Establishing the Coordination Chemistry of Antimony(V) Cations: Systematic Assessment of Ph4Sb(OTf) and Ph3Sb(OTf)2 as Lewis Acceptors

The coordination chemistry of the stiboranes Ph₄Sb(OTf) ( 1 a , OTf = OSO₂CF₃) and Ph₃Sb(OTf)₂ ( 3 ) with Lewis bases has been investigated. The significant steric encumbrance of the Sb center in 1 a precludes interaction with most ligands, but the relatively low steric demands of 4‐methylpyridine‐N‐oxide (OPyrMe) and OPMe₃ enabled the characterization of [Ph₄Sb(OPyrMe)][OTf] ( 2 a ) and [Ph₄Sb(OPMe₃)][OTf] ( 2 b ), rare examples of structurally characterized complexes of stibonium acceptors. In contrast, 3 was found to engage a variety of Lewis bases, forming stable isolable complexes of the form [Ph₃Sb(donor)₂][OTf]₂ [donor=OPMe₃ ( 6 a ), OPCy₃ ( 6 b , Cy=cyclohexyl), OPPh₃ ( 6 c ), OPyrMe ( 6 d )], [Ph₃Sb(dmap)₂(OTf)][OTf] ( 6 e , dmap=4‐(dimethylamino)pyridine) and [Ph₃Sb(donor)(OTf)][OTf] [donor=1,10‐phenanthroline ( 7 a ) or 2,2′‐bipy ( 7 b , bipy=bipyridine)]. These compounds exhibit significant structural diversity in the solid‐state, and undergo ligand exchange reactions in line with their assignment as coordination complexes. Compound 3 did not form stable complexes with phosphine donors, with reactions instead leading to redox processes yielding SbPh₃ and products of phosphine oxidation.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structures of t‐Butyl‐Pyridine Adducts of ZnR2 (R = Me,i‐Pr,t‐Bu,Cp*)

Lewis acid‐base adducts of the general type R₂Zn(4‐tBuPy)_x (R = Me 1 , iPr 2 , tBu 3 , Cp* 4 ; x = 1, 2) were obtained in high yields from reactions of ZnR₂ with the Lewis base 4‐tBu‐Pyridine. Compounds 1 – 4 were characterized by multinuclear NMR (¹H, ¹³C) and IR spectroscopy and elemental analyses, 1 and 4 also by X‐ray diffraction at single crystals.     

Controlled ring‐opening polymerization of l‐lactide and ε‐caprolactone catalyzed by aluminum‐based Lewis pairs or Lewis acid alone

Ring‐opening polymerization of cyclic esters was studied using catalysts composed of bulky Lewis acids (LA) and Lewis bases (LB). Controlled polymerization of l ‐lactide (l ‐Lac) was proceeded by Al(C₆F₅)₃·THF in combination with trimesitylphosphine (Mes₃P) or triphenylphosphine (Ph₃P) using BnOH as an initiator to produce poly(l ‐Lac) with narrow molecular weight distribution (MWD; M_w/M_n = 1.1). Both the LA and the LB were indispensable to promote the polymerization. The molecular weights of the resulting poly(l ‐Lac)s were controlled by the feed monomer to initiator ratio. ε‐Caprolactone (CL) was rapidly polymerized by Al(C₆F₅)₃·THF with or without Mes₃P, although the resulting polymer had rather broad MWD (M_w/M_n = 1.7). The CL polymerization by Al(C₆F₅)₃·THF alone at r.t. gave poly(CL) with relatively narrow MWD (M_w/M_n = 1.2). © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017 , 55, 297–303     

π‐Hole Bonds: Boron and Aluminum Lewis Acid Centers

MP2/aug‐cc‐pVTZ calculations were performed on complexes of boron and aluminum trihydrides and trihalides with hydrogen cyanide (ZH₃‐NCH and ZX₃‐NCH; Z=B, Al; X=F, Cl). The complexes are linked through the B???N and Al???N interactions, which are named as triel bonds and which are classified as π‐hole bonds. It was found that they possess numerous characteristics of typical covalent bonds, since they are ruled mainly by processes of the electron charge shift from the Lewis base to the Lewis acid unit. Other configurations of the ZH₃‐NCH and ZX₃‐NCH complexes linked by the dihydrogen, hydrogen, and halogen bonds were found. However, these interactions are much weaker than the corresponding π‐hole bonds. The quantum theory of atoms in molecules and the natural bond orbital approaches were applied to characterize the complexes and interactions analyzed. The crystal structures of triel trihydrides and triel trihalides were also analyzed for comparison with the results of calculations.     

Frustrated Lewis Pairs: Metal‐free Hydrogen Activation and More

Sterically encumbered Lewis acid and Lewis base combinations do not undergo the ubiquitous neutralization reaction to form “classical” Lewis acid/Lewis base adducts. Rather, both the unquenched Lewis acidity and basicity of such sterically “frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs)” is available to carry out unusual reactions. Typical examples of frustrated Lewis pairs are inter‐ or intramolecular combinations of bulky phosphines or amines with strongly electrophilic RB(C₆F₅)₂ components. Many examples of such frustrated Lewis pairs are able to cleave dihydrogen heterolytically. The resulting H⁺/H^? pairs (stabilized for example, in the form of the respective phosphonium cation/hydridoborate anion salts) serve as active metal‐free catalysts for the hydrogenation of, for example, bulky imines, enamines, or enol ethers. Frustrated Lewis pairs also react with alkenes, aldehydes, and a variety of other small molecules, including carbon dioxide, in cooperative three‐component reactions, offering new strategies for synthetic chemistry.