Stable bargained equilibria for assignment games without side payments

We consider NTU assignment games, which are generalizations of two-sided markets. Matched pairs bargain over feasible allocations; the disagreement outcome is endogenuously determined, taking in account outside options which are based on the current payoff of other players. An allocation is in equilibrium if and only if each pair is in equilibrium (no player wishes to rebargain). The set of equilibria is not empty and it naturally generalizes the intersection of the core and prekernel of TU assignment games. A set with similar properties does not exist for general NTU games. The main source of technical difficulties is the relatively complicated structure of the core in NTU games. We make a strong use of reduced games and consistency requirements. We generalize also the results obtained by Rochford (1984) for TU assignment games.This is a part of my M.Sc. Thesis written at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem and at the University of Heidelberg. I am deeply indebted to my advisor, Prof. Bezalel Peleg. I wish also to thank Professors Michael Maschler, Avraham Neyman and Terje Lensberg for some helpful discussions, and to Prof. Werner Böge for his hospitality in Heidelberg. Finally, the comments of two anonymous referees greatly improved a preliminary version of this paper.     

Periodic stopping games

Stopping games (without simultaneous stopping) are sequential games in which at every stage one of the players is chosen, who decides whether to continue the interaction or stop it, whereby a terminal payoff vector is obtained. Periodic stopping games are stopping games in which both of the processes that define it, the payoff process as well as the process by which players are chosen, are periodic and do not depend on the past choices. We prove that every periodic stopping game without simultaneous stopping, has either periodic subgame perfect ϵ-equilibrium or a subgame perfect 0-equilibrium in pure strategies. This work is part of the master thesis of the author done under the supervision of Prof. Eilon Solan. I am thankful to Prof. Solan for his inspiring guidance. I also thank two anonymous referees of the International Journal of Game Theory for their comments.     

Denumerable state stochastic games with limiting average payoff

We study stochastic games with countable state space, compact action spaces, and limiting average payoff. ForN-person games, the existence of an equilibrium in stationary strategies is established under a certain Liapunov stability condition. For two-person zero-sum games, the existence of a value and optimal strategies for both players are established under the same stability condition.The authors wish to thank Prof. T. Parthasarathy for pointing out an error in an earlier version of this paper. M. K. Ghosh wishes to thank Prof. A. Arapostathis and Prof. S. I. Marcus for their hospitality and support.     

Value and perfection in stochastic games

A stochastic game isvalued if for every playerk there is a functionr ^k:S→R from the state spaceS to the real numbers such that for every ε>0 there is an ε equilibrium such that with probability at least 1−ε no states is reached where the future expected payoff for any playerk differs fromr ^k(s) by more than ε. We call a stochastic gamenormal if the state space is at most countable, there are finitely many players, at every state every player has only finitely many actions, and the payoffs are uniformly bounded and Borel measurable as functions on the histories of play. We demonstrate an example of a recursive two-person non-zero-sum normal stochastic game with only three non-absorbing states and limit average payoffs that is not valued (but does have ε equilibria for every positive ε). In this respect two-person non-zero-sum stochastic games are very different from their zero-sum varieties. N. Vieille proved that all such non-zero-sum games with finitely many states have an ε equilibrium for every positive ε, and our example shows that any proof of this result must be qualitatively different from the existence proofs for zero-sum games. To show that our example is not valued we need that the existence of ε equilibria for all positive ε implies a “perfection” property. Should there exist a normal stochastic game without an ε equilibrium for some ε>0, this perfection property may be useful for demonstrating this fact. Furthermore, our example sews some doubt concerning the existence of ε equilibria for two-person non-zero-sum recursive normal stochastic games with countably many states. This research was supported financially by the German Science Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) and the Center for High Performance Computing (Technical University, Dresden). The author thanks Ulrich Krengel and Heinrich Hering for their support of his habilitation at the University of Goettingen, of which this paper is a part.     

Stationary,completely mixed and symmetric optimal and equilibrium strategies in stochastic games

In this paper, we address various types of two-person stochastic games—both zero-sum and nonzero-sum, discounted and undiscounted. In particular, we address different aspects of stochastic games, namely: (1) When is a two-person stochastic game completely mixed? (2) Can we identify classes of undiscounted zero-sum stochastic games that have stationary optimal strategies? (3) When does a two-person stochastic game possess symmetric optimal/equilibrium strategies? Firstly, we provide some necessary and some sufficient conditions under which certain classes of discounted and undiscounted stochastic games are completely mixed. In particular, we show that, if a discounted zero-sum switching control stochastic game with symmetric payoff matrices has a completely mixed stationary optimal strategy, then the stochastic game is completely mixed if and only if the matrix games restricted to states are all completely mixed. Secondly, we identify certain classes of undiscounted zero-sum stochastic games that have stationary optima under specific conditions for individual payoff matrices and transition probabilities. Thirdly, we provide sufficient conditions for discounted as well as certain classes of undiscounted stochastic games to have symmetric optimal/equilibrium strategies—namely, transitions are symmetric and the payoff matrices of one player are the transpose of those of the other. We also provide a sufficient condition for the stochastic game to have a symmetric pure strategy equilibrium. We also provide examples to show the sharpness of our results.     

Risk and quality control in a supply chain: competitive and collaborative approaches

This paper provides a quantitative and comparative economic and risk approach to strategic quality control in a supply chain, consisting of one supplier and one producer, using a random payoff game. Such a game is first solved in a risk-neutral framework by assuming that both parties are competing with each other. We show in this case that there may be an interior solution to the inspection game. A similar analysis under a collaborative framework is shown to be trivial and not practical, with a solution to the inspection game being an ‘all or nothing’ solution to one or both the parties involved. For these reasons, the sampling random payoff game is transformed into a Neyman–Pearson risk constraints game, where the parties minimize the expected costs subject to a set of Neyman–Pearson risk (type I and type II) constraints. In this case, the number of potential equilibria can be large. A number of such solutions are developed and a practical (convex) approach is suggested by providing an interior (partial sampling) solution for the collaborative case. Numerical examples are developed to demonstrate the procedure used. Thus, unlike theoretical approaches to the solution of strategic quality control random payoff games, the approach we construct is both practical and consistent with the statistical risk Neyman–Pearson approach.     

Existence of pure Nash equilibria in discontinuous and non quasiconcave games

In a recent but well known paper, Reny has proved the existence of Nash equilibria for compact and quasiconcave games, with possibly discontinuous payoff functions. In this paper, we prove that the quasiconcavity assumption in Reny’s theorem can be weakened: we introduce a measure allowing to localize the lack of quasiconcavity, which allows to refine the analysis of equilibrium existence (I wish to thank P. J. Reny, two anonymous referees and the associated editor for corrections, suggestions and remarks which led to improvements in the paper).     

Separable and low-rank continuous games

In this paper, we study nonzero-sum separable games, which are continuous games whose payoffs take a sum-of-products form. Included in this subclass are all finite games and polynomial games. We investigate the structure of equilibria in separable games. We show that these games admit finitely supported Nash equilibria. Motivated by the bounds on the supports of mixed equilibria in two-player finite games in terms of the ranks of the payoff matrices, we define the notion of the rank of an n-player continuous game and use this to provide bounds on the cardinality of the support of equilibrium strategies. We present a general characterization theorem that states that a continuous game has finite rank if and only if it is separable. Using our rank results, we present an efficient algorithm for computing approximate equilibria of two-player separable games with fixed strategy spaces in time polynomial in the rank of the game. This research was funded in part by National Science Foundation grants DMI-0545910 and ECCS-0621922 and AFOSR MURI subaward 2003-07688-1.     

Pure strategy equilibria in symmetric two-player zero-sum games

We observe that a symmetric two-player zero-sum game has a pure strategy equilibrium if and only if it is not a generalized rock-paper-scissors matrix. Moreover, we show that every finite symmetric quasiconcave two-player zero-sum game has a pure equilibrium. Further sufficient conditions for existence are provided. Our findings extend to general two-player zero-sum games using the symmetrization of zero-sum games due to von Neumann. We point out that the class of symmetric two-player zero-sum games coincides with the class of relative payoff games associated with symmetric two-player games. This allows us to derive results on the existence of finite population evolutionary stable strategies.     

Correlated equilibrium and concave games

This paper shows that if a game satisfies the sufficient condition for the existence and uniqueness of a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium provided by Rosen (Econometrica 33:520, 1965), then the game has a unique correlated equilibrium, which places probability one on the unique pure-strategy Nash equilibrium. In addition, it shows that a weaker condition suffices for the uniqueness of a correlated equilibrium. The condition generalizes the sufficient condition for the uniqueness of a correlated equilibrium provided by Neyman (Int J Game Theory 26:223, 1997) for a potential game with a strictly concave potential function. I thank the editor, an associate editor, and an anonymous referee for detailed comments and suggestions, which have substantially improved this paper. Special thanks are due to the referee for pointing out Lemmas 4 and 5. I acknowledge financial support by The Japan Economic Research Foundation and by MEXT, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research. All remaining errors are mine.     

Robust game theory

We present a distribution-free model of incomplete-information games, both with and without private information, in which the players use a robust optimization approach to contend with payoff uncertainty. Our ``robust game' model relaxes the assumptions of Harsanyi's Bayesian game model, and provides an alternative distribution-free equilibrium concept, which we call ``robust-optimization equilibrium,' to that of the ex post equilibrium. We prove that the robust-optimization equilibria of an incomplete-information game subsume the ex post equilibria of the game and are, unlike the latter, guaranteed to exist when the game is finite and has bounded payoff uncertainty set. For arbitrary robust finite games with bounded polyhedral payoff uncertainty sets, we show that we can compute a robust-optimization equilibrium by methods analogous to those for identifying a Nash equilibrium of a finite game with complete information. In addition, we present computational results. The research of the author was partially supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship and by the Singapore-MIT Alliance. The research of the author was partially supported by the Singapore-MIT Alliance.     

On the existence of equilibria in discontinuous games: three counterexamples

We study whether we can weaken the conditions given in Reny [4] and still obtain existence of pure strategy Nash equilibria in quasiconcave normal form games, or, at least, existence of pure strategy ɛ-equilibria for all ɛ>0. We show by examples that there are:1. quasiconcave, payoff secure games without pure strategy ɛ-equilibria for small enough ɛ>0 (and hence, without pure strategy Nash equilibria),2. quasiconcave, reciprocally upper semicontinuous games without pure strategy ɛ-equilibria for small enough ɛ>0, and3. payoff secure games whose mixed extension is not payoff secure.The last example, due to Sion and Wolfe [6], also shows that non-quasiconcave games that are payoff secure and reciprocally upper semicontinuous may fail to have mixed strategy equilibria.I wish to thank the editor, an associate editor and an anonymous referee for very helpful comments. I thank also John Huffstot for editorial assistance. Any remaining error is, of course, mine     

Adjustment patterns and equilibrium selection in experimental signaling games

This paper examines the relation between adjustment patterns and equilibrium selection in laboratory experiments with two types of simple signaling games. One type of game has two Nash equilibria, of which only one is sequential. The other type has two sequential equilibria, only one of them satisfying equilibrium dominance. For each type of game, the results show that variations in the payoff structure, which do not change the equilibrium configuration, generate different adjustment patterns. As a consequence, the less refined equilibrium is more frequently observed for some payoff structures, while the more refined equilibrium is more frequently observed in others.     

The Compromise Value for Cooperative Games with Random Payoffs

This paper introduces and studies the compromise value for cooperative games with random payoffs, that is, for cooperative games where the payoff to a coalition of players is a random variable. This value is a compromise between utopia payoffs and minimal rights and its definition is based on the compromise value for NTU games and the τ-value for TU games. It is shown that the nonempty core of a cooperative game with random payoffs is bounded by the utopia payoffs and the minimal rights. Consequently, for such games the compromise value exists. Further, we show that the compromise value of a cooperative game with random payoffs coincides with the τ-value of a related TU game if the players have a certain type of preferences. Finally, the compromise value and the marginal value, which is defined as the average of the marginal vectors, coincide on the class of two-person games. This results in a characterization of the compromise value for two-person games.I thank Peter Borm, Ruud Hendrickx and two anonymous referees for their valuable comments.     

Some interesting properties of maximin strategies

Since the seminal paper of Nash (1950) game theoretic literature has focused mostly on equilibrium and not on maximin (minimax) strategies. We study the properties of these strategies in non-zero-sum strategic games that possess (completely) mixed Nash equilibria. We find that under certain conditions maximin strategies have several interesting properties, some of which extend beyond 2-person strategic games. In particular, for n-person games we specify necessary and sufficient conditions for maximin strategies to yield the same expected payoffs as Nash equilibrium strategies. We also show how maximin strategies may facilitate payoff comparison across Nash equilibria as well as refine some Nash equilibrium strategies.     

Cone Concavity and Multiple-Payoff Constrained n-Person Games

This paper investigates special cases of abstract economies, i.e., n-person games with multiple payoff functions. Dominances with certain convex cones and interactive strategies are introduced in such game settings. Gradients of payoff functions are involved to establish certain Lagrange or Kuhn–Tucker conditions which may lead to some algorithms to actually compute an equilibrium. Sufficient and necessary conditions for such multiple payoff constrained n-person games are obtained.     

On stochastic games with additive reward and transition structure

In this paper, we introduce a new class of two-person stochastic games with nice properties. For games in this class, the payoffs as well as the transitions in each state consist of a part which depends only on the action of the first player and a part dependent only on the action of the second player.For the zero-sum games in this class, we prove that the orderfield property holds in the infinite-horizon case and that there exist optimal pure stationary strategies for the discounted as well as the undiscounted payoff criterion. For both criteria also, finite algorithms are given to solve the game. An example shows that, for nonzero sum games in this class, there are not necessarily pure stationary equilibria. But, if such a game possesses a stationary equilibrium point, then there also exists a stationary equilibrium point which uses in each state at most two pure actions for each player.     

Internal correlation in repeated games

This paper characterizes the set of all the Nash equilibrium payoffs in two player repeated games where the signal that the players get after each stage is either trivial (does not reveal any information) or standard (the signal is the pair of actions played). It turns out that if the information is not always trivial then the set of all the Nash equilibrium payoffs coincides with the set of the correlated equilibrium payoffs. In particular, any correlated equilibrium payoff of the one shot game is also a Nash equilibrium payoff of the repeated game.For the proof we develop a scheme by which two players can generate any correlation device, using the signaling structure of the game. We present strategies with which the players internally correlate their actions without the need of an exogenous mediator.     

Unit-sphere games

This paper introduces a class of games, called unit-sphere games, in which strategies are real vectors with unit 2-norms (or, on a unit-sphere). As a result, they should no longer be interpreted as probability distributions over actions, but rather be thought of as allocations of one unit of resource to actions and the payoff effect on each action is proportional to the square root of the amount of resource allocated to that action. The new definition generates a number of interesting consequences. We first characterize the sufficient and necessary condition under which a two-player unit-sphere game has a Nash equilibrium. The characterization reduces solving a unit-sphere game to finding all eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the product matrix of individual payoff matrices. For any unit-sphere game with non-negative payoff matrices, there always exists a unique Nash equilibrium; furthermore, the unique equilibrium is efficiently reachable via Cournot adjustment. In addition, we show that any equilibrium in positive unit-sphere games corresponds to approximate equilibria in the corresponding normal-form games. Analogous but weaker results are obtained in n-player unit-sphere games.     

Polytope Games

Starting from the definition of a bimatrix game, we restrict the pair of strategy sets jointly, not independently. Thus, we have a set , which is the set of all feasible strategy pairs. We pose the question of whether a Nash equilibrium exists, in that no player can obtain a higher payoff by deviating. We answer this question affirmatively for a very general case, imposing a minimum of conditions on the restricted sets and the payoff. Next, we concentrate on a special class of restricted games, the polytope bimatrix game, where the restrictions are linear and the payoff functions are bilinear. Further, we show how the polytope bimatrix game is a generalization of the bimatrix game. We give an algorithm for solving such a polytope bimatrix game; finally, we discuss refinements to the equilibrium point concept where we generalize results from the theory of bimatrix games.