Effects of the selective disruption of within- and across-channel cues to comodulation masking release

In many experiments on comodulation masking release (CMR), both across- and within-channel cues may be available. This makes it difficult to determine the mechanisms underlying CMR. The present study compared CMR in a flanking-band (FB) paradigm for a situation in which only across-channel cues were likely to be available [FBs placed distally from the on-frequency band (OFB)] and a situation where both across- and within-channel cues might have been available (proximally spaced FBs, for which larger CMRs have previously been observed). The use of across-channel cues was selectively disrupted using a manipulation of auditory grouping factors, following Dau et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 2182-2188(2009)] and the use of within-channel cues was selectively disrupted using a manipulation called "OFB reversal," following Goldman et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 3181-3193 (2011)]. The auditory grouping manipulation eliminated CMR for the distal-FB configuration and reduced CMR for the proximal-FB configuration. This may indicate that across-channel cues are available for proximal FB placement. CMR for the proximal-FB configuration persisted when both manipulations were used together, which suggests that OFB reversal does not entirely eliminate within-channel cues.     

Comodulation masking release: evidence for multiple cues

Signal detection was determined in conditions where the masker was a 10-Hz-wide noise band centered on the signal, and in conditions where either a comodulated or noncomodulated noise band (centered at 0.8 times the signal frequency) was also present. Signal frequencies of 500 or 2000 Hz were investigated. In one condition of the first experiment, the signal was exactly the same 10-Hz-wide noise band as the masker, added to the masker in phase. This condition was designed to limit the availability of cues based upon dip listening, suppression, beating, or across-frequency differences in noise envelope correlation, but to afford a cue based upon across-frequency envelope amplitude difference. The narrow-band noise signal resulted in approximately the same magnitude of comodulated masking release (CMR) as was found for a pure-tone signal. This result suggested that one important cue for CMR is an across-frequency difference in envelope amplitude. Stimulus conditions in the second experiment were intended to disrupt cues of across-frequency envelope amplitude difference, but to afford cues based upon across-frequency differences in noise envelope correlation. In this experiment, cues based upon envelope amplitude were impoverished by randomly varying the level of the flanking band from interval to interval, and by adjusting the level in the on-signal band to be the same in the nonsignal intervals as the level of noise plus signal in the signal interval. Again, substantial CMRs occurred, suggesting that another cue for CMR may be envelope pattern or correlation. The results of these experiments indicated that CMR is probably based upon more than one stimulus variable.     

Comodulation masking release and auditory grouping

The detectability of a pure-tone signal masked by a band of noise centered on the signal can be improved by the addition of flanking noise bands, provided that the temporal envelopes of the flanking bands are correlated with that of the on-signal band. This phenomenon is referred to as comodulation masking release (CMR). The present study examined CMR in conditions in which some flanking noise bands were comodulated with the on-signal band, but other flanking bands (termed "deviant" bands) were not. Past research has indicated that CMR is often substantially reduced when deviant bands are present at spectral locations close to the signal frequency. An investigation was undertaken to determine whether the disruptive effects of such bands could be reduced by factors related to auditory grouping. The signal frequency was 100 Hz. In one condition, only 20-Hz-wide comodulated bands, centered on 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, and 1600 Hz, were present. The CMR for this condition, referenced to threshold for the on-signal band only, was approximately 15 dB. In a second condition, two deviant bands were added at 900 and 1100 Hz; their presence reduced the CMR to only 3-4 dB. The number of deviant bands was then increased progressively, from two to eight bands. Deviant bands either shared a common envelope (codeviant), or had unique envelopes (multideviant). The number of bands that were comodulated with the on-signal band was held constant at six.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comodulation masking release and the masking-level difference

An experiment was performed to determine if the mechanism that mediates comodulation masking release (CMR) is associated with that used to improve detection by the masking-level difference (MLD). The experiment consisted of first improving detectability of a masked diotic tone burst by adding a synchronous noise band at another frequency region (CMR), and then measuring an MLD in the usual manner, by inverting the tone-burst signal to one ear. Results indicate that a substantial MLD can be measured for a signal whose detectability has already been improved by CMR. However, that MLD (9 dB) is smaller than that measured in random noise (14 dB). Put another way, a small CMR (4 dB) can be produced even when the detectability of a stimulus has already been improved due to the MLD. These data are in general agreement with those of Hall et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 1839-1845 (1988)] and Schooneveldt and Moore [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 262-272 (1989)].     

Comodulation masking release using SAM tonal complex maskers: effects of modulation depth and signal position

The purpose of this investigation was to examine two stimulus parameters that were reasoned to be of importance to comodulation masking release (CMR). The first was the degree of fluctuation, or depth of modulation, in the masker bands, and the second was the temporal position of the signal with respect to the modulations of the masker. The investigation began by demonstrating the efficacy of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tonal complex maskers in eliciting CMR. "Nine-band" maskers, 650 ms in duration, were constructed by adding together nine SAM tones spaced at 100-Hz intervals from 300 to 1100 Hz. The rate of modulation for each SAM tone was 10 Hz, and the depth of modulation was 100%. Using such maskers, it was shown that when the on-frequency SAM tone had a modulation depth of 100%, the threshold for a 250-ms, 700-Hz tone improved monotonically as the modulation depths of the flanking SAM tones increased from 0% to 100%. When the on-frequency SAM tone had a modulation depth of 63%, some listeners performed optimally when the flanking SAM tones also exhibited a modulation depth of 63%, whereas others performed best when the flankers had modulation depths of 100%. With regard to signal position, a typical CMR effect was observed when the signal, consisting of a train of three 50-ms, 700-Hz tone bursts, was placed in the dips of the on-frequency masker. However, when the signal was placed at the peaks of the envelope, an increase in masking was observed for a comodulated masker.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and test frequency

Comodulation masking release (CMR) was investigated as a function of signal frequency (0.5-4.0 kHz) and the total bandwidth of noise centered on the signal frequency. Taking noncomodulated noise of the same bandwidth as the reference condition, CMR for modulated noise increased with increasing bandwidth of the flanking noise outside the critical band centered on the signal tone; however, this growth asymptoted for broad total bandwidths. These bandwidth effects were expressed by scaling the width of the flanking bands beyond the critical band centered on the signal frequency, approximately according to a critical bandwidth scale. After this scaling, signal frequency had negligible effect on CMR magnitude. For the low modulation frequencies involved, a beneficial effect on CMR at high carrier frequencies would not be expected, and none was observed. Some further trends in the masked thresholds in comodulated and noncomodulated conditions, and the choice of appropriate reference condition are discussed.     

Comodulation masking release: effects of varying the level, duration, and time delay of the cue band

The phenomenon of comodulation masking release (CMR) was studied in a series of experiments. When the relative level of the correlated cue band was more than about 10 dB less than that of the masker band, the CMR was abolished. When the duration of the tonal signal was varied with continuous maskers and cues, the course of the standard temporal-integration function (about -10 dB/decade) was followed by both the correlated-cue and the uncorrelated-cue conditions. In a burst masker paradigm employing several burst durations, the data for the correlated-cue condition closely followed the previously determined temporal-integration function. Finally, when the cue band was time delayed more than about 1.6 ms, the CMR began to decline, and it was abolished somewhere between 3 and 15 ms of delay, depending upon the subject. This latter outcome was essentially the same for masker and cue bands of both 75 and 100 Hz in width; in neither instance was there evidence of a cyclic, autocorrelation-like pattern following the period of the envelope. Supplementary experiments revealed two facts: The detectability of a masked narrow-band signal is not improved by the simultaneous presence of a correlated (or uncorrelated) noise band, and a small CMR can be obtained under conditions of forward masking.     

Comodulation masking release in speech identification with real and simulated cochlear-implant hearing

For normal-hearing (NH) listeners, masker energy outside the spectral region of a target signal can improve target detection and identification, a phenomenon referred to as comodulation masking release (CMR). This study examined whether, for cochlear implant (CI) listeners and for NH listeners presented with a "noise vocoded" CI simulation, speech identification in modulated noise is improved by a co-modulated flanking band. In Experiment 1, NH listeners identified noise-vocoded speech in a background of on-target noise with or without a flanking narrow band of noise outside the spectral region of the target. The on-target noise and flanker were either 16-Hz square-wave modulated with the same phase or were unmodulated; the speech was taken from a closed-set corpus. Performance was better in modulated than in unmodulated noise, and this difference was slightly greater when the comodulated flanker was present, consistent with a small CMR of about 1.7 dB for noise-vocoded speech. Experiment 2, which tested CI listeners using the same speech materials, found no advantage for modulated versus unmodulated maskers and no CMR. Thus although NH listeners can benefit from CMR even for speech signals with reduced spectro-temporal detail, no CMR was observed for CI users.     

Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and time delay between on-frequency and flanking-band maskers

The threshold for a signal masked by a narrow band of noise centered at the signal frequency (the on-frequency band) may be reduced by adding to the masker a second band of noise (the flanking band) whose envelope is correlated with that of the first band, an effect called comodulation masking release (CMR). This paper examines CMR as a function of masker bandwidth and time delay between the envelopes of the on-frequency and flanking bands. The 1.0-kHz sinusoidal signal had a duration of 400 ms. The on-frequency band was presented alone (reference condition) or with the flanking band. The flanking-band envelope was either correlated or uncorrelated with that of the on-frequency band. Flanking-band center frequencies ranged from 0.25-2.0 kHz. The flanking band was presented either in the same ear as the on-frequency band (monaural condition) or in the opposite ear (dichotic condition). The noise bands had bandwidths of 6.25, 25, or 100 Hz. In the correlated conditions, the flanking-band envelope was delayed with respect to that of the on-frequency band by 0, 5, 10, or 20 ms. For the 100-Hz bandwidth, CMRs were small (typically less than 1 dB) in both monaural and dichotic conditions at all delay times. For the 25-Hz bandwidth, CMRs were about 3.5 dB for the 0-ms delay, and decreased to about 1.5 dB for the 20-ms delay. For the 6.25-Hz bandwidth, CMRs averaged about 5 dB and were almost independent of delay time. The results suggest that the absolute delay time is not the critical variable determining CMR. The magnitude of CMR appears to depend on the correlation between the envelopes of the on-frequency and flanking bands. However, the results do not support a model of CMR that assumes that signal threshold corresponds to a constant change in across-band envelope correlation when the correlation is transformed to Fisher's z.     

Comodulation masking release for various monaural and binaural combinations of the signal, on-frequency, and flanking bands

The threshold for a signal masked by a narrow band of noise centered at the signal frequency (the on-frequency band) may be reduced by adding to the masker a second band of noise (the flanking band) whose envelope is correlated with that of the first band. This effect is called comodulation masking release (CMR). These experiments examine two questions. (1) How does the CMR vary with the number and ear of presentation of the flanking band(s)? (2) Is it possible to obtain a CMR when a binaural masking level difference (BMLD) is already present, and vice versa? Thresholds were measured for a 400-ms signal in a continuous 25-Hz-wide noise centered at signal frequencies (fs) of 250, 1000, and 4000 Hz. This masker was presented either alone or with one or more continuous flanking bands whose envelopes were either correlated or uncorrelated with that of the on-frequency band; their frequencies ranged from 0.5fs to 1.5fs. CMRs were measured for six conditions in which the signal, the on-frequency band, and the flanking band(s) were presented in various monaural and binaural combinations. When a single flanking band was used, the CMR was typically around 2-3 dB. The CMR increased to 5-6 dB if an additional flanking band was added. The effect of the additional band was similar whether it was in the same ear as the original band or in the opposite ear. At the lowest signal frequency, a large CMR was observed in addition to a BMLD and vice versa. At the highest signal frequency, the extra release from masking was small. The results are interpreted in terms of the cues producing the CMR and the BMLD.     

Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration

These experiments examine how comodulation masking release (CMR) varies with masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration. In experiment 1, thresholds were measured for a 400-ms, 2000-Hz signal masked by continuous noise varying in bandwidth from 50-3200 Hz in 1-oct steps. In one condition, using random noise maskers, thresholds increased with increasing bandwidth up to 400 Hz and then remained approximately constant. In another set of conditions, the masker was multiplied (amplitude modulated) by a low-pass noise (bandwidth varied from 12.5-400 Hz in 1-oct steps). This produced correlated envelope fluctuations across frequency. Thresholds were generally lower than for random noise maskers with the same bandwidth. For maskers less than one critical band wide, the release from masking was largest (about 5 dB) for maskers with low rates of modulation (12.5-Hz-wide low-pass modulator). It is argued that this release from masking is not a "true" CMR but results from a within-channel cue. For broadband maskers (greater than 400 Hz), the release from masking increased with increasing masker bandwidth and decreasing modulator bandwidth, reaching an asymptote of 12 dB for a masker bandwidth of 800 Hz and a modulator bandwidth of 50 Hz. Most of this release from masking can be attributed to a CMR. In experiment 2, the modulator bandwidth was fixed at 12.5 Hz and the signal duration was varied. For masker bandwidths greater than 400 Hz, the CMR decreased from 12 to 5 dB as the signal duration was decreased from 400 to 25 ms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Binaural comodulation masking release: effects of masker interaural correlation

Binaural detection was examined for a signal presented in a narrow band of noise centered on the on-signal masking band (OSB) or in the presence of flanking noise bands that were random or comodulated with respect to the OSB. The noise had an interaural correlation of 1.0 (No), 0.99 or 0.95. In No noise, random flanking bands worsened Spi detection and comodulated bands improved Spi detection for some listeners but had no effect for other listeners. For the 0.99 or 0.95 interaural correlation conditions, random flanking bands were less detrimental to Spi detection and comodulated flanking bands improved Spi detection for all listeners. Analyses based on signal detection theory indicated that the improvement in Spi thresholds obtained with comodulated bands was not compatible with an optimal combination of monaural and binaural cues or to across-frequency analyses of dynamic interaural phase differences. Two accounts consistent with the improvement in Spi thresholds in comodulated noise were (1) envelope information carried by the flanking bands improves the weighting of binaural cues associated with the signal; (2) the auditory system is sensitive to across-frequency differences in ongoing interaural correlation.     

Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band

In experiment I, thresholds for 400-ms sinusoidal signals were measured in the presence of a continuous 25-Hz-wide noise centered at signal frequencies (fs) ranging from 250 to 8000 Hz in 1-oct steps. The masker was presented either alone or together with a second continuous 25-Hz-wide band of noise (the flanking band) whose envelope was either correlated with that of the on-frequency band or was uncorrelated; its center frequency ranged from 0.5 fs to 1.5 fs. The flanking band was presented either in the same ear (monotic condition) as the signal plus masker or in the opposite ear (dichotic condition). The on-frequency band and the flanking band each had an overall level of 67 dB SPL. The comodulation masking release, CMR (U-C), is defined as the difference between the thresholds for the uncorrelated and correlated conditions. The CMR (U-C) showed two components: a broadly tuned component, occurring at all signal frequencies and all flanking-band frequencies, and occurring for both monotic and dichotic conditions; and a component restricted to the monotic condition and to flanking-band frequencies close to fs. This sharply tuned component was small for low signal frequencies, increased markedly at 2000 and 4000 Hz, and decreased at 8000 Hz. Experiment II showed that the sharply tuned component of the CMR (U-C) was slightly reduced in magnitude when the level of the flanking band was 10 dB above that of the on-frequency band and was markedly reduced when the level was 10 dB below, whereas the broadly tuned component and the dichotic CMR (U-C) were only slightly affected. Experiment III showed that the sharply tuned component of the CMR (U-C) was markedly reduced when the bandwidths of the on-frequency and flanking bands were increased to 100 Hz, while the broadly tuned component and the dichotic CMR (U-C) decreased only slightly. The argument here is that the sharply tuned component of the monotic CMR (U-C) results from beating between the "carrier" frequencies of the two masker bands. This introduces periodic zeros in the masker envelope, which facilitate signal detection. The broadly tuned component, which is probably a "true" CMR, was only about 3 dB.     

Within-channel cues to comodulation masking release for single and symmetrically placed pairs of flanking bands

Comodulation masking release (CMR) as measured in a flanking-band (FB) paradigm is often larger when the FBs are close to the signal frequency, f(s), than when they are remote from f(s), an effect which may be partly due to the use of within-channel cues. Schooneveldt and Moore [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 262-272 (1989)] reported that, for f(s) = 1000 Hz, this effect was larger when a single FB was used than when there were two FBs symmetrically placed about f(s), and proposed that there are within-channel cues that are available for a single FB, but not for a symmetrically placed pair of FBs. The present study replicated and extended their study. Although CMR was larger for two symmetrically placed FBs than for a single FB, the effect of FB proximity to f(s) did not differ for the two cases. The results do not support the idea that there are additional within-channel cues that are available for a single FB. Changes in the regularity of temporal fine structure and changes in the prevalence of low-amplitude envelope portions are both plausible within-channel cues.     

Within-channel cues in comodulation masking release (CMR): experiments and model predictions using a modulation-filterbank model

Experiments and model calculations were performed to study the influence of within-channel cues versus across-channel cues in comodulation masking release (CMR). A class of CMR experiments is considered that are characterized by a single (unmodulated or modulated) bandpass noise masker with variable bandwidth centered at the signal frequency. A modulation-filterbank model suggested by Dau et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2892-2905 (1997)] was employed to quantitatively predict the experimental data. Effects of varying masker bandwidth, center frequency, modulator bandwidth, modulator type, and signal duration on CMR were examined. In addition, the effect of band limiting the noise before or after modulation was shown to influence the CMR in the same way as a systematic variation of the modulation depth. It is demonstrated that a single-channel analysis, which analyzes only the information from one peripheral channel, quantitatively accounts for the CMR in most cases, indicating that an across-channel process is generally not necessary for simulating results from this class of CMR experiments. True across-channel processes may be found in another class of CMR experiments.     

Rhythmic masking release: contribution of cues for perceptual organization to the cross-spectral fusion of concurrent narrow-band noises

The contribution of temporal asynchrony, spatial separation, and frequency separation to the cross-spectral fusion of temporally contiguous brief narrow-band noise bursts was studied using the Rhythmic Masking Release paradigm (RMR). RMR involves the discrimination of one of two possible rhythms, despite perceptual masking of the rhythm by an irregular sequence of sounds identical to the rhythmic bursts, interleaved among them. The release of the rhythm from masking can be induced by causing the fusion of the irregular interfering sounds with concurrent "flanking" sounds situated in different frequency regions. The accuracy and the rated clarity of the identified rhythm in a 2-AFC procedure were employed to estimate the degree of fusion of the interferring sounds with flanking sounds. The results suggest that while synchrony fully fuses short-duration noise bursts across frequency and across space (i.e., across ears and loudspeakers), an asynchrony of 20-40 ms produces no fusion. Intermediate asynchronies of 10-20 ms produce partial fusion, where the presence of other cues is critical for unambiguous grouping. Though frequency and spatial separation reduced fusion, neither of these manipulations was sufficient to abolish it. For the parameters varied in this study, stimulus onset asynchrony was the dominant cue determining fusion, but there were additive effects of the other cues. Temporal synchrony appears to be critical in determining whether brief sounds with abrupt onsets and offsets are heard as one event or more than one.     

Temporal decline of masking and comodulation masking release.

Masking sounds can be continuously present, gated simultaneously with the signal, or gated somewhat prior to the signal. This continuum of relative onset times was explored using waveforms of the sort commonly employed in studies of comodulation masking release (CMR). There was a 50-Hz masker band centered on the 1250-Hz tonal signal, and four 50-Hz flanker bands centered at 850, 1050, 1450, and 1650 Hz. In some conditions, all four flanker bands had the same temporal envelope, and the masker band either had that same envelope (correlated presentations) or a different envelope (uncorrelated presentations). In other conditions, all five bands had different temporal envelopes (all-uncorrelated presentations). The masker band and/or the four flanker bands were either gated nearly simultaneously with the signal (burst conditions) or were gated prior to the signal by a duration that was systematically varied (fringed conditions). The eight listeners could be partitioned into three groups on the basis of their response to these fringing manipulations. Two listeners (the large fringers) showed a gradual improvement in detectability with increasing fringe duration (called a temporal decline of masking), while three others (the small fringers) showed little improvement in detectability. For the remaining three subjects, there was evidence of a "learning" effect that changed them from large fringers to small fringers over a 10-week period of listening. When present, the temporal decline of masking was greater for the correlated than for the uncorrelated comodulation condition; as a consequence, the difference in detectability between them (the comodulation masking release or CMR) increased with fringe duration. By fringing the masker and flanker bands separately and in combination, it was revealed that the temporal declines of masking were primarily attributable to the fringing of the flanker bands. In contrast, large CMRs required long fringes on both the masker and flanker bands. The above results were obtained with 50-ms signals, but generally similar data were obtained with a signal duration of 240 ms. The difficulties raised for experimentalists and theorists by such long-term practice effects are discussed.     

Spatial release from masking in normal-hearing children and children who use hearing aids

Listening to speech in competing sounds poses a major difficulty for children with impaired hearing. This study aimed to determine the ability of children (3-12 yr of age) to use spatial separation between target speech and competing babble to improve speech intelligibility. Fifty-eight children (31 with normal hearing and 27 with impaired hearing who use bilateral hearing aids) were assessed by word and sentence material. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured with speech presented from 0° azimuth, and competing babble from either 0° or ±90° azimuth. Spatial release from masking (SRM) was defined as the difference between SRTs measured with co-located speech and babble and SRTs measured with spatially separated speech and babble. On average, hearing-impaired children attained near-normal performance when speech and babble originated from the frontal source, but performed poorer than their normal-hearing peers when babble was spatially separated from target speech. On average, normal-hearing children obtained an SRM of 3 dB whereas children with hearing loss did not demonstrate SRM. Results suggest that hearing-impaired children may need enhancement in signal-to-noise ratio to hear speech in difficult listening conditions as well as normal-hearing children.     

The effect of signal-frequency uncertainty on comodulation masking release

The aim of this study was to examine whether the scheme of across-frequency comparison underlying comodulation masking release (CMR) is sensitive to the placement of the signal in the array of comodulating bands. This was addressed using the paradigm of signal-frequency uncertainty. In the first experiment, maskers were constructed of linearly spaced sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones, and the signal was a pure tone presented at one of five frequencies. A small uncertainty effect was observed for the noncomodulated masker, but no significant effect was observed for the comodulated masker. In the second experiment, the maskers were constructed of logarithmically spaced noise bands, and the signal was a pure tone presented at one of seven frequencies. In these conditions, an uncertainty effect was observed in both noncomodulated and comodulated maskers, which was larger than that observed in experiment 1. The results were interpreted as indicating that the mechanism of across-frequency comparison underlying CMR is sensitive to signal location.     

The role of visual speech cues in reducing energetic and informational masking

Two experiments compared the effect of supplying visual speech information (e.g., lipreading cues) on the ability to hear one female talker's voice in the presence of steady-state noise or a masking complex consisting of two other female voices. In the first experiment intelligibility of sentences was measured in the presence of the two types of maskers with and without perceived spatial separation of target and masker. The second study tested detection of sentences in the same experimental conditions. Results showed that visual cues provided more benefit for both recognition and detection of speech when the masker consisted of other voices (versus steady-state noise). Moreover, visual cues provided greater benefit when the target speech and masker were spatially coincident versus when they appeared to arise from different spatial locations. The data obtained here are consistent with the hypothesis that lipreading cues help to segregate a target voice from competing voices, in addition to the established benefit of supplementing masked phonetic information.