Linear algebra students’ modes of reasoning: Geometric representations

Main goal of our research was to document differences on the types of modes linear algebra students displayed in their responses to the questions of linear independence from two different assignments. In this paper, modes from the second assignment are discussed in detail. Second assignment was administered with the support of graphical representations through an interactive web-module. Additionally, for comparison purposes, we briefly talk about the modes from the first assignment. First assignment was administered with the support of computational devices such as calculators providing the row reduced echelon form (rref) of matrices. Sierpinska’s framework on thinking modes (2000) was considered while qualitatively documenting the aspects of 45 matrix algebra students’ modes of reasoning. Our analysis revealed 17 categories of the modes of reasoning for the second assignment, and 15 categories for the first assignment. In conclusion, the findings of our analysis support the view of the geometric representations not replacing one’s arithmetic or algebraic modes but encouraging students to utilize multiple modes in their reasoning. Specifically, geometric representations in the presence of algebraic and arithmetic modes appear to help learners begin to consider the diverse representational aspects of a concept flexibly.     

Why do U.S. and Chinese students think differently in mathematical problem solving?: Impact of early algebra learning and teachers’ beliefs

This paper reports two studies that examined the impact of early algebra learning and teachers’ beliefs on U.S. and Chinese students’ thinking. The first study examined the extent to which U.S. and Chinese students’ selection of solution strategies and representations is related to their opportunity to learn algebra. The second study examined the impact of teachers’ beliefs on their students’ thinking through analyzing U.S. and Chinese teachers’ scoring of student responses. The results of the first study showed that, for the U.S. sample, students who have formally learned algebraic concepts are as likely to use visual representations as those who have not formally learned algebraic concepts in their problem solving. For the Chinese sample, students rarely used visual representations whether or not they had formally learned algebraic concepts. The findings of the second study clearly showed that U.S. and Chinese teachers view students’ responses involving concrete strategies and visual representations differently. Moreover, although both U.S. and Chinese teachers value responses involving more generalized strategies and symbolic representations equally high, Chinese teachers expect 6th graders to use the generalized strategies to solve problems while U.S. teachers do not. The research reported in this paper contributed to our understanding of the differences between U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical thinking. This research also established the feasibility of using teachers’ scoring of student responses as an alternative and effective way of examining teachers’ beliefs.     

Pedagogical representations to teach linear relations in Chinese and U.S. classrooms: Parallel or hierarchical?

This study investigates Chinese and U.S. teachers’ construction and use of pedagogical representations surrounding implementation of mathematical tasks. It does this by analyzing video-taped lessons from the Learner's Perspective Study, involving 15 Chinese and 10 U.S. consecutive lessons on the topic of linear equations/linear relations. We examined patterns of pedagogical representations that Chinese and U.S. teachers construct over a set of consecutive lessons, but also investigated the strategies of using representations to solve mathematical problems by Chinese and U.S. teachers. It was found that multiple representations were constructed simultaneously to develop the connection of relevant concepts in the U.S. classrooms while selective representations were constructed to develop relevant concepts in the Chinese classrooms. This study is significant because it contributes to our understanding of the cultural differences involving Chinese and U.S. students’ mathematical thinking and has practical implications for constructing pedagogical representations to maximize students’ learning.     

Promoting productive mathematical classroom discourse with diverse students

Productive mathematical classroom discourse allows students to concentrate on sense making and reasoning; it allows teachers to reflect on students’ understanding and to stimulate mathematical thinking. The focus of the paper is to describe, through classroom vignettes of two teachers, the importance of including all students in classroom discourse and its influence on students’ mathematical thinking. Each classroom vignette illustrates one of four themes that emerged from the classroom discourse: (a) valuing students’ ideas, (b) exploring students’ answers, (c) incorporating students’ background knowledge, and (d) encouraging student-to-student communication. Recommendations for further research on classroom discourse in diverse settings are offered.     

Students’ use of technological features while solving a mathematics problem

The design of technology tools has the potential to dramatically influence how students interact with tools, and these interactions, in turn, may influence students’ mathematical problem solving. To better understand these interactions, we analyzed eighth grade students’ problem solving as they used a java applet designed to specifically accompany a well-structured problem. Within a problem solving session, students’ goal-directed activity was used to achieve different types of goals: analysis, planning, implementation, assessment, verification, and organization. As we examined students’ goals, we coded instances where their use of a technology feature was supportive or not supportive in helping them meet their goal. We categorized features of this applet into four subcategories: (1) features over which a user does not have any control and remain static, (2) dynamic features that allow users to directly manipulate objects, (3) dynamic features that update to provide feedback to users during problem solving, and (4) features that activate parts of the applet. Overall, most features were found to be supportive of students’ problem solving, and patterns in the type of features used to support various problem solving goals were identified.     

Exploring college students’ mental representations of inferential statistics

We report a case study that explored how three college students mentally represented the knowledge they held of inferential statistics, how this knowledge was connected, and how it was applied in two problem solving situations. A concept map task and two problem categorization tasks were used along with interviews to gather the data. We found that the students’ representations were based on incomplete statistical understanding. Although they grasped various concepts and inferential tests, the students rarely linked key concepts together or to tests nor did they accurately apply that knowledge to categorize word problems. We suggest that one reason the students had difficulty applying their knowledge is that it was not sufficiently integrated. In addition, we found that varying the instruction for the categorization task elicited different mental representations. One instruction was particularly effective in revealing students’ partial understandings. This finding suggests that modifying the task format as we have done could be a useful diagnostic tool.     

Students’ geometric thinking with cube representations: Assessment framework and empirical evidence

While representations of 3D shapes are used in the teaching of geometry in lower secondary school, it is known that such representations can provide difficulties for students. In order to assess students’ thinking about 3D shapes, we constructed an assessment framework based on existing research studies and data from G7-9 students (aged 12–15). We then applied our framework to assess students’ geometric thinking in lessons. We report two cases of qualitative findings from a classroom experiment in which Grade 7 students (aged 12–13) tackled a problem in 3D geometry that was, for them, quite challenging. We found that students who failed to answer given problems did not mentally manipulate representations effectively, while others could mentally manipulate representations and reason about them in order to reach correct solutions. We conclude with the proposition that this finding shows the framework can be used by teachers in instruction to assess their students’ 3D geometric thinking.     

A naturalistic study of executive function and mathematical problem-solving

Our goal in this research was to understand the specific challenges middle-school students face when engaging in mathematical problem-solving by using executive function (i.e., shifting, updating, and inhibiting) of working memory as a functional construct for the analysis. Using modified talk-aloud protocols, real-time naturalistic analysis of eighth-grade students’ mathematical problem-solving were conducted. A fine-grained coding of the students’ talking-aloud during problem-solving in mathematics involved isolating the challenges students faced in each one of the four problem-solving phases, and then making a functional link to one of the executive functions of shifting, updating, and inhibiting. In total, 344 episodes were analyzed. Our results show that updating proved to be most challenging during the understanding the problem phase, inhibiting during the carrying out the plan phase, and shifting during the looking back and evaluation phase. Furthermore, students are more likely to make progress with the problem-solving if they are able to engage in a conscious appraisal of the problem at the onset of the problem-solving. Assisting students in establishing what the problem requires through the cognitive clues presented in the problem may necessitate explicit instructional on behalf of the teacher.     

Covariational reasoning and invariance among coordinate systems

Researchers continue to emphasize the importance of covariational reasoning in the context of students’ function concept, particularly when graphing in the Cartesian coordinate system (CCS). In this article, we extend the body of literature on function by characterizing two pre-service teachers’ thinking during a teaching experiment focused on graphing in the polar coordinate system (PCS). We illustrate how the participants engaged in covariational reasoning to make sense of graphing in the PCS and make connections with graphing in the CCS. By foregrounding covariational relationships, the students came to understand graphs in different coordinate systems as representative of the same relationship despite differences in the perceptual shapes of these graphs. In synthesizing the students’ activity, we provide remarks on instructional approaches to graphing and how the PCS forms a potential context for promoting covariational reasoning.     

Ways of talking and ways of positioning: Students’ beliefs in an inquiry-oriented differential equations class

As part of developmental research for an inquiry-oriented differential equations course, this study investigates the change in students’ beliefs about mathematics. The discourse analysis has identified two different types of perspective modes - i.e., discourse of the third-person perspective and discourse of the first-person perspective - in the students’ mathematical narratives, depending on their ways of positioning themselves with respect to mathematics. In the third-person perspective discourse, the students positioned themselves as passive recipients of mathematics that has been established by some external authority. In the first-person perspective discourse, the students positioned themselves as active mathematical inquirers and produced mathematics by interweaving their own mathematical ideas and experiences. Over the semester, students’ mathematical discourse changed from third-person perspective narratives to first-person perspective narratives. This change in their discourse pattern is interpreted as an indication of change in their beliefs about mathematics. Finally, this article discusses the instructional features that promote the change.     

Recursive and explicit rules: How can we build student algebraic understanding?

Differing perspectives have been offered about student use of recursive and explicit rules. These include: (a) promoting the use of explicit rules over the use of recursive rules, and (b) encouraging student use of both recursive and explicit rules. This study sought to explore students’ use of recursive and explicit rules by examining the reasoning of 25 sixth-grade students, including a focus on four target students, as they approached tasks in which they were required to develop generalizations while using computer spreadsheets as an instructional tool. The results demonstrate the difficulty that students had moving from the successful use of recursive rules toward explicit rules. In particular, two students abandoned general reasoning, instead focusing on particular values in an attempt to construct explicit rules. It is recommended that students be encouraged to connect recursive and explicit rules as a potential means for constructing successful generalizations.     

Embodied Semiotic Activities and Their Role in the Construction of Mathematical Meaning of Motion Graphs

This paper examines the relation between bodily actions, artifact-mediated activities, and semiotic processes that students experience while producing and interpreting graphs of two-dimensional motion in the plane. We designed a technology-based setting that enabled students to engage in embodied semiotic activities and experience two modes of interaction: 2D freehand motion and 2D synthesized motion, designed by the composition of single variable function graphs. Our theoretical framework combines two perspectives: the embodied approach to the nature of mathematical thinking and the Vygotskian notion of semiotic mediation. The article describes in detail the actions, gestures, graph drawings, and verbal discourse of one pair of high school students and analyzes the social semiotic processes they experienced. Our analysis shows how the computerized artifacts and the students’ gestures served as means of semiotic mediation. Specifically, they supported the interpretation and the production of motion graphs; they mediated the transition between an individual’s meaning of mathematical signs and culturally accepted mathematical meaning; and they enable linking bodily actions with formal signs.     

Students’ reflections on their learning experiences: lessons from a longitudinal study on the development of mathematical ideas and reasoning

This paper characterizes the views on mathematical learning of five high school students based on the students’ reflections on their mathematical experiences in a longitudinal study that focused on the development of mathematical ideas and reasoning in particular research conditions. The students’ views are presented according to five themes about learning which describe the students’ views on the nature of knowledge and what it means to know, source of knowledge, motivation to engage in learning, certainty in knowing, and how the students’ views vary with particular areas of mathematical activity. The study addresses the need for more research on epistemological beliefs of students below college age. In particular, the results provide evidence that challenge the existing assumption that, prior to college, students exhibit naïve epistemological beliefs.     

The role of operating premises and reasoning paths in upper elementary students’ problem solving

The validity of students’ reasoning is central to problem solving. However, equally important are the operating premises from which students’ reason about problems. These premises are based on students’ interpretations of the problem information. This paper describes various premises that 11- and 12-year-old students derived from the information in a particular problem, and the way in which these premises formed part of their reasoning during a lesson. The teacher’s identification of differences in students’ premises for reasoning in this problem shifted the emphasis in a class discussion from the reconciliation of the various problem solutions and a focus on a sole correct reasoning path, to the identification of the students’ premises and the appropriateness of their various reasoning paths. Problem information that can be interpreted ambiguously creates rich mathematical opportunities because students are required to articulate their assumptions, and, thereby identify the origin of their reasoning, and to evaluate the assumptions and reasoning of their peers.     

Secondary school students’ levels of understanding in computing exponents

The aim of this study is to describe and analyze students’ levels of understanding of exponents within the context of procedural and conceptual learning via the conceptual change and prototypes’ theory. The study was conducted with 202 secondary school students with the use of a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. The results suggest that three levels of understanding can be identified. At the first level students’ interpretation of exponents is based upon exponents that symbolize natural numbers. At Level 2, students’ knowledge acquisition process is a process of enrichment of the existing conceptual structures. Students at this level are able to compute exponents with negative numbers by extending the application of prototype examples. Finally, at Level 3 students not only extend the prototype examples but also reorganize their thinking in order to compute and compare exponents with roots, a concept which is quite different from the concept of exponents with natural numbers.     

Toward a student-centred process of teaching arithmetic

This article describes a way toward a student-centred process of teaching arithmetic, where the content is harmonized with the students’ conceptual levels. At school start, one classroom teacher is guided in recurrent teaching development meetings in order to develop teaching based on the students’ prerequisites and to successively learn the students’ arithmetic. The students are assessed in interviews. Two special teachers participate and their current models of each student's arithmetic are tested when assessing the students. The students’ conceptual diversity and the consequent different content in teaching are shown. Further, the special teachers’ assessments and the class teacher's opinion of the new way of teaching are reported. A wide range both of the students’ conceptual levels and of the kinds of relevant problems was found. The special teachers manage their duties well and the classroom teacher has so far been satisfied with the new teaching process.     

Using interactive algebra software to support a discourse community

In this work we studied the impact of using NuCalc, an interactive computer algebra software, on the development of a discourse community in a college level mathematics class. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected over the course of 3 weeks of instruction. We examined the influence of the software on: group interactions; the mathematical investigations of learners; and the teacher’s interactions with students. Data points to four distinct ways in which the presence of NuCalc positively impacted the learning community we studied: (1) it served as a tool for extending students’ mathematical thinking, (2) it motivated students’ engagement in group discourse, (3) it became a tool for mediating discourse, (4) it became a catalyst for refining the culture of classroom, shifting the patterns of interactions between the teacher and learners.     

Types of reasoning required in university exams in mathematics

Empirical research shows that students often use reasoning founded on copying algorithms or recalling facts (imitative reasoning) when solving mathematical tasks. Research also indicate that a focus on this type of reasoning might weaken the students’ understanding of the underlying mathematical concepts. It is therefore important to study the types of reasoning students have to perform in order to solve exam tasks and pass exams. The purpose of this study is to examine what types of reasoning students taking introductory calculus courses are required to perform. Tasks from 16 exams produced at four different Swedish universities were analyzed and sorted into task classes. The analysis resulted in several examples of tasks demanding different types of mathematical reasoning. The results also show that about 70% of the tasks were solvable by imitative reasoning and that 15 of the exams could be passed using only imitative reasoning.     

An exploration of students’ errors in derivatives in a university of technology

This paper reports on an exploration of errors that were displayed by students who studied mathematics in chemical engineering in derivatives of various functions such as algebraic, exponential, logarithmic and trigonometric functions. The participants of this study were a group of twenty students who were at risk in an extended curriculum programme in a university of technology in Western Cape, South Africa. The researcher used a qualitative case study approach and collected data from students’ written work. This research uses action, process, object, and schema (APOS) theory to classify errors into categories and to analyse and interpret the data collected. The students displayed five different kinds of errors, namely, conceptual, interpretation, linear extrapolation, procedural and arbitrary. The use of APOS theory as a framework revealed that several students’ errors might be caused by over-generalisation of mathematical rules and properties such as the power rule of differentiation and distributive property in manipulation of algebraic expressions. This study suggests that teaching of the standard rules of differentiation should put emphasis on its restrictions to eliminate common errors that normally crop up due to over-generalisation of certain differentiation rules.     

A model of students’ combinatorial thinking

Combinatorial topics have become increasingly prevalent in K-12 and undergraduate curricula, yet research on combinatorics education indicates that students face difficulties when solving counting problems. The research community has not yet addressed students’ ways of thinking at a level that facilitates deeper understanding of how students conceptualize counting problems. To this end, a model of students’ combinatorial thinking was empirically and theoretically developed; it represents a conceptual analysis of students’ thinking related to counting and has been refined through analyzing students’ counting activity. In this paper, the model is presented, and relationships between formulas/expressions, counting processes, and sets of outcomes are elaborated. Additionally, the usefulness and potential explanatory power of the model are demonstrated through examining data both from a study the author conducted, and from existing literature on combinatorics education.