Metrology in chemistry: Part II. Future requirements in Europe

 The paper (Parts I and II) reports the results of a survey carried out to assess the current situation in the field of metrology in chemistry within Europe and to identify future needs for work at the European level. Responses to a questionnaire covering 17 economic sectors and distributed to 17 countries plus the European Commission Joint Research Centre (EC JRC), together with input from a project group, EURACHEM and EUROMET, provided the basis of the study. Part I covers the protocol for the study and reports current activities. Part II reports suggestions for future work, a strategy for metrology in chemistry and recommendations for the EC Fifth Framework Programme.     

The establishment of an Australian National Analytical Reference Laboratory (NARL)

 The National Analytical Reference Laboratory (NARL) was established by the Commonwealth Government within the Australian Government Analytical Laboratories (AGAL) Public Interest Programme in 1997, to help provide Australian scientists with the chemical standards they need to make reliable measurements. Reliable chemical measurements are vital to many aspects of our social and economic life including public health, environmental control, industrial productivity, trade innovation and government regulation. Mutual recognition of measurement results and the avoidance of costly disputes require the development of a structured and common system of measurement. Working-level measurements should be directly linked to national standards, which are themselves interlinked through international comparisons. Although metrology in chemistry is still in its infancy, increasing numbers of countries are establishing facilities to serve both national needs and to contribute to the international measurement system. The aim at NARL is to lead the development of an Australian chemical measurement system, which is harmonized with similar systems in other countries. This paper was presented at the Co-operation on Traceability in Analytical Chemistry (CITAC) symposium on Analytical Quality Assurance for the Twenty-first Century, held in Sydney on 15–16 October 1998. It describes the rationale for establishing NARL, the process of getting it started, the positioning, aims and strategy of NARL, the development of its work programme and plans for both national and international collaboration. If you would like more information or would like to contribute to the work of NARL please contact us at the above address.     

Traceability in measurement – time for an update?

 The present international definition of "traceability" is discussed and suggestions are made for a possible refinement of the definition.     

Traceability of (values carried by) reference materials

 Traceability is a property of the result of a measurement. Since values carried by (reference) materials must also have been obtained, of necessity, by measurement, the definition of traceability also applies to reference materials. It is extremely helpful to give the traceability (of the origin) of a reference material a separate name, i.e. 'trackability'. An analysis of the function of values carried by reference materials, shows that they can fulfill different functions, depending on the intended use. One of the functions located outside the traceability chain – and hence not very relevant for establishing traceability – is evaluating the approximate size of the uncertainty of the measurement of an unknown sample by performing a similar measurement on a reference material, used as a 'simulated sample'. Another function is located inside the traceability chain, where the reference material is used as an added 'internal standard'. Then, the value carried by the reference material is essential for establishing the traceability of the measured value of an unknown sample. In the latter application, the reference material acts as an 'amount standard' (the certified value for amount is used). Received: 11 November 1999 / Accepted: 24 February 2000     

Traceability and analytical chemistry

 The basic concepts of traceability as they are defined by the Comité Consultatif pour la Cluantité de Matière are contrasted with the practical exploitation in chemical analysis. The applicability of traceability concepts are tested for their practical applicability on four different analytical methodologies, neutron activation analysis, plasma mass spectrometry, beam microscopical analysis and speciation analysis of organometallic compounds. Received: 31 March 1998 · Accepted: 6 June 1998     

A participatory improvement activity of the EC-JRC to improve metrology in chemistry in EU candidate countries

In 2000, the European Commission-Joint Research Centre, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (EC-JRC-IRMM) set up a project to improve the scientific basis for metrology in chemistry (MiC) in EU candidate countries. Several activities were initiated (training, fellowships, sponsoring seminars, conferences and participation in the International Measurement Evaluation Programme – IMEP). A particular initiative, discussed here, was to assist each of the national measurement institutes of these countries to write a status report on MiC. Most importantly, the report was intended to be the end-product of a process to document the current status of MiC. Intentionally, this process involved not only the providers of services in MiC but all the major stakeholders in this activity (e.g. major field laboratories, accreditation bodies, regulatory bodies, educators, professional bodies). The status reports are intended to be the first step of the future improvement process. In those countries where writing of the status reports has been started (Slovenia, Poland, Bulgaria and Estonia) the first signs are that this process leads to better co-operation and particularly a better understanding of what the future role and activities of each of these stakeholders should be. Correspondence to N. Majcen     

Some recent developments in reference methodology within the United Kingdom

 The UK Valid Analytical Measurement Programme has pump-primed developments in chemical metrology, through a major project on reference methodology and reference materials. This paper provides an overview of developments during 1994–1997 and covers work on primary methods for trace inorganic and trace organic analysis, including the use of isotope dilution mass spectrometry; studies of sample pre-treatment, including digestion, extraction, and separation aimed at improving this weak link in the traceability chain; prioritisation, production and marketing of both pure substance and matrix reference materials; and international collaboration concerned with interlaboratory comparisons and the development of concepts, terminology and systems to underpin the international chemical measurement system. References are given to a number of papers covering specific parts of the programme. Received: 5 August 1998 · Accepted: 12 September 1998     

Calibration uncertainty

Methods recommended by the International Standardization Organisation and Eurachem are not satisfactory for the correct estimation of calibration uncertainty. A novel approach is introduced and tested on actual calibration data for the determination of Pb by ICP-AES. The improved calibration uncertainty was verified from independent measurements of the same sample by demonstrating statistical control of analytical results and the absence of bias. The proposed method takes into account uncertainties of the measurement, as well as of the amount of calibrant. It is applicable to all types of calibration data, including cases where linearity can be assumed only over a limited range. Received: 25 August 2001 Accepted: 21 December 2001     

Chemical measurement and the law: metrology and quality issues

To facilitate just and sound decisions legal measurements must be reliable. The aim of this paper is to explore how this is currently achieved and how it might be better done. It considers the different types of legal proceedings, the role of chemical measurement, level of proof, the different types of chemical measurement, measurement units, the role of government, the chemical measurement industry and its control, legal metrology and the development of a measurement system based on metrological principles. It is argued that recent developments provide the basis for a robust support system, that but more needs to be done. It is also argued that the conventional approach to legal metrology has little place in chemical measurement, but that some controls are needed in some areas. In particular, a harmonised approach to international measurement standards is advocated. Received: 29 December 2000 Accepted: 8 January 2001     

Uncertainty – The key topic of metrology in chemistry

 At the Second EURACHEM Workshop on Measurement Uncertainty in Chemical Analysis the author had the pleasure of chairing a working group on chemical metrology. This note presents some propositions arising from the preparation of, as well as from the discussion at and after, the working group session. Received: 29 October 1997 · Accepted: 26 November 1997     

A framework for the application and materials in analytical chemistry

 Working group 5 of EuraChem Nederland has developed a framework for the implementation of reference materials in analytical chemistry. In this discussed paper, the framework is proposed as a tool for the development of standard operation procedures (SOPs) in laboratories. The implementation of (certified) reference materials in these SOPs is of major importance in establishing comparability and traceability in measurement results, which in turn play a crucial role in measurement in support of trade, environmental issues, and characterisation of materials. Recent developments in the field of uncertainty analysis require the application of reference materials. It is recognised that the calculation of the combined measurement uncertainty becomes almost impossible without the use of certified reference materials with a stated uncertainty. Received: 1 December 1995 Accepted: 20 December 1995     

A need for clearer terminology and guidance in the role of reference materials in method development and validation

 The fact that various definitions and terminology applied to measurements in analytical chemistry are not always consistent and straightforward, by not only answering the question ”what”, but also ”how”, leads to their various interpretations. This results in non-uniform implementation of very basic and essential metrological principles in chemistry. Such a diverse situation is not conducive to the endorsement of harmonised measurements all across the world, to serve as a tool for improving the quality of life in its broadest sense for all its citizens. The discussion in this paper is focused on problems associated with terminology and definitions of ’reference material’ and ’validation’. The role of reference materials in measurement processes for purposes other than calibration and validation principles in analytical chemistry are also discussed in this paper. Where possible, potential solutions are proposed, but more often, questions of essential importance are raised in order to initiate international discussion which will hopefully lead to equally understandable answers. Received: 2 November 2002 Accepted: 3 February 2003 Acknowledgements   The author is grateful to Aleš Fajgelj for his comprehensive comments on the topic described in this paper. Sincere thanks also to Philip Taylor, Ewa Bulska, Emilia Vassileva, Miloslav Suchanek and Margreet Lauwaars for their contribution during fruitful discussions on validation. Presented at the CERMM-3, Central European Reference Materials and Measurements Conference: The function of reference materials in the measurement process, May 30–June 1, 2002, Rogaška Slatina, Slovenia Correspondence to N. Majcen     

The sixth meeting of CCQM, April 2000

A report is given of the sixth meeting of the Consultative Committee on Amount of Substance (CCQM). The CCQM has been active since 1993. It is the committee, established by the Comite International des Poids et Mesures, which is responsible for issues regarding metrology in chemistry. It has four established working groups in the fields of organic analysis, inorganic analysis, gas analysis and electrochemical analysis. A further twoad hoc working groups in the fields of surface analysis and metrology in biotechnology were established during the meeting. The working groups are involved in the identification, development and execution of a series of key comparisons, which will establish the technical basis for the mutual recognition of measurement capabilities among the National Measurement Institutes. 17 key comparisons are currently planned for the period 1999–2002, with 29 other international comparisons planned for the same period.     

Global comparability of analytical results

 Global decisions made on the basis of chemical analytical results need global comparability. The concept of traceability is important and necessary but not sufficient to achieve global comparability, especially for routine analysis in environmental protection, health care and public safety. Sometimes comparability is only determined by the method. In this case validated methods have to be known and recognized internationally. In addition, a minimum level of proficiency of the personnel producing analytical results has to be guaranteed. Finally, a system of measures designed to build up trust is needed for worldwide acceptance of analytical results. The method of self-declaration by the supplier of chemical analytical services has the advantage of presenting specific responsibility and gaining a good reputation. Additional methods should be employed. The evaluation of reference materials by specific quality criteria is mentioned as an example. Received: 1 July 1998 · Accepted: 20 July 1998     

Derived measurement standards of reduced uncertainty – A contradiction?

 If the value of a derived measurement standard is assigned by comparison with a reference standard of the same quantity, the uncertainty is increased by the additional uncertainty on the difference measurement. This basic fact has lead to the general belief that the uncertainty of derived standards is always larger than that of the reference standards. However, if the value of a derived standard is assigned by comparison with several independent reference standards using an appropriate average, the increase of uncertainty due to the uncertainty on difference measurement may be counterbalanced by the the well-known decrease of uncertainty through averaging. The gain of accuracy made possible by this mechanism is restricted to second-generation standards. Further gain through iteration is prevented by correlation between standards derived from the same set of reference standards. As a consequence, the concept of metrological hierarchy levels, relating to traceability chains, becomes questionable for traceability networks.     

Traceable property values of in-house reference materials

The traceability of in-house reference materials (IHRM) is discussed. It is shown that a systematic error in results of a measured value, specific to a measurement method or to a laboratory developing an IHRM, can be overcome if a comparative approach to IHRM characterization is used. A traceability chain of the value carried by the IHRM to the value carried by the reference material with higher metrological status and sufficiently similar matrix (for example, a certified reference material – CRM according to ISO Guide 30) is helpful in such a case. The chain is realized when the IHRM samples are analysed simultaneously with the CRM samples under the same conditions. This and other traceability chains necessary for the IHRM development are examined as the measurement information sources.     

Relationship between performance characteristics obtained from an interlaboratory study programme and combined measurement uncertainty: a case study

 In the interlaboratory study programme "ILS Coal Characterisation", eight interlaboratory studies were organised based on the ISO standards for coal analysis. The use of blind samples in each round allows comparability of measurement results between rounds to be assessed. Based on the results, it could be demonstrated that the vast majority of the measurement results of the laboratories were traceable to results obtained in previous rounds of this programme. The hypothesis has been formulated that the combined standard uncertainty obtained from an interlaboratory study is equal to the reproducibility standard deviation. Whether the reproducibility can be used as the basis for the certification depends on whether the interlaboratory study includes all effects to be taken into account for establishing an uncertainty statement. Received: 12 April 1998 · Accepted: 2 July 1998     

Reference procedures for testing and chemical analysis provided by BAM

Recently the German Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM) has made an inventory of the reference procedures for testing and chemical analysis provided by its laboratories. This compilation was first published as a printed catalogue [1] but is now also available on the Internet at the BAM website (see http://www.bam.de/service, direct link: http://www.bam.de/ reference_procedures.htm). The intention of this article is to give an introduction to the catalogue and provide relevant background information.