Studying teachers’ mathematical argumentation in the context of refuting students’ invalid claims

This study investigates teachers’ argumentation aiming to convince students about the invalidity of their mathematical claims in the context of calculus. 18 secondary school mathematics teachers were given three hypothetical scenarios of a student's proof that included an invalid algebraic claim. The teachers were asked to identify possible mistakes and explain how they would refute the student's invalid claims. Two of them were also interviewed. The data were analysed in terms of the content and structure of argumentation and the types of counterexamples the teachers generated. The findings show that teachers used two main approaches to refute students’ invalid claims, the use of theory and the use of counterexamples. The role of these approaches in the argumentation process was analysed by Toulmin's model and three types of reasoning emerged that indicate the structure of argumentation in the case of refutation. Concerning the counterexamples, the study shows that few teachers use them in their argumentation and in general they underestimate their value as a proof method.     

Constructs of engagement emerging in an ethnomathematically-based teacher education course

This paper presents a case study, in which we apply and develop theoretical constructs to analyze motivating desires observed in an unconventional, culturally contextualized teacher education course. Participants, Israeli students from several different cultures and backgrounds (pre-service and in-service teachers, Arabs and Jews, religious and secular) together studied geometry through inquiry into geometric ornaments drawn from diverse cultures, and acquired knowledge and skills in multicultural education. To analyze affective behaviors in the course we applied the methodology of engagement structures recently proposed by Goldin and his colleagues. Our study showed that engagement structures were a powerful tool for examining motivating desires of the students. We found that the constructivist ethnomathematical approach highlighted the structures that matched our instructional goals and diminished those related to students’ feelings of dissatisfaction and inequity. We propose a new engagement structure “Acknowledge my culture” to embody motivating desires, arising from multicultural interactions, that foster mathematical learning.     

The role of framing in productive classroom discussions: A case for teacher learning

In this paper, we contrast two mathematical arguments that occurred during an algebra lesson to illustrate the importance of relevant framings in the ensuing arguments. The lesson is taken from a graduate course for elementary teachers who are enrolled in a mathematics specialist program. We use constructs associated with enthnography of argumentation to characterize the framings for warrants and backings that supported the ensuing arguments. Our findings suggest that teachers fully participated in argumentations that were framed by problem situations that were familiar to them, ones that were couched in elementary, fundamental mathematical ideas, and that these types of argumentations were arguably more productive in terms of opportunities for learning.     

Benefits of a teacher and coach collaboration: A case study

This paper describes a case study of a math teacher working with a math coach and the effects of their interaction. A guiding question was whether the coaching intervention had affected the teacher's classroom practices and, if so, in what way. The study utilized data from teacher/coach planning sessions, classroom lessons, follow-up debriefing sessions, and interviews with the teacher, coach and school principal. These data enabled the author to study the impact, if any, of the coaching on teacher beliefs and practices.     

A model of students’ combinatorial thinking

Combinatorial topics have become increasingly prevalent in K-12 and undergraduate curricula, yet research on combinatorics education indicates that students face difficulties when solving counting problems. The research community has not yet addressed students’ ways of thinking at a level that facilitates deeper understanding of how students conceptualize counting problems. To this end, a model of students’ combinatorial thinking was empirically and theoretically developed; it represents a conceptual analysis of students’ thinking related to counting and has been refined through analyzing students’ counting activity. In this paper, the model is presented, and relationships between formulas/expressions, counting processes, and sets of outcomes are elaborated. Additionally, the usefulness and potential explanatory power of the model are demonstrated through examining data both from a study the author conducted, and from existing literature on combinatorics education.     

Connecting multiplicative thinking and mathematical reasoning in the middle years

Mathematical reasoning and problem solving are recognised as essential 21st century skills. However, international assessments of mathematical literacy suggest these are areas of difficulty for many students. Evidenced-based learning trajectories that identify the key ideas and strategies needed to teach mathematics for understanding and support these important capacities over time are needed to support teachers and curriculum developers so that they do not have to rely solely on mathematics content knowledge. Given this goal and recent evidence to suggest a relationship between the development of multiplicative thinking and mathematical reasoning, this paper explores the processes involved in developing a single, integrated scale for multiplicative thinking and mathematical reasoning using data from a four-year design-based project to establish learning and assessment frameworks for algebraic, geometrical and statistical reasoning in the middle years of schooling.     

Fractional commensurate, composition, and adding schemes: Learning trajectories of Jason and Laura: Grade 5

A case study of two 5th-Grade children, Jason and Laura, is presented who participated in the teaching experiment, Children’s Construction of the Rational Numbers of Arithmetic. The case study begins on the 29th of November of their 5th-Grade in school and ends on the 5th of April of the same school year. Two basic problems were of interest in the case study. The first was to provide an analysis of the concepts and operations that are involved in the construction of three fractional schemes: a commensurate fractional scheme, a fractional composition scheme, and a fractional adding scheme. The second was to provide an analysis of the contribution of interactive mathematical activity in the construction of these schemes. The phrase, “commensurate factional scheme” refers to the concepts and operations that are involved in transforming a given fraction into another fraction that are both measures of an identical quantity. Likewise, “fractional composition scheme” refers to the concepts and operations that are involved in finding how much, say, 1/3 of 1/4 of a quantity is of the whole quantity, and “fractional adding scheme” refers to the concepts and operations involved in finding how much, say, 1/3 of a quantity joined to 1/4 of a quantity is of the whole quantity. Critical protocols were abstracted from the teaching episodes with the two children that illustrate what is meant by the schemes, changes in the children’s concepts and operations, and the interactive mathematical activity that was involved. The body of the case study consists of an on-going analysis of the children’s interactive mathematical activity and changes in that activity. The last section of the case study consists of an analysis of the constitutive aspects of the children’s constructive activity, including the role of social interaction and nonverbal interactions of the children with each other and with the computer software we used in teaching the children.     

Billiards in rational polygons: Periodic trajectories, symmetries, and d-stability

Periodic trajectories of billiards in rational polygons satisfying the Veech alternative, in particular, in right triangles with an acute angle of the form π/n with integern are considered. The properties under investigation include: symmetry of periodic trajectories, asymptotics of the number of trajectories whose length does not exceed a certain value, stability of periodic billiard trajectories under small deformations of the polygon. Translated fromMatematicheskie Zametki, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 66–75, July, 1997. Translated by V. N. Dubrovsky     

Learning trajectory of a student with learning disabilities for the concept of length: A teaching experiment

This study aims to map the learning trajectory (LT) of a student with learning disabilities (LDs) regarding the unit concept in length measurement and the usage of rulers. The article draws on data from a teaching experiment with a 10-year-old student with LDs in Turkey. Data were analyzed in two stages, including microanalysis, where each successive teaching session was separately analyzed, and macroanalysis, where the teaching sessions regarding interrelated instructional goals were analyzed to construct the LT. The main findings of the study illustrate that this student with LDs eliminated her misconceptions about the unit concept and using a ruler, accomplished the determined instructional goals to a large extent, and reached a higher level of thinking with a 4-month teaching experiment designed based on her specific developmental capacity.     

Shifts of mathematical thinking in adolescence

This theoretical paper relates key features of the mathematics adolescents are expected to learn in school to other aspects of adolescent development. Difficulties in mathematical learning at that age include changes in perspective and in the actions that are mathematically productive. Commonly-recommended methods of trying to engage adolescents in mathematics do not necessarily enable students to shift to new perceptions and new ways of constructing mathematical understandings, yet the shifts students need to make are in accord with other aspects of adolescent development.     

Supporting the development of algebraic thinking in middle school: a closer look at students’ informal strategies

This study investigated how 31 sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade middle school students who had not previously, nor were currently taking a formal Algebra course, approached word problems of an algebraic nature. Specifically, these algebraic word problems were of the form x + (x + a) + (x + b) = c or ax + bx + cx = d. An examination of students’ understanding of the relationships expressed in the problems and how they used this information to solve problems was conducted. Data included the students’ written responses to problems, field notes of researcher-student interactions while working on the problems, and follow-up interviews. Results showed that students had many informal strategies for solving the problems with systematic guess and check being the most common approach. Analysis of researcher-student interactions while working on the problems revealed ways in which students struggled to engage in the problems. Support mechanisms for students who struggle with these problems are suggested. Finally, implications are provided for drawing upon students’ informal and intuitive knowledge to support the development of algebraic thinking.     

Effectively coaching middle school teachers: A case for teacher and student learning

In this paper we report findings from a two-year, large-scale research project that describes the work of middle school mathematics specialists (also referred to as mathematics coaches or instructional coaches) who served in 10 school districts. We use mixed methods to describe how mathematics specialists spent their time supporting teachers and how these supports contributed to meaningful changes that teachers made in their instructional practices. We also report results that correlate student achievement scores with whether or not teachers were highly engaged with the mathematics specialists. We coordinate these quantitative results with findings from several case studies to illustrate the qualitatively different ways that mathematics specialists supported teachers’ ongoing work with their students. We also account for why some teachers participated more fully than others. Importantly, because mathematics specialists’ work was situated in different school settings with different demands, resources and administrative supports, these constraints and affordances contributed in part to how they could effectively support teachers’ work with their students.     

Singaporean students' mathematical thinking in problem solving and problem posing: an exploratory study

This study explored Singaporean fourth, fifth, and sixth grade students' mathematical thinking in problem solving and problem posing. The results of this study showed that the majority of Singaporean fourth, fifth, and sixth graders are able to select appropriate solution strategies to solve these problems, and choose appropriate solution representations to clearly communicate their solution processes. Most Singaporean students are able to pose problems beyond the initial figures in the pattern. The results of this study also showed that across the four tasks, as the grade level advances, a higher percentage of students in that grade level show evidence of having correct answers. Surprisingly, the overall statistically significant differences across the three grade levels are mainly due to statistically significant differences between fourth and fifth grade students. Between fifth and sixth grade students, there are no statistically significant differences in most of the analyses. Compared to the findings concerning US and Chinese students' mathematical thinking, Singaporean students seem to be much more similar to Chinese students than to US students.     

High school students’ understandings of geometric transformations in the context of a technological environment

This study investigated the nature of students’ understandings of geometric transformations, which included translations, reflections, rotations, and dilations, in the context of the technological tool, The Geometer’s Sketchpad. The researcher implemented a seven-week instructional unit on geometric transformations within an Honors Geometry class. Students’ conceptions of transformations as functions were analyzed using the APOS theory and were informed by an analysis of students’ interpretations and uses of representations of geometrical objects using the constructs of drawing and figure. The analysis suggests students’ understandings of key concepts including domain, variables and parameters, and relationships and properties of transformations were critical for supporting the development of deeper understandings of transformations as functions.     

Obstacles and challenges in preservice teachers’ explorations with fractions: A view from a small-scale intervention study

In this study, we implemented one-on-one fractions instruction to eight preservice teachers. The intervention, which was based on the principle of Progressive Formalization (Freudenthal, 1983), was centered on problem solving and on progressively formalizing the participants’ intuitive knowledge of fractions. The objectives of the study were to examine the potential effects of the intervention and to uncover specific difficulties experienced by the preservice teachers during instruction. Results revealed improvement on one measure of conceptual knowledge, but not on a transfer task, which required the teachers to generate word problems for number sentences involving fractions. In addition, the qualitative analysis of the videotaped instructional sessions revealed a number of cognitive obstacles encountered by the participants as they attempted to construct meaningful solutions and represent those solutions symbolically. Based on the findings, specific suggestions for modifying the intervention are provided for mathematics teacher educators.     

Engaging in problem posing activities in a dynamic geometry setting and the development of prospective teachers’ mathematical knowledge

In the present study we explore changes in perceptions of our class of prospective mathematics teachers (PTs) regarding their mathematical knowledge. The PTs engaged in problem posing activities in geometry, using the “What If Not?” (WIN) strategy, as part of their work on computerized inquiry-based activities. Data received from the PTs’ portfolios reveals that they believe that engaging in the inquiry-based activity enhanced both their mathematical and meta-mathematical knowledge. As to the mathematical knowledge, they deepened their knowledge regarding the geometrical concepts and shapes involved, and during the process of creating the problem and checking its validity and its solution, they deepened their understanding of the interconnections among the concepts and shapes involved. As to meta-mathematical knowledge, the PTs refer to aspects such as the meaning of the givens and their relations, validity of an argument, the importance and usefulness of the definitions of concepts and objects, and the importance of providing a formal proof.     

Equation structure and the meaning of the equal sign: The impact of task selection in eliciting elementary students’ understandings

This paper reports results from a written assessment given to 290 third-, fourth-, and fifth-grade students prior to any instructional intervention. We share and discuss students’ responses to items addressing their understanding of equation structure and the meaning of the equal sign. We found that many students held an operational conception of the equal sign and had difficulty recognizing underlying structure in arithmetic equations. Some students, however, were able to recognize underlying structure on particular tasks. Our findings can inform early algebra efforts by highlighting the prevalence of the operational view and by identifying tasks that have the potential to help students begin to think about equations in a structural way at the very beginning of their early algebra experiences.     

Supporting disciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledge development and design thinking in an informal,pre‐engineering program: A Workplace Simulation Project

In this paper, we examined students’ engagement in an implementation of a Workplace Simulation Project (WSP). The WSP was designed to actively engage students in learning disciplinary content by inviting engineers from industry to have a physical presence within the school building to collaborate with teachers and students to complete projects which simulate the tasks authentic to their work. We focus on the first year implementation of the program that partnered a high school in the rural Midwest with an engineering unit of a government organization. Using a multiple methods study design, we analyzed disciplinary and interdisciplinary pre and posts test along with students’ interviews to determine learning gains as well as students’ interpretations of creative and critical thinking as experienced in the project and their knowledge of the engineering design process. Effect sizes showed that students in the WSP group had notable gains over the control group participants. Additionally, students’ knowledge of core elements of the design process were identified in inductive analyses of the interviews. Findings from this study will provide usable knowledge about effective ways to support systems and design thinking and ways to support expert‐novice collaboration to ensure success.