Binaural masking experiments using noise maskers with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. II: Influence of frequency and interaural-phase uncertainty

This study investigates whether binaural signal detection is improved by the listener's previous knowledge about the interaural phase relations of masker and test signal. Binaural masked thresholds were measured for a 500-ms dichotic noise masker that had an interaural phase difference of 0 below 500 Hz and of pi above 500 Hz. The thresholds for two difference 20-ms test signals were determined within the same measurement using an interleaved adaptive 3-interval forced-choice (3IFC) procedure. In each 3IFC trial, both signals could occur with equal probability (uncertainty). The two signals differed in frequency and interaural phase in such a way that one signal always had a frequency above the masker edge frequency (500 Hz) and no interaural phase difference (So), whereas the other signal frequency was below 500 Hz and the interaural phase difference was pi (S pi). The frequencies of a signal pair remained fixed during the whole 3IFC track. These two signals thus lead to two different binaural conditions, i.e., NoS pi for the low-frequency signal and N pi So for the high-frequency signal. For comparison, binaural masked thresholds were measured with the same masker for fixed signal frequency and phase. The binaural masking level differences (BMLDs) resulting from the two experimental conditions show no significant difference. This indicates that the binaural system is able to apply different internal transformations or processing strategies simultaneously in different critical bands and even within the same critical band.     

Binaural speech unmasking and localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants using envelope and fine-timing based strategies

Four adult bilateral cochlear implant users, with good open-set sentence recognition, were tested with three different sound coding strategies for binaural speech unmasking and their ability to localize 100 and 500 Hz click trains in noise. Two of the strategies tested were envelope-based strategies that are clinically widely used. The third was a research strategy that additionally preserved fine-timing cues at low frequencies. Speech reception thresholds were determined in diotic noise for diotic and interaurally time-delayed speech using direct audio input to a bilateral research processor. Localization in noise was assessed in the free field. Overall results, for both speech and localization tests, were similar with all three strategies. None provided a binaural speech unmasking advantage due to the application of 700 micros interaural time delay to the speech signal, and localization results showed similar response patterns across strategies that were well accounted for by the use of broadband interaural level cues. The data from both experiments combined indicate that, in contrast to normal hearing, timing cues available from natural head-width delays do not offer binaural advantages with present methods of electrical stimulation, even when fine-timing cues are explicitly coded.     

Speech perception,localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants

Five bilateral cochlear implant users were tested for their localization abilities and speech understanding in noise, for both monaural and binaural listening conditions. They also participated in lateralization tasks to assess the impact of variations in interaural time delays (ITDs) and interaural level differences (ILDs) for electrical pulse trains under direct computer control. The localization task used pink noise bursts presented from an eight-loudspeaker array spanning an arc of approximately 108 degrees in front of the listeners at ear level (0-degree elevation). Subjects showed large benefits from bilateral device use compared to either side alone. Typical root-mean-square (rms) averaged errors across all eight loudspeakers in the array were about 10 degrees for bilateral device use and ranged from 20 degrees to 60 degrees using either ear alone. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured for sentences presented from directly in front of the listeners (0 degrees) in spectrally matching speech-weighted noise at either 0 degrees, +90 degrees or -90 degrees for four subjects out of five tested who could perform the task. For noise to either side, bilateral device use showed a substantial benefit over unilateral device use when noise was ipsilateral to the unilateral device. This was primarily because of monaural head-shadow effects, which resulted in robust SRT improvements (P<0.001) of about 4 to 5 dB when ipsilateral and contralateral noise positions were compared. The additional benefit of using both ears compared to the shadowed ear (i.e., binaural unmasking) was only 1 or 2 dB and less robust (P = 0.04). Results from the lateralization studies showed consistently good sensitivity to ILDs; better than the smallest level adjustment available in the implants (0.17 dB) for some subjects. Sensitivity to ITDs was moderate on the other hand, typically of the order of 100 micros. ITD sensitivity deteriorated rapidly when stimulation rates for unmodulated pulse-trains increased above a few hundred Hz but at 800 pps showed sensitivity comparable to 50-pps pulse-trains when a 50-Hz modulation was applied. In our opinion, these results clearly demonstrate important benefits are available from bilateral implantation, both for localizing sounds (in quiet) and for listening in noise when signal and noise sources are spatially separated. The data do indicate, however, that effects of interaural timing cues are weaker than those from interaural level cues and according to our psychophysical findings rely on the availability of low-rate information below a few hundred Hz.     

The spatial unmasking of speech: evidence for within-channel processing of interaural time delay

Across-frequency processing by common interaural time delay (ITD) in spatial unmasking was investigated by measuring speech reception thresholds (SRTs) for high- and low-frequency bands of target speech presented against concurrent speech or a noise masker. Experiment 1 indicated that presenting one of these target bands with an ITD of +500 micros and the other with zero ITD (like the masker) provided some release from masking, but full binaural advantage was only measured when both target bands were given an ITD of + 500 micros. Experiment 2 showed that full binaural advantage could also be achieved when the high- and low-frequency bands were presented with ITDs of equal but opposite magnitude (+/- 500 micros). In experiment 3, the masker was also split into high- and low-frequency bands with ITDs of equal but opposite magnitude (+/-500 micros). The ITD of the low-frequency target band matched that of the high-frequency masking band and vice versa. SRTs indicated that, as long as the target and masker differed in ITD within each frequency band, full binaural advantage could be achieved. These results suggest that the mechanism underlying spatial unmasking exploits differences in ITD independently within each frequency channel.     

Thresholds for segregating a narrow-band from a broadband noise based on interaural phase and level differences

Either an interaural phase shift or level difference was introduced to a narrow section of broadband noise in order to measure the acuity of the binaural system to segregate a narrowband from a broadband stimulus. Listeners were asked to indicate whether this dichotic noise or a totally diotic noise was presented in a single-interval procedure. Thresholds for interaural phase and level differences were estimated from four point psychometric functions. These thresholds were determined for three bandwidths of interaurally altered noise (2, 10, and 100 Hz) centered at four center frequencies (200, 500, 1000, and 1600 Hz). Thresholds were lowest when the interaurally altered band of noise was centered at 500 Hz, and thresholds increased as the bandwidth of the interaurally altered noise decreased. Performance did not exceed 75% correct when either an interaural phase shift (180 degrees) or interaural level difference (50 dB) was introduced to a 100 Hz band of noise centered at frequencies higher than 1600 Hz. In a second set of conditions, performance was measured when both an interaural phase shift and level difference were presented in a 10-Hz-wide band of noise centered at 500 Hz. A version of the Durlach E-C model was able to account for a great deal of the data. The results are discussed in terms of the Huggins dichotic pitch.     

Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user

Experiments were conducted with a single, bilateral cochlear implant user to examine interaural level and time-delay cues that putatively underlie the design and efficacy of bilateral implant systems. The subject's two implants were of different types but custom equipment allowed presentation of controlled bilateral stimuli, particularly those with specified interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD) cues. A lateralization task was used to measure the effect of these cues on the perceived location of the sensations elicited. For trains of fixed-amplitude, biphasic current pulses at 100 pps, the subject demonstrated sensitivity to an ITD of 300 micros, providing evidence of access to binaural information. The choice of bilateral electrode pair greatly influenced ITD sensitivity, suggesting that electrode pairings are likely to be an important consideration in the effort to provide binaural advantages. The selection of bilateral electrode pairs showing sensitivity to ITD was partially aided by comparisons of the pitch elicited by individual electrodes in each ear (when stimulated alone with fixed-amplitude current pulses at 813 pps): specifically, interaural electrodes with similar pitches were more likely (but not certain) to show ITD sensitivity. Significant changes in lateral position occurred with specific electrode pairs. With five bilateral electrode pairs of 14 tested, ITDs of 300 and 600 micros moved an auditory image significantly from right to left. With these same pairs, ILD changes of approximately 11% of the dynamic range (in microApp) moved an auditory image from the far left to the far right-significantly farther than the nine pairs not showing significant ITD sensitivity. However, even these nine pairs did show response changes as a function of the interaural (or confounding monaural) level cue. Overall, insofar as the access to bilateral cues demonstrated herein generalizes to other subjects, it provides hope that the normal binaural advantages for speech recognition and sound localization can be made available to bilateral implant users.     

Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users

Various measures of binaural timing sensitivity were made in three bilateral cochlear implant users, who had demonstrated moderate-to-good interaural time delay (ITD) sensitivity at 100 pulses-per-second (pps). Overall, ITD thresholds increased at higher pulse rates, lower levels, and shorter durations, although intersubject differences were evident. Monaural rate-discrimination thresholds, using the same stimulation parameters, showed more substantial elevation than ITDs with increased rate. ITD sensitivity with 6000 pps stimuli, amplitude-modulated at 100 Hz, was similar to that with unmodulated pulse trains at 100 pps, but at 200 and 300 Hz performance was poorer than with unmodulated signals. Measures of sensitivity to binaural beats with unmodulated pulse-trains showed that all three subjects could use time-varying ITD cues at 100 pps, but not 300 pps, even though static ITD sensitivity was relatively unaffected over that range. The difference between static and dynamic ITD thresholds is discussed in terms of relative contributions from initial and later arriving cues, which was further examined in an experiment using two-pulse stimuli as a function of interpulse separation. In agreement with the binaural-beat data, findings from that experiment showed poor discrimination of ITDs on the second pulse when the interval between pulses was reduced to a few milliseconds.     

The influence of interaural stimulus uncertainty on binaural signal detection

This paper investigated the influence of stimulus uncertainty in binaural detection experiments and the predictions of several binaural models for such conditions. Masked thresholds of a 500-Hz sinusoid were measured in an NrhoSpi condition for both running and frozen-noise maskers using a three interval, forced-choice (3IFC) procedure. The nominal masker correlation varied between 0.64 and 1, and the bandwidth of the masker was either 10, 100, or 1,000 Hz. The running-noise thresholds were expected to be higher than the frozen-noise thresholds because of stimulus uncertainty in the running-noise conditions. For an interaural correlation close to +1, no difference between frozen-noise and running-noise thresholds was expected for all values of the masker bandwidth. These expectations were supported by the experimental data: for interaural correlations less than 1.0, substantial differences between frozen and running-noise conditions were observed for bandwidths of 10 and 100 Hz. Two additional conditions were tested to further investigate the influence of stimulus uncertainty. In the first condition a different masker sample was chosen on each trial, but the correlation of the masker was forced to a fixed value. In the second condition one of two independent frozen-noise maskers was randomly chosen on each trial. Results from these experiments emphasized the influence of stimulus uncertainty in binaural detection tasks: if the degree of uncertainty in binaural cues was reduced, thresholds decreased towards thresholds in the conditions without any stimulus uncertainty. In the analysis of the data, stimulus uncertainty was expressed in terms of three theories of binaural processing: the interaural correlation, the EC theory, and a model based on the processing of interaural intensity differences (IIDs) and interaural time differences (ITDs). This analysis revealed that none of the theories tested could quantitatively account for the observed thresholds. In addition, it was found that, in conditions with stimulus uncertainty, predictions based on correlation differ from those based on the EC theory.     

A binaural analog of gap detection.

The temporal resolution of the binaural auditory system was measured using a binaural analog of gap detection. A binaural "gap" was defined as a burst of interaurally uncorrelated noise (Nu) placed between two bursts of interaurally correlated noise (N0). The Nu burst creates a dip in the output of a binaural temporal window integrating interaural correlation, analogous to the dip created by a silent gap in the output of a monaural temporal window integrating intensity. The equivalent rectangular duration (ERD) of the binaural window was used as an index of binaural temporal resolution. In order to derive the ERD, both the shortest-detectable binaural gap and the jnd for a reduction in interaural correlation from unity were measured. In experiment 1, binaural-gap thresholds were measured using narrow-band noise carriers as a function of center frequency from 250 to 2000 Hz (fixed 100-Hz bandwidth) and a function of lower-cutoff frequency from 100 to 400 Hz (fixed 500-Hz upper-cutoff frequency). Binaural-gap thresholds (1) increased significantly with increasing frequency in both tasks, and (2) at frequencies below 500 Hz, were shorter than corresponding silent-gap thresholds measured with the same N0 noises. In experiment 2, interaural-correlation jnd's were measured for the same conditions. The jnd's also increased significantly with increasing frequency. The results were analyzed using a temporal window integrating the output of a computational model of binaural processing. The ERD of the window varied widely across listeners, with a mean value of 140 ms, and did not significantly depend on frequency. This duration is about an order of magnitude longer than the ERD of the monaural temporal window and is, therefore, consistent with "binaural sluggishness."     

Auditory lateralization in monkeys: an examination of two cues serving directional hearing.

In assigning binaural ongoing time differences (phase) as the cue for localization of low frequencies, and binaural intensity differences as the cue for localization of high frequencies, the duplex theory has successfully accounted for human directional hearing of tones. Sensitivity of monkeys to these cues was examined in two experiments. The dependencies on frequency of interaural intensity difference thresholds (lateralization experiment I) and time difference thresholds (lateralization experiment II) were determined behaviorally on three monkeys (M. nemestrina). The range of frequencies was from 125 Hz to 8 kHz in experiment I and from 250 Hz to 2 kHz in experiment II. The results indicate that the duplex theory is applicable to monkeys. However, monkeys are less sensitive than man to both binaural cues. The shortest time disparity monkeys discriminate is 42 microseconds at 1.5 kHz and the smallest intensity difference is 3.5 dB at 500 Hz. Good agreement between the present findings and localization measurements [C. H. Brown et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 1484-1492 (1978)] suggests: (a) that monkeys utilize time disparity cues through higher frequencies than man; and (b) that inaccurate localization by monkeys at high frequencies reflects decreasing sensitivity to interaural intensity cues.     

Binaural masking experiments using noise maskers with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. I: Influence of signal and masker duration

In this paper previous experiments on auditory filter shapes in binaural masking experiments [A. Kohlrausch, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 573-583 (1988)] are extended to a wider range of masker and signal durations. The masker was a dichotic broadband noise with frequency-dependent interaural parameters. The interaural phase difference of the masker was 0 below 500 Hz and pi above 500 Hz. Signal frequency varied between 200 and 800 Hz, and the signal was presented either monaurally (Sm) or binaurally in antiphase (S pi). In the first experiment, the masker duration was fixed at 500 ms and signals of 250 and 20 ms were used. In the second experiment, the signal duration was fixed at 20 ms, and the masker duration was reduced to 25 ms. The results from both experiments are consistent with studies using No or N pi maskers: The binaural masking level difference (BMLD) increases slightly for shorter test signals and decreases strongly for short maskers. The BMLD patterns of the first experiment are well described by the auditory-filter model derived for stationary test signals, if the additional influence of "off-frequency listening" for the short test signal is taken into account. The BMLDs resulting from the second experiment (25-ms masker), however, are much lower than predicted by this filter model This outcome supports previous observations that binaural unmasking becomes less effective for very short masker durations and indicates that this effect is even stronger for maskers with a complex structure of interaural parameters.     

Individual differences in the masking level difference with a narrowband masker at 500 or 2000 Hz

The masking level difference (MLD) for a narrowband noise masker is associated with marked individual differences. This pair of studies examines factors that might account for these individual differences. Experiment 1 estimated the MLD for a 50 Hz wide band of masking noise centered at 500 or 2000 Hz, gated on for 400 ms. Tonal signals were either brief (15 ms) or long (200 ms), and brief signals were coincident with either a dip or peak in the masker envelope. Experiment 2 estimated the MLD for both signal and masker consisting of a 50 Hz wide bandpass noise centered on 500 Hz. Signals were generated to provide only interaural phase cues, only interaural level cues, or both. The pattern of individual differences was dominated by variability in NoSpi thresholds, and NoSpi thresholds were highly correlated across all conditions. Results suggest that the individual differences observed in Experiment 1 were not primarily driven by differences in the use of binaural fine structure cues or in binaural temporal resolution. The range of thresholds obtained for a brief NoSpi tonal signal at 500 Hz was consistent with a model based on normalized interaural correlation. This model was not consistent for analogous conditions at 2000 Hz.     

The effect of masker interaural phase on the detection of a monaural signal

The masking-level difference (MLD) for a 500-Hz monaural pure-tone signal was examined as a function of the interaural phase shift of a 100-Hz-wide noise band centered on 500 Hz. Results indicated that the MLD decreased in magnitude as the interaural phase shift of the masker increased. In a second experiment, the 100-Hz-wide noise band was used as both the masker and the signal in order to examine the detection cues of interaural time difference and interaural level difference separately. Again, the interaural phase of the masker was varied, and an Sm signal was presented. Results indicated that the MLD decreased as a function of increasing masker interaural temporal difference for the time cue, but that the MLD did not change systematically for the level cue. The deterioration of binaural detection as a function of increasing masker interaural phase difference was not as great as that which has been reported in localization and lateralization experiments.     

Monaural and interaural intensity discrimination: level effects and the "binaural advantage"

This study examined whether the level effects seen in monaural intensity discrimination (Weber's law and the "near miss") in a two-interval task are also observed in discrimination of interaural intensity differences (IIDs) in a single-interval task. Both tasks were performed for various standard levels of 4-kHz pure tones and broadband noise. The Weber functions (10 log deltaI/I versus I in dB) in the monaural and binaural conditions were parallel. For noise, the Weber functions had slopes close to zero (Weber's law) while the Weber functions for the tones had a mean slope of -0.089 (near miss). The near miss for the monaural and binaural tasks with tones was eliminated when a high-pass masker was gated with the listening intervals. The near-miss was also observed for 250- and 1000-Hz tones in the binaural task despite overall decreased sensitivity to changes in IID at 1000 Hz. The binaural thresholds showed a small (about 2-dB) advantage over monaural thresholds only in the broadband noise conditions. More important, however, is the fact that the level effects seen monaurally are also seen binaurally. This suggests that the basic mechanisms responsible for Weber's law and the near miss are common to monaural and binaural processing.     

Performance in several binaural-interaction experiments

The relationship between interaural correlation discrimination and binaural detection was investigated using common experimental procedures and common subjects. Psychometric functions were obtained for four normal-hearing subjects at 500 and 4000 Hz using third-octave noise signals for the correlation discrimination experiment, and pure-tone signals and third-octave noise maskers for the detection experiment. Results from these two measurements, which were compared by expressing the signal-to-noise ratio as an equivalent change in interaural correlation, support the idea that interaural correlation discrimination and binaural detection are closely related. Since large intersubject differences in binaural performance were observed in these experiments, interaural-time, interaural-intensity, and monaural-intensity discrimination were measured in a second experiment. The results of the second experiment show large intersubject differences for the interaural tasks, but not for the monaural task.     

Separation of concurrent broadband sound sources by human listeners

The effect of spatial separation on the ability of human listeners to resolve a pair of concurrent broadband sounds was examined. Stimuli were presented in a virtual auditory environment using individualized outer ear filter functions. Subjects were presented with two simultaneous noise bursts that were either spatially coincident or separated (horizontally or vertically), and responded as to whether they perceived one or two source locations. Testing was carried out at five reference locations on the audiovisual horizon (0 degrees, 22.5 degrees, 45 degrees, 67.5 degrees, and 90 degrees azimuth). Results from experiment 1 showed that at more lateral locations, a larger horizontal separation was required for the perception of two sounds. The reverse was true for vertical separation. Furthermore, it was observed that subjects were unable to separate stimulus pairs if they delivered the same interaural differences in time (ITD) and level (ILD). These findings suggested that the auditory system exploited differences in one or both of the binaural cues to resolve the sources, and could not use monaural spectral cues effectively for the task. In experiments 2 and 3, separation of concurrent noise sources was examined upon removal of low-frequency content (and ITDs), onset/offset ITDs, both of these in conjunction, and all ITD information. While onset and offset ITDs did not appear to play a major role, differences in ongoing ITDs were robust cues for separation under these conditions, including those in the envelopes of high-frequency channels.     

Sound segregation based on temporal envelope structure and binaural cues

The ability to segregate two spectrally and temporally overlapping signals based on differences in temporal envelope structure and binaural cues was investigated. Signals were a harmonic tone complex (HTC) with 20 Hz fundamental frequency and a bandpass noise (BPN). Both signals had interaural differences of the same absolute value, but with opposite signs to establish lateralization to different sides of the medial plane, such that their combination yielded two different spatial configurations. As an indication for segregation ability, threshold interaural time and level differences were measured for discrimination between these spatial configurations. Discrimination based on interaural level differences was good, although absolute thresholds depended on signal bandwidth and center frequency. Discrimination based on interaural time differences required the signals' temporal envelope structures to be sufficiently different. Long-term interaural cross-correlation patterns or long-term averaged patterns after equalization-cancellation of the combined signals did not provide information for the discrimination. The binaural system must, therefore, have been capable of processing changes in interaural time differences within the period of the harmonic tone complex, suggesting that monaural information from the temporal envelopes influences the use of binaural information in the perceptual organization of signal components.     

Temporal pitch perception and the binaural system

Two experiments examined the relationship between temporal pitch (and, more generally, rate) perception and auditory lateralization. Both used dichotic pulse trains that were filtered into the same high (3,900-5,400-Hz) frequency region in order to eliminate place-of-excitation cues. In experiment 1, a 1-s periodic pulse train of rate Fr was presented to one ear, and a pulse train of rate 2Fr was presented to the other. In the "synchronous" condition, every other pulse in the 2Fr train was simultaneous with a pulse in the opposite ear. In each trial, subjects concentrated on one of the two binaural images produced by this mixture: they matched its perceived location by adjusting the interaural level difference (ILD) of a bandpass noise, and its rate/pitch was then matched by adjusting the rate of a regular pulse train. The results showed that at low Fr (e.g., 2 Hz), subjects heard two pulse trains of rate Fr, one in the "higher rate" ear, and one in the middle of the head. At higher Fr (>25 Hz) subjects heard two pulse trains on opposite sides of the midline, with the image on the higher rate side having a higher pitch than that on the "lower rate" side. The results were compared to those in a control condition, in which the pulses in the two ears were asynchronous. This comparison revealed a duplex region at Fr > 25 Hz, where across-ear synchrony still affected the perceived locations of the pulse trains, but did not affect their pitches. Experiment 2 used a 1.4-s 200-Hz dichotic pulse train, whose first 0.7 s contained a constant interaural time difference (ITD), after which the sign of the ITD alternated between subsequent pulses. Subjects matched the location and then the pitch of the "new" sound that started halfway through the pulse train. The matched location became more lateralized with increasing ITD, but subjects always matched a pitch near 200 Hz, even though the rate of pulses sharing the new ITD was only 100 Hz. It is concluded from both experiments that temporal pitch perception is not driven by the output of binaural mechanisms.     

Physiological detection of interaural phase differences

Auditory evoked cortical responses to changes in the interaural phase difference (IPD) were recorded using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Twelve normal-hearing young adults were tested with amplitude-modulated tones with carrier frequencies of 500, 1000, 1250, and 1500 Hz. The onset of the stimuli evoked P1m-N1m-P2m cortical responses, as did the changes in the interaural phase. Significant responses to IPD changes were identified at 500 and 1000 Hz in all subjects and at 1250 Hz in nine subjects, whereas responses were absent in all subjects at 1500 Hz, indicating a group mean threshold for detecting IPDs of 1250 Hz. Behavioral thresholds were found at 1200 Hz using an adaptive two alternative forced choice procedure. Because the physiological responses require phase information, through synchronous bilateral inputs at the level of the auditory brainstem, physiological "change" detection thresholds likely reflect the upper limit of phase synchronous activity in the brainstem. The procedure has potential applications in investigating impaired binaural processing because phase statistic applied to single epoch MEG data allowed individual thresholds to be obtained.     

Lateralization of tonal signals which have neither onsets nor offsets.

In order to ascertain the special importance of binaural cues conveyed in the transient portions of dichotic signals, thresholds for interaural differences of time (delta t) and intensity (delta I) were studied using stimuli whose onsets and offsets were masked. Intense noise was used to mask all portions of each experimental trial except for the two intervals of a two-interval, forced-choice detection task. During the intervals, the noise was turned off with decay-rise times of 10 ms. What remained were tones whose interaural phase or intensity was different for intervals one and two. Performance was compared to control conditions which used unmasked gated sinusoids. For longer durations, detection without onsets and offsets was about as good as that with no masker. For the shorter signals, detection without transients was poorer than with standard lateralization, but this is attributed to forward and backward masking which reduced the effective durations of those stimuli. The ability to detect interaural differences of time with the onsets and offsets masked was extended to conditions in which the decay times of the noise were 100 ms. Performance here was slightly worse, but not by so much as to change the basic result. This is interpreted as showing that performance with the faster decay-rise times was not a product of momentary undershoots in neural following, but depended, rather, upon a true encoding of the interaural information in the stimulus fine-structure.