Quantitative bioanalysis of quinine by atmospheric pressure-matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry combined with dynamic drop-to-drop solvent microextraction

Dynamic drop-to-drop solvent microextraction (DDSME) combined with atmospheric pressure-matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (AP-MALDI/MS) has been successfully applied on the bioanalysis of quinine using micro liter volume (30 μL) of human urine and plasma samples. The method is based on the movement of aqueous phase (AP) in and out of the microsyringe, which increases the transfer and diffusion rate of the quinine drug from aqueous phase to organic phase (OP). The optimization parameters including the effect of solvent selection, number of samplings, sampling volume, volume of aqueous phase, volume of organic phase, addition of salt and pH were investigated for obtaining higher extraction efficiency of the analyte. The limits of detections (LODs) of quinine, using the dynamic DDSME/AP-MALDI/MS in urine and plasma samples were 0.18 and 0.24 μM, respectively. The superiority of dynamic DDSME over static DDSME and liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) was also demonstrated for the determination of quinine in aqueous solution. This method is promising in clinical application and pharmacokinetic studies, in which the availability of sample amount is extremely small.     

Quantitative determination of nicotinic acid in micro liter volume of urine sample by drop-to-drop solvent microextraction coupled to matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry

Drop-to-drop solvent microextraction (DDSME) coupled with matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) for quantitative determination of nicotinic acid in one drop of urine sample has been proposed. All parameters, such as type of organic solvent, extraction time, exposure volume solvent, pH of the sample solution that affecting the separation and preconcentration of nicotinic acid were investigated. Under the optimal conditions, the detection limit of the method was 20 ng mL(-1) and the relative standard deviations (RSD) for determination of the nicotinic acid were in the range of 8.0-12.5%. The calculated calibration curves gave linearity in the range of 80-1000 ng mL(-1). The main advantages of the proposed method are simple, fast, and small amount of sample solution is used for separation and preconcentration of nicotinic acid. This method could be also useful for the analysis of other interested analytes in small volume of biological samples, like plasma, saliva and urine, where the availability of samples are limited.     

Determination of ligustilide in rat blood and tissues by capillary gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

A gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) method was developed to study the pharmacokinetics of ligustilide following oral administration to rats. The method was used for the analysis of samples taken from rats. Biological samples were prepared by liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) using an n-hexane-ether (2:1) solvent mixture for a sample clean-up step and analyzed by GC/MS with a quadrupole MS detector in selected ion monitoring mode (m/z 190). The calibration curves were linear over the concentration range 0.172-8.60 microg/mL (r > 0.99) for blood samples and a different range (r > 0.99) for different tissue samples. The limit of detection (LOD) was 1.0 ng/mL or 1.0 ng/g (three times the signal-noise ratio). Within- and between-day precision expressed as the relative standard deviation (RSD) for the method was 1.58-3.88 and 2.99-4.91%, respectively. The recovery for all samples was >80%, except for liver samples (>70%). The main pharmacokinetic parameters obtained were: T(max) = 0.65 +/- 0.07 h, C(max) = 1.5 +/- 0.2 microg/mL, AUC = 34 +/- 6 h microg/mL and K(a) = 3.5 +/- 0.6/h. The experimental results showed that ligustilide was easily absorbed, but its elimination was slow, from 3 to 12 h after oral administration. The concentrations of ligustilide in rat cerebellum, cerebrum, spleen and kidney were higher than those in other organs.     

Analysis of organochlorine pesticides in wine by solvent bar microextraction coupled with gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection

A solvent bar microextraction (SBME) technique combined with gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (GC/MS/MS), for the determination of selected organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in wine samples, is described. In this work the OCPs were extracted and dissolved in a 2-microL aliquot of organic extraction solvent (n-tetradecane) confined within a 1.7-cm length of hollow fiber. Both ends of the hollow fiber (solvent bar) were sealed, and it was placed in an aqueous sample solution for extraction. The effects of solvent selection, sample agitation, extraction time, extraction temperature, and salt concentration on the SBME performance were optimized. The influence of aqueous sample/organic solvent phase ratio was further investigated in detail. High enrichments (1900-7100-fold) could be obtained at an aqueous sample/organic solvent volume ratio of 20 mL/2 microL in this study. Good extraction reproducibility was obtained with relative standard deviation (RSD) values below 12.6%. Comparisons of sensitivity and precision between SBME and dynamic hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction were also investigated.     

Determination of aromatic amines from textiles using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction

A dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction procedure coupled with GC‐MS is described for preconcentration and determination of banned aromatic amines from textile samples. Experimental conditions affecting the microextraction procedure were optimized. A mixture of 30 μL chlorobenzene (extraction solvent) and 800 μL ACN (disperser solvent), 5 min extraction time, and 5 mL aqueous sample volume were chosen for the best extraction efficiency by the proposed procedure. Satisfactory linearity (with correlation coefficients >0.9962) and repeatability (<9.78%) were obtained for all 20 aromatic amines; detection limits attained were much lower than the standardized liquid–liquid method. The proposed method has advantages of being quicker and easier to operate, and lower consumption of organic solvent.     

Determination of some organophosphorus and azole group pesticides in water samples by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction coupled with GC/MS

A dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) procedure coupled with GC/MS detection is described for preconcentration and determination of some organophosphorus and azole group pesticides from water samples. Experimental conditions affecting the DLLME procedure were optimized by means of an experimental design. A mixture of 60 microL chlorobenzene (extraction solvent) and 750 microL acetonitrile (disperser solvent), 3.5 min extraction time, and 7.5 mL aqueous sample volume were chosen for the best recovery by DLLME. The linear range was 1.6-32 microg/L. The LOD ranged from 48.8 to 68.7 ng/L. The RSD values for organophosphorus and azole group pesticides at spiking levels of 3, 6, and 9 microg/L in water samples were in the range of 1.1-12.8%. The applicability and accuracy of the developed method were determined by analysis of spiked water samples, and the recoveries of the analyzed pesticides from artesian, stream, and tap waters at spiking levels of 3, 6, and 9 microg/L were 89.3-105.6, 89.5-103.0, and 92.0-111.3%, respectively.     

Dynamic liquid phase nanoextraction coupled to GC/MS for rapid analysis of methoxyacetophenone and anisaldehyde isomers in urine

This study introduces a novel extraction technique in the nanoscale and challenges the limits of solvent extraction in the GC/MS using electronic ionization (EI) method for quantitative determination of six methoxyacetophenone (MAP) and anisaldehye (AAH) isomers in one drop of water and urine. This technique is termed as dynamic liquid phase nanoextraction (DLPNE). The optimum parameters for the DLPNE technique were: selection of solvent, toluene; sampling volume, 0.44 microL; dwell time, 2 s; number of sampling, 15; extraction time, 1.5 min; volume of extraction solvent, 60 nL; and no salt addition. The LODs for this technique were 5-20 ng/mL. The RSDs were in the range of 9.7-12.6% (n = 6). The linear dynamic range of the calibration curve of DLPNE is from 0.02 to 0.5 microg/mL with correlation coefficient (r(2)) >0.9705. The advantages of the DLPNE technique are rapidity, ease of operation, simple device, and extremely little solvent and sample consumption. This technique was also compared with the static liquid phase nanoextraction (SLPNE) while the SLPNE failed to detect any signal for the six isomers. We believe that this technique can be very useful for the detection of volatile organic compounds in environmental science from microscale of water or it can be applied to clinical or pharmaceutical application such as diagnosis of microamount of urine or blood samples by GC/MS.     

Single-drop microextraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometric determination of anisaldehyde isomers in human urine and blood serum

The application of single-drop microextraction (SDME) followed by gas chromatography/chemical ionization mass spectrometry (GC/CI-MS) was investigated for the determination of anisaldehyde isomers in human urine and blood serum. The effects of extraction solvent, sample agitation rate, salt addition, sampling time and temperature on the extraction efficiency were examined and optimized. Analytical parameters such as linearity, reproducibility, detection limit and relative recovery were evaluated under the optimized experimental conditions. Good reproducibilities of replicate extractions (n = 5) were obtained, with relative standard deviation (RSD) values below 6%. The limits of detection (LOD) using an extraction time of 5 min were found to be in the range 2-5 ng/mL under the selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode of GC/MS. Recoveries of 82-98% were achieved after 5 min extraction.     

Development and evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method for the measurement of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in human urine

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method was developed to quantitatively measure 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in human urine. Samples were diluted (1:5) with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween and 0.02% sodium azide, with analysis by a 96-microwell plate immunoassay format. No clean up was required as dilution step minimized sample interferences. Fifty urine samples were received without identifiers from a subset of pesticide applicators and their spouses in an EPA pesticide exposure study (PES) and analyzed by the ELISA method and a conventional gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) procedure. For the GC/MS analysis, urine samples were extracted with acidic dichloromethane (DCM); methylated by diazomethane and fractionated by a Florisil solid phase extraction (SPE) column prior to GC/MS detection. The percent relative standard deviation (%R.S.D.) of the 96-microwell plate triplicate assays ranged from 1.2 to 22% for the urine samples. Day-to-day variation of the assay results was within ±20%. Quantitative recoveries (>70%) of 2,4-D were obtained for the spiked urine samples by the ELISA method. Quantitative recoveries (>80%) of 2,4-D were also obtained for these samples by the GC/MS procedure. The overall method precision of these samples was within ±20% for both the ELISA and GC/MS methods. The estimated quantification limit for 2,4-D in urine was 30 ng/mL by ELISA and 0.2 ng/mL by GC/MS. A higher quantification limit for the ELISA method is partly due to the requirement of a 1:5 dilution to remove the urine sample matrix effect. The GC/MS method can accommodate a 10:1 concentration factor (10 mL of urine converted into 1 mL organic solvent for analysis) but requires extraction, methylation and clean up on a solid phase column. The immunoassay and GC/MS data were highly correlated, with a correlation coefficient of 0.94 and a slope of 1.00. Favorable results between the two methods were achieved despite the vast differences in sample preparation. Results indicated that the ELISA method could be used as a high throughput, quantitative monitoring tool for human urine samples to identify individuals with exposure to 2,4-D above the typical background levels.     

Rapid determination of acetone in human blood by derivatization with pentafluorobenzyl hydroxylamine followed by headspace liquid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

In the current work, a simple, rapid, accurate and inexpensive method was developed for the determination of acetone in human blood. The proposed method is based on derivatization with O-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyl)hydroxylamine hydrochloride (PFBHA), followed by headspace liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME) and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). In the present method, acetone in blood samples was derivatized with PFBHA and acetone oxime formed in several seconds. The formed oxime was enriched by HS-LPME using the organic solvent film (OSF) formed in a microsyringe barrel as extraction interface. Finally, the enriched oxime was analyzed by GC/MS in electron ionization (EI) mode. HS-LPME parameters including solvent, syringe plunger withdrawal rate, sampling volume, and extraction cycle were optimized and the method reproducibility, linearity, recovery and detection limit were studied. The proposed method was applied to determination of acetone in diabetes blood and normal blood. It has been shown that derivatization with HS-LPME and GC/MS is an alternative method for determination of the diabetes biomarker, acetone, in blood samples.     

Liquid-phase microextraction for sample preparation in analysis of unconjugated anabolic steroids in urine

The applicability of in-vial two-phase liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) in porous hollow polypropylene fiber was studied for the sample preparation of unconjugated anabolic steroids in urine. Four different anabolic steroids - metabolites of fluoxymesterone, 4-chlorodehydromethyltestosterone, stanozolol and danazol - were used as test compounds and methyltestosterone as an internal standard. A standard two-phase LPME method for use with liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) was set up and the influence of different parameters, including the nature of organic solvent, extraction time, salting-out and temperature, on the LPME process was investigated. Taking advantage of the preliminary studies, a novel two-phase LPME method utilizing simultaneous in-fiber silylation was developed and validated for gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric (GC/MS) analysis of a danazol metabolite in urine. In all, LPME allowed a very straightforward, simple and selective way to prepare urine samples for steroid analysis, being most suitable for hydrophobic steroids. The LPME method with in-fiber derivatization for GC/MS analysis exhibited high sensitivity, repeatability and linearity and enabled simultaneous filtration, extraction, enrichment and derivatization of the analyte from urine matrix without any other steps in sample pretreatment.     

Revolving hollow fiber–liquid phase microextraction coupled to GC/MS using electron ionization for quantification of five aromatic hydrocarbon isomers

A dynamic liquid phase microextraction method using a revolving hollow fiber was demonstrated for coupling to GC/MS [using EI (electronic ionization) and selected ion monitor (SIM)] as a concentrating probe for rapid analysis and quantitative determination of five aromatic hydrocarbon isomers (cumene; propylbenzene; 2‐ethyltoluene; 1,2,3‐trimethylbenzene; and 1,2,4‐trimethylbenzene) from biological matrices (human urine and human plasma). This technique was named as revolving hollow fiber–liquid phase microextraction (RHF–LPME). The optimized parameters of RHF–LPME coupled to GC/MS experiments were extraction solvent, toluene; extraction time, 2 min; sample agitation rate, 700 rpm; salt concentration, 0%; rotating speed for motor driving rotator, 250 rpm; and the rotator was operated in a reversed direction with the stirrer. The linear range of calibration curve of RHF–LPME was from 0.002 to 0.4 μg/mL with R² > 0.9916 and the RSD values were from 4.5 to 5.2%. Additionally, comparing to single drop microextraction (SDME), this method offers better limits of detection (LODs) and EF (enrichment factor). This approach exhibits many advantages including simplicity, rapid detection with high reproducibility and high extraction efficiency, easy to operate and fast to reach equilibrium for analyzing biological samples. This approach has the potential to be widely used because it only requires simple devices to perform all extraction processes. We believe that this technique can be a powerful tool for GC/MS analysis of biological samples and clinical applications in the near future.     

超声辅助乳化液液微萃取-气相色谱-质谱分析水中的人工合成麝香

将超声辅助乳化与液液微萃取技术结合,建立了水体中人工合成麝香的气相色谱-质谱分析方法.优化前处理条件,包括萃取剂、萃取剂体积、萃取时间、萃取温度及离子强度的选择.结果表明:在10 mL水样中,加入50 μL氯苯作为萃取剂,4 0 MHz超声10 min,混匀,以4000 r/min离心10 min,移取下层有机相进样分析,效果佳.样品的富集倍数可达200倍,8种人工合成麝香在0.005～0.4 μg/L范围内线性关系良好,相关系数均大于0.994;检出限为0.3～0.5 ng/L;水样中加标回收率为96.2％～102.9％;相对标准偏差为2.3％～4.1％.本方法灵敏、快速、准确,可满足环境水样中痕量人工合成麝香监测的质控要求.     

Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with solidification of floating organic drop combined with high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of phenolic oestrogens from human urine and water samples

A novel, simple and rapid method, termed dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with solidification of floating organic drop coupled to high performance liquid chromatography, was developed for analysis of three phenolic oestrogens including diethylstilbestrol, dienestrol and hexestrol in human urine and water samples. The parameters of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with solidification of floating organic drop procedure including sample pH, type and volume of disperser solvent, and type and volume of extraction solvent were optimised. High performance liquid chromatography was applied for the phenolic oestrogens’ analysis. Under the optimum extraction and detection conditions, excellent analytical performances were attained. Good linear relationships (r ≥ 0.998) between peak area and concentration for diethylstilbestrol and dienestrol were optimised from 0.1 to 20 µg/mL, for hexestrol from 2 to 50 µg/mL. Method detection limits of 28.6–666.7 ng/mL were achieved. Satisfactory relative recoveries ranging from 72% to 122% were determined for urine, lake and tap water samples, with relative standard deviations (RSDs, n = 6) of 1.5–9.8%. The developed dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with solidification of floating organic drop-high performance liquid chromatography method has a great potential in routine residual analysis of trace phenolic oestrogens in biological and water samples.     

Use of volatile organic solvents in headspace liquid‐phase microextraction by direct cooling of the organic drop using a simple cooling capsule

A low‐cost and simple cooling‐assisted headspace liquid‐phase microextraction device for the extraction and determination of 2,6,6‐trimethyl‐1,3 cyclohexadiene‐1‐carboxaldehyde (safranal) in Saffron samples, using volatile organic solvents, was fabricated and evaluated. The main part of the cooling‐assisted headspace liquid‐phase microextraction system was a cooling capsule, with a Teflon microcup to hold the extracting organic solvent, which is able to directly cool down the extraction phase while the sample matrix is simultaneously heated. Different experimental factors such as type of organic extraction solvent, sample temperature, extraction solvent temperature, and extraction time were optimized. The optimal conditions were obtained as: extraction solvent, methanol (10 μL); extraction temperature, 60°C; extraction solvent temperature, 0°C; and extraction time, 20 min. Good linearity of the calibration curve (R² = 0.995) was obtained in the concentration range of 0.01–50.0 μg/mL. The limit of detection was 0.001 μg/mL. The relative standard deviation for 1.0 μg/mL of safranal was 10.7% (n = 6). The proposed cooling‐assisted headspace liquid‐phase microextraction device was coupled (off‐line) to high‐performance liquid chromatography and used for the determination of safranal in Saffron samples. Reasonable agreement was observed between the results of the cooling‐assisted headspace liquid‐phase microextraction high‐performance liquid chromatography method and those obtained by a validated ultrasound‐assisted solvent extraction procedure.     

Preconcentration and determination of 2‐mercaptobenzimidazole by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and experimental design

A method was developed to determine 2‐mercaptobenzimidazole in water and urine samples using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction technique coupled with ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometry. It was essential to peruse the effect of all parameters that can likely influence the performance of extraction. The influence of parameters, such as dispersive and extraction solvent volume and sample volume, on dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction was studied. The optimization was carried out by the central composite design method. The central composite design optimization method resulted in 1.10 mL dispersive solvent, 138.46 μL extraction solvent, and 4.46 mL sample volume. Under the optimal terms, the calibration curve was linear over the range of 0.003–0.18 and 0.007–0.18 μg/mL in water and urine samples, respectively. The limit of detection and quantification of the proposed approach for 2‐mercaptobenzimidazole were 0.013 and 0.044 μg/mL in water samples and 0.016 and 0.052 μg/mL in urine samples, respectively. The method was successfully applied to determination of 2‐mercaptobenzimidazole in urine and water samples.     

Differentiation and quantification of xylene isomers by combining headspace solid-phase microextraction/gas chromatography and self-ion molecule reaction in an ion trap tandem mass spectrometry

A headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) method using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-coated fiber coupling with GC/self-ion molecule reaction (SIMR)/MS/MS (GC/SIMR/MS/MS) has been developed for the differentiation of o-, m-, and p-xylene isomers. The optimization parameters of this method are: extraction time 20 min, stirring rate 1200 rpm, sampling temperature 28 degrees C, and salt concentration 5%. The LODs were found to be in the range of 3-9 ng/mL under the SIM mode of GC/MS. The RSDs were below 1% (n=5). The linear dynamic range of the calibration curve was from 0.05 to 10.0 microg/mL with correlation coefficient (r2)>0.9089. The advantages of this technique are sensitive, selective, ease of operation, simple device, solvent free, and extremely little sample consumption. This technique is the first example using SIMR combined MS/MS applied in the GC/MS and it can be applied to other volatile compounds for future application.     

Determination of triazines in soil by microwave-assisted extraction followed by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

A method for determining triazine herbicides in soil samples that combines microwave-assisted extraction with solid-phase microextraction is described. Water containing 1% methanol was employed as extractant. The parameters of solid-phase microextraction and microwave-assisted extraction were investigated. In solid-phase microextraction, particular attention was paid to the negative effect of salt on fiber stability. Our experiments showed that this effect could be effectively reduced by simply washing the fiber with deionized water. The selected triazines could be efficiently extracted by the aqueous extractant at 105 degrees C for 3 min, with 80% output of maximum power (1,200 W). The extraction procedure provided good precision (<7%) and recoveries (76.1-87.2%). The limits of detection were in the range 2-4 microg/kg. Compared with conventional liquid extraction, microwave-assisted extraction-solid-phase microextraction was more efficient, accurate and faster, and used a very small amount of organic solvent (only 250 microL methanol). The extraction of aged spiked soil samples indicated that, although the recoveries were lower than those of freshly spiked samples, they were nevertheless satisfactory for the quantitative analysis of real-world samples.     

Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction

A new microextraction technique termed dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) was developed. DLLME is a very simple and rapid method for extraction and preconcentration of organic compounds from water samples. In this method, the appropriate mixture of extraction solvent (8.0 microL C2Cl4) and disperser solvent (1.00 mL acetone) are injected into the aqueous sample (5.00 mL) by syringe, rapidly. Therefore, cloudy solution is formed. In fact, it is consisted of fine particles of extraction solvent which is dispersed entirely into aqueous phase. After centrifuging, the fine particles of extraction solvent are sedimented in the bottom of the conical test tube (5.0 +/- 0.2 microL). The performance of DLLME is illustrated with the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water samples by using gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID). Some important parameters, such as kind of extraction and disperser solvent and volume of them, and extraction time were investigated. Under the optimum conditions the enrichment factor ranged from 603 to 1113 and the recovery ranged from 60.3 to 111.3%. The linear range was 0.02-200 microg/L (four orders of magnitude) and limit of detection was 0.007-0.030 microg/L for most of analytes. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) for 2 microg/L of PAHs in water by using internal standard were in the range 1.4-10.2% (n = 5). The recoveries of PAHs from surface water at spiking level of 5.0 microg/L were 82.0-111.0%. The ability of DLLME technique in the extraction of other organic compounds such as organochlorine pesticides, organophosphorus pesticides and substituted benzene compounds (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylenes) from water samples were studied. The advantages of DLLME method are simplicity of operation, rapidity, low cost, high recovery, and enrichment factor.     

Development of single‐drop microextraction and simultaneous derivatization followed by GC‐MS for the determination of aliphatic amines in tobacco

In this work, for the first time, headspace (HS) single‐drop microextraction and simultaneous derivatization followed by GC‐MS was developed to determine the aliphatic amines in tobacco samples. In the HS extraction procedure, the mixture of derivatization reagent and organic solvent was employed as the extraction solvent for HS single‐drop microextraction and in situ derivatization of aliphatic amine in the samples. Fast extraction and simultaneous derivatization of the analytes were performed in a single step, and the obtained derivatives in the microdrop extraction solvent were analyzed by GC‐MS. The optimized experiment conditions were: sample preparation temperature of 80°C and time of 30 min, HS extraction solvent (the mixture of benzyl alcohol and 2,3,4,5,6‐pentafluorobenzaldehyde) volume of 2.0 μL, extraction time of 90 s. With the optimal conditions, the method validations were also studied. The method has good linearity (R² more than 0.99), accepted precision (RSD less than 13%), good recovery (98–104%) and low limit of detection (0.11–0.97 μg/g). Finally, the proposed technique was successfully applied to the analyses of aliphatic amines in tobacco samples of seven different brands. It was further demonstrated that the proposed method offered a simple, low‐cost and reliable approach to determine aliphatic amines in tobacco samples.