Success-factors in transition to university mathematics

This study examines different factors' relative importance for students' performance in the transition to university mathematics. Students' characteristics (motivation, actions and beliefs) were measured when entering the university and at the end of the first year. Principal component analysis revealed four important constructs: Self-efficacy, Motivation type, Study habits and Views of mathematics. Subsequently, orthogonal partial least squares (OPLS) analysis was used for measuring the constructs' ability to predict students' university mathematics grades. No individual constructs measured at the time of entrance predicted more than 5% of the variation. On the other hand, jointly they predicted 14%, which is almost in pair with upper secondary grades predicting 17%. Constructs measured at the end of the first year were stronger predictors, jointly predicting 37% of the variation in university grades, with Self-efficacy (21%) and Motivation (12%) being the two strongest individual predictors. In general, Study habits were not important for predicting university achievement. However, for students with low upper secondary grades, the textbook and interaction with peers, rather than internet-based resources, contributed positively to achievement. The association between Views of mathematics and performance was weak for all groups and non-existing for students with low grades.     

Types of reasoning required in university exams in mathematics

Empirical research shows that students often use reasoning founded on copying algorithms or recalling facts (imitative reasoning) when solving mathematical tasks. Research also indicate that a focus on this type of reasoning might weaken the students’ understanding of the underlying mathematical concepts. It is therefore important to study the types of reasoning students have to perform in order to solve exam tasks and pass exams. The purpose of this study is to examine what types of reasoning students taking introductory calculus courses are required to perform. Tasks from 16 exams produced at four different Swedish universities were analyzed and sorted into task classes. The analysis resulted in several examples of tasks demanding different types of mathematical reasoning. The results also show that about 70% of the tasks were solvable by imitative reasoning and that 15 of the exams could be passed using only imitative reasoning.     

A metacognitive intervention in mathematics at university level

The paper reports the main results of an instructional study. The study was aimed at improving the performance in mathematics of a group of university students of biology who repeatedly failed the final examination of a compulsory course in mathematics. The main difficulties of these students seemed to be metacognitive and affective in nature. The training therefore worked on metacognitive and affective features: knowledge about cognition, monitoring, beliefs, emotions and attitudes. The intervention was successful: at the end of the course all students passed the examination that they had failed so often. The results also suggest that it may be possible (and necessary) to ‘teach learning to learn’ mathematics.     

Blended learning in first year engineering mathematics

There are many choices for learning mathematics for engineering students with courses available in face-to-face, blended and fully online modalities. Stude     

Teaching and learning mathematics in the collective

In this paper we analyse and explore teaching and learning in the context of a high school mathematics classroom that was deliberately structured as highly interactive and inquiry-oriented. We frame our discussion within enactivism—a theory of cognition that has helped us to understand classroom processes, particularly at the level of the group. We attempt to show how this classroom of mathematics learners operated as a collective and focus in particular on the role of the teacher in establishing, sustaining, and becoming part of such a collective. Our analysis reveals teaching practices that value, capitalize upon, and promote group cognition, our discussion positions such work as teaching a way of being with mathematics, and we close by offering implications for teaching, educational policy, and further research.     

A three-year perspective on conceptions of and orientations to learning mathematics of prospective teachers and first year university students

The paper reports a compilation of results from three studies conducted over three years to determine students' conceptions of mathematics, and orientations they follow in learning the subject. Respondents were 459 first year mathematics students from four universities and one teacher college. Results indicated that more than half the sample reported mathematics to be a subject made of numbers and formulae that could be memorized. This suggests a shallow emphasis when learning the subject, with no intention to understand. However, most students passed their examinations. It was concluded that there was no statistically significant relationship between examinations results and students' learning orientations. It is recommended that lecturers should foster students' meta-learning capabilities and an awareness of different learning strategies.     

Reforming mathematics learning in Indonesian classrooms through RME

This paper reports an experimental study on the development of exemplary curriculum materials for the teaching of fractions in Indonesian primary schools. The study’s context is the current reform movement adopting realistic mathematics education (RME) theory, known as Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI), and it looked at the role of design research in supporting the dissemination of PMRI. The study was carried out in two cycles of teaching experiments in two primary schools. The findings of the design research signified the importance of collaboration between mathematics educators and teachers in developing RME curriculum materials. The availability of RME curriculum materials is an important component in the success of the PMRI movement, particularly in supporting students and teachers in activity-based mathematics learning. Most of the students and teachers in the two schools positively appraised teaching and learning with the developed materials. Since the teachers were actively involved in developing the materials, they felt a sense of ownership and recognised that their students’ classroom experiences of the materials helped them avoid standard difficulties. That appears to be a particular benefit of the bottom-up approach characteristic of the PMRI movement.     

Changing patterns of transition from school to university mathematics

There has been widespread concern over the lack of preparedness of students making the transition from school to university mathematics and the changing profile of entrants to mathematical subjects in higher education has been well documented. In this paper, using documentary analysis and data from an informal case study, we locate the antecedents of this changed profile in the general shift across all subjects to a more utilitarian higher education, alongside the more specific changes in A-level mathematics provision which have been largely market driven. Our conclusions suggest that, ironically, changes put in place to make mathematics more widely useful may result in it losing just those features that make it marketable.     

The use of concrete learning objects taken from the history of mathematics in mathematics education

This study aimed to reveal the effects of teaching with concrete learning objects taken from the history of mathematics on student achievement. Being a quasi-experimental study, it was conducted with two grade 8 classes in a secondary school located in Trabzon. The experimental group consisted of 27 students and the control group consisted of 25. Data were collected by using worksheets, an achievement exam and written opinion forms. The data from the achievement exam were analysed by using the Mann-Whitney U-test while the data from written opinion forms were analysed through content analysis. The Mann–Whitney U-test results showed a significant difference between the mean ranks of the experimental and control groups in favour of the former. Findings from the written opinion forms suggested that the students found the activities to be instructive and fun, enjoyed using concrete models in their classes, and learned from discovering the rules. It was also found that students had previously not engaged in similar activities and had only experienced the history of mathematics through the life stories and works of mathematicians and the representation of ancient numbers at the beginning of each unit.     

Understanding the complexities of student motivations in mathematics learning

Student motivation has long been a concern of mathematics educators. However, commonly held distinctions between intrinsic and extrinsic motivations may be insufficient to inform our understandings of student motivations in learning mathematics or to appropriately shape pedagogical decisions. Here, motivation is defined, in general, as an individual's desire, power, and tendency to act in particular ways. We characterize details of motivation in mathematical learning through qualitative analysis of honors calculus students’ extended, collaborative problem solving efforts within a longitudinal research project in learning and teaching. Contextual Motivation Theory emerges as an interpretive means for understanding the complexities of student motivations. Students chose to act upon intellectual-mathematical motivations and social-personal motivations that manifested simultaneously. Students exhibited intellectual passion in persisting beyond obtaining correct answers to build understandings of mathematical ideas. Conceptually driven conditions that encourage mathematical necessity are shown to support the growth of intellectual passion in mathematics learning.     

Integrating technology into mathematics teaching at the university level

The emergence of new computing technologies in the second half of the twentieth century brought about new potentials and promised the rapid transformation of the teaching and learning of mathematics. However, despite the vast investments in technology resources for schools and universities, the realities of schooling and the complexities of technology-equipped environments resulted in a much slower integration process than was predicted in the 1980s. Hence researchers, together with teachers and mathematicians, began examining and reflecting on various aspects of technology-assisted teaching and learning and on the causes of slow technology integration. Studies highlighted that as technology becomes increasingly available in schools, teachers’ beliefs and conceptions about technology use in teaching are key factors for understanding the slowness of technology integration. In this paper, I outline the shift of research focus from learning and technology environment-related issues to teachers’ beliefs and conceptions. In addition, I highlight that over the past two decades a considerable imbalance has developed in favour of school-level research against university-level research. However, several changes in universities, such as students declining mathematical preparedness and demands from other sciences and employers, necessitate closer attention to university-level research. Thus, I outline some results of my study that aimed to reflect on the paucity of research and examined the current extend of technology use, particularly Computer Algebra Systems (CAS) at universities, mathematicians’ views about the role of CAS in tertiary mathematics teaching, and the factors influencing technology integration. I argue that due to mathematicians’ extensive use of CAS in their research and teaching, documenting their teaching practices and carrying out research at this level would not only be beneficial at the university level but also contribute to our understanding of technology integration at all levels.     

Teachers learning the registers of mathematics and mathematics education in another language: an exploratory study

Many mathematics teachers around the world teach in a language different from the one in which they studied or completed their teacher education. Often these teachers must learn both the registers of mathematics and of mathematics education to teach in the additional language. This paper examines the factors that help teachers to learn these registers in Māori, the Indigenous language of New Zealand. Many of these teachers are second-language learners of the Māori language and attended English-medium schools and teacher-education programmes. After a brief discussion about the key role of language in teaching mathematics, this paper examines data from teachers at two Māori-immersion schools and a professional development facilitator. The analysis provides initial understanding of the factors that support or hinder their learning of the mathematics registers. Finally, a research agenda is suggested for further investigation of this issue.