Relationships between emotional dispositions and mathematics achievement moderated by instructional practices: analysis of TIMSS 2015

ABSTRACT

This research is a secondary analysis with Korean students’ data collected in the TIMSS 2015 to describe the moderation effects of instructional practices on the relationships between students’ emotional dispositions toward mathematics and mathematics achievement. From the TIMSS 2015 database, we collected mathematics achievement scores, a student-level contextual scale for students’ emotional disposition, and teacher-level contextual scales representing teachers’ instructional practices. We applied hierarchical linear modelling to construct multilevel models. The findings showed that the achievement gap between emotional dispositions – like and dislike – became smaller when teachers more frequently implemented certain instructional practices like asking students to complete challenging exercises, decide their own problem-solving procedures, and express their ideas in class. Students who disliked mathematics were likely to have higher scores as their teachers implemented each of those practices more frequently. Findings provide important implications to teachers regarding: It is important to encourage students to reason through instructional practices like asking them to decide their own problem-solving procedures and to solve challenging problems.     

Teacher listening: The role of knowledge of content and students

In this research report we consider the kinds of knowledge needed by a mathematician as she implemented an inquiry-oriented abstract algebra curriculum. Specifically, we will explore instances in which the teacher was unable to make sense of students’ mathematical struggles in the moment. After describing each episode we will examine the instructor's efforts to listen to the students and the way that these efforts were supported or constrained by her mathematical knowledge for teaching. In particular, we will argue that in each case the instructor was ultimately constrained by her knowledge of how students were thinking about the mathematics.     

Teaching routines and student-centered mathematics instruction: The essential role of conferring to understand student thinking and reasoning

We compare two lessons with respect to how a teacher centers student mathematical thinking to move instruction forward through enactment of five mathematically productive teaching routines: Conferring To Understand Student Thinking and Reasoning, Structuring Mathematical Student Talk, Working With Selected and Sequenced Student Math Ideas, Working with Public Records of Students’ Mathematical Thinking, and Orchestrating Mathematical Discussion. Findings show that the lessons differ in the enactment of teaching routines, especially Conferring to Understand Student Thinking and Reasoning which resulted in a difference in student-centeredness of the instruction. This difference highlights whose mathematics was being centralized in the classroom and whether the focus was on correct answers and procedures or on students’ mathematical thinking and justifying.     

Traditional instruction in advanced mathematics courses: a case study of one professor’s lectures and proofs in an introductory real analysis course

It is widely accepted by mathematics educators and mathematicians that most proof-oriented university mathematics courses are taught in a “definition-theorem-proof” format. However, there are relatively few empirical studies on what takes place during this instruction, why this instruction is used, and how it affects students’ learning. In this paper, I investigate these issues by examining a case study of one professor using this type of instruction in an introductory real analysis course. I first describe the professor’s actions in the classroom and argue that these actions are the result of the professor’s beliefs about mathematics, students, and education, as well as his knowledge of the material being covered. I then illustrate how the professor’s teaching style influenced the way that his students attempted to learn the material. Finally, I discuss the implications that the reported data have on mathematics education research.