Sodium adsorption on aluminum (100) and (111) surfaces: ELEED,Auger, and contact potential measurements

The adsorption of Na on sputter-cleaned Al(100) and Al(111) single-crystal surfaces has been investigated under ultrahigh vacuum conditions. Sodium was deposited with an apertured ion source permitting quantitative dosage determination. Low energy electron diffraction patterns show well-ordered coherent structures corresponding to $\text{1}\text{2}$ monolayer on both surfaces, and $\text{1}\text{3}$ monolayer on Al(111). A hexagonal pattern corresponding to $\text{7}\text{8}$ monolayer occurs at a nonconforming dosage on Al(100), indicating a reduction in effective sticking coefficient. This result is verified by Auger intensity measurements, which show saturation beginning at $\text{1}\text{2}$ monolayer on both surfaces. Changes in contact potential with exposure were inferred from shifts in the low-energy cutoff of secondary electrons. The initial dipole moment is in good agreement with that on transition metal substrates, while the saturation value of the contact potential corresponds closely to the difference between reported work functions for bulk Al and bulk Na. A true minimum in the work function was not observed. Present results are compared with results obtained from transition metal substrates. Essential differences are attributed to the more metallic character of the bonding in the Al:Na system.     

The absorption of Ag on Ge(100)-(2 × 1)

The initial stages of interface formation for Ag deposited onto Ge(100)-(2 × 1) were studied with high-energy electron diffraction and high- resolution photoemission. The surface core-level energies for clean Ge(100)-(2 × 1) were not changed with the deposition of about one monolayer of Ag, indicating that there was no chemical reaction or atomic intermixing. The Ag nucleated at a coverage of about $\text{1}\text{3}$ monolayer and showed three-dimensional growth for higher coverages.     

On the interaction of cesium with cleaved GaAs(110) and Ge(111) surfaces: Work function measurements and adsorption site model

The work function of UHV cleaved p-Ge(111) and n-GaAs(110) surfaces has been measured in dependence of the Cs coverage. At very low coverages θ < 0.001 the decrease of the contact potential difference is extremely steep. For GaAs the initial slope of the CPD versus coverage curve amounts to ?740 eV for Ge to ?130 eV per monolayer. Up to the saturation coverage the curves exhibit straight line segments with breaks at distinct coverages. Breaks are found for GaAs at approximately $\text{1}\text{12}$, $\text{1}\text{6}$, and $\text{1}\text{3}$ of a monolayer, for Ge at about $\text{1}\text{12}$, $\text{1}\text{4}$, $\text{1}\text{2}$, and $\text{3}\text{4}$. A new model is developed to explain this behaviour. It is based on the assumption of specific adsorption sites for the Cs atoms at the surfaces. With this model the experimental results, including the breaks, may be described in the whole coverage range from θ = 0.03 up to the saturation. Furthermore the dipole moments derived from the straight line segments are in excellent agreement with those values calculated for different surface molecules between the adsorbed cesium and substrate atoms at the specific adsorption sites.     

Structure and electronic properties of cleaved Si(111) upon Ge adsorption

The effect of ultrahigh vacuum deposition of Ge below and at monolayer coverage onto clean cleaved Si(111) surface held at room temperature is studied by low energy electron diffraction, Auger electron specroscopy and photoemission yield spectroscopy. A well ordered $\text{3}\text{×}\text{3}$ R 30° structure developes at $\text{1}\text{3}$ ML, where it replaces the 2 × 1 initial pattern; it persists at $\text{2}\text{3}$ ML before transforming into a 1 × 1 diagram which fades into increasing background at 1 ML and up. Si surface dangling bonds are replaced at $\text{1}\text{3}$ ML by states associated with Ge-Si bonds and Ge dangling bonds to which states due to Ge-Ge bonds added upon increasing coverage.     

Interaction of inert gases with a nickel (100) surface: I. Adsorption of xenon

The adsorption of Xe on a Ni(100) surface has been studied in UHV between 30 and 100 K using LEED, thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS), work function (Δφ) measurements, and UV photoemission (UPS). At and below 80 K, Xe adsorbs readily with high initial sticking probability and via precursor state adsorption kinetics to form a partially ordered phase. This phase has a binding energy of ~5.2 kcal/mole as determined by isosteric heat measurements. The heat of adsorption is fairly constant up to medium coverages and then drops continuously as the coverage increases, indicating repulsive mutual interactions. The thermal desorption is first order with a preexponential factor of about 10¹² s^?1, indicative of completely mobile adsorption. Adsorbed Xe lowers the work function of the Ni surface by 376 mV at monolayer coverage. (This coverage is determined from LEED to be 5.65 × 10¹⁴ Xe molecules/cm^-2.) For not too high coverages, θ, Δφ(θ) can be described by the Topping model, with the initial dipole moment μ₀ = 0.29 D and the polarizability α being 3.5 × 10^?24 cm³. In photoemission, the $\text{Xe 5p}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>3</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ and $\text{5p}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ orbitals show up as intense peaks at 5.56 and 6.83 eV below E_f which do not shift their position as the coverage varies. Multilayer adsorption (i.e. the filling of the second and third layers) can be seen by TDS. The binding energies of these α states can be estimated to range between 4.5 and 3.5 kcal/mole. The results are compared and contrasted with previous findings of Xe adsorption on other transition metal surfaces and are discussed with respect to the nature of the inert-gas-metal adsorptive bond.     

The sorption of CO and O on Ni (111) studied by leed and iss

The adsorption of CO and O on Ni (111) was studied by low-energy ion scattering (ISS) and low-energy electron diffraction (LEED). For the ordered (√7/2) × (√7/2) R19.1° CO layer ion scattering gives a coverage greater than $\text{1}\text{2}$ monolayer, and for the (2 × 2) O layer a coverage of $\text{1}\text{4}$ monolayer. The CO is non-dissociatively adsorbed, with the C bound to the Ni. The molecules are oriented parallel to the surface normal. Island formation at lower CO coverages is possible.     

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study of the physical adsorption of xenon and the chemisorption of oxygen on tungsten (111)

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ESCA) has been used to study the physical adsorption of Xe and the chemisorption of oxygen by W (111). An ultrahigh vacuum ESCA spectrometer has been modified such that thermal desorption behavior from the W (111) crystal can be directly compared with ESCA spectra of the adsorbed species. In addition, since the work function of a W (111) crystal covered with one monolayer of Xe is accurately known from previous work, the binding energy of the $\text{Xe}\text{(3}\text{d}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>5</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}$ adsorbate level can be accurately compared to the gaseous $\text{Xe}\text{(3}\text{d}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>5</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}$ level.When Xe is physisorbed to 1 monolayer the $\text{Xe}\text{(3}\text{d}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>5</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}$ level exhibits a binding energy (relative to the vacuum level) which is 2.1 eV below that found for Xe (g). At lower Xe coverages the shift becomes monotonically greater, approaching 2.6 eV at a Xe coverage of 0.05. This 0.5 eV shift downward is accompanied by an increase of only 0.05 eV in adsorption energy as coverage decreases, and may be partially caused by the presence of ~ 10–20 % of extraneous adsorption sites other than W (111) which adsorb Xe with higher adsorption energy. The adsorption energy of Xe may also be increased by coadsorption of oxygen and the $\text{Xe}\text{(3}\text{d}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>5</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}$ binding energy exhibits a corresponding shift downward as adsorbed oxygen coverage is increased to θ_o = 0.5. Electronic relaxation processes affecting the final state are dominant factors in determining the magnitude of the chemical shift upon adsorption, in agreement with the predictions of Shirley. The magnitude of the relaxation effect seems to be very sensitive to small changes in Xe adsorption energy. Similar effects have been seen for chemisorption of CO.The adsorption of O₂ at 120 K by W (111) yields a single broad O(1s) peak whose line-width decreases with increasing coverage. The final spectra at θ_o = 1 monolayer are very similar to those obtained at temperatures of 300 K or above on polycrystalline tungsten.     

The epitaxy of gold on (110) tungsten studied by leed

Growth of gold condensed on the (110) plane of tungsten has been studied using LEED and AES. Three ordered surface structures were observed when condensation takes place at or above 700 K, and no detectable order is seen below this temperature. Structure 1 is developed as the coverage approaches one monolayer and has gold atoms held in the W(110) array with a resultant 2% reduction in gold atom diameter. The second gold layer adopts the Au(111) structure with $\text{Au}\text{[1}\text{2}\text{1]}$ rotated by 2.5° from $\text{W}\text{[1}\text{1}\text{0]}$ and the first gold layer may also be constrained to adopt this structure. Deposition of more gold produces three dimensional crystallites with Au(111)∥W(110) which are double-positioned with their 121 directions parallel to the 121 directions of tungsten. Addition of half a monolayer of oxygen before condensation, completely prevents formation of structures 1 and 2. Instead, at coverages of 3 or more monolayers, three dimensional crystallites develop with Au(111) ∥ W(110) and $\text{Au}\text{[1}\text{2}\text{1] ∥}\text{W}\text{[1}\text{1}\text{0]}$. This behaviour is compared with the reported behaviour of copper and silver on W(110).     

Distinct binding states in adsorption on a homogeneous surface: Te on W(100)

The adsorption of Te on a W(100) surface is studied by thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), low energy electron diffraction (LEED) and work function change (Δ?) measurements. Three distinct binding states are observed in the first monolayer corresponding the coverages from 0 to $\text{1}\text{2}$ monolayers (ML), $\text{1}\text{2}$ to $\text{2}\text{3}$ ML and$\text{2}\text{3}$ to 1 ML. Within each state a coverage dependence of the desorption parameters is found. The three binding states are discussed in terms of heterogeneity induced by lateral interactions and in terms of inherently different adsorption sites.     

A leed-aes study of the structure of sulfur monolayers on the Mo(100) crystal face

The formation of ordered phases of sulfur on the molybdenum (100) crystal face has been studied by Low Energy Electron Diffraction (LEED), Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) and Thermal Desorption Spectroscopies (TDS). Sulfur was deposited from a S₂ molecular flux streaming out of an Ag₂S containing electrochemical cell inside the UHV chamber. The use of a controlled flux of S₂ allowed the careful determination of saturation values for the monolayer, as well as the formation of multilayers of sulfur. This allowed the calibration of Auger intensities in terms of sulfur coverage. Various ordered structures, c(2 × 2), (1 × 2), $\text{2}\text{1}\text{?}\text{1}\text{1}$ and c(2 × 4), were observed by LEED for different values of the S coverage. Real space models for these structures are proposed that satisfy the coverage values observed and place sulfur atoms only on high symmetry four-fold sites on the (100) molybdenum surface.     

Coordination of acetonitrile (CH3CN) to platinum (111): Evidence for an η2(C,N) species

Acetonitrile (CH₃CN) coordination to a Pt(111) surface has been studied with electron energy loss vibrational spectroscopy (EELS), XPS, thermal desorption and work function measurements. We compare data for the surface states with known acetonitrile coordination complexes. For CH₃CN adsorbed on Pt(111) at 100 K, the molecule is rehybridized and adsorbs with the CN bond parallel or slightly inclined to the surface plane in an η²(C, N) configuration. The ν(CN) frequency is 1615 cm^?1 and the C ls and N ls binding energies are 284.6 eV and 397.2 eV respectively. By contrast, weakly adsorbed multilayer acetonitrile exhibits a ν(CN) vibrational frequency of 2270 cm^?1, and C ls and N ls binding energies of 286.9 eV and 400.1 eV respectively. Both the EELS and XPS results are consistent with rehybridization of the CN triple bond to a double bond with both C and N atoms of the CN group attached to the surface. In addition to this majority η²(C, N) monolayer state, evidence is found for a second, more strongly bound minority molecular state in thermal desorption spectra. As a result of the low coverage of this state, EELS was unable to spectroscopically identify it and we tentatively assign it as an η⁴(C, N) species associated with accidental step sites. By contrast to the surface complexes, almost all of the known platinum-nitrile coordination complexes are end-bonded via the N lone-pair orbital. Several cases of side-on bonding are known, however, and we compare the results with the known complex Fe₃(η²-NCCH₃)(CO)₉. The difference in the coordinative properties of a Pt(111) surface versus a single Pt atom must be due to the increased ability of multi-atom arrays to back-donate electrons into the π¹ system of acetonitrile. Previously published EELS and XPS results for monolayer acetonitrile on Ni(111) and polycrystalline films are almost identical to the present results on Pt(111). We believe that the monolayer of $\text{CH}{}_3\text{CN}\text{Ni}\text{(111)}$ is also an η²(C, N) species, not an end-bonded species previously proposed by Friend, Muetterties and Gland.     

Room temperature adsorption and growth of Ga and In on cleaved Si(111)

Low energy electron diffraction (LEED), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and photoemission yield spectroscopy (PYS) measurements have been performed on a set of ultrahigh vacuum cleaved Si(111) surfaces with different bulk dopings as a function of Ga or In coverage θ. The metal layers are obtained by evaporation on the unheated substrate and θ varies from zero to several monolayers (ML). First, the 2×1 reconstruction of the clean substrate is replaced by a $\text{3}\text{×}\text{3}$ R30° structure at $\text{1}\text{3}$ ML, meanwhile the dangling bond peak at 0.6 eV below the valence band edge E_vs is replaced by a peak at 0.1 eV for Ga or 0.3 eV for In, below E_vs. At the same time, the ionization energy decreases by 0.4 eV (Ga) or 0.6 eV (In), while the Fermi level pinning position gets closer to the valence band edge by about 0.1eV. Upon increasing θ, new LEED structures develop and the electronic properties keep on changing slightly before metallic islands start to grow beyond θ ～1 ML.     

Adsorption of CO on clean and oxygen covered Ni(111) surfaces

Adsorption of CO on Ni(111) surfaces was studied by means of LEED, UPS and thermal desorption spectroscopy. On an initially clean surface adsorbed CO forms a √3 × $\text{√3}\text{R30°}$ structure at θ = 0.33 whose unit cell is continuously compressed with increasing coverage leading to a c4 × 2-structure at θ = 0.5. Beyond this coverage a more weakly bound phase characterized by a $\text{√7}\text{2}$ × $\text{√7}\text{2R19°}$ LEED pattern is formed which is interpreted with a hexagonal close-packed arrangement (θ = 0.57) where all CO molecules are either in “bridge” or in single-site positions with a mutual distance of 3.3 Å. If CO is adsorbed on a surface precovered by oxygen (exhibiting an O 2 × 2 structure) a partially disordered coadsorbate 2 × 2 structure with θ_o = θ_co = 0.25 is formed where the CO adsorption energy is lowered by about 4 kcal/mole due to repulsive interactions. In this case the photoemission spectrum exhibits not a simple superposition of the features arising from the single-component adsorbates (i.e. maxima at 5.5 eV below the Fermi level with O_ad, and at 7.8 (5σ + 1π) and 10.6 eV (4σ) with CO_ad, respectively), but the peak derived from the CO 4σ level is shifted by about 0.3 eV towards higher ionization energies.     

A study of the (00) LEED beam intensity at normal incidence from CdS(0001), Cu(001), Cu(111), and Ni(111)

A Faraday cage apparatus is used for the measurement of the (00) LEED beam intensity, I₍₀₀₎, and the total secondary emission coefficient, δ(E_k), for angles of incidence from 0° ± 2° to 8° ± 2°, with an energy resolution of ± 0.037 of the incident beam energy, in the energy range 1 to 200 eV. The data are normalized and expressed as a fraction of the incident beam intensity. The basic principle of operation is the separation of the incident and specularly diffracted beams in a uniform magnetic field. Monolayer, or in-plane, resonances associated with the emergence of nonspecular beams, as well as beam threshold minima, are observed in I₍₀₀₎ at normal incidence from clean CdS(0001), Cu(111), and Ni(111). Some major differences are observed in the I₍₀₀₎ profiles for the clean (111) surfaces of nickel and copper. All secondary Bragg peaks, except the 2$\text{2}\text{3}$ order, have greater intensities for Ni(111) in the energy range 50–150 eV, thus indicating that the atomic scattering cross-section for electrons in this energy range is larger for nickel than for copper. For the (111) surface of nickel, the (11) resonance is missing, but the (10) resonance and all $\text{1}\text{3}$ order secondary Bragg peaks between the second and fifth orders are observed. For Cu(111) both the (10) and (11) resonances are observed, but the $\text{1}\text{3}$, $\text{2}\text{3}$, 1$\text{2}\text{3}$, and 3$\text{1}\text{3}$ order secondary Bragg peaks are missing in this energy range. These data indicate that multiple scattering with evanescent intermediate waves, or “shadowing”, is predominate on the (111) surfaces on nickel and copper for energies above 30 eV, and that below 30 eV multiple scattering with propagating intermediate waves is predominate on Cu(111). Correlation of the (00) beam intensity profiles from clean Ni(111) at 0°, 2°, and 6° with the intensity profiles of the (10). (1&#x0304;0), and (11) non-specular beams is nearly one-to-one from 30 eV to 100 eV, thus supporting the dynamical theories of LEED in which peaks in the (00) beam are expected to occur at nearly the same energies as peaks in the non-specular beams.     

Electron beam induced desorption and dissociation of CO chemisorbed on Ir(111)

Election beam induced perturbations of CO chemisorbed on Ir(111) have been measured using LEED and AES. The total interaction cross-section for electron-stimulated desorption and dissociation is found to be 0.8 to 1.7 × 10^?17 cm² near $\text{1}\text{3}$monolayer coverage at a beam energy of 86 eV. This total cross-section is estimated to be 1 × 10^?17 cm² when defined with respect to the primary flux of a 2.5 keV beam. Electron-stimulated dissociation is found to occur at 1–2% of the rate of stimulated desorption.     

Copper monolayer formation on platinum single crystal surfaces: Optical and electrochemical studies

The formation of a Cu monolayer on Pt(100), (110) and (111) was investigated by optical and electrochemical techniques. The adsorption isotherms as obtained by cyclic current-potential curves clearly show that the monolayer is deposited in various steps at underpotentials. Differential reflectance spectroscopy at normal incidence was used to detect structural changes of the adsorbate as the coverage increases. For Cu on Pt(110) a pronounced anisotropy in $\text{ΔR}\text{R}$was observed as the electric field vector of the linearly polarized light was rotated. From these measurements it was deduced that Cu in the submonolayer range is deposited onto Pt(110) in rows along the [11&#x0304;0] direction of the substrate. No such anisotropy was found for Cu on Pt(100) and Pt(111) and for surface oxide formation on all three low index faces of Pt. The spectral dependence of the normalized reflectance change,$\text{ΔR}\text{R}$, for the Cu monolayer on Pt(hkl) is shown and discussed.     

Superlattices formed by interaction of hydrogen bromide and hydrogen chloride with Pt(111) and Pt(100) studied by LEED,Auger and thermal desorption mass spectroscopy

HBr and HCl react with Pt(111) and Pt(100) surfaces to form adsorbed layers consisting of specific mixtures of halogen atoms and hydrogen halide molecules. Exposure of Pt(111) to HBr yielded a (3×3) LEED pattern beginning at $\text{Θ}{}_{\mathrm{Br}}\text{=}\text{2}\text{9}$ and persisting at the maximum coverage which consisted of $\text{Θ}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>Br</mtext>}}\text{=}\text{1}\text{3}$ plus $\text{Θ}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>HBr</mtext>}}\text{=}\text{1}\text{9}$. The most probable structure at maximum coverage, Pt(111)[c(3 × 3)]-(3 Br + HBr), nas a rhombic unit cell encompassing nine surface Pt atoms, and containing three Br atoms and one HBr molecule. On Pt(100) the structure at maximum coverage appears to be Pt(100)[c(2√2 × √2)]R45°-(Br + HBr), $\text{Θ}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>Br</mtext>}}\text{= Θ}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>HBr</mtext>}}\text{=}\text{1}\text{4}$; the rectangular unit cell involves four Pt atoms, one Br atom and one HBr molecule. Each of these structures consists of an hexagonal array of adsorbed atoms or molecules, excepting slight distortion for best fit with the substrate in the case of Pt(100). Treatment of Pt(100) with HCl produced a diffuse Pt(100)(2 × 2)-(Cl + HCl) structure at the maximum coverage of Θ_Cl = 0.13, Θ_HCl = 0.11. Exposure of Pt(111) to HCl produced a disordered overlayer. Thermal desorption, Auger spectroscopy and mass spectroscopy provided coverage data. Thermal desorption data reveal prominent rate maxima associated with the structural transitions observed by LEED. Br and HBr, Cl and HCl were the predominant thermal desorption products.     

Interpretation of a new feature in photoemission from Cu based alloys with polyvalent solutes

In our recent angle resolved photoemission studies of oriented single crystal surface of $\text{Cu}$Al and $\text{Cu}$Ge solid solutions we had found a new structure lying between 4 and 5 eV below the Fermi energy, which could not be related to either the bulk or the surface states in the random alloy. To understand its nature and origin we report and discuss photoemission measurements from Cu films, submonolayer to a monolayer thick, deposited on the Al(111) and $\text{Cu}\text{Al(111)(}\text{3}\text{×}\text{3}\text{R}\text{30°)}$ alloy surfaces and from Al and Zn alloys containing dilute Cu impurities. Some experiments on the (100) surfaces in the various cases were also carried out. On the basis of these results, we suggest that the aforementioned new photoemission feature is characteristic of Cu clusters and isolated Cu impurities in polyvalent impurity-rich environment. These clusters probably lie at the topmost layer of the $\text{Cu}$Al and $\text{Cu}$Ge alloy surfaces.     

Étude de l'adsorption par ellipsométrie: adsorption du Xe/(0001) graphite

The adsorption isotherms of xenon on the perfectly homogeneous (0001) face of graphite are known with great accuracy through classical volumetric measurements, LEED and Auger diffusion. Ellipsometric measurements have led to the same results. The formation of five successive monolayers and two phase transitions in the first monolayer have been shown. The ellipsometric signal Δ which is related to the formation of one monolayer varies linearly with the layer number, with only a slight discrepancy for n= 4.5. In the first monolayer the ellipsometric signal Δ varies linearly with the coverage ratio θ, 0 < 9 < 1. The detection sensibility corresponds to $\text{1}\text{100th}$ of a monolayer.     

Substrate steps/adsorbed layer interaction; selective effect on the possible epitaxial relationships: Case of the S/Cu ∼ (111) system

The interaction between monoatomic steps on a vicinal ～ (111) copper surface and the adsorbed sulphur monolayer has been investigated by a method involving the existence of two possible structures of the monolayer. The parts of the surface occupied by each structure, which are equal on a perfect (111) crystal plane, and differ on a vicinal surface (selective effect of the steps), have been deduced from LEED intensity measurements. Experiments on a wide range of surfaces have revealed a very strong selective effect of the steps, even for misorientations as small as 4° off the (111) plane. On surfaces with $\text{〈3}\text{2}\text{1}\text{〉}$ steps, only one monolayer structure exists, which appears to fit perfectly the steps. The behaviour of the other surfaces having the same misorientation angle allowed us to devise a model of the step/monolayer interaction, which includes a partial decomposition of a step into the two nearest $\text{〈3}\text{2}\text{1}\text{〉}$ steps (2D “faceting”). A general framework for exploiting experiments of the kind described above, on other adsorption systems, is also outlined.