Synthesis and Study of Cationic,Two‐Coordinate Triphenylphosphine– Gold–π Complexes

Cationic, two‐coordinate triphenylphosphine–gold(I)–π complexes of the form [(PPh₃)Au(π ligand)]⁺ SbF₆^? (π ligand=4‐methylstyrene, 1? SbF₆), 2‐methyl‐2‐butene ( 3? SbF₆), 3‐hexyne ( 6? SbF₆), 1,3‐cyclohexadiene ( 7? SbF₆), 3‐methyl‐1,2‐butadiene ( 8? SbF₆), and 1,7‐diphenyl‐3,4‐heptadiene ( 10? SbF₆) were generated in situ from reaction of [(PPh₃)AuCl], AgSbF₆, and π ligand at ?78 °C and were characterized by low‐temperature, multinuclear NMR spectroscopy without isolation. The π ligands of these complexes were both weakly bound and kinetically labile and underwent facile intermolecular exchange with free ligand (ΔG^≠≈9 kcal mol^?1 in the case of 6? SbF₆) and competitive displacement by weak σ donors, such as trifluoromethane sulfonate. Triphenylphosphine–gold(I)–π complexes were thermally unstable and decomposed above ?20 °C to form the bis(triphenylphosphine) gold cation [(PPh₃)₂Au]⁺SbF₆^? ( 2? SbF₆).     

Platinum Oxoboryl Complexes as Substrates for the Formation of 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1 Lewis Acid–Base Adducts and 1,2‐Dipolar Additions

The oxoboryl complex trans‐[(Cy₃P)₂BrPt(B?O)] ( 2 ) reacts with the Group 13 Lewis acids EBr₃ (E=Al, Ga, In) to form the 1:1 Lewis acid–base adducts trans‐[(Cy₃P)₂BrPt(B?OEBr₃)] ( 6 – 8 ). This reactivity can be extended by using two equivalents of the respective Lewis acid EBr₃ (E=Al, Ga) to form the 2:1 Lewis acid–base adducts trans‐[(Cy₃P)₂(Br₃Al‐Br)Pt(B?OAlBr₃)] ( 18 ) and trans‐[(Cy₃P)₂(Br₃Ga‐Br)Pt(B?OGaBr₃)] ( 15 ). Another reactivity pattern was demonstrated by coordinating two oxoboryl complexes 2 to InBr₃, forming the 1:2 Lewis acid–base adduct trans‐[{(Cy₃P)₂BrPt(B?O)}₂InBr₃] ( 20 ). It was also possible to functionalize the B?O triple bond itself. Trimethylsilylisothiocyanate reacts with 2 in a 1,2‐dipolar addition to form the boryl complex trans‐[(Cy₃P)₂BrPt{B(NCS)(OSiMe₃)}] ( 27 ).     

Tandem Gold Self‐Relay Catalysis for the Synthesis of 2,3‐Dihydropyridin‐4(1 H)‐ones: Combination of σ and π Lewis Acid Properties of Gold Salts

The dual ability of gold salts to act as π‐ and σ Lewis acids has been exploited in a tandem self‐relay catalysis. Thus, triphenylphosphanegold(I) triflate mediated the intramolecular carbonyl addition of the amide functionality of homoprogargyl amides to a triple bond. The formation of a σ complex of the gold salt with the intermediate oxazine promoted a nucleophilic addition followed by a Petasis–Ferrier rearrangement. This tandem protocol, catalyzed by the same gold salt under the same reaction conditions, gave rise to the efficient synthesis of 2,3‐dihydropyridin‐4‐(1 H)‐ones, which contain a cyclic quaternary α‐amino acid unit. The asymmetric version was performed by generating the starting materials from the corresponding sulfinylimines.     

Synthesis, π‐Face‐Selective Aggregation,and π‐Face Chiral Recognition of Configurationally Stable C3‐Symmetric Propeller‐Chiral Molecules with a π‐Core

The C₃‐symmetric propeller‐chiral compounds (P,P,P)‐ 1 and (M,M,M)‐ 1 with planar π‐cores perpendicular to the C₃‐axis were synthesized in optically pure states. (P,P,P)‐ 1 possesses two distinguishable propeller‐chiral π‐faces with rims of different heights named the (P/L)‐face and (P/H)‐face. Each face is configurationally stable because of the rigid structure of the helicenes contained in the π‐core. (P,P,P)‐ 1 formed dimeric aggregates in organic solutions as indicated by the results of ¹H NMR, CD, and UV/Vis spectroscopy and vapor pressure osmometry analyses. The (P/L)/(P/L) interactions were observed in the solid state by single‐crystal X‐ray analysis, and they were also predominant over the (P/H)/(P/H) and (P/L)/(P/H) interactions in solution, as indicated by the results of ¹H and 2D NMR spectroscopy analyses. The dimerization constant was obtained for a racemic mixture, which showed that the heterochiral (P,P,P)‐ 1 /(M,M,M)‐ 1 interactions were much weaker than the homochiral (P,P,P)‐ 1 /(P,P,P)‐ 1 interactions. The results indicated that the propeller‐chiral (P/L)‐face interacts with the (P/L)‐face more strongly than with the (P/H)‐face, (M/L)‐face, and (M/H)‐face. The study showed the π‐face‐selective aggregation and π‐face chiral recognition of the configurationally stable propeller‐chiral molecules.     

Transition Metal Free Chemoselective Reduction of α,β‐Unsaturated Ketones to Saturated Ketones Using Tosyl Hydrazide as a Hydrogen Donor

An efficient, inexpensive and simple method for the reduction of various α,β‐unsaturated ketones to corresponding saturated ketones using tosyl hydrazide as a hydrogen donor in DMF using calcium oxide powder has been reported. A variety of enones underwent reduction without forming undesirable side products. High chemoselectivity, broad functional group tolerance and good yields are the noteworthy features of this protocol.     

Asymmetric Reduction of α‐Amino Ketones with a KBH4 Solution Catalyzed by Chiral Lewis Acids

An efficient enantioselective reduction of α‐amino ketones with potassium borohydride solution catalyzed by chiral N,N′‐dioxide–metal complex catalysts was accomplished under mild reaction conditions for the first time. It provided a simple, convenient, and practical approaches for obtaining synthetically important chiral β‐amino alcohols in good to excellent yields (up to 98 %) and enantioselectivities (up to 97 % ee).     

Organometallic Lewis Acids,Part LXII. Chiral Carbonyl‐Cyclopentadienyl‐Triphenylphosphine‐Iron and ‐Ruthenium Complexes with Tertiary Nitriles [CpM(CO)(PPh3)(N≡C–CR1R2R3)]+ BF4– (M = Fe,Ru)

A series of tertiary nitriles was synthesized by alkylation of acetonitrile, primary and secondary nitriles, using alkylbromides and sodium amide in liquid ammonia. By reaction of the in situ formed organometallic Lewis acids [CpM(CO)(PPh₃)]⁺ (M = Fe, Ru) with the novel tertiary nitriles, the complexes [CpM(CO)(PPh₃)(N≡C–CR¹R²R³]BF₄ were obtained. A di‐iron complex was formed with 1,6‐dicyanohexane.     

3,4,5,6-四氟邻苯二甲酸与含氮配体的过渡金属配合物的合成、晶体结构及对Fe~(3+)的荧光传感

利用过渡金属盐与3,4,5,6-四氟邻苯二甲酸(H2TFPT)、1,3-二(4-吡啶基)-丙烷(DPP)和1,4-二(1,2,4-三氮唑)-1-丁烷(BTB)经水热法合成了3个新的配合物:{[M(TFPT)(DPP)]·H2O}n(M=Cd(1),Ni(2)),{[Cd(TFPT)(BTB)0.5]·2H_2O}n(3)。通过X射线单晶衍射分析测定了它们的结构。配合物1和2具有相似的一维链结构。中心金属离子表现为扭曲的[MO4N2]八面体构型。配合物3具有二维结构。中心金属离子表现为扭曲的[CdO5N]八面体构型。配合物1和3分别在424 nm、442 nm处出现来自于配体的荧光发射,对应于配体的π*-π的跃迁,配合物2在356 nm处有非常弱的荧光发射。不同金属阳离子对配合物1和3的荧光强度有不同程度的影响,并且通过荧光的猝灭机理,它们都能选择性检测Fe~(3+)离子。     

Review: Chemistry of the phosphinophosphinidene tBu2P?P,a novel π‐electron ligand

In reactions with transition metal compounds, ^tBu₂P? P?P(X)^tBu₂ (X = Br, Me) acts mainly as a precursor of the ^tBu₂P? P ligand, whereas ^tBu(Me₃Si)P? P?P(Me)^tBu₂ acts as a precursor of the (Me₃Si)P?P^tBu ligand. Up to now, only Pt(0) d¹⁰ ML₂ metal centres were found to be able to stabilize the ^tBu₂P? P group in ‘pure form’ by means of η²‐coordination (side on). Several compounds of the [{η² ? ^tBu₂P? P}Pt(PR₃)₂] type were sufficiently stable to be isolated and characterized; however, not all of them gave single crystals suitable for X‐ray structure determinations. The X‐ray structures of these compounds and of [{µ ? (1,2:2 ? η ? ^tBu₂P? P)Pt(PR₃)₂} {M(CO)₅}] strongly suggest the ethene‐like form of 1,1‐di‐tert‐butyldiphosphene in these complexes. Such a form is also in agreement with RI DFT calculations with SVP basis for free ^tBu₂P? P. However, in trapping experiments with cyclic olefins and cyclic dienes ^tBu₂P? P exhibits, to some extent, electrophilic ‘singlet carbene’ properties. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Transition Metal Complexes with more than one Dihydrogen Ligand: Structure and Bonding of M(CO)6–x(H2)x (M = Cr,Mo, W; x = 1, 2, 3) [1]

Quantum mechanical ab initio calculations at the MP2 and CCSD(T) level of theory have been used to investigate the geometries and bond energies of the complexes M(CO)_6–x(H₂)_x (M = Cr, Mo, W; x = 1, 2, 3). The theoretically predicted M(CO)₅–(H₂) bond dissociation energies are in excellent agreement with experimental values. The M–(H₂) dissociation energies of the bis- and tris-dihydrogen complexes are very similar to the values for the mono-dihydrogen complexes. In M(CO)₅(H₂) the dihydrogen ligand prefers an eclipsed conformation relative to the equatorial carbonyl groups. For M(CO)₄(H₂)₂ the cis and trans isomers are nearly equal in energy for M = W, while a cis configuration is favoured for M = Cr. For M(CO)₃(H₂)₃ the facial configurations are more stable than the meridial structures for all three metals M. The charge decomposition analysis (CDA) classifies dihydrogen as a donor ligand with moderate acceptor properties. In trans-M(CO)₄(H₂)₂ back donation is increased and the M–(H₂) bonds are stronger than in M(CO)₅–(H₂). Back donation in M(CO)₃(H₂)₃ is slightly weaker than in the mono-dihydrogen complexes M(CO)₅(H₂).