Solvent‐Induced Cluster‐to‐Cluster Transformation of Homoleptic Gold(I) Thiolates between Catenane and Ring‐in‐Ring Structures

Supramolecular ensembles adopting ring‐in‐ring structures are less developed compared with catenanes featuring interlocked rings. While catenanes with inter‐ring closed‐shell metallophilic interactions, such as d¹⁰–d¹⁰ Au^I–Au^I interactions, have been well‐documented, the ring‐in‐ring complexes featuring such metallophilic interactions remain underdeveloped. Herein is described an unprecedented ring‐in‐ring structure of a Au^I‐thiolate Au₁₂ cluster formed by recrystallization of a Au^I‐thiolate Au₁₀ [2]catenane from alkane solvents such as hexane, with use of a bulky dibutylfluorene‐2‐thiolate ligand. The ring‐in‐ring Au^I‐thiolate Au₁₂ cluster features inter‐ring Au^I–Au^I interactions and underwent cluster core change to form the thermodynamically more stable Au₁₀ [2]catenane structure upon dissolving in, or recrystallization from, other solvents such as CH₂Cl₂, CHCl₃, and CH₂Cl₂/MeCN. The cluster‐to‐cluster transformation process was monitored by ¹H NMR and ESI‐MS measurements. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed to provide insight into the mechanism of the “ring‐in‐ring? [2]catenane” interconversions.     

Palladium‐Templated Subcomponent Self‐Assembly of Macrocycles,Catenanes, and Rotaxanes

The reaction of 2,6‐diformylpyridine with diverse amines and Pd^II ions gave rise to a variety of metallosupramolecular species, in which the Pd^II ion is observed to template a tridentate bis(imino)pyridine ligand. These species included a mononuclear complex as well as [2+2] and [3+3] macrocycles. The addition of pyridine‐containing macrocyclic capping ligands allows for topological complexity to arise, thereby enabling the straightforward preparation of structures that include a [2]catenane, a [2]rotaxane, and a doubly threaded [3]rotaxane.     

Formation of a Pillar[5]arene‐Based Two‐Dimensional Poly‐Pseudo‐Rotaxane: Threading and Crosslinking by the Same Guest Molecules

A one‐pot reaction of the A1/A2‐thiopyridyl pillar[5]arene L with silver(I) trifluoroacetate in the presence of the linear dinitrile guest C8 , [CN(CH₂)_nCN, n=8], afforded the first example of a two‐dimensional (2D) poly‐pseudo‐rotaxane {[(μ₄‐Ag)₂( C8 @ L )₂(μ ‐C8 )](CF₃CO₂)₂}_n. Surprisingly, in this structure the C8 guest not only threads into the pillar[5]arene unit but also crosslinks the 1D coordinative polymeric arrays. The formation of the 2D poly‐pseudo‐rotaxane is driven by an adaptive rearrangement of the components that minimizes the steric clashes not only between the threaded guests but also between the threaded and crosslinked guests where crosslinking occurs. A pathway for the formation of the 2D poly‐pseudo‐rotaxane is proposed.