Derivation of intuitionistic fuzzy weights based on intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations

This paper proposes linear goal programming models for deriving intuitionistic fuzzy weights from intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Novel definitions are put forward to define additive consistency and weak transitivity for intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, followed by a study of their corresponding properties. For any given normalized intuitionistic fuzzy weight vector, a transformation formula is furnished to convert the weights into a consistent intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation. For any intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation, a linear goal programming model is developed to obtain its intuitionistic fuzzy weights by minimizing its deviation from the converted consistent intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation. This approach is then extended to group decision-making situations. Three numerical examples are provided to illustrate the validity and applicability of the proposed models.     

Total domination dot-stable graphs

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. Two vertices of G are said to be dotted (identified) if they are combined to form one vertex whose open neighborhood is the union of their neighborhoods minus themselves. We note that dotting any pair of vertices cannot increase the total domination number. Further we show it can decrease the total domination number by at most 2. A graph is total domination dot-stable if dotting any pair of adjacent vertices leaves the total domination number unchanged. We characterize the total domination dot-stable graphs and give a sharp upper bound on their total domination number. We also characterize the graphs attaining this bound.     

Secure domination critical graphs

A secure dominating set X of a graph G is a dominating set with the property that each vertex u∈V_G−X is adjacent to a vertex v∈X such that (X−{v})∪{u} is dominating. The minimum cardinality of such a set is called the secure domination number, denoted by γ_s(G). We are interested in the effect of edge removal on γ_s(G), and characterize γ_s-ER-critical graphs, i.e. graphs for which γ_s(G−e)>γ_s(G) for any edge e of G, bipartite γ_s-ER-critical graphs and γ_s-ER-critical trees.     

Power domination in graphs

The problem of monitoring an electric power system by placing as few measurement devices in the system as possible is closely related to the well-known domination problem in graphs. In 1998, Haynes et al. considered the graph theoretical representation of this problem as a variation of the domination problem. They defined a set S to be a power dominating set of a graph if every vertex and every edge in the system is monitored by the set S (following a set of rules for power system monitoring). The power domination number γ_P(G) of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of a power dominating set of G. In this paper, we present upper bounds on the power domination number for a connected graph with at least three vertices and a connected claw-free cubic graph in terms of their order. The extremal graphs attaining the upper bounds are also characterized.     

Vertex-edge domination in graphs

In this paper we study graph parameters related to vertex-edge domination, where a vertex dominates the edges incident to it as well as the edges adjacent to these incident edges. First, we present new relationships relating the ve-domination to some other domination parameters, answering in the affirmative four open questions posed in the 2007 PhD thesis by Lewis. Then we provide an upper bound for the independent ve-domination number in terms of the ve-domination number for every nontrivial connected K_1,k-free graph, with k ≥ 3, and we show that the independent ve-domination number is bounded above by the domination number for every nontrivial tree. Finally, we establish an upper bound on the ve-domination number for connected C₅-free graphs, improving a recent bound given for trees.     

Remarks on restrained domination and total restrained domination in graphs

The restrained domination number ^r(G) and the total restrained domination number _t ^r (G) of a graph G were introduced recently by various authors as certain variants of the domination number (G) of (G). A well-known numerical invariant of a graph is the domatic number d(G) which is in a certain way related (and may be called dual) to (G). The paper tries to define analogous concepts also for the restrained domination and the total restrained domination and discusses the sense of such new definitions.This research was supported by Grant MSM 245100303 of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic.     

Set domination in graphs

Let G = (V, E) be a connected graph. A set D ? V is a set-dominating set (sd-set) if for every set T ? V ? D, there exists a nonempty set S ? D such that the subgraph 〈S ∪ T〉 induced by S ∪ T is connected. The set-domination number γ_s(G) of G is the minimum cardinality of a sd-set. In this paper we develop properties of this new parameter and relate it to some other known domination parameters.     

Line domination in graphs

A setS of lines is a line dominating set if every line not inS is adjacent to some line ofS. The line domination number of a graph is the cardinality of a minimum line dominating set. In this paper we study the line dominating sets and obtain bounds for the line domination number. Also, Nordhaus-Gaddum type results are obtained for the line domination number and the line domatic number.     

Vertex-edge domination in graphs

Aequationes mathematicae - We establish that for any connected graph G of order $$n \ge 6$$ , a minimum vertex-edge dominating set of G has at most n/3 vertices, thus affirmatively answering the...     

On global domination critical graphs

A dominating set of a graph G=(V,E) is a subset S⊆V such that every vertex not in S is adjacent to at least one vertex of S. The domination number of G is the cardinality of a smallest dominating set. The global domination number, γ_g(G), is the cardinality of a smallest set S that is simultaneously a dominating set of both G and its complement . Graphs for which γ_g(G−e)>γ_g(G) for all edges e∈E are characterized, as are graphs for which γ_g(G−e)<γ_g(G) for all edges e∈E whenever is disconnected. Progress is reported in the latter case when is connected.     

Minus total domination in graphs

A three-valued function f: V → {−1, 0, 1} defined on the vertices of a graph G= (V, E) is a minus total dominating function (MTDF) if the sum of its function values over any open neighborhood is at least one. That is, for every υ ∈ V, f(N(υ)) ⩾ 1, where N(υ) consists of every vertex adjacent to υ. The weight of an MTDF is f(V) = Σf(υ), over all vertices υ ∈ V. The minus total domination number of a graph G, denoted γ _t ⁻(G), equals the minimum weight of an MTDF of G. In this paper, we discuss some properties of minus total domination on a graph G and obtain a few lower bounds for γ _t ⁻(G).     

Independent domination in chordal graphs

A graph chordal if it does not contain any cycle of length greater than three as an induced subgraph. A set of S of vertices of a graph G = (V,E) is independent if not two vertices in S are adjacent, and is dominating if every vertex in V?S is adjacent to some vertex in S. We present a linear algorithm to locate a minimum weight independent dominating set in a chordal graph with 0–1 vertex weights.     

A note on the domination dot-critical graphs

A graph G is dot-critical if contracting any edge decreases the domination number. Nader Jafari Rad (2009) [3] posed the problem: Is it true that a connected k-dot-critical graph G with G^′=0? is 2-connected? In this note, we give a family of 1-connected 2k-dot-critical graph with G^′=0? and show that this problem has a negative answer.     

Independent domination in triangle-free graphs

Let G be a simple graph of order n and minimum degree δ. The independent domination numberi(G) is defined to be the minimum cardinality among all maximal independent sets of vertices of G. We establish upper bounds, as functions of n and δ?n/2, for the independent domination number of triangle-free graphs, and over part of the range achieve best possible results.     

Roman domination in regular graphs

A Roman domination function on a graph G=(V(G),E(G)) is a function f:V(G)→{0,1,2} satisfying the condition that every vertex u for which f(u)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f(v)=2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the value f(V(G))=∑_u∈V(G)f(u). The minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on a graph G is called the Roman domination number of G. Cockayne et al. [E. J. Cockayne et al. Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Mathematics 278 (2004) 11-22] showed that γ(G)≤γ_R(G)≤2γ(G) and defined a graph G to be Roman if γ_R(G)=2γ(G). In this article, the authors gave several classes of Roman graphs: P_3k,P_3k+2,C_3k,C_3k+2 for k≥1, K_m,n for min{m,n}≠2, and any graph G with γ(G)=1; In this paper, we research on regular Roman graphs and prove that: (1) the circulant graphs and , n⁄≡1 (mod (2k+1)), (n≠2k) are Roman graphs, (2) the generalized Petersen graphs P(n,2k+1)( (mod 4) and ), P(n,1) (n⁄≡2 (mod 4)), P(n,3) ( (mod 4)) and P(11,3) are Roman graphs, and (3) the Cartesian product graphs are Roman graphs.