Interpreting 2hJ(F,N), 1hJ(H,N) and 1J(F,H) in the hydrogen‐bonded FH–collidine complex

Ab initio EOM‐CCSD calculations were performed to determine ¹⁹F,¹H, ¹⁹F,¹⁵N and ¹H,¹⁵N spin–spin coupling constants in model complexes FH–NH₃ and FH–pyridine as a function of the F—H and F—N distances. The absolute value of ¹J(F,H) decreases and that of ^1hJ(H,N) increases rapidly along the proton‐transfer coordinate, even in the region of the proton‐shared F—H—N hydrogen bond. In contrast, ^2hJ(F,N) remains essentially constant in this region. These results are consistent with the recently reported experimental NMR spectra of FH–collidine which show that ^1hJ(H,N) increases and ¹J(F,H) decreases, while ^2hJ(F,N) remains constant as the temperature of the solution decreases. They suggest that the FH–collidine complex is stabilized by a proton‐shared hydrogen bond over the range of experimental temperatures investigated, being on the traditional side of quasi‐symmetric at high temperatures, and on the ion‐pair side at low temperatures. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Experimental and theoretical study of the intramolecular C–H···N and C–H···S hydrogen bonding effects in the 1H and 13C NMR spectra of the 2‐(alkylsulfanyl)‐5‐amino‐1‐vinylpyrroles: a particular state of amine nitrogen

In the ¹H NMR spectra of the 1‐vinylpyrroles with amino‐ and alkylsulfanyl groups in 5 and 2 positions, an extraordinarily large difference between resonance positions of the H_A and H_B terminal methylene protons of the vinyl group is discovered. Also, the one‐bond ¹J(C_β,H_B) coupling constant is surprisingly greater than the ¹J(C_β,H_A) coupling constant in pyrroles under investigation, while in all known cases, there was a reverse relationship between these coupling constants. These spectral anomalies are substantiated by quantum chemical calculations. The calculations show that the amine nitrogen lone pair is removed from the conjugation with the π‐system of the pyrrole ring so that it is directed toward the H_B hydrogen. These factors are favorable to the emergence of the intramolecular C–H_B???N hydrogen bonding in the s‐cis(N) conformation. On the other hand, the spatial proximity of the sulfur to the H_B hydrogen provides an opportunity of the intramolecular C–H_B???S hydrogen bonding in the s‐cis(S) conformation. Presence of the hydrogen bond critical points as well as ring critical point for corresponding chelate ring revealed by a quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) approach confirms the existence of the weak intramolecular C–H???N and C–H???S hydrogen bonding. Therefore, an unusual high‐frequency shift of the H_B signal and the increase in the ¹J(C_β,H_B) coupling constant can be explained by the effects of hydrogen bonding. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

F···HO intramolecular hydrogen bond as the main transmission mechanism for 1hJF,H(O) coupling constant in 2′‐fluoroflavonol

Flavonoids are useful compounds in medicinal chemistry and exhibit conformational isomerism, which is ruled by intramolecular interactions. One of the main intramolecular forces governing the stability of conformations is the hydrogen bond. Hydrogen bond involving fluorine covalently bonded to carbon has been found to be rare, but it appears in 2′‐fluoroflavonol, although the F···HO hydrogen bond cannot be considered the main effect governing the conformational stability of this compound. Because ¹⁹F is magnetically active and suitable for NMR studies, the ^1hJ_F,H(O) coupling constant can be used as a probe for such an interaction in 2′‐fluoroflavonol. In fact, the ^1hJ_F,H(O) coupling was computationally analyzed in this work, and the F···HO hydrogen bond was found to be its main transmission mechanism, which modulates this coupling in 2′‐fluoroflavonol, rather than overlap of proximate electronic clouds, such as in 2‐fluorophenol. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Theoretical study of bifurcated hydrogen bonding effects on the 1J(N,H), 1hJ(N,H), 2hJ(N,N) couplings and 1H, 15N shieldings in model pyrroles

According to the density functional theory calculations, the X···H···N (X?N, O) intramolecular bifurcated (three‐centered) hydrogen bond with one hydrogen donor and two hydrogen acceptors causes a significant decrease of the ^1hJ(N,H) and ^2hJ(N,N) coupling constants across the N? H···N hydrogen bond and an increase of the ¹J(N,H) coupling constant across the N? H covalent bond in the 2,5‐disubsituted pyrroles. This occurs due to a weakening of the N? H···N hydrogen bridge resulting in a lengthening of the N···H distance and a decrease of the hydrogen bond angle at the bifurcated hydrogen bond formation. The gauge‐independent atomic orbital calculations of the shielding constants suggest that a weakening of the N? H···N hydrogen bridge in case of the three‐centered hydrogen bond yields a shielding of the bridge proton and deshielding of the acceptor nitrogen atom. The atoms‐in‐molecules analysis shows that an attenuation of the ^1hJ(N,H) and ^2hJ(N,N) couplings in the compounds with bifurcated hydrogen bond is connected with a decrease of the electron density ρ_H···N at the hydrogen bond critical point and Laplacian of this electron density ?²ρ_H···N. The natural bond orbital analysis suggests that the additional N? H···X interaction partly inhibits the charge transfer from the nitrogen lone pair to the σ*_{N? H} antibonding orbital across hydrogen bond weakening of the ^1hJ(N,H) and ^2hJ(N,N) trans‐hydrogen bond couplings through Fermi‐contact mechanism. An increase of the nitrogen s‐character percentage of the N? H bond in consequence of the bifurcated hydrogen bonding leads to an increase of the ¹J(N,H) coupling constant across the N? H covalent bond and deshielding of the hydrogen donor nitrogen atom. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

GIAO,DFT, AIM and NBO analysis of the N?H···O intramolecular hydrogen‐bond influence on the 1J(N,H) coupling constant in push–pull diaminoenones

In the series of diaminoenones, large high‐frequency shifts of the ¹H NMR of the N? H group in the cis‐position relative to the carbonyl group suggests strong N? H···O intramolecular hydrogen bonding comprising a six‐membered chelate ring. The N? H···O hydrogen bond causes an increase of the ¹J(N,H) coupling constant by 2–4 Hz and high‐frequency shift of the ¹⁵N signal by 9–10 ppm despite of the lengthening of the relevant N? H bond. These experimental trends are substantiated by gauge‐independent atomic orbital and density functional theory calculations of the shielding and coupling constants in the 3,3‐bis(isopropylamino)‐1‐(aryl)prop‐2‐en‐1‐one (12) for conformations with the Z‐ and E‐orientations of the carbonyl group relative to the N? H group. The effects of the N? H···O hydrogen‐bond on the NMR parameters are analyzed with the atoms‐in‐molecules (AIM) and natural bond orbital (NBO) methods. The AIM method indicates a weakening of the N? H···O hydrogen bond as compared with that of 1,1‐di(pyrrol‐2‐yl)‐2‐formylethene (13) where N? H···O hydrogen bridge establishes a seven‐membered chelate ring, and the corresponding ¹J(N,H) coupling constant decreases. The NBO method reveals that the LP(O) →σ*_{N? H} hyperconjugative interaction is weakened on going from the six‐membered chelate ring to the seven‐membered one due to a more bent hydrogen bond in the former case. A dominating effect of the N? H bond rehybridization, owing to an electrostatic term in the hydrogen bonding, seems to provide an increase of the ¹J(N,H) value as a consequence of the N? H···O hydrogen bonding in the studied diaminoenones. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Intermolecular interactions in uracil–nitrous acid complexes: structures,binding energy,topological properties,and nuclear magnetic resonance study

Molecular interactions between uracil and nitrous acid (U–NA) [C₄N₂O₂H₄? NO₂H] have been studied using B3LYP, B3PW91, and MP2 methods with different basis sets. The optimized geometries, harmonic vibrational frequencies, charge transfer, topological properties of electron density, nucleus‐independent chemical shift (NICS), and nuclear magnetic resonance one‐ and two‐bonds spin–spin coupling constants were calculated for U–NA complexes. In interaction between U and NA, eight cyclic complexes were obtained with two intermolecular hydrogen bonds N(C)HU…N(O) and OH_NA…O_U. In these complexes, uracil (U) simultaneously acts as proton acceptor and proton donor. The most stable complexes labeled, UNA1 and UNA2, are formed via NH bond of U with highest acidity and CO group of U with lowest proton affinity. There is a relationship between hydrogen bond distances and the corresponding frequency shifts. The solvent effect on complexes stability was examined using B3LYP method with the aug‐cc‐pVDZ basis set by applying the polarizable continuum model (PCM). The binding energies in the gas phase have also been compared with solvation energies computed using the PCM. Natural bond orbital analysis shows that in all complexes, the charge transfer takes place from U to NA. The results predict that the Lone Pair (LP)(O)_U → σ*(O? H) and LP(N(O)_NA → σ*(N(C)? H)_U donor–acceptor interactions are most important interactions in these complexes. Atom in molecule analysis confirms that hydrogen bond contacts are electrostatic in nature and covalent nature of proton donor groups decreases upon complexation. The relationship between spin–spin coupling constant (^1hJ_H…_Y and ^2hJ_H…_Y) with interaction energy and electronic density at corresponding hydrogen bond critical points and H‐bonds distances are investigated. NICS used for indicating of aromaticity of U ring upon complexation. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Using (FH)2 and (FH)3 to Bridge the σ‐Hole and the Lone Pair at P in Complexes with H2XP,for X=CH3, OH,H, CCH,F, Cl,NC, and CN

Ab initio MP2/aug′‐cc‐pVTZ calculations are used to investigate the binary complexes H₂XP:HF, the ternary complexes H₂XP:(FH)₂, and the quaternary complexes H₂XP:(FH)₃, for X=CH₃, OH, H, CCH, F, Cl, NC, and CN. Hydrogen‐bonded (HB) binary complexes are formed between all H₂XP molecules and FH, but only H₂FP, H₂ClP, and H₂(NC)P form pnicogen‐bonded (ZB) complexes with FH. Ternary complexes with (FH)₂ are stabilized by F?H???P and F?H???F hydrogen bonds and F???P pnicogen bonds, except for H₂(CH₃)P:(FH)₂ and H₃P:(FH)₂, which do not have pnicogen bonds. All quaternary complexes H₂XP:(FH)₃ are stabilized by both F?H???P and F?H???F hydrogen bonds and P???F pnicogen bonds. Thus, (FH)₂ with two exceptions, and (FH)₃ can bridge the σ‐hole and the lone pair at P in these complexes. The binding energies of H₂XP:(FH)₃ complexes are significantly greater than the binding energies of H₂XP:(FH)₂ complexes, and nonadditivities are synergistic in both series. Charge transfer occurs across all intermolecular bonds from the lone‐pair donor atom to an antibonding σ* orbital of the acceptor molecule, and stabilizes these complexes. Charge‐transfer energies across the pnicogen bond correlate with the intermolecular P?F distance, while charge‐transfer energies across F?H???P and F?H???F hydrogen bonds correlate with the distance between the lone‐pair donor atom and the hydrogen‐bonded H atom. In binary and quaternary complexes, charge transfer energies also correlate with the distance between the electron‐donor atom and the hydrogen‐bonded F atom. EOM‐CCSD spin‐spin coupling constants ^2hJ(F–P) across F?H???P hydrogen bonds, and ^1pJ(P–F) across pnicogen bonds in binary, ternary, and quaternary complexes exhibit strong correlations with the corresponding intermolecular distances. Hydrogen bonds are better transmitters of F–P coupling data than pnicogen bonds, despite the longer F???P distances in F?H???P hydrogen bonds compared to P???F pnicogen bonds. There is a correlation between the two bond coupling constants ^2hJ(F–F) in the quaternary complexes and the corresponding intermolecular distances, but not in the ternary complexes, a reflection of the distorted geometries of the bridging dimers in ternary complexes.     

Structural trends of 29Si–1H spin–spin coupling constants across double bond

The calculations of geminal and vicinal ²⁹Si–¹H spin–spin coupling constants across double bond in 15 alkenylmethylsilanes and alkenylchlorosilanes were carried out at the second‐order polarization propagator approach level in a good agreement with experiment. Two structural trends, namely, (i) the geometry of the coupling pathway and (ii) the effect of the electrowithdrawing substituent, have been interpreted in terms of the natural J‐coupling analysis within the framework of the natural bond orbital approach. Thus, the marked difference between cisoidal and transoidal ²⁹Si–¹H spin–spin coupling constants across double bond was accounted for the delocalization contributions including bonding and antibonding Si–C and C–H orbitals, whereas the chlorine effect was explained in terms of the steric contributions including bonding Si–Cl orbitals. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Can One Assess the π Character of a C–C Bond with the Help of the NMR Spin–Spin Coupling Constants?

Measured one‐bond spin–spin coupling constants (SSCC) ¹J(CC) can be used to describe the nature of the C–C bond, provided one is able to separate the various coupling mechanisms leading to ¹J(CC). The Fermi‐contact (FC) term probes the first‐order density at the positions of the coupling nuclei, whereas the noncontact terms (the paramagnetic spin orbit (PSO) and the spin–dipole (SD) terms) probe the π character of the C–C bond (the diamagnetic spin orbit (DSO) term can mostly be neglected). A model is tested, in which the value of the FC(CC) term is estimated with the help of measured SSCCs ¹J(CH). The difference between the measured J(CC) and the estimated FC(CC) values, Δ(CC)=PSO(CC)+SD(CC)+DSO(CC), provides a semiquantitative measure of the π character of a C–C multiple bond. The applicability and limitations of this approach are discussed by partitioning the four Ramsey terms of the SSCC ¹J(CC) into one‐ and two‐orbital contributions. The FC, PSO, and SD terms of ¹J(CC) are explained and analyzed with regard to their relationship to other C–C bond properties. It is shown that empirical relationships between measured SSCCs and the s character of a bond need reconsideration.     

Open‐chain unsaturated selanyl sulfides: stereochemical structure and stereochemical behavior of their 77Se–1H spin–spin coupling constants

Stereochemical structure of nine Z‐2‐(vinylsulfanyl)ethenylselanyl organyl sulfides has been investigated by means of experimental measurements and second‐order polarization propagator approach calculations of their ¹H–¹H, ¹³C–¹H, and ⁷⁷Se–¹H spin–spin coupling constants together with a theoretical conformational analysis performed at the MP2/6‐311G** level. All nine compounds were shown to adopt the preferable skewed s‐cis conformation of their terminal vinylsulfanyl group, whereas the favorable rotational conformations with respect to the internal rotations around the C–S and C–Se bonds of the internal ethenyl group are both skewed s‐trans. Stereochemical trends of ⁷⁷Se–¹H spin–spin coupling constants originating in the geometry of their coupling pathways and the selenium lone pair effect were rationalized in terms of the natural J‐coupling analysis within the framework of the natural bond orbital approach. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

C?H···N and C?H···O intramolecular hydrogen bonding effects in the 1H, 13C and 15 N NMR spectra of the configurational isomers of 1‐vinylpyrrole‐2‐carbaldehyde oxime substantiated by DFT calculations

According to the ¹H, ¹³C and ¹⁵N NMR spectroscopic data and DFT calculations, the E‐isomer of 1‐vinylpyrrole‐2‐carbaldehyde adopts preferable conformation with the anti‐orientation of the vinyl group relative to the carbaldehyde oxime group and with the syn‐arrangement of the carbaldehyde oxime group with reference to the pyrrole ring. This conformation is stabilized by the C? H···N intramolecular hydrogen bond between the α‐hydrogen of the vinyl group and the oxime group nitrogen, which causes a pronounced high‐frequency shift of the α‐hydrogen signal in ¹H NMR (～0.5 ppm) and an increase in the corresponding one‐bond ¹³C–¹H coupling constant (ca 4 Hz). In the Z‐isomer, the carbaldehyde oxime group turns to the anti‐position with respect to the pyrrole ring. The C? H···O intramolecular hydrogen bond between the H‐3 hydrogen of the pyrrole ring and the oxime group oxygen is realized in this case. Due to such hydrogen bonding, the H‐3 hydrogen resonance is shifted to a higher frequency by about 1 ppm and the one‐bond ¹³C–¹H coupling constant for this proton increases by ～5 Hz. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

First example of the correlated calculation of the one‐bond tellurium–carbon spin–spin coupling constants: Relativistic effects,vibrational corrections,and solvent effects

This work reports on the comprehensive calculation of the NMR one‐bond spin–spin coupling constants (SSCCs) involving carbon and tellurium, ¹J(¹²⁵Te,¹³C), in four representative compounds: Te(CH₃)₂, Te(CF₃)₂, Te(C?CH)₂, and tellurophene. A high‐level computational treatment of ¹J(¹²⁵Te,¹³C) included calculations at the SOPPA level taking into account relativistic effects evaluated at the 4‐component RPA and DFT levels of theory, vibrational corrections, and solvent effects. The consistency of different computational approaches including the level of theory of the geometry optimization of tellurium‐containing compounds, basis sets, and methods used for obtainig spin–spin coupling values have also been discussed in view of reproducing the experimental values of the tellurium–carbon SSCCs. Relativistic corrections were found to play a major role in the calculation of ¹J(¹²⁵Te,¹³C) reaching as much as almost 50% of the total value of ¹J(¹²⁵Te,¹³C) while relativistic geometrical effects are of minor importance. The vibrational and solvent corrections account for accordingly about 3–6% and 0–4% of the total value. It is shown that taking into account relativistic corrections, vibrational corrections and solvent effects at the DFT level essentially improves the agreement of the non‐relativistic theoretical SOPPA results with experiment. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

NMR chemical shielding and spin–spin coupling constants across hydrogen bonds in uracil–α-hydroxy-N-nitrosamine complexes

One- and two bond spin–spin coupling constants, ¹ J, ^1h J , and ^2h J across X–H?O hydrogen bonds and shielding constants of bridging hydrogens have been computed for complexes formed from interaction between the α-hydroxy-N-nitrosamine (NP) and four preferential binding sites of the uracil (U) at B3LYP/6-311++G(2d,2p)//MP2/6-311++G(2d,2p) level of theory. All complexes are stabilized by two H_U?O_NP and H_NP?O_U hydrogen bonds. Very good correlations were found between NMR spin–spin coupling constant as well as isotropic shielding constant and the binding energy, H-bond distance, red-shift of vibration frequency, charge transfer energy, and electron density at H-bond critical point.     

Experimental Evidence of Intramolecular CAr–H···O=C Hydrogen Bonds in the Structure of (Diaryl)tetrahydrofuranones Using Spectroscopic Tools

The occurrence of bifurcate H‐bonds C_Ar–H···O=C in the structure of (diaryl)‐tetrahydrofuranones was experimentally demonstrated using different methods and techniques. The consistent increasing spin–spin coupling constants ¹J(C,H) of the ortho‐H‐atoms and low‐field shift of v_C=O in IR spectra of 2,2‐(diaryl)tetrahydrofuran‐3(2H)‐ones relative to their 5,5‐diaryl counterparts, as well as pronounced dependence of the ortho‐C–H H‐atoms chemical shifts on the temperature and solvent polarity along with X‐ray diffraction analysis data unambiguously point to the existence of weak C_Ar–H···O=C H‐bonds in these molecules.     

Structural studies on aryl‐substituted enaminoketones and their thio analogues. Part II. Experimental and DFT calculated carbon–carbon coupling constants,nJ(CC)'s (n = 1–3)

Spin–spin carbon–carbon coupling constants across one, two and three bonds, J(CC), have been measured for a series of aryl‐substituted Z‐s‐Z‐s‐E enaminoketones and their thio analogues. As a result, a large set, altogether 178, of J(CC)s has been obtained. It consists of 82 couplings across one bond, 31 couplings across two bonds and 65 couplings across three bonds. Independently, the DFT calculations at the B3PW91/6‐311++G(d,p)//B3PW91/6‐311++G(d,p) level yielded a set of theoretical J(CC) values. A comparison of these two sets of data gave an excellent linear correlation with parameters a and b close to ideal; a = 0.9978 which is not far from unity and b = 0.22 Hz which is close to zero. The ¹J(CC) couplings determined for the crucial fragment of the molecules, i.e. ? C?C? C?O (or ? C?C? C?S), are: ¹J(C?C) ≈ 68 Hz (67 Hz) and ¹J(C? C) = 60.5 Hz (60.0 Hz). The corresponding couplings found for the Z‐s‐Z‐s‐E isomer of the parent enaminoketone, 4‐methylamino‐but‐3‐en‐2‐one are 64.1 and 59.3 Hz, respectively. The most sensitive towards substitution of the oxygen atom by sulfur are two‐bond couplings between the α‐vinylic and aromatic C_ipso carbon atoms, which attain 12 Hz in the enaminoketone derivatives and decrease to 5 Hz in their thio analogues. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Temperature dependence of the 1J(11B19F) spin–spin coupling in BF3 molecule

The ¹J(¹¹B¹⁹F) spin–spin coupling of gaseous BF₃ was observed in ¹¹B NMR spectra as a function of density in a wide range of temperatures. Following the extrapolation of the measured values to the zero‐density limit, the coupling constant free from intermolecular effects ¹J₀(¹¹B¹⁹F) was obtained for each temperature. In contrast to previous investigations, the final results indicate a nonlinear dependence of ¹J₀(¹¹B¹⁹F) on temperature. In the corresponding ab initio calculations of spin–spin coupling constants performed at the coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) level to obtain a reliable result for this coupling constant we had to take into account large vibrational corrections. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Hydrogen bonding characterization of XH2NH2···HNO(X = B,Al, Ga) complexes: A theoretical investigation

The complexes of XH₂NH₂···HNO(X = B, Al, Ga) are characterized as head to tail with hydrogen bonding interactions. The structural characteristics can be confirmed by atoms in molecules (AIM) analysis, which also provide comparisons of hydrogen bonds strengths. The calculated interaction energies at G2MP2 level show that stability of complexes decrease as BH₂NH₂···HNO > AlH₂NH₂···HNO > GaH₂NH₂···HNO. On the basis of the vibrational frequencies calculations, there are red‐shifts for ν(X1? H) and blue‐shifts for ν(N? H) in the complexes on dihydrogen bonding formations (X1? H···H? N). On hydrogen bonding formations (N? H···O), there are red‐shifts for ν(N? H) compared to the monomers. Natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis is used to discuss the reasons for the ν(X1? H) and ν(N? H) stretching vibrational shifts by hyperconjugation, electron density redistribution, and rehybridization. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2008     

Full four‐component relativistic calculations of the one‐bond 77Se–13C spin‐spin coupling constants in the series of selenium heterocycles and their parent open‐chain selenides

Four‐component relativistic calculations of ⁷⁷Se–¹³C spin–spin coupling constants have been performed in the series of selenium heterocycles and their parent open‐chain selenides. It has been found that relativistic effects play an essential role in the selenium–carbon coupling mechanism and could result in a contribution of as much as 15–25% of the total values of the one‐bond selenium–carbon spin‐spin coupling constants. In the overall contribution of the relativistic effects to the total values of ¹J(Se,C), the scalar relativistic corrections (negative in sign) by far dominate over the spin‐orbit ones (positive in sign), the latter being of less than 5%, as compared to the former (ca 20%). A combination of nonrelativistic second‐order polarization propagator approach (CC2) with the four‐component relativistic density functional theory scheme is recommended as a versatile tool for the calculation of ¹J(Se,C). Solvent effects in the values of ¹J(Se,C) calculated within the polarizable continuum model for the solvents with different dielectric constants (ε 2.2–78.4) are next to negligible decreasing negative ¹J(Se,C) in absolute value by only about 1 Hz. The use of the locally dense basis set approach applied herewith for the calculation of ⁷⁷Se–¹³C spin‐spin coupling constants is fully justified resulting in a dramatic decrease in computational cost with only 0.1–0.2‐Hz loss of accuracy. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Unusual NH Activation of 2‐Aminopyrimidine: Supramolecular Assembly into an AgI Metal–Organic Framework

A rare example of coordination at the amino group of NH₂pym (2‐aminopyrimidine) relevant to N? H activation is described that leads to a novel Ag^I–imide 3D metal–organic framework (MOF). The coordination of Ag^I to NH₂pym produced an electron‐withdrawing effect and thus increased its acidity, which facilitated the N? H activation and the subsequent formation of the Ag–imide bond. A cooperative metalation/deprotonation process for the N? H activation of NH₂pym is suggested. Interestingly, photoluminescence of 1 is switched on at the low temperature of 77 K.     

Magnitude of Finite‐Nucleus‐Size Effects in Relativistic Density Functional Computations of Indirect NMR Nuclear Spin–Spin Coupling Constants

A spherical Gaussian nuclear charge distribution model has been implemented for spin‐free (scalar) and two‐component (spin–orbit) relativistic density functional calculations of indirect NMR nuclear spin–spin coupling (J‐coupling) constants. The finite nuclear volume effects on the hyperfine integrals are quite pronounced and as a consequence they noticeably alter coupling constants involving heavy NMR nuclei such as W, Pt, Hg, Tl, and Pb. Typically, the isotropic J‐couplings are reduced in magnitude by about 10 to 15 % for couplings between one of the heaviest NMR nuclei and a light atomic ligand, and even more so for couplings between two heavy atoms. For a subset of the systems studied, viz. the Hg atom, Hg₂²⁺, and Tl? X where X=Br, I, the basis set convergence of the hyperfine integrals and the coupling constants was monitored. For the Hg atom, numerical and basis set calculations of the electron density and the 1s and 6s orbital hyperfine integrals are directly compared. The coupling anisotropies of TlBr and TlI increase by about 2 % due to finite‐nucleus effects.