may increasingly use symbolic and numeric computation, visualization tools, simulation and data mining. The unique features of our discipline make this both more problematic and more challenging. For example, there is still no truly satisfactory way of displaying mathematical notation on the web; and we care more about the reliability of our literature than does any other science. The traditional role of proof in mathematics is arguably under siege – for reasons both good and bad.     

Metaphor or Met-Before? The effects of previouos experience on practice and theory of learning mathematics

While the general notion of ‘metaphor’ may offer a thoughtful analysis of the nature of mathematical thinking, this paper suggests that it is even more important to take into account the particular mental structures available to the individual that have been built from experience that the individual has ‘met-before.’ The notion of ‘met-before’ offers not only a principle to analyse the changing meanings in mathematics and the difficulties faced by the learner—which we illustrate by the problematic case of the minus sign—it can also be used to analyse the met-befores of mathematicians, mathematics educators and those who develop theories of learning to reveal implicit assumptions that support our thinking in some ways and act as impediments in others.     

“Mathematicians Would Say It This Way”: An Investigation of Teachers' Framings of Mathematicians

Although popular media often provides negative images of mathematicians, we contend that mathematics classroom practices can also contribute to students' images of mathematicians. In this study, we examined eight mathematics teachers' framings of mathematicians in their classrooms. Here, we analyze classroom observations to explore some of the characteristics of the teachers' framings of mathematicians in their classrooms. The findings suggest that there may be a relationship between a teachers' mathematics background and his/her references to mathematicians. We also argue that teachers need to be reflective about how they represent mathematicians to their students, and that preservice teachers should explore their beliefs about what mathematicians actually do.     

Which mathematics should we teach engineering students? An empirically grounded case for a broad notion of mathematical thinking

While many engineering educators have proposed changes to theway that mathematics is taught to engineers, the focus has oftenbeen on mathematical content knowledge. Work from the mathematicseducation community suggests that it may be beneficial to considera broader notion of mathematics: mathematical thinking. Schoenfeldidentifies five aspects of mathematical thinking: the mathematicscontent knowledge we want engineering students to learn as wellas problem-solving strategies, use of resources, attitudes andpractices. If we further consider the social and material resourcesavailable to students and the mathematical practices studentsengage in, we have a more complete understanding of the breadthof mathematics and mathematical thinking necessary for engineeringpractice. This article further discusses each of these aspectsof mathematical thinking and offers examples of mathematicalthinking practices based in the authors' previous empiricalstudies of engineering students' and practitioners' uses ofmathematics. The article also offers insights to inform theteaching of mathematics to engineering students.     

How to connect school mathematics with students' out-of-school knowledge

In this paper we present an explorative study for which special cultural artifacts have been used, i.e. supermarket receipts, to try to construct with 9-year old pupils (fourth class of primary school) a new mathematical knowledge, i.e. the algorithm for multiplication of decimal numbers. Furthermore also estimation and approximation processes have been introduced, procedures that are not commonly used in ordinary teaching activity. In our study the receipts, through some modifications, have become more explicitly tools of mediation and integration between in and out-of school knowledge, so they can be utilized to create new mathematical goals, thus becoming real mathematizing tools and constituting a didactic interface between in and out-of-school mathematics. In agreement with ethnomathematical perspective we deem that it is a task for the teacher to know, in order to be able to profitably take account of the teaching, the life experienced by the pupil. Future mathematics teachers should be prepared a) to see mathematics incorporated into real world, b) to investigate mathematical ideas and practices of their pupils, and c) to look for ways to incorporate into the curriculum elements belonging to the sociocultural environment of the pupils, as a starting point for mathematical activities in the classroom. In this way the motivation, interest and curiosity of the pupils will be increased and the attitude towards mathematics of both pupils and teachers will be changed.     

Mathematics teaching before and after the Meiji Restoration

This paper outlines mathematical education before the Meiji Restoration, and how it changed as a result. The Meiji Restoration in 1868 completely changed the social structure of Japan. In the Edo period (1600?C1868) Japan was divided into domains (han) governed by local lords (daimyo). Tokugawa Shogunate supervised local lords and governed Japan indirectly. In the Edo period there were no wars for more than two centuries and many people participated in cultural activities. Japanese mathematics developed in its own way under the influence of old Chinese mathematics. Japan also had a good education system so that the literacy rate was quite high. Each domain had its own school for samurai but mainly education was provided privately. Private schools for elementary education were called terakoya, in which mainly reading and writing and often arithmetic by the soroban (Japanese abacus) were taught. In the Edo period the soroban (abacus) was the only tool for computation and Arabic numerals were not used. The Meiji government was eager to establish a modern centralized state in which education played a key role. In 1872 the Ministry of Education declared the Education Order, whereby in elementary schools only western mathematics should be taught and the soroban should not be used. But almost all teachers only knew Japanese traditional mathematics ??wasan?? so they insisted on using the soroban. This was the starting point of a long dispute on the soroban in elementary education in Japan. Two Japanese mathematicians, KIKUCHI Dairoku and FUJISAWA Rikitaro, played a central role in the modernization of mathematical education in Japan. KIKUCHI studied mathematics in England and brought back English synthetic geometry to Japan. FUJISAWA was a student of KIKUCHI at the Imperial University and studied mathematics in Germany. He was the first Japanese mathematician to make a contribution to original research in the modern sense. He published a book on mathematical education in elementary school, which built the foundation of mathematical education in Japan.