Sounds and pictures: dynamism and dualism in Dynamic Geometry

In this paper, we examine and evaluate several new mathematical representations developed for The Geometer’s Sketchpad v5 (GSP5) from the perspective of their dynamic mathematical and pedagogic utility or expressibility. We claim the primary contributions of Dynamic Geometry’s principle of dynamism to the emerging concept of “Dynamic Mathematics” to be twofold: first, the powerful, temporalized representation of continuity and continuous change (dynamism’s mathematical aspect), and second, the sensory immediacy of direct interaction with mathematical representations (dynamism’s pedagogic aspect). Seen from this perspective, the growth of “Dynamic Mathematics software,” beyond the initial conception of first-generation planar geometry systems, represents a tremendous diversification and expansion of the mathematical domain of the dynamic principle’s applicability (for example, to dynamic statistics, graphing and 3D geometry). But at the same time, this expansion has come at the cost of a decrease in the immediacy of sensory interactions with mathematical representations, as in so-called dynamic graphing, wherein users modify a graph “at a distance” (through slider-based manipulation of the coefficients of its symbolic equation), or in solid geometry tools, in which users’ interactions with represented solids are mediated and distanced by the inevitably-2D communication interfaces of the computer mouse and screen. Thus we focus on this second aspect–sensory interaction with mathematical representations—in evaluating how novel dynamic representations in GSP5 affect mathematical modeling opportunities, student activity and engagement.     

Software Tools for Geometrical Problem Solving: Potentials and Pitfalls

Dynamic geometry software provides tools for students to construct and experiment with geometrical objects and relationships. On the basis of their experimentation, students make conjectures that can be tested with the tools available. In this paper, we explore the role of software tools in geometry problem solving and how these tools, in interaction with activities that embed the goals of teachers and students, mediate the problem solving process. Through analysis of successful student responses, we show how dynamic software tools can not only scaffold the solution process but also help students move from argumentation to logical deduction. However, by reference to the work of less successful students, we illustrate how software tools that cannot be programmed to fit the goals of the students may prevent them from expressing their (correct) mathematical ideas and thus impede their problem solution.This revised version was published online in September 2005 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Unpacking learner’s growth in geometric understanding when solving problems in a dynamic geometry environment: Coordinating two frames

The emergence of dynamic geometry environments challenges researchers in mathematics education to develop theories that capture learner’s growth in geometric understanding in this particular environment. This study coordinated the Pirie-Kieren theory and instrumental genesis to examine learner’s growth in geometric understanding when solving problems in a dynamic geometry environment. Data analysis suggested that coordinating the two theoretical approaches provided a productive means to capture the dynamic interaction between the growth in mathematical understanding and the formation/application of utilization scheme during a learner’s mathematical exploration with dynamic geometry software. The analysis of one episode on inscribing a square in a triangle was shared to illustrate this approach. This study contributes to the continuing conversation of “networking theories” in the mathematics education research community. By networking the two theoretical approaches, this paper presents a model for studying learner's growth in mathematical understanding in a dynamic learning environment while accounting for interaction with digital tools.     

Prompting Teacher Geometric Reasoning through Coaching in a Dynamic Geometry Software Context

This study investigated the ways in which four middle grades teachers developed mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT) geometry as they implemented dynamic geometry software in their classrooms with the assistance of a coach. Teachers developed various components of MKT by observing coaches teach, by dynamic discourse with students, which is discourse with respect to dynamic geometry software images, and by discussions with coaches. The dynamic geometry software environment proved productive as coaches guided teachers’ growth in explanations, examples, and definitions. The environment also helped teachers discover unnoticed abilities among their low achievers. Moreover, teachers developed confidence to teach with more expert uses of dynamic geometry software.     

Objectifying the adjacent and opposite angles: a cultural historical analysis

The angle topic is central to the development of geometric knowledge. Two of the basic concepts associated with this topic are the adjacent and opposite angles. It is the goal of the present study to analyze, based on the cultural historical semiotics framework, how high-achieving seventh grade students objectify the adjacent and opposite angles’ concepts. We videoed the learning of a group of three high-achieving students who used technology, specifically GeoGebra, to explore geometric relations related to the adjacent and opposite angles’ concepts. To analyze students’ objectification of these concepts, we used the categories of objectification of knowledge (attention and awareness) and the categories of generalization (factual, contextual and symbolic), developed by Radford. The research results indicate that teacher's and students’ verbal and visual signs, together with the software dynamic tools, mediated the students’ objectification of the adjacent and opposite angles’ concepts. Specifically, eye and gestures perceiving were part of the semiosis cycles in which the participating students were engaged and which related to the mathematical signs that signified the adjacent and the opposite angles. Moreover, the teacher's suggestions/requests/questions included/suggested semiotic signs/tools, including verbal signs that helped the students pay attention, be aware of and objectify the adjacent and opposite angles’ concepts.     

Analyzing Student Work as a Professional Development Activity

When worthwhile mathematical tasks are used in classrooms, they should also become a crucial element of assessment. For teachers, using these tasks in classrooms requires a different way to analyze student thinking than the traditional assessment model. Looking carefully at students' written work on worthwhile mathematical tasks and listening carefully while students explore these worthwhile tasks can contribute to a teacher's professional development. This paper reports on a professional development activity in which teachers analyzed mathematical tasks, predicted students' achievement on tasks, evaluated students' written work, listened to students' reasoning, and assessed students' understanding. Teachers' engagement in this way can help them develop flexibility and proficiency in the evaluation of their own students' work. These experiences allow teachers the opportunity to recognize students' potential, strengthen their own mathematical understanding, and engage in conversations with peers about assessment and instruction.     

Geometry‐Related Children's Literature Improves the Geometry Achievement and Attitudes of Second‐Grade Students

Use of mathematics‐related literature can engage students' interest and increase their understanding of mathematical concepts. A quasi‐experimental study of two second‐grade classrooms assessed whether daily inclusion of geometry‐related literature in the classroom improved attitudes toward geometry and achievement in geometry. Consistent with the hypothesis, only the students in the classroom with a strong emphasis on geometry‐related children's literature showed a significant improvement in their attitudes about geometry over time. While both classes improved their geometry performance over the 4 weeks of the study, the class with a strong emphasis on geometry‐related literature improved significantly more (51.2%) than the control class (33.47%). Children's literature can provide a useful and interesting context in which students can develop their understanding of geometry.     

Using components of mathematical ability for initial development and identification of mathematically promising students

Kruteskii's work on the mathematical abilities of school children is a seminal work on the nature of mathematical ability. However, the task of developing methods for the practical application of his work is still a significant problem in mathematics education. The authors have developed a practical application of Kruteskii's approach to the important problem of initially developing components of mathematical ability in student and thereafter identifying mathematically promising students. Examples of problems that were designed to develop ability to generalize, flexibility and reversibility of mental processes are presented. A practical guide for determining the level of development of components of mathematical abilities in individual students, in terms of specified observables, is presented as a set of structured reference tables. The authors set out a practical application protocol that combines use of the tables and sets of specially developed problems for initial development of mathematical abilities prior to identification of mathematically promising students in the general classroom. A significant motivation for this work is the desire to avoid time-consuming and resource intensive practices such as interviews and summer schools which therefore have been used successfully because these practices are now out of reach for all but very wealthy countries or highly ideologically driven systems. On the other hand, special examinations heavily depend on the level of preparedness of the students for the particular examination, and therefore some students with high abilities but with fewer opportunities to prepare could be overlooked.     

Teachers’ views on dynamically linked multiple representations, pedagogical practices and students’ understanding of mathematics using TI-Nspire in Scottish secondary schools

Do teachers find that the use of dynamically linked multiple representations enhances their students’ relational understanding of the mathematics involved in their lessons and what evidence do they provide to support their findings? Throughout session 2008–2009, this empirical research project involved six Scottish secondary schools, two mathematics teachers from each school and students from different ages and stages. Teachers used TI-Nspire PC software and students the TI-Nspire handheld technology. This technology is specifically designed to allow dynamically linked multiple representations of mathematical concepts such that pupils can observe links between cause and effect in different representations such as dynamic geometry, graphs, lists and spreadsheets. The teachers were convinced that the use of multiple representations of mathematical concepts enhanced their students’ relational understanding of these concepts, provided evidence to support their argument and described changes in their classroom pedagogy.     

Explication as a lens for the formalization of mathematical theory through guided reinvention

Realistic Mathematics Education supports students’ formalization of their mathematical activity through guided reinvention. To operationalize “formalization” in a proof-oriented instructional context, I adapt Sjogren's (2010) claim that formal proof explicates (Carnap, 1950) informal proof. Explication means replacing unscientific or informal concepts with scientific ones. I use Carnap's criteria for successful explication – similarity, exactness, and fruitfulness – to demonstrate how the elements of mathematical theory – definitions, axioms, theorems, proofs – can each explicate their less formal correlates. This lens supports an express goal of the instructional project, which is to help students coordinate semantic (informal) and syntactic (formal) mathematical activity. I demonstrate the analytical value of the explication lens by applying it to examples of students’ mathematical activity drawn from a design experiment in undergraduate, neutral axiomatic geometry. I analyze the chains of meanings (Thompson, 2013) that emerged when formal elements were presented readymade alongside those emerging from guided reinvention.     

Mathematical digital escape rooms

Escape rooms have been receiving more attention for use in education. Escape rooms are games in which teams solve multiple puzzles and challenges using clues, hints, and strategy to determine how to escape from a locked room. The implementation of escape rooms has the potential for increasing students' mathematical understanding and engagement. They also enable students to develop teamwork and communication skills which are essential for work, everyday life, and being a productive citizen. The importance of technology for use in education has also received more attention of late. Technology can be utilized with escape rooms for the development of digital escape rooms. This article describes a mathematical digital escape room that was implemented with a class of middle school students. Important principles for developing escape rooms are described and how they were integrated with the digital escape room entitled, Blanca's Building.     

Characterizing prospective secondary teachers’ foundation and contingency knowledge for definitions of transformations

One promising approach for connecting undergraduate content coursework to secondary teaching is using teacher-created representations of practice. Using these representations effectively requires seeing teachers' use of mathematical knowledge in the work of teaching. We argue that the dimensions of Rowland's (2013) Knowledge Quartet, especially Foundation and Contingency, form a fruitful framework for this purpose. We contribute an analytic framework to characterize the quality of mathematical knowledge observed in the Foundation and Contingency dimensions, developed using a purposive sampling from over 300 representations. These representations all featured geometry teaching. We showcase the framework with examples of "high" and "developing" Foundation and Contingency.Then, we compare our coding along these dimensions with performance on a measure of mathematical knowledge for teaching geometry. Finally, we describe the potential for generalizing this framework to other domains, such as algebra and mathematical modeling.     

Validating proofs and counterexamples across content domains: Practices of importance for mathematics majors

Validating proofs and counterexamples across content domains is considered vital practices for undergraduate students to advance their mathematical reasoning and knowledge. To date, not enough is known about the ways mathematics majors determine the validity of arguments in the domains of algebra, analysis, geometry, and number theory—the domains that are central to many mathematics courses. This study reported how 16 mathematics majors, including eight specializing in secondary mathematics education, who had completed more proof-based courses than transition-to-proof classes evaluated various arguments. The results suggest that the students use one of the following strategies in proof and counterexample validation: (1) examination of the argument's structure and (2) line-by-line checking with informal deductive reasoning, example-based reasoning, experience-based reasoning, and informal deductive and example-based reasoning. Most students tended to examine all steps of the argument with informal deductive reasoning across various tasks, suggesting that this approach might be problem dependent. Even though all participating students had taken more proof-related mathematics courses, it is surprising that many of them did not recognize global-structure or line-by-line content-based flaws presented in the argument.     

Student Difficulties with Accessing and Using Mathematical Knowledge

This article examines the issue of why students fail to activate and use mathematical knowledge during problem solving when it is known that they possess the required knowledge. This issue is explored by analyzing problem-solving attempts of a high-achieving student and a low-achieving student in the domain of plane geometry. On the basis of these data and other literature, three major sources of mathematical knowledge-access difficulties are identified that might be considered by classroom teachers, including a student's (1) dispositional state, (2) management of the problem-solving process, and (3) state of organization of his or her mathematical knowledge. It is argued that teaching practices that place emphasis on careful management of problem-solving activity could help students activate and extend the use of mathematical knowledge acquired in lesson activities.     

Historical origins of the nine-point conic. The contribution of Eugenio Beltrami

In this paper, we examine the evolution of a specific mathematical problem, i.e. the nine-point conic, a generalisation of the nine-point circle due to Steiner. We will follow this evolution from Steiner to the Neapolitan school (Trudi and Battaglini) and finally to the contribution of Beltrami that closed this journey, at least from a mathematical point of view (scholars of elementary geometry, in fact, will continue to resume the problem from the second half of the 19th to the beginning of the 20th century). We believe that such evolution may indicate the steady development of the mathematical methods from Euclidean metric to projective, and finally, with Beltrami, with the use of quadratic transformations. In this sense, the work of Beltrami appears similar to the recent (after the anticipations of Magnus and Steiner) results of Schiaparelli and Cremona. Moreover, Beltrami's methods are closely related to the study of birational transformations, which in the same period were becoming one of the main topics of algebraic geometry. Finally, our work emphasises the role played by the nine-point conic problem in the studies of young Beltrami who, under Cremona's guidance, was then developing his mathematical skills. To this end, we make considerable use of the unedited correspondence Beltrami – Cremona, preserved in the Istituto Mazziniano, Genoa.     

Curriculum, Classroom Practices, and Tool Design in the Learning of Functions Through Technology-Aided Experimental Approaches

The paper starts from classroom situations about the study of a functional relationship with help of technological tools as a ‘transposition’ of experimental approaches from research mathematical practices. It considers the limitation of this transposition in existing curricula and practices based on the use of non-symbolic software like dynamic geometry and spreadsheets. The paper focuses then on the potentialities of classroom use of computer algebra packages that could help to go beyond this shortcoming. It looks at a contradiction: while symbolic calculation is a basic tool for mathematicians, curricula and teachers are very cautious regarding their use by students. The rest of the paper considers the design and experiment of a computer environment Casyopée as means to contribute to an evolution of curricula and classroom practices to achieve the transposition in the domain of algebraic activities linked to functions.     

The Tabular Mode: Not Just Another Way to Represent a Function

Understanding mathematical functions as systematic processes involving the covariation of related variables is foundational in learning mathematics. In this article, findings are reported from two investigations examining students' thinking processes with functions. The first study focused on seven middle school students' explorations with a dynamic physical model. Students were videotaped during the 20‐ to 45‐minute sessions occurring two or three times per week over a period of 2 months, and students' written work was collected. The second investigation included 19 preservice elementary and middle school teachers enrolled in a course focusing on a combination of mathematical content and pedagogy. Participants' written problem‐solving work and reflective writing were collected, and participants were individually interviewed in 50‐minute videotaped sessions. Results from both investigations indicated that students often relied on a table, or some variation of a table, as a cognitive link advancing the development of their reasoning about underlying function relationships.     

Promoting uncertainty to support preservice teachers’ reasoning about the tangent relationship

Including opportunities for students to experience uncertainty in solving mathematical tasks can prompt learners to resolve the uncertainty, leading to mathematical understanding. In this article, we examine how preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ thinking about a trigonometric relationship was impacted by a series of tasks that prompted uncertainty. Using dynamic geometry software, we asked preservice teachers to compare angle measures of lines on a coordinate grid to their slope values, beginning by investigating lines whose angle measures were in a near-linear relationship to their slopes. After encountering and resolving the uncertainty of the exact relationship between the values, preservice teachers connected what they learned to the tangent relationship and demonstrated new ways of thinking that entail quantitative and covariational reasoning about this trigonometric relationship. We argue that strategically using uncertainty can be an effective way of promoting preservice teachers’ reasoning about the tangent relationship.