A family of difference sets in non-cyclic groups

A construction is given for difference sets in certain non-cyclic groups with the parameters $\text{v = q}{}^{\mathrm{s+1}}\text{{[}\text{(q}{}^{\mathrm{s+1}}\text{? 1)}\text{(q ? 1)}\text{] + 1}}$, $\text{k = q}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{(q}{}^{\mathrm{s+1}}\text{? 1)}\text{(q ? 1)}$, $\text{λ = q}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{(q}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{? 1)}\text{(q ? 1)}$, n = q^2s for every prime power q and every positive integer s. If q^s is odd, the construction yields at least $\text{1}\text{2}\text{(q}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{+ 1)}$ inequivalent difference sets in the same group. For q = 5, s = 2 a difference set is obtained with the parameters (v, k, λ, n) = (4000, 775, 150, 625), which has minus one as a multiplier.     

Factorization of fredholm operators on analytic functions

Let Ω be a simply connected domain in the complex plane, and $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$, the space of functions which are defined and analytic on $\text{Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, if K is the operator on elements $\text{u(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{of}\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of the kernels k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by is the identity operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, then the operator I ? K may be factored in the form (I ? K)(M ? W) = (I ? ΠK)(M ? ΠW). Here, W is an operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of a kernel w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by Wu = ∝_an^tw(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠW is the operator; ΠWu = ∝_{an ? 1}w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠK is the operator; ΠKu = ∑_{i = 1}^{n ? 1} ∝_ai^tk_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) ds + ∝_{an ? 1}^tk_n(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. The operator M is of the form m(t, a₁, …, a_n)I, where $\text{m ? A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ and maps elements of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ into itself by multiplication. The function m is uniquely derived from K in the following manner. The operator K defines an operator $\text{K}{}^1$ on functions u in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$, by . A determinant $\text{δ(I ? K}{}^1\text{)}$ of the operator $\text{I ? K}{}^1$ is defined as an element $\text{m}{}^1\text{(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$. This is mapped into $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ by setting a_{n + 1} = t to give m(t, a₁, …, a_n). The operator I ? ΠK may be factored in similar fashion, giving rise to a chain factorization of I ? K. In some cases all the matrix kernels k_i defining K are separable in the sense that k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) = P_i(t, a₁, …, a_n) Q_i(s, a₁, …, a_n), where P_i is a 1 × p_i matrix and Q_i is a p_i × 1 matrix, each with elements in $\text{A(Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, explicit formulas are given for the kernels of the factors W. The various results are stated in a form allowing immediate extension to the vector-matrix case.     

The Dirichlet problem for the Kohn Laplacian on the Heisenberg group,I

For (x,y,t)∈$\text{R}$ⁿ × $\text{R}$ⁿ × $\text{R}$, denote $\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{=}\text{?}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ 2y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{, y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{=}\text{?}\text{?y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{? 2x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{?t}$ and $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{=?}\text{1}\text{4}\text{∑}\text{j=1}\text{n}\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{j}}{}^2\text{+ Y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}{}^2\text{+}\text{?}\text{?t}$. When α = n ? 2q, $\text{L}$_a represents the action of the Kohn Laplacian □_b on q-forms on the Heisenberg group. For ?n < α < n, we construct a parametrix for the Dirichlet problem in smooth domains D near non-characteristic points of ?D. A point w of ?D is non-characteristic if one of X₁,…, X_n, Y₁,…, Y_n is transverse to ?D at w. This yields sharp local estimates in the Dirichlet problem in the appropriate non-isotropic Lipschitz classes. The main new tool is a “convolution calculus” of pseudo-differential operators that can be applied to the relevant layer potentials, for which the usual asymptotic composition formula is false. Characteristic points are treated in Part II.     

On the average depth of a prefix of the Dycklanguage D1

If D₁ is the Dycklanguage with one type of bracket then the level of a bracket in a word w ∈ D₁ is defined as the number of preceding opening brackets minus the number of preceding closing brackets. The depth of a Dyckword w is the maximum level of a bracket appearing in w. In this paper we derive an explicit expression for the average depth of a prefix of length n of the Dycklanguage D₁ and show that the average depth is given for all ε>0 by

$\text{(ln2)}\text{2πn}\text{?}\text{3}\text{2}\text{+}\text{1}\text{8}\text{2π}\text{n}\text{[4ln2?(?1)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(2ln2?1)]+O(}\text{ln n}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{1.5?\; ?}}$

. The variance is asymptotically for all ?>0

$\text{(}\text{π}\text{3}\text{?2 ln}{}^2\text{2)πn+}\text{5π}{}^2\text{18}\text{?2πln}{}^2\text{2+}\text{1}\text{12}\text{?π(?1)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(}\text{π}\text{24}\text{? ln}{}^2\text{2+}\text{1}\text{2}\text{ln2)+O(}\text{ln n}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{1??}}$

. Furthermore, we derive several enumeration results describing the distribution of the number of certain prefixes of length n.     

A novel solution of a lateral connection problem

Weber's parabolic cylinder equation, $\text{(}\text{d}{}^2\text{y}\text{dz}{}^2\text{) + [v +}\text{1}\text{2}\text{? (}\text{z}{}^2\text{4}\text{)] y = 0}$, (1) has as solutions the parabolic cylinder functions, $\text{D}{}_{\mathrm{v}}\text{(z) ~ z}{}^{\mathrm{v}}\text{exp}\text{(?}\text{z}{}^2\text{4}\text{)}$, z → + ∞. (7) The expansion (7) is generally not valid for z → ? ∞. This situation leads to the so-called “lateral connection problem” for (1). A novel method of solution of this problem based on the Hadamard factorization theorem applied to the “lateral connection coefficient” is given. Unlike previous methods, explicit contour integrals for D_v(z) are not required.     

On the matrix ring over a finite field

Let F_n be the ring of n × n matrices over the finite field F; let o(F_n) be the number of elements in F_n, and s(F_n) be the number of singular matrices in F_n. We prove that $\text{o(F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)<s(F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1+1</mtext><mtext>n(n-1)</mtext>}}$ if n ? 2, and if n = 2 and o(F) ? 3, then .     

The Dirichlet problem for the Kohn Laplacian on the Heisenberg group,II

Let L = ∑_{j = 1}^mX_j² be sum of squares of vector fields in $\text{R}$ⁿ satisfying a Hörmander condition of order 2: span{X_j, [X_i, X_j]} is the full tangent space at each point. A point x??D of a smooth domain D is characteristic if X₁,…, X_m are all tangent to ?D at x. We prove sharp estimates in non-isotropic Lipschitz classes for the Dirichlet problem near (generic) isolated characteristic points in two special cases: (a) The Grushin operator $\text{?}{}^2\text{?x}{}^2\text{+ x}{}^2\text{?}{}^2\text{?t}{}^2$ in $\text{R}$². (b) The real part of the Kohn Laplacian on the Heisenberg group $\text{∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; ?\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(}\text{?}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ 2y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{)}{}^2\text{+ (}\text{?}\text{?y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{? 2x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{)}{}^2$ in $\text{R}$^{2n + 1}. In contrast to non-characteristic points, C^∞ regularity may fail at a characteristic point. The precise order of regularity depends on the shape of ?D at x.     

On a geometrical method of construction of maximal t-linearly independent sets

The problem of constructing a maximal t-linearly independent set in V(r; s) (called a maximal L_t(r, s)-set in this paper) is a very important one (called a packing problem) concerning a fractional factorial design and an error correcting code where V(r; s) is an r-dimensional vector space over a Galois field GF(s) and s is a prime or a prime power. But it is very difficult to solve it and attempts made by several research workers have been successful only in special cases.In this paper, we introduce the concept of a {Σ_α=1^kw_α, m; t, s}-min · hyper with weight (w₁, w₂,…, w_k) and using this concept and the structure of a finite projective geometry PG(n ? 1, s), we shall give a geometrical method of constructing a maximal L_t(t + r, s)-set with length t + r + n for any integers r, n, and s such that n ? 3, n ? 1 ? r₀ ? n + s ? 2 and r₁ ? 1, where r = (r₁ + 1)v_n?1 ? r₀ and $\text{v}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=}\text{(s}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{? 1)}\text{(s ? 1)}$.     

Matrix identities of the fast fourier transform

Let A_n(ω) be the nxn matrix A_n(ω)=(a_ij with a_ij=ω^ij, 0?i,j?n?1, ωⁿ=1. For n=rs we show

$\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(w)P}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{r}}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{∵}\text{0}\text{s?1}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{(w}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{{T}{}_{\mathrm{r}}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{(w)}}\text{∵}\text{0}\text{r?1}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(w}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{)}$

=(A_r?I_s)T^s_r(I_r?A_s). When r and s are relatively prime this identity implies a wide class of identities of the form PA_n(ω)Q^T=A_r(ω^αs)?A_s(ω^βr). The matrices P^s_r, P^r_s, P, and Q are permutation matrices corresponding to the “data shuffling” required in a computer implementation of the FFT, and T^s_r is a diagonal matrix whose nonzeros are called “twiddle factors.” We establish these identities and discuss their algorithmic significance.     

Analytic inequalities with applications to special functions

Sharp inequalities are derived for certain (polynomial-like) functions of the real variables p_i (i = 1(1)σ) by interpreting p_i as the probabilities that various switches be thrown in certain directions. Parameters m_v in the inequalities are at first taken to be integers; later the inequalities are established when m_v are arbitrary real numbers. The side condition ∑p_i = 1 occurs throughout analysis, so there are many corollaries. Examples of the inequalities established are

$\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{σ}\text{(1?p}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{>K?1,}$

valid ifm>1

$\text{∑}\text{j=0}\text{r}\text{n}\text{j}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{jm}}\text{(1?p}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{m?j}}\text{+}\text{1?}\text{∑}\text{j=0}\text{r}\text{n}\text{j}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{j}}\text{(1?p?s)}{}^{\mathrm{n?j}}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{> 1+s}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>max</mtext><mtext>[m,n]</mtext>}}$

valid if m > 1, n > r + 1, 0 < p, s, p + s ? 1, and also valid if $\text{0 < m < 1, 0 < n < r + 1 (1 ? x)}{}^{\mathrm{u}}\text{+ x}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>u</mtext>}}\text{< 1,}\text{if}\text{1}\text{2}\text{< x < 1, u > 1}$. (1.03)     

Sobolev inequalities with remainder terms

The usual Sobolev inequality in $\text{R}$ⁿ, n ? 3, asserts that , with S_n being the sharp constant. This paper is concerned, instead, with functions restricted to bounded domains Ω ? $\text{R}$ⁿ. Two kinds of inequalities are established: (i) If ? = 0 on ?Ω, then with $\text{p =}\text{2}{}^1\text{2}$ and with $\text{q =}\text{n}\text{(n ? 1)}$. (ii) If ? ≠ 0 on ?Ω, then with $\text{q =}\text{2(n ? 1)}\text{(n ? 2)}$. Some further results and open problems in this area are also presented.     

Phase reconstruction from magnitude of band-limited multidimensional signals

In this paper, the problem of phase reconstruction from magnitude of multidimensional band-limited functions is considered. It is shown that any irreducible band-limited function f(z₁…,z_n), z_i ? $\text{C}$, i=1, …, n, is uniquely determined from the magnitude of f(x₁…,x_n): | f(x₁…,x_n)|, x_i ? $\text{R}$, i=1,…, n, except for (1) linear shifts: ^{i(α1z1+…+α_n2n+β}), β, α_i?$\text{R}$, i=1,…, n; and (2) conjugation: $\text{f}{}^1\text{(z}{}_1{}^1\text{,…,z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^1\text{)}$.     

On the number of zeros of diagonal cubic forms

Let M_s, be the number of solutions of the equation

$\text{X}{}_1{}^3\text{+ X}{}_2{}^3\text{+ … + X}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^3\text{=0}$

in the finite field GF(p). For a prime p ≡ 1(mod 3),

$\text{∑}\text{s=1}\text{∞}\text{M}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{X}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{=}\text{x}\text{1 ? px}\text{+}\text{x}{}^2\text{(p ? 1)(2 + dx)}\text{1 ? 3px}{}^2\text{? pdx}{}^3$

,

$\text{M}{}_3\text{= p}{}^2\text{+ d(p ? 1)}$

, and

$\text{M}{}_4\text{= p}{}^2\text{+ 6(p}{}^2\text{? p)}$

. Here d is uniquely determined by

$\text{4}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{= d}{}^2\text{+ 27b}{}^2\text{and}\text{d ≡ 1(}\text{mod}\text{3)}$

.     

On Lp estimates for the wave equation

New and more elementary proofs are given of two results due to W. Littman: (1) Let $\text{n ? 2, p ?}\text{2n}\text{(n ? 1)}$. The estimate $\text{∫∫ (¦▽u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx dt ? C ∫∫ ¦□u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{dx dt}$ cannot hold for all u?C₀^∞(Q), Q a cube in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mi\; mathvariant="italic"\; is="true">n</mi>}}\text{× R}$, some constant C. (2) Let n ? 2, p ≠ 2. The estimate $\text{∫ (¦▽(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx ? C(t) ∫ (¦▽u(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx}$ cannot hold for all C^∞ solutions of the wave equation □u = 0 in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{x R}$; all t ?$\text{R}$; some function C: $\text{R}$ → $\text{R}$.     

Barriers for uniformly elliptic equations and the exterior cone condition

We consider the mixed boundary value problem $\text{Au = f}\text{in}\text{Ω, B}{}_0\text{u = g}{}_0\text{in}\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{, B}{}_1\text{u = g}{}_1\text{in}\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$, where Ω is a bounded open subset of $\text{R}$ⁿ whose boundary Γ is divided into disjoint open subsets Γ⁺ and Γ^? by an (n ? 2)-dimensional manifold ω in Γ. We assume A is a properly elliptic second order partial differential operator on $\text{Ω}$ and B_j, for j = 0, 1, is a normal jth order boundary operator satisfying the complementing condition with respect to A on $\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$. The coefficients of the operators and Γ⁺, Γ^? and ω are all assumed arbitrarily smooth. As announced in [Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.83 (1977), 391–393] we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of the coefficients of the operators for the mixed boundary value problem to be well posed in Sobolev spaces. In fact, we construct an open subset $\text{T}$ of the reals such that, if $\text{D}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{= {u ? H}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{(Ω): Au = 0}}$ then for $\text{s ? =}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(}\text{mod}\text{1), (B}{}_0\text{,B}{}_1\text{): D}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{→ H}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>s\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(Γ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{) × H}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>s\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{)}$ is a Fredholm operator if and only if s ∈$\text{T}$ . Moreover, $\text{T}$ = ?_xew$\text{T}$_x, where the sets $\text{T}$_x are determined algebraically by the coefficients of the operators at x. If n = 2, $\text{T}$_x is the set of all reals not congruent (modulo 1) to some exceptional value; if n = 3, $\text{T}$_x is either an open interval of length 1 or is empty; and finally, if n ? 4, $\text{T}$_x is an open interval of length 1.     

On the analytic continuation of a certain Dirichlet series

A Dirichlet series associated with a positive definite form of degree δ in n variables is defined by

$\text{D}{}_{\mathrm{F}}\text{(s,p,α)}\text{=}\text{∑}\text{α∈Z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{?{0}}\text{F(α)}{}^{\mathrm{?s}}\text{e(ρF(α)+〈α, α〉)}$

where ? ∈ $\text{Q}$, α ∈ $\text{Q}$ⁿ, 〈x, y〉 = x₁y₁ + ? + x_ny_n, e(a) = exp (2πia) for a ∈ $\text{R}$, and s = σ + ti is a complex number. The author proves that: (1) D_F(s, ?, α) has analytic continuation into the whole s-plane, (2) D_F(s, ?, α), ? ≠ 0, is a meromorphic function with at most a simple pole at $\text{s =}\text{n}\text{δ}$. The residue at $\text{s =}\text{n}\text{δ}$ is given explicitly. (3) ? = 0, α ? $\text{Z}$ⁿ, D_F(s, 0, α) is analytic for $\text{α>,}\text{n}\text{(δ ? 1)}$.     

The Riemann problem for a class of hyperbolic conservation laws exhibiting a parabolic degeneracy

Let M be the n-dimensional Minkowski space, n ? 3. One consequence of [1] is that the null space of the equation $\text{{(n ? 2k + 2)d}{}^1\text{d + (n ? 2k ? 2)dd}{}^1\text{} Φ = 0}$ on differential k-forms Φ in M is conformally covariant. The same is true of a nonlinear equation obtained by adding to the above a term homogeneous of degree $\text{(n + 2)}\text{(n ? 2)}$. This generalizes the well-known conformal covariance properties of the wave equation and the equations $\text{φ ± φ}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>(n\; +\; 2)</mtext><mtext>(n\; ?\; 2)</mtext>}}\text{= 0}$ when k = 0, and of Maxwell's equations on a vector potential when $\text{k =}\text{(n ± 2)}\text{2}$ (and n is even). We define a natural (conformally invariant) symplectic structure for the new equations, and use it to calculate the $\text{(n + 1)(n + 2)}\text{2}$ conserved quantities corresponding to the standard conformal group generators.     

Some aspects of the finite moment problem

The approximate solution of the finite moment problem $\text{μ}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{= ∫}{}_0{}^1\text{x}{}^{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{?(x)}\text{d}\text{x}$, k = 1, 2, 3, …, is considered. This problem is related to the problem of finding a best polynomial least squares approximation to a given function $\text{?(x)}$ in [0,1]. The connection with Laplace transform inversion is emphasized, and a set of special square matrices with integral elements is introduced, which has an intimate relation to the above two problems. These matrices are the well-known inverses of finite segments of the infinite Hilbert matrix.     

A regularity result for singular nonlinear elliptic systems in inverse-power weighted Sobolev spaces

The compactness method to weighted spaces is extended to prove the following theorem:Let H_2,s¹(B₁) be the weighted Sobolev space on the unit ball in Rⁿ with norm

$\text{6ν6}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{2,s}}\text{=}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{(}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)|ν|}{}^2\text{dx + ∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{(}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)|Dν|}{}^2\text{dx.}$

Let n ? 2 ? s < n. Let u? [H_2,s¹(B₁) ∩ L^∞(B₁)]^N be a solution of the nonlinear elliptic system

$\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{i,j=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{h,K=1}\text{N}\text{A}{}^{\mathrm{hK}}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{(x,u) D}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{h}}\text{D}{}^{\mathrm{j\psi }}{}_{\mathrm{K}}\text{dx=0}$

, $\text{∨}\text{ψ}\text{?}\text{¦C}{}_0{}^1\text{(B}{}_1\text{)¦}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{,}\text{where}\text{¦A}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}{}^{\mathrm{hk}}\text{¦ ? L, A}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}{}^{\mathrm{hk}}$ are uniformly continuous functions of their arguments and satisfy:

$\text{|η|}{}^2\text{=}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{j=1}\text{N}\text{|η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{|}{}^2\text{?}\text{∑}\text{i,j=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{h,K=1}\text{N}\text{A}{}^{\mathrm{hK}}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{h}}\text{η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{,}\text{?η?R}{}^{\mathrm{Nn}}$

. Then there exists an R₁, 0 < R₁ < 1, and an α, 0 < α < 1, along with a set $\text{Ω ? B}{}_1$ such that (1) $\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 2}}\text{(Ω) = 0}$, (2) Ω does not contain the origin; Ω does not contain B_R1, (3) $\text{B}{}_1\text{? Ω}$ is open, (4) u is $\text{Lip}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(B}{}_1\text{? Ω)}$; u is Lip_αB_R1.