Subduction coefficients for 〈2N/2–S, 12S〉 ↓ 〈2, 1〉 ⊗ 〈2, 1〉 of U(n) ↓ U(n1) ⊗ U(n2)

The determination of the subduction coefficients for states of the unitary group U(n) under the restrictions U(n) ↓ U(n₁) ? U(n₂) have been considered for the spin free states of many electron systems. Using the transformation properties of the tensor basis spanning the irreducible representation 〈2^N/2–S, 1^2S〉 of U(n) under the permutations of electron coordinates, a simple programmable procedure has been developed for the determination of these coefficients. The procedure has been illustrated using a simple example.     

Nucleoside und Nucleotide. Teil 16. Verhalten von 1-(2′-Desoxy-β-D-ribofuranosyl)-2(1 H)-pyrimidinon-5′-triphosphat, 1-(2′-Desoxy-β-D-ribofuranosyl)-2(1 H)pyridinon-5′-triphosphat und 4-Amino-1-(2′-Desoxy-β-D-ribofuranosyl)-2(1 H)-pyridinon-5′-triphosphat gegenüber DNA-Polymerase

Nucleosides and Nucleotides. Part 16. The Behaviour of 1-(2′-Deoxy-β-D -ribofuranosyl)-2(1H)-pyrimidinone-5′-triphosphate, 1-(2′-Deoxy-β-D -ribofuranosyl-2(1H))-pyridinone-5′-triphosphate and 4-Amino-1-(2′-desoxy-β-D -ribofuranosyl)-2(1H)-pyridinone-5′-triphosphate towards DNA Polymerase The behaviour of nucleotide base analogs in the DNA synthesis in vitro was studied. The investigated nucleoside-5′-triphosphates 1-(2′-deoxy-β-D -ribofuranosyl)-2(1 H)-pyrimidinone-5′-triphosphate (pppM_d), 1-(2′-deoxy-β-D -ribofuranosyl)-2(1 H)-pyridinone-5′-triphosphate (pppII_d) and 4-amino-1-(2′-deoxy-β-D -ribofuranosyl)-2(1 H)-pyridinone-5′-triphosphate (pppZ_d) can be considered to be analogs of 2′-deoxy-cytidine-5′-triphosphate. However, their ability to undergo base pairing to the complementary guanine is decreased. When pppM_d, pppII_d or pppZ_d are substituted for pppC_d in the enzymatic synthesis of DNA by DNA polymerase no incorporation of these analogs is observed. They exhibit only a weak inhibition of the DNA synthesis. The mode of the inhibition is uncompetitive which shows that these nucleotide analogs cannot serve as substrates for the DNA polymerase.     

(1R,2R)‐2‐(4‐Methylenecyclohex‐2‐enyl)propyl (1R,4S)‐camphanate

Esterification of a single diastereomer of 2‐(4‐methylene­cyclohex‐2‐enyl)propanol, (II), with (1R,4S)‐(+)‐camphanic acid [(1R,4S)‐4,7,7‐trimethyl‐3‐oxo‐2‐oxabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane‐1‐carboxylic acid] leads to the crystalline title compound, C₂₀H₂₈O₄. The relative configuration of the camphanate was determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis. The outcome clarifies the relative and absolute stereochemistry of the naturally occurring bisabolane sesquiterpenes β‐turmerone and β‐sesquiphellandrene, since we have converted (II) into both natural products via a stereospecific route.     

(2S)‐1‐Carbamoylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxylic acid

In the title compound, also known as N‐carbamoyl‐l ‐proline, C₆H₁₀N₂O₃, the pyrrolidine ring adopts a half‐chair conformation, whereas the carboxyl group and the mean plane of the ureide group form an angle of 80.1 (2)°. Molecules are joined by N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds into cyclic structures with graph‐set R²₂(8), forming chains in the b‐axis direction that are further connected via N—H...O hydrogen bonds into a three‐dimensional network.     

2‐Aminopyrimidine–3,3,3‐triphenylpropanoic acid (1/1)

The title bimolecular compound, C₄H₅N₃·C₂₁H₁₈O₂, constructed from 2‐aminopyrimidine and 3,3,3‐triphenylpropanoic acid, forms a tetramolecular hydrogen‐bonded motif via O—H...N, N—H...O and N—H...N contacts. This aggregate organizes to give crystal‐packing motifs with hydrophilic and hydrophobic regions.     

Synthesis and characterization of (cryptand‐222)potassium (2‐methylimidazolato)(meso‐tetraphenylporphinato)ferrate(II)–2‐methylimidazole–tetrahydrofuran (1/1/2)

Metalloporphyrin complexes containing an additional imidazole ligand can provide information about the effect of deprotonation or hydrogen bonding on the axial histidine unit in heme proteins. The title high‐spin five‐coordinate imidazolate‐ligated iron(II) porphyrinate, [K(C₁₈H₃₆N₂O₆)][Fe(C₄H₅N₂)(C₄₄H₂₈N₄)]·C₄H₆N₂·2C₄H₈O, has been synthesized and investigated. The solvated salt crystallizes with one 2‐methylimidazole molecule, two tetrahydrofuran solvent molecules and a potassium cation chelated inside a cryptand‐222 (4,7,13,16,21,24‐hexaoxa‐1,10‐diazabicyclo[8.8.8]hexacosane) molecule. The imidazolate ligand is ordered. The average Fe—Np (Np is a porphyrin N atom) bond length is 2.113 (11) Å and the axial Fe—N_Im (N_Im is an imidazolate N atom) is 2.0739 (13) Å. The out‐of‐plane displacement of the Fe^II atom from the 24‐atom mean plane is 0.6098 (5) Å, indicating an apparent doming of the porphyrin core.     

(E)‐2‐(2‐Adamantylidene)‐3‐(1‐ferrocenylethylidene)succinic anhydride

The title compound, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₂₁H₂₁O₃)], was obtained from successive Stobbe condensations between ketones and di­methyl succinate. The succinic anhydride five‐membered ring is distorted significantly from planarity, with the buta­diene moiety being twisted by 49.3 (2)° from planarity and the C atoms at the succinic anhydride end of the alkene bonds showing significant pyramidalization. The cyclo­penta­diene rings of the ferrocenyl moiety adopt an almost eclipsed conformation.     

Calculation of SN 1 + N 2 ⊃ SN1 ⊗ sn 2 and U(n1 + n2) ⊃ u (n1) ⊗ u (n2) subduction coefficients by using spin graph

By use of the graphical method of spin algebra, simple, and closed expressions for S_N1+_N2 ? S_N1 ? S_N2 and U(n₁ + n₂) ? U(n₁) ? U(n₂), subduction coefficients are derived.     

µ2‐Diiodotetrakis(2‐hydroxymethyl‐1‐methyl‐1‐imidazole‐N3)dicadmium(II) bis[triiodo(2‐hydroxymethyl‐1‐methyl‐1‐imidazole‐N3)cadmate(II)] dihydrate

There are two types of Cd in the title compound, the six‐coordinated Cd atom in the cation is in a distorted octahedral geometry while the four‐coordinated Cd in the anion shows a distorted tetrahedral geometry. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Aqua­bis(3‐meth­oxy‐2‐pyridonato)­(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine)ruthenium(II)–acetonitrile–water (1/1/1)

The title compound, [Ru(C₆H₆NO₂)₂(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)(H₂O)]·CH₃CN·H₂O, is a transfer hydrogenation catalyst supported by nitro­gen‐donor ligands. This octa­hedral Ru^II complex features rare monodentate coordination of 3‐meth­oxy‐2‐pyridonate ligands and inter­ligand S(6)S(6) hydrogen bonding. Comparison of the title complex with a structural analog with unsubstituted 2‐pyridonate ligands reveals subtle differences in the orientation of the ligand planes.     

Regioselective ortho‐Metallation of 2‐Diphenylphosphanylpyridine and (2‐(2‐Diphenylphosphanyl)phenyl)‐1‐3‐dioxalane with Methyltetrakis(trimethylphosphane)cobalt(I)

Co(CH₃)(PMe₃)₄ forms 100 % regioselectively with (2‐(2‐diphenylphosphanyl)phenyl)‐1,3‐dioxalane and 2‐diphenylphosphanyl‐pyridine, by elimination of methane, the four‐membered metallacycles Co{(C₃O₂HC₆H₃)P(C₆H₅)₂}(PMe₃)₃ ( 1 ) and Co{(CNC₄H₃)P(C₆H₅)₂}(PMe₃)₃ ( 4 ). The regioselectivity is independent of the steric requirement of the ortho substituent in the 2‐diphenylphosphanylaryl‐ligands. Oxidative addition with iodomethane transforms 1 and 4 into octahedral, diamagnetic low‐spin d⁶ complexes Co(CH₃)I‐{(C₃O₂HC₆H₃)P(C₆H₅)₂}(PMe₃)₂ ( 2 ) and Co(CH₃)I‐{(CNC₄H₃)P(C₆H₅)₂}(PMe₃)₂ ( 5 ). Under an atmosphere of carbon monoxide, insertion into the Co‐C bond results in ring expansion by forming the new assembled phosphanylbenzoyl complexes Co{(C₄O₃HC₆H₃)‐P(C₆H₅)₂}CO(PMe₃)₂ ( 3 ) and Co{(OCNC₄H₃)P(C₆H₅)₂}CO(PMe₃)₂ ( 6 ). The three different types of cobaltacycles are supported by X‐ray diffraction of 1 , 3 , 5 and 6 .     

A New Germanium Complex Containing Chelating Pyridinecarboxylate Ligands: cis‐Dihydroxybis(pyridine‐2‐carboxylato‐κN1,κO2)germanium Hydrate (1 : 2) (cis‐[Ge(pyca)2(OH)2]⋅2 H2O)

A new germanium complex, cis‐[Ge(pyca)₂(OH)₂]?2 H₂O ( 1 ; pyca=pyridine‐2‐carboxylato), was synthesized by the reaction of [Ge(acac)₂Cl₂] (acac=acetylacetonato=pentane‐2,4‐dionato) with potassium pyridine‐2‐carboxylate (Kpyca) in H₂O/THF. According to the single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis, each Ge‐atom of 1 is coordinated by two pyca ligands and two OH^? groups (Fig. 1). These molecules are bonded to each other via a system of H‐bonds resulting in a sheet‐like structure (Fig. 2). The complex is decomposed during heating with stepwise mass loss and formation of GeO₂ as final product (Fig. 3).