Doubly stochastic matrices which have certain diagonals with constant sums

Let A be an n×n doubly stochastic matrix and suppose that 1?m?n?1. Let τ₁,…,τ_m be m mutually disjoint zero diagonals in A, and suppose that every diagonal of A disjoint from τ₁,…,τ_m has a constant sum. Then aall entries of A off the m zero diagonals have the value (n?m)^?1. This verifies a conjecture of E.T. Wang.     

Existence of solution for a class of nth-order multi-point boundary value problem

In this paper, we are concerned with the following nth-order ordinary differential equation $$x^{(n)}(t)+f(t,x(t),x'(t),\ldots,x^{(n-1)}(t))=0,\quad t\in (0,1),$$ with the nonlinear boundary conditions $$\begin{array}{l}x^{(i)}(0)=0,\quad i=0,1,\ldots,n-3,\\[3pt]g(x^{(n-2)}(0),x^{(n-1)}(0),x(\xi_1),\ldots,x(\xi_{m-2}))=A,\\[3pt]h(x^{(n-2)}(1),x^{(n-1)}(1),x(\eta_1),\ldots,x(\eta_{l-2}))=B,\end{array}$$ here A,B∈R, f:[0,1]×R ⁿ →R is continuous, g:[0,1]×R ^m →R is continuous, h:[0,1]×R ^l →R is continuous, ξ _i ∈(0,1), i=1,…,m?2, and η _j ∈(0,1), j=1,…,l?2. The existence result is given by using a priori estimate, Nagumo condition, the method of upper and lower solutions and Leray-Schauder degree. We also give an example to demonstrate our result.     

Doubly stochastic matrices with some equal diagonal sums

Let A be doubly stochastic, and let τ₁,…,τ_m be m mutually disjoint zero diagonals in A, 1?m?n-1. E. T. H. Wang conjectured that if every diagonal in A disjoint from each τ_k (k=1,…,m) has a constant sum, then all entries in A off the m zero diagonals τ_k are equal to (n?m)^-1. Sinkhorn showed the conjecture to be correct. In this paper we generalize this result for arbitrary doubly stochastic zero patterns.     

On discount residue classes

It is shown that, whenever m₁, m₂,…, m_n are natural numbers such that the pairwise greatest common divisors, d_ij=(m_i, m_j), i≠j are distinct and different from 1, then there exist integers a₁, a₂,…,a_n such that the solution sets of the congruences x≡_i (modm_i), i= 1,2,…,n are disjoint.     

Constructing orthogonal pandiagonal Latin squares and panmagic squares from modular n‐queens solutions

In this article, we show how to construct pairs of orthogonal pandiagonal Latin squares and panmagic squares from certain types of modular n‐queens solutions. We prove that when these modular n‐queens solutions are symmetric, the panmagic squares thus constructed will be associative, where for an n × n associative magic square A = (a_ij), for all i and j it holds that a_ij + an?i?1,n?j?1 = c for a fixed c. We further show how to construct orthogonal Latin squares whose modular difference diagonals are Latin from any modular n‐queens solution. As well, we analyze constructing orthogonal pandiagonal Latin squares from particular classes of non‐linear modular n‐queens solutions. These pandiagonal Latin squares are not row cyclic, giving a partial solution to a problem of Hedayat. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Combin Designs 15: 221–234, 2007     

Multiplicative infinite loop space theory

Let G be a finitely presented group given by its pre-abelian presentation <X1,…,Xm; Xe11ζ1,…,Xemmζ,ζm+1,…>, where ei≥0 for i = 1,…, m and ζj?G′ for j≥1. Let N be the subgroup of G generated by the normal subgroups [xeii, G] for i = 1,…, m. Then Dn+2(G)≡γn+2(G) (modNG′) for all n≥0, where G” is the second commutator subgroup of G,γn+2(G) is the (n+2)th term of the lower central series of G and Dn+2(G) = G∩(1+△n+2(G)) is the (n+2)th dimension subgroup of G.     

A matrix of permanents

If A is a matrix of order n×(n?2), n?3, denote by ā the n×n matrix whose (i,j)th entry is zero if i=j, and if i≠j, is the permanent of the submatrix of A obtained by deleting its ith and jth rows. It is shown that if A is a nonnegative n×(n?2) matrix, then ā is nonsingular if and only if A has no zero submatrix of n?1 lines. This is used to give precise consequences of the occurrence of equality in Alexandroff's inequality.     

Doubly diagonal orthogonal latin squares

A pair of doubly diagonal orthogonal latin squares of order n, DDOLS(n), is a pair of orthogonal latin squares of order n with the property that each square has a transversal on both the front diagonal (the cells {(i, i):1?i?n}) and the back diagonal (the cells {(i, n + 1?i): 1?i?n}). We show that for all n except n = 2, 3, 6, 10, 12, 14, 15, 18 and 26, there exists a pair of DDOLS(n). Obbviously these do not exist when n = 2, 3 and 6.     

Decomposable bilinear numerical radii

Let A be an n-square normal matrix over $\text{C}$, and Q_{m, n} be the set of strictly increasing integer sequences of length m chosen from 1,…, n. For α,β∈Q_{m, n} denote by A[α|β] the submatrix obtained from A by using rows numbered α and columns numbered β. For k∈{0,1,…,m} write z.sfnc;α∩β|=k if there exists a rearrangement of 1,…,m, say i₁,…,i_k, i_k+1,…,i_m, such that α(i_j)=β(i_j), j=1,…,k, and {α(i_k+1),…,α(i_m)};∩{β(i_k+1),…,β(i_m)}=ø. Let

be the group of n-square unitary matrices. Define the nonnegative number

$\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(A)=}\text{max}\text{U∈}\textcolor{red}{}\text{|}\text{det}\text{(U}{}^1\text{AU) [α|β]|}$

, where |α∩β|=k. Theorem 1 establishes a bound for ?_k(A), 0?k<m?1, in terms of a classical variational inequality due to Fermat. Let A be positive semidefinite Hermitian, n?2m. Theorem 2 leads to an interlacing inequality which, in the case n=4, m=2, resolves in the affirmative the conjecture that

$\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{m}}\text{(A)??}{}_{\mathrm{m?1}}\text{(A)????}{}_0\text{(A)}$

.     

On a characterization of irreducibility of a non-negative matrix

Let A denote an n×n matrix with all its elements real and non-negative, and let r_i be the sum of the elements in the ith row of A, i=1,…,n. Let B=A?D(r₁,…,r_n), where D(r₁,…,r_n) is the diagonal matrix with r_i at the position (i,i). Then it is proved that A is irreducible if and only if rank B=n?1 and the null space of B^T contains a vector d whose entries are all non-null.     

Symposium on combinatorial mathematics and optimal design

Let A₁,A₂,…,A_n be finite sets such that A_i?A_j for all i≠j. Let F be an intersecting family consisting of sets contained in some A_i, i=1,2,…,n. Chvátal conjectured that among the largest intersecting families, there is always a star. In this paper, we obtain another proof of a result of Schönheim: If A₁∩A₂∩?∩A_n≠?, then the conjecture is true. We also prove that if A_i∩A_jA_k = ? for all i≠j≠k≠i or if the independent system satisfies a hereditary tree structure, then the conjecture is also true.     

Fast canonization of circular strings

A circular string A = (a₁,…,a_n) is a string that has n equivalent linear representations A_i = a_i,…,a_n,a₁,…,a_i?1 for i = 1,…,n. The a_i's are assumed to be well ordered. We say that A_i < A_j if the word a_i…a_na₁…a_i?1 precedes the word a_j…a_na₁…a_j?1 in the lexicographic order, A_i ? A_j if either A_i < A_j or A_i = A_j. A_i0 is a minimal representation of A if A_i0 ? A_i for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n. The index i₀ is called a minimal starting point (m.s.p.). In this paper we discuss the problem of finding m.s.p. of a given circular string. Our algorithm finds, in fact, all the m.s.p.'s of a given circular string A of length n by using at most $\text{n + ?}\text{d}\text{2}\text{?}$ comparisons. The number d denotes the difference between two successive m.s.p.'s (see Lemma 1.1) and is equal to n if A has a unique m.s.p. Our algorithm improves the result of 3n comparisons given by K. S. Booth. Only constant auxiliary storage is used.     

Sign-nonsingular matrices and even cycles in directed graphs

A sign-nonsingular matrix or L-matrix A is a real m× n matrix such that the columns of any real m×n matrix with the same sign pattern as A are linearly independent. The problem of recognizing square L-matrices is equivalent to that of finding an even cycle in a directed graph. In this paper we use graph theoretic methods to investigate L-matrices. In particular, we determine the maximum number of nonzero elements in square L-matrices, and we characterize completely the semicomplete L-matrices [i.e. the square L-matrices (a_ij) such that at least one of a_ij and a_ij is nonzero for any i,j] and those square L-matrices which are combinatorially symmetric, i.e., the main diagonal has only nonzero entries and a_ij=0 iff a_ji=0. We also show that for any n×n L-matrix there is an i such that the total number of nonzero entries in the ith row and ith column is less than n unless the matrix has a completely specified structure. Finally, we discuss the algorithmic aspects.     

Extensions of band matrices with band inverses

Let R_ij be a given set of μ_i× μ_j matrices for i, j=1,…, n and |i?j| ?m, where 0?m?n?1. Necessary and sufficient conditions are established for the existence and uniqueness of an invertible block matrix =[F_ij], i,j=1,…, n, such that F_ij=R_ij for |i?j|?m, F admits either a left or right block triangular factorization, and (F^?1)_ij=0 for |i?j|>m. The well-known conditions for an invertible block matrix to admit a block triangular factorization emerge for the particular choice m=n?1. The special case in which the given R_ij are positive definite (in an appropriate sense) is explored in detail, and an inequality which corresponds to Burg's maximal entropy inequality in the theory of covariance extension is deduced. The block Toeplitz case is also studied.     

Upper triangular operator matrices with the single-valued extension property

If A=(Aij)_1?i,j?n∈B(X) is an upper triangular Banach space operator such that AiiAij=AijAjj for all 1?i?j?n, then A has SVEP or satisfies (Dunford's) condition (C) or (Bishop's) property (β) or (the decomposition) property (δ) if and only if Aii, 1?i?n, has the corresponding property.     

Construction of a Jacobi matrix from spectral data

A proof is given for the existence and uniqueness of a correspondence between two pairs of sequences {a},{b} and {ω},{μ}, satisfying b_i>0 for i=1,…,n?1 and ω₁<μ₁<?<μ_n?1<ω_n, under which the symmetric Jacobi matrices J(n,a,b) and J(n?1,a,b) have eigenvalues {ω} and {μ} respectively. Here J(m,a,b) is symmetric and tridiagonal with diagonal elements a_i (i=1,…,m) and off diagonal elements b_i (i=1,…,m?1). A new concise proof is given for the known uniqueness result. The existence result is new.     

A subdeterminant inequality for normal matrices

Let A be an n × n normal matrix over $\text{C}$, and Q_m, _n be the set of strictly increasing integer sequences of length m chosen from 1,…,n. For α, β ? Q_m, _n denote by A[α|β] the submatrix obtained from A by using rows numbered α and columns numbered β. For k ? {0, 1,…, m} we write |α∩β| = k if there exists a rearrangement of 1,…, m, say i₁,…, i_k, i_k+1,…, i_m, such that α(i_j) = β(i_j), i = 1,…, k, and {α(i_k+1),…, α(i_m) } ∩ {β(i_k+1),…, β(i_m) } = ?. A new bound for |detA[α|β ]| is obtained in terms of the eigenvalues of A when 2m = n and |α∩β| = 0.Let $\text{U}$_n be the group of n × n unitary matrices. Define the nonnegative number

where | α ∩ β| = k. It is proved that

Let A be semidefinite hermitian. We conjecture that ρ₀(A) ? ρ₁(A) ? ··· ? ρ_m(A). These inequalities have been tested by machine calculations.     

Continuity properties of the Drazin pseudoinverse

Let B^D denote that Drazin inverse of the n×n complex matrix B. Define the core-rank of B as rank (B^i(B)) where i(B) is the index of B. Let j = 1,2,…, and A_j and A be square matrices such that A_i converges to A with respect to some norm. The main result of this paper is that A_j^D converges to A^D if and only if there exist a j₀ such that core-rank A_j=core-rankA for j ? j₀.     

Sperner systems consisting of pairs of complementary subsets

It was proved by Erdös, Ko, and Radó (Intersection theorems for systems of finite sets, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser.12 (1961), 313–320.) that if $\text{A}$ = {;A₁,…, A_l}; consists of k-subsets of a set with n > 2k elements such that A_i ∩ A_j ≠ ? for all i, j then l ? (_k?1^n?1). Schönheim proved that if A₁, …, A_l are subsets of a set S with n elements such that A_i ? A_j, A_i ∩ A_j ≠ ø and A_i ∪ A_j ≠ S for all i ≠ j then $\text{l ? (}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>[</mtext><mtext>n</mtext><mtext>2</mtext><mtext>]\; ?\; 1</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}\text{)}$. In this note we prove a common strengthening of these results.     

Langford sequences: perfect and hooked

A sequence {d, d+1,…, d+m?1} of m consecutive positive integers is said to be perfect if the integers {1, 2,…, 2m} can be arranged in disjoint pairs {(a_i, b_i): 1?i?m} so that {b_i?a_i: 1?i?m}={d,d+1,…,d+m?1}. A sequence is hooked if the set {1, 2,…, 2m?1 2m+1} can be arranged in pairs to satisfy the same condition. Well known necessary conditions for perfect sequences are herein shown to be sufficient. Similar necessary and sufficient conditions for hooked sequences are given.