非系统风险的回报率及其计量

现代金融理论认为,系统风险无法通过组合投资进行规避,承担系统风险被市场承认从而可以获得风险报酬;非系统风险可以通过组合投资进行有效分散,因而承担非系统风险不应获得风险回报.试图阐述系统风险完全可以规避,指出承担非系统风险也应获得风险报酬,给出计量非系统风险回报率的规划方法,该规划的最优解同样满足两基金分离定理.     

Fuzzy portfolio model with different investor risk attitudes

We propose a fuzzy portfolio model designed for efficient portfolio selection with respect to uncertain or vague returns. Although many researchers have studied the fuzzy portfolio model, no researcher has yet attempted a behavioral analysis of the investor in the fuzzy portfolio model. To address this problem, we examined investor risk attitudes—risk-averse, risk-neutral, or risk-seeking behaviors—to discover an efficient method for fuzzy portfolio selection. In this study, we relied on the advantages of possibilistic mean–standard deviation models that we believed would fit the risk attitudes of investors. Thus, we developed a fuzzy portfolio model that focuses on different investor risk attitudes so that fuzzy portfolio selection for investors who possess different risk attitudes can be achieved more easily. Finally, we presented a numerical example of a portfolio selection problem to illustrate ways to address problems presented by a variety of investor risk attitudes.     

投资组合风险的分散化研究

风险是金融投资领域的研究热点问题之下一,投资组合是降低投资风险的有效方法之一。人们在做出投资决策时总是追求在一定收益率下风险最小。本文论述了投资组合收益和风险的数学统计方法,阐明风险可分为系统风险和非系统风险,后者可以通过投资组合分散化。本文还探讨了证券相关性和组合风险之间的关系。最后作了实证分析。     

Uncertain portfolio optimization problem under a minimax risk measure

Portfolio optimization problem is concerned with choosing an optimal portfolio strategy that can strike a balance between maximizing investment return and minimizing investment risk. In many cases, the return rate of risky asset is neither a random variable nor a fuzzy variable. Then, it can be described as an uncertain variable. But, the existing works on uncertain portfolio optimization problem fail to find an analytic solution of optimal portfolio strategy. In this paper, we define a new uncertain risk measure for the modeling of investment risk. Then, an uncertain portfolio optimization model is formulated. By introducing a new variable, we transform it into an equivalent bi-criteria optimization model. Then, we derive a method for the construction of the set of analytic Pareto optimal solutions. Finally, a numerical simulation is carried out to show the applicability of the proposed model and the convenience of finding the analytic solution.     

A risk tolerance model for portfolio adjusting problem with transaction costs based on possibilistic moments

Due to changes of situation in financial markets and investors’ preferences towards risk, an existing portfolio may not be efficient after a period of time. In this paper, we propose a possibilistic risk tolerance model for the portfolio adjusting problem based on possibility moments theory. A Sequential Minimal Optimization (SMO)-type decomposition method is developed for finding exact optimal portfolio policy without extra matrix storage. We present a simple method to estimate the possibility distributions for the returns of assets. A numerical example is provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed models and approaches.     

Quadratic programming for portfolio optimization

Portfolio optimization is a procedure for generating a portfolio composition which yields the highest return for a given level of risk or a minimum risk for given level of return. The problem can be formulated as a quadratic programming problem. We shall present a new and efficient optimization procedure taking advantage of the special structure of the portfolio selection problem. An example of its application to the traditional mean-variance method will be shown. Formulation of the procedure shows that the solution of the problem is vector intensive and fits well with the advanced architecture of recent computers, namely the vector processor.     

Credit risk optimization using factor models

We study portfolio credit risk management using factor models, with a focus on optimal portfolio selection based on the tradeoff of expected return and credit risk. We begin with a discussion of factor models and their known analytic properties, paying particular attention to the asymptotic limit of a large, finely grained portfolio. We recall prior results on the convergence of risk measures in this “large portfolio approximation” which are important for credit risk optimization. We then show how the results on the large portfolio approximation can be used to reduce significantly the computational effort required for credit risk optimization. For example, when determining the fraction of capital to be assigned to particular ratings classes, it is sufficient to solve the optimization problem for the large portfolio approximation, rather than for the actual portfolio. This dramatically reduces the dimensionality of the problem, and the amount of computation required for its solution. Numerical results illustrating the application of this principle are also presented. JEL Classification G11     

A chance-constrained portfolio selection model with risk constraints

The paper by Huang [Fuzzy chance-constrained portfolio selection, Applied Mathematics and Computation 177 (2006) 500-507] proposes a fuzzy chance-constrained portfolio selection model and presents a numerical example to illustrate the proposed model. In this note, we will show that Huang’s model produces optimal portfolio investing in only one security when candidate security returns are independent to each other no matter how many independent securities are in the market. The reason for concentrative solution is that Huang’s model does not consider the investment risk. To avoid concentrative investment, a risk constraint is added to the fuzzy chance-constrained portfolio selection model. In addition, we point out that the result of the numerical example is inaccurate.     

Credit risk optimization with Conditional Value-at-Risk criterion

This paper examines a new approach for credit risk optimization. The model is based on the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) risk measure, the expected loss exceeding Value-at-Risk. CVaR is also known as Mean Excess, Mean Shortfall, or Tail VaR. This model can simultaneously adjust all positions in a portfolio of financial instruments in order to minimize CVaR subject to trading and return constraints. The credit risk distribution is generated by Monte Carlo simulations and the optimization problem is solved effectively by linear programming. The algorithm is very efficient; it can handle hundreds of instruments and thousands of scenarios in reasonable computer time. The approach is demonstrated with a portfolio of emerging market bonds. Received: November 1, 1999 / Accepted: October 1, 2000?Published online December 15, 2000     

Minimal concave cost rebalance of a portfolio to the efficient frontier

One usually constructs a portfolio on the efficient frontier, but it may not be efficient after, say three months since the efficient frontier will shift as the elapse of time. We then have to rebalance the portfolio if the deviation is no longer acceptable. The method to be proposed in this paper is to find a portfolio on the new efficient frontier such that the total transaction cost required for this rebalancing is minimal. This problem results in a nonconvex minimization problem, if we use mean-variance model. In this paper we will formulate this problem by using absolute deviation as the measure of risk and solve the resulting linearly constrained concave minimization problem by a branch and bound algorithm successfully applied to portfolio optimization problem under concave transaction costs. It will be demonstrated that this method is efficient and that it leads to a significant reduction of transaction costs. Key words.portfolio optimization – rebalance – mean-absolute deviation model – concave cost minimization – optimization over the efficient set – global optimizationMathematics Subject Classification (1991):20E28, 20G40, 20C20     

Efficient option risk measurement with reduced model risk

Options require risk measurement that is also computationally efficient as it is important to derivatives risk management. There are currently few methods that are specifically adapted for efficient option risk measurement. Moreover, current methods rely on series approximations and incur significant model risks, which inhibit their applicability for risk management.In this paper we propose a new approach to computationally efficient option risk measurement, using the idea of a replicating portfolio and coherent risk measurement. We find our approach to option risk measurement provides fast computation by practically eliminating nonlinear computational operations. We reduce model risk by eliminating calibration and implementation risks by using mostly observable data, we remove internal model risk for complex option portfolios by not admitting arbitrage opportunities, we are also able to incorporate liquidity or model misspecification risks. Additionally, our method enables tractable and convex optimisation of portfolios containing multiple options. We conduct numerical experiments to test our new approach and they validate it over a range of option pricing parameters.     

Capital adequacy and risk management in banking industry

The present paper deals with the issue of bank capital adequacy and risk management within a stochastic dynamic setting. In particular, an explicit risk aggregation and capital expression is provided regarding the portfolio choice and capital requirements special context. Such a framework leads to a nonlinear stochastic optimal control problem whose solution may be determined by means of dynamic programming algorithm. The pertaining analysis relies heavily on the stochastic dynamic modeling of such balance sheet items as securities, loans, and regulatory capital with stochastic interest rates. In this respect, the special Kalman filter approach is used for the purpose of estimating the model parameters. The reached findings reveal well that the Tunisian bank, subject of study, generally exceeds the minimum requirements and is adequately capitalized to maintain the appropriate capital amount level commensurate with the aggregate risk. Besides, empirical evidence on the regulations' impact on driving bank capitalization and risk‐taking behavior has also been highlighted. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

一类投资组合选择的线性规划方法研究

如何在摩擦市场下构建最优组合一直是一个非常有意义的问题.人们通常在有效前沿上选择最优的投资组合,但是值得注意的是,如果我们考虑摩擦因素,原本的有效组合将不再有效.探讨如何在无风险借贷利率不同的摩擦市场下构建投资组合模型.为了得到最优策略,我们先利用Karush-Kuhn-Tucker条件给出一类线性规划问题求解方法,然后具体阐述如何将投资决策问题转化为可以求解的线性规划问题,最后给出在无风险借贷利率不同的情况下投资组合的有效边界.     

An exact solution to a robust portfolio choice problem with multiple risk measures under ambiguous distribution

This paper proposes a unified framework to solve distributionally robust mean-risk optimization problem that simultaneously uses variance, value-at-risk (VaR) and conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) as a triple-risk measure. It provides investors with more flexibility to find portfolios in the sense that it allows investors to optimize a return-risk profile in the presence of estimation error. We derive a closed-form expression for the optimal portfolio strategy to the robust mean-multiple risk portfolio selection model under distribution and mean return ambiguity (RMP). Specially, the robust mean-variance, robust maximum return, robust minimum VaR and robust minimum CVaR efficient portfolios are all special instances of RMP portfolios. We analytically and numerically show that the resulting portfolio weight converges to the minimum variance portfolio when the level of ambiguity aversion is in a high value. Using numerical experiment with simulated data, we demonstrate that our robust portfolios under ambiguity are more stable over time than the non-robust portfolios.     

Robustness of optimal portfolios under risk and stochastic dominance constraints

Solutions of portfolio optimization problems are often influenced by a model misspecification or by errors due to approximation, estimation and incomplete information. The obtained results, recommendations for the risk and portfolio manager, should be then carefully analyzed. We shall deal with output analysis and stress testing with respect to uncertainty or perturbations of input data for static risk constrained portfolio optimization problems by means of the contamination technique. Dependence of the set of feasible solutions on the probability distribution rules out the straightforward construction of convexity-based global contamination bounds. Results obtained in our paper [Dupa?ová, J., & Kopa, M. (2012). Robustness in stochastic programs with risk constraints. Annals of Operations Research, 200, 55–74.] were derived for the risk and second order stochastic dominance constraints under suitable smoothness and/or convexity assumptions that are fulfilled, e.g. for the Markowitz mean–variance model. In this paper we relax these assumptions having in mind the first order stochastic dominance and probabilistic risk constraints. Local bounds for problems of a special structure are obtained. Under suitable conditions on the structure of the problem and for discrete distributions we shall exploit the contamination technique to derive a new robust first order stochastic dominance portfolio efficiency test.     

A mixed R&D projects and securities portfolio selection model

The business environment is full of uncertainty. Allocating the wealth among various asset classes may lower the risk of overall portfolio and increase the potential for more benefit over the long term. In this paper, we propose a mixed single-stage R&D projects and multi-stage securities portfolio selection model. Specifically, we present a bi-objective mixed-integer stochastic programming model. Moreover, we use semi-absolute deviation risk functions to measure the risk of mixed asset portfolio. Based on the idea of moments approximation method via linear programming, we propose a scenario generation approach for the mixed single-stage R&D projects and multi-stage securities portfolio selection problem. The bi-objective mixed-integer stochastic programming problem can be solved by transforming it into a single objective mixed-integer stochastic programming problem. A numerical example is given to illustrate the behavior of the proposed mixed single stage R&D projects and multi-stage securities portfolio selection model.     

Modelling dynamic portfolio risk using risk drivers of elliptical processes

The situation of a limited availability of historical data is frequently encountered in portfolio risk estimation, especially in credit risk estimation. This makes it difficult, for example, to find statistically significant temporal structures in the data on the single asset level. By contrast, there is often a broader availability of cross-sectional data, i.e. a large number of assets in the portfolio. This paper proposes a stochastic dynamic model which takes this situation into account. The modelling framework is based on multivariate elliptical processes which model portfolio risk via sub-portfolio specific volatility indices called portfolio risk drivers. The dynamics of the risk drivers are modelled by multiplicative error models (MEMs)-as introduced by Engle [Engle, R.F., 2002. New frontiers for ARCH models. J. Appl. Econom. 17, 425-446]-or by traditional ARMA models. The model is calibrated to Moody’s KMV Credit Monitor asset returns (also known as firm-value returns) given on a monthly basis for 756 listed European companies at 115 time points from 1996 to 2005. This database is used by financial institutions to assess the credit quality of firms. The proposed risk drivers capture the volatility structure of asset returns in different industry sectors. A characteristic cyclical as well as a seasonal temporal structure of the risk drivers is found across all industry sectors. In addition, each risk driver exhibits idiosyncratic developments. We also identify correlations between the risk drivers and selected macroeconomic variables. These findings may improve the estimation of risk measures such as the (portfolio) Value at Risk. The proposed methods are general and can be applied to any series of multivariate asset or equity returns in finance and insurance.     

Calculating risk neutral probabilities and optimal portfolio policies in a dynamic investment model with downside risk control

This paper presents a method for solving multiperiod investment models with downside risk control characterized by the portfolio’s worst outcome. The stochastic programming problem is decomposed into two subproblems: a nonlinear optimization model identifying the optimal terminal wealth distribution and a stochastic linear programming model replicating the identified optimal portfolio wealth. The replicating portfolio coincides with the optimal solution to the investor’s problem if the market is frictionless. The multiperiod stochastic linear programming model tests for the absence of arbitrage opportunities and its dual feasible solutions generate all risk neutral probability measures. When there are constraints such as liquidity or position requirements, the method yields approximate portfolio policies by minimizing the initial cost of the replication portfolio. A numerical example illustrates the difference between the replicating result and the optimal unconstrained portfolio.     

Portfolio selection with a minimax measure in safety constraint

In this paper, we attempt to design a portfolio optimization model for investors who desire to minimize the variation around the mean return and at the same time wish to achieve better return than the worst possible return realization at every time point in a single period portfolio investment. The portfolio is to be selected from the risky assets in the equity market. Since the minimax portfolio optimization model provides us with the portfolio that maximizes (minimizes) the worst return (worst loss) realization in the investment horizon period, in order to safeguard the interest of investors, the optimal value of the minimax optimization model is used to design a constraint in the mean-absolute semideviation model. This constraint can be viewed as a safety strategy adopted by an investor. Thus, our proposed bi-objective linear programming model involves mean return as a reward and mean-absolute semideviation as a risk in the objective function and minimax as a safety constraint, which enables a trade off between return and risk with a fixed safety value. The efficient frontier of the model is generated using the augmented -constraint method on the GAMS software. We simultaneously solve the ratio optimization problem which maximizes the ratio of mean return over mean-absolute semideviation with same minimax value in the safety constraint. Subsequently, we choose two portfolios on the above generated efficient frontier such that the risk from one of them is less and the mean return from other portfolio is more than the respective quantities of the optimal portfolio from the ratio optimization model. Extensive computational results and in-sample and out-of-sample analysis are provided to compare the financial performance of the optimal portfolios selected by our proposed model with that of the optimal portfolios from the existing minimax and mean-absolute semideviation portfolio optimization models on real data from S&P CNX Nifty index.