Encapsulation of Triphenylene Derivatives in the Hexanuclear Arene Ruthenium Metallo‐Prismatic Cage [Ru6(p‐PriC6H4Me)6(tpt)2(dhbq)3]6+ (tpt = 2,4,6‐tri(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3,5‐triazine,dhbq = 2,5‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐benzoquinonato)

A large cationic triangular metallo‐prism, [Ru₆(p‐PrⁱC₆H₄Me)₆(tpt)₂(dhbq)₃]⁶⁺ ( 1 )⁶⁺, incorporating p‐cymene ruthenium building blocks, bridged by 2,5‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐benzoquinonato (dhbq) ligands, and connected by two 2,4,6‐tri(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3,5‐triazine (tpt) subunits, allows the permanent encapsulation of the triphenylene derivatives hexahydroxytriphenylene, C₁₈H₆(OH)₆ and hexamethoxytriphenylene, C₁₈H₆(OMe)₆. These two cationic carceplex systems [C₁₈H₆(OH)₆⊂ 1 ]⁶⁺ and [C₁₈H₆(OMe)₆⊂ 1 ]⁶⁺ have been isolated as their triflate salts. The molecular structure of these systems has been established by one‐dimensional ¹H ROESY NMR experiments as well as by the single‐crystal structure analysis of [C₁₈H₆(OMe)₆⊂ 1 ][O₃SCF₃]₆.     

“Helix‐in‐Helix” Superstructure Formation through Encapsulation of Fullerene‐Bound Helical Peptides within a Helical Poly(methyl methacrylate) Cavity

A one‐handed 3₁₀‐helical hexapeptide is efficiently encapsulated within the helical cavity of st‐PMMA when a fullerene (C₆₀) derivative is introduced at the C‐terminal end of the peptide. The encapsulation is accompanied by induction of a preferred‐handed helical conformation in the st‐PMMA backbone with the same‐handedness as that of the hexapeptide to form a crystalline st‐PMMA/peptide‐C₆₀ inclusion complex with a unique optically active helix‐in‐helix structure. Although the st‐PMMA is unable to encapsulate the 3₁₀‐helical peptide without the terminal C₆₀ unit, the helical hollow space of the st‐PMMA is almost filled by the C₆₀‐bound peptides. This result suggests that the C₆₀ moiety can serve as a versatile molecular carrier of specific molecules and polymers in the helical cavity of the st‐PMMA for the formation of an inclusion complex, thus producing unique supramolecular soft materials that cannot be prepared by other methods.     

Synthese und Struktur der Komplexe [(Me2PhP)3Cl2Re≡N‐RuCl2(C6H6)] und [(Me2PhP)3Cl2Re≡N‐RhCl(COD)]

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of the Complexes [(Me₂PhP)₃Cl₂Re≡N‐RuCl₂(C₆H₆)] and [(Me₂PhP)₃Cl₂Re≡N‐RhCl(COD)] The heteronuclear complex [(Me₂PhP)₃Cl₂Re≡N‐RuCl₂(C₆H₆)] ( 1 ) is obtained by the reaction of [ReNCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₃] with [RuCl₂(C₆H₆)]₂ in C₆H₅CN in form of red crystals with the composition 1 ·C₆H₅CN crystallizing in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a =1149.77(8), b = 3085.9(3), c = 1172.1(1) pm, β = 104.766(9)° and Z = 4. In the dinuclear complex the complex fragment [RuCl₂(C₆H₆)] is connected by an asymmetric nitrido bridge with the nitrido complex [ReNCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₃]. The nitrido bridge is characterised by a bond angle Re‐N‐Ru of 170.6(3)° and distances Re‐N = 170.2(5) and Ru‐N = 199.0(5) pm. The reaction of [ReNCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₃] with [RhCl(COD)]₂ in benzonitrile yields orange crystals of [(Me₂PhP)₃Cl₂Re≡N‐RhCl(COD)] ( 2 ) with the space group P2₁/c and a = 1522.3(2), b = 1274.85(4), c = 1921.2(2) pm, β = 106.759(7)° and Z = 4. The monovalent Rh atom exhibits a square planar coordination with the two π‐bonds of the cycloocta‐1, 5‐diene occupying cis positions. The distances in the almost linear nitrido bridge (Re‐N‐Rh = 174.8(4)°>) are Re‐N = 172.2(6) pm and Rh‐N = 195.6(6) pm.     

The Structure of the “Third‐Generation” Tris(pyrazolyl)borate Caesium Salt p‐BrC6H4TpCs

Slow crystallisation at lowered temperature yielded crystals of the “third‐generation” tris(pyrazolyl)borate transfer agent p‐BrC₆H₄TpCs (Tp′Cs) 1 (triclinic; P$\bar{1}$ ; a = 8.540(4), b = 15.045(6), c = 15.879(7) Å; α = 65.853(8), β = 88.457(8), γ = 75.056(8)°; V = 1791.4(13) Å³; Z = 4). The central caesium ion in 1 interacts with three individual p‐BrC₆H₄Tp ligands in two different chelating fashions.In particular, κ¹‐N‐coordination and η⁵‐π‐coordination of pyrazole moieties as well as η⁶‐π‐coordination of the p‐BrC₆H₄ substituent are observed. Further, comparable coordination of neighbouring caesium ions leads to the formation of polymeric structures connected by two bridging modes.