Rapid gas chromatographic analysis of less abundant compounds in distilled spirits by direct injection with ethanol–water venting and mass spectrometric data deconvolution

The principal trace secondary compounds common to fermentation-derived distilled spirits can be rapidly quantified by directly injecting 5 μL of spirit without sample preparation to a narrow-bore 0.15 mm internal diameter capillary column. The ethanol–water is removed in an initial solvent venting step using a programmed temperature vapourization injector, followed by splitless transfer of the target analytes to the column. The larger injection facilitates trace analysis and ethanol–water removal extends column lifetime. Problems of coelution between analytes or with sample matrix were surmounted by using mass spectral deconvolution software for quantification. All operations in the analysis from injection with solvent venting to data reduction are fully automated for unattended sequential sample analysis. The synergy of the various contributory steps combines to offer an effective novel solution for this analysis. Applications include quantification of low ppm amounts of acids and esters and sub-ppm profiling of trace compounds from both the raw material malt and the ageing in wood barrels.     

Maximum transfer condition for spitless injection

Splitless injection conditions were optimized by the use of experimental designs (2-level factorial and central composite designs). Modified parameters were: Type of liner, injection volume, solvent, temperature, splitless time. A prolonged splitless time, considered to be an important parameter, proved to be statistically insignificant. This leads to the conclusion that analytes can penetrate the dead volume between column entrance and split valve. To prevent any penetration of solvents, a small reversed split flow was introduced. It could be shown that this auxiliary flow allows an almost complete transfer of solvents. To further speed up the transfer process, a liner modification was proposed.     

Practical aspects of splitless injection of semivolatile compounds in fast gas chromatography

Possibilities and practical aspects of implementation of splitless injection of larger volumes for fast GC purposes utilizing narrow-bore column, hydrogen as carrier gas, fast temperature programming under programmed flow conditions and commercial instrumentation were searched. As a model sample semivolatile compounds of a broad range of volatility and polarity (7 n-alkanes and 19 pesticides) were chosen. Peak shapes, peak broadening and peak areas and its repeatability were evaluated under various experimental set-ups (liner/injection technique combinations). Various factors, such as liner design, injection technique, retention gap length, compound volatility and polarity, the solvent used, initial oven temperature influenced compound focusation and/or maximal injection volume. Combination of analytical column (CP-Sil 13 CB 25 m long, 0.15 mm i.d., film thickness 0.4 microm) with normal-bore retention gap (1 m long, 0.32 mm i.d.) allowed maximal injection volume 8 microl for 4 mm i.d. liner used without any peak distortion when solvent recondensation in the retention gap was employed.     

Improving splitless injection with electronic pressure programming

An experimental injection port has been designed for split or splitless sample introduction in capillary gas chromatography; the inlet uses electronic pressure control, in order that the column head pressure may be set from the GC keyboard, and the inlet may be used in the constant flow or constant pressure modes. Alternatively, the column head pressure may be programmed up or down during a GC run in a manner analogous to even temperature programming. Using electronic pressure control, a method was developed which used high column head pressures (high column flow rates) at the time of injection, followed by rapid reduction of the pressure to that required for optimum GC separation. In this way, high flow rates could be used at the time of splitless injection to reduce sample discrimination, while lower flow rates could be used for the separation. Using this method, up to 5 μl of a test sample could be injected in the splitless mode with no discrimination; in another experiment, 2.3 times as much sample was introduced into the column by using electronic pressure programming. Some GC peak broadening was observed in the first experiment.     

Large volume sample introduction using temperature programmable injectors: Implications of liner diameter

Temperature programmable injectors with liner diameters ranging from 1 to 3.5 mm are evaluated and compared for solvent split injection of large volumes in capillary gas chromatography. The liner dimensions determine whether a large sample volume can be introduced rapidly or has to be introduced in a speed controlled manner. The effect of the injection technique used on the recovery of n-alkanes is evaluated. Furthermore the influence of the liner diameter on the occurrence of thermal degradation during splitless transfer to the analytical column is studied. Guidelines are given for the selection of the PTV liner internal diameter best suited for specific applications.     

Application of the “cooled needle” technique to split and splitless sampling onto capillary columns

Cooled needle sampling using syringes was applied to splitless injection and to simulated distillation analyses. Slight changes of the construction of the previous device are also described. The changes concern the temperature profile within the injector and especially the vaporization insert. Even with the low carrier gas flow through the injector during splitless injection, discrimination by component volatility can be avoided. Precision and accuracy of simulated distillation data obtained with split sampling also can be improved by the cooled needle technique.     

大体积进样技术在气相色谱-质谱法测定 二英类化合物中的应用

利用大体积进样技术(large volume injection,LVI),结合气相色谱-质谱方法对二英的测定效果进行了研究。同时与传统分流/不分流进样技术进行了对比。对进样体积为1,5,10,25,50和100 μL的色谱图进行了分析。研究表明使用大体积进样方式,在不影响色谱分离度的同时,大幅度提高了分析灵敏度。通过对土壤样品的检测,证明该方法可以用于环境样品的实际测定。     

A new configuration for coupling purge-and-trap/cryogenic focusing/capillary column gas chromatography with splitless injection mode

A new configuration for coupling a purge-and-trap unit to a capillary column gas chromatograph via a cryogenic focusing interface has been developed. In this configuration, the precolumn of the cryogenic focusing interface was inserted through the septum of a split/splitless injection port where it served as both sample transfer and carrier gas supply lines. The injection port of the gas chromatograph was modified by plugging the carrier gas and the septum purge lines. This configuration allowed for the desorption of analytes at high flow rates while maintaining low, analytical-column flow rates which are necessary for optimum capillary column operation. The capillary column flow rate is still controlled by the column backpressure regulator. Chromatograms of purgeable aromatics exhibited improved resolution, especially for early eluting components compared to those obtained by direct liquid injection using the normal splitless injection mode. Quantitative sample transfer to the analytical column afforded excellent linearity and reproducibility of compounds studied.     

Evaluating the impact of GC operating settings on GC-FID performance for total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) determination

Interlaboratory comparisons for the analysis of mineral oil have indicated that many laboratories have problems in producing data of acceptable quality, mainly because of variations in the gas chromatographic settings used in the determination. A D-optimal design was therefore utilized to study the effects of six different GC operating settings on the GC performance criterion proposed by ISO and CEN draft standards ISO/FDIS 16703:2004 and CEN prEN 14039:2004:E for total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) determination. Both qualitative and quantitative factors were investigated. The results indicate that the performance criterion can only be achieved if the splitless injection settings are carefully optimized. Otherwise mass discrimination readily affects the validity of the results. The most critical factors affecting GC performance were the inlet liner design, inlet temperature and injection volume. The methods, however, were robust with respect to small changes in split vent time, GC column flow and FID temperature. The results show that non-discriminating splitless injection can only be obtained by optimizing the injector settings with respect to the significant factors. The main conclusion that can be drawn is that, if no further standardization is to be given for TPH determination by GC-FID, then a proper estimate of the expanded uncertainty should be appended to the TPH results. Only then can the reliability of the TPH results be guaranteed and further justification thus gained to support the end-use of the data.     

Development of a novel high volume band compression injector for the analysis of complex samples like toxaphene pesticide

A new type of injector has been developed for gas chromatographic analysis. The injector has high volume and band compression (HVBC) capabilities useful for the analysis of complex samples. The injector consists essentially of a packed liner operated at room temperature while a narrow heated zone is used to axially scan the liner selectively desorbing the compounds of interest. The scanning speed, distance and temperature of the zone are precisely controlled. The liner is connected to an interface which can vent the solvent or any undesirable compounds, and transfer the analytes to an analytical column for separation and quantification. The injector is designed to be compatible with injection volumes from 1 to more than 250microL. At a low sample volume of 1microL, the injector has competitive performances compared to those of the "on-column" and "split/splitless" injectors for the fatty acid methyl esters and toxaphene compounds tested. For higher volumes, the system produces a linear response according to the injected volume. In this explorative study, the maximum volume injected seems to be limited by the saturation of the chromatographic system instead of being defined by the design of the injector. The HVBC injector can also be used to conduct "in situ" pretreatment of the sample before its transfer to the analytical column. For instance, a toxaphene sample was successively fractionated, using the HVBC injector, in six sub-fractions characterized by simpler chromatograms than the chromatogram of the original mixture. Finally, the ability of the HVBC injector to "freeze" the separation in time allowing the analyst to complete the analysis at a later time is also discussed.     

Splitless injection of up to hundreds of microliters of liquid samples in capillary GC: Part II,experimental results

Sample evaporation in splitless injection of large volumes is rapid: depending on the experiment, results indicate that 200 μl of hexane, for instance, evaporates in 2–10 s, producing vapor at a rate of many hundreds of milliliters per minute. A 60 × 4 mm packed bed of 20–35 mesh Tenax TA enabled injection of 200 μl volumes of all solvents tested, and even 1 ml injections were possible provided they were performed over a period of 30 s. Retention of volatile sample components depends on the sample solvent, the injection volume, and the injection speed, but only little on the injector temperature. Losses of n-tridecane varied from hardly 15 % (when dissolved in pentane) to ca 60 % (ethyl acetate); losses of n-heptadecane were usually below 20 %. The column temperature during injection should be at least ca 20–30°C above the standard solvent boiling point.     

Mass spectrometric detection in narrow-bore (0.10 mm i.d.) capillary chromatography fast, sensitive and selective analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls

The combination of narrow-bore capillary gas chromatography with bench-top quadrupole mass spectrometric detection was evaluated for the determination of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The qualitative and quantitative performances of the system are illustrated by several analyses (PCB standards and human milk extracts). Capillary columns with different internal diameters (0.10, 0.18 and 0.22 mm, respectively) were compared for their ability to separate PCB congeners and the analysis time. Short run times (less than 7 min) were sufficient for complete separation of PCB congeners on a 0.10-mm internal diameter (I.D.) capillary column without any loss of resolution when compared with a 0.22 mm I.D. column. Good qualitative and quantitative data acquisition was possible with quadrupole mass spectrometer for run times of 8 min, but incomplete peak reading was observed when run times were reduced to 3-4 min. Selected ion monitoring and dwell times of 10 ms are necessary to obtain detection limits for individual PCB congeners as low as 0.4 pg microl(-1) for standard solutions and 0.2 ng g(-1) fat for milk extracts. By using cold splitless injection, relatively high volumes (1 microl) for narrow-bore capillaries could be injected without any peak distortion.     

Introduction of large sample volumes in capillary supercritical fluid chromatography

A splitless injection method using make-up flow was developed for SFC. Dilution of sample solvent with carbon dioxide mobile phase was very effective for focusing the solutes onto the column. Injection of a 4.5-μl sample volume on a 100-μm i.d. capillary column became possible.     

Concurrent solvent recondensation large sample volume splitless injection

Concurrent Solvent Recondensation Large Sample Volume (CRS‐LV) splitless injection overcomes the limitation of the maximum sample volume to 1–2 μL valid for classical splitless injection. It is based on control of the evaporation rate in the vaporizing chamber, utilization of a strong pressure increase in the injector resulting from solvent evaporation, and greatly accelerated transfer of the sample vapors from the injector into the inlet of an uncoated precolumn by recondensation of the solvent. The sample vapors are transferred into the column as rapidly as they are formed in the injector (concurrent transfer). 20–50 μL of liquid sample is injected with liquid band formation. The sample liquid is received by a small packing of deactivated glass wool positioned slightly above the column entrance at the bottom of the vaporizing chamber. Solvent evaporation strongly increases the pressure in the injector (auto pressure surge), provided the septum purge outlet is closed and the accessible volumes around the vaporizing chamber are small, driving the first vapors into the precolumn. Transfer continues to be fast because of recondensation of the solvent, obtained by keeping the oven temperature below the pressure‐corrected solvent boiling point. The uncoated precolumn must have sufficient capacity to retain most of the sample as a liquid. The experimental data show virtually complete absence of discrimination of volatile or high boiling components as well as high reproducibility.     

Trace analysis of pesticide residues in water by high-speed narrow-bore capillary gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with programmable temperature vaporizer

A method for the rapid trace analysis of 17 residual pesticides in water by narrow-bore capillary (I.D. 100 microm) gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using a programmable temperature vaporizer (PTV) was discussed. The method consisted of a large-volume injection (40 microl) by a PTV, high-speed analysis using a narrow-bore capillary column and MS detection. The PTV with solvent vent mode was very useful for large-volume injection into a narrow-bore capillary column because the injected solvent volume could be reduced to less than 2 microl. The analysis time was 8.5 min [less than 50% of the analysis time using conventional columns (I.D. 250 microm)]. A 10-ml volume of river water was extracted by dichloromethane (4 ml), and then the extract was condensed to 1 ml. This extract was analyzed. Mean recoveries for river water spiked at 100 pg/ml ranged from 83.4 to 96.7%. The limit of detections of the 17 pesticides ranged from 1 to 100 pg/ml.     

Direct injection of large sample volumes into capillary columns with packed column injector

A direct injection method for large volume samples which avoids severe tailing of the solvent peak has been developed using a packed column injector (up to 100 μl) leading into an ordinary capillary column (0.3 mm i.d.). Modifications are made to the cooler zones of the inlet port and on the carrier gas flow control system. This injection technique is based on the effective use of phase soaking and cold trapping using a retention gap. The large volume of solvent vapor is rapidly purged out of the injector with a higher flow of carrier gas while the solutes trapped at the head of the column are subsequently analyzed with another optimum flow rate. The proposed carrier gas flow regulation system is also compared with conventional split/splitless injection methods.     

Splitless injection–development and state of the art. Including a comparison of matrix (“dirt”) effects in conventional and PTV splitless injection

Kurt Grob introduced splitless injection in 1969. He elaborated most of the working guidelines including the techniques required for reconcentrating the broad intial bands, i.e. the solvent effects and cold trapping. He also designed a vaporizing injector suited for splitless injection. Nevertheless, splitless injection is still often carried out using inappropriate conditions, and many of today's vaporizing injectors are not suited for splitless injection. No autosampler is available that introduces the sample at the appropriate position. Conventional splitless injection is compared to PTV splitless injection for the range of samples that cannot be handled by the anyway superior oncolumn injection, i.e. sample with high loads of involatile byproducts. There is a clear preference for PTV splitless injection as matrix effects observed in conventional splitless injection were found to be substantially reduced or even eliminated.     

Quantitation in capillary gas chromatography with emphasis on the problems of sample introduction

Sampling techniques for practical quantitative capillary GC have to meet certain principal requirements. Both the absolute and the relative peak areas (e.g. column loads) must be reproducible with high precision and at high accuracy; discrimination of certain constituents according to their volatility should not take place on sampling. On the basis of systematic studies, the three most reliable sampling techniques used for GC analyses with the aim of achieving precise and accurate quantitative data proved to be the following: On-column, injection, splitless PTV injection, and an optimized version of split sampling called “cooled needle split” injection. The on-column technique can be optimized by using precolumns with wider internal diameters and without stationary phase coatings to overcome the problems of large liquid sampling volumes and for automation. The PTV technique should only be used in the splitless mode because discrimination cannot be suppressed completely with the split mode. All three of the techniques can be operated automatically, either to avoid “human interference”, i.e. to improve precision or for unattended operation to save man-power.     

Splitless injection and the solvent effect

Splitless injection is based on the solvent effect as a mechanism condensing large vapour clouds down to infinitely shortened bands. The effect is controlled by the parameters column temperature, volatility and amount of solvent, and rate of injection. By properly selecting the variables the effect can easily be optimized for any combination of sample and column. It is the purpose of this paper to provide the mechanistic understanding as required for this optimization, as well as some rules for the experimental realization. Potentialities and limitations of splitless injection are discussed, and the role of the solvent effect in on-column injection is emphasized.     

Signal enhancement in supercritical fluid chromatography‐diode‐array detection with multiple injection

To circumvent the detrimental effects of large‐volume injection with fixed‐loop injector in modern supercritical fluid chromatography, the feasibility of performing multiple injection was investigated. By accumulating analytes from a certain number of continual small‐volume injections, compounds can be concentrated on the column head, and this leads to signal enhancement compared with a single injection. The signal to noise enhancement of different compounds appeared to be associated with their retention on different stationary phases and with type of sample diluent. The diethylamine column gave the best signal to noise enhancement when acetonitrile was used as sample diluent and the 2‐picolylamine column showed the best overall performance with water as the sample diluent. The advantage of multiple injection over one‐time large‐volume injection was proven with sulfanilamide, with both acetonitrile and water as sample diluents. The multiple injection approach exhibited comparable within‐ and between‐day precision of retention time and peak area with those of single injections. The potential of the multiple injection approach was demonstrated in the analysis of sulfanilamide‐spiked honey extract and diclofenac‐spiked ground water sample. The limitations of this approach were also discussed.