Wolves in Sheep's Clothing: μ‐Oxo‐Diiron Corroles Revisited

For well over 20 years, μ‐oxo‐diiron corroles, first reported by Vogel and co‐workers in the form of μ‐oxo‐bis[(octaethylcorrolato)iron] (Mössbauer δ 0.02 mm s^?1, ΔE_Q 2.35 mm s^?1), have been thought of as comprising a pair antiferromagnetically coupled low‐spin Fe^IV centers. The remarkable stability of these complexes, which can be handled at room temperature and crystallographically analyzed, present a sharp contrast to the fleeting nature of enzymatic, iron(IV)‐oxo intermediates. An array of experimental and theoretical methods have now shown that the iron centers in these complexes are not Fe^IV but intermediate‐spin Fe^III coupled to a corrole^.2?. The intramolecular spin couplings in {Fe[TPC]}₂(μ‐O) were analyzed via DFT(B3LYP) calculations in terms of the Heisenberg–Dirac–van Vleck spin Hamiltonian H=J_Fe–corrole(S_Fe?S_corrole)+J_Fe–Fe′(S_Fe?S_Fe′)+J_{Fe′–corrole}(S_Fe′?S_corrole′), which yielded J_Fe–corrole=J_{Fe′–corrole′}=0.355 eV (2860 cm^?1) and J_Fe–Fe′=0.068 eV (548 cm^?1). The unexpected stability of μ‐oxo‐diiron corroles thus appears to be attributable to charge delocalization via ligand noninnocence.     

Semiempirical local spin: Theory and implementation of the ZILSH method for predicting Heisenberg exchange constants of polynuclear transition metal complexes

The local spin formalism ( 3 ) for computing expectation values 〈S_A · S_B〉 that appear in the Heisenberg spin model has been extended to semiempirical single determinant wave functions. An alternative derivation of expectation values in restricted and unrestricted cases is given that takes advantage of the zero differential overlap (ZDO) approximation. A formal connection between single determinant wave functions (which are not in general spin eigenfunctions) and the Heisenberg spin model was established by demonstrating that energies of single determinants that are eigenfunctions of the local spin operators with eigenvalues corresponding to high‐spin radical centers are given by the same Heisenberg coupling constants {J_AB} that describe the true spin states of the system. Unrestricted single determinant wave functions for transition metal complexes are good approximations of local spin eigenfunctions when the metal d orbitals are local in character and all unpaired electrons on each metal have the same spin (although spins on different metals might be reversed). Good approximations of the coupling constants can then be extracted from local spin expectation values 〈S_A · S_B〉 energies of the single determinant wave functions. Once the coupling constants are obtained, diagonalization of the Heisenberg spin Hamiltonian provides predictions of the energies and compositions of the spin states. A computational method is presented for obtaining coupling constants and spin‐state energies in this way for polynuclear transition metal complexes using the intermediate neglect of differential overlap Hamiltonian parameterized for optical spectroscopy (INDO/S) in the ZINDO program. This method is referred to as ZILSH, derived from ZINDO, Davidson's local spin formalism, and the Heisenberg spin model. Coupling constants and spin ground states obtained for 10 iron complexes containing from 2 to 6 metals are found to agree well with experimental results in most cases. In the case of the complex [Fe₆O₃(OAc)₉(OEt)₂(bpy)₂]⁺, a priori predictions of the coupling constants yield a ground‐state spin of zero, in agreement with variable‐temperature magnetization data, and corroborate spin alignments proposed earlier on the basis of structural considerations. This demonstrates the potential of the ZILSH method to aid in understanding magnetic interactions in polynuclear transition metal complexes. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2003     

Intramolecular Antiferromagnetism in μ-Oxo-bis[(5,15-dimethyl-2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octaethylporphyrinato)iron(III)]

The magnetism of μ-oxo-bis[(5,15-dimethyl-2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octaethylporphyrinato)iron(III)] with bridge geometry d(Fe? O) = 1.752 Å and ?(Fe? O? Fe) = 178.6° can be explained in terms of antiferromagnetically exchange coupled iron(III)-3d⁵ pairs. The magnetochemical analysis in the temperature range 6K–295K on the basis of the isotropic Heisenberg model (spin Hamiltonian: ? = ?2J?₁ · ?₂ S₁ = S₂ = 5/2) leads to the exchange parameter J = ?125 cm^?1. With regard to the Fe? O bond length the J value corresponds to the series of data observed for other μ-oxodiiron-porphyrins and -porphycenes. Compared to the spin-spin coupling in [Fe₂Cl₆O]^2?, |J| is enhanced by ≈ 10%.     

Electronic Structure Modulation in an Exceptionally Stable Non‐Heme Nitrosyl Iron(II) Spin‐Crossover Complex

The highly stable nitrosyl iron(II) mononuclear complex [Fe(bztpen)(NO)](PF₆)₂ (bztpen=N‐benzyl‐N,N′,N′‐tris(2‐pyridylmethyl)ethylenediamine) displays an S=1/2?S=3/2 spin crossover (SCO) behavior (T_1/2=370 K, ΔH=12.48 kJ mol^?1, ΔS=33 J K^?1 mol^?1) stemming from strong magnetic coupling between the NO radical (S=1/2) and thermally interconverted (S=0?S=2) ferrous spin states. The crystal structure of this robust complex has been investigated in the temperature range 120–420 K affording a detailed picture of how the electronic distribution of the t_2g–e_g orbitals modulates the structure of the {FeNO}⁷ bond, providing valuable magneto–structural and spectroscopic correlations and DFT analysis.     

Broken symmetry density functional study of a mixed‐valence unsymmetrical dinuclear iron complex

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations with different exchange‐correlation functionals were performed for a mixed valence Fe(II)/Fe(III) binuclear complex with μ‐methoxo and two μ‐carboxylate bridging ligands, (1) with geometry optimizations being performed for all possible spin multiplicities (M_S = 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10). Within the exchange‐correlation functionals studied, only the hybrid GGA functionals B3P and B3LYP and also the pure GGA functional RPBE, predicts the geometry with high spin (S = 9/2) to be more stable than the geometry with low spin state (S = 1/2) by 20 kcal/mol, in agreement with the experimental findings. These functionals also predict the same stability order for the different spin states, being M_S = 10>8>6>2>4. The meta‐GGA functionals TPSS and TPSSh and also the pure GGA functionals BLYP and BP86 predict different stability orders. The computed average EPR g‐tensor, g_av, of 2.03, at the B3LYP level, is in good agreement with the experimental findings. Heisenberg exchange coupling constants, J, were calculated within the broken‐symmetry formalism, at the B3LYP level, showing that the two iron centers are antiferromagnetic coupling, with a very weak coupling constant of about ?7 cm^?1, in good agreement with the experimental value. Additionally, the effect of using different multiplicities of the reference geometries on the computed J value is discussed. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2010     

On the Controversial Fitting of Susceptibility Curves of Ferromagnetic CuII Cubanes: Insights from Theoretical Calculations

This paper reports a theoretical analysis of the electronic structure and magnetic properties of a tetranuclear Cu^II complex, [Cu₄(HL)₄], which has a 4+2 cubane‐like structure (H₃L=N,N′‐(2‐hydroxypropane‐1,3‐diyl)bis(acetylacetoneimine)). These theoretical calculations indicate a quintet (S=2) ground state; the energy‐level distribution of the magnetic states confirm Heisenberg behaviour and correspond to an S₄ spin–spin interaction model. The dominant interaction is the ferromagnetic coupling between the pseudo‐dimeric units (J₁=22.2 cm^?1), whilst a weak and ferromagnetic interaction is found within the pseudo‐dimeric units (J₂=1.4 cm^?1). The amplitude and sign of these interactions are consistent with the structure and arrangement of the magnetic Cu 3d orbitals; they accurately simulate the thermal dependence of magnetic susceptibility, but do not agree with the reported J values (J₁=38.4 cm^?1, J₂=?18.0 cm^?1) that result from the experimental fitting. This result is not an isolated case; many other polynuclear systems, in particular 4+2 Cu^II cubanes, have been reported in which the fitted magnetic terms are not consistent with the geometrical features of the system. In this context, theoretical evaluation can be considered as a valuable tool in the interpretation of the macroscopic behaviour, thus providing clues for a rational and directed design of new materials with specific properties.     

Temperature dependence of the 1J(11B19F) spin–spin coupling in BF3 molecule

The ¹J(¹¹B¹⁹F) spin–spin coupling of gaseous BF₃ was observed in ¹¹B NMR spectra as a function of density in a wide range of temperatures. Following the extrapolation of the measured values to the zero‐density limit, the coupling constant free from intermolecular effects ¹J₀(¹¹B¹⁹F) was obtained for each temperature. In contrast to previous investigations, the final results indicate a nonlinear dependence of ¹J₀(¹¹B¹⁹F) on temperature. In the corresponding ab initio calculations of spin–spin coupling constants performed at the coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) level to obtain a reliable result for this coupling constant we had to take into account large vibrational corrections. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Effect of Inter‐Porphyrin Distance on Spin‐State in Diiron(III) μ‐Hydroxo Bisporphyrins

The synthesis, structure, and properties of bischloro, μ‐oxo, and a family of μ‐hydroxo complexes (with BF₄^?, SbF₆^?, and PF₆^? counteranions) of diethylpyrrole‐bridged diiron(III) bisporphyrins are reported. Spectroscopic characterization has revealed that the iron centers of the bischloro and μ‐oxo complexes are in the high‐spin state (S=⁵/₂). However, the two iron centers in the diiron(III) μ‐hydroxo complexes are equivalent with high spin (S=⁵/₂) in the solid state and an intermediate‐spin state (S=³/₂) in solution. The molecules have been compared with previously known diiron(III) μ‐hydroxo complexes of ethane‐bridged bisporphyrin, in which two different spin states of iron were stabilized under the influence of counteranions. The dimanganese(III) analogues were also synthesized and spectroscopically characterized. A comparison of the X‐ray structural parameters between diethylpyrrole and ethane‐bridged μ‐hydroxo bisporphyrins suggest an increased separation, and hence, less interactions between the two heme units of the former. As a result, unlike the ethane‐bridged μ‐hydroxo complex, both iron centers become equivalent in the diethylpyrrole‐bridged complex and their spin state remains unresponsive to the change in counteranion. The iron(III) centers of the diethylpyrrole‐bridged diiron(III) μ‐oxo bisporphyrin undergo very strong antiferromagnetic interactions (J=?137.7 cm^?1), although the coupling constant is reduced to only a weak value in the μ‐hydroxo complexes (J=?42.2, ?44.1, and ?42.4 cm^?1 for the BF₄, SbF₆, and PF₆ complexes, respectively).     

Low‐Spin Pseudotetrahedral Iron(I) Sites in Fe2(μ‐S) Complexes

Fe^I centers in iron–sulfide complexes have little precedent in synthetic chemistry despite a growing interest in the possible role of unusually low valent iron in metalloenzymes that feature iron–sulfur clusters. A series of three diiron [(L₃Fe)₂(μ‐S)] complexes that were isolated and characterized in the low‐valent oxidation states Fe^II? S? Fe^II, Fe^II? S? Fe^I, and Fe^I? S? Fe^I is described. This family of iron sulfides constitutes a unique redox series comprising three nearly isostructural but electronically distinct Fe₂(μ‐S) species. Combined structural, magnetic, and spectroscopic studies provided strong evidence that the pseudotetrahedral iron centers undergo a transition to low‐spin S=1/2 states upon reduction from Fe^II to Fe^I. The possibility of accessing low‐spin, pseudotetrahedral Fe^I sites compatible with S^2? as a ligand was previously unknown.     

Spectroscopic and Computational Study of a Nonheme Iron Nitrosyl Center in a Biosynthetic Model of Nitric Oxide Reductase

A major barrier to understanding the mechanism of nitric oxide reductases (NORs) is the lack of a selective probe of NO binding to the nonheme Fe_B center. By replacing the heme in a biosynthetic model of NORs, which structurally and functionally mimics NORs, with isostructural ZnPP, the electronic structure and functional properties of the Fe_B nitrosyl complex was probed. This approach allowed observation of the first S=3/2 nonheme {FeNO}⁷ complex in a protein‐based model system of NOR. Detailed spectroscopic and computational studies show that the electronic state of the {FeNO}⁷ complex is best described as a high spin ferrous iron (S=2) antiferromagnetically coupled to an NO radical (S= 1/2) [Fe²⁺‐NO^.]. The radical nature of the Fe_B‐bound NO would facilitate N? N bond formation by radical coupling with the heme‐bound NO. This finding, therefore, supports the proposed trans mechanism of NO reduction by NORs.     

Hysteretic Spin Crossover above Room Temperature and Magnetic Coupling in Trinuclear Transition‐Metal Complexes with Anionic 1,2,4‐Triazole Ligands

The reaction of 4‐(1,2,4‐triazol‐4‐yl)ethanesulfonate ( L ) with Zn²⁺, Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, Co²⁺, and Fe²⁺ gave a series of analogous neutral trinuclear complexes with the formula [M₃(μ‐ L )₆(H₂O)₆] ( 1 – 5 ). These compounds were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, thermogravimetry, and elemental analysis. The magnetic properties of compounds 2 – 5 were studied. Complexes 2 – 4 show weak antiferromagnetic superexchange, with J values of ?0.33 ( 2 ), ?9.56 ( 3 ), and ?4.50 cm^?1 ( 4 ) (exchange Hamiltonian H=?2 J (S₁S₂+S₂S₃)). Compound 5 shows two additional crystallographic phases ( 5 b and 5 c ) that can be obtained by dehydration and/or thermal treatment. These three phases exhibit distinct magnetic behavior. The Fe²⁺ centers in 5 are in high‐spin (HS) configuration at room temperature, with the central one exhibiting a non‐cooperative gradual spin transition below 250 K with T_1/2=150 K. In 5 b , the central Fe²⁺ stays in its low‐spin (LS) state at room temperature, and cooperative spin transition occurs at higher temperatures and with the appearance of memory effect (T_1/2↑=357 K and T_1/2↓=343 K). In the case of 5 c , all iron centers remain in their HS configuration down to very low temperatures, with weak antiferromagnetic coupling (J=?1.16 cm^?1). Compound 5 b exhibits spin transition with memory effect at the highest temperature reported, which matches the remarkable features of coordination polymers.     

Intramolekularer Antiferromagnetismus in [Cr2(μ-NH2)3(NH3)6]I3

Intramolecular Antiferromagnetism in [Cr₂(μ-NH₂)₃(NH₃)₆]I₃ The magnetism of [Cr₂(μ-NH₂)₃(NH₃)₆]I₃ which consists of binuclear cations with NH₂^?-bridged face-sharing octahedral coordination polyhedra and a metal-metal separation of 264.9 pm can be explained by antiferromagnetically exchange-coupled Cr^III-3d³ pairs. The magnetochemical analysis in the temperature range 5 K – 295 K on the basis of the isotropic Heisenberg model (spin Hamiltonian ? = ?2 J?₁ · ?₂) leads to the parameter value J = ?98(3) cm^?1. Compared to the exchange coupling in corresponding binuclear chromium compounds with OH^? bridges and identical metal-metal separation the strength of the coupling is significantly enhanced (J_NH2/J_OH ≈? 1.6).     

Selective J‐resolved‐HMQC‐1 and ‐2, new methods for measuring proton–proton coupling constants in strongly coupled spin systems

Efficient pulse sequences for measuring ¹H–¹H coupling constants (J_HH) in strongly coupled spin systems, named selective J‐resolved‐HMQC‐1 and ‐2, have been developed. In the strongly coupled spin systems such as ‐CH₂‐CH_A(OH)‐CH_B(OH)‐CH₂‐, measurements of ³J_HAHB are generally difficult owing to the complicated splitting caused by the adjacent CH₂ protons. For easier and accurate measurements of ³J_HAHB in such a spin system, a selective excitation pulse is incorporated into the J‐resolved HMQC pulse sequence. In the proposed methods, only two strongly coupled protons, H_A and H_B which are excited by a selective pulse, are observed as J‐resolved HMQC signals. The cross peaks of H_A and H_B appear as doublets owing to ³J_HAHB along the F₁ dimension in the selective J‐resolved HMQC‐1 and ‐2 experiments. The efficiency of the proposed pulse sequences has been demonstrated in application to the stereochemical studies of the complicated natural product, monazomycin. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Crystal Structure Analysis of the Repair of Iron Centers Protein YtfE and Its Interaction with NO

Molecular mechanisms underlying the repair of nitrosylated [Fe–S] clusters by the microbial protein YtfE remain poorly understood. The X‐ray crystal structure of YtfE, in combination with EPR, magnetic circular dichroism (MCD), UV, and ¹⁷O‐labeling electron spin echo envelope modulation measurements, show that each iron of the oxo‐bridged Fe^II–Fe^III diiron core is coordinatively unsaturated with each iron bound to two bridging carboxylates and two terminal histidines in addition to an oxo‐bridge. Structural analysis reveals that there are two solvent‐accessible tunnels, both of which converge to the diiron center and are critical for capturing substrates. The reactivity of the reduced‐form Fe^II–Fe^II YtfE toward nitric oxide demonstrates that the prerequisite for N₂O production requires the two iron sites to be nitrosylated simultaneously. Specifically, the nitrosylation of the two iron sites prior to their reductive coupling to produce N₂O is cooperative. This result suggests that, in addition to any repair of iron centers (RIC) activity, YtfE acts as an NO‐trapping scavenger to promote the NO to N₂O transformation under low NO flux, which precedes nitrosative stress.     

Pyridylmethylamines as Ligands in Iron Halide Complexes – Coordination Behaviour Depending on the Halide,the Denticity of the Amino Ligand and the Oxidation State of Iron

2‐Pyridylmethylamine (amp) and 8‐aminochinoline (ach) readily form the following complexes with iron halides in methanol: [(amp)₂FeCl₂] ( 1a ), [(amp)₂FeBr₂] ( 1b ), [(ach)₂Fe(MeOH)₂]Br₂ ( 1c ), and [(amp)FeCl₂(μ‐OMe)]₂ ( 2 ). Methanol was chosen as a solvent because these reactions are rather complex in ether. For example, FeCl₃ forms the ionic complex pair [(dme)₂FeCl₂] [FeCl₄] ( 3 ) with 1,2‐dimethoxyethane (dme). The reaction of FeBr₂ with tridentate di(2‐pyridylmethyl)amine (dpa) and tetradentate 1,2‐dipyridyl‐1,2‐diaminoethane (dpdae) yields the complexes [(dpa)₂Fe]Br₂·2 MeOH ( 4 ) and [(dpdae)₂Fe] [FeBr₄] ( 5 ), respectively. Crystallographic and magnetochemical investigations show the high‐spin configuration for the complexes 1 and 2 , whereas the short Fe‐N distances of 4 clearly indicate a low‐spin state. Compound 2 exhibits an antiferromagnetic exchange interaction with a coupling constant J = ?29.4 cm^?1 (H;af = ?J S;af_A·S;af_B).     

Effect of Heme–Heme Interactions and Modulation of Metal Spins by Counter Anions in a Series of Diiron(III)‐μ‐hydroxo Bisporphyrins: Unusual Stabilization of Two Different Spins in a Single Molecular Framework

A new family of five ethene‐bridged diiron(III)‐μ‐hydroxo bisporphyrins with the same core structure but different counter anions, represented by the general formula [Fe₂(bisporphyrin)]OH ? X (X=counter anion), is reported herein. In these complexes, two different spin states of Fe are stabilized in a single molecular framework. Protonation of the oxo‐bridged dimer 1 by strong Brønsted acids such as HI, HBF₄, HPF₆, HSbF₆, and HClO₄ produces the μ‐hydroxo complexes with I₅^? ( 2 ), BF₄^? ( 3 ), PF₆^? ( 4 ), SbF₆^? ( 5 ), and ClO₄^? ( 6 ) as counter anions, respectively. The X‐ray structures of 2 and 6 have been determined, which provide a rare opportunity to investigate structural changes upon protonation. Spectroscopic characterization has revealed that the two iron(III) centers in 2 are nonequivalent with nearly high and admixed‐intermediate spins in both the solid state and solution. Moreover, the two different Fe^III centers of 3 – 5 are best described as having admixed‐high and admixed‐intermediate spins with variable contributions of S=5/2 and 3/2 for each state in the solid, but two different admixed‐intermediate spins in solution. In contrast, the two Fe^III centers in 6 are equivalent and are assigned as having high and intermediate spin states in the solid and solution, respectively. The X‐ray structures reveal that the Fe? O bond length increases on going from the μ‐oxo to the μ‐hydroxo complexes, and the Fe‐O(H)‐Fe unit becomes more bent, with the dihedral angle decreasing from 150.9(2)° in 1 to 142.3(3)° and 143.85(2)° in 2 and 6 , respectively. Variable‐temperature magnetic data have been subjected to a least‐squares fitting using the expressions derived from the spin Hamiltonians H=?2JS₁?S₂?μ?B+D[${S{{2\hfill \atop z\hfill}}}$ ?1/3S(S+1)] (for 2 , 3 , 4 , and 5 ) and H=?2JS₁?S₂ (for 6 ). The results show that strong antiferromagnetic coupling between the two Fe^III centers in 1 is attenuated to nearly zero (?2.4 cm^?1) in 2 , whereas the values are ?46, ?32.6, ?33.5, and ?34 cm^?1 for 3 , 4 , 5 , and 6 , respectively.     

Magnetic Coupling Constants of Self‐Assembled CuII [3×3] Grids: Alternative Spin Model from Theoretical Calculations

This paper reports a theoretical analysis of the electronic structure and magnetic properties of a ferromagnetic Cu^II [3×3] grid. A two‐step strategy, combining calculations on the whole grid and on binuclear fragments, has been employed to evaluate all the magnetic interactions in the grid. The calculations confirm an S=7/2 ground state, which is in accordance with the magnetisation versus field curve and the thermal dependence of the magnetic moment data. Only the first‐neighbour coupling terms present non‐negligible amplitudes, all of them in agreement with the structure and arrangement of the Cu 3d magnetic orbitals. The results indicate that the dominant interaction in the system is the antiferromagnetic coupling between the ring and the central Cu sites (J₃=J₄≈?31 cm^?1). In the ring two different interactions can be distinguished, J₁=4.6 cm^?1 and J₂=?0.1 cm^?1, in contrast to the single J model employed in the magnetic data fit. The calculated J values have been used to determine the energy level distribution of the Heisenberg magnetic states. The effective magnetic moment versus temperature plot resulting from this ab initio energy profile is in good agreement with the experimental curve and the fitting obtained with the simplified spin model, despite the differences between these two spin models. This study underlines the role that the theoretical evaluations of the coupling constants can play on the rationalisation of the magnetic properties of these complex polynuclear systems.     

Electronic structure of paramagnetic clusters of transition metal ions. 3. Magnetic properties and scattered wave description of the electronic structure of the hexanuclear octahedral cluster [Fe6(μ3−S)8(PEt3)6] (BPh4)2

Spin-polarized Xα–SW calculations of [Fe₆(μ₃?S)₈(PH₃)₆]²⁺ as a model of the cluster [Fe₆(μ₃?S)₈(PEt₃)₆] (BPh₄)₂ have been performed. The highest occupied energy levels are well separated from empty levels, and up to a maximum of eight electrons can be unpaired, giving a maximum spin state with S = 4. This electronic state is consistent with the magnetic data of [Fe₆(μ₃?S)₈(PEt₃)₆](BPh ₄)₂, which have been interpreted using the Heisenberg–Dirac–Van Vleck exchange spin Hamiltonian. The S = 4 state arises from the magnetic coupling between five low-spin (S_i = 1/2) and one intermediate-spin (S = 3/2) iron(III) center. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Experimental and theoretical study of the intramolecular C–H···N and C–H···S hydrogen bonding effects in the 1H and 13C NMR spectra of the 2‐(alkylsulfanyl)‐5‐amino‐1‐vinylpyrroles: a particular state of amine nitrogen

In the ¹H NMR spectra of the 1‐vinylpyrroles with amino‐ and alkylsulfanyl groups in 5 and 2 positions, an extraordinarily large difference between resonance positions of the H_A and H_B terminal methylene protons of the vinyl group is discovered. Also, the one‐bond ¹J(C_β,H_B) coupling constant is surprisingly greater than the ¹J(C_β,H_A) coupling constant in pyrroles under investigation, while in all known cases, there was a reverse relationship between these coupling constants. These spectral anomalies are substantiated by quantum chemical calculations. The calculations show that the amine nitrogen lone pair is removed from the conjugation with the π‐system of the pyrrole ring so that it is directed toward the H_B hydrogen. These factors are favorable to the emergence of the intramolecular C–H_B???N hydrogen bonding in the s‐cis(N) conformation. On the other hand, the spatial proximity of the sulfur to the H_B hydrogen provides an opportunity of the intramolecular C–H_B???S hydrogen bonding in the s‐cis(S) conformation. Presence of the hydrogen bond critical points as well as ring critical point for corresponding chelate ring revealed by a quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) approach confirms the existence of the weak intramolecular C–H???N and C–H???S hydrogen bonding. Therefore, an unusual high‐frequency shift of the H_B signal and the increase in the ¹J(C_β,H_B) coupling constant can be explained by the effects of hydrogen bonding. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Magnetic Characterization of a Series of Iron(II) Coordination Frameworks with 2, 6‐Bis(1, 2,4‐triazole‐4‐yl)pyridine

Based on the bis‐triazole ligand 2, 6‐bis(1, 2,4‐triazole‐4‐yl)pyridine (L), the triazole‐iron(II) complexes [Fe(L)₂(dca)₂(H₂O)₂] · 2H₂O ( 1 ) (Nadca = sodium dicyanamide), {[Fe(μ₂‐L)₂(H₂O)₂]Cl₂}_n ( 2 ), and {[Fe(μ₂‐L)₂(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂ · L · H₂O}_n ( 3 ) were isolated by solvent diffusion methods. When iron(II) salts and Nadca were used, compound 1 was isolated, which contains mononuclear Fe(L)₂(dca)₂(H₂O)₂ units. When FeCl₂ or FeClO₄ were used, one‐dimensional (1D) cation iron(II) chains ( 2 ) and two‐dimensional (2D) cation iron(II) networks ( 3 ) were isolated indicating anion directing structural diversity. Moreover, variable‐temperature magnetic susceptibility data of 1 – 3 were recorded in the temperature range 2–300 K. The magnetic curve of complex 2 was fitted by using the classical spin Heisenberg chain model indicating anti‐ferromagnetic interactions (J = –5.31 cm^–1). Obviously complexes 1 – 3 show no detectable thermal spin crossover behaviors, the lack of spin‐crossover behavior may be correlated with FeN₄O₂ coordination spheres in 1 – 3 .