(Z)‐3‐(1H‐Indol‐3‐yl)‐2‐(3‐thienyl)­acrylo­nitrile and (Z)‐3‐[1‐(4‐tert‐butyl­benzyl)‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl]‐2‐(3‐thienyl)­acrylo­nitrile

(Z)‐3‐(1H‐Indol‐3‐yl)‐2‐(3‐thienyl)­acrylo­nitrile, C₁₅H₁₀N₂S, (I), and (Z)‐3‐[1‐(4‐tert‐butyl­benzyl)‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl]‐2‐(3‐thienyl)­acrylo­nitrile, C₂₆H₂₄N₂S, (II), were prepared by base‐catalyzed reactions of the corresponding indole‐3‐carbox­aldehyde with thio­phene‐3‐aceto­nitrile. ¹H/¹³C NMR spectral data and X‐ray crystal structures of compounds (I) and (II) are presented. The olefinic bond connecting the indole and thio­phene moieties has Z geometry in both cases, and the mol­ecules crystallize in space groups P2₁/c and C2/c for (I) and (II), respectively. Slight thienyl ring‐flip disorder (ca 5.6%) was observed and modeled for (I).     

FeCl3-Mediated Reaction of 1,4-Dilithio-1,3-dienes with Alkynes Affording Benzene Derivatives

Unactivated alkynes reacted with 1,4-dilithio-1,3-diene derivatives in the presence of FeCl3 affording substituted benzene derivatives via a formal[4 2] cycloaddition.     

Highly para‐Selective C−H Alkylation of Benzene Derivatives with 2,2,2‐Trifluoroethyl α‐Aryl‐α‐Diazoesters

Compared to the most popular directing‐group‐assisted strategy, the “undirected” strategy for C−H bond functionalization represents a more flexible but more challenging approach. Reported herein is a gold‐catalyzed highly site‐selective C(sp²)−H alkylation of unactivated arenes with 2,2,2‐trifluoroethyl α‐aryl‐α‐diazoesters. This protocol demonstrates that high site‐selective C−H bond functionalization can be achieved without the assistance of a directing group. In this transformation, both the gold catalyst and trifluoroethyl group on the ester of the diazo compound play vital roles for achieving the chemo‐ and regioselectivity.     

Ethyl 2‐form­amido‐2‐(4‐iodo­benzyl)‐3‐(4‐iodo­phenyl)­propionate and ethyl 2‐(3‐bromo­benzyl)‐3‐(3‐bromo­phenyl)‐2‐form­amidopropionate

The title compounds, C₁₉H₁₉I₂NO₃ and C₁₉H₁₉Br₂NO₃, are derivatives of α‐amino­isobutyric acid with halogen substituents at the para and meta positions, respectively. The ethoxycarbonyl and formamide side chains attached to the C_α atom of the mol­ecule adopt extended and folded conformations, respectively. The crystal structures are stabilized by N—H⃛O, C—H⃛O, C—Br⃛O and C—I⃛O interactions.     

3‐Deoxy‐β‐d‐ribo‐hexopyranose (3‐deoxy‐β‐d‐glucopyranose)

The β‐pyranose form, (III), of 3‐deoxy‐d ‐ribo‐hexose (3‐deoxy‐d ‐glucose), C₆H₁₂O₅, crystallizes from water at 298 K in a slightly distorted ⁴C₁ chair conformation. Structural analyses of (III), β‐d ‐glucopyranose, (IV), and 2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐arabino‐hexopyranose (2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐glucopyranose), (V), show significantly different C—O bond torsions involving the anomeric carbon, with the H—C—O—H torsion angle approaching an eclipsed conformation in (III) (−10.9°) compared with 32.8 and 32.5° in (IV) and (V), respectively. Ring carbon deoxygenation significantly affects the endo‐ and exocyclic C—C and C—O bond lengths throughout the pyranose ring, with longer bonds generally observed in the monodeoxygenated species (III) and (V) compared with (IV). These structural changes are attributed to differences in exocyclic C—O bond conformations and/or hydrogen‐bonding patterns superimposed on the direct (intrinsic) effect of monodeoxygenation. The exocyclic hydroxymethyl conformation in (III) (gt) differs from that observed in (IV) and (V) (gg).     

Synthetic studies with 3‐Oxo‐N‐[4‐(3‐oxo‐ 3‐phenylpropionylamino)‐phenyl]‐3‐phenylpropionamide

3‐Oxo‐N‐[4‐(3‐oxo‐3‐phenylpropionylamino)‐phenyl]‐3‐phenylpropionamide 1 and its derivative 2‐benzoyl‐N‐[4‐(2‐benzoyl‐3‐(dimethylamino‐acryloylamino)‐phenyl]‐3‐dimethylaminoacrylamide 12 are used for the synthesis of the hitherto not known bis‐heterocyclic amine and bis‐heterocyclic carboxamide derivatives. Plausible mechanisms are discussed for the formation of the new compounds. J. Heterocyclic Chem., (2012).     

2‐(3‐tert‐Butyldimethylsiloxy‐4‐methoxyphenyl)‐6‐methoxy‐3‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxybenzoyl)indole

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C₃₂H₃₉NO₇Si, all geometric parameters fall within experimental error of expected values. The analysis of molecular‐packing plots reveals an infinite two‐dimensional linear array running parallel to the b axis, formed by one N—H?O intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding interaction. Several potential C—H?O interactions are also present.     

(Z)‐3‐(1‐Methyl‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)‐2‐(thio­phen‐3‐yl)­acrylo­nitrile

The title compound, C₁₆H₁₂N₂S, has been synthesized by base‐catalyzed condensation of 1‐methyl­indole‐3‐carbox­aldehyde with thio­phene‐3‐aceto­nitrile. The product assumes an approx­imately planar Z configuration. The mol­ecule has a thienyl‐ring flip disorder.     

8‐(2‐Bromo‐3‐methoxy‐3‐methylbutyl)‐7‐methoxycoumarin

The title compound, C₁₆H₁₉BrO₄, is a derivative of osthol, isolated from the seeds of Imperatoria Osthruthium. The structure was solved in space group P, with two mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, and was refined to a final R factor of 0.064. The two mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit differ in the orientation of their brominated substituent group. The benzo­pyran ring displays aromatic character. The packing of the mol­ecules in the lattice is mainly due to C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.     

A three‐dimensional coordination polymer based on the Zn4(μ3‐OH)2 unit: poly[[(μ4‐benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylato)bis(μ3‐benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylato)bis(μ3‐hydroxido)bis(1,10‐phenanthroline‐5,6‐dione)tetrazinc] dihydrate]

The title compound, {[Zn₄(C₈H₄O₄)₃(OH)₂(C₁₂H₆N₂O₂)₂]·2H₂O}_n, has been prepared hydrothermally by the reaction of Zn(NO₃)₂·6H₂O with benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylic acid (H₂bdc) and 1,10‐phenanthroline‐5,6‐dione (pdon) in H₂O. In the crystal structure, a tetranuclear Zn₄(OH)₂ fragment is located on a crystallographic inversion centre which relates two subunits, each containing a [ZnN₂O₄] octahedron and a [ZnO₄] tetrahedron bridged by a μ₃‐OH group. The pdon ligand chelates to zinc through its two N atoms to form part of the [ZnN₂O₄] octahedron. The two crystallographically independent bdc²⁻ ligands are fully deprotonated and adopt μ₃‐κO:κO′:κO′′ and μ₄‐κO:κO′:κO′′:κO′′′ coordination modes, bridging three or four Zn^II cations, respectively, from two Zn₄(OH)₂ units. The Zn₄(OH)₂ fragment connects six neighbouring tetranuclear units through four μ₃‐bdc²⁻ and two μ₄‐bdc²⁻ ligands, forming a three‐dimensional framework with uninodal 6‐connected α‐Po topology, in which the tetranuclear Zn₄(OH)₂ units are considered as 6‐connected nodes and the bdc²⁻ ligands act as linkers. The uncoordinated water molecules are located on opposite sides of the Zn₄(OH)₂ unit and are connected to it through hydrogen‐bonding interactions involving hydroxide and carboxylate groups. The structure is further stabilized by extensive π–π interactions between the pdon and μ₄‐bdc²⁻ ligands.     

Synthesis of 3‐aroyl‐4‐(3‐chromonyl)‐2‐pyrazolines

New 3‐aroyl‐4‐(3‐chromonyl)‐2‐pyrazolines have been synthesized by the reaction of 3‐(3‐aryl‐3‐oxo‐propenyl)chromen‐4‐ones and diazomethane. Some of these 2‐pyrazolines have also been N‐acylated with a mixture of anhydrous pyridine and acetic anhydride or propionic anhydride. Structures of all new compounds have been elucidated by elemental analyses, mass spectrometry, ir and nmr spectroscopic measurements.     

trans‐Bis[3‐(2‐fluorophenyl)‐1‐(4‐nitrophenyl)triazenido‐κN3]bis(pyridine‐κN)palladium(II)

In the title complex, [Pd(C₁₂H₈FN₄O₂)₂(C₅H₅N)₂] or trans‐[Pd(FC₆H₄N=N—NC₆H₄NO₂)(C₅H₅N)₂], the Pd atom lies on a centre of inversion in space group P. The coordination geometry about the Pd²⁺ ion is square planar, with two deprotonated 3‐(2‐fluoro­phenyl)‐1‐(4‐nitro­phenyl)­triazenide ions, FC₆H₄N=N—NC₆H₄NO₂^?, acting as monodentate ligands (two‐electron donors), while two neutral pyridine mol­ecules complete the metal coordination sphere. The whole triazenide ligand is not planar, with the largest interplanar angle being 16.8 (5)° between the phenyl ring of the 2‐­fluorophenyl group and the plane defined by the N=N—N moiety. The Pd—N(triazenide) and Pd—N(pyridine) distances are 2.021 (3) and 2.039 (3) Å, respectively.     

(4S)‐3‐[(2R,3S)‐3‐Hydr­oxy‐2‐methyl‐3‐phenyl­propion­yl]‐4‐isopropyl­oxazolidin‐2‐one

The mol­ecule of the title compound, C₁₆H₂₁NO₄, is chiral and has three asymmetric centres. The absolute configuration was not determined via diffraction measurements on the crystal, but was established from the known absolute configuration of the starting material. In the crystal structure, the mol­ecules assemble through inter­molecular hydrogen bonds into a macrostructure with helical channels.     

2‐Hydroxy‐4,6‐dimethoxy‐3‐(3‐methylbutanoyl)benzaldehyde

The structure of the title compound, C₁₄H₁₈O₅, has two independent molecules related by a local noncrystallographic a‐glide plane perpendicular to the b axis. The pseudo‐glide plane shows a discontinuity at z = 0. Both molecules have an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the hydroxy and aldehyde groups. There are stacks of molecules along the a‐axis direction. Neighboring molecules in the stack have an interplanar angle of 1.6 (1)°, interplanar distances ranging between 3.399 (3) and 3.417 (3) Å, and a ring offset of 1.38 (1) Å.     

Synthesis of 1‐substituted 5‐aryl‐3‐(3‐coumarinyl)‐2‐pyrazolines by the reaction of 3‐aryl‐1‐(3‐coumarinyl)propen‐1‐ones with hydrazines

1‐Acetyl‐ and 1‐propionyl‐2‐pyrazolines 11‐27 have been synthesized by the reaction of (3‐coumarinyl)chalcones 1‐10 with hydrazine in hot acetic acid or propionic acid. While 5‐aryl‐3‐(3‐coumarinyl)‐1‐phenyl‐2‐pyrazolines 28‐35 have been prepared by the reaction of (3‐coumarinyl)chalcones 1,3,5‐10 with phenylhydrazine in hot pyridine. Structures of all new compounds have been elucidated by microanalyses, ¹H and ¹³C nmr spectroscopies.     

2‐[(E)‐(4‐Hydroxy‐3‐methoxybenzylidene)amino]‐N‐(2‐methylphenyl)‐4,5,6,7‐tetrahydro‐1‐benzothiophene‐3‐carboxamide

The title compound, C₂₄H₂₄N₂O₃S, exhibits antifungal and antibacterial properties. The compound crystallizes with two molecules in the asymmetric unit, with one molecule exhibiting `orientational disorder' in the crystal structure with respect to the cyclohexene ring. The o‐toluidine groups in both molecules are noncoplanar with the respective cyclohexene‐fused thiophene ring. In both molecules, there is an intramolecular N—H...N hydrogen bond forming a pseudo‐six‐membered ring which locks the molecular conformation and eliminates conformational flexibility. The crystal structure is stabilized by O—H...O hydrogen bonds; both molecules in the asymmetric unit form independent chains, each such chain consisting of alternating `ordered' and `disordered' molecules in the crystal lattice.     

Synthesis of all‐conjugated poly(3‐hexylthiophene)‐block‐ poly(3‐(4′‐(3″,7″‐dimethyloctyloxy)‐3′‐pyridinyl)thiophene) and its blend for photovoltaic applications

New all‐conjugated block copolythiophene, poly(3‐hexylthiophene)‐block‐poly(3‐(4′‐(3″,7″‐dimethyloctyloxy)‐3′‐pyridinyl)thiophene) (P3HT‐b‐P3PyT) was successfully prepared by Grignard metathesis polymerization. The supramolecular interaction between [6,6]‐phenyl‐C₆₁‐butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) and P3PyT was proposed to control the aggregated size of PCBM and long‐term thermal stability of the photovoltaic cell, as evidenced by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and optical microscopy. The effect of different solvents on the electronic and optoelectronic properties was studied, including chloroform (CL), dichlorobenzene (DCB), and mixed solvent of CL/DCB. The optimized bulk heterojunction solar cell devices using the P3HT‐b‐P3PyT/PCBM blend showed a power conversion efficiency of 2.12%, comparable to that of P3HT/PCBM device despite the fact that former had a lower crystallinity or absorption coefficient. Furthermore, P3HT‐b‐P3PyT could be also used as a surfactant to enhance the long‐term thermal stability of P3HT/PCBM‐based solar cells by limiting the aggregated size of PCBM. This study represents a new supramolecular approach to design all‐conjugated block copolymers for high‐performance photovoltaic devices. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2011.     

Crystallographic report: 1,1‐Diphenyl‐3‐(triphenylgermyl)‐3‐(4‐chlorophenyl) propanol

The germanium atom in [(C₆H₅)₃GeCH(4‐ClC₆H₄)CH₂C(C₆H₅)₂OH] is in a distorted tetrahedral geometry. Steric hindrance precludes O? H···O intra‐ or inter‐molecular bonding. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.