A Routley–Meyer Semantics for Gödel 3-Valued Logic and Its Paraconsistent Counterpart

Routley–Meyer semantics (RM-semantics) is defined for Gödel 3-valued logic G3 and some logics related to it among which a paraconsistent one differing only from G3 in the interpretation of negation is to be remarked. The logics are defined in the Hilbert-style way and also by means of proof-theoretical and semantical consequence relations. The RM-semantics is defined upon the models for Routley and Meyer’s basic positive logic B₊, the weakest positive RM-semantics. In this way, it is to be expected that the models defined can be adapted to other related many-valued logics.     

Stream-based inconsistency measurement

Inconsistency measures have been proposed to assess the severity of inconsistencies in knowledge bases of classical logic in a quantitative way. In general, computing the value of inconsistency is a computationally hard task as it is based on the satisfiability problem which is itself NP-complete. In this work, we address the problem of measuring inconsistency in knowledge bases that are accessed in a stream of propositional formulæ. That is, the formulæ of a knowledge base cannot be accessed directly but only once through processing of the stream. This work is a first step towards practicable inconsistency measurement for applications such as Linked Open Data, where huge amounts of information is distributed across the web and a direct assessment of the quality or inconsistency of this information is infeasible due to its size. Here we discuss the problem of stream-based inconsistency measurement on classical logic, in order to make use of existing measures for classical logic. However, it turns out that inconsistency measures defined on the notion of minimal inconsistent subsets are usually not apt to be used in the streaming scenario. In order to address this issue, we adapt measures defined on paraconsistent logics and also present a novel inconsistency measure based on the notion of a hitting set. We conduct an extensive empirical analysis on the behavior of these different inconsistency measures in the streaming scenario, in terms of runtime, accuracy, and scalability. We conclude that for two of these measures, the stream-based variant of the new inconsistency measure and the stream-based variant of the contension inconsistency measure, large-scale inconsistency measurement in streaming scenarios is feasible.     

Multimodal Incompleteness Under Weak Negations

This paper shows that some classes of multimodal paraconsistent logics endowed with weak forms of negation are incompletable with respect to Kripke semantics. The reach of such incompleteness is discussed, and we argue that this shortcoming, more than just a logical predicament, may be relevant for attempts to characterize quantum logics and to handle quantum information and quantum computation.     

N.A. Vasil’ev’s Logical Ideas and the Categorical Semantics of Many-Valued Logic

Here we suggest a formal using of N.A. Vasil’ev’s logical ideas in categorical logic: the idea of “accidental” assertion is formalized with topoi and the idea of the notion of nonclassical negation, that is not based on incompatibility, is formalized in special cases of monoidal categories. For these cases, the variant of the law of “excluded n-th” suggested by Vasil’ev instead of the tertium non datur is obtained in some special cases of these categories. The paraconsistent law suggested by Vasil’ev is also demonstrated with linear and tensor logics but in a form weaker than he supposed. As we have, in fact, many truth-values in linear logic and topos logic, the admissibility of the traditional notion of inference in the categorical interpretation of linear and intuitionistic proof theory is discussed.     

Sequent Systems for Negative Modalities

Non-classical negations may fail to be contradictory-forming operators in more than one way, and they often fail also to respect fundamental meta-logical properties such as the replacement property. Such drawbacks are witnessed by intricate semantics and proof systems, whose philosophical interpretations and computational properties are found wanting. In this paper we investigate congruential non-classical negations that live inside very natural systems of normal modal logics over complete distributive lattices; these logics are further enriched by adjustment connectives that may be used for handling reasoning under uncertainty caused by inconsistency or undeterminedness. Using such straightforward semantics, we study the classes of frames characterized by seriality, reflexivity, functionality, symmetry, transitivity, and some combinations thereof, and discuss what they reveal about sub-classical properties of negation. To the logics thereby characterized we apply a general mechanism that allows one to endow them with analytic ordinary sequent systems, most of which are even cut-free. We also investigate the exact circumstances that allow for classical negation to be explicitly defined inside our logics.     

Two Semantical Approaches to Paraconsistent Modalities

In this paper we extend the anodic systems introduced in Bueno-Soler (J Appl Non Class Logics 19(3):291–310, 2009) by adding certain paraconsistent axioms based on the so called logics of formal inconsistency, introduced in Carnielli et al. (Handbook of philosophical logic, Springer, Amsterdam, 2007), and define the classes of systems that we call cathodic. These classes consist of modal paraconsistent systems, an approach which permits us to treat with certain kinds of conflicting situations. Our interest in this paper is to show that such systems can be semantically characterized in two different ways: by Kripke-style semantics and by modal possible-translations semantics. Such results are inspired in some universal constructions in logic, in the sense that cathodic systems can be seen as a kind of fusion (a particular case of fibring) between modal logics and non-modal logics, as discussed in Carnielli et al. (Analysis and synthesis of logics, Springer, Amsterdam, 2007). The outcome is inherently within the spirit of universal logic, as our systems semantically intermingles modal logics, paraconsistent logics and many-valued logics, defining new blends of logics whose relevance we intend to show.     

The lattice of extensions of the minimal logic

In this article, we survey the results on the lattice of extensions of the minimal logic Lj, a paraconsistent analog of the intuitionistic logic Li. Unlike the well-studied classes of explosive logics, the class of extensions of the minimal logic has an interesting global structure. This class decomposes into the disjoint union of the class Int of intermediate logics, the class Neg of negative logics with a degenerate negation, and the class Par of properly paraconsistent extensions of the minimal logic. The classes Int and Neg are well studied, whereas the study of Par can be reduced to some extent to the classes Int and Neg.     

The Pursuit of an Implication for the Logics L3A and L3B

The authors of Beziau and Franceschetto (New directions in paraconsistent logic, vol 152, Springer, New Delhi, 2015) work with logics that have the property of not satisfying any of the formulations of the principle of non contradiction, Béziau and Franceschetto also analyze, among the three-valued logics, which of these logics satisfy this property. They prove that there exist only four of such logics, but only two of them are worthwhile to study. The language of these logics does not consider implication as a connective. However, the enrichment of a language with an implication connective leads us to more interesting systems, therefore we look for one implication for these logics and we study further properties that the logics obtain when this connective is added to these systems.     

Abstract Logics, Logic Maps, and Logic Homomorphisms

What is a logic? Which properties are preserved by maps between logics? What is the right notion for equivalence of logics? In order to give satisfactory answers we generalize and further develop the topological approach of [4] and present the foundations of a general theory of abstract logics which is based on the abstract concept of a theory. Each abstract logic determines a topology on the set of theories. We develop a theory of logic maps and show in what way they induce (continuous, open) functions on the corresponding topological spaces. We also establish connections to well-known notions such as translations of logics and the satisfaction axiom of institutions [5]. Logic homomorphisms are maps that behave in some sense like continuous functions and preserve more topological structure than logic maps in general. We introduce the notion of a logic isomorphism as a (not necessarily bijective) function on the sets of formulas that induces a homeomorphism between the respective topological spaces and gives rise to an equivalence relation on abstract logics. Therefore, we propose logic isomorphisms as an adequate and precise notion for equivalence of logics. Finally, we compare this concept with another recent proposal presented in [2]. This research was supported by the grant CNPq/FAPESB 350092/2006-0.     

On the algebraic structure of linear, relevance, and fuzzy logics

 Substructural logics are obtained from the sequent calculi for classical or intuitionistic logic by suitably restricting or deleting some or all of the structural rules (Restall, 2000; Ono, 1998). Recently, this field of research has come to encompass a number of logics - e.g. many fuzzy or paraconsistent logics - which had been originally introduced out of different, possibly semantical, motivations. A finer proof-theoretical analysis of such logics, in fact, revealed that it was possible to subsume them under the previous definition (see e.g. Aguzzoli and Ciabattoni, 2000). Although proof systems for substructural logics are currently being investigated with remarkable success, their algebraic models do not seem equally satisfactory. In fact: (i) such structures are often very weak, i.e. they do not possess many interesting algebraic properties; (ii) as a consequence, their theories of ideals, congruences, and representation are as a rule scarcely developed, or even lacking. In this paper, we address these difficulties. Received: 18 February 2000 / Published online: 12 December 2001     

Natural Deduction for Post’s Logics and their Duals

In this paper, we introduce the notion of dual Post’s negation and an infinite class of Dual Post’s finitely-valued logics which differ from Post’s ones with respect to the definitions of negation and the sets of designated truth values. We present adequate natural deduction systems for all Post’s k-valued (\(k\geqslant 3\)) logics as well as for all Dual Post’s k-valued logics.     

Residuated fuzzy logics with an involutive negation

Residuated fuzzy logic calculi are related to continuous t-norms, which are used as truth functions for conjunction, and their residua as truth functions for implication. In these logics, a negation is also definable from the implication and the truth constant , namely is $\varphi \to \overline{0}$. However, this negation behaves quite differently depending on the t-norm. For a nilpotent t-norm (a t-norm which is isomorphic to Łukasiewicz t-norm), it turns out that is an involutive negation. However, for t-norms without non-trivial zero divisors, is G?del negation. In this paper we investigate the residuated fuzzy logics arising from continuous t-norms without non-trivial zero divisors and extended with an involutive negation. Received: 14 April 1998     

Implicational (semilinear) logics I: a new hierarchy

In abstract algebraic logic, the general study of propositional non-classical logics has been traditionally based on the abstraction of the Lindenbaum-Tarski process. In this process one considers the Leibniz relation of indiscernible formulae. Such approach has resulted in a classification of logics partly based on generalizations of equivalence connectives: the Leibniz hierarchy. This paper performs an analogous abstract study of non-classical logics based on the kind of generalized implication connectives they possess. It yields a new classification of logics expanding Leibniz hierarchy: the hierarchy of implicational logics. In this framework the notion of implicational semilinear logic can be naturally introduced as a property of the implication, namely a logic L is an implicational semilinear logic iff it has an implication such that L is complete w.r.t. the matrices where the implication induces a linear order, a property which is typically satisfied by well-known systems of fuzzy logic. The hierarchy of implicational logics is then restricted to the semilinear case obtaining a classification of implicational semilinear logics that encompasses almost all the known examples of fuzzy logics and suggests new directions for research in the field.     

Structuring the Universe of Universal Logic

How, why and what for we should combine logics is perfectly well explained in a number of works concerning this issue. But the interesting question seems to be the nature and the structure of the general universe of possible combinations of logical systems. Adopting the point of view of universal logic in the paper the categorical constructions are introduced which along with the coproducts underlying the fibring of logics describe the inner structure of the category of logical systems. It is shown that categorically the universe of universal logic turns out to be a topos and a paraconsistent complement topos. This work was supported by Russian Foundation for Humanities via the Project ”The structure of Universal Logics”, grant No 06-03-00195a.     

A duality theory for bilattices

Recent studies of the algebraic properties of bilattices have provided insight into their internal strucutres, and have led to practical results, especially in reducing the computational complexity of bilattice-based multi-valued logic programs. In this paper the representation theorem for interlaced bilattices without negation found in [19] and extended to arbitrary interlaced bilattices without negation in [2] is presented. A natural equivalence is then established between the category of interlaced bilattices and the cartesian square of the category of bounded lattices. As a consequence a dual natural equivalence is obtained between the category of distributive bilattices and the coproduct of the category of bounded Priestley spaces with itself. Some applications of these equivalences are given. The subdirectly irreducible interlaced bilattices are characterized in terms of subdirectly irreducible lattices. A known characterization of the join-irreducible elements of the "knowledge" lattice of an interlaced bilattice is used to establish a natural equivalence between the category of finite, distributive bilattices and the category of posets of the form . Received February 2, 1998; accepted in final form September 2, 1999.     

Glivenko like theorems in natural expansions of BCK‐logic

The classical Glivenko theorem asserts that a propositional formula admits a classical proof if and only if its double negation admits an intuitionistic proof. By a natural expansion of the BCK‐logic with negation we understand an algebraizable logic whose language is an expansion of the language of BCK‐logic with negation by a family of connectives implicitly defined by equations and compatible with BCK‐congruences. Many of the logics in the current literature are natural expansions of BCK‐logic with negation. The validity of the analogous of Glivenko theorem in these logics is equivalent to the validity of a simple one‐variable formula in the language of BCK‐logic with negation. (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Fibered universal algebra for first-order logics

We extend Lawvere-Pitts prop-categories (aka. hyperdoctrines) to develop a general framework for providing fibered algebraic semantics for general first-order logics. This framework includes a natural notion of substitution, which allows first-order logics to be considered as structural closure operators just as propositional logics are in abstract algebraic logic. We then establish an extension of the homomorphism theorem from universal algebra for generalized prop-categories and characterize two natural closure operators on the prop-categorical semantics. The first closes a class of structures (which are interpreted as morphisms of prop-categories) under the satisfaction of their common first-order theory and the second closes a class of prop-categories under their associated first-order consequence. It turns out that these closure operators have characterizations that closely mirror Birkhoff's characterization of the closure of a class of algebras under the satisfaction of their common equational theory and Blok and Jónsson's characterization of closure under equational consequence, respectively. These algebraic characterizations of the first-order closure operators are unique to the prop-categorical semantics. They do not have analogues, for example, in the Tarskian semantics for classical first-order logic. The prop-categories we consider are much more general than traditional intuitionistic prop-categories or triposes (i.e., topos representing indexed partially ordered sets). Nonetheless, to the best of our knowledge, our results are new, even when restricted to these special classes of prop-categories.     

Modal Extensions of Sub-classical Logics for Recovering Classical Logic

In this paper we introduce non-normal modal extensions of the sub-classical logics CLoN, CluN and CLaN, in the same way that S0.5 ⁰ extends classical logic. The first modal system is both paraconsistent and paracomplete, while the second one is paraconsistent and the third is paracomplete. Despite being non-normal, these systems are sound and complete for a suitable Kripke semantics. We also show that these systems are appropriate for interpreting □ as “is provable in classical logic”. This allows us to recover the theorems of propositional classical logic within three sub-classical modal systems.     

Some Multi-Conclusion Modal Paralogics

I give a systematic presentation of a fairly large family of multiple-conclusion modal logics that are paraconsistent and/or paracomplete. After providing motivation for studying such systems, I present semantics and tableau-style proof theories for them. The proof theories are shown to be sound and complete with respect to the semantics. I then show how the “standard” systems of classical, single-conclusion modal logics fit into the framework constructed.