分散液液微萃取-气相色谱法测定水样中甲拌磷农药

建立了基于分散液液微萃取(DLLME)的新型样品前处理方法,并采用气相色谱/氢火焰离子化检测器对水样中痕量的甲拌磷农药进行了测定。考察了影响分散液液微萃取的因素包括萃取溶剂、分散剂、样品体积、萃取温度和离心速度等。在最佳实验条件下,对甲拌磷的富集倍数达到300倍;检出限为0.001μL/L;方法的线性范围为0.01~10μL/L,R2为0.9986;相对标准偏差为6.65%;回收率为104%。将分散液液微萃取法与单滴液相微萃取和离子液体-液相微萃取方法进行了对比,结果表明,分散液液微萃取技术具有操作简单、快捷(前处理时间小于5 min)、富集效果好、回收率高等优点。同时预言,将离子液体与分散液液微萃取结合,将会产生更加满意的结果。     

分散液液微萃取-气相色谱-质谱法测定水样中4种环境激素

以四氯乙烯作萃取剂,以四氢呋喃为分散剂对水样中4种环境激素甲草胺、乙草胺、三唑酮和三唑醇进行分散液液微萃取。提取液用气相色谱-质谱法测定。4种环境激素的质量浓度与其相应峰面积均在0.05～100μg.L-1范围内呈线性关系。甲草胺、乙草胺、三唑酮和三唑醇的检出限(3S/N)分别为0.016,0.015,0.023,0.032μg.L-1。在0.2,2.0mg.kg-1两个添加水平下进行回收试验,4种环境激素的回收率在86.8%～118%之间,测定值的相对标准偏差(n=6)在2.1%～6.2%之间。     

基于轻质萃取剂的溶剂去乳化分散液-液微萃取-气相色谱法测定水样中多环芳烃

以密度小于水的轻质溶剂为萃取剂,建立了无需离心步骤的溶剂去乳化分散液-液微萃取-气相色谱(SD-DLLME-GC)测定水样中多环芳烃的新方法。传统分散液-液微萃取技术一般采用密度大于水的有机溶剂为萃取剂,并需要通过离心步骤促进分相。而本方法以密度比水小的轻质溶剂甲苯为萃取剂,将其与丙酮(分散剂)混合并快速注入水样,获得雾化体系;然后注入乙腈作为去乳化剂,破坏该雾化体系,无需离心,溶液立即澄清、分相;取上层有机相(甲苯)进行GC分析。考察了萃取剂、分散剂、去乳化剂的种类及其体积等因素对萃取率的影响。以40 μL甲苯为萃取剂,500 μL丙酮为分散剂,800 μL乙腈为去乳化剂,方法在20～500 μg/L范围内呈现出良好的线性(r2=0.9942～0.9999),多环芳烃的检出限(S/N=3)为0.52～5.11 μg/L。用所建立的方法平行测定5份质量浓度为40 μg/L的多环芳烃标准水样,其含量的相对标准偏差为2.2%～13.6%。本法已成功用于实际水样中多环芳烃的分析,并测得其加标回收率为80.2%～115.1%。     

分散液液微萃取-气相色谱/质谱法测定水中多环芳烃

用分散液液微萃取-气相色谱/质谱法测定水样中的16种多环芳烃(PAHs)。通过实验确定最佳萃取条件为:20μL四氯化碳作萃取剂,1.0 mL乙腈作分散剂,超声萃取1 min。在优化条件下,多环芳烃的富集倍数达到216～511,方法在0.05～50μg/L范围内呈良好的线性关系,相关系数(R2)在0.9873～0.9983之间,检出限为0.0020～0.14μg/L。相对标准偏差(RSD)在3.82%～12.45%(n=6)之间。该方法成功用于实际水样中痕量多环芳烃的测定。     

分散液-液微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定环境水样中的多环芳烃

建立了简便、快速、有效的分散液-液微萃取-高效液相色谱-荧光检测(DLLME-HPLC-FLD)测定环境水样中15种多环芳烃(PAHs)的方法。重点探讨了萃取剂的种类和用量、分散剂的种类和用量以及萃取时间等对PAHs萃取效率的影响。在优化的条件下,评价了方法的可靠性。15种PAHs在0.01～10 μg/L范围内呈良好的线性关系,相关系数r均不小于0.9913,峰面积的相对标准偏差(RSD)在2.3%～4.7%之间(n=6)。在优化条件下,富集因子和萃取回收率良好,分别为674～1032和67.4%～103.2%,15种PAHs的检出限(S/N=3)在0.0003～0.002 μg/L之间。建立的方法应用于敖江水样中PAHs的检测,平均加标回收率在79.5%～92.3%之间,RSD在4.3%～6.7%范围内(n=5)。该方法适用于环境水样中痕量PAHs的分析。     

超声辅助萃取-分散液液微萃取/气相色谱法测定环境水样中六氯苯、林丹及硫丹

建立了超声辅助萃取(UAE)-分散液液微萃取(DLLME)/气相色谱法测定环境水样中六氯苯、林丹和硫丹,并对影响萃取和富集效率的因素进行了优化。在最优条件下,六氯苯、林丹及α-硫丹的线性范围为1.0~1 000μg/L,检出限分别为0.47、0.39及0.63μg/L;β-硫丹线性范围为5.0~1 000μg/L,检出限为2.44μg/L;相对标准偏差(RSDs)为8.3%~11.7%(n=7)。用该方法对环境水样中的六氯苯、林丹及硫丹进行了分析,自来水、灌溉水、湖水样的平加标回收率分别为94.2%~100.4%、89.4%~99.4%和69.6%~96.3%。     

分散液液微萃取/气相色谱-质谱法测定水中多氯联苯

为了快速准确的测定水中多种多氯联苯(Polychlorinated Biphenyls, PCBs),建立了分散液液微萃取(Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction, DLLME)与气相色谱-质谱联用,快速测定水中20种PCBs的新方法。方法以二氯甲烷(20μL)为萃取剂,丙酮(1.0 mL)为分散剂,混匀后注入10.0 mL水样中,以4℃、8 000 r/min离心10 min,吸取下层有机相10μL,加入0.2μL内标后进样分析。结果表明,在最佳条件下,20种PCBs能够被充分提取和良好分离。在10.0～500μg/L浓度范围内呈现良好的线性关系,线性相关系数为0.999,检出限为0.7～1.8μg/L。对水样进行20、100、450μg/L的加标实验,相对标准偏差与回收率分别在1.6%～9.7%与72.0%～115%之间,能够满足环境水样中PCBs的测定要求。     

分散液相微萃取-气相色谱法测定水样中六种芳香胺

建立了分散液相微萃取-气相色谱同时测定环境水样中氟苯胺等6种芳香胺的方法.确定了色谱条件,在4 min内实现了对6种芳香胺的分离与测定;对萃取剂种类及用量、分散剂种类及用量;水样pH值、NaCl加入量等前处理条件进行了优化,使得水样中6种芳香胺得到了同时提取和富集.在最佳实验条件下,建立了6种物质的工作曲线,其相关系数...     

分散液液微萃取-气相色谱法快速测定水中23种有机磷农药

建立了分散液液微萃取(DLLME)的新型样品前处理方法,并采用气相色谱/火焰光度检测器对饮用水中的治螟磷、甲拌磷、二嗪农、乙拌磷、甲基毒死蜱、甲基对硫磷、皮蝇磷、杀螟松、马拉硫磷、毒死蜱、倍硫磷、对硫磷、溴硫磷、嘧啶磷、甲基异硫磷、稻丰散、杀扑磷、丙溴磷、乙硫磷、三唑磷、三硫磷、哒嗪硫磷、亚胺硫磷23种痕量有机磷农药残...     

分散液液微萃取-气相色谱法快速测定水中15种硝基苯类物质

建立了分散液液微萃取-气相色谱电子捕获检测器测定水中15种硝基苯类物质的方法.筛选出了具有高密度且能够适用于电子捕获检测器的萃取剂.优化了色谱条件,对萃取剂种类及用量、分散剂种类及用量、萃取时间、萃取温度等条件进行了优化.DB-35毛细管柱对15种硝基苯类物质具有最好的分离效果.使用程序升温,初始80℃ 保持2 min,以5℃/min速率升温至180℃,可以在22 min内完成分离.以100μL氯苯作为萃取剂、400μL甲醇作为分散剂,对5.00 mL水样在室温下进行萃取,仅需30 s即可达到萃取平衡,15种目标物的萃取率均可达到90%以上,富集倍数达到45.0~48.8.离心分离,取下层沉积相进行气相色谱测定,使用电子捕获检测器检测,方法的定量限为0.03~0.15μg/L,线性范围为0.20~50.0μg/L,相关系数不低于0.998.方法的相对标准偏差在3.3%~8.9%之间,加标回收率在86.0%~103.5%之间.     

原位衍生分散液相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱快速测定水中的四溴双酚A

通过研究萃取剂、分散剂的种类和体积,KHCO3用量,衍生剂乙酸酐的用量和萃取时间对萃取效率的影响,建立了原位衍生分散液相微萃取-气相色谱质谱联用测定水中四溴双酚A的方法.方法线性范围:0.5～ 100 μg/L,检出限:0.1μg/L;RSD:5.4％ (n =5).将该方法用于环境水样的测定,加标回收率:53.5％ ...     

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the determination of nitro musks in surface water and wastewater samples

A new, simple, fast and high sensitive analytical method based on dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for the simultaneous determination of nitro musks in surface water and wastewater samples is presented. Different parameters, such as the nature and volume of both the extraction and disperser solvents and the ionic strength and pH of the aqueous donor phase, were optimized. Under the selected conditions (injection of a mixture of 1 mL of acetone as disperser solvent and 50 μL of chloroform as extraction solvent, no salt addition and no pH adjustment) the figures of merit of the proposed DLLME-GC-MS method were evaluated. High enrichment factors, ranging between 230 and 314 depending on the target analyte, were achieved, which redound to limits of detection in the ng L⁻¹ range (i.e., 4-33 ng L⁻¹). The relative standard deviation (RSD) was below 5% for all the target analytes. Finally, the recoveries obtained for different water samples of diverse origin (sea, river, irrigation channel and water treatment plant) ranged between 87 and 116%, thus showing no matrix effects.     

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with gas chromatography for extraction and determination of class 1 residual solvents in pharmaceuticals

The present study reports a new method for analyzing class 1 residual solvents (RSs), 1,1-dichloroethene (1,1-DCE), 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCE), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCE), carbon tetrachloride (CT), and benzene (Bz), in pharmaceutical products using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) combined with gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID). Unlike common DLLME methods, solvents of high boiling point were selected as dispersive and extraction solvents in order to prevent their chromatographic peaks from overlapping with those of analytes that have short retention times. Therefore N,N-dimethyl formamide (DMF) and 1,2-dibromoethane (1,2-DBE) were chosen as dispersive and extraction solvents, respectively. Analytical parameters of the proposed method were determined and good linearities and broad linear ranges (LRs) were obtained. Taking 500 mg samples, limit of detections for the tested pharmaceuticals were obtained as 0.11, 0.03, 0.05, 0.05, and 0.006 μg g(-1) for CT, 1,1-DCE, 1,2-DCE, 1,1,1-TCE, and Bz, respectively, which are considerably much lower than their permissible limits in pharmaceuticals.     

分散液液微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定食品中的维生素A和E

以维生素 A 和 E 萃取率的平均值为检测指标,采用L18(37)正交试验法考察了萃取剂的类型、用量、分散剂的类型、用量以及萃取时间和离子强度6个影响因素,利用高效液相色谱法测定维生素含量.维生素 A 和 E 在0.23～174μg/mL 范围内线性关系良好;定性检出限分别为3.26 ng和7.6 ng(S/N=3);...     

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and liquid chromatographic determination of pentachlorophenol in water

A simple and sensitive dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method for extraction and preconcentration of pentachlorophenol (PCP) in water samples is presented. After adjusting the sample pH to 3, extraction was performed in the presence of 1% W/V sodium chloride by injecting 1 mL acetone as disperser solvent containing 15 μL tetrachloroethylene as extraction solvent. The proposed DLLME method was followed by HPLC-DAD for determination of PCP. It has good linearity (0.994) with wide linear dynamic range (0.1–1000 μg L⁻¹) and low detection limit (0.03 μg L⁻¹), which makes it suitable for determination of PCP in water samples.      

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography–electron capture detection for determination of polychlorinated biphenyls in fish

A new method of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) combined with GC-electron capture detection (GC-ECD) was proposed for the extraction and determination of four polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) congeners in fish samples. Acetone was used as extraction solvent for the extraction of PCBs from fish samples. The target analytes in the acetone solvent were rapidly transferred to chlorobenzene, which was used as extraction solvent in DLLME procedures. Under the optimum conditions, linearity was obtained in the concentration range from 1.25 to 1250 μg/kg for PCB 52, and 0.25 to 250 μg/kg for PCB 101, 138 and 153. Coefficients of correlation (r²) ranged from 0.9993 to 0.9999. The repeatability was tested by spiking fish samples at 10 μg/kg PCBs, and RSD% (n = 8) varied between 2.2 and 8.4%. The LODs were between 0.12 and 0.35 μg/kg. The enrichment factors of PCBs were from 87 to 123. The relative recoveries of the four PCB congeners for the perch, pomfret and yellow-fin tuna at spiking levels of 10, 20 and 50 μg/kg were in the range of 81.20–100.6%, 85.00–102.7% and 87.80–108.4%, respectively. The results demonstrated that DLLME combined with GC-ECD was a simple, rapid, and efficient technique for the extraction and determination of PCBs in fish samples.     

Determination of phthalates in water samples using polyaniline-based solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography

A simple solid-phase microextraction (SPME) device, coupled with gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID), was developed to detect trace levels of phthalates in environmental water samples. Polyaniline (PANI) was chosen as the sorbent for the SPME device and was electrochemically deposited on a stainless steel wire to achieve high thermal and mechanical stability. The porous structure of the PANI film, characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), suggested large extraction capability. Key parameters were optimized and five phthalates were selected to evaluate the SPME-GC procedures. The method was also applied to the analysis of lake and river water samples. Control experiments were carried out using commercial polyacrylate (PA) fiber. The new PANI-SPME-GC method offers high accuracy, precision and sensitivity and low detection limits. Thus, the method developed could be used as a new way to monitor the trace levels of phthalates in water medium. A possible extraction mechanism was investigated using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).     

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection for the determination of three triazole derivatives in environmental water samples

A simple and efficient method known as dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) was demonstrated for the extraction of triadimefon, uniconazole and tebuconazole in real water samples prior to high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV). Several related parameters that could affect the extraction efficiencies were also investigated and optimised. Under the optimum conditions, a linear range was obtained between the peak area and the concentration of the interested analytes over the concentration range of 1.5–100?µg?L^?1 for triadimefon, 2.0–100?µg?L^?1 for uniconazole and tebuconazole, respectively. The limits of detection (LODs) (S/N?=?3) values were in the range of 0.9–1.2?µg?L^?1. The intra-day and inter-day precisions for the analysis ranged from 2.8 to 7.6%. The relative recoveries of the three analytes in tap, well and lake water samples were in the range of 90.6–105.3%. Finally, a comparison of the sensitivity between the proposed DLLME and the improved single-drop microextraction was also evaluated.