Rheological and thermal study of delayed crystallization in poly(butylene terephthalate)/ethylene‐co‐ethyl acrylate blends

The effects of the composition and resulting morphology on the crystallization and rheology of blends containing poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and an ethylene‐co‐ethyl acrylate (EEA) copolymer, two immiscible polymers, were studied over the entire range of volume fractions. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms recorded during cooling showed important differences, mainly in terms of the PBT crystallization temperatures, depending on the blend composition. In addition to the classical crystallization peaks of PBT and EEA, a third crystallization peak appeared for blends containing less than 60% PBT. This peak was attributed to a delayed crystallization of PBT. This phenomenon was examined in terms of homogeneous crystallization. Linear viscoelastic measurements allowed the delayed crystallization behavior in these polymer blends to be displayed. Indeed, the variation of the storage modulus with the temperature showed increasing steps during cooling. These sudden increases appeared at temperatures very close to those at which the crystallization peaks were observed in the DSC experiments. This behavior was verified for different blend compositions. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 714–721, 2004     

Morphology and nonisothermal crystallization of in situ microfibrillar poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polypropylene blend fabricated through slit‐extrusion,hot‐stretch quenching

This study describes the morphology and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/isotactic polypropylene (iPP) in situ micro‐fiber‐reinforced blends (MRB) obtained via slit‐extrusion, hot‐stretching quenching. For comparison purposes, neat PP and PET/PP common blends are also included. Morphological observation indicated that the well‐defined microfibers are in situ generated by the slit‐extrusion, hot‐stretching quenching process. Neat iPP and PET/iPP common blends showed the normal spherulite morphology, whereas the PET/iPP microfibrillar blend had typical transcrystallites at 1 wt % PET concentration. The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of three samples were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Applying the theories proposed by Jeziorny, Ozawa, and Liu to analyze the crystallization kinetics of neat PP and PET/PP common and microfibrillar blends, agreement was found between our experimental results and Liu's prediction. The increases of crystallization temperature and crystallization rate during the nonisothermal crystallization process indicated that PET in situ microfibers have significant nucleation ability for the crystallization of a PP matrix phase. The crystallization peaks in the DSC curves of the three materials examined widened and shifted to lower temperature when the cooling rate was increased. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 374–385, 2004     

磷酸三苯酯对PBT／PET共混体系结晶行为的影响

用广角Ｘ－角线衍射法和差法扫描量热法研究了磷酸三苯酯对ＰＢＴ／ＰＥＴ共混体系结晶行为影响，结果表明：ＴＰＰＷ作为该共混体系的稳定剂，只能延长在熔融状态下酯交换反应发生的时间，ＴＰＰ含量一定时，熔融时间增加，ＰＢＴ，ＰＥＴ之间的酯交换反应同样会发生，不同熔融时间，就要求ＴＰＰ的用量也不相同。ＴＰＰ在ＰＢＴ／ＰＥＴ共混体系中没有结晶成核剂的作用，它也不改变ＰＢＴ，ＰＥＴ的结晶结构。     

Reactive compatibilization of polyamide‐6 (PA 6)/polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) blends by a multifunctional epoxy resin

A multifunctional epoxy resin has been demonstrated to be an efficient reactive compatibilizer for the incompatible and immiscible blends of polyamide‐6 (PA 6) and polybutylene terephthalate (PBT). The torque measurements give indirect evidence that the reaction between PA and PBT with epoxy has an opportunity to produce an in situ formed copolymer, which can be as an effective compatibilizer to reduce and suppress the size of the disperse phase, and to greatly enhance mechanical properties of PA/PBT blends. The mechanical property improvement is more pronounced in the PA‐rich blends than that in the PBT‐rich blends. The fracture behavior of the blend with less than 0.3 phr compatibilizer is governed by a particle pullout mechanism, whereas shear yielding is dominant in the fracture behavior of the blend with more than 0.3 phr compatibilizer. As the melt and crystallization temperatures of the base polymers are so close, either PA or PBT can be regarded as a mutual nucleating agent to enhance the crystallization on the other component. The presence of compatibilizer and in situ formed copolymer in the compatibilized blends tends to interfere with the crystallization of the base polymers in various blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 23–33, 2000     

Relationships between the molecular architecture,crystallization capacity,and miscibility in poly(butylene terephthalate)/polycarbonate blends: A comparison with poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polycarbonate blends

Poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)/polycarbonate (PC) samples, prepared via reactive blending in the presence of Ti‐ and Sm‐based catalysts, resulted in block copolymers whose block length decreased as the mixing time increased. A single homogeneous amorphous phase occurred when the blocks had monomeric sequences shorter than 10 units. Otherwise, a crystalline phase of PBT developed. Also, in poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/PC blends previously studied, the miscibility was strictly correlated with the crystallizability of the system. Therefore, the miscibility of the PBT/PC and PET/PC blends was compared with respect to the tendency of the PBT and PET blocks to crystallize under isothermal conditions. The crystallization rate of the PBT/PC copolymers was faster than that of the PET/PC copolymers with similar block lengths. Accordingly, the minimum crystallizable sequence length of the PBT blocks was shorter than that of the PET blocks (18 vs 31 monomeric unit sequences). This behavior was interpreted as an effect of the more flexible PBT units, which had a greater tendency to fold and crystallize than the PET units. Therefore, PBT, the blocks of which tended to crystallize even if they were very short and phase‐separated, was characterized by a poorer compatibility with PC than that of PET. As a result, the block size had a fundamental role in determining the crystallizability and, therefore, phase behavior of the semicrystalline block copolymers. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 2821–2832, 2004     

Thermal and spectroscopy studies on ternary miscibility and phase behavior in blends comprising poly(4‐vinyl phenol) and two aryl polyesters

Thermal analysis and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy characterizations were performed on three ternary blend systems that comprise poly(4‐vinyl phenol) (PVPh) and any two of the three homologous aryl polyesters [poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT), and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)]. Although PVPh is miscible with any one of the polyesters in forming a binary blend system, miscibility in ternary systems by introducing one more polymer of different structures to the blend system is not always expected. However, this study concludes that miscibility does exist in all these three ternary blends of all compositions investigated. Reasons and factors for such behavior were probed. Quantitative interactions in the ternary blend system were also estimated. The overall interaction energy density (B) by analysis of melting point depression for the PBT/PVPh/PET ternary blend system led to a negative value (B = −5.74 cal/cm³). Similarly, T_g‐composition analyses were performed on two other ternary blend systems, PET/PVPh/PTT and PTT/PVPh/PBT. Comparison of the qualitative results showed that the interaction energy densities in the other two ternary blend systems are similarly negative and comparable to the PBT/PVPh/PET ternary blend system. The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy results also support the qualitative findings among these three ternary blend systems. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 1339–1350, 2006     

The structure and physical properties of in situ composites based on semiflexible thermotropic liquid crystalline copolyesteramide and poly(butylene terephthalate)

Liquid crystalline polymer–poly(butylene terephthalate) (LCP/PBT) blends were prepared by melt mixing. The LCP employed was a thermotropic copolyesteramide based on 30 mol % of p‐amino benzoic acid (ABA) and 70 mol % of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). The thermal, dynamic mechanical and rheological properties, morphology, and crystal structure of LCP/PBT blends were studied. The results showed that the semiflexible ABA30/PET LCP is miscible in the melt state with PBT, and they are partial miscible in the solid state. Differential scanning calorimetric measurements showed that the introduction of the semiflexible LCP into LCP/PBT blends retards the crystallization rate of PBT. However, the LCP dispersed phase acted as the sites for the nucleation of spherulites and enhance the degree of crystallinity of PBT. Hot‐stage optical microscopy examination revealed that the LCP microfibers with random orientation are dispersed in the PBT matrix of compression molded LCP/PBT blends. Under the application of a shearing force, the LCP domains in the PBT matrix tended to deform into microfibers, and to orient themselves along the flow direction. The formation of microfibers resulted in an increase of the storage modulus. The torque measurements indicated that the melting viscosity of the LCP/PBT blends is much lower than that of the pure PBT. Finally, the wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction patterns indicated that PBT shows no structural change with the incorporation of LCP, but the apparent crystal sizes of several diffraction planes change significantly. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 403–414, 2000     

Electrical conductivities of carbon nanotube-filled polycarbonate/polyester blends

Carbon nanotube (CNT)-filled polycarbonate (PC)/poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and polycarbonate (PC)/poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) blends containing 1 wt% CNTs over a wide range of blend compositions were prepared by melt mixing in a torque rheometer to investigate the structure-electrical conductivity relationship. Field emission scanning electron microscopy was used to observe the blend morphology and the distribution of CNTs. The latter was compared with the thermodynamic predictions through the calculation of wetting coefficients. It was found that CNTs are selectively localized in the polyester phase and conductive blends can be obtained over the whole composition range (20 wt%, 50 wt% and 80 wt% PBT) for CNT-filled PC/PBT blends, while conductive CNT-filled PC/PET blends can only be obtained when PET is the continuous phase (50 wt%, 80 wt% PET). The dramatic difference in the electrical conductivity between the two types of CNT-filled PC/polyester blends at a low polyester content (20 wt%) was explained by the size difference of the dispersed phases on the basis of the transmission electron microscope micrographs.     

Calorimetric study of blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) and liquid crystalline copolyester

A calorimetric study of blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate-co-p-oxybenzoate), PET/PHB, with poly(butylene terephthalate), PBT has been carried out in the form of as-spun and drawn fibres. DSC melting and crystallization results show that PBT is compatible with LCP and the crystallization of PBT decreases by the addition of LCP in the matrix. The crystallization behaviour of blend fibres is investigated as a function of temperature of crystallization. A detailed analysis of the crystallization course has been made utilizing the Avrami expression. The isothermal calorimetric measurements provide evidence of decrease of rate of crystallization of PBT on addition of the liquid crystalline component up to about 50% by weight. The values of the Avrami exponents change in the temperature range from 200° to 215°C. Dimensionality changes in crystallization could be due to LCP mesophase-transition.     

Melt-crystallization behavior and isothermal crystallization kinetics of crystalline/crystalline blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(trimethylene terephthalate)

The melt-crystallization and isothermal melt-crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(trimethylene terephthalate) blends (PET/PTT) were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy. Although PET and PTT in the binary blends are miscible at amorphous state, they will crystallize individually when cooled from the melt. In the DSC measurements, PET component with higher supercooling degree will crystallize first, and then the crystallite of PET will be the nucleating agent for PTT, which induce the crystallization of PTT at higher temperature. On the other hand, in both blends of PET80/PTT20 and PET60/PTT40, the PET component will crystallize at higher temperature with faster crystallization rate due to the dilute effect of PTT. So the commingled minor addition of one component to another helps to improve the crystallization of the blends. For blends of PET20/PTT80 and PET40/PTT60, isothermal crystallization kinetics evaluated in terms of the Avrami equation suggest different crystallization mechanisms occurred. The more PET content in blends, the fast crystallization rate is. The Avrami exponent, n = 3, suggests a three-dimensional growth of the crystals in both blends, which is further demonstrated by the spherulites formed in all blends. The crystalline blends show multiple-melting peaks during heating process.     

Poly(butylene terephthalate)–polyarylate blends

In this paper we focus on miscible blends of two engineering polymers: poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and a polyarylate (PAr). The issue of transesterification in these blends will be addressed, followed by a discussion of the crystallization kinetics of PBT, poly(ethylene terephthalate) and several PBT/PAr blends. The ability to estimate polymer–polymer interaction parameters in blends from melting point depression will also be discussed. The amorphous phase behavior of the PBT/PAr blends has been explored primarily using dielectric spectroscopy. For blends in which PBT has crystallized, we observe two relaxations associated with T_g-like motion, and this behavior is interpreted in light of our recent work on order–disorder interphases in crystalline blends.     

Phase behavior and structure development in extruded poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) blend

Liquid–liquid phase separation and subsequent homogenization during annealing in an extruded poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) (PEN) blend were investigated with time‐resolved light scattering and optical microscopy. In the initial stage, the domain structure was developed by demixing via spinodal decomposition. In the later stage, the blend was homogenized by transesterification between the two polyesters. The crystallization rate depended on the sequence distribution of polymer chains, which was determined by the level of transesterification rather than the composition change of separated phases. When the crystallization of PEN preceded that of PET, PEN showed a higher melting point. However, when the crystallization rate of PEN was slower than that of PET, the previously formed PET crystals suppressed the crystallization of PEN, causing the coarse crystalline structure of PEN to have a lower melting point. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 2625–2633, 2000     

Preparation and characterization of poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene terephthalate) copolymers via solid‐state and melt polymerization

To increase the T_g in combination with a retained crystallization rate, bis(2‐hydroxyethyl)terephthalate (BHET) was incorporated into poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) via solid‐state copolymerization (SSP). The incorporated BHET fraction depends on the miscibility of BHET in the amorphous phase of PBT prior to SSP. DSC measurements showed that BHET is only partially miscible. During SSP, the miscible BHET fraction reacts via transesterification reactions with the mobile amorphous PBT segments. The immiscible BHET fraction reacts by self‐condensation, resulting in the formation of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) homopolymer. ¹H‐NMR sequence distribution analysis showed that self‐condensation of BHET proceeded faster than the transesterification with PBT. SAXS measurements showed an increase in the long period with increasing fraction BHET present in the mixtures used for SSP followed by a decrease due to the formation of small PET crystals. DSC confirmed the presence of separate PET crystals. Furthermore, the incorporation of BHET via SSP resulted in PBT‐PET copolymers with an increased T_g compared to PBT. However, these copolymers showed a poorer crystallization behavior. The modified copolymer chain segments are apparently fully miscible with the unmodified PBT chains in the molten state. Consequently, the crystal growth process is retarded resulting in a decreased crystallization rate and crystallinity. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 882–899, 2007.     

Poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(ε-caprolactone) blends: Influence of PCL molecular mass on PBT melting and crystallization behavior

The isothermal crystallization kinetics and melting behavior of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) in binary blends with poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) was investigated as a function of PCL molecular mass by differential scanning calorimetry and optical microscopy. The components are miscible in the melt when oligomeric PCL (M_w = 1250) is blended with PBT, whereas only partial miscibility was found in mixtures with higher molecular mass (M_w = 10,000 and 50,000). The equilibrium melting point of PBT in the homopolymer and in blends with PCL was determined through a non-linear extrapolation of the T_m = f(T_c) curve. The PBT spherulitic growth rate and bulk crystallization rate were found to increase with respect to plain PBT in blends with PCL1250 and PCL10000, whereas addition of PCL50000 causes a reduction of PBT solidification rate. The crystallization induction times were determined by differential scanning calorimetry for all the mixtures through a blank subtraction procedure that allows precise estimation of the crystallization kinetics of fast crystallizing polymers. The results have been discussed on the basis of the Hoffman-Lauritzen crystallization theory and considerations on both the transport of chains towards the crystalline growth front and the energy barrier for the formation of critical nuclei in miscible and partially miscible PBT/PCL mixtures are widely debated.     

PET/LCP反应性共混物的非等温结晶动力学

采用DSC方法研究了聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯 (PET)和热致性液晶共聚酯 6 0PHB PET (LCP)体系在少量扩链剂双 (2 唑啉 ) (BOZ)存在下形成的反应性共混物的非等温结晶动力学 .结果表明反应性共混物的Avrami指数均在 3 0～ 4 5之间 ,BOZ的加入使反应共混物中PET组分的结晶速率降低 ;表明BOZ对酯交换的促进作用 ,使所生成的共聚酯中PET嵌段的数均序列长度变短 ,而使结晶在某种程度上较为困难 ,但对体系的成核和结晶生长机理无明显影响 .结果还表明 ,随冷却速率的增大结晶峰向低温方向移动     

Poly(butylene terephthalate)/clay nanocomposite compatibilized with poly(ethylene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate). II. Nonisothermal crystallization

Melting behaviors and nonisothermal crystallization of poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) (PBT/PEGMA), PBT/commercial modified montmorillonite clays (PBT/Clay), and PBT/exfoliated silicates (PBT/PEGMA/Clay) nanocomposites were studied by wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimeter. PEGMA is used as a compatibilizer. For both isothermally and nonisothermally crystallized samples, PEGMA facilitates the recrystallization of PBT during the heating scans, and leads to a less degree of perfection of the crystals. However, the clay hinders the recrystallization growth during heating scans, and increases perfection of the crystals. Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics was described by kinetic models and undercooling was taken into account. The PEGMA would lead to an increase of the blend viscosity, rendering the chains less mobile and lower the crystallizability of PBT in PBT/PEGMA. The well‐dispersed exfoliated silicates in PBT/PEGMA/Clay cause a large number of nuclei to precede crystallization. The fold surface free energy (σ_e) and activation energy also supported the interpretation. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 46: 564–576, 2008     

The effect of annealing on the crystallization of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polycarbonate blends

The effect of annealing on the morphology and subsequent crystallization kinetics of poly (ethylene terephthalate)/polycarbonate blends have been investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), polarized light microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). During annealing transesterification and phase coarsening occurred, and the final properties were compromizes between these two competing effects. Initially, the effect of phase separation dominated and the rate of cold crystallization of PET increased. Transesterification, however, became increasingly important and the rate of crystallization decreased progressively until finally the blend completely lost the ability to crystallize. At this stage in the reaction a single glass transition was observed and uniform glassy material observed in the SEM. The maximum crystallinity of the blend achieved on heating showed the same trend in first increasing and then decreasing with annealing time. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 2129–2136, 2004     

Microphase separation and rheology of a semicrystalline poly(ether-ester) multiblock copolymer

A microphase separation transition (MST) of a thermoplastic elastomer based on soft segments of poly(tetra methylene oxide) and hard crystalline segments of poly(tetra methylene terephthalate) has been studied by means of rheological measurements, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS), showing that the MST is entirely caused by melting/crystallization, and that no separate segmental mixing/demixing transition is involved. DSC and WAXS measurements show that melting starts at 190°C, leading to crystal reorganization effects up to above 200°C, and that a gradual decrease in crystallinity occurs from below 210°C up to 224°C, above which temperature no crystals are left. Rheological measurements reveal a wide MST (207–224°C) upon heating, which coincides perfectly with the melting range. From this coincidence together with the Maxwell fluid behavior directly following the MST, it is concluded that melting leads to a one-phase liquid, and that no separate segmental mixing transition occurs. Similar results are obtained upon cooling, indicating that crystallization is the driving force for phase separation and that no separate segmental demixing step precedes crystallization. The wide MST implies a large processing window over which the rheological properties change from highly elastic, with a distinct yield stress, to normal pseudoplastic, enabling application in preparation of structured blends. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 36: 1795–1804, 1998     

Isothermal crystallization studies of poly(butylene terephthalate) composites

Different crystallization kinetic models (Avrami and Tobin) have been applied to study the crystallization kinetics of virgin poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and filled PBT systems under isothermal experimental conditions. The experimental data have been analyzed with a nonlinear, multivariable regression program. The kinetic parameters for the isothermal crystallization have been determined. The analysis results indicate that both models satisfactorily represent the isothermal crystallization kinetics. PBT crystallizes most slowly. The presence of nanoclays or nanofibers, added as fillers, enhances the crystallization rate of PBT composites. An analysis of the kinetic data with the Avrami and Tobin models has shown little change in the crystallization exponent compared with that of virgin PBT. The crystallization rate constant decreases with a rise in the temperature for the two models. This trend has been observed for similar polyester systems reported in the literature. The dispersion of the clay layers in the PBT nanocomposites has been characterized with wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 45: 1344–1353, 2007     

Rheological behavior in blends of PET with ionomeric polyester

The rheological behavior and the morphology in blends of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) with ionomeric polyester were investigated over a wide range of different blending ratios. The ionomeric polyester is derived from PET modified through copolycondensation with sulfonate moiety, sodiosulfo isophthalate (Na-SIP), iso-phthalic acid (IPA) and polyethylene glycol (PEG). The results showed that the apparent viscosity and non-Newtonian index of the PET/ionomeric polyester blend system had a nonlinearity change with the change of the blend ratio of PET/ionomeric polyester. The anomaly of the viscous flow activation energy change was found as the content of ionomeric polyester was about 40% (w/w) in the blend system, suggesting the presence of physical cross-linked structure formed by strong polar tangling points and the phase separation owing to poor compatibility between the PET and ionomeric polyester. The morphology and thermal behavior of the blends were observed, respectively, with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and atomic force microscopy (AMF).