Synthesis,Characterization, and DNA‐Binding Properties of the Chiral Ruthenium(II) Complexes Δ‐ and Λ‐[Ru(bpy)2(dmppd)]2+ (dmppd = 10,12‐Dimethylpteridino[6,7‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline‐11,13(10H,12H)‐dione; bpy = 2,2′‐Bipyridine)

Two novel chiral ruthenium(II) complexes, Δ‐[Ru(bpy)₂(dmppd)]²⁺ and Λ‐[Ru(bpy)₂(dmppd)]²⁺ (dmppd = 10,12‐dimethylpteridino[6,7‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline‐11,13(10H,12H)‐dione, bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine), were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, ¹H‐NMR and ES‐MS. The DNA‐binding behaviors of both complexes were studied by UV/VIS absorption titration, competitive binding experiments, viscosity measurements, thermal DNA denaturation, and circular‐dichroism spectra. The results indicate that both chiral complexes bind to calf‐thymus DNA in an intercalative mode, and the Δ enantiomer shows larger DNA affinity than the Λ enantiomer does. Theoretical‐calculation studies for the DNA‐binding behaviors of these complexes were carried out by the density‐functional‐theory method. The mechanism involved in the regulating and controlling of the DNA‐binding abilities of the complexes was further explored by the comparative studies of [Ru(bpy)₂(dmppd)]²⁺ and of its parent complex [Ru(bpy)₂(ppd)]²⁺ (ppd = pteridino[6,7‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline‐11,13 (10H,12H)‐dione).     

Inert benzothiazole functionalised ruthenium(II) complexes; potential DNA hairpin binding agents

The two enantiomers of [Ru(bpy)2(bbtb)]2+{bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine; bbtb = 4,4'-bis(benzothiazol-2-yl)-2,2'-bipyridine} have been isolated and fully characterised. Both enantiomers have been shown to have a strong association with calf thymus DNA by UV/visible absorption, emission and CD spectroscopy, with the Lambda enantiomer having the greater affinity. The binding of both enantiomeric forms of [Ru(bpy)2(Me2bpy)]2+ and [Ru(bpy)2(bbtb)]2+{Me(2)bpy = 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine} to a range of oligonucleotides, including an octadecanucleotide and an icosanucleotide which contain hairpin-sequences, have been studied using a fluorescent intercalator displacement (FID) assay. The complex [Ru(bpy)2(bbtb)]2+ exhibited an interesting association with hairpin oligonucleotides, again with the Lambda enantiomer binding more strongly. A (1)H NMR spectroscopic study of the binding of both enantiomers of [Ru(bpy)2(bbtb)]2+ to the icosanucleotide d(CACTGGTCTCTCTACCAGTG) was conducted. This sequence contains a seven-base-pair duplex stem and a six-base hairpin-loop. The investigation gave an indication of the relative binding of the complexes between the two different regions (duplex and secondary structure) of the oligonucleotide. The results suggest that both enantiomers bind at the hairpin, with the ruthenium centre located at the stem-loop interface. NOE studies indicate that one of the two benzothiazole substituents of the bbtb ligand projects into the loop-region. A simple model of the metal complex/oligonucleotide adduct was obtained by means of molecular modelling simulations. The results from this study suggest that benzothiazole complexes derived from inert polypyridine ruthenium(II) complexes could lead to the development of new fluorescent DNA hairpin binding agents.     

手性钌(Ⅱ)配合物对DNA的立体选择性断裂

八面体钌(Ⅱ)多吡啶配合物与双螺旋DNA插入结合后具有较强的结合能力,并且含有一个具有氧化一还原活性的中心金属离子．它们对氧化剂相对比较稳定,但对光比较敏感,因此可利用光辐射使之产生单线态氧或羟基自由基等而使DNA裂解．此外,这些配合物具有左手∧-和右手△-两种构型,与同样具有手性的DNA作用时,存在着立体选择性结合．并且在对DNA的断裂反应中也存在一定的立体选择性,可作为不同构型DNA的结构探针．     

Binding Behaviors for Different Types of DNA G‐Quadruplexes: Enantiomers of [Ru(bpy)2(L)]2+ (L=dppz,dppz‐idzo)

Polymorphic DNA G‐quadruplex recognition has attracted great interest in recent years. The strong binding affinity and potential enantioselectivity of chiral [Ru(bpy)₂(L)]²⁺ (L=dipyrido[3,2‐a:2′,3′‐c]phenazine, dppz‐10,11‐imidazolone; bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine) prompted this investigation as to whether the two enantiomers, Δ and Λ, can show different effects on diverse structures with a range of parallel, antiparallel and mixed parallel/antiparallel G‐quadruplexes. These studies provide a striking example of chiral‐selective recognition of DNA G‐quadruplexes. As for antiparallel (tel‐Na⁺) basket G‐quadruplex, the Λ enantiomers bind stronger than the Δ enantiomers. Moreover, the behavior reported here for both enantiomers stands in sharp contrast to B‐DNA binding. The chiral selectivity toward mixed parallel/antiparallel (tel‐K⁺) G‐quadruplex of both compounds is weak. Different loop arrangements can change chiral complex selectivity for both antiparallel and mixed parallel/antiparallel G‐quadruplex. Whereas both Δ and Λ isomers bind to parallel G‐quadruplexes with comparable affinity, no appreciable stereoselective G‐quadruplex binding of the isomers was observed. In addition, different binding stoichiometries and binding modes for Δ and Λ enantiomers were confirmed. The results presented here indicate that chiral selective G‐quadruplex binding is not only related to G‐quadruplex topology, but also to the sequence and the loop constitution.     

Synthesis,Characterization, and DNA Interaction Studies of the Ruthenium(II) Complexes [Ru(bpy)2(ipbp)]2+ and [Ru(ipbp)(phen)2]2+ (ipbp=3‐(1H‐Imidazo[4,5‐f][1,10]phenanthrolin‐2‐yl)‐4H‐1‐benzopyran‐2‐one; bpy=2,2′‐Bipyridine; phen=1,10‐Phenanthroline)

A novel ligand 3‐(1H‐imidazo[4,5‐f][1,10]phenanthrolin‐2‐yl)‐4H‐1‐benzopyran‐4‐one (ipbp) and its ruthenium(II) complexes [Ru(bpy)₂(ipbp)]²⁺ ( 1 ) and [Ru(ipbp)(phen)₂]²⁺ ( 2 ) (bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine, phen=1,10‐phenanthroline) were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis and mass, ¹H‐NMR, and electronic‐absorption spectroscopy. The electrochemical behavior of the complexes was studied by cyclic voltammetry. The DNA‐binding behavior of the complexes was investigated by spectroscopic methods and viscosity measurements. The results indicate that complexes 1 and 2 bind with calf‐thymus DNA in an intercalative mode. In addition, 1 and 2 promote cleavage of plasmid pBR 322 DNA from the supercoil form I to the open circular form II upon irradiation.     

DNA-binding and photoactivated cleavage of enantiomeric ruthenium(II) complexes

A set of enantiomeric Ru^II complexes Δ- and Λ-[Ru(bpy)₂TAPTP](PF₆)₂(bpy=2,2’-bipyridine, TAPTP=4,5,9,18-tetraazaphenanthreno[9,10-b]triphenylene) have been synthesized and characterized. Binding of both enantiomers to calf thymus DNA has been studied by spectroscopic methods, viscosity, and equilibrium dialysis. The experimental results indicated that both enantiomers bind to DNA by intercalation. Upon irradiation at 302 nm, both enantiomers were found to promote the cleavage of plasmid pBR 322 DNA from supercoiled form I to a nicked form II, and obvious enantioselectively was observed on DNA cleavage, the Λ- enantiomer exhibiting higher cleaving efficiency. The mechanisms for DNA cleavage by the two enantiomers are also proposed.     

一个嫁接有羧酸羟基乙基酯的二吡啶吩嗪Ru(II)配合物的合成、与DNA的相互作用以及溶剂变色性质的研究

合成并表征了一个新的Ru(II)配合物[Ru(bpy)₂(hedppc)](ClO₄)₂ {bpy＝2,2'-联吡啶, hedppc＝二联吡啶[3,2-a: 2',3'-c]吩嗪-11-羧酸(2-羟乙基)酯}. 通过紫外-可见吸收光谱、与溴化乙锭竞争实验、粘度测量和DNA裂解实验研究了配合物与小牛胸腺DNA的相互作用性质. 结果表明配合物以插入模式与DNA键合,键合常数K_b＝(6.99±1.34)×10⁶ mol^－1•L (s＝2.03±0.04)与母体配合物[Ru(bpy)₂ (dppz)]^2＋相近,但光致发光和溶剂变色等光学性质与[Ru(bpy)₂ (dppz)]^2＋有明显的差别.     

DNA Interactions of the Functionalized (Mixed Polypyridine)ruthenium(II) Complex Bis(2,2′‐bipyridine‐κN1,κN1′)(methyl dipyrido[3,2‐a : 2′,3′‐c]phenazine‐11‐carboxylate‐κN4,κN5)ruthenium(2+) ([Ru(bpy)2(dppz‐11‐CO2Me)]2+)

A novel polypyridine ligand, dipyrido[3,2‐a:2′,3′‐c]phenazine‐11‐carboxylic acid methyl ester (=dppz‐11‐CO₂Me), and its ruthenium(II) complex, [Ru(bpy)₂(dppz‐11‐CO₂Me)]²⁺ ( 1 ), were synthesized and characterized. The binding properties of this complex to calf‐thymus DNA (CT‐DNA) were investigated by different spectrophotometric methods and viscosity measurements. The results suggest that the complex binds to DNA in an intercalative mode and serves as a molecular ‘light switch’ for DNA. When irradiated at 365 nm, the complex 1 promoted the photocleavage of plasmid pBR‐322 DNA.     

The photocleavage properties of a novel ruthenium(II) complex on liver cancer cells Bel-7402 DNA

A novel ruthenium(II) complex [Ru(bpy)₂DMHPIP] (DMHPIP = 2-(3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl)imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline) (1) has been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, ¹H-NMR and ESI-MS. The DNA binding properties of the complex has also been investigated by electronic spectra and emission spectra, and the results show that complex (1) bind to DNA with high affinity. On the other hand, the photocleavage property of complex (1) on liver cancer cells lines Bel-7402 DNA has been investigated by electrophoresis agarose gels, and the results show that the complex can promote liver cancer cells Bel-7402 DNA from the supercoiled form to the nicked form excellently.     

DNA Sequence and Ancillary Ligand Modulate the Biexponential Emission Decay of Intercalated [Ru(L)2dppz]2+ Enantiomers

The bi‐exponential emission decay of [Ru(L)₂dppz]²⁺ (L=N,N′‐diimine ligand) bound to DNA has been studied as a function of polynucleotide sequence, enantiomer, and nature of L (phenanthroline vs. bipyridine). The lifetimes (τ_i) and pre‐exponential factors (α_i) depend on all three parameters. With [poly(dA‐dT)]₂, the variation of α_i with [Nu]/[Ru] has little dependence on L for Λ‐[Ru(L)₂dppz]²⁺ but a substantial dependence for Δ‐[Ru(L)₂dppz]²⁺. With [poly(dG‐dC)]₂, by contrast, the Λ‐enantiomer α_i values depend strongly on the nature of L, whereas those of the Δ‐enantiomer are relatively unaffected. DNA‐bound linked dimers show similar photophysical behaviour. The lifetimes are identified with two geometries of minor‐groove intercalated [Ru(L)₂dppz]²⁺, resulting in differential water access to the phenazine nitrogen atoms. Interplay of cooperative and anti‐cooperative binding resulting from complex–complex and complex–DNA interactions is responsible for the observed variations of α_i with binding ratio. [Ru(phen)₂dppz]²⁺ emission is quenched by guanosine in DMF, which may further rationalise the shorter lifetimes observed with guanine‐rich DNA.     

双核钌(II)多吡啶配合物与酵母RNA的相互作用研究

用紫外-可见吸收光谱和荧光光谱滴定、稳态荧光淬灭和反向盐滴定实验研究了双核钌(II)配合物[(bpy)₂Ru(ebipcH₂)Ru(bpy)₂](ClO₄)₄ {bpy＝2,2'-联吡啶; ebipcH₂＝N-乙基-4,7-二(咪唑-[4,5-f]-(1,10-邻菲啰啉)-2-基)咔唑}与酵母RNA的相互作用. 结果表明该双核配合物以插入方式与酵母RNA作用, 在生理盐浓度下(≈150 mmol/L NaCl)该配合物与RNA的相互作用明显强于DNA.     

Experimental and Theoretical Studies on DNA‐Binding and Spectral Properties of ‘Light Switch’ Complexes [Ru(L)2(ppn)]2+ (L=2,2′‐Bipyridine and 1,10‐Phenanthroline; ppn=Pteridino[6,7‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline‐11,13‐diamine)

The ligand pteridino[6,7‐f] [1,10]phenanthroline‐11,13‐diamine (ppn) and its Ru^II complexes [Ru(bpy)₂(ppn)]²⁺ ( 1 ; bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine) and [Ru(phen)₂(ppn)]²⁺ ( 2 ; phen=1,10‐phenanthroline) were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, electrospray MS, ¹H‐NMR, and cyclic voltammetry. The DNA‐binding behaviors of 1 and 2 were studied by spectroscopic and viscosity measurements. The results indicate that both complexes strongly bind to calf‐thymus DNA in an intercalative mode, with DNA‐binding constants K_b of (1.7±0.4)?10⁶ M ^?1 and (2.6±0.2)?10⁶ M ^?1, respectively. The complexes 1 and 2 exhibit excellent DNA‐‘light switch’ performances, i.e., they do not (or extremely weakly) show luminescence in aqueous solution at room temperature but are strongly luminescent in the presence of DNA. In particular, the experimental results suggest that the ancillary ligands bpy and phen not only have a significant effect on the DNA‐binding affinities of 1 and 2 but also have a certain effect on their spectral properties. [Ru(phen)₂(ppn)]²⁺( 2 ) might be developed into a very prospective DNA‐‘light switch’ complex. To explain the DNA‐binding and spectral properties of 1 and 2 , theoretical calculations were also carried out applying the DFT/TDDFT method.     

DNA intercalating studies of [Ru(bpy)<Subscript>2</Subscript>HPIP]<Superscript>2+</Superscript> with intramolecular hydrogen bond ligand based on introduction of copper ion

The effects of copper ion on the interaction of [Ru(bpy)₂HPIP]²⁺(bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, HPIP = 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl) imidazo [4,5-f] [1, 10] phenanthroline) with DNA have been investigated by electronic absorption spectroscopy and fluorescence spectroscopy. HPIP ligand of the complex with an intramolecular hydrogen bond can bind Cu²⁺ in the absence of DNA, as revealed by the absorbance and fluorescence decrease for [Ru(bpy)₂HPIP]²⁺. The resultant heterometallic complex binds to DNA via intercalation of HPIP into the DNA base pairs and its DNA-binding ability is stronger than [Ru(bpy)₂HPIP]²⁺ itself. The DNA bound [Ru(bpy)₂HPIP]²⁺ cannot bind Cu²⁺ at low Cu²⁺ concentration and the intramolecular hydrogen bond in HPIP is located inside the DNA helix. While the Cu²⁺ concentration is relative high, Cu²⁺ can quench the fluorescence of DNA bound [Ru(bpy)₂HPIP]²⁺. The quenching reason is proposed.     

A New Heteroleptic Ruthenium(II) Polypyridyl Complex with Long‐Wavelength Absorption and High Singlet‐Oxygen Quantum Yield

Ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes with long‐wavelength absorption and high singlet‐oxygen quantum yield exhibit attractive potential in photodynamic therapy. A new heteroleptic Ru^II polypyridyl complex, [Ru(bpy)(dpb)(dppn)]²⁺ (bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine, dpb=2,3‐bis(2‐pyridyl)benzoquinoxaline, dppn=4,5,9,16‐tetraaza‐dibenzo[a,c]naphthacene), is reported, which exhibits a ¹MLCT (MLCT: metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer) maximum as long as 548 nm and a singlet‐oxygen quantum yield as high as 0.43. Steady/transient absorption/emission spectra indicate that the lowest‐energy MLCT state localizes on the dpb ligand, whereas the high singlet‐oxygen quantum yield results from the relatively long ³MLCT(Ru→dpb) lifetime, which in turn is the result of the equilibrium between nearly isoenergetic excited states of ³MLCT(Ru→dpb) and ³ππ*(dppn). The dppn ligand also ensures a high binding affinity of the complex towards DNA. Thus, the combination of dpb and dppn gives the complex promising photodynamic activity, fully demonstrating the modularity and versatility of heteroleptic Ru^II complexes. In contrast, [Ru(bpy)₂(dpb)]²⁺ shows a long‐wavelength ¹MLCT maximum (551 nm) but a very low singlet‐oxygen quantum yield (0.22), and [Ru(bpy)₂(dppn)]²⁺ shows a high singlet‐oxygen quantum yield (0.79) but a very short wavelength ¹MLCT maximum (442 nm).     

Tuning the Electronic Properties in Ruthenium–Quinone Complexes through Metal Coordination and Substitution at the Bridge

A rare example of a mononuclear complex [(bpy)₂Ru(L¹_?H)](ClO₄), 1 (ClO₄) and dinuclear complexes [(bpy)₂Ru(μ‐L¹_?2H)Ru(bpy)₂](ClO₄)₂, 2 (ClO₄)₂, [(bpy)₂Ru(μ‐L²_?2H)Ru(bpy)₂](ClO₄)₂, 3 (ClO₄)₂, and [(bpy)₂Ru(μ‐L³_?2H)Ru(bpy)₂](ClO₄)₂, 4 (ClO₄)₂ (bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine, L¹=2,5‐di‐(isopropyl‐amino)‐1,4‐benzoquinone, L²=2,5‐di‐(benzyl‐amino)‐1,4‐benzoquinone, and L³=2,5‐di‐[2,4,6‐(trimethyl)‐anilino]‐1,4‐benzoquinone) with the symmetrically substituted p‐quinone ligands, L, are reported. Bond‐length analysis within the potentially bridging ligands in both the mono‐ and dinuclear complexes shows a localization of bonds, and binding to the metal centers through a phenolate‐type “O^?” and an immine/imminium‐type neutral “N” donor. For the mononuclear complex 1 (ClO₄), this facilitates strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding and leads to the imminium‐type character of the noncoordinated nitrogen atom. The dinuclear complexes display two oxidation and several reduction steps in acetonitrile solutions. In contrast, the mononuclear complex 1 ⁺ exhibits just one oxidation and several reduction steps. The redox processes of 1 ¹⁺ are strongly dependent on the solvent. The one‐electron oxidized forms 2 ³⁺, 3 ³⁺, and 4 ³⁺ of the dinuclear complexes exhibit strong absorptions in the NIR region. Weak NIR absorption bands are observed for the one‐electron reduced forms of all complexes. A combination of structural data, electrochemistry, UV/Vis/NIR/EPR spectroelectrochemistry, and DFT calculations is used to elucidate the electronic structures of the complexes. Our DFT results indicate that the electronic natures of the various redox states of the complexes in vacuum differ greatly from those in a solvent continuum. We show here the tuning possibilities that arise upon substituting [O] for the isoelectronic [NR] groups in such quinone ligands.     

Diruthenium Complexes of p‐Benzoquinone–Imidazole Hybrid Ligands: Innocent or Noninnocent Behavior of the Quinone Moiety

After double deprotonation, 2,6‐diaryl‐p‐benzoquinonodiimidazoles (aryl=4‐tolyl ( I ) or 2‐pyridyl ( II )) were shown to bridge two [Ru(bpy)₂]²⁺ (bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine) complex fragments through the imidazolate N and p‐quinone O ( I → 1 ²⁺) or through the imidazolate N and pyridyl N donor atoms ( II → 2 ²⁺). Characterization by crystal structure analysis, ¹H/¹³C NMR spectroscopy, cyclic and differential pulse voltammetry, and spectroelectrochemistry (UV/Vis/NIR, IR, EPR) in combination with TD‐DFT calculations revealed surprisingly different electronic structures for redox systems 1 ⁿ and 2 ⁿ. Whereas 1 ²⁺ is reduced to a radical complex with considerable semiquinone character, the reduction of 2 ²⁺ with its exclusive N coordination exhibits little spin on the now redox‐innocent quinone moiety, compared with the electron uptake by the pyridyl–imidazolate chelating site. The first of two close‐lying oxidation processes occurs at the bridging heteroquinone ligand, whereas the second oxidation is partly ( 1 ⁴⁺) or predominantly ( 2 ⁴⁺) centered on the metal atoms.     

Efficient DNA binding by optically Pure Ruthenium Tris(bipyridyl) complexes incorporating carboxylic functionalities. Solution and structural analysis

Herein, we report on the binding of optically pure ruthenium complexes Delta- or Lambda-[Ru(bpy)(2)(L-L)][PF(6)](2) [L-L = Hcmbpy = 4-carboxy-4'-methyl-2,2'-bipyridine (1), L-L = H(2)dcbpy = 4,4'-dicarboxy-2,2'-bipyridine (2)] to DNA. The binding constants of the two enantiomeric Delta-1 and Lambda-1 complexes to DNA were estimated from titration monitored by (1)H NMR spectroscopy. 2D transferred NOESY (TRNOESY) experiments support the conclusion that Delta-1 and Lambda-1 bind to DNA and that an intermediate-to-fast exchange occurs between bound and free Ru(II) complex. Further, evidence for enantioselective DNA cleavage by Delta-2 is provided by means of gel electrophoresis performed in the presence and in the absence of light; in contrast, the Lambda-2 enantiomer does not. The IR spectrum of enantiomer Delta-2 (or Lambda-2) compared to that of the racemate (rac-2) gives evidence that, in the latter form, the enantiomers are strongly associated. Moreover the X-ray structure of rac-2 was also determined and exhibits as an outstanding feature the formation of a one-dimensional supramolecular species in which the cohesion of the system is maintained by strong hydrogen bonding between carboxylic acid groups of enantiomers Delta-2 and Lambda-2 (cationic parts) with d(O...O) = 2.6 A in agreement with the infrared results. The conclusion that can be drawn from IR and X-ray spectroscopies together is that the self-association in rac-2 is strong.     

Structural Studies Reveal Enantiospecific Recognition of a DNA G‐Quadruplex by a Ruthenium Polypyridyl Complex

By using X‐ray crystallography, we show that the complexes Λ/Δ‐[Ru(TAP)₂(11‐CN‐dppz)]²⁺ (TAP=1,4,5,8‐tetraazaphenanthrene, dppz=dipyridophenazine) bind DNA G‐quadruplex in an enantiospecific manner that parallels the specificity of these complexes with duplex DNA. The Λ complex crystallises with the normally parallel stranded d(TAGGGTTA) tetraplex to give the first such antiparallel strand assembly in which syn‐guanosine is adjacent to the complex at the 5′ end of the quadruplex core. SRCD measurements confirm that the same conformational switch occurs in solution. The Δ enantiomer, by contrast, is present in the structure but stacked at the ends of the assembly. In addition, we report the structure of Λ‐[Ru(phen)₂(11‐CN‐dppz)]²⁺ bound to d(TCGGCGCCGA), a duplex‐forming sequence, and use both structural models to provide insight into the motif‐specific luminescence response of the isostructural phen analogue enantiomers.     

Luminescent Ruthenium(II) Polypyridyl Complexes as Nonviral Carriers for DNA Delivery

Two new luminescent ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes, [Ru(bpy)₂(tpt‐phen)]Cl₂ ( 1 ; bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine, tpt‐phen=triptycenyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline) and [Ru(phen)₂(tpt‐phen)]Cl₂ ( 2 ; phen=1,10‐phenanthroline), have been developed as potential nonviral vectors for DNA delivery. Photophysical and electrochemical properties of the complexes have been investigated and corroborated with electronic structure calculations. DNA condensation by these complexes has been investigated by UV/Vis and emission spectroscopy, circular dichroism spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, dynamic light scattering, confocal microscopy, and electrophoretic mobility studies. These complexes interact with DNA and efficiently condense DNA into globular nanoparticles that are taken up efficiently by HeLa cells. DNA cleavage inability and biocompatibility of complexes have been explored. Both complexes have good gene transfection abilities.     

Three Distinct Redox States of an Oxo‐Bridged Dinuclear Ruthenium Complex

A series of [{(terpy)(bpy)Ru}(μ‐O){Ru(bpy)(terpy)}]ⁿ⁺ ( [RuORu]ⁿ⁺ , terpy=2,2′;6′,2′′‐terpyridine, bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine) was systematically synthesized and characterized in three distinct redox states (n=3, 4, and 5 for Ru^II,III₂ , Ru^III,III₂ , and Ru^III,IV₂ , respectively). The crystal structures of [RuORu]ⁿ⁺ (n=3, 4, 5) in all three redox states were successfully determined. X‐ray crystallography showed that the Ru? O distances and the Ru‐O‐Ru angles are mainly regulated by the oxidation states of the ruthenium centers. X‐ray crystallography and ESR spectra clearly revealed the detailed electronic structures of two mixed‐valence complexes, [Ru^IIIORu^IV]⁵⁺ and [Ru^IIORu^III]³⁺ , in which each unpaired electron is completely delocalized across the oxo‐bridged dinuclear core. These findings allow us to understand the systematic changes in structure and electronic state that accompany the changes in the redox state.