Antimagic Labelings of Join Graphs

An antimagic labeling of a graph with q edges is a bijection from the set of edges of the graph to the set of positive integers \({\{1, 2,\dots,q\}}\) such that all vertex weights are pairwise distinct, where a vertex weight is the sum of labels of all edges incident with the vertex. The join graph G + H of the graphs G and H is the graph with \({V(G + H) = V(G) \cup V(H)}\) and \({E(G + H) = E(G) \cup E(H) \cup \{uv : u \in V(G) {\rm and} v \in V(H)\}}\). The complete bipartite graph K _m,n is an example of join graphs and we give an antimagic labeling for \({K_{m,n}, n \geq 2m + 1}\). In this paper we also provide constructions of antimagic labelings of some complete multipartite graphs.     

Note on group distance magic complete bipartite graphs

A Γ-distance magic labeling of a graph G = (V, E) with |V| = n is a bijection ? from V to an Abelian group Γ of order n such that the weight $w(x) = \sum\nolimits_{y \in N_G (x)} {\ell (y)}$ of every vertex x ∈ V is equal to the same element µ ∈ Γ, called the magic constant. A graph G is called a group distance magic graph if there exists a Γ-distance magic labeling for every Abelian group Γ of order |V(G)|. In this paper we give necessary and sufficient conditions for complete k-partite graphs of odd order p to be ? _p -distance magic. Moreover we show that if p ≡ 2 (mod 4) and k is even, then there does not exist a group Γ of order p such that there exists a Γ-distance labeling for a k-partite complete graph of order p. We also prove that K _m,n is a group distance magic graph if and only if n + m ? 2 (mod 4).     

Token Graphs

For a graph G and integer k ≥ 1, we define the token graph F _k (G) to be the graph with vertex set all k-subsets of V(G), where two vertices are adjacent in F _k (G) whenever their symmetric difference is a pair of adjacent vertices in G. Thus vertices of F _k (G) correspond to configurations of k indistinguishable tokens placed at distinct vertices of G, where two configurations are adjacent whenever one configuration can be reached from the other by moving one token along an edge from its current position to an unoccupied vertex. This paper introduces token graphs and studies some of their properties including: connectivity, diameter, cliques, chromatic number, Hamiltonian paths, and Cartesian products of token graphs.     

Unicyclic nonintegral sum graphs

A graph G = (V,E) is an integral sum graph if there exists a labeling S(G) ? Z such that V = S(G) and every two distinct vertices u, υ ∈ V are adjacent if and only if u + υ ∈ V. A connected graph G = (V,E) is called unicyclic if |V| = |E|. In this paper two infinite series are constructed of unicyclic graphs that are not integral sum graphs.     

Approximate results for rainbow labelings

A simple graph \(G=(V,\,E)\) is said to be antimagic if there exists a bijection \(f{\text {:}}\,E\rightarrow [1,\,|E|]\) such that the sum of the values of f on edges incident to a vertex takes different values on distinct vertices. The graph G is distance antimagic if there exists a bijection \(f{\text {:}}\,V\rightarrow [1,\, |V|],\) such that \(\forall x,\,y\in V,\)

$$\begin{aligned} \sum _{x_i\in N(x)}f\left( x_i\right) \ne \sum _{x_j\in N(y)}f\left( x_j\right) . \end{aligned}$$

Using the polynomial method of Alon we prove that there are antimagic injections of any graph G with n vertices and m edges in the interval \([1,\,2n+m-4]\) and, for trees with k inner vertices, in the interval \([1,\,m+k].\) In particular, a tree all of whose inner vertices are adjacent to a leaf is antimagic. This gives a partial positive answer to a conjecture by Hartsfield and Ringel. We also show that there are distance antimagic injections of a graph G with order n and maximum degree \(\Delta \) in the interval \([1,\,n+t(n-t)],\) where \( t=\min \{\Delta ,\,\lfloor n/2\rfloor \},\) and, for trees with k leaves, in the interval \([1,\, 3n-4k].\) In particular, all trees with \(n=2k\) vertices and no pairs of leaves sharing their neighbour are distance antimagic, a partial solution to a conjecture of Arumugam.

     

The connected <Emphasis Type="Italic">p</Emphasis>-median problem on block graphs

In this paper, we study a variant of the p-median problem on block graphs G in which the p-median is asked to be connected, and this problem is called the connected p-median problem. We first show that the connected p-median problem is NP-hard on block graphs with multiple edge weights. Then, we propose an O(n)-time algorithm for solving the problem on unit-edge-weighted block graphs, where n is the number of vertices in G.     

Graphs of nonsolvable groups with four degree-vertices

Let G be a finite group. The degree(vertex) graph Γ(G) attached to G is a character degree graph.Its vertices are the degrees of the nonlinear irreducible complex characters of G, and different vertices m, n are adjacent if the greatest common divisor(m, n) 1. In this paper, we classify all graphs with four vertices that occur as Γ(G) for nonsolvable groups G.     

Outer-2-independent domination in graphs

We initiate the study of outer-2-independent domination in graphs. An outer-2-independent dominating set of a graph G is a set D of vertices of G such that every vertex of V(G)?D has a neighbor in D and the maximum vertex degree of the subgraph induced by V(G)?D is at most one. The outer-2-independent domination number of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of an outer-2-independent dominating set of G. We show that if a graph has minimum degree at least two, then its outer-2-independent domination number equals the number of vertices minus the 2-independence number. Then we investigate the outer-2-independent domination in graphs with minimum degree one. We also prove the Vizing-type conjecture for outer-2-independent domination and disprove the Vizing-type conjecture for outer-connected domination.     

On the intersection graph of a finite group

For a finite group G, the intersection graph of G which is denoted by Γ(G) is an undirected graph such that its vertices are all nontrivial proper subgroups of G and two distinct vertices H and K are adjacent when H ∩ K ≠ 1. In this paper we classify all finite groups whose intersection graphs are regular. Also, we find some results on the intersection graphs of simple groups and finally we study the structure of Aut(Γ(G)).     

Strictly Deza line graphs

For a given graph G, its line graph L(G) is defined as the graph with vertex set equal to the edge set of G in which two vertices are adjacent if and only if the corresponding edges of G have exactly one common vertex. A k-regular graph of diameter 2 on υ vertices is called a strictly Deza graph with parameters (υ, k, b, a) if it is not strongly regular and any two vertices have a or b common neighbors. We give a classification of strictly Deza line graphs.     

Neighborhood contraction in graphs

Let G be a graph and v be any vertex of G. Then the neighborhood contracted graphG_v of G, with respect to the vertex v, is the graph with vertex set V ? N(v), where two vertices u,w ∈ V ? N(v) are adjacent in G_v if either w = v and u is adjacent to any vertex of N(v) in G or u,w ? N[v] and u,w are adjacent in G. The properties of the neighborhood contracted graphs are discussed in this paper. The neighborhood contraction in some special class of graphs, the domination in a graph and the neighborhood contracted graphs are discussed in the paper.     

Recognition of characteristically simple group <Emphasis Type="Italic">A</Emphasis><Subscript>5</Subscript> × <Emphasis Type="Italic">A</Emphasis><Subscript>5</Subscript> by character degree graph and order

The character degree graph of a finite group G is the graph whose vertices are the prime divisors of the irreducible character degrees of G and two vertices p and q are joined by an edge if pq divides some irreducible character degree of G. It is proved that some simple groups are uniquely determined by their orders and their character degree graphs. But since the character degree graphs of the characteristically simple groups are complete, there are very narrow class of characteristically simple groups which are characterizable by this method.We prove that the characteristically simple group A₅ × A₅ is uniquely determined by its order and its character degree graph. We note that this is the first example of a non simple group which is determined by order and character degree graph. As a consequence of our result we conclude that A₅ × A₅ is uniquely determined by its complex group algebra.     

Unicyclic graphs with bicyclic inverses

A graph is nonsingular if its adjacency matrix A(G) is nonsingular. The inverse of a nonsingular graph G is a graph whose adjacency matrix is similar to A(G)^?1 via a particular type of similarity. Let H denote the class of connected bipartite graphs with unique perfect matchings. Tifenbach and Kirkland (2009) characterized the unicyclic graphs in H which possess unicyclic inverses. We present a characterization of unicyclic graphs in H which possess bicyclic inverses.     

Note on a conjecture for the sum of signless Laplacian eigenvalues

For a simple graph G on n vertices and an integer k with 1 ? k ? n, denote by \(\mathcal{S}^+_k\) (G) the sum of k largest signless Laplacian eigenvalues of G. It was conjectured that \(\mathcal{S}^+_k(G)\leqslant{e}(G)+(^{k+1}_{\;\;2})\) (G) ? e(G) + (k+1 2), where e(G) is the number of edges of G. This conjecture has been proved to be true for all graphs when k ∈ {1, 2, n ? 1, n}, and for trees, unicyclic graphs, bicyclic graphs and regular graphs (for all k). In this note, this conjecture is proved to be true for all graphs when k = n ? 2, and for some new classes of graphs.     

The Four-in-a-Tree Problem in Triangle-Free Graphs

The three-in-a-tree algorithm of Chudnovsky and Seymour decides in time O(n ⁴) whether three given vertices of a graph belong to an induced tree. Here, we study four-in- a-tree for triangle-free graphs. We give a structural answer to the following question: what does a triangle-free graph look like if no induced tree covers four given vertices? Our main result says that any such graph must have the “same structure”, in a sense to be defined precisely, as a square or a cube. We provide an O(nm)-time algorithm that given a triangle-free graph G together with four vertices outputs either an induced tree that contains them or a partition of V(G) certifying that no such tree exists. We prove that the problem of deciding whether there exists a tree T covering the four vertices such that at most one vertex of T has degree at least 3 is NP-complete.     

Every graph is (2,3)-choosable

A total weighting of a graph G is a mapping ? that assigns to each element z ∈ V (G)∪E(G) a weight ?(z). A total weighting ? is proper if for any two adjacent vertices u and v, ∑ _e∈E(u) ?(e)+?(u)≠∑ _e∈E(v) ?(e)+?(v). This paper proves that if each edge e is given a set L(e) of 3 permissible weights, and each vertex v is given a set L(v) of 2 permissible weights, then G has a proper total weighting ? with ?(z) ∈ L(z) for each element z ∈ V (G)∪E(G).     

Isomorphisms of Cayley graphs of a free Abelian group

A group G is called a CI-group provided that the existence of some automorphism σ ∈ Aut(G) such that σ(A) = B follows from an isomorphism Cay(G, A) ? = Cay (G, B) between Cayley graphs, where A and B are two systems of generators for G. We prove that every finitely generated abelian group is a CI-group.     

Note: A conjecture on partitions of groups

We conjecture that every infinite group G can be partitioned into countably many cells \(G = \bigcup\limits_{n \in \omega } {A_n }\) such that cov(A _n A _n ^?1 ) = |G| for each n ∈ ω Here cov(A) = min{|X|: X} ? G, G = X A}. We confirm this conjecture for each group of regular cardinality and for some groups (in particular, Abelian) of an arbitrary cardinality.     

Graphs with small diameter determined by their <Emphasis Type="Italic">D</Emphasis>-spectra

Let G be a connected graph with vertex set V(G) = {v₁, v₂,..., v _n }. The distance matrix D(G) = (d _ij )_n×n is the matrix indexed by the vertices of G, where d _ij denotes the distance between the vertices v _i and v _j . Suppose that λ₁(D) ≥ λ₂(D) ≥... ≥ λ _n (D) are the distance spectrum of G. The graph G is said to be determined by its D-spectrum if with respect to the distance matrix D(G), any graph having the same spectrum as G is isomorphic to G. We give the distance characteristic polynomial of some graphs with small diameter, and also prove that these graphs are determined by their D-spectra.     

Graphs with small total rainbow connection number

A total-colored path is total rainbow if its edges and internal vertices have distinct colors. A total-colored graph G is total rainbow connected if any two distinct vertices are connected by some total rainbow path. The total rainbow connection number of G, denoted by trc(G), is the smallest number of colors required to color the edges and vertices of G in order to make G total rainbow connected. In this paper, we investigate graphs with small total rainbow connection number. First, for a connected graph G, we prove that \({\text{trc(G) = 3 if}}\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{n - 1} \\2\end{array}} \right) + 1 \leqslant \left| {{\text{E(G)}}} \right| \leqslant \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}n \\2\end{array}} \right) - 1\), and \({\text{trc(G)}} \leqslant {\text{6 if }}\left| {{\text{E(G)}}} \right| \geqslant \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{n - 2} \\2\end{array}} \right) + 2\). Next, we investigate the total rainbow connection numbers of graphs G with |V(G)| = n, diam(G) ≥ 2, and clique number ω(G) = n ? s for 1 ≤ s ≤ 3. In this paper, we find Theorem 3 of [Discuss. Math. Graph Theory, 2011, 31(2): 313–320] is not completely correct, and we provide a complete result for this theorem.