On the number of conjugacy classes of maximal subgroups in a finite soluble group

We show that for many formations \frak F\frak F, there exists an integer n = [`(m)](\frak F)n = \overline m(\frak F) such that every finite soluble group G not belonging to the class \frak F\frak F has at most n conjugacy classes of maximal subgroups belonging to the class \frak F\frak F. If \frak F\frak F is a local formation with formation function f, we bound [`(m)](\frak F)\overline m(\frak F) in terms of the [`(m)](f(p))(p ? \Bbb P )\overline m(f(p))(p \in \Bbb P ). In particular, we show that [`(m)](\frak N^k) = k+1\overline m(\frak N^k) = k+1 for every nonnegative integer k, where \frak N^k\frak N^k is the class of all finite groups of Fitting length ￡ k\le k.     

Une borne pour l‚action de l‚inertie sauvage sur la torsion d‚un module de Drinfeld

Soit f \phi un \mathbbF_q[t] \mathbb{F}_{q}[t] -module de Drinfeld défini sur un corps global K de caractéristique positive et a un élément de \mathbbF_q[t] \mathbb{F}_{q}[t] . Dans cet article, nous proposons une borne pour la différente et le genre de l‘extension K(a) obtenue en rajoutant à K tous les éléments de a-torsion de f \phi . En combinant ce résultat à une version effective du théorème de Chebotarev, on compare ensuite les représentations galoisiennes de deux modules de Drinfeld non isogènes.     

Finding Convex Sets in Convex Position

Let F{\cal{F}} denote a family of pairwise disjoint convex sets in the plane. F{\cal{F}} is said to be in convex position, if none of its members is contained in the convex hull of the union of the others. For any fixed k 3 5k\ge5, we give a linear upper bound on P_k(n)P_k(n), the maximum size of a family F{\cal{F}} with the property that any k members of F{\cal{F}} are in convex position, but no n are.     

Moser's second one-dimensional inequality for a class of integral operators

Suppose that $1 < p < \infty $1 < p < \infty , q=p/(p-1)q=p/(p-1), and for non-negative f ? L^p(-￥ ,￥)f\in L^p(-\infty\! ,\infty ) and any real x we let F(x)-F(0)=ò₀^xf(t) dtF(x)-F(0)=\int _0^xf(t)\ dt; suppose in addition that ò_-￥^￥ F(t)exp(-|t|) dt=0\int\limits _{-\infty }^\infty F(t)\exp (-|t|)\ dt=0. Moser's second one-dimensional inequality states that there is a constant C_pC_p, such that ò_-￥^￥ exp[a |F(x)|^q-|x|]  dx ￡ C_p\int\limits _{-\infty }^\infty \exp [a |F(x)|^q-|x|] \ dx\le C_p for each f with ||f||_p ￡ 1||f||_p\le 1 and every a ￡ 1a\le 1. Moreover the value a = 1 is sharp. We replace the operation connecting f with F by a more general integral operation; specifically we consider non-negative kernels K(t,x) with the property that xK(t,x) is homogeneous of degree 0 in t, x. We state an analogue of the inequality above for this situation, discuss some applications and consider the sharpness of the constant which replaces a.     

Total Dual Integrality of Matching Forest Constraints

Let G=(V, E, A) be a mixed graph. That is, (V, E) is an undirected graph and (V, A) is a directed graph. A matching forest (introduced by R. Giles) is a subset F of EèAE\cup A such that F contains no circuit (in the underlying undirected graph) and such that for each v ? Vv\in V there is at most one e ? Fe\in F such that v is head of e. (For an undirected edge e, both ends of e are called head of e.) Giles gave a polynomial-time algorithm to find a maximum-weight matching forest, yielding as a by-product a characterization of the inequalities determining the convex hull of the incidence vectors of the matching forests. We prove that these inequalities form a totally dual integral system. It is equivalent to an ``all-integer' min-max relation for the maximum weight of a matching forest. Our proof is based on an exchange property for matching forests, and implies Giles' characterization.     

A combinatorial condition on a certain variety of groups

Let n be an integer and B_n \mathcal B_n be the variety defined by the law [xⁿ,y][x,yⁿ]^-1 = 1.¶ Let B_n^* \mathcal B_n^* be the class of groups in which for any infinite subsets X, Y there exist x ? X x \in X and y ? Y y \in Y such that [xⁿ,y][x,yⁿ]^-1 = 1. For $ n \in {\pm 2, 3\} $ n \in {\pm 2, 3\} we prove that¶ B_n^* = B_n èF \mathcal B_n^* = \mathcal B_n \cup \mathcal F , F \mathcal F being the class of finite groups. Also for $ n \in {- 3, 4\} $ n \in {- 3, 4\} and an infinite group G which has finitely many elements of order 2 or 3 we prove that G ? B_n^* G \in \mathcal B_n^* if and only if G ? B_n G \in \mathcal B_n .     

Solution of generalized bisymmetry type equations without surjectivity assumptions

Summary. The solution of the rectangular m ×n m \times n generalized bisymmetry equation¶¶F(G₁(x₁₁,...,x_1n),..., G_m(x_m1,...,x_mn))     =     G(F₁(x₁₁,..., x_m1),...,  F_n(x_1n,...,x_mn) ) F\bigl(G_1(x_{11},\dots,x_{1n}),\dots,\ G_m(x_{m1},\dots,x_{mn})\bigr) \quad = \quad G\bigl(F_1(x_{11},\dots, x_{m1}),\dots, \ F_n(x_{1n},\dots,x_{mn}) \bigr) (A)¶is presented assuming that the functions F, G_j, G and F_i (j = 1, ... , m , i = 1, ... , n , m S 2, n S 2) are real valued and defined on the Cartesian product of real intervals, and they are continuous and strictly monotonic in each real variable. Equation (A) is reduced to some special bisymmetry type equations by using induction methods. No surjectivity assumptions are made.     

Boundedness and convergence of martingales in rearrangement-invariant function spaces

Let (W, F, P)(\Omega, \cal F, P) be a complete nonatomic probability space. We shall give a characterization of rearrangement-invariant spaces X over W\Omega with the property that every martingale f = (f_n)_{n \geqq 0}f = (f_n)_{n \geqq 0} bounded in X converges with respect to the norm topology of X. Using the results, we shall consider the summability of martingales by Toeplitz matrices.     

Quadratic isoperimetric inequality for mapping tori of polynomially growing automorphisms of free groups

We prove that the mapping torus F_n \rtimes_f \Bbb Z F_n \rtimes_\phi {\Bbb Z} of a polynomially growing automorphism f: F_n ? F_n \phi : F_n \to F_n of finitely generated free group F_n satisfies the quadratic isoperimetric inequality.     

On $\frak {F}$-normal Fitting classes of finite soluble groups

Let \frak X, \frak F,\frak X\subseteqq \frak F\frak {X}, \frak {F},\frak {X}\subseteqq \frak {F}, be non-trivial Fitting classes of finite soluble groups such that G_{\frak X}G_{\frak {X}} is an \frak X\frak {X}-injector of G for all G ? \frak FG\in \frak {F}. Then \frak X\frak {X} is called \frak F\frak {F}-normal. If \frak F=\frak S_p\frak {F}=\frak {S}_{\pi }, it is known that (1) \frak X\frak {X} is \frak F\frak {F}-normal precisely when \frak X^*=\frak F^*\frak {X}^{\ast }=\frak {F}^{\ast }, and consequently (2) \frak F í \frak X\frak N\frak {F}\subseteq \frak {X}\frak {N} implies \frak X^*=\frak F^*\frak {X}^{\ast }=\frak {F}^{\ast }, and (3) there is a unique smallest \frak F\frak {F}-normal Fitting class. These assertions are not true in general. We show that there are Fitting classes \frak F\not = \frak S_p\frak {F}\not =\frak {S}_{\pi } filling property (1), whence the classes \frak S_p\frak {S}_{\pi } are not characterized by satisfying (1). Furthermore we prove that (2) holds true for all Fitting classes \frak F\frak {F} satisfying a certain extension property with respect to wreath products although there could be an \frak F\frak {F}-normal Fitting class outside the Lockett section of \frak F\frak {F}. Lastly, we show that for the important cases \frak F=\frak Nⁿ, n\geqq 2\frak {F}=\frak {N}^{n},\ n\geqq 2, and \frak F=\frak S_p1?\frak S_pr, p_i \frak {F}=\frak {S}_{p_{1}}\cdots \frak {S}_{p_{r}},\ p_{i} primes, there is a unique smallest \frak F\frak {F}-normal Fitting class, which we describe explicitly.     

Propagation Properties for Schrödinger Operators Affiliated with Certain C*-Algebras

We consider anisotropic Schrödinger operators H = -D + V H = -{\Delta} + V in L²(\mathbbRⁿ) L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^n) . To certain asymptotic regions F we assign asymptotic Hamiltonians H_F such that (a) s(H_F) ì s_ess(H) \sigma(H_F) \subset \sigma_{\textrm{ess}}(H) , (b) states with energies not belonging to s(H_F) \sigma(H_F) do not propagate into a neighbourhood of F under the evolution group defined by H. The proof relies on C*-algebra techniques. We can treat in particular potentials that tend asymptotically to different periodic functions in different cones, potentials with oscillation that decays at infinity, as well as some examples considered before by Davies and Simon in [4].     

Equality of two variable weighted means: reduction to differential equations

Summary. Let F, Y \Phi, \Psi be strictly monotonic continuous functions, F,G be positive functions on an interval I and let n ? \Bbb N \{1} n \in {\Bbb N} \setminus \{1\} . The functional equation¶¶F^-1 ([(?_i=1ⁿF(x_i)F(x_i))/(?_i=1ⁿ F(x_i)]) Y^-1 ([(?_i=1ⁿY(x_i)G(x_i))/(?_i=1ⁿ G(x_i))])  (x₁,?,x_n ? I) \Phi^{-1}\,\left({\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\Phi(x_{i})F(x_{i})\over\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} F(x_{i}}\right) \Psi^{-1}\,\left({\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\Psi(x_{i})G(x_{i})\over\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} G(x_{i})}\right)\,\,(x_{1},\ldots,x_{n} \in I) ¶was solved by Bajraktarevi' [3] for a fixed n 3 3 n\ge 3 . Assuming that the functions involved are twice differentiable he proved that the above functional equation holds if and only if¶¶Y(x) = [(aF(x) + b)/(cF(x) + d)],       G(x) = kF(x)(cF(x) + d) \Psi(x) = {a\Phi(x)\,+\,b\over c\Phi(x)\,+\,d},\qquad G(x) = kF(x)(c\Phi(x) + d) ¶where a,b,c,d,k are arbitrary constants with k(c²+d²)(ad-bc) 1 0 k(c^2+d^2)(ad-bc)\ne 0 . Supposing the functional equation for all n = 2,3,... n = 2,3,\dots Aczél and Daróczy [2] obtained the same result without differentiability conditions.¶The case of fixed n = 2 is, as in many similar problems, much more difficult and allows considerably more solutions. Here we assume only that the same functional equation is satisfied for n = 2 and solve it under the supposition that the functions involved are six times differentiable. Our main tool is the deduction of a sixth order differential equation for the function j = F°Y^-1 \varphi = \Phi\circ\Psi^{-1} . We get 32 new families of solutions.     

On Lipschitz selections of affine-set valued mappings

We prove a Helly-type theorem for the family of all k-dimensional affine subsets of a Hilbert space H. The result is formulated in terms of Lipschitz selections of set-valued mappings from a metric space (M,r) ({\cal M},\rho) into this family.¶Let F be such a mapping satisfying the following condition: for every subset M￠ ì M {\cal M'} \subset {\cal M} consisting of at most 2^k+1 points, the restriction F|_M￠ F|_{\cal M'} of F to M￠ {\cal M'} has a selection f_M￠ (i.e. f_M￠(x) ? F(x) for all x  ? M￠) f_{\cal M'}\,({\rm i.e.}\,f_{\cal M'}(x) \in F(x)\,{\rm for\,all}\,x\,\in {\cal M'}) satisfying the Lipschitz condition ||f_M￠(x) - f_M￠(y)||  ￡ r(x,y ), x,y ? M￠ \parallel f_{\cal M'}(x) - f_{\cal M'}(y)\parallel\,\le \rho(x,y ),\,x,y \in {\cal M'} . Then F has a Lipschitz selection f : M ? H f : {\cal M} \to H such that ||f(x) - f(y) ||  ￡ gr(x,y ), x,y ? M \parallel f(x) - f(y) \parallel\,\le \gamma \rho (x,y ),\,x,y \in {\cal M} where g = g(k) \gamma = \gamma(k) is a constant depending only on k. (The upper bound of the number of points in M￠ {\cal M'} , 2^k+1, is sharp.)¶The proof is based on a geometrical construction which allows us to reduce the problem to an extension property of Lipschitz mappings defined on subsets of metric trees.     

A note on a conjecture of Borwein and Choi

A polynomial P(X) with coefficients {ǃ} of odd degree N - 1 is cyclotomic if and only if¶¶P(X) = ±F_p1 (±X)F_p2(±X^p1) ?F_pr(±X^{p1 p2 ?p_r-1}) P(X) = \pm \Phi_{p1} (\pm X)\Phi_{p2}(\pm X^{p1}) \cdots \Phi_{p_r}(\pm X^{p1 p2 \cdots p_r-1}) ¶where N = p₁ p₂ · · · p_r and the p_i are primes, not necessarily distinct, and where F_p(X) : = (X^p - 1) / (X - 1) \Phi_{p}(X) := (X^{p} - 1) / (X - 1) is the p-th cyclotomic polynomial. This is a conjecture of Borwein and Choi [1]. We prove this conjecture for a class of polynomials of degree N - 1 = 2^r p^l - 1 N - 1 = 2^{r} p^{\ell} - 1 for any odd prime p and for integers r, l\geqq 1 r, \ell \geqq 1 .     

Rational surfaces and moduli spaces of vector bundles on rational surfaces

Let X be a smooth algebraic surface, L ? Pic(X) L \in \textrm{Pic}(X) and H an ample divisor on X. Set M_X,H(2; L, c₂) the moduli space of rank 2, H-stable vector bundles F on X with det(F) = L and c₂(F) = c₂. In this paper, we show that the geometry of X and of M_X,H(2; L, c₂) are closely related. More precisely, we prove that for any ample divisor H on X and any L ? Pic(X) L \in \textrm{Pic}(X) , there exists n₀ ? \mathbbZ n_0 \in \mathbb{Z} such that for all n₀ \leqq c₂ ? \mathbbZ n_0 \leqq c_2 \in \mathbb{Z} , M_X,H(2; L, c₂) is rational if and only if X is rational.     

A correspondence for the supercuspidal representations of $\overline {SL_2(F)}$, F p-adic

Following D. Manderscheid, we describe the supercuspidal representations of the n-fold metaplectic cover [`(SL<sub>2</sub>(F))]\overline {SL_2(F)}, where F is a p-adic field with (p, 2n) = 1. We prove a "Frobenius formula" for the character of a supercuspidal representation of [`(SL₂(F))]\overline {SL_2(F)}. Using this formula, we obtain a character relation between corresponding supercuspidal representations of [`(SL₂(F))]\overline {SL_2(F)} and of SL₂(F)> in the case n = 2.     

Functional equations on semigroups

Summary. We determine the general solution g:S? F g:S\to F of the d'Alembert equation¶¶g(x+y)+g(x+sy)=2g(x)g(y)       (x,y ? S) g(x+y)+g(x+\sigma y)=2g(x)g(y)\qquad (x,y\in S) ,¶the general solution g:S? G g:S\to G of the Jensen equation¶¶g(x+y)+g(x+sy)=2g(x)       (x,y ? S) g(x+y)+g(x+\sigma y)=2g(x)\qquad (x,y\in S) ,¶and the general solution g:S? H g:S\to H of the quadratic equation¶¶g(x+y)+g(x+sy)=2g(x)+2g(y)       (x,y ? S) g(x+y)+g(x+\sigma y)=2g(x)+2g(y)\qquad (x,y\in S) ,¶ where S is a commutative semigroup, F is a quadratically closed commutative field of characteristic different from 2, G is a 2-cancellative abelian group, H is an abelian group uniquely divisible by 2, and s \sigma is an endomorphism of S with s(s(x)) = x \sigma(\sigma(x)) = x .     

Bounded solutions of the Golab—Schinzel equation

Summary. Let \Bbb K {\Bbb K} be either the field of reals or the field of complex numbers, X be an F-space (i.e. a Fréchet space) over \Bbb K {\Bbb K} n be a positive integer, and f : X ? \Bbb K f : X \to {\Bbb K} be a solution of the functional equation¶¶f(x + f(x)ⁿ y) = f(x) f(y) f(x + f(x)^n y) = f(x) f(y) .¶We prove that, if there is a real positive a such that the set { x ? X : |f(x)| ? (0, a)} \{ x \in X : |f(x)| \in (0, a)\} contains a subset of second category and with the Baire property, then f is continuous or { x ? X : |f(x)| ? (0, a)} \{ x \in X : |f(x)| \in (0, a)\} for every x ? X x \in X . As a consequence of this we obtain the following fact: Every Baire measurable solution f : X ? \Bbb K f : X \to {\Bbb K} of the equation is continuous or equal zero almost everywhere (i.e., there is a first category set A ì X A \subset X with f(X \A) = { 0 }) f(X \backslash A) = \{ 0 \}) .     

On the infinitesimal affine rigidity of ellipsoids in the n-space

Due to R. Schneider 1967 an ellipsoid E in the affine space \Bbb Aⁿ\Bbb A^n is affinely rigid, i.e. every other ovaloid F in \Bbb Aⁿ\Bbb A^n with the same affine Blaschke metric as for E equals E up to an equiaffine motion of E. Due to M. Kozlowski 1985 resp. W. Blaschke 1922 for n = 3 ellipsoids are moreover S-rigid resp. infinitesimally S-rigid in the sense of equal resp. infinitesimally equal affine scalar curvature S (unknown until now for n >3). - In this article it is proved that ellipsoids in \Bbb Aⁿ\Bbb A^n are also infinitesimally S-rigid for any n.     

On conjugacy of some systems of functions

Summary. We investigate the bounded solutions j:[0,1]? X \varphi:[0,1]\to X of the system of functional equations¶¶j(f_k(x))=F_k(j(x)),    k=0,?,n-1,x ? [0,1] \varphi(f_k(x))=F_k(\varphi(x)),\;\;k=0,\ldots,n-1,x\in[0,1] ,(*)¶where X is a complete metric space, f₀,?,f_n-1:[0,1]?[0,1] f_0,\ldots,f_{n-1}:[0,1]\to[0,1] and F₀,...,F_n-1:X? X F_0,...,F_{n-1}:X\to X are continuous functions fulfilling the boundary conditions f₀(0) = 0, f_n-1(1) = 1, f_k+1(0) = f_k(1), F₀(a) = a,F_n-1(b) = b,F_k+1(a) = F_k(b), k = 0,?,n-2 f_{0}(0) = 0, f_{n-1}(1) = 1, f_{k+1}(0) = f_{k}(1), F_{0}(a) = a,F_{n-1}(b) = b,F_{k+1}(a) = F_{k}(b),\,k = 0,\ldots,n-2 , for some a,b ? X a,b\in X . We give assumptions on the functions f_k and F_k which imply the existence, uniqueness and continuity of bounded solutions of the system (*). In the case X = \Bbb C X= \Bbb C we consider some particular systems (*) of which the solutions determine some peculiar curves generating some fractals. If X is a closed interval we give a collection of conditions which imply respectively the existence of homeomorphic solutions, singular solutions and a.e. nondifferentiable solutions of (*).