Relative locality of derivations

Let H and K be symmetric linear operators on a C¹-algebra $\text{U}$ with domains D(H) and D(K). H is defined to be strongly K-local if $\text{ω(K(A)}{}^1\text{K(A)) = 0}$ implies $\text{ω(H(A)}{}^1\text{H(A)) = 0}$ for A?D(H) ∩ D(K) and ω in the state space of $\text{U}$, and H is completely strongly K-local if $\text{Ω(K(A)}{}^1\text{K(A))=0}$ implies $\text{Ω(H(A)}{}^1\text{H(A))=0}$ for A ∈ D(H) ∩ D(K) and Ω in the state of $\text{U}$, and H is cpmpletely strongly K-local if $\text{H??}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$ is $\text{K??}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$-local on U?M_n for all n ? 1, where $\text{1}$_n is the identity on the n × n matrices M_n. If $\text{U}$ is abelian then strong locality and complete strong locality are equivalent. The main result states that if τ is a strongly continuous one-parameter group of ¹-automorphisms of $\text{U}$ with generator δ₀ and δ is a derivation which commutes with τ and is completely strongly δ₀-local then δ generates a group α of ¹-automorphisms of $\text{U}$. Various characterizations of α are given and the particular case of periodic τ is discussed.     

The virial theorem in relativistic quantum mechanics

For a class of potentials including the Coulomb potential q = μr^?1 with ¦ μ ¦ < 1 (1) (i.e., atomic numbers Z ? 137), the virial theorem $\text{(u, α ·}\text{p}\text{u) = (u, r(}\text{?q}\text{?r}\text{)u)}$ is shown to hold, u being an eigenfunction of the operator

$\text{Hu = TU : = (α ·}\text{p}\text{+ β + q)u}$

,

$\text{D(H) = {u ¦ u ∈ [H}{}_{\mathrm{loc}}{}^1\text{(}\text{R}\text{+}{}^3\text{)]}{}^4\text{, r}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{u, TU ∈ [L}{}^2\text{(R)}{}^3\text{]}{}^4\text{}}$

($\text{R}$₊³ := $\text{R}$?{0}). The result implies in particular that H with (1) does not have any eigenvalues embedded in the continuum. The proof uses a scale transformation.     

Barriers for uniformly elliptic equations and the exterior cone condition

We consider the mixed boundary value problem $\text{Au = f}\text{in}\text{Ω, B}{}_0\text{u = g}{}_0\text{in}\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{, B}{}_1\text{u = g}{}_1\text{in}\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$, where Ω is a bounded open subset of $\text{R}$ⁿ whose boundary Γ is divided into disjoint open subsets Γ⁺ and Γ^? by an (n ? 2)-dimensional manifold ω in Γ. We assume A is a properly elliptic second order partial differential operator on $\text{Ω}$ and B_j, for j = 0, 1, is a normal jth order boundary operator satisfying the complementing condition with respect to A on $\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$. The coefficients of the operators and Γ⁺, Γ^? and ω are all assumed arbitrarily smooth. As announced in [Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.83 (1977), 391–393] we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of the coefficients of the operators for the mixed boundary value problem to be well posed in Sobolev spaces. In fact, we construct an open subset $\text{T}$ of the reals such that, if $\text{D}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{= {u ? H}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{(Ω): Au = 0}}$ then for $\text{s ? =}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(}\text{mod}\text{1), (B}{}_0\text{,B}{}_1\text{): D}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{→ H}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>s\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(Γ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{) × H}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>s\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{)}$ is a Fredholm operator if and only if s ∈$\text{T}$ . Moreover, $\text{T}$ = ?_xew$\text{T}$_x, where the sets $\text{T}$_x are determined algebraically by the coefficients of the operators at x. If n = 2, $\text{T}$_x is the set of all reals not congruent (modulo 1) to some exceptional value; if n = 3, $\text{T}$_x is either an open interval of length 1 or is empty; and finally, if n ? 4, $\text{T}$_x is an open interval of length 1.     

Estimées Ck pour les couronnes de convexes de type fini de Cn

C^k estimates for convex domains of finite type in $\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ are known from Alexandre (C. R. Acad. Paris, Ser. I 335 (2002) 23–26). We now want to show the same result for annuli. Precisely, we show that for all convex domains D and D′ relatively compact of $\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, of finite type m and m′ such that $\text{D}\text{?D′}$, for all q=1,…,n?2, there exists a linear operator $\text{T}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{q}}$ from $\text{C}{}_{\mathrm{0,q}}\text{(}\text{D′?D}\text{)}$ to $\text{C}{}_{\mathrm{0,q?1}}\text{(}\text{D′?D}\text{)}$ such that for all $\text{k∈}\text{N}$ and all (0,q)-form f, $\text{?}\text{?}$-closed of regularity C^k up to the boundary, $\text{T}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{q}}\text{f}$ is of regularity C^{k+1/max(m,m′)} up to the boundary and $\text{?}\text{?}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{q}}{}^1\text{f=f}$. We fit the method of Diederich, Fisher and Fornaess to the annuli by switching z and ζ. However, the integration kernel will not have the same behavior on the frontier as in the Diederich–Fischer–Fornaess case and we have to alter the Diederich–Fornaess support function which will not be holomorphic anymore. Also, we take care of the so generated residual term in the homotopy formula and show that it is extremely regular so that solve the $\text{?}\text{?}$ problem for it will not be difficult. To cite this article: W. Alexandre, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 336 (2003).     

On the properties of a matrix valued derivative utilizing the Moore-Penrose inverse

Utilizing the Moore/Penrose pseudoinverse to generalize invertibility in the set of matrices, the standard difference quotient in the univariate calculus is generalized to $\text{[? (X + H) ? ? (X)]H}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$, where ? is a matrix valued function and H⁺ denotes the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse of the matrix H. Moreover, the derivative of $\text{??}\text{?Ω}$(X₀) is defined in terms of the limit of this generalized difference quotient, and various properties are established that are natural extensions of the results in the univariate calculus.     

A Feynman-Kac gauge for solvability of the Schrödinger equation

Let {X_t, t ≥ 0} be Brownian motion in $\text{R}$^d (d ≥ 1). Let D be a bounded domain in $\text{R}$^d with C² boundary, ?D, and let q be a continuous (if d = 1), Hölder continuous (if d ≥ 2) function in D?. If the Feynman-Kac “gauge” E_x{exp(∝₀^τ_Dq(X_t)dt)1_A(X_τD)}, where τ_D is the first exit time from D, is finite for some non-empty open set A on ?D and some x?D, then for any $\text{? ? C}{}^0\text{(?D}$), is the unique solution in $\text{C}{}^2\text{(D) ∩ C}{}^0\text{(}\text{D}\text{?}\text{)}$ of the Schrödinger boundary value problem $\text{(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{Δ}\text{+ q)φ = 0}\text{in}\text{D, φ = ?}\text{on}\text{?D}$.     

Singular perturbations in the interaction representation,II

Perturbations of $\text{(?Δ)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>m</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{in}\text{L}{}^2\text{(R}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{),}\text{for}\text{k ? 1}$ and suitable m, by distributions V for which $\text{V}\text{?}\text{(k) = 0(¦k¦}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{),}\text{where}\text{α =}\text{(m + 1 ? ε)}\text{2 ? k}\text{, 0 < ε ? m + 1 ? 2k}$, are shown to correspond to self-adjoint operators H_v, in such a way that H_v depends continuously on V, and agrees with H + V when V is sufficiently regular. These results extend joint work with Irving E. Segal [J. Functional Analysis38 (1980), 71–98], in which perturbations of $\text{(}\text{?id}\text{dx}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$ by distributions V with bounded Fourier transforms in L²(R¹) were considered.     

Concrete model theory for a class of operators with unitary part

Let m and v_t, 0 ? t ? 2π be measures on T = [0, 2π] with m smooth. Consider the direct integral $\text{H}$ = ⊕L²(v^t) dm(t) and the operator $\text{(L?)(t, λ) = e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{?(t, λ) ? 2e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(s, x) e(s, t) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(x) dm(s)}$ on $\text{H}$, where e(s, t) = exp ∫_s^t ∫_Tdv_λ(θ) dm(λ). Let μ_t be the measure defined by $\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dμ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{dm(s)}$ for all continuous ?, and let ?_t(z) = exp[?∫ (e^iθ + z)(e^iθ ? z)^?1dμ_t(gq)]. Call {v_t} regular iff for all $\text{t, ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦ = ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦}$ for 1 a.e.     

Spectral representation for Schrödinger operators with long-range potentials

A spectral representation for the self-adjoint Schrödinger operator H = ?Δ + V(x), x? R³, is obtained, where V(x) is a long-range potential: $\text{V(x) = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>(1</mtext><mtext>2)</mtext><mtext>?\delta </mtext>}}\text{)}$, grad $\text{V(x) = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>(3</mtext><mtext>2)</mtext><mtext>?\delta </mtext>}}\text{)}$, $\text{ΛV(x) = O(¦ x}\text{s}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{?\delta }}\text{) (δ > 0), Λ}$ being the Laplace-Beltrami operator on the unit sphere Ω. Namely, we shall construct a unitary operator $\text{F}$ from PL₂(R³) onto $\text{L}{}_2\text{((0, ∞); L}{}_2\text{(Ω)), P}$ being the orthogonal projection onto the absolutely continuous subspace for H, such that for any Borel function α(λ),

$\text{(α(H)(Pf,g)=}\text{∫}\text{0}\text{∞}\text{(α(λ)(Ff)(λ),(Fg)(λ))L}{}_2\text{(ω) dλ}$

.     

Inner functions in the unit ball of Cn

Let B be the open unit ball of $\text{C}$ⁿ, n > 1. Let I (for “inner”) be the set of all u ? H °(B) that have $\text{¦u¦ = 1}$ a.e. on the boundary S of B. Aleksandrov proved recently that there exist nonconstant u ? I. This paper strengthens his basic theorem and provides further information about I and the algebra Q generated by I. Let XY be the finite linear span of products xy, x ? X, y ? Y, and let $\text{¦X¦}$ be the norm closure, in L^∞ = L^∞(S), of X. Some results: set I is dense in the unit ball of H^∞(B) in the compact-open topology. On $\text{S,}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{Q}$ is weak¹-dense in $\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{, ¦}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{Q¦}$ does not contain $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{, C(S) ?¦}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{¦ ≠ ¦}\text{H}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{¦ ≠ L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$. (When $\text{n = 1, ¦Q¦ = H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{and}\text{¦}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{Q¦ = L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$.) Every unimodular $\text{?}\text{?}\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$ is a pointwise limit a.e. of products $\text{u}\text{v}\text{?}\text{, u}\text{?}\text{I, ν}\text{?}\text{I}$. The zeros of every $\text{? ? 0}$ in the ball algebra (but not of every H^∞-function) can be matched by those of some u ? I, as can any finite number of derivatives at 0 if $\text{∥?∥}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{< 1}$. However, $\text{?}\text{u}$ cannot be bounded in B if u ? I is non-constant.     

Une condition suffisante d'existence d'un circuit hamiltonien dans un graphe oriente

In this article we prove that a sufficient condition for an oriented strongly connected graph with n vertices to be Hamiltonian is: (1) for any two nonadjacent vertices x and y

$\text{d}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{(x)+d}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{(x)+d}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{(y)+d}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{(y)?sn?1}$

.     

Harmonic analysis on hyperboloids

The regular representation of O(n, N) acting on $\text{L}{}^2\text{(}\text{O(n, N)}\text{O(n, N ? 1)}\text{)}$ is decomposed into a direct integral of irreducible representations. The homogeneous space $\text{O(n, N)}\text{O(n, N ? 1)}$ is realized as the Hyperboloid $\text{H = {(x, t) ? R}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; N}}\text{: ¦ t ¦}{}^2\text{? ¦ x ¦}{}^2\text{= 1}}$. The problem is essentially equivalent to finding the spectral resolution of a certain self-adjoint invariant differential operator □_h on H, which is the tangential part of the operator □ = Δ_x ? Δ_t on R^{n + N}. The spectrum of □_h contains a discrete part (except when N = 1) with eigenfunctions generated by restricting to H solutions of □u = 0 which vanish in the region $\text{¦ t ¦ < ¦ x ¦}$, and a continuous part $\text{H}$_?. As a representation of O(n, N), $\text{H}$_? ⊕ $\text{H}$_? is unitarily equivalent to the regular representation on L² of the cone $\text{{(x, t) : ¦ x ¦}{}^2\text{= ¦ t ¦}{}^2\text{}}$, and the intertwining operator is obtained by solving the equation □u = 0 with given boundary values on the cone. Explicit formulas are given for the spectral decomposition. The special case n = N = 2 gives the Plancherel formula for SL(2, R).     

Properties of certain algebras between L∞and H∞

The main result of this paper is that if F is a closed subset of the unit circle, then $\text{(H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{+ L}{}_{\mathrm{F}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{)}\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$ is an M-ideal of $\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$. Consequently, if $\text{? ∈ L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$ then ? has a closest element in H^∞ + L_F^∞. Furthermore, if $\text{¦F¦ >0}\text{then}\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{+ L}{}_{\mathrm{F}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{)}$ is not the dual of any Banach space.     

Critical exponents for the Pucci's extremal operatorsLes exposants critiques pour l'opérateur extrémal de Pucci

In this Note we present some results on the existence of radially symmetric solutions for the nonlinear elliptic equation

(1)$\text{M}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda ,</mtext><mtext>\Lambda </mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{(D}{}^2\text{u)+u}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{=0,u?0}\text{in}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{.}$

Here N?3, p>1 and $\text{M}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda ,</mtext><mtext>\Lambda </mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$ denotes the Pucci's extremal operators with parameters 0<λ?Λ. The goal is to describe the solution set as function of the parameter p. We find critical exponents $\text{1<p}{}^{\mathrm{s}}{}_{\mathrm{+}}\text{<p}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{+}}\text{<p}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}_{\mathrm{+}}$, that satisfy: (i) If $\text{1<p<p}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{+}}$ then there is no nontrivial solution of ($\text{1}$). (ii) If $\text{p=p}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{+}}$ then there is a unique fast decaying solution of ($\text{1}$). (iii) If $\text{p}{}^1\text{<p?p}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}_{\mathrm{+}}$ then there is a unique pseudo-slow decaying solution to ($\text{1}$). (iv) If p^p₊<p then there is a unique slow decaying solution to ($\text{1}$). Similar results are obtained for the operator $\text{M}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda ,</mtext><mtext>\Lambda </mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?}}$. To cite this article: P.L. Felmer, A. Quaas, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 335 (2002) 909–914.     

Asymptotic behavior for an almost periodic,strongly dissipative wave equation

This paper deals with asymptotic behavior for (weak) solutions of the equation $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{tt}}\text{? Δu + β(u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{) ? ?(t, x)}$, on $\text{R}$⁺ × Ω; u(t, x) = 0, on $\text{R}$⁺ × ?Ω. If $\text{?∈L∞(R}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{,L}{}^2\text{(Ω))}$ and β is coercive, we prove that the solutions are bounded in the energy space, under weaker assumptions than those used by G. Prouse in a previous work. If in addition $\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{∈S}{}^2\text{(R}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{,L}{}^2\text{(Ω))}$ and ? is srongly almost-periodic, we prove for strongly monotone β that all solutions are asymptotically almost-periodic in the energy space. The assumptions made on β are much less restrictive than those made by G. Prouse: mainly, we allow β to be multivalued, and in the one-dimensional case β need not be defined everywhere.     

Equations du type de Monge-Ampère sur les variétés Riemanniennes compactes,III

Let (V_n, g) be a C^∞ compact Riemannian manifold without boundary. Given the following changes of metric: $\text{g′}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{= g +}\text{Hess}\text{? ±}\text{l}\text{α}{}^2\text{(▽ ? ? ▽?),}\text{g}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{= ±?g + α}{}^2\text{Hess}\text{?}$, where a is a fixed constant, we study the corresponding Monge-Ampère equations (1)^±$\text{Log}\text{(¦g′}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{¦ ¦g¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{) = F(P,▽?;?)}$, (2)^±$\text{Log}\text{(¦}\text{g}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{¦ ¦g¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{) = F(P, ▽?; ?)}$. We first solve Eq. (2)^?, under some simple assumptions on F?C^∞. Then, using an appropriate change of functions that enables us to take advantage of the estimates just carried out for Eq. (2)^?, we extend to Eq.(1)^? all the results proved in our previous articles [5, 6] for the usual Monge-Ampère equation. Although equation (2)⁺ is not locally invertible, and does not even admit a solution for all $\text{F = λ? + ?, λ > 0, f ? C}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(V}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$, a similar change of functions leads to partial results about Eq. (1)⁺, via C² and C³ estimates for Eq. (2)⁺. Eventually we give some comments and errata of our previous article (P. Delanoë, J. Funct. Anal.41 (1981), 341–353).     

Generalizations of theorems of Lyapunov and Stein

The matrix equation $\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{H}}\text{(A)=∑C}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{A}{}^{\mathrm{1i}}\text{HA}{}^{\mathrm{j}}\text{=W, H >0}$, W ?0, is studied. In the case A¹H+HA = W[H?A¹HA = W], the controllability matrix of (A¹,W) is used to determine the number of eigenvalues of A on the imaginary axis [on the unit circle]. As an application a result of Pták on the critical exponent of the spectral norm is obtained. Estimates for the eigenvalues of A satisfying f_H(A) = M are given.     

Series inversion of some convolution transforms

We study degeneration for ? → + 0 of the two-point boundary value problems

$\text{τ?}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{u := ?((au′)′ + bu′ + cu) ± xu′ ? κu = h, u(±1) = A ± B}$

, and convergence of the operators T_?⁺ and T_?^? on $\text{L}$²(?1, 1) connected with them, T_?^±u := τ_?^±u for all

$\text{u?D(T}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{, D(T}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{) := {u ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) ∣ u″ ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) \&; u(?1) = u(1) = O}, T}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{u: = xu′}$

for all

$\text{u?D(T}{}_{\mathrm{O}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{), D(T}{}_{\mathrm{O}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{) := {u ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) ∣ xu′ ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) \&; u(?1) = u(1) = O}}$

. Here ? is a small positive parameter, λ a complex “spectral” parameter; a, b and c are real $\text{b}$^∞-functions, a(x) ? γ > 0 for all x? [?1, 1] and h is a sufficiently smooth complex function. We prove that the limits of the eigenvalues of T_?⁺ and of T_?^? are the negative and nonpositive integers respectively by comparison of the general case to the special case in which a  1 and b  c  0 and in which we can compute the limits exactly. We show that (T_?⁺ ? λ)^?1 converges for ? → +0 strongly to (T₀⁺ ? λ)^?1 if $\text{R e λ > ?}\text{1}\text{2}$. In an analogous way, we define the operator T_?⁺, n (n ? $\text{N}$ in the Sobolev space H₀^?n(? 1, 1) as a restriction of τ_?⁺ and prove strong convergence of (T⁺_?,n ? λ)^?1 for ? → +0 in this space of distributions if $\text{R e λ > ?n ?}\text{1}\text{2}$. With aid of the maximum principle we infer from this that, if h?$\text{C}$¹, the solution of τ_?⁺u ? λu = h, u(±1) = A ± B converges for ? → +0 uniformly on [?1, ? ?] ∪ [?, 1] to the solution of xu′ ? λu = h, u(±1) = A ± B for each p > 0 and for each λ ? $\text{C}$ if ? ?$\text{N}$.Finally we prove by duality that the solution of τ_?^?u ? λu = h converges to a definite solution of the reduced equation uniformly on each compact subset of (?1, 0) ∪ (0, 1) if h is sufficiently smooth and if 1 ? ?$\text{N}$.     

On Guerra's broken replica-symmetry bound

Consider a random Hamiltonian $\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{(}\text{σ}\text{→}\text{)}$ for $\text{σ}\text{→}\text{∈Σ}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{={0,1}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>N</mtext>}}\text{.}$ We assume that the family $\text{(H}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{(}\text{σ}\text{→}\text{))}$ is jointly Gaussian centered and that for $\text{σ}\text{→}{}^1\text{,}\text{σ}\text{→}{}^2\text{∈Σ}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{,}$$\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{EH}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{(}\text{σ}\text{→}{}^1\text{)H}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{(}\text{σ}\text{→}{}^2\text{)}$ =ξ(N^?1∑_i?Nσ¹_iσ²_i) for a certain function ξ on $\text{R}$. F. Guerra proved the remarkable fact that the free energy of the system with Hamiltonian $\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{N}}\text{(}\text{σ}\text{→}\text{)+h∑}{}_{\mathrm{i?N}}\text{σ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}$ is bounded below by the free energy of the Parisi solution provided that ξ is convex on $\text{R}$. We prove that this fact remains (asymptotically) true when the function ξ is only assumed to be convex on $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$. This covers in particular the case of the p-spin interaction model for any p. To cite this article: M. Talagrand, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 337 (2003).     

On the absolute continuity of Schrödinger operators with spherically symmetric,long-range potentials,II

Let H = ?Δ + V, where the potential V is spherically symmetric and can be decomposed as a sum of a short-range and a long-range term, V(r) = V_S(r) + V_L. Let λ = lim sup_r→∞V_L(r) < ∞ (we allow λ = ? ∞) and set λ⁺ = max(λ, 0). Assume that for some r₀, V_L(r) ?C^2k(r₀, ∞) and that there exists δ > 0 such that $\text{(}\text{d}\text{dr}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{j}}\text{V}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(r) · (λ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{? V}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(r) + 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{= O(r}{}^{\mathrm{?j\delta }}\text{), j = 1,…, 2k,}\text{as}\text{r → ∞}$. Assume further that $\text{∝}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(}\text{dr}\text{¦ V}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(r)¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{) = ∞}$ and that 2kδ > 1. It is shown that: (a) The restriction of H to C^∞(Rⁿ) is essentially self-adjoint, (b) The essential spectrum of H contains the closure of (λ, ∞). (c) The part of H over (λ, ∞) is absolutely continuous.