Das iso-Tetraphosphan P[P(SiMe3)Me]2[P(SiMe3)2]

H ? C Bond Cleavage in Ferrocene by Organylruthenium Complexes Cp*(Me₃P)₂RuCH₂CMe₃ ( 1 ) reacts at 85°C with ferrocene ( 2 ) by cleavage of one H? C bond in 2 to give CpFe[η⁵-C₅H₄Ru(PMe₃)₂Cp*] ( 3 ) (Cp = η⁵-C₅H₅; Cp* = η⁵-C₅Me₅) and neopentane. The ruthenium atom in 3 has a distorted tetrahedral geometry, the planar Cp ligands in the ferrocenyl fragment are eclipsed. Solutions of 3 in [D₆]benzene or [D₈]THF exhibit H? D exchange of the ferrocenyl protons. In the [D₈]THF molecule only the α-deuterium atoms are exchanged. Reaction pathways for this exchange are discussed.     

Kristallstruktur des Zinkamids Zn[N(SiMe3)2]2

Crystal Structure of the Zinc Amide Zn[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ X‐ray quality crystals of Zn[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ (monoclinic, P2₁/c) are obtained by sublimation of the zinc amide Zn[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ at —30 °C in vacuo (300 torr). According to the result of the X‐ray structural analysis, Zn[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ contains an almost linear N‐Zn‐N unit with two short N‐Zn bonds.     

Dihaloheptasilanes X2Si[SiMe(SiMe3)2]2 as potential precursors for silylenes, disilenes and cyclotrisilanes

The synthesis of new dihaloheptasilanes X₂Si[SiMe(SiMe₃)₂]₂ (X=Cl: 2, Br: 3, I: 4) was performed by treating dihydridoheptasilane 1 (X=H) with CCl₄, HCBr₃ or HCI₃. Difluoroheptasilane 6 (X=F) was prepared from either diphenylheptasilane 5 (X=Ph), triflic acid (HOTf), and LiF with concomitant isolation of heptasilanes 7 (X₂=Ph and OTf), 8 (X₂=F and Ph), and 9 (X₂=F and OTf), or by halogen exchange from 2 using ZnF₂. Crystal structures of 2, 3, 4, and 5 are reported. The reduction of 2 with Li, Na or KC₈ resulted in the instantaneous formation of various cyclotrisilanes, while the reduction of 3 gave exclusively the unsymmetrical cyclotrisilane (E)-1-methyl-2,3,3-tris[methylbis(trimethylsilyl)silyl]-1,2-bis(trimethylsilyl)cyclotrisilane 10, which was characterized by X-ray crystallography. A mechanism for the formation of cyclotrisilanes via a silylsilylene-to-disilene rearrangement is proposed. Attempts to prepare the tetradekasilane [(Me₃Si)₂MeSi]₂SiH–SiH[SiMe(SiMe₃)₂]₂ (by reductive dehalogenation of either HClSi[SiMe(SiMe₃)₂]₂ 13 or HISi[SiMe(SiMe₃)₂]₂ 18), or the tetradekasilane [(Me₃Si)₂MeSi]₂SiPh–SiPh[SiMe(SiMe₃)₂]₂ (by reductive dehalogenation of either PhClSi[SiMe(SiMe₃)₂]₂ 14 or PhISi[SiMe(SiMe₃)₂]₂ 19) as precursors for the disilene [(Me₃Si)₂MeSi]₂Si=Si[SiMe(SiMe₃)₂]₂ failed. 14 was characterized by X-ray crystallography. All compounds described were also characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of the two Lithium Hypersilylcuprates LiCu2[Si(SiMe3)3]3 and [Li7(OtBu)6][Cu2{Si(SiMe3)3}3]

The two hypersilylcuprates LiCu₂Hyp₃ ( 2 ) and [Li₇(O^tBu)₆][Cu₂Hyp₃] ( 3 ) (Hyp = Si(SiMe₃)₃) were synthesized by reactions of unsolvated lithium hypersilanide, LiHyp with hypersilylcopper and CuO^tBu, respectively. Both contain the novel A‐frame trihypersilyldicuprate anion [Cu₂Hyp₃]^–. In the former case a molecular compound is produced containing intimate ion pairs. In the latter case the cuprate anion and the unique large [Li₇(O^tBu)₆]⁺ cation form a salt‐like compound, only sparingly soluble in unpolar solvents. According to NBO analyses the bonding within the trihypersilyldicuprate moiety is best described by interaction of a bridging lewis‐basic hypersilanide anion with two lewis‐acidic hypersilyl copper fragments.     

Bildung und struktur der Cyclophosphane P4(CMe3)2[P(CMe3)2]2 und P4(SiMe3)2[P(CMe3)2]2

Formation and Structure of the Cyclophosphanes P₄(CMe₃)₂[P(CMe₃)₂]₂ and P₄(SiMe₃)₂[P(CMe₃)₂]₂ n-Triphosphanes showing a SiMe₃ and a Cl substituent at the atoms P¹ and P², like (Me₃C)₂P? P(SiMe₃)? P(CMe₃)Cl 3 or (Me₃C)₂P? P(Cl)? P(SiMe₃)₂ 4 are stable only at temperatures below ?30°C. Above this temperature these compounds lose Me₃SiCl, thus forming cyclotetraphosphanes, P₄(CMe₃)₂[P(CMe₃)₂]₂ 1 out of 3 , P₄(SiMe₃)₂[P(SiMe₃)₂]₂ 2a (cis) and 2b (trans) out of 4 . The formation of 1 proceeds via (Me₃C)₂P? P?PCMe₃ 5 as intermediate compound, which after addition to cyclopentadiene to give the Diels-Alder-adduct 6 (exo and endo isomers) was isolated. 6 generates 5 , which then forms the dimer compound 1 . Likewise (Me₃C)₂P? P?P-SiMe₃ 8 (as proven by the adduct 7 ) is formed out of 4 , leading to 2a (cis) and 2b (trans). Compound 1 is also formed out of the iso-tetraphosphane P[P(CMe₃)₂]₂[P(CMe₃)Cl] 9 , which loses P(CMe₃)₂Cl when warmed to a temperature of 20°C. 1 crystallizes monoclinically in the space group P2₁/a (no. 14); a = 1762.0(15) pm; b = 1687.2(18) pm; c = 1170.5(9) pm; β = 109.18(5)° and Z = 4 formula units in the elementary cell. The molecule possesses E conformation. The central four-membered ring is puckered (approx. symmetry 4 2m; dihedral angle 47.4°), thus bringing the substituents into a quasi equatorial position and the nonbonding electron pairs into a quasi axial position. The bond lengths in the four-membered ring of 1 (d (P? P) = 222.9 pm) are only slightly longer than the exocyclic bonds (221.8 pm). The endocyclic bond angles \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \bar \beta $\end{document}(P/P/P) are 85.0°, the torsion angles are ±33° and d (P? C) = 189.7 pm.     

茂金属配合物[(eat5-C5H4R)Mo(CO)3 ]2(R: SiMe3 ,Si2Me5)的电子结构研究

运用G98W,采用Lanl2dz基组,对茂金属配合物[(eat5-C5H4R)Mo(CO)3]2 (R: SiMe3, Si2Me5)进行从头算研究,探讨配合物结构单元的稳定性、分子轨道能量、原子净电荷布居规律,以及一些前沿分子轨道的组成特征等,结果表明,标题配合物结构在能量上是稳定的,作为结构单元而存在.     

Double silyl migration converting ORe[N(SiMe(2)CH(2)PCy(2))(2)] to NRe[O(SiMe(2)CH(2)PCy(2))(2)] substructures

The reaction of (R(2)PCH(2)SiMe(2))(2)NM (PNP(R)M; R = Cy; M = Li, Na, MgHal, Ag) with L(2)ReOX(3) [L(2) = (Ph(3)P)(2) or (Ph(3)PO)(Me(2)S); X = Cl, Br] gives (PNP(Cy))ReOX(2) as two isomers, mer,trans and mer,cis. These compounds undergo a double Si migration from N to O at 90 degrees C to form (POP(Cy))ReNX(2) as a mixture of mer,trans and fac,cis isomers. Additional thermolysis effects migration of CH(3) from Si to Re, along with compensating migration of halide from Re to Si. DFT calculations on various structural isomers support the greater thermodynamic stability of the POP/ReN isomer vs PNP/ReO and highlight the influence of the template effect on the reactivities of these species.     

[UIII{N(SiMe2tBu)2}3]: A Structurally Authenticated Trigonal Planar Actinide Complex

We report the synthesis and characterization of the uranium(III) triamide complex [U^III(N**)₃] [ 1 , N**=N(SiMe₂tBu)₂^?]. Surprisingly, complex 1 exhibits a trigonal planar geometry in the solid state, which is unprecedented for three‐coordinate actinide complexes that have exclusively adopted trigonal pyramidal geometries to date. The characterization data for [U^III(N**)₃] were compared with the prototypical trigonal pyramidal uranium(III) triamide complex [U^III(N“)₃] (N”=N(SiMe₃)₂^?), and taken together with theoretical calculations it was concluded that pyramidalization results in net stabilization for [U^III(N“)₃], but this can be overcome with very sterically demanding ligands, such as N**. The planarity of 1 leads to favorable magnetic dynamics, which may be considered in the future design of U^III single‐molecule magnets.     

Monomeres Trilithium-tris[tert-butyldimethylsilylamido]phenylsilan,PhSi[NLi(THF)SiMe2CMe3]3 -- Darstellung und Kristallstruktur

Monomeric Trilithium-tris[tert-butyldimethylsilylamido]phenylsilane, PhSi[NLi(thf)SiMe₂CMe₃]₃ – Synthesis and Crystal Structure Lithiated tert-butyldimethylsilylamine reacts with trifluorophenylsilane in a molar ratio 2:1 or 3:1 to give the bis- and tris(silylamino)silanes 1 [(Me₃CSiMe₂NH)₂SiFPh] and 2 [(Me₃CSiMe₂NH)₃SiPh]. The trilithium derivative 3 [Me₃CSiMe₂NLi(thf)]₃SiPh is obtained in the reaction of 2 with n-BuLi in hexane/thf. 3 crystallizes as a monomer forming three planar four-membered (LiNSiN)-rings. The results of the crystal structure of 3 are discussed.     

[Ge9{Si(SiMe3)3}2{Ge(SiMe3)3}]–: The Mixed Substituted Metalloid Germanium Cluster and the Intermetalloid Cluster [ZnGe18{Si(SiMe3)3}4{Ge(SiMe3)3}2]

The novel metalloid germanium cluster [Ge₉(Hyp)₂Hyp^Ge]^– ( 1 ) was synthesized, exhibiting two different bulky groups [Hyp = Si(SiMe₃)₃; Hyp^Ge = Ge(SiMe₃)₃]. Further reaction of 1 with ZnCl₂ gives the derivative [ZnGe₁₈(Hyp)₄(Hyp^Ge)₂] ( 2 ) in good yield, showing that the substitution of Si(SiMe₃)₃ by Ge(SiMe₃)₃ within a metalloid Ge₉R₃^– compound leads to a comparable reactivity. 1 and 2 are characterized by NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry ( 1 ) and single crystal structure analyses ( 2 ). 1 and 2 are the first metalloid germanium clusters bearing germyl groups.     

Anhydrous solution synthesis of germanium nanocrystals from the germanium(II) precursor Ge[N(SiMe3)2]2

A convenient, simple, single-source solution synthesis of Ge nanocrystals via thermal reduction of Ge(II) precursor Ge[N(SiMe3)2]2 in a non-coordinating solvent at 300 degrees C and 1 atm Ar is described.     

Uranium (III) scorpionates: synthesis and structure of [(TpMe2)2U[N(C6H5)2]] and [(TpMe2)2U[N(SiMe3)2]

Reaction of [(Tp(Me)2)(2)UI] with KNR(2) (R = C(6)H(5), SiMe(3)) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) afforded the monomeric trivalent actinide amide complexes [(Tp(Me)2)(2)U[N(C(6)H(5))(2)]], 1, and [(Tp(Me)2)(2)U[N(SiMe(3))(2)]], 2. The complexes have been fully characterized by spectroscopic methods and their structures were confirmed by X-ray crystallographic studies. In the solid state 1 and 2 exhibit distorted pentagonal bipyramidal geometries. The U-NR(2) bond lengths in both complexes are the same but in complex 2 the greater steric demands of the N(SiMe(3))(2) ligand led to elongated U-N(pz) bonds, especially those opposite the amido ligand.     

Synthesis and structures of the [benzamidinato]3- complexes Li3(tmeda)(L1)]2 and [Li(thf)4][Li5(L2)(OEt2)2] [L1 = N(SiMe3)C(Ph)N(SiMe3) and L2 = N(SiMe3)C(C6H4-4)NPh

Reduction at ambient temperature of each of the lithium benzamidinates [Li(L(1))(tmeda)] or [{Li(L(2))(OEt(2))(2)}(2)] with four equivalents of lithium metal in diethyl ether or thf furnished the brown crystalline [Li(3)(L(1))(tmeda)] (1) or [Li(thf)(4)][Li(5)(L(2))(2)(OEt(2))(2)] (2), respectively. Their structures show that in each the [N(R(1))C(R(3))NR(2)](3-) moiety has the three negative charges largely localised on each of N, N' and R = Aryl); a consequence is that the "aromatic" 2,3- and 5,6-CC bonds of R(3) approximate to being double bonds. Multinuclear NMR spectra in C(6)D(6) and C(7)D(8) show that 1 and 2 exhibit dynamic behaviour. [The following abbreviations are used: L(1) = N(SiMe(3))C(Ph)N(SiMe(3)); L(2) = N(SiMe(3))C(C(6)H(4)Me-4)N(Ph); tmeda = (Me(2)NCH(2)-)(2); thf = tetrahydrofuran.] This reduction is further supported by a DFT analysis.     

Synthesis and P-P cleavage reactions of [P(X)X']2; X-ray structures of [Co[P(X)X'](CO)3] and P4[P(X)X']2[X = N(SiMe3)2, X'= NPri2

Treatment of P(X)(X')Cl with KC8 gave the crystalline diphosphine [P(X)X']2 (1) which dissociated reversibly into the phosphinyl radical *P(X)X' (2), a plausible intermediate in the reaction of with [Cr(CO)6], [Co(NO)(CO)3] or P4, yielding [Cr[P(X)X']2(CO)3] (3), [Co[P(X)X'](CO)3] (4), or 1,4-P4[P(X)X']2 (5); the P(X)X' substituent is pyramidal at P in but planar in [X = N(SiMe3)2, X'= NPri2].     

Einfluß der Ringatome auf die Struktur von Triel‐Pentel‐Heterozyklen – Synthese und Molekülstrukturen von [Me2InAs(SiMe3)2]2 und [Me2InSb(SiMe3)2]3

Influence of the Ring Atoms on the Structure of Triel‐Pentel Heterocycles – Synthesis and X‐Ray Crystal Structures of [Me₂InAs(SiMe₃)₂]₂ and [Me₂InSb(SiMe₃)₂]₃ Triel‐pentel heterocycles [Me₂InE(SiMe₃)₂]_x have been prepared by dehalosilylation reactions from Me₂InCl and E(SiMe₃)₃ (E = As, x = 2; E = Sb, x = 3) and characterised by NMR spectroscopy and by X‐ray crystal structure analyses. In addition the X‐ray crystal structures of [Me₂GaAs(SiMe₃)₂]₂ and [Me₂InP(SiMe₃)₂]₂ are reported. The compounds complete a family of 13 identically substituted heterocycles [Me₂ME(SiMe₃)₂]_x (M = Al, Ga, In; E = N, P, As, Sb, Bi; x = 2, 3), whose structures were investigated depending on the ring atoms M and E. The tendencies that have been observed concerning the ring sizes can be explained by the interplay of the atomic radii of the central atoms and the sterical demand of the ligands. After a formal separation of the M–E bonds in σ bonds and dative bonds the characteristic differences and trends in the endocyclic and exocyclic bond angles of both centres M and E can be interpreted on the basis of a simple Lewis acid/base adduct model.