Mono(amidinate) rare earth metal bis(alkyl) complexes: Synthesis,structure and their activity for l-lactide polymerization

Alkane elimination reaction between Ln(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(THF)₂ (Ln = Y, Lu) with one equivalent of the amidines with different steric demanding HL ([CyC(N-2,6-ⁱPr₂C₆H₃)₂]H (HL₁), [CyC(N-2,6-Me₂C₆H₃)₂]H (HL₂), [PhC(N-2,6-Me₂C₆H₃)₂]H (HL₃)) in THF afforded a series of mono(amidinate) rare earth metal bis(alkyl) complexes [CyC(N-2,6-ⁱPr₂C₆H₃)₂]Ln(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(THF) (Ln = Y (1), Lu (3)), [CyC(N-2,6-Me₂C₆H₃)₂]Ln(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(THF)₂ (Ln = Y (4), Lu (6)), and [PhC(N-2,6-Me₂C₆H₃)₂]Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(THF)₂ (7) in 75–89% isolated yields. For the early lanthanide metal Nd, THF slurry of NdCl₃ was stirred with three equiv of LiCH₂SiMe₃ in THF, followed by addition of one equiv of the amidines HL₁ or HL₂ gave an “ate” complex [CyC(N-2,6-ⁱPr₂C₆H₃)₂]Nd(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(μ-Cl)Li(THF)₃ (2) in 48% yield and a neutral [CyC(N-2,6-Me₂C₆H₃)₂]Nd(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(THF)₂ (5) in 52% yield, respectively. They were characterized by elemental analysis, FT-IR, NMR spectroscopy (except for 2 and 5 for their strong paramagnetic property). Complexes 2, 3, 4 and 5 were subjected to X-ray single crystal structure determination. These neutral mono(amidinate) rare earth metal bis(alkyl) complexes showed activity towards l-lactide polymerization to give high molecular weight and narrow molecular weight distribution polymers.     

Effects of bulky substituent groups on the Si–Si triple bonding in RSiSiR and the short Ga–Ga distance in Na2[RGaGaR]: A theoretical study

The steric and electronic effects of bulky aryl and silyl groups on the Si–Si triple bonding in RSiSiR and the short Ga–Ga distance in Na₂[RGaGaR] are investigated by density functional calculations. As typical bulky groups, Tbt = C₆H₂-2,4,6-{CH(SiMe₃)₂}₃, Ar′ = C₆H₃-2,6-(C₆H₃-2,6-iPr₂)₂, Ar¹ = C₆H₃-2,6-(C₆H₂-2,4,6-iPr₃)₂, SiMe(SitBu₃)₂, and SiiPrDis₂ (Dis = CH(SiMe₃)₂) are investigated and characterized. The importance of large basis sets is emphasized for density functional calculations.     

Synthesis,structure, spectroscopy and redox energetics of a series of uranium(IV) mixed-ligand metallocene complexes

A series of uranium(IV) mixed-ligand amide–halide/pseudohalide complexes (C₅Me₅)₂U[N(SiMe₃)₂](X) (X = F (1), Cl (2), Br (3), I (4), N₃ (5), NCO (6)), (C₅Me₅)₂U(NPh₂)(X) (X = Cl (7), N₃ (8)), and (C₅Me₅)₂U[N(Ph)(SiMe₃)](X) (X = Cl (9), N₃ (10)) have been prepared by one electron oxidation of the corresponding uranium(III) amide precursors using either copper halides, silver isocyanate, or triphenylphosphine gold(I)azide. Agostic U?H–C interactions and η³-(N,C,C′) coordination are observed for these complexes in both the solid-state and solution. There is a linear correlation between the chemical shift values of the C₅Me₅ ligand protons in the ¹H NMR spectra and the U^IV/U^III reduction potentials of the (C₅Me₅)₂U[N(SiMe₃)₂](X) complexes, suggesting that there is a common origin, that is overall σ-/π-donation from the ancillary (X) ligand to the metal, contributing to both observables. Optical spectroscopy of the series of complexes 1–6 is dominated by the (C₅Me₅)₂U[N(SiMe₃)₂] core, with small variations derived from the identity of the halide/pseudohalide. The considerable π-donating ability of the fluoride ligand is reflected in both the electrochemistry and UV-visible-NIR spectroscopic behavior of the fluoride complex (C₅Me₅)₂U[N(SiMe₃)₂](F) (1). The syntheses of the new trivalent uranium amide complex, (C₅Me₅)₂U[N(Ph)(SiMe₃)](THF), and the two new weakly-coordinating electrolytes, [Pr₄N][B{3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃}₄] and [Pr₄N][B(C₆F₅)₄], are also reported.     

Zirconium complexes of the tridentate bis(aryloxide)-N-heterocyclic-carbene ligand: Chloride and alkyl functionalized derivatives

The disodium salt of a bis(aryloxide)-N-heterocyclic-carbene dianionic ligand, Na₂[L], was prepared by reaction of 1,3-bis(4,6-di-tert-butyl-2-hydroxybenzyl)imidazolium bromide [H₃L]Br with 3 equiv. of NaN(SiMe₃)₂. Reaction of ZrCl₄(thf)₂ with 1 equiv. of Na₂[L] gave a mixture of [L]ZrCl₂(thf) (1) and [L]₂Zr (2). When the amount of Na₂[L] was increased to 2 equiv., the bis(bis(aryloxide)-N-heterocyclic-carbene) complex 2 was obtained in good yield. The dichloro complex 1 is a precursor to organometallic derivatives, and treatment with PhCH₂MgCl or Me₃SiCH₂Li yielded [L]ZrR₂ [R = CH₂Ph (3), CH₂SiMe₃ (4)]. The disodium salt of the ligand Na₂[L] is unstable and undergoes 1,2-benzyl migration, whereas zirconium complexes of the [L]²⁻ ligand are found to be thermally stable in solid and solution. The X-ray crystal structures of 1, 2, and 3 are described.     

Tris(pyrazolyl)borate half-sandwich complexes of trivalent uranium incorporating the [C8H6{SiiPr3-1,4}2]2− and [C8H4{SiiPr3-1,4}2]2− ligands

The reaction of UI₃ in THF with KTp^Me2 and the subsequent addition of [K₂(C₈H₆{SiⁱPr₃-1,4}₂)] or [K₂(C₈H₄{SiⁱPr₃-1,4}₂)] yields dark red [U(κ³-Tp^Me2)(C₈H₆{SiⁱPr₃-1,4}₂)] 1 and purple [U(κ³-Tp^Me2)(C₈H₄{SiⁱPr₃-1,4}₂)] 2, respectively. The ¹H NMR of 1 at room temperature suggests a rigid structure, whereas 2 is fluxional in solution on the NMR timescale. 1 is unreactive towards CO, CO₂ and MeNC under mild conditions; density functional calculations were used to compare the electronic and steric effects of the Tp^Me2 vs. Cp* ligands in mixed sandwich complexes of the type [U(L)(C₈H₆{SiH₃-1,4}₂)] (L = Cp* or (κ³-Tp^Me2)). On heating at 80 °C, 1 reacts with excess MeNC to yield [U(C₈H₆{SiⁱPr₃-1,4}₂)(κ²-dmpz)₂(η¹-CNMe)] 3. The structures of 1–3 have been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction.     

Dinuclear ruthenium(I) complexes of the type [Ru2(CO)4L2] with carboxylate or 2-pyridonate ligands: Evaluation as catalysts for olefin cyclopropanation with diazoacetates

Dinuclear ruthenium(I,I) carboxylate complexes [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ-OOCR)₂]_n (R = CH₃ (1a), C₃H₇ (1b), H (1c), CF₃ (1d)) and 2-pyridonate complex [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ-2-pyridonate)₂]_n (3) catalyze efficiently the cyclopropanation of alkenes with methyl diazoacetate. High yields are obtained with terminal nucleophilic alkenes (styrene, ethyl vinyl ether, α-methylstyrene), medium yields with 1-hexene, cyclohexene, 4,5-dihydrofuran and 2-methyl-2-butene. The E-selectivity of the cyclopropanes obtained from the monosubstituted alkenes and the cycloalkenes decreases in the order 1b > 1a > 1d > 1c. The cyclopropanation of 2-methyl-2-butene is highly syn-selective. Several complexes of the type [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ-L¹)₂]₂ (4) and (5), [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ-L¹)₂L²] (L² = CH₃OH, PPh₃) (6)–(9) and [Ru₂(CO)₄(CH₃CN)₂(μ-L¹)₂] (10) and (11), where L¹ is a 6-chloro- or 6-bromo-2-pyridonate ligand, are also efficient catalysts. Compared with catalyst 3, a halogen substituent at the pyridonate ligand affects the diastereoselectivity of cyclopropanation only slightly.     

Dimeric and monomeric palladium(II) parent-amido (NH2) complexes: Synthesis,characterization, and reactivity

The treatment of [PdL₃(NH₃)]OTf (L₃ = (PEt₃)₂(Ph) (1), (2,6-(Cy₂PCH₂)₂C₆H₃) (3)) with NaNH₂ in THF afforded dimeric and monomeric parent-amido palladium(II) complexes with bridging and terminal NH₂, respectively, anti-[Pd(PEt₃)(Ph)(μ-NH₂)]₂ (2) and Pd(2,6-(Cy₂PCH₂)₂C₆H₃)(NH₂) (4). The dimeric complex 2 crystallizes in the space group P2₁/n with a = 13.228(2) Å, b = 18.132(2) Å, c = 24.745(2) Å, β = 101.41(1)°, and Z = 4. It has been found that there are two crystallographically independent molecules with Pd(1)–Pd(2) and Pd(3)–Pd(4) distances of 2.9594 (10) and 2.9401(9) Å, respectively. The monomeric amido complex 4 protonates from trace amounts of water to give the cationic ammine species [Pd(2,6-(Cy₂PCH₂)₂C₆H₃)(NH₃)]⁺. Complex 4 reacts with diphenyliodonium triflate ([Ph₂I]OTf) to give aniline complex [Pd(2,6-(Cy₂PCH₂)₂C₆H₃)(NH₂Ph)]OTf (5). Reaction of 4 with dialkyl acetylenedicarboxylate (DMAD, DEAD) yields diastereospecific palladium(II) vinyl derivative (Z)–(Pd(Cy₂PCH₂)₂C₆H₃)(CR = CR(NH₂)) (R = CO₂Me (6a), CO₂Et (6b)). Reacting complexes 6a and 6b with p-nitrophenol produces (Pd(Cy₂PCH₂)₂C₆H₃)(OC₆H₄–p-NO₂) (8) and cis-CHR = CR(NH₂), exclusively.     

Organoselenium(II) complexes containing organophosphorus ligands. Crystal and molecular structure of PhSeSP(S)Ph2, [2-{MeN(CH2CH2)2NCH2}C6H4]SeSP(S)R′2 (R′ = Ph,OPri) and [2-{O(CH2CH2)2NCH2}C6H4]SeSP(S)(OPri)2

Arylselenium(II) derivatives of dithiophosphorus ligands of type ArSeSP(S)R₂ [Ar = Ph, R = Ph (1), OPrⁱ (2); 2-[MeN(CH₂CH₂)₂NCH₂]C₆H₄, R = Ph (3), OPrⁱ (4); 2-[O(CH₂CH₂)₂NCH₂]C₆H₄, R = OPrⁱ (6)] were prepared by redistribution reactions between Ar₂Se₂ and [R₂P(S)S]₂. The derivative [2-{O(CH₂CH₂)₂NCH₂}C₆H₄]SeSP(S)Ph₂ (5) was obtained by the salt metathesis reaction between [2-{O(CH₂CH₂)₂NCH₂}C₆H₄]SeCl and NH₄S₂PPh₂. The compounds were investigated by multinuclear (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P, ⁷⁷Se) NMR and infrared spectroscopy. The crystal and molecular structures of 1, 3, 4 and 6 were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. In compounds 3, 4 and 6 the N(1) atom is intramolecularly coordinated to the selenium center, resulting in a T-shaped geometry (hypervalent 10-Se-3 species). The dithiophosphorus ligands act as anisobidentate in 1 and monodentate in 3, 4 and 6. Supramolecular architectures based on intermolecular S?H and N?H contacts between molecular units are formed in the hypervalent derivatives 3 and 4, while in the compounds 1 and 6 the molecules are associated into polymeric chains through either Se?S or O?H contacts, with no further inter-chain interactions.     

Displacement,reduction, and ligand redistribution reactivity of the cationic mono-C5Me5 Ln2+ complexes (C5Me5)Ln(BPh4) (Ln = Sm,Yb)

The reactivity of the mono(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) divalent lanthanide tetraphenylborate complexes, (C₅Me₅)Ln(BPh₄) (Ln = Sm, 1; Yb, 2), was investigated to determine how Ln²⁺ and (BPh₄)^1? reactivity would combine in these species. The (BPh₄)^1? ligand in (C₅Me₅)Yb(BPh₄) can be displaced with KN(SiMe₃)₂ to form the heteroleptic divalent dimer, {(C₅Me₅)Yb[μ-N(SiMe₃)₂]}₂ (3). Both 1 and 2 reduce phenazine to give the bis(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) ligand redistribution products, [(C₅Me₅)₂Ln]₂(μ-C₁₂H₈N₂). 2,2-Bipyridine is reduced by 1 to yield the ligand redistribution product, (C₅Me₅)₂Sm(C₁₀H₈N₂) (4), while 2 does not react with bipyridine. Tert-butyl chloride is reduced by 1 to form the trimetallic pentachloride complex [{(C₅Me₅)(THF)Sm}₃(μ-Cl)₅][BPh₄] (6), in a reaction that appears to use the reductive capacity of both Sm²⁺ and (BPh₄)^1?.     

Reactivity of intramolecularly coordinated aluminum compounds to R3EOH (E = Sn,Si). Remarkable migration of N,C,N and O,C,O pincer ligands

The reaction of organoaluminum compounds containing O,C,O or N,C,N chelating (so called pincer) ligands [2,6-(YCH₂)₂C₆H₃]AlⁱBu₂ (Y = MeO 1, ^tBuO 2, Me₂N 3) with R₃SnOH (R = Ph or Me) gives tetraorganotin complexes [2,6-(YCH₂)₂C₆H₃]SnR₃ (Y = MeO, R = Ph 4, Y = MeO, R = Me 5; Y = ^tBuO, R = Ph 6, Y = ^tBuO, R = Me 7; Y = Me₂N, R = Ph 8, Y = Me₂N, R = Me 9) as the result of migration of O,C,O or N,C,N pincer ligands from aluminum to tin atom. Reaction of 1 and 2 with (ⁿBu₃Sn)₂O proceeded in similar fashion resulting in 10 and 11 ([2,6-(YCH₂)₂C₆H₃]SnⁿBu₃, Y = MeO 10; Y = ^tBuO 11) in mixture with ⁿBu₃SnⁱBu. The reaction 1 and 3 with 2 equiv. of Ph₃SiOH followed another reaction path and ([2,6-(YCH₂)₂C₆H₃]Al(OSiPh₃)₂, Y = MeO 12, Me₂N 13) were observed as the products of alkane elimination. The organotin derivatives 4–11 were characterized by the help of elemental analysis, ESI-MS technique, ¹H, ¹³C, ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectroscopy and in the case 6 and 8 by single crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD). Compounds 12 and 13 were identified using elemental analysis,¹H, ¹³C, ²⁹Si NMR and IR spectroscopy.     

Synthesis,characterization and fluorescence properties of hexanuclear zinc(II) complexes

Two hexanuclear zinc(II) complexes, [Zn₆(L¹)₂(μ₂-OH)₂(μ₂-CH₃COO)₈] · CH₃CN (1 · CH₃CN) and [Zn₆(L²)₂(μ₂-OH)₂(μ₂-CH₃COO)₈] · 4CH₃CN (2 · 4CH₃CN), where HL¹ = 4-methyl-2,6-bis(cyclohexylmethyliminomethyl)-phenol and HL² = 4-methyl-2,6-bis(1-naphthalylmethyliminomethyl)-phenol, have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, FT-IR and fluorescence spectroscopic methods, and by X-ray diffraction analysis. In the asymmetric unit of complex 1, two of the three zinc atoms have pentacoordinate geometries and the other is tetrahedrally coordinated, whereas the three distinct Zn atoms in complex 2 adopt three different coordination environments, namely distorted octahedral, trigonal bipyramidal and tetrahedral. The fluorescence properties of the ligands and complexes have been investigated.     

Synthesis,X-ray structure and reactivity of μ-(CF3COO)2-[Mo(N-2,6-i-Pr2-C6H3)(CHCMe2Ph)(OOCCF3)(Et2O)]2, the first Bis(trifluoroacetate) derivative of a Schrock catalyst

Reaction of Mo(N-2,6-i-Pr₂-C₆H₃)(CHCMe₂C₆H₅)(OSO₂CF₃)(DME) (DME = 1,2-dimethoxyethane) with 2 equiv. of CF₃COOK yields μ-(CF₃COO)₂-[Mo(N-2,6-i-Pr₂-C₆H₃)(CHCMe₂Ph)(OOCCF₃)(Et₂O)]₂ (1). Compound 1 crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pna2₁ with a = 17.2485(3), b = 17.0336(3), c = 25.4031(5) Å, α = β = γ = 90°, V = 7463.5(2) Å³, Z = 4. In contrast to alkoxide based Schrock type initiators, 1 is virtually inactive in numerous metathesis reactions including ring-closing metathesis (RCM) and homo metathesis reactions, the cyclopolymerization of 1,6-heptadiynes, and even ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of norborn-2-ene. However, addition of quinuclidine results in the in situ formation of 1a (Mo(N-2,6-i-Pr₂-C₆H₃)(CHCMe₂C₆H₅)(OOCCF₃)₂(quinuclidine) which displays moderate activity in ROMP, cyclopolymerization of 1,6-heptadiynes and RCM. Theoretical investigations carried out on the B3LYP/LACVP¹ level provide substantial explanation for these findings.     

Yttrium bis(alkyl) and bis(amido) complexes bearing N,O multidentate ligands. Synthesis and catalytic activity towards ring‐opening polymerization of L‐lactide

Methoxy‐modified β‐diimines HL ¹ and HL ² reacted with Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(THF)₂ to afford the corresponding bis(alkyl)s [L¹Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₂] ( 1 ) and [L²Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₂] ( 2 ), respectively. Amination of 1 with 2,6‐diisopropyl aniline gave the bis(amido) counterpart [L¹Y{N(H)(2,6‐iPr₂? C₆H₃)}₂] ( 3 ), selectively. Treatment of Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(THF)₂ with methoxy‐modified anilido imine HL ³ yielded bis(alkyl) complex [L³Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(THF)] ( 4 ) that sequentially reacted with 2,6‐diisopropyl aniline to give the bis(amido) analogue [L³Y{N(H)(2,6‐iPr₂? C₆H₃)}₂] ( 5 ). Complex 2 was “base‐free” monomer, in which the tetradentate β‐diiminato ligand was meridional with the two alkyl species locating above and below it, generating tetragonal bipyramidal core about the metal center. Complex 3 was asymmetric monomer containing trigonal bipyramidal core with trans‐arrangement of the amido ligands. In contrast, the two cis‐located alkyl species in complex 4 were endo and exo towards the O,N,N tridentate anilido‐imido moiety. The bis(amido) complex 5 was confirmed to be structural analogue to 4 albeit without THF coordination. All these yttrium complexes are highly active initiators for the ring‐opening polymerization of L ‐LA at room temperature. The catalytic activity of the complexes and their “single‐site” or “double‐site” behavior depend on the ligand framework and the geometry of the alkyl (amido) species in the corresponding complexes. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 5662–5672, 2007     

Intramolecularly donor-stabilized silenes: Part 6. The synthesis of 1-[2,6-bis(dimethylaminomethyl)phenyl]silenes and their reaction with aromatic aldehydes

The intramolecularly donor-stabilized silenes ArR¹SiC(SiMe₃)₂ (3a–d) (3a: R¹ = Me; 3b: R¹ = t-Bu; 3c: R¹ = Ph; 3d: R¹ = SiMe₃; Ar = 2,6-(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃) were prepared by treatment of the (dichloromethyl)oligosilanes (Me₃Si)₂R¹Si–CHCl₂ (1a–d), with 2,6-bis(dimethylaminomethyl)phenyllithium (molar ratio 1:2). For 3c and 3d, X-ray structural analyses were performed indicating that only one dimethylamino group of the tridentate ligand is coordinated to the electrophilic silene silicon atoms, i.e., the central silicon atoms are tetracoordinated. The N → Si donation leads to pyramidalization at the silene silicon atoms; the configuration at the silene carbon atoms is planar. For a chemical characterization 3a and 3c were treated with water to give the silanols ArR¹Si(OH)–CH(SiMe₃)₂ (5a,c). Studies of the reactions of 3a and 3c with benzaldehyde, 4-chlorobenzaldehyde or 4-methoxybenzaldehyde, respectively, revealed an unexpected reaction path leading to the substituted 2-oxa-1-sila-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalenes 12a, 12c, 13 and 14. Both 12a and 12c were structurally characterized by X-ray analyses. The formation of these six-membered cyclic compounds, which is discussed in detail, gives support to a dipolar mechanism for the general reaction of silenes with carbonyl derivatives.     

Reaction of the RuTp(PR3)Cl fragment with alkynols: Formation of carbene,vinylidene, allenylidene,and carbyne complexes

The reaction of RuTp(COD)Cl (1) with PR₃ (PR₃ = PPh₂ⁱPr, PⁱPr₃, PPh₃) and propargylic alcohols HCCCPh₂OH, HCCCFc₂OH (Fc = ferrocenyl), and HCCC(Ph)MeOH has been studied.In the case of PR₃ = PPh₂ⁱPr, PⁱPr₃ and HCCCPh₂OH, the 3-hydroxyvinylidene complexes RuTp(PPh₂ⁱPr)(CCHC(Ph)₂OH)Cl (2a) and RuTp(PⁱPr₃)(CCHC(Ph₂)OH)Cl (2b) were isolated.With PR₃ = PPh₂ⁱPr and HCCCFc₂OH as well as with PR₃ = PPh₃ and HCCCPh₂OH dehydration takes place affording the allenylidene complexes RuTp(PPh₂ⁱPr)(CCCFc₂)Cl (3b) and RuTp(PPh₃)(CCCPh₂)Cl (3c).Similarly, with PPh₂ⁱPr and HCCC(Ph)MeOH rapid elimination of water results in the formation of the vinylvinylidene complex RuTp(PPh₂ⁱPr)(CCHC(Ph)CH₂)Cl (4).In contrast to the reactions of the RuTp(PR₃)Cl fragment with propargylic alcohols, with HCC(CH₂)_nOH (n = 2, 3, 4, 5) six-, and seven-membered cyclic oxycarbene complexes RuTp(PR₃)(C₄H₆O)Cl (5), RuTp(PR₃)(C₅H₈O)Cl (6), and RuTp(PR₃)(C₆H₁₀O)Cl (7) are obtained. On the other hand, with 1-ethynylcyclohexanol the vinylvinylidene complex RuTp(PPh₂ⁱPr)(CCHC₆H₉)Cl (8) is formed. The reaction of the allenylidene complexes 3a–c with acid has been investigated. Addition of CF₃COOH to a solution of 3a–c resulted in the reversible formation of the novel RuTp vinylcarbyne complexes [RuTp(PPh₂ⁱPr)(C–CHCPh₂)Cl]⁺ (9a), [RuTp(PPh₂ⁱPr)(C–CHCFc₂)Cl]⁺ (9b), and [RuTp(PPh₃)(C–CHCPh₂)Cl]⁺ (9c). The structures of 3a, 3b, and 5b have been determined by X-ray crystallography.     

An unusual organoyttrium alkyl complex containing a [C5HMe3(η(3)-CH2)-C5H4N-κ]- ligand and an elusive cyclopentadienide-based scandium tuck-over zwitterion obtained by C-H bond activation

The acid–base reaction between Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂ and the pyridyl‐functionalized cyclopentadienyl (Cp) ligand C₅Me₄H? C₅H₄N (1 equiv) at 0 °C afforded a mixture of two products: (η⁵:κ‐C₅Me₄? C₅H₄N)Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(thf) ( 1 a ) and (η⁵:κ‐C₅Me₄? C₅H₄N)₂YCH₂SiMe₃ ( 1 b ), in a 5:2 ratio. Addition of the same ligand (2 equiv) to Y(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂, however, generated 1 b together with the novel complex 1 c , the first well defined yttrium mono(alkyl) complex (η⁵:κ‐C₅Me₄? C₅H₄N)[C₅HMe₃(η³‐CH₂)‐C₅H₄N‐κ]Y(CH₂SiMe₃) containing a rare κ/η³‐allylic coordination mode in which the C? H bond activation occurs unexpectedly with the allylic methyl group rather than conventionally on Cp ring. If the central metal was changed to lutetium, the equimolar reaction between Lu(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂ and C₅Me₄H? C₅H₄N exclusively afforded the bis(alkyl) product (η⁵:κ‐C₅Me₄? C₅H₄N)Lu(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(thf) ( 2 a ). Similarly, the reaction between the ligand (2 equiv) and Lu(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂ gave the mono(alkyl) complex (η⁵:κ‐C₅Me₄? C₅H₄N)₂LuCH₂SiMe₃ ( 2 b ), in which no ligand redistribution was observed. Strikingly, treatment of Sc(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂ with C₅Me₄H? C₅H₄N in either 1:1 or 1:2 ratio at 0 °C generated the first cyclopentadienide‐based scandium zwitterionic “tuck‐over” complex 3 , (η⁵:κ‐C₅Me₄? C₅H₄N)Sc(thf)[μ‐η⁵:η¹:κ‐C₅Me₃(CH₂)‐C₅H₄N]Sc(CH₂SiMe₃)₃. In the zwitterion, the dianionic ligand [C₅Me₃(CH₂)‐C₅H₄N]^2? binds both to Sc1³⁺ and to Sc2³⁺, in η⁵ and η¹/κ modes. In addition, the reaction chemistry, the molecular structures, and the mechanism are also discussed in detail.     

Luminescent coordination polymers with extended Au(I)–Ag(I) interactions supported by a pyridyl-substituted NHC ligand

Reaction of [Ag(CH₃impy)₂]PF₆, 1, with Au(tht)Cl produces the monometallic Au(I)-species [Au(CH₃impy)₂]PF₆, 2. Treatment of 2 with excess AgBF₄ in acetonitrile, benzonitrile or benzylnitrile produces the polymeric species {[AuAg(CH₃impy)₂(L)](BF₄)₂}_n, (L = CH₃CN,3; L = C₆H₅CN, 4; L = C₆H₅CH₂CN, 5) where the Au(I) centers remain bound to two carbene moieties while the Ag(I) centers are coordinated to two alternating pyridyl groups and a solvent molecule (L). Reaction of 2 with AgNO₃ in acetonitrile produces the zig-zag mixed-metal polymer {[AuAg(CH₃impy)₂(NO₃)]NO₃}_n, 6, that contains a coordinated nitrate ion in place of the coordinated solvent species. All of these polymeric materials are dynamic in solution and dissociate into their respective monometallic components. Compounds 2–6 are intensely luminescent in the solid-state and in frozen solution. All of these complexes were characterized by ¹H, ¹³C NMR, electronic absorption and emission spectroscopy and elemental analysis.     

Reactions of β-diketiminatoaluminum hydrides with tert-butyl hydrogenperoxide – Facile formation of dialuminoxanes containing Al–O–Al groups

Treatment of diphenyl-β-diketiminatoaluminum dihydride, LAlH₂ [1, L = {H₅C₆–NC(Me)}₂CH] with neopentyl- or trimethylsilylmethyllithium afforded the corresponding alkylderivatives LAlH(R) [R = CH₂–SiMe₃ (2), CH₂–CMe₃ (3)] by the precipitation of lithium hydride. Deprotonation of a methyl group instead of salt elimination occurred by the similar reaction of the more basic alkyllithium compound LiC(SiMe₃)₃. The reactions of the hydrides 1–3 with tert-butyl hydrogenperoxide did not yield the expected peroxo derivatives, instead the dialuminoxanes LAl(R)–O–Al(R)L [R = OCMe₃ (5), CH₂SiMe₃ (6), CH₂CMe₃ (7)] were isolated in high yields. Their Al–O–Al bridges deviated from linearity and had Al–O–Al bond angles of about 155° on average.     

[Ni(iPr2Im)2Br2]: A Convenient Entry into NHC Nickel ­Chemistry

The reaction of the NHC iPr₂Im [NHC=N‐heterocyclic carbene, iPr₂Im = 1, 3‐bis(isopropyl)imidazolin‐2‐ylidene] with freshly prepared NiBr₂ in thf or dme results in the formation of the air stable nickel(II) complex trans‐[Ni(iPr₂Im)₂Br₂] ( 2 ). Complex 2 was structurally characterized. Thermal analysis (DTA/TG) reveals a very high decomposition temperature of 298 °C. Reduction of 2 with sodium or C₈K in the presence of the olefins COD (cyclooctadiene) or COE (cyclooctene) affords the highly reactive compounds [Ni₂(iPr₂Im)₄(COD)] ( 1 ) and [Ni(iPr₂Im)₂(COE)] ( 4 ). Alkylation of 2 with organolithiums leads to the formation of trans‐[Ni(iPr₂Im)₂(R)₂] [R = Me ( 5 ), CH₂SiMe₃ ( 6 )], whereas the reaction of 2 with LiCp* [Cp* = (η⁵‐C₅(CH₃)₅)] at 80 °C causes the loss of one NHC ligand and affords [(η⁵‐C₅(CH₃)₅)Ni(iPr₂Im)Br] ( 7 ).     

Synthesis,structure and magnetic properties of {Mn5(OC(O)CH3)6(OC(O)C6H5)4}∞

The ligand exchange reaction between Mn(OC(O)CH₃)₂ and benzoic acid under solvothermal conditions in toluene at 110 °C yields colorless crystals of {Mn₅(OC(O)CH₃)₆(OC(O)C₆H₅)₄}_∞ (1). The asymmetric unit of this complex is Mn_2.5(OC(O)CH₃)₃(OC(O)C₆H₅)₂ with each of the three different Mn(II) atoms in 6-fold coordination and one of the benzoate ligands exhibiting the rare μ₃-symmetric bridging mode (O–Mn–O angle = 57°). The structure consists of edge-shared Mn₁₂ loops arranged in a honeycomb-like 2D sheet with the acetate ligands displaced slightly out of the plane. The sheets are spaced at 12 Å and linked into a 3D network via weak intersheet interactions. Magnetic susceptibility characterization of 1 indicates antiferromagnetic exchange with a Weiss constant of −165 K and a transition toward ferromagnetic exchange below 10 K corroborated with a finite imaginary component in the variable temperature susceptibility data.