The effects of age and cochlear hearing loss on temporal fine structure sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and speech reception in noise

Temporal fine structure (TFS) sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and speech reception in noise were measured for young normal-hearing (NHY), old normal-hearing (NHO), and hearing-impaired (HI) subjects. Two measures of TFS sensitivity were used: the "TFS-LF test" (interaural phase difference discrimination) and the "TFS2 test" (discrimination of harmonic and frequency-shifted tones). These measures were not significantly correlated with frequency selectivity (after partialing out the effect of audiometric threshold), suggesting that insensitivity to TFS cannot be wholly explained by a broadening of auditory filters. The results of the two tests of TFS sensitivity were significantly but modestly correlated, suggesting that performance of the tests may be partly influenced by different factors. The NHO group performed significantly more poorly than the NHY group for both measures of TFS sensitivity, but not frequency selectivity, suggesting that TFS sensitivity declines with age in the absence of elevated audiometric thresholds or broadened auditory filters. When the effect of mean audiometric threshold was partialed out, speech reception thresholds in modulated noise were correlated with TFS2 scores, but not measures of frequency selectivity or TFS-LF test scores, suggesting that a reduction in sensitivity to TFS can partly account for the speech perception difficulties experienced by hearing-impaired subjects.     

Comparing spatial tuning curves, spectral ripple resolution, and speech perception in cochlear implant users

Spectral ripple discrimination thresholds were measured in 15 cochlear-implant users with broadband (350-5600 Hz) and octave-band noise stimuli. The results were compared with spatial tuning curve (STC) bandwidths previously obtained from the same subjects. Spatial tuning curve bandwidths did not correlate significantly with broadband spectral ripple discrimination thresholds but did correlate significantly with ripple discrimination thresholds when the rippled noise was confined to an octave-wide passband, centered on the STC's probe electrode frequency allocation. Ripple discrimination thresholds were also measured for octave-band stimuli in four contiguous octaves, with center frequencies from 500 Hz to 4000 Hz. Substantial variations in thresholds with center frequency were found in individuals, but no general trends of increasing or decreasing resolution from apex to base were observed in the pooled data. Neither ripple nor STC measures correlated consistently with speech measures in noise and quiet in the sample of subjects in this study. Overall, the results suggest that spectral ripple discrimination measures provide a reasonable measure of spectral resolution that correlates well with more direct, but more time-consuming, measures of spectral resolution, but that such measures do not always provide a clear and robust predictor of performance in speech perception tasks.     

Relations between intelligibility of narrow-band speech and auditory functions, both in the 1-kHz frequency region

Relations between perception of suprathreshold speech and auditory functions were examined in 24 hearing-impaired listeners and 12 normal-hearing listeners. The speech intelligibility index (SII) was used to account for audibility. The auditory functions included detection efficiency, temporal and spectral resolution, temporal and spectral integration, and discrimination of intensity, frequency, rhythm, and spectro-temporal shape. All auditory functions were measured at 1 kHz. Speech intelligibility was assessed with the speech-reception threshold (SRT) in quiet and in noise, and with the speech-reception bandwidth threshold (SRBT), previously developed for investigating speech perception in a limited frequency region around 1 kHz. The results showed that the elevated SRT in quiet could be explained on the basis of audibility. Audibility could only partly account for the elevated SRT values in noise and the deviant SRBT values, suggesting that suprathreshold deficits affected intelligibility in these conditions. SII predictions for the SRBT improved significantly by including the individually measured upward spread of masking in the SII model. Reduced spectral resolution, reduced temporal resolution, and reduced frequency discrimination appeared to be related to speech perception deficits. Loss of peripheral compression appeared to have the smallest effect on the intelligibility of suprathreshold speech.     

Tone detection and synthetic speech discrimination in band-reject noise by hearing-impaired listeners

Frequency resolution was evaluated for two normal-hearing and seven hearing-impaired subjects with moderate, flat sensorineural hearing loss by measuring percent correct detection of a 2000-Hz tone as the width of a notch in band-reject noise increased. The level of the tone was fixed for each subject at a criterion performance level in broadband noise. Discrimination of synthetic speech syllables that differed in spectral content in the 2000-Hz region was evaluated as a function of the notch width in the same band-reject noise. Recognition of natural speech consonant/vowel syllables in quiet was also tested; results were analyzed for percent correct performance and relative information transmitted for voicing and place features. In the hearing-impaired subjects, frequency resolution at 2000 Hz was significantly correlated with the discrimination of synthetic speech information in the 2000-Hz region and was not related to the recognition of natural speech nonsense syllables unless (a) the speech stimuli contained the vowel /i/ rather than /a/, and (b) the score reflected information transmitted for place of articulation rather than percent correct.     

Effects of frequency response characteristics on speech discrimination and perceived intelligibility and pleasantness of speech for hearing-impaired listeners

Frequency response characteristics were selected for 14 hearing-impaired ears, according to six procedures. Three procedures were based on MCL measurements with speech bands of three bandwidths (1/3 octave, 1 octave, and 1 2/3 octaves). The other procedures were based on hearing thresholds, pure-tone MCLs, and pure-tone LDLs. The procedures were evaluated by speech discrimination testing, using nonsense syllables in noise, and by paired comparison judgments of the intelligibility and pleasantness of running speech. Speech discrimination testing showed significant differences between pairs of responses for only seven test ears. Nasals and glides were most affected by frequency response variations. Both intelligibility and pleasantness judgments showed significant differences for all test ears. Intelligibility in noise was less affected by frequency response differences than was intelligibility in quiet or pleasantness in quiet or in noise. For some ears, the ranking of responses depended on whether intelligibility or pleasantness was being judged and on whether the speech was in quiet or in noise. Overall, the three speech band MCL procedures were far superior to the others. Thus the studies strongly support the frequency response selection rationale of amplifying all frequency bands of speech to MCL. They also highlight some of the complications involved in achieving this aim.     

Frequency-to-electrode allocation and speech perception with cochlear implants

The hypothesis was investigated that selectively increasing the discrimination of low-frequency information (below 2600 Hz) by altering the frequency-to-electrode allocation would improve speech perception by cochlear implantees. Two experimental conditions were compared, both utilizing ten electrode positions selected based on maximal discrimination. A fixed frequency range (200-10513 Hz) was allocated either relatively evenly across the ten electrodes, or so that nine of the ten positions were allocated to the frequencies up to 2600 Hz. Two additional conditions utilizing all available electrode positions (15-18 electrodes) were assessed: one with each subject's usual frequency-to-electrode allocation; and the other using the same analysis filters as the other experimental conditions. Seven users of the Nucleus CI22 implant wore processors mapped with each experimental condition for 2-week periods away from the laboratory, followed by assessment of perception of words in quiet and sentences in noise. Performance with both ten-electrode maps was significantly poorer than with both full-electrode maps on at least one measure. Performance with the map allocating nine out of ten electrodes to low frequencies was equivalent to that with the full-electrode maps for vowel perception and sentences in noise, but was worse for consonant perception. Performance with the evenly allocated ten-electrode map was equivalent to that with the full-electrode maps for consonant perception, but worse for vowel perception and sentences in noise. Comparison of the two full-electrode maps showed that subjects could fully adapt to frequency shifts up to ratio changes of 1.3, given 2 weeks' experience. Future research is needed to investigate whether speech perception may be improved by the manipulation of frequency-to-electrode allocation in maps which have a full complement of electrodes in Nucleus implants.     

Spectral and threshold effects on recognition of speech at higher-than-normal levels

To examine spectral and threshold effects for speech and noise at high levels, recognition of nonsense syllables was assessed for low-pass-filtered speech and speech-shaped maskers and high-pass-filtered speech and speech-shaped maskers at three speech levels, with signal-to-noise ratio held constant. Subjects were younger adults with normal hearing and older adults with normal hearing but significantly higher average quiet thresholds. A broadband masker was always present to minimize audibility differences between subject groups and across presentation levels. For subjects with lower thresholds, the declines in recognition of low-frequency syllables in low-frequency maskers were attributed to nonlinear growth of masking which reduced "effective" signal-to-noise ratio at high levels, whereas the decline for subjects with higher thresholds was not fully explained by nonlinear masking growth. For all subjects, masking growth did not entirely account for declines in recognition of high-frequency syllables in high-frequency maskers at high levels. Relative to younger subjects with normal hearing and lower quiet thresholds, older subjects with normal hearing and higher quiet thresholds had poorer consonant recognition in noise, especially for high-frequency speech in high-frequency maskers. Age-related effects on thresholds and task proficiency may be determining factors in the recognition of speech in noise at high levels.     

Recognition of filtered words in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores with and without increases in masking

To examine spectral effects on declines in speech recognition in noise at high levels, word recognition for 18 young adults with normal hearing was assessed for low-pass-filtered speech and speech-shaped maskers or high-pass-filtered speech and speech-shaped maskers at three speech levels (70, 77, and 84 dB SPL) for each of three signal-to-noise ratios (+8, +3, and -2 dB). An additional low-level noise produced equivalent masked thresholds for all subjects. Pure-tone thresholds were measured in quiet and in all maskers. If word recognition was determined entirely by signal-to-noise ratio, and was independent of signal levels and the spectral content of speech and maskers, scores should remain constant with increasing level for both low- and high-frequency speech and maskers. Recognition of low-frequency speech in low-frequency maskers and high-frequency speech in high-frequency maskers decreased significantly with increasing speech level when signal-to-noise ratio was held constant. For low-frequency speech and speech-shaped maskers, the decline was attributed to nonlinear growth of masking which reduced the "effective" signal-to-noise ratio at high levels, similar to previous results for broadband speech and speech-shaped maskers. Masking growth and reduced "effective" signal-to-noise ratio accounted for some but not all the decline in recognition of high-frequency speech in high-frequency maskers.     

Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. II

Twenty-one sensorineurally hearing-impaired adolescents were studied with an extensive battery of tone-perception, phoneme-perception, and speech-perception tests. Tests on loudness perception, frequency selectivity, and temporal resolution at the test frequencies of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz were included. The mean values and the gradient across frequencies were used in further analysis. Phoneme-perception data were gathered by means of similarity judgments and phonemic confusions. Speech-reception thresholds were determined in quiet and in noise for unfiltered speech material, and with additional low-pass and high-pass filtering in noise. The results show that hearing loss for speech is related to both the frequency resolving power and temporal processing by the ear. Phoneme-perception parameters proved to be more related to the filtered-speech thresholds than to the thresholds for unfiltered speech. This finding may indicate that phoneme-perception parameters play only a secondary role, and for that reason their bridging function between tone perception and speech perception is only limited.     

Pure-tone auditory stream segregation and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients

This study examined the ability of cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects to perform auditory stream segregation of pure tones. An adaptive, rhythmic discrimination task was used to assess stream segregation as a function of frequency separation of the tones. The results for normal-hearing subjects were consistent with previously published observations (L.P.A.S van Noorden, Ph.D. dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands 1975), suggesting that auditory stream segregation increases with increasing frequency separation. For cochlear implant users, there appeared to be a range of pure-tone streaming abilities, with some subjects demonstrating streaming comparable to that of normal-hearing individuals, and others possessing much poorer streaming abilities. The variability in pure-tone streaming of cochlear implant users was correlated with speech perception in both steady-state noise and multi-talker babble. Moderate, statistically significant correlations between streaming and both measures of speech perception in noise were observed, with better stream segregation associated with better understanding of speech in noise. These results suggest that auditory stream segregation is a contributing factor in the ability to understand speech in background noise. The inability of some cochlear implant users to perform stream segregation may therefore contribute to their difficulties in noise backgrounds.     

Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region

These experiments examined how high presentation levels influence speech recognition for high- and low-frequency stimuli in noise. Normally hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners were tested. In Experiment 1, high- and low-frequency bandwidths yielding 70%-correct word recognition in quiet were determined at levels associated with broadband speech at 75 dB SPL. In Experiment 2, broadband and band-limited sentences (based on passbands measured in Experiment 1) were presented at this level in speech-shaped noise filtered to the same frequency bandwidths as targets. Noise levels were adjusted to produce approximately 30%-correct word recognition. Frequency bandwidths and signal-to-noise ratios supporting criterion performance in Experiment 2 were tested at 75, 87.5, and 100 dB SPL in Experiment 3. Performance tended to decrease as levels increased. For NH listeners, this "rollover" effect was greater for high-frequency and broadband materials than for low-frequency stimuli. For HI listeners, the 75- to 87.5-dB increase improved signal audibility for high-frequency stimuli and rollover was not observed. However, the 87.5- to 100-dB increase produced qualitatively similar results for both groups: scores decreased most for high-frequency stimuli and least for low-frequency materials. Predictions of speech intelligibility by quantitative methods such as the Speech Intelligibility Index may be improved if rollover effects are modeled as frequency dependent.     

Speech perception ability and psychophysical tuning curves in hearing-impaired listeners

Performance-intensity functions for monosyllabic words were obtained as a function of signal-to-noise ratio for broadband and low-pass filtered noise. Subjects were 11 normal-hearing listeners and 13 hearing-impaired listeners with flat, moderate sensorineural hearing losses and good speech-discrimination ability (at least 86%) in quiet. In the broadband-noise condition, only small differences in speech perception were noted between the two groups. In low-pass noise, however, large differences in performance were observed. These findings were correlated with various aspects of psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) obtained from the same individuals. Results of a multivariate analysis suggest that performance in broadband noise is correlated with filter bandwidth (Q10), while performance in low-pass noise is correlated with changes on the low-frequency side of the PTC.     

Spectro-temporal analysis in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners

Detection thresholds for a 1.0-kHz pure tone were determined in unmodulated noise and in noise modulated by a 15-Hz square wave. Comodulation masking release (CMR) was calculated as the difference in threshold between the modulated and unmodulated conditions. The noise bandwidth varied between 100 and 1000 Hz. Frequency selectivity was also examined using an abbreviated notched-noise masking method. The subjects in the main experiment consisted of 12 normal-hearing and 12 hearing-impaired subjects with hearing loss of cochlear origin. The most discriminating conditions were repeated on 16 additional hearing-impaired subjects. The CMR of the hearing-impaired group was reduced for the 1000-Hz noise bandwidth. The reduced CMR at this bandwidth correlated significantly with reduced frequency selectivity, consistent with the hypothesis that the across-frequency difference cue used in CMR is diminished by poor frequency selectivity. The results indicated that good frequency selectivity is a prerequisite, but not a guarantee, of large CMR.     

Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level.

For 140 male subjects (20 per decade between the ages 20 and 89) and 72 female subjects (20 per decade between 60 and 89, and 12 for the age interval 90-96), the monaural speech-reception threshold (SRT) for sentences was investigated in quiet and at four noise levels (22.2, 37.5, 52.5, and 67.5 dBA noise with long-term average speech spectra). The median SRT as well as the quartiles are given as a function of age. The data are described in terms of a model published earlier [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 533-549 (1978)]. According to this model every hearing loss for speech (SHL) is interpreted as the sum of a loss class A (attenuation), characterized by a reduction of the levels of both speech signal and noise, and a loss class D (distortion), comparable with a decrease in signal-to-noise ratio. Both SHLA+D (hearing loss in quiet) and SHLD (hearing loss at high noise levels) increase progressively above the age of 50 (reaching typical values of 30 and 6 dB, respectively, at age 85). The spread of SHLD as a function of SHLA+D for the individual ears is so large (sigma = 2.7 dB) that subjects with the same hearing loss for speech in quiet may differ considerably in their ability to understand speech in noise. The data confirm that the hearing handicap of many elderly subjects manifests itself primarily in a noisy environment. Acceptable noise levels in rooms used by the aged must be 5 to 10 dB lower than those for normal-hearing subjects.     

Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise

Cochlear implant users receive limited spectral and temporal information. Their speech recognition deteriorates dramatically in noise. The aim of the present study was to determine the relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues to speech recognition in noise. Spectral information was manipulated by varying the number of channels from 2 to 32 in a noise-excited vocoder. Temporal information was manipulated by varying the low-pass cutoff frequency of the envelope extractor from 1 to 512 Hz. Ten normal-hearing, native speakers of English participated in tests of phoneme recognition using vocoder processed consonants and vowels under three conditions (quiet, and +6 and 0 dB signal-to-noise ratios). The number of channels required for vowel-recognition performance to plateau increased from 12 in quiet to 16-24 in the two noise conditions. However, for consonant recognition, no further improvement in performance was evident when the number of channels was > or =12 in any of the three conditions. The contribution of temporal cues for phoneme recognition showed a similar pattern in both quiet and noise conditions. Similar to the quiet conditions, there was a trade-off between temporal and spectral cues for phoneme recognition in noise.     

Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing

Word recognition in sentences with and without context was measured in young and aged subjects with normal but not identical audiograms. Benefit derived from context by older adults has been obscured, in part, by the confounding effect of even mildly elevated thresholds, especially as listening conditions vary in difficulty. This problem was addressed here by precisely controlling signal-to-noise ratio across conditions and by accounting for individual differences in signal-to-noise ratio. Pure-tone thresholds and word recognition were measured in quiet and threshold-shaped maskers that shifted quiet thresholds by 20 and 40 dB. Word recognition was measured at several speech levels in each condition. Threshold was defined as the speech level (or signal-to-noise ratio) corresponding to the 50 rau point on the psychometric function. As expected, thresholds and slopes of psychometric functions were different for sentences with context compared to those for sentences without context. These differences were equivalent for young and aged subjects. Individual differences in word recognition among all subjects, young and aged, were accounted for by individual differences in signal-to-noise ratio. With signal-to-noise ratio held constant, word recognition for all subjects remained constant or decreased only slightly as speech and noise levels increased. These results suggest that, given equivalent speech audibility, older and younger listeners derive equivalent benefit from context.     

Speech signal modification to increase intelligibility in noisy environments

The role of transient speech components on speech intelligibility was investigated. Speech was decomposed into two components--quasi-steady-state (QSS) and transient--using a set of time-varying filters whose center frequencies and bandwidths were controlled to identify the strongest formant components in speech. The relative energy and intelligibility of the QSS and transient components were compared to original speech. Most of the speech energy was in the QSS component, but this component had low intelligibility. The transient component had much lower energy but was almost as intelligible as the original speech, suggesting that the transient component included speech elements important to speech perception. A modified version of speech was produced by amplifying the transient component and recombining it with the original speech. The intelligibility of the modified speech in background noise was compared to that of the original speech, using a psychoacoustic procedure based on the modified rhyme protocol. Word recognition rates for the modified speech were significantly higher at low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), with minimal effect on intelligibility at higher SNRs. These results suggest that amplification of transient information may improve the intelligibility of speech in noise and that this improvement is more effective in severe noise conditions.     

Measures for assessing architectural speech security (privacy) of closed offices and meeting rooms

Objective measures were investigated as predictors of the speech security of closed offices and rooms. A new signal-to-noise type measure is shown to be a superior indicator for security than existing measures such as the Articulation Index, the Speech Intelligibility Index, the ratio of the loudness of speech to that of noise, and the A-weighted level difference of speech and noise. This new measure is a weighted sum of clipped one-third-octave-band signal-to-noise ratios; various weightings and clipping levels are explored. Listening tests had 19 subjects rate the audibility and intelligibility of 500 English sentences, filtered to simulate transmission through various wall constructions, and presented along with background noise. The results of the tests indicate that the new measure is highly correlated with sentence intelligibility scores and also with three security thresholds: the threshold of intelligibility (below which speech is unintelligible), the threshold of cadence (below which the cadence of speech is inaudible), and the threshold of audibility (below which speech is inaudible). The ratio of the loudness of speech to that of noise, and simple A-weighted level differences are both shown to be well correlated with these latter two thresholds (cadence and audibility), but not well correlated with intelligibility.     

Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience

Channel vocoders using either tone or band-limited noise carriers have been used in experiments to simulate cochlear implant processing in normal-hearing listeners. Previous results from these experiments have suggested that the two vocoder types produce speech of nearly equal intelligibility in quiet conditions. The purpose of this study was to further compare the performance of tone and noise-band vocoders in both quiet and noisy listening conditions. In each of four experiments, normal-hearing subjects were better able to identify tone-vocoded sentences and vowel-consonant-vowel syllables than noise-vocoded sentences and syllables, both in quiet and in the presence of either speech-spectrum noise or two-talker babble. An analysis of consonant confusions for listening in both quiet and speech-spectrum noise revealed significantly different error patterns that were related to each vocoder's ability to produce tone or noise output that accurately reflected the consonant's manner of articulation. Subject experience was also shown to influence intelligibility. Simulations using a computational model of modulation detection suggest that the noise vocoder's disadvantage is in part due to the intrinsic temporal fluctuations of its carriers, which can interfere with temporal fluctuations that convey speech recognition cues.     

Formant discrimination in noise for isolated vowels

Formant discrimination for isolated vowels presented in noise was investigated for normal-hearing listeners. Discrimination thresholds for F1 and F2, for the seven American English vowels /i, I, epsilon, ae, [symbol see text], a, u/, were measured under two types of noise, long-term speech-shaped noise (LTSS) and multitalker babble, and also under quiet listening conditions. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) varied from -4 to +4 dB in steps of 2 dB. All three factors, formant frequency, signal-to-noise ratio, and noise type, had significant effects on vowel formant discrimination. Significant interactions among the three factors showed that threshold-frequency functions depended on SNR and noise type. The thresholds at the lowest levels of SNR were highly elevated by a factor of about 3 compared to those in quiet. The masking functions (threshold vs SNR) were well described by a negative exponential over F1 and F2 for both LTSS and babble noise. Speech-shaped noise was a slightly more effective masker than multitalker babble, presumably reflecting small benefits (1.5 dB) due to the temporal variation of the babble.