High-valent nonheme iron. Two distinct iron(IV) species derived from a common iron(II) precursor

The reaction of [Fe(II)(beta-BPMCN)(OTf)2] (1, BPMCN = N,N'-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-N,N'-dimethyl-trans-1,2-diaminocyclohexane) with tBuOOH at low-temperature yields alkylperoxoiron(III) intermediates 2 in CH2Cl2 and 2-NCMe in CH3CN. At -45 degrees C and above, 2-NCMe converts to a pale green species 3 (lambda(max) = 753 nm, epsilon = 280 M(-1) cm(-1)) in 90% yield, identified as [Fe(IV)(O)(BPMCN)(NCCH3)]2+ by comparison to other nonheme [Fe(IV)(O)(L)]2+ complexes. Below -55 degrees C in CH2Cl2, 2 decays instead to form deep turquoise 4 (lambda(max) = 656, 845 nm; epsilon = 4000, 3600 M(-1) cm(-1)), formulated to be an unprecedented alkylperoxoiron(IV) complex [Fe(IV)(BPMCN)(OH)(OOtBu)]2+ on the basis of M?ssbauer, EXAFS, resonance Raman, NMR, and mass spectral evidence. The reactivity of 1 with tBuOOH in the two solvents reveals an unexpectedly rich iron(IV) chemistry that can be supported by the BPMCN ligand.     

electrochemical generation of a nonheme oxoiron(IV) complex

The complex [Fe(IV)O(N4Py)]2+ (N4Py = N,N-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-N-bis(2-pyridyl)methylamine) has been prepared by bulk electrolysis in aqueous CH3CN and CH2Cl2, and its redox properties characterized. Bulk chronocoulometry and spectropotentiometry experiments in CH3CN show that [Fe(II)(N4Py)(NCCH3)]2+ can be oxidized quantitatively to its iron(III) derivative at an applied potential of +0.71 V vs ferrocene and then to the oxoiron(IV) complex (in the presence of added water) at potentials above +1.3 V. The E1/2 value for the Fe(IV/III) couple has been estimated to be +0.90 V from spectropotentiometric titrations in CH3CN and cyclic voltammetric measurements in CH2Cl2.     

Syntheses, structures, and reactivity of low spin iron(III) complexes containing a single carboxamido nitrogen in a [FeN5L] chromophore

A new pentacoordinate ligand based on TPA (tris-(2-pyridylmethyl)amine), namely, N,N-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)amine-N-ethyl-2-pyridine-2-carboxamide (PaPy(3)H), has been synthesized. The iron(III) complexes of this ligand, namely, [Fe(PaPy(3))(CH(3)CN)](ClO(4))(2) (1), [Fe(PaPy(3))(Cl)]ClO(4) (2), [Fe(PaPy(3))(CN)]ClO(4) (3), and [Fe(PaPy(3))(N(3))]ClO(4) (4), have been isolated and complexes 1-3 have been structurally characterized. These complexes are the first examples of monomeric iron(III) complexes with one carboxamido nitrogen in the first coordination sphere. All four complexes are low spin and exhibit rhombic EPR signals around g = 2. The solvent bound species [Fe(PaPy(3))(CH(3)CN)](ClO(4))(2) reacts with H(2)O(2) in acetonitrile at low temperature to afford [Fe(PaPy(3))(OOH)](+) (g = 2.24, 2.14, 1.96). When cyclohexene is allowed to react with 1/H(2)O(2) at room temperature, a significant amount of cyclohexene oxide is produced along with the allylic oxidation products. Analysis of the oxidation products indicates that the allylic oxidation products arise from a radical-driven autoxidation process while the epoxidation is carried out by a distinctly different oxidant. No epoxidation of cyclohexene is observed with 1/TBHP.     

Spectroscopic properties and electronic structure of low-spin Fe(III)-alkylperoxo complexes: homolytic cleavage of the O-O bond

The spectroscopic properties, electronic structure, and reactivity of the low-spin Fe(III)-alkylperoxo model complex [Fe(TPA)(OH(x))(OO(t)Bu)](x+) (1; TPA = tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine, (t)Bu = tert-butyl, x = 1 or 2) are explored. The vibrational spectra of 1 show three peaks that are assigned to the O-O stretch (796 cm(-1)), the Fe-O stretch (696 cm(-)(1)), and a combined O-C-C/C-C-C bending mode (490 cm(-1)) that is mixed with upsilon(FeO). The corresponding force constants have been determined to be 2.92 mdyn/A for the O-O bond which is small and 3.53 mdyn/A for the Fe-O bond which is large. Complex 1 is characterized by a broad absorption band around 600 nm that is assigned to a charge-transfer (CT) transition from the alkylperoxo pi*(upsilon) to a t(2g) d orbital of Fe(III). This metal-ligand pi bond is probed by MCD and resonance Raman spectroscopies which show that the CT state is mixed with a ligand field state (t(2g) --> e(g)) by configuration interaction. This gives rise to two intense transitions under the broad 600 nm envelope with CT character which are manifested by a pseudo-A term in the MCD spectrum and by the shapes of the resonance Raman profiles of the 796, 696, and 490 cm(-1) vibrations. Additional contributions to the Fe-O bond arise from sigma interactions between mainly O-O bonding donor orbitals of the alkylperoxo ligand and an e(g) d orbital of Fe(III), which explains the observed O-O and Fe-O force constants. The observed homolytic cleavage of the O-O bond of 1 is explored with experimentally calibrated density functional (DFT) calculations. The O-O bond homolysis is found to be endothermic by only 15 to 20 kcal/mol due to the fact that the Fe(IV)=O species formed is highly stabilized (for spin states S = 1 and 2) by two strong pi and a strong sigma bond between Fe(IV) and the oxo ligand. This low endothermicity is compensated by the entropy gain upon splitting the O-O bond. In comparison, Cu(II)-alkylperoxo complexes studied before [Chen, P.; Fujisawa, K.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10177] are much less suited for O-O bond homolysis, because the resulting Cu(III)=O species is less stable. This difference in metal-oxo intermediate stability enables the O-O homolysis in the case of iron but directs the copper complex toward alternative reaction channels.     

Biomimetic aryl hydroxylation derived from alkyl hydroperoxide at a nonheme iron center. Evidence for an Fe(IV)=O oxidant

Many nonheme iron-dependent enzymes activate dioxygen to catalyze hydroxylations of arene substrates. Key features of this chemistry have been developed from complexes of a family of tetradentate tripodal ligands obtained by modification of tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine (TPA) with single alpha-arene substituents. These included the following: -C(6)H(5) (i.e., 6-PhTPA), L(1); -o-C(6)H(4)D, o-d(1)-L(1); -C(6)D(5), d(5)-L(1); -m-C(6)H(4)NO(2), L(2); -m-C(6)H(4)CF(3), L(3); -m-C(6)H(4)Cl, L(4); -m-C(6)H(4)CH(3), L(5); -m-C(6)H(4)OCH(3), L(6); -p-C(6)H(4)OCH(3), L(7). Additionally, the corresponding ligand with one alpha-phenyl and two alpha-methyl substituents (6,6-Me(2)-6-PhTPA, L(8)) was also synthesized. Complexes of the formulas [(L(1))Fe(II)(NCCH(3))(2)](ClO(4))(2), [(L(n)())Fe(II)(OTf)(2)] (n = 1-7, OTf = (-)O(3)SCF(3)), and [(L(8))Fe(II)(OTf)(2)](2) were obtained and characterized by (1)H NMR and UV-visible spectroscopies and by X-ray diffraction in the cases of [(L(1))Fe(II)(NCCH(3))(2)](ClO(4))(2), [(L(6))Fe(II)(OTf)(2)], and [(L(8))Fe(II)(OTf)(2)](2). The complexes react with tert-butyl hydroperoxide ((t)()BuOOH) in CH(3)CN solutions to give iron(III) complexes of ortho-hydroxylated ligands. The product complex derived from L(1) was identified as the solvated monomeric complex [(L(1)O(-))Fe(III)](2+) in equilibrium with its oxo-bridged dimer [(L(1)O(-))(2)Fe(III)(2)(mu(2)-O)](2+), which was characterized by X-ray crystallography as the BPh(4)(-) salt. The L(8) product was also an oxo-bridged dimer, [(L(8)O(-))(2)Fe(III)(2)(mu(2)-O)](2+). Transient intermediates were observed at low temperature by UV-visible spectroscopy, and these were characterized as iron(III) alkylperoxo complexes by resonance Raman and EPR spectroscopies for L(1) and L(8). [(L(1))Fe(II)(OTf)(2)] gave rise to a mixture of high-spin (S = 5/2) and low-spin (S = 1/2) Fe(III)-OOR isomers in acetonitrile, whereas both [(L(1))Fe(OTf)(2)] in CH(2)Cl(2) and [(L(8))Fe(OTf)(2)](2) in acetonitrile afforded only high-spin intermediates. The L(1) and L(8) intermediates both decomposed to form respective phenolate complexes, but their reaction times differed by 3 orders of magnitude. In the case of L(1), (18)O isotope labeling indicated that the phenolate oxygen is derived from the terminal peroxide oxygen via a species that can undergo partial exchange with exogenous water. The iron(III) alkylperoxo intermediate is proposed to undergo homolytic O-O bond cleavage to yield an oxoiron(IV) species as an unobserved reactive intermediate in the hydroxylation of the pendant alpha-aryl substituents. The putative homolytic chemistry was confirmed by using 2-methyl-1-phenyl-2-propyl hydroperoxide (MPPH) as a probe, and the products obtained in the presence and in the absence of air were consistent with formation of alkoxy radical (RO(*)). Moreover, when one ortho position was labeled with deuterium, no selectivity was observed between hydroxylation of the deuterated and normal isotopomeric ortho sites, but a significant 1,2-deuterium shift ("NIH shift") occurred. These results provide strong mechanistic evidence for a metal-centered electrophilic oxidant, presumably an oxoiron(IV) complex, in these arene hydroxylations and support participation of such a species in the mechanisms of the nonheme iron- and pterin-dependent aryl amino acid hydroxylases.     

Olefin cis-dihydroxylation versus epoxidation by non-heme iron catalysts: two faces of an Fe(III)-OOH coin

The oxygenation of carbon-carbon double bonds by iron enzymes generally results in the formation of epoxides, except in the case of the Rieske dioxygenases, where cis-diols are produced. Herein we report a systematic study of olefin oxidations with H(2)O(2) catalyzed by a group of non-heme iron complexes, i.e., [Fe(II)(BPMEN)(CH(3)CN)(2)](2+) (1, BPMEN = N,N'-dimethyl-N,N'-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-1,2-diaminoethane) and [Fe(II)(TPA)(CH(3)CN)(2)](2+) (4, TPA = tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine) and their 6- and 5-methyl-substituted derivatives. We demonstrate that olefin epoxidation and cis-dihydroxylation are different facets of the reactivity of a common Fe(III)-OOH intermediate, whose spin state can be modulated by the electronic and steric properties of the ligand environment. Highly stereoselective epoxidation is favored by catalysts with no more than one 6-methyl substituent, which give rise to low-spin Fe(III)-OOH species (category A). On the other hand, cis-dihydroxylation is favored by catalysts with more than one 6-methyl substituent, which afford high-spin Fe(III)-OOH species (category B). For catalysts in category A, both the epoxide and the cis-diol product incorporate (18)O from H(2)(18)O, results that implicate a cis-H(18)O-Fe(V)=O species derived from O-O bond heterolysis of a cis-H(2)(18)O-Fe(III)-OOH intermediate. In contrast, catalysts in category B incorporate both oxygen atoms from H(2)(18)O(2) into the dominant cis-diol product, via a putative Fe(III)-eta(2)-OOH species. Thus, a key feature of the catalysts in this family is the availability of two cis labile sites, required for peroxide activation. The olefin epoxidation and cis-dihydroxylation studies described here not only corroborate the mechanistic scheme derived from our earlier studies on alkane hydroxylation by this same family of catalysts (Chen, K.; Que, L, Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6327) but also further enhance its credibility. Taken together, these reactions demonstrate the catalytic versatility of these complexes and provide a rationale for Nature's choice of ligand environments in biocatalysts that carry out olefin oxidations.     

Electronic structure of high-spin iron(III)-alkylperoxo complexes and its relation to low-spin analogues: reaction coordinate of O-O bond homolysis.

The spectroscopic properties of the high-spin Fe(III)-alkylperoxo model complex [Fe(6-Me(3)TPA)(OH(x))(OO(t)Bu)](x)(+) (1; TPA = tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine, (t)Bu = tert-butyl, x = 1 or 2) are defined and related to density functional calculations of corresponding models in order to determine the electronic structure and reactivity of this system. The Raman spectra of 1 show four peaks at 876, 842, 637, and 469 cm(-1) that are assigned with the help of normal coordinate analysis, and corresponding force constants have been determined to be 3.55 mdyn/A for the O-O and 2.87 mdyn/A for the Fe-O bond. Complex 1 has a broad absorption feature around 560 nm that is assigned to a charge-transfer (CT) transition from the alkylperoxo to a t(2g) d orbital of Fe(III) with the help of resonance Raman profiles and MCD spectroscopy. An additional contribution to the Fe-O bond arises from a sigma interaction between and an e(g) d orbital of iron. The electronic structure of 1 is compared to the related low-spin model complex [Fe(TPA)(OH(x))(OO(t)Bu)](x)(+) and the reaction coordinate for O-O homolysis is explored for both the low-spin and the high-spin Fe(III)-alkylperoxo systems. Importantly, there is a barrier for homolytic cleavage of the O-O bond on the high-spin potential energy surface that is not present for the low-spin complex, which is therefore nicely set up for O-O homolysis. This is reflected by the electronic structure of the low-spin complex having a strong Fe-O and a weak O-O bond due to a strong Fe-O sigma interaction. In addition, the reaction coordinate of the Fe-O homolysis has been investigated, which is a possible decay pathway for the high-spin system, but which is thermodynamically unfavorable for the low-spin complex.     

Photochemical activation of ruthenium(II)-pyridylamine complexes having a pyridine-N-oxide pendant toward oxygenation of organic substrates

Ruthenium(II)-acetonitrile complexes having η(3)-tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine (TPA) with an uncoordinated pyridine ring and diimine such as 2,2'-bipyridine (bpy) and 2,2'-bipyrimidine (bpm), [Ru(II)(η(3)-TPA)(diimine)(CH(3)CN)](2+), reacted with m-chloroperbenzoic acid to afford corresponding Ru(II)-acetonitrile complexes having an uncoordinated pyridine-N-oxide arm, [Ru(II)(η(3)-TPA-O)(diimine)(CH(3)CN)](2+), with retention of the coordination environment. Photoirradiation of the acetonitrile complexes having diimine and the η(3)-TPA with the uncoordinated pyridine-N-oxide arm afforded a mixture of [Ru(II)(TPA)(diimine)](2+), intermediate-spin (S = 1) Ru(IV)-oxo complex with uncoordinated pyridine arm, and intermediate-spin Ru(IV)-oxo complex with uncoordinated pyridine-N-oxide arm. A Ru(II) complex bearing an oxygen-bound pyridine-N-oxide as a ligand and bpm as a diimine ligand was also obtained, and its crystal structure was determined by X-ray crystallography. Femtosecond laser flash photolysis of the isolated O-coordinated Ru(II)-pyridine-N-oxide complex has been investigated to reveal the photodynamics. The Ru(IV)-oxo complex with an uncoordinated pyridine moiety was alternatively prepared by reaction of the corresponding acetonitrile complex with 2,6-dichloropyridine-N-oxide (Cl(2)py-O) to identify the Ru(IV)-oxo species. The formation of Ru(IV)-oxo complexes was concluded to proceed via intermolecular oxygen atom transfer from the uncoordinated pyridine-N-oxide to a Ru(II) center on the basis of the results of the reaction with Cl(2)py-O and the concentration dependence of the consumption of the starting Ru(II) complexes having the uncoordinated pyridine-N-oxide moiety. Oxygenation reactions of organic substrates by [Ru(II)(η(3)-TPA-O)(diimine)(CH(3)CN)](2+) were examined under irradiation (at 420 ± 5 nm) and showed selective allylic oxygenation of cyclohexene to give cyclohexen-1-ol and cyclohexen-1-one and cumene oxygenation to afford cumyl alcohol and acetophenone.     

Trigonal bipyramidal geometry and tridentate coordination mode of the tripod in FeCl(2) complexes with tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine derivatives bis-alpha-substituted with bulky groups. structures and spectroscopic comparative studies

A series of dichloroferrous complexes with ligands derived from the tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine tripod has been prepared and characterized. The X-ray crystal structures of the complexes [bis(2-bromo-6-pyridylmethyl)(2-pyridylmethyl)amine]Fe(II)Cl(2) ((Br(2)TPA)Fe(II)Cl(2)) and [bis(2-phenyl-6-pyridylmethyl)(2-pyridylmethyl)amine]Fe(II)Cl(2), ((Ph(2)TPA)Fe(II)Cl(2)) are reported. In these complexes, the tripod coordinates in the tridentate mode, with a substituted pyridyl arm dangling away from the metal. Both complexes have a trigonal bipyramidal iron center with two equatorial chloride ions. Their crystal structures are compared with those of the [tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine]Fe(II)Cl(2) and [(2-bromo-6-pyridylmethyl)bis(2-pyridylmethyl)amine]Fe(II)Cl(2) complexes ((TPA)Fe(II)Cl(2) and (BrTPA)Fe(II)Cl(2), respectively) in which the ligand coordinates in the tetradentate mode. For all complexes, the metal to ligand distances are systematically above the value of 2.0 A, and (1)H NMR displays paramagnetically shifted resonances with short relaxation times. This indicates that the iron is in a high-spin state. Electric conductivity measurements show that, for all complexes, the measured values lie within the same range, significantly below those expected for ionic complexes. Together with the analysis of the UV-visible and NMR data, this strongly suggests that the coordination mode of the tripod is retained in solution.     

Evaluating the identity and diiron core transformations of a (μ-oxo)diiron(III) complex supported by electron-rich tris(pyridyl-2-methyl)amine ligands

The composition of a (μ-oxo)diiron(III) complex coordinated by tris[(3,5-dimethyl-4-methoxy)pyridyl-2-methyl]amine (R(3)TPA) ligands was investigated. Characterization using a variety of spectroscopic methods and X-ray crystallography indicated that the reaction of iron(III) perchlorate, sodium hydroxide, and R(3)TPA affords [Fe(2)(μ-O)(μ-OH)(R(3)TPA)(2)](ClO(4))(3) (2) rather than the previously reported species [Fe(2)(μ-O)(OH)(H(2)O)(R(3)TPA)(2)](ClO(4))(3) (1). Facile conversion of the (μ-oxo)(μ-hydroxo)diiron(III) core of 2 to the (μ-oxo)(hydroxo)(aqua)diiron(III) core of 1 occurs in the presence of water and at low temperature. When 2 is exposed to wet acetonitrile at room temperature, the CH(3)CN adduct is hydrolyzed to CH(3)COO(-), which forms the compound [Fe(2)(μ-O)(μ-CH(3)COO)(R(3)TPA)(2)](ClO(4))(3) (10). The identity of 10 was confirmed by comparison of its spectroscopic properties with those of an independently prepared sample. To evaluate whether or not 1 and 2 are capable of generating the diiron(IV) species [Fe(2)(μ-O)(OH)(O)(R(3)TPA)(2)](3+) (4), which has previously been generated as a synthetic model for high-valent diiron protein oxygenated intermediates, studies were performed to investigate their reactivity with hydrogen peroxide. Because 2 reacts rapidly with hydrogen peroxide in CH(3)CN but not in CH(3)CN/H(2)O, conditions that favor conversion to 1, complex 1 is not a likely precursor to 4. Compound 4 also forms in the reaction of 2 with H(2)O(2) in solvents lacking a nitrile, suggesting that hydrolysis of CH(3)CN is not involved in the H(2)O(2) activation reaction. These findings shed light on the formation of several diiron complexes of electron-rich R(3)TPA ligands and elaborate on conditions required to generate synthetic models of diiron(IV) protein intermediates with this ligand framework.     

A density functional study of O-O bond cleavage for a biomimetic non-heme iron complex demonstrating an Fe(v)-intermediate

Density functional theory using the B3LYP hybrid functional has been employed to investigate the reactivity of Fe(TPA) complexes (TPA = tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine), which are known to catalyze stereospecific hydrocarbon oxidation when H(2)O(2) is used as oxidant. The reaction pathway leading to O-O bond heterolysis in the active catalytic species Fe(III)(TPA)-OOH has been explored, and it is shown that a high-valent iron-oxo intermediate is formed, where an Fe(V) oxidation state is attained, in agreement with previous suggestions based on experiments. In contrast to the analogous intermediate [(Por.)Fe(IV)=O](+1) in P450, the TPA ligand is not oxidized, and the electrons are extracted almost exclusively from the mononuclear iron center. The corresponding homolytic O-O bond cleavage, yielding the two oxidants Fe(IV)=O and the OH. radical, has also been considered, and it is shown that this pathway is inaccessible in the hydrocarbon oxidation reaction with Fe(TPA) and hydrogen peroxide. Investigations have also been performed for the O-O cleavage in the Fe(III)(TPA)-alkylperoxide species. In this case, the barrier for O-O homolysis is found to be slightly lower, leading to loss of stereospecificity and supporting the experimental conclusion that this is the preferred pathway for alkylperoxide oxidants. The difference between hydroperoxide and alkylperoxide as oxidant derives from the higher O-O bond strength for hydrogen peroxide (by 8.0 kcal/mol).     

EPR, 1H and 2H NMR, and reactivity studies of the iron-oxygen intermediates in bioinspired catalyst systems

Complexes [(BPMEN)Fe(II)(CH(3)CN)(2)](ClO(4))(2) (1, BPMEN = N,N'-dimethyl-N,N'-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-1,2-diaminoethane) and [(TPA)Fe(II)(CH(3)CN)(2)](ClO(4))(2) (2, TPA = tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine) are among the best nonheme iron-based catalysts for bioinspired oxidation of hydrocarbons. Using EPR and (1)H and (2)H NMR spectroscopy, the iron-oxygen intermediates formed in the catalyst systems 1,2/H(2)O(2); 1,2/H(2)O(2)/CH(3)COOH; 1,2/CH(3)CO(3)H; 1,2/m-CPBA; 1,2/PhIO; 1,2/(t)BuOOH; and 1,2/(t)BuOOH/CH(3)COOH have been studied (m-CPBA is m-chloroperbenzoic acid). The following intermediates have been observed: [(L)Fe(III)(OOR)(S)](2+), [(L)Fe(IV)═O(S)](2+) (L = BPMEN or TPA, R = H or (t)Bu, S = CH(3)CN or H(2)O), and the iron-oxygen species 1c (L = BPMEN) and 2c (L = TPA). It has been shown that 1c and 2c directly react with cyclohexene to yield cyclohexene oxide, whereas [(L)Fe(IV)═O(S)](2+) react with cyclohexene to yield mainly products of allylic oxidation. [(L)Fe(III)(OOR)(S)](2+) are inert in this reaction. The analysis of EPR and reactivity data shows that only those catalyst systems which display EPR spectra of 1c and 2c are able to selectively epoxidize cyclohexene, thus bearing strong evidence in favor of the key role of 1c and 2c in selective epoxidation. 1c and 2c were tentatively assigned to the oxoiron(V) intermediates.     

Anionic ligand effect on the nature of epoxidizing intermediates in iron porphyrin complex-catalyzed epoxidation reactions

We have studied an anionic ligand effect in iron porphyrin complex-catalyzed competitive epoxidations of cis- and trans-stilbenes by various terminal oxidants and found that the ratios of cis- to trans-stilbene oxide products formed in competitive epoxidations were markedly dependent on the ligating nature of the anionic ligands. The ratios of cis- to trans-stilbene oxides obtained in the reactions of Fe(TPP)X (TPP = meso-tetraphenylporphinato dianion and X(-) = anionic ligand) and iodosylbenzene (PhIO) were 14 and 0.9 when the X(-) of Fe(TPP)X was Cl(-) and CF(3)SO(3)(-), respectively. An anionic ligand effect was also observed in the reactions of an electron-deficient iron(III) porphyrin complex containing a number of different anionic ligands, Fe(TPFPP)X [TPFPP = meso-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphinato dianion and X(-) = anionic ligand], and various terminal oxidants such as PhIO, m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (m-CPBA), tetrabutylammonium oxone (TBAO), and H(2)O(2). While high ratios of cis- to trans-stilbene oxides were obtained in the reactions of iron porphyrin catalysts containing ligating anionic ligands such as Cl(-) and OAc(-), the ratios of cis- to trans-stilbene oxide were low in the reactions of iron porphyrin complexes containing nonligating or weakly ligating anionic ligands such as SbF(6)(-), CF(3)SO(3)(-), and ClO(4)(-). When the anionic ligand was NO(3)(-), the product ratios were found to depend on terminal oxidants and olefin concentrations. We suggest that the dependence of the product ratios on the anionic ligands of iron(III) porphyrin catalysts is due to the involvement of different reactive species in olefin epoxidation reactions. That is, high-valent iron(IV) oxo porphyrin cation radicals are generated as a reactive species in the reactions of iron porphyrin catalysts containing nonligating or weakly ligating anionic ligands such as SbF(6)(-), CF(3)SO(3)(-), and ClO(4)(-), whereas oxidant-iron(III) porphyrin complexes are the reactive intermediates in the reactions of iron porphyrin catalysts containing ligating anionic ligands such as Cl(-) and OAc(-).     

Tuning of spin crossover behaviour in iron(III) complexes involving pentadentate Schiff bases and pseudohalides

Investigations on a series of eight novel mononuclear iron(III) Schiff base complexes with the general formula [Fe(L(5))(L(1))]·S (where H(2)L(5) = pentadentate Schiff-base ligand, L(1) = a pseudohalido ligand, and S is a solvent molecule) are reported. Several different aromatic 2-hydroxyaldehyde derivatives were used in combination with a non-symmetrical triamine 1,6-diamino-4-azahexane to synthesize the H(2)L(5) Schiff base ligands. The consecutive reaction with iron(III) chloride resulted in the preparation of the [Fe(L(5))Cl] precursor complexes which were left to react with a wide range of the L(1) pseudohalido ligands. The low-spin compounds were prepared using the cyanido ligand: [Fe(3m-salpet)(CN)]·CH(3)OH (1a), [Fe(3e-salpet)(CN)]·H(2)O (1b), while the high-spin compounds were obtained by the reaction of the pseudohalido (other than cyanido) ligands with the [Fe(L(5))Cl] complex arising from salicylaldehyde derivatives: [Fe(3Bu5Me-salpet)(NCS)] (2a), [Fe(3m-salpet)(NCO)]·CH(3)OH (2b) and [Fe(3m-salpet)(N(3))] (2c). The compounds exhibiting spin-crossover phenomena were prepared only when L(5) arose from 2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde (H(2)L(5) = H(2)napet): [Fe(napet)(NCS)]·CH(3)CN (3a, T(1/2) = 151 K), [Fe(napet)(NCSe)]·CH(3)CN (3b, T(1/2) = 170 K), [Fe(napet)(NCO)] (3c, T(1/2) = 155 K) and [Fe(napet)(N(3))], which, moreover, exhibits thermal hysteresis (3d, T(1/2)↑ = 122 K, T(1/2)↓ = 117 K). These compounds are the first examples of octahedral iron(III) spin-crossover compounds with the coordinated pseudohalides. We report the structure and magnetic properties of these complexes. The magnetic data of all the compounds were analysed using the spin Hamiltonian formalism including the ZFS term and in the case of spin-crossover, the Ising-like model was also applied.     

Nonheme oxoiron(IV) complexes of tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine with cis-monoanionic ligands

Treatment of [Fe(IV)(O)(TPA)(NCMe)](CF3SO3)2 [TPA, N,N,N-tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine] with 3 equiv of NR4X (X = CF3CO2, Cl, or Br) in MeCN at -40 degrees C affords a series of metastable [Fe(IV)(O)(TPA)(X)]+ complexes. Some characteristic features of the S = 1 oxoiron(IV) unit are quite insensitive to the ligand substitution in the equatorial plane, namely, the Fe-O distances (1.65-1.66 A), the energy ( approximately 7114.5 eV) and intensity [25(2) units] of the 1s-to-3d transition in the X-ray absorption spectra, and the M?ssbauer isomer shifts (0.01-0.06 mm.s(-1)) and quadrupole splittings (0.92-0.95 mm.s(-1)). The coordination of the anionic X ligand, however, is evidenced by red shifts of the characteristic near-IR ligand-field bands (720-800 nm) and spectroscopic observation of the bound anion by (19)F NMR for X = CF3CO2 and by EXAFS analysis for X = Cl (r(Fe-Cl) = 2.29 A) and Br (r(Fe-Br) = 2.43 A). Density functional theory calculations yield M?ssbauer parameters and bond lengths in good agreement with the experimental data and produce excited-state energies that follow the trend observed in the ligand-field bands. Despite mitigating the high effective charge of the iron(IV) center, the substitution of the MeCN ligand with monoanionic ligands X- decreases the thermal stability of [Fe(IV)(O)(TPA)]2+ complexes. These anion-substituted complexes model the cis-X-Fe(IV)=O units proposed in the mechanisms of oxygen-activating nonheme iron enzymes.     

Copper(I) coordination chemistry of (pyridylmethyl)amide ligands

Copper(I) chloro complexes were synthesized with a family of ligands, HL(R) [HL(R) = N-(2-pyridylmethyl)acetamide, R = null; 2-phenyl-N-(2-pyridylmethyl)acetamide, R = Ph; 2,2-dimethyl-N-(2-pyridylmethyl)propionamide, R = Me3; 2,2,2-triphenyl-N-(2-pyridylmethyl)acetamide, R = Ph3)]. Five complexes were synthesized from the respective ligand and cuprous chloride: [Cu(HL)Cl]n (1), [Cu2(HL)4Cl2] (2), [Cu2(HL(Ph))2(CH3CN)2Cl2] (3), [Cu2(HL(Ph)3)2Cl2] (4), and [Cu(HL(Me)3)2Cl] (5). X-ray crystal structures reveal that for all complexes the ligands coordinate to the Cu in a monodentate fashion, and inter- or intramolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions formed between the amide NH group and either amide C=O or chloro groups stabilize these complexes in the solid state and strongly influence the structures formed. Complexes 1-5 display a range of structural motifs, depending on the size of the ligand substituent groups, hydrogen bonding, and the stoichiometry of the starting materials, including a one-dimensional coordination polymer chain (1) and binuclear (2-4) or mononuclear (5) structures.     

Stereospecific alkane hydroxylation by non-heme iron catalysts: mechanistic evidence for an Fe(V)=O active species.

High-valent iron-oxo species have frequently been invoked in the oxidation of hydrocarbons by both heme and non-heme enzymes. Although a formally Fe(V)=O species, that is, [(Por(*))Fe(IV)=O](+), has been widely accepted as the key oxidant in stereospecific alkane hydroxylation by heme systems, it is not established that such a high-valent state can be accessed by a non-heme ligand environment. Herein we report a systematic study on alkane oxidations with H(2)O(2) catalyzed by a group of non-heme iron complexes, that is, [Fe(II)(TPA)(CH(3)CN)(2)](2+) (1, TPA = tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine) and its alpha- and beta-substituted analogues. The reactivity patterns of this family of Fe(II)(TPA) catalysts can be modulated by the electronic and steric properties of the ligand environment, which affects the spin states of a common Fe(III)-OOH intermediate. Such an Fe(III)-peroxo species is high-spin when the TPA ligand has two or three alpha-substituents and is proposed to be directly responsible for the selective C-H bond cleavage of the alkane substrate. The thus-generated alkyl radicals, however, have relatively long lifetimes and are susceptible to radical epimerization and trapping by O(2). On the other hand, 1 and the beta-substituted Fe(II)(TPA) complexes catalyze stereospecific alkane hydroxylation by a mechanism involving both a low-spin Fe(III)-OOH intermediate and an Fe(V)=O species derived from O-O bond heterolysis. We propose that the heterolysis pathway is promoted by two factors: (a) the low-spin iron(III) center which weakens the O-O bond and (b) the binding of an adjacent water ligand that can hydrogen bond to the terminal oxygen of the hydroperoxo group and facilitate the departure of the hydroxide. Evidence for the Fe(V)=O species comes from isotope-labeling studies showing incorporation of (18)O from H(2)(18)O into the alcohol products. (18)O-incorporation occurs by H(2)(18)O binding to the low-spin Fe(III)-OOH intermediate, its conversion to a cis-H(18)O-Fe(V)=O species, and then oxo-hydroxo tautomerization. The relative contributions of the two pathways of this dual-oxidant mechanism are affected by both the electron donating ability of the TPA ligand and the strength of the C-H bond to be broken. These studies thus serve as a synthetic precedent for an Fe(V)=O species in the oxygen activation mechanisms postulated for non-heme iron enzymes such as methane monooxygenase and Rieske dioxygenases.     

Sequential reaction intermediates in aliphatic C-H bond functionalization initiated by a bis(mu-oxo)dinickel(III) complex

The reaction of [Ni2(OH)2(Me2-tpa)2]2+ (1) (Me2-tpa = bis(6-methyl-2-pyridylmethyl)(2-pyridylmethyl)amine) with H2O2 causes oxidation of a methylene group on the Me2-tpa ligand to give an N-dealkylated ligand and oxidation of a methyl group to afford a ligand-based carboxylate and an alkoxide as the final oxidation products. A series of sequential reaction intermediates produced in the oxidation pathways, a bis(mu-oxo)dinickel(III) ([Ni2(O)2(Me2-tpa)2]2+ (2)), a bis(mu-superoxo)dinickel(II) ([Ni2(O2)2(Me2-tpa)2]2+ (3)), a (mu-hydroxo)(mu-alkylperoxo)dinickel(II) ([Ni2(OH)(Me2-tpa)(Me-tpa-CH2OO)]2+ (4)), and a bis(mu-alkylperoxo)dinickel(II) ([Ni2(Me-tpa-CH2OO)2]2+ (5)), was isolated and characterized by various physicochemical measurements including X-ray crystallography, and their oxidation pathways were investigated. Reaction of 1 with H2O2 in methanol at -40 degrees C generates 2, which is extremely reactive with H2O2, producing 3. Complex 2 was isolated only from disproportionation of the superoxo ligands in 3 in the absence of H2O2 at -40 degrees C. Thermal decomposition of 2 under N2 generated an N-dealkylated ligand Me-dpa ((6-methyl-2-pyridylmethyl)(2-pyridylmethyl)amine) and a ligand-coupling dimer (Me-tpa-CH2)2. The formation of (Me-tpa-CH2)2 suggests that a ligand-based radical Me-tpa-CH2* is generated as a reaction intermediate, probably produced by H-atom abstraction by the oxo group. An isotope-labeling experiment revealed that intramolecular coupling occurs for the formation of the coupling dimer. The results indicate that the rebound of oxygen to Me-tpa-CH2* is slower than that observed for various high-valence bis(mu-oxo)dimetal complexes. In contrast, the decomposition of 2 and 3 in the presence of O2 gave carboxylate and alkoxide ligands, respectively (Me-tpa-COO- and Me-tpa-CH2O-), instead of (Me-tpa-CH2)2, indicating that the reaction of Me-tpa-CH2* with O2 is faster than the coupling of Me-tpa-CH2* to generate ligand-based peroxyl radical Me-tpa-CH2OO*. Although there is a possibility that the Me-tpa-CH2OO* species could undergo various reactions, one of the possible reactive intermediates, 4, was isolated from the decomposition of 3 under O2 at -20 degrees C. The alkylperoxo ligands in 4 and 5 can be converted to a ligand-based aldehyde by either homolysis or heterolysis of the O-O bond, and disproportionation of the aldehyde gives a carboxylate and an alkoxide via the Cannizzaro reaction.     

Carboxylate coordination chemistry of a mononuclear Ni(II) center in a hydrophobic or hydrogen bond donor secondary environment: relevance to acireductone dioxygenase

A series of Ni(II) carboxylate complexes, supported by a chelate ligand having either secondary hydrophobic phenyl groups (6-Ph2TPA, N,N-bis((6-phenyl-2-pyridyl)methyl)-N-((2-pyridyl)methyl)amine) or hydrogen bond donors (bnpapa, N,N-bis((6-neopentylamino-2-pyridyl)methyl)-N-((2-pyridyl)methyl)amine), have been prepared and characterized. X-ray crystallographic studies of [(6-Ph2TPA)Ni(O2C(CH2)2SCH3)]ClO4.CH2Cl2 (4.CH2Cl2) and [(6-Ph2TPA)Ni(O2CCH2SCH3)]ClO(4).1.5CH2Cl2 (5.1.5CH2Cl2) revealed that each complex contains a distorted octahedral Ni(II) center and a bidentate carboxylate ligand. A previously described benzoate complex ([(6-Ph2TPA)Ni(O2CPh)]ClO4 (3)) has similar structural characteristics. Recrystallization of dry powdered samples of 3, 4.0.5CH2Cl2, and 5 from wet organic solvents yielded a second series of crystalline Ni(II) carboxylate complexes having a coordinated monodentate carboxylate ligand ([(6-Ph2TPA)Ni(H2O)(O2CPh)]ClO4 (6), [(6-Ph2TPA)Ni(H2O)(O2C(CH2)2SCH3)]ClO4.0.2CH2Cl2 (7.0.2CH2Cl2), [(6-Ph2TPA)Ni(H2O)(O2CCH2SCH3)]ClO4 (8)) which is stabilized by a hydrogen-bonding interaction with a Ni(II)-bound water molecule. In the cationic portions of 7.0.2CH2Cl2 and 8, weak CH/pi interactions are also present between the methylene units of the carboxylate ligands and the phenyl appendages of the 6-Ph2TPA ligands. A formate complex of the formulation [(6-Ph2TPA)Ni(H2O)(O2CH)]ClO4 (9) was isolated and characterized. The mononuclear Ni(II) carboxylate complexes [(bnpapa)Ni(O2CPh)]ClO4 (10), [(bnpapa)Ni(O2C(CH2)2SCH3)]ClO4 (11), [(bnpapa)Ni(O2CCH2SCH3)]ClO4 (12), and [(bnpapa)Ni(O2CH)]ClO4 (13) were isolated and characterized. Two crystalline solvate forms of 10 (10.CH3CN and 10.CH2Cl2) were examined by X-ray crystallography. In both, the distorted octahedral Ni(II) center is ligated by a bidentate benzoate ligand, one Ni(II)-bound oxygen atom of which accepts two hydrogen bonds from the supporting bnpapa chelate ligand. Spectroscopic studies of 10(-13) suggest that all contain a bidentate carboxylate ligand, even after exposure to water. The combined results of this work enable the formulation of a proposed pathway for carboxylate product release from the active site Ni(II) center in acireductone dioxygenase.     

Novel iron(III) complexes of sterically hindered 4N ligands: regioselectivity in biomimetic extradiol cleavage of catechols

The iron(III) complexes of the 4N ligands 1,4-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-1,4-diazepane (L1), 1,4-bis(6-methyl-2-pyridylmethyl)-1,4-diazepane (L2), and 1,4-bis(2-quinolylmethyl)-1,4-diazepane (L3) have been generated in situ in CH 3CN solution, characterized as [Fe(L1)Cl 2] (+) 1, [Fe(L2)Cl 2] (+) 2, and [Fe(L3)Cl 2] (+) 3 by using ESI-MS, absorption and EPR spectral and electrochemical methods and studied as functional models for the extradiol cleaving catechol dioxygenase enzymes. The tetrachlorocatecholate (TCC (2-)) adducts [Fe(L1)(TCC)](ClO 4) 1a, [Fe(L2)(TCC)](ClO 4) 2a, and [Fe(L3)(TCC)](ClO 4) 3a have been isolated and characterized by elemental analysis, absorption spectral and electrochemical methods. The molecular structure of [Fe(L1)(TCC)](ClO 4) 1a has been successfully determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction. The complex 1a possesses a distorted octahedral coordination geometry around iron(III). The two tertiary amine (Fe-N amine, 2.245, 2.145 A) and two pyridyl nitrogen (Fe-N py, 2.104, 2.249 A) atoms of the tetradentate 4N ligand are coordinated to iron(III) in a cis-beta configuration, and the two catecholate oxygen atoms of TCC (2-) occupy the remaining cis positions. The Fe-O cat bond lengths (1.940, 1.967 A) are slightly asymmetric and differ by 0.027 A only. On adding catecholate anion to all the [Fe(L)Cl 2] (+) complexes the linear tetradentate ligand rearranges itself to provide cis-coordination positions for bidentate coordination of the catechol. Upon adding 3,5-di- tert-butylcatechol (H 2DBC) pretreated with 1 equiv of Et 3N to 1- 3, only one catecholate-to-iron(III) LMCT band (648-800 nm) is observed revealing the formation of [Fe(L)(HDBC)] (2+) involving bidentate coordination of the monoanion HDBC (-). On the other hand, when H 2DBC pretreated with 2 equiv of Et 3N or 1 or 2 equiv of piperidine is added to 1- 3, two intense catecholate-to-iron(III) LMCT bands appear suggesting the formation of [Fe(L)(DBC)] (+) with bidentate coordination of DBC (2-). The appearance of the DBSQ/H 2DBC couple for [Fe(L)Cl 2] (+) at positive potentials (-0.079 to 0.165 V) upon treatment with DBC (2-) reveals that chelated DBC (2-) in the former is stabilized toward oxidation more than the uncoordinated H 2DBC. It is remarkable that the [Fe(L)(HDBC)] (2+) complexes elicit fast regioselective extradiol cleavage (34.6-85.5%) in the presence of O 2 unlike the iron(III) complexes of the analogous linear 4N ligands known so far to yield intradiol cleavage products exclusively. Also, the adduct [Fe(L2)(HDBC)] (2+) shows a higher extradiol to intradiol cleavage product selectivity ( E/ I, 181:1) than the other adducts [Fe(L3)(HDBC)] (2+) ( E/ I, 57:1) and [Fe(L1)(HDBC)] (2+) ( E/ I, 9:1). It is proposed that the coordinated pyridyl nitrogen abstracts the proton from chelated HDBC (-) in the substrate-bound complex and then gets displaced to facilitate O 2 attack on the iron(III) center to yield the extradiol cleavage product. In contrast, when the cleavage reaction is performed in the presence of a stronger base like piperidine or 2 equiv of Et 3N a faster intradiol cleavage is favored over extradiol cleavage suggesting the importance of bidentate coordination of DBC (2-) in facilitating intradiol cleavage.