Valid inequalities and restrictions for stochastic programming problems with first order stochastic dominance constraints

Stochastic dominance relations are well studied in statistics, decision theory and economics. Recently, there has been significant interest in introducing dominance relations into stochastic optimization problems as constraints. In the discrete case, stochastic optimization models involving second order stochastic dominance constraints can be solved by linear programming. However, problems involving first order stochastic dominance constraints are potentially hard due to the non-convexity of the associated feasible regions. In this paper we consider a mixed 0–1 linear programming formulation of a discrete first order constrained optimization model and present a relaxation based on second order constraints. We derive some valid inequalities and restrictions by employing the probabilistic structure of the problem. We also generate cuts that are valid inequalities for the disjunctive relaxations arising from the underlying combinatorial structure of the problem by applying the lift-and-project procedure. We describe three heuristic algorithms to construct feasible solutions, based on conditional second order constraints, variable fixing, and conditional value at risk. Finally, we present numerical results for several instances of a real world portfolio optimization problem. This research was supported by the NSF awards DMS-0603728 and DMI-0354678.     

Robust stochastic dominance and its application to risk-averse optimization

We introduce a new preference relation in the space of random variables, which we call robust stochastic dominance. We consider stochastic optimization problems where risk-aversion is expressed by a robust stochastic dominance constraint. These are composite semi-infinite optimization problems with constraints on compositions of measures of risk and utility functions. We develop necessary and sufficient conditions of optimality for such optimization problems in the convex case. In the nonconvex case, we derive necessary conditions of optimality under additional smoothness assumptions of some mappings involved in the problem.     

Optimization with multivariate stochastic dominance constraints

We consider stochastic optimization problems where risk-aversion is expressed by a stochastic ordering constraint. The constraint requires that a random vector depending on our decisions stochastically dominates a given benchmark random vector. We identify a suitable multivariate stochastic order and describe its generator in terms of von Neumann–Morgenstern utility functions. We develop necessary and sufficient conditions of optimality and duality relations for optimization problems with this constraint. Assuming convexity we show that the Lagrange multipliers corresponding to dominance constraints are elements of the generator of this order, thus refining and generalizing earlier results for optimization under univariate stochastic dominance constraints. Furthermore, we obtain necessary conditions of optimality for non-convex problems under additional smoothness assumptions.     

Two-stage stochastic optimization problems with stochastic ordering constraints on the recourse

We consider two-stage risk-averse stochastic optimization problems with a stochastic ordering constraint on the recourse function. Two new characterizations of the increasing convex order relation are provided. They are based on conditional expectations and on integrated quantile functions: a counterpart of the Lorenz function. We propose two decomposition methods to solve the problems and prove their convergence. Our methods exploit the decomposition structure of the risk-neutral two-stage problems and construct successive approximations of the stochastic ordering constraints. Numerical results confirm the efficiency of the methods.     

Optimality and duality theory for stochastic optimization problems with nonlinear dominance constraints

We consider a new class of optimization problems involving stochastic dominance constraints of second order. We develop a new splitting approach to these models, optimality conditions and duality theory. These results are used to construct special decomposition methods.This research was supported by the NSF awards DMS-0303545 and DMS-0303728.Key words.Stochastic programming – stochastic ordering – semi-infinite optimized – decomposition     

Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations

A multiperson decision-making problem, where the information about the alternatives provided by the experts can be presented by means of different preference representation structures (preference orderings, utility functions and multiplicative preference relations) is studied. Assuming the multiplicative preference relation as the uniform element of the preference representation, a multiplicative decision model based on fuzzy majority is presented to choose the best alternatives. In this decision model, several transformation functions are obtained to relate preference orderings and utility functions with multiplicative preference relations. The decision model uses the ordered weighted geometric operator to aggregate information and two choice degrees to rank the alternatives, quantifier guided dominance degree and quantifier guided non-dominance degree. The consistency of the model is analysed to prove that it acts coherently.     

An MPEC approach to second-best toll pricing

This paper addresses two second-best toll pricing problems, one with fixed and the other with elastic travel demands, as mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. Several equivalent nonlinear programming formulations for the two problems are discussed. One formulation leads to properties that are of interest to transportation economists. Another produces an algorithm that is capable of solving large problems and easy to implement with existing software for linear and nonlinear programming problems. Numerical results using transportation networks from the literature are also presented.This research was partially supported by NSF grants DMI-9978642 and DMI-0300316.     

Optimization with a class of multivariate integral stochastic order constraints

We study convex optimization problems with a class of multivariate integral stochastic order constraints defined in terms of parametrized families of increasing concave functions. We show that utility functions act as the Lagrange multipliers of the stochastic order constraints in this general setting, and that the dual problem is a search over utility functions. Practical implementation issues are discussed.     

Nonlinear rescaling and proximal-like methods in convex optimization

The nonlinear rescaling principle (NRP) consists of transforming the objective function and/or the constraints of a given constrained optimization problem into another problem which is equivalent to the original one in the sense that their optimal set of solutions coincides. A nonlinear transformation parameterized by a positive scalar parameter and based on a smooth sealing function is used to transform the constraints. The methods based on NRP consist of sequential unconstrained minimization of the classical Lagrangian for the equivalent problem, followed by an explicit formula updating the Lagrange multipliers. We first show that the NRP leads naturally to proximal methods with an entropy-like kernel, which is defined by the conjugate of the scaling function, and establish that the two methods are dually equivalent for convex constrained minimization problems. We then study the convergence properties of the nonlinear rescaling algorithm and the corresponding entropy-like proximal methods for convex constrained optimization problems. Special cases of the nonlinear rescaling algorithm are presented. In particular a new class of exponential penalty-modified barrier functions methods is introduced. Partially supported by the National Science Foundation, under Grants DMS-9201297, and DMS-9401871. Partially supported by NASA Grant NAG3-1397 and NSF Grant DMS-9403218.     

Perfect matchings in balanced hypergraphs

We generalize Hall's condition for the existence of a perfect matching in a bipartite graph, to balanced hypergraphs.This work was partially supported in part by NSF grants DMI-9424348, DMS-9509581 and ONR grant N00014-89-J-1063. Ajai Kapoor was also supported by a grant from Gruppo Nazionale Delle Riccerche-CNR. Finally, we acknowledge the support of Laboratiore ARTEMIS, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble.     

Capturing preferences for inequality aversion in decision support

We investigate the situation where there is interest in ranking distributions (of income, of wealth, of health, of service levels) across a population, in which individuals are considered preferentially indistinguishable and where there is some limited information about social preferences. We use a natural dominance relation, generalised Lorenz dominance, used in welfare comparisons in economic theory. In some settings there may be additional information about preferences (for example, if there is policy statement that one distribution is preferred to another) and any dominance relation should respect such preferences. However, characterising this sort of conditional dominance relation (specifically, dominance with respect to the set of all symmetric increasing quasiconcave functions in line with given preference information) turns out to be computationally challenging. This challenge comes about because, through the assumption of symmetry, any one preference statement (“I prefer giving $100 to Jane and $110 to John over giving $150 to Jane and $90 to John”) implies a large number of other preference statements (“I prefer giving $110 to Jane and $100 to John over giving $150 to Jane and $90 to John”; “I prefer giving $100 to Jane and $110 to John over giving $90 to Jane and $150 to John”). We present theoretical results that help deal with these challenges and present tractable linear programming formulations for testing whether dominance holds between any given pair of distributions. We also propose an interactive decision support procedure for ranking a given set of distributions and demonstrate its performance through computational testing.     

Two stochastic dominance criteria based on tail comparisons

Actuarial risks and financial asset returns are typically heavy tailed. In this paper, we introduce 2 stochastic dominance criteria, called the right‐tail order and the left‐tail order, to compare these variables stochastically. The criteria are based on comparisons of expected utilities, for 2 classes of utility functions that give more weight to the right or the left tail (depending on the context) of the distributions. We study their properties, applications, and connections with other classical criteria, including the increasing convex and the second‐order stochastic dominance. Finally, we rank some parametric families of distributions and provide empirical evidence of the new stochastic dominance criteria with an example using real data.     

Stochastic Programming with Multivariate Second Order Stochastic Dominance Constraints with Applications in Portfolio Optimization

In this paper we study optimization problems with multivariate stochastic dominance constraints where the underlying functions are not necessarily linear. These problems are important in multicriterion decision making, since each component of vectors can be interpreted as the uncertain outcome of a given criterion. We propose a penalization scheme for the multivariate second order stochastic dominance constraints. We solve the penalized problem by the level function methods, and a modified cutting plane method and compare them to the cutting surface method proposed in the literature. The proposed numerical schemes are applied to a generic budget allocation problem and a real world portfolio optimization problem.     

Two-stage integer programs with stochastic right-hand sides: a superadditive dual approach

We consider two-stage pure integer programs with discretely distributed stochastic right-hand sides. We present an equivalent superadditive dual formulation that uses the value functions in both stages. We give two algorithms for finding the value functions. To solve the reformulation after obtaining the value functions, we develop a global branch-and-bound approach and a level-set approach to find an optimal tender. We show that our method can solve randomly generated instances whose extensive forms are several orders of magnitude larger than the extensive forms of those instances found in the literature. This work is supported by National Science Foundation grants DMI-0217190 and DMI-0355433.     

Hidden convexity in some nonconvex quadratically constrained quadratic programming

We consider the problem of minimizing an indefinite quadratic objective function subject to twosided indefinite quadratic constraints. Under a suitable simultaneous diagonalization assumption (which trivially holds for trust region type problems), we prove that the original problem is equivalent to a convex minimization problem with simple linear constraints. We then consider a special problem of minimizing a concave quadratic function subject to finitely many convex quadratic constraints, which is also shown to be equivalent to a minimax convex problem. In both cases we derive the explicit nonlinear transformations which allow for recovering the optimal solution of the nonconvex problems via their equivalent convex counterparts. Special cases and applications are also discussed. We outline interior-point polynomial-time algorithms for the solution of the equivalent convex programs. This author's work was partially supported by GIF, the German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development and by the Binational Science Foundation. This author's work was partially supported by National Science Foundation Grants DMS-9201297 and DMS-9401871.     

State constraints in the linear regulator problem: Case study

In this paper, we consider the problem of minimum-norm control of the double integrator with bilateral inequality constraints for the output. We approximate the constraints by piecewise linear functions and prove that the Langrange multipliers associated with the state constraints of the approximating problem are discrete measures, concentrated in at most two points in every interval of discretization. This allows us to reduce the problem to a convex finite-dimensional optimization problem. An algorithm based on this reduction is proposed and its convergence is examined. Numerical examples illustrate our approach. We also discuss regularity properties of the optimal control for a higher-dimensional state-constrained linear regulator problem.The first author was supported by the National Science Foundation, Grant No. DMS-9404431. The second author was supported by a François-Xavier Bagnoud Doctoral Fellowship and by NSF Grants DMS-9404431 and MSS-9114630.     

A unified theory of necessary conditions for nonlinear nonconvex control systems

We consider optimal problems for a general nonlinear nonconvex input-output relation for Banach space valued functions. A maximum principle is obtained using Ekeland's variational principle. The formulation applies to systems described by ordinary differential equations, functional differential equations, and partial differential equations (both for distributed and boundary control systems).This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DMS-8200645.     

Dynamic decision making without expected utility: An operational approach

Non-expected utility theories, such as rank dependent utility (RDU) theory, have been proposed as alternative models to EU theory in decision making under risk. These models do not share the separability property of expected utility theory. This implies that, in a decision tree, if the reduction of compound lotteries assumption is made (so that preferences at each decision node reduce to RDU preferences among lotteries) and that preferences at different decision nodes are identical (same utility function and same weighting function), then the preferences are not dynamically consistent; in particular, the sophisticated strategy, i.e., the strategy generated by a standard rolling back of the decision tree, is likely to be dominated w.r.t. stochastic dominance. Dynamic consistency of choices remains feasible, and the decision maker can avoid dominated choices, by adopting a non-consequentialist behavior, with his choices in a subtree possibly depending on what happens in the rest of the tree. We propose a procedure which: (i) although adopting a non-consequentialist behavior, involves a form of rolling back of the decision tree; (ii) selects a non-dominated strategy that realizes a compromise between the decision maker’s discordant goals at the different decision nodes. Relative to the computations involved in the standard expected utility evaluation of a decision problem, the main computational increase is due to the identification of non-dominated strategies by linear programming. A simulation, using the rank dependent utility criterion, confirms the computational tractability of the model.     

Optimal control problems with state constraints for semilinear distributed-parameter systems

We consider optimal control problems for distributed-parameter systems described by semilinear equations, with constraints on the control and on the state, and an exact pointwise target condition. As an application of a general theory of nonlinear programming problems in Banach spaces, a version of the Pontryagin maximum principle is obtained.This research was partly supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant DMS-92-21819.     

A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method

This paper proposes a comprehensive Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making (MCGDM) method with probabilistic linguistic information based on a new consensus measure and a novel outranking method, Gained and Lost Dominance Score (GLDS). Firstly, new operations of the probabilistic linguistic term sets are introduced based on the adjusted rules of probabilistic linguistic term sets and the linguistic scale functions for semantics of linguistic terms. After defining a new consensus measure based on the correlation degree between probabilistic linguistic term sets, we develop a consensus reaching method to improve the consensus degree of a group. To rank alternatives reasonably, we further propose the GLDS method which considers both the “group utility” and the “individual regret” values. The core of the GLDS is to calculate the gained and lost dominance scores that the optimal solution dominates all other alternatives in terms of the net gained dominance flow and the net lost dominance flow. Then, we integrate the GLDS ranking method with the consensus reaching process and develop a consensus-based PL-GLDS method to solve the MCGDM problems with probabilistic linguistic information. Finally, the proposed method is validated by a case study of selecting optimal green enterprises. Some comparative analyses are given to show the efficiency of the proposed method.